lensman1955 wrote:
"TruthSeeker" <cloudboy1@aol.comabc> wrote in message news:<1HXQb.4413$BA2.16@newssvr26.news.prodigy.com>...
"BlueAce69" <BlueAce69@aol.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:bush4e0ak2@drn.newsguy.com...
In article <1GgQb.3743$BA2.1717@newssvr26.news.prodigy.com>, TruthSeeker
says...
"The REAL Bud" <newskat@katxyzkave.net> wrote in message
news:hq4310pl623r8kvl5fq1d1jq3mgfh0tdvv@4ax.com...
While still snuggled in a 'spider hole',
(eki)
scribbled:
Dunno whether JP Ennis aka Sollog is dead or what,
but this fella's admiration is based on the fact(?)
that Sollog apparently predicted 911 in 1998.
Ennis did NO such thing.
You're such a freakin' moron. SOLLOG DID PREDICT 911! HERE'S THE PROOF:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=6tb7rp%24g
vr%241%40winter.news.erols.com
Are you so blind that you cannot see this most obvious and clear hit!!
WTF.
Do you hate Sollog so much that you would lie to yourself and tell
yourself
that the above link is not an accurate prediction.
I guess it's because you've been bad-mouthing Sollog for so long that it
would make you "look bad" if you started to agree with him.
Whatever the case may be, you are most certainly a lying, fucktard.
Are you too gullible to see how vauge that "warning" was?
Vague?? I think you meant to say the warning is specific! It gives the
EXACT DATE of the 911 attacks and it states how Washington DC would be
affected. How much more specific must one be before you see the truth? No
one can just give out a random date and have the greatest act of Terror, in
the USA, occur on that EXACT DATE!
Actually, it doesn't say HOW Washington DC will be affected, only that
there will be a great emergency. A warning with a date attached is no
good if there isn't a year and a little more useful information.
A warning based in prophecy is given much more leeway and poetic license
for symbolism and should be analyzed in such a way.
But your point is flawed because an exact date was given with a year by
fans of sollog. There are 2 warnings naming 9/11 and one of those two
said 9/11/2001. You claim there needs to be more useful information, but
a prophet predicting an event of such magnitude has the freedom to
code it if he fears repercussion for being too clear. I see that as
a very reasonable consideration and nullifies your argument.
However, looking more closely at what was being warned of in a wider
context,
there were hints given. Xinophoel wrote only one prediction and said
prior to that prediction that he only writes predictions of cataclysmic
doomsday type nature. And as a sollog supporter, he supported a message
about the destruction of the US which sollog clearly says will occur
from terrorism in Washington DC.
All that in context shows quite a circumstancial case and not as
random or non specific as you claim.
Nostradamus wrote in codes and therefore his writings were not meant to
be taken literally. Sollog and supporters of his named a specific date
and even year. The odds of the greatest act of terror striking the US
on the exact date they gave twice, is astronomical if you understand
probability curves. Lets say you could find 3 portions of nostradamus'
quatrains that said 9/11, 9/11/2001 and terrorism early september. You
know as well as I do every expert or not would either say a direct hit
or say it was a very close prediction for having given a specific date
and year for something "big" to occur related to the USA's destruction.
I know its difficult for you and people who don't like sollog to admit
these very reasonable points, but its the truth and why no one has
any rational or reasonable response, just abuse.
.
