This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0020_01C44BBC.8C454020
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
As I was watching the memorial to Ronnie, I couldn't help but to make a =
comparison to Clinton. Ronnie was a man of great ethics. He loved Nancy =
and it showed. On the other hand, Clinton was getting blow jobs in the =
oval office by an intern. He did it right under the nose of his wife and =
daughter. (Actually, he did it right under the nose of Monica). What a =
difference in people.
------=_NextPart_000_0020_01C44BBC.8C454020
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>As I was watching the memorial to =
Ronnie, I=20
couldn't help but to make a comparison to Clinton. Ronnie was a man of =
great=20
ethics. He loved Nancy and it showed. On the other hand, Clinton was =
getting=20
blow jobs in the oval office by an intern. He did it right under the =
nose of his=20
wife and daughter. (Actually, he did it right under the nose of Monica). =
What a=20
difference in people. </FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0020_01C44BBC.8C454020--
.
|
|
| User: "ex" |
|
| Title: Re: Reagan vs Clinton |
06 Jun 2004 01:14:51 PM |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_020A_01C44BD0.A1B9B6C0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Reagan wasn't perfect, but on relative scale comparing him to *anyone* =
in office since the end of his second term, he looks like a Titan.
At least the guy could speak. And he often did so pursuasively.=20
Whatever his faults, at least he appeared to hold the best interests of =
his nation at heart.
"dreamwalker" <backfromthe@dead.net> wrote in message =
news:8f069$40c34b7d$40762839$29430@powerweb.allthenewsgroups.com...
As I was watching the memorial to Ronnie, I couldn't help but to make =
a comparison to Clinton. Ronnie was a man of great ethics. He loved =
Nancy and it showed. On the other hand, Clinton was getting blow jobs in =
the oval office by an intern. He did it right under the nose of his wife =
and daughter. (Actually, he did it right under the nose of Monica). What =
a difference in people.=20
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.693 / Virus Database: 454 - Release Date: 5/31/04
------=_NextPart_000_020A_01C44BD0.A1B9B6C0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Reagan wasn't perfect, but on relative =
scale=20
comparing him to *anyone* in office since the end of his second term, he =
looks=20
like a Titan.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>At least the guy could speak. And he =
often did so=20
pursuasively. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Whatever his faults, at least he =
appeared to hold=20
the best interests of his nation at heart.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"dreamwalker" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:backfromthe@dead.net">backfromthe@dead.net</A>> =
wrote in=20
message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:8f069$40c34b7d$40762839$29430@powerweb.allthenewsgroups.com"=
news:8f069$40c34b7d$40762839$29430@powerweb.allthenewsgroups.com</A>...<=
/DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>As I was watching the memorial to =
Ronnie, I=20
couldn't help but to make a comparison to Clinton. Ronnie was a man of =
great=20
ethics. He loved Nancy and it showed. On the other hand, Clinton was =
getting=20
blow jobs in the oval office by an intern. He did it right under the =
nose of=20
his wife and daughter. (Actually, he did it right under the nose of =
Monica).=20
What a difference in people. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><BR>---<BR>Outgoing mail is certified =
Virus=20
Free.<BR>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (<A=20
=
href=3D"http://www.grisoft.com">http://www.grisoft.com</A>).<BR>Version: =
6.0.693=20
/ Virus Database: 454 - Release Date:=20
5/31/04</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_020A_01C44BD0.A1B9B6C0--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Reagan vs Clinton |
06 Jun 2004 03:28:09 PM |
|
|
In article <7bJwc.2799$8k4.78236@news20.bellglobal.com>, "ex" <ex@ex.com> wrote:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_020A_01C44BD0.A1B9B6C0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Reagan wasn't perfect, but on relative scale comparing him to *anyone* =
in office since the end of his second term, he looks like a Titan.
At least the guy could speak. And he often did so pursuasively.=20
Whatever his faults, at least he appeared to hold the best interests of =
his nation at heart.
Yes, but he seemed pretty much out of it during his 2nd term. Sufficiently so
that Congress believed him when he said he had no recollection of meetings
involving the Iran-Contra debacle. I believe him, too - I'm sure he didn't
recall those meetings (but don't believe for a minute that Bush Sr., former head
of the CIA, was "out of the loop" on that).
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "dreamwalker" |
|
| Title: Re: Reagan vs Clinton |
06 Jun 2004 07:19:02 PM |
|
|
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:t7Lwc.126561$hY.102640@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
In article <7bJwc.2799$8k4.78236@news20.bellglobal.com>, "ex" <ex@ex.com> wrote:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_020A_01C44BD0.A1B9B6C0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Reagan wasn't perfect, but on relative scale comparing him to *anyone* =
in office since the end of his second term, he looks like a Titan.
At least the guy could speak. And he often did so pursuasively.=20
Whatever his faults, at least he appeared to hold the best interests of =
his nation at heart.
Yes, but he seemed pretty much out of it during his 2nd term. Sufficiently so
that Congress believed him when he said he had no recollection of meetings
involving the Iran-Contra debacle. I believe him, too - I'm sure he didn't
recall those meetings (but don't believe for a minute that Bush Sr., former head
of the CIA, was "out of the loop" on that).
"I never had sexual relations with that woman"
Bill Clinton addressing the people of the USA. And his daughter.....and his wife.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Reagan vs Clinton |
07 Jun 2004 05:27:55 AM |
|
|
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote
(but don't believe for a minute that Bush >Sr., former head
of the CIA, was "out of the loop" on that).
The Vice President was not head of the CIA at that time.
Sometimes operations are put into action without the full knowledge of the Oval
Office, it's done in every administration for the purpose of "plausible
deniability" and is a neccessary function.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Reagan vs Clinton |
07 Jun 2004 08:59:52 PM |
|
|
In article <20040607062755.00660.00000666@mb-m01.aol.com>, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote
(but don't believe for a minute that Bush >Sr., former head
of the CIA, was "out of the loop" on that).
The Vice President was not head of the CIA at that time.
Nope, but he had the connections, the clearance, and Reagan was out of it.
Sometimes operations are put into action without the full knowledge of the Oval
Office, it's done in every administration for the purpose of "plausible
deniability" and is a neccessary function.
You read too many pulp novels. "Plausible deniability" is when there's no paper
trail, and someone else further down the pecking order ends up taking the hit -
as happened with Ollie North. (Come on - you don't really believe that someone
who's nothing but a Colonel would come up with the financing and connections for
the Iran-Contra debacle, do you?!?)
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Reagan vs Clinton |
07 Jun 2004 05:25:16 AM |
|
|
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
Yes, but he seemed pretty much out of it >during his 2nd term.
You have said this about 5 times during the last few months, each time I point
out to you that it is simply not true, that even after he was out of office
President Reagan was very sharp and up on the issues.
He did several lengthy interviews in the early 1990's which are a testament to
his mental clarity.
You just have a hatred for Reagan as you had for both Predicent Bush and his
father and you take every opportunity to try to talk them down.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Reagan vs Clinton |
07 Jun 2004 08:57:39 PM |
|
|
In article <20040607062516.00660.00000665@mb-m01.aol.com>, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
Yes, but he seemed pretty much out of it >during his 2nd term.
You have said this about 5 times during the last few months, each time I point
out to you that it is simply not true, that even after he was out of office
President Reagan was very sharp and up on the issues.
I disagree.
He did several lengthy interviews in the early 1990's which are a testament to
his mental clarity.
As has been pointed out on numerous occasions, lots of material in interviews
ends up on the cutting room floor - you have no idea how much of any interviews
actually made it to the final cut.
You just have a hatred for Reagan as you had for both Predicent Bush and his
father and you take every opportunity to try to talk them down.
I've stated numerous times how highly I have thought of Reagan. I have family
members who worked closely with him and had an extremely high regard for him.
It's merely an unfortunate fact that he was not completely with it during his
last term. I'm sorry if that distresses you, but that's just the way it was.
Bush, OTOH, I did initially like, as he seemed like a real down-to earth kind
of guy (unlike Gore!) but it didn't feel right to me how he got all the
endorsements of the GOP with essentially no experience - something was
definitely not right there. Now I consider him a danger to the world, and I
wouldn't trust him, nor the puppetmaster(s) pulling his strings, for anything.
I don't trust him, plain and simple. But "hatred" is much too strong a word -
it implies that I care enough to invest some emotion into him, and I simply
don't - I'm just doing what I can to keep him out a second term.
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
Cannibals In The White House! Meet President George Bush, Jr., Barbara Bush, Jr., G. Bush, Sr., B. Bush, Sr., Ronald Reagan, Clinton, Nixon, Gerald Ford, Eisenhower, Kennedy, And All The Rest Of The Presidents Of The United States!
Clinton did steal welfare reform from Reagan
Reagan was a Great President
Ronald Reagan
Re: Sailors Hustled on Short Notice to Carrier USS Reagan
A Different Perspective on Ronald Reagan
Reagan Friend Foretold of 1981 Shooting
Nostradamus and Ronald Reagan
| Lefties Now Blame Reagan for 9/11
Reagan Loved
The Reagan Prophecies: The Reagan Prophecies
Did angels intercede to save Reagan's life?
Reagan's Son to Speak at Dem Convention
Ronald Reagan Dies on Date Connected to Sollog Prophecy!
Reagan's falsified obituary
|
|
|
