This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C49062.1BEB3290
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
*1989 - Al Quada founded
*1993-1st WTC attack
*1993 - Al Quada trained somalies attack US peacekeeping forces kill 18
*1998-Bill Clinton and the Europeans sidestep the UN and declare war in =
the Balkans. Questions remain-what was America's interest?
* 1998 US emabassy in Kenya bombed - kill 213
* 1998 2nd US embassy in Kenya bombed - kill 11
*2000 USS Cole attacked=20
* 9/11/01 Thousands murdered in NY & Washington
*9/12/01-GW Bush declares war on Al Qaeda.
*9/1/04-No further major attacks on American civillians or interests.=20
Bush "04. America can't afford another Democrat.
------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C49062.1BEB3290
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2180" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>
<P>*1989 - Al Quada founded<BR></P>
<P>*1993-1st WTC attack</P>
<P>*1993 - Al Quada trained somalies attack US peacekeeping forces kill=20
18<BR></P>
<P>*1998-Bill Clinton and the Europeans sidestep the UN and declare war =
in =20
the Balkans. Questions remain-what was America's interest?</P>
<P>* 1998 US emabassy in Kenya bombed - kill 213<BR></P>
<P>* 1998 2nd US embassy in Kenya bombed - kill 11<BR></P>
<P>*2000 USS Cole attacked <BR></P>
<P>* 9/11/01 Thousands murdered in NY & Washington</P>
<P> </P>
<P>*9/12/01-GW Bush declares war on Al Qaeda.</P>
<P> </P>
<P>*9/1/04-No further major attacks on American civillians or =
interests.=20
</P>
<P> </P>
<P>Bush "04. America can't afford another=20
Democrat.</P></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C49062.1BEB3290--
.
|
|
| User: "Aidan" |
|
| Title: Re: Reality |
01 Sep 2004 09:32:20 PM |
|
|
"dreamwalker" <backfromthe@dead.net> wrote in message
news:78f9c$41367707$407628fa$7903@powerweb.allthenewsgroups.com...
*9/1/04-No further major attacks on American civillians or interests.
But a huge increase in attacks worldwide... face it, Bush stirred up the
hornets nest, and it's only a matter of time until another "Big One" hits
the US again.
Bush "04. America can't afford another Democrat.
And the world can't afford another republican term with Bush at the helm.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Su Zanne" |
|
| Title: Re: Reality |
01 Sep 2004 09:14:08 PM |
|
|
dw wrote:
<-----snip----->
9/1/04-No further=A0major attacks on
American civilians or interests.
Our military is our interests!
900+ and counting.
You think that is not MAJOR because it didn't happen at once?
Is it not MAJOR because they aren't civilians?
Did Iraq and their WMD's cause 9-11?
The world is in a mess right now. We are NOT better off or safer now
than we were then. Bush tries to keep the US in constant fear of another
attack. What good is it to live in fear? Either we are safe or we are
not!
Good riddance to bad shrubbage!
Su Zanne
.
|
|
|
| User: "Barbarossa" |
|
| Title: Re: Reality |
01 Sep 2004 09:55:22 PM |
|
|
"Su Zanne" <tugbertswife@webtv.net> schreef in bericht
news:4998-413681F0-9@storefull-3213.bay.webtv.net...
dw wrote:
<-----snip----->
9/1/04-No further major attacks on
American civilians or interests.
Our military is our interests!
900+ and counting.
almost a 1000. But they died for freedom right? And not the oil-industry
right?
When will it happen again that the leaders of countries decide the outcome
of a war by fighting one another? At least Agamemnon went to troy to battle
against the Troyans. That is not what the imbecile and coward Bush and
Cheney cliques are doing!
You think that is not MAJOR because it didn't happen at once?
Is it not MAJOR because they aren't civilians?
Did Iraq and their WMD's cause 9-11?
The world is in a mess right now. We are NOT better off or safer now
than we were then. Bush tries to keep the US in constant fear of another
attack. What good is it to live in fear? Either we are safe or we are
not!
Good riddance to bad shrubbage!
Very good point.
Kind Regards,
Barbarossa
.
|
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: Reality |
03 Sep 2004 06:54:59 AM |
|
|
"Barbarossa" <fa073505@skynet.be> Spat the Words
When will it happen again that the leaders of countries decide the outcome
of a war by fighting one another? At least Agamemnon went to troy to battle
against the Troyans. That is not what the imbecile and coward Bush and
Cheney cliques are doing!
I'd enjoy seeing a wrestling match between the 70+ year old
Saddam Hussein, and the (God knows how old) ***** Cheney.
That would be THE event of the decade.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Barbarossa" |
|
| Title: Re: Reality |
03 Sep 2004 06:52:19 PM |
|
|
"R. Foreman" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> schreef in bericht
news:Xns95593C2F57E5Drrfkwrantispamattbic@204.127.199.17...
"Barbarossa" <fa073505@skynet.be> Spat the Words
When will it happen again that the leaders of countries decide the
outcome
of a war by fighting one another? At least Agamemnon went to troy to
battle
against the Troyans. That is not what the imbecile and coward Bush and
Cheney cliques are doing!
I'd enjoy seeing a wrestling match between the 70+ year old
Saddam Hussein, and the (God knows how old) ***** Cheney.
That would be THE event of the decade.
Yeah! And Frankie Goes To Hollywood as the reporter! :-)
"When two tribes go to war....." etcetera.
Kind Regards,
Barbarossa
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "dreamwalker" |
|
| Title: Re: Reality |
01 Sep 2004 11:38:23 PM |
|
|
"Su Zanne" <tugbertswife@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:4998-413681F0-9@storefull-3213.bay.webtv.net...
dw wrote:
<-----snip----->
9/1/04-No further major attacks on
American civilians or interests.
Our military is our interests!
900+ and counting.
You think that is not MAJOR because it didn't happen at once?
Is it not MAJOR because they aren't civilians?
Did Iraq and their WMD's cause 9-11?
The world is in a mess right now. We are NOT better off or safer now
than we were then. Bush tries to keep the US in constant fear of another
attack. What good is it to live in fear? Either we are safe or we are
not!
Good riddance to bad shrubbage!
Couldn't disagree more.
Su Zanne
.
|
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: Reality |
03 Sep 2004 06:55:57 AM |
|
|
"dreamwalker" <backfromthe@dead.net> Spat the Words
Good riddance to bad shrubbage!
I like that. It sort of rolls off the tongue.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: Reality |
03 Sep 2004 07:12:50 AM |
|
|
That's not a timeline.
You want a real timeline? Read what follows.
http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1413,36%257E23827%257E2366361,00.html
Victories and setbacks
Under President Bush, the Taliban was defeated and reforms
have been enacted in education and Medicare. But the Iraq war
looms as a key re-election issue.
By John Aloysius Farrell
Denver Post Washington Bureau Chief
Washington - George W. Bush led America through the bleak
days after Sept. 11, 2001, and to victory over the Taliban
in Afghanistan.
On Bush's watch, the nation emerged from the 2001 recession
with dizzying spurts of economic growth.
And, in concert with the Republican-controlled Congress,
the president held schools accountable to tough national
standards and expanded Medicare drug coverage for elderly
Americans.
Bush "surprised a lot of people ... especially in the wake
of Sept. 11," and has a solid reservoir of support in the
American electorate, admits Tad Devine, a senior adviser
to the campaign of Sen. John Kerry. "He is perceived as
commander in chief."
But as Bush enters the backstretch of his re-election
campaign, his decision to invade Iraq threatens to
eclipse his accomplishments.
The war has not gone as the Bush administration promised.
The number of U.S. military personnel killed in Iraq is
rapidly approaching 1,000, with August on course to be one
of the deadliest months of the conflict. Some 6,500 Americans
have been wounded in battle there, and $150 billion has been
budgeted or spent.
The fallout from Iraq has tainted domestic concerns as well.
Oil prices are at record highs, the U.S. budget deficit has
soared, and Bush may become the first president to preside
over a net loss of jobs since the days of the Great
Depression.
Americans are worried. More than half of the voters feel
the nation is on the wrong track, according to public
opinion surveys, and roughly half now disapprove of Bush's
performance as president.
An August poll of military families in the battleground
state of Pennsylvania by Quinnipiac University shows
54 percent of the respondents believe the decision to go
to war was wrong, and only 42 percent plan to vote for the
president in November.
"It was a mistake to launch that military action, especially
without a broad and engaged international coalition,"
retiring 13-term Republican congressman Doug Bereuter of
Nebraska said in a four-page letter to his constituents this
month, announcing his opposition to the war he once supported.
"We are immersed in a dangerous, costly mess," said Bereuter,
an Army veteran and foreign policy expert.
In his campaign speeches, Bush almost always features the
same line about invading Iraq: "Knowing what I know today,
I would have made the same decision."
"The ruler of Iraq was a sworn enemy of America. He was
defying the world," Bush told the Veterans of Foreign Wars
in an Aug. 16 speech. "He was firing weapons at American
pilots who were enforcing the world's sanctions. He had
pursued and he had used weapons of mass destruction. He had
harbored terrorists. He invaded his neighbors. He subsidized
the families of suicide bombers. He murdered tens of
thousands of his own citizens. He was a source of instability
in the world's most volatile region. He was a threat.
"I had a choice to make: either forget the lessons of
September the 11th and trust a madman, or take action to
defend America," Bush said. "Given that choice, I will
defend our country every time."
But the president who promised to unite Americans and end
the partisan bickering in Washington presides over an
intensely polarized, divided nation.
The president who promised to restore integrity to the
White House faces doubts about his truthfulness.
And the president who vowed to conduct foreign policy with
restraint and "humility" - he used the word five times in
a presidential debate with Al Gore in 2000 - has expended
the goodwill offered Americans by other nations after
the 9/11 attacks.
"For one year after Sept. 11, 2001, everything changed.
There was a new seriousness in American politics. The
United States was threatened by a dire enemy, and the
country was unified," said William Schneider, a political
analyst at the American Enterprise Institute. "A majority
of Democrats consistently supported President Bush. He was
admired around the world.
"It ended in September 2002," Schneider said. "What
happened? The U.S. started to make the case for war in Iraq.
Iraq revived all those divisions we hoped had been overcome.
They have been intensified and made far more serious."
Tax cuts and rising deficits
Bush's term in office divides neatly into acts, with the
first act covering the not-quite-eight months between his
inauguration in January 2001 and the morning of
Sept. 11, 2001.
After losing the popular vote to Gore but eking out an
Electoral College victory with the aid of a Supreme Court
dominated by Republican appointees, Bush won the respect
of many political experts by steering a big package of tax
cuts through Congress and working with Democrats on
landmark education reform, the No Child Left Behind Act,
which passed in 2002.
Since many features of the new education law - and of
the Medicare prescription drug bill passed in 2003 - kick
in over time, it is too soon to gauge impact.
But the tax cuts have had measurable effects. When Bush
took office, budget analysts were projecting a 10-year
federal surplus of $5.6 trillion. The government was paying
off its debt, and even Gore had called for a $500 billion
reduction in taxes.
The $1.3 trillion package that passed Congress, with help
from Senate Democrats, cut income tax rates for the
wealthiest Americans but also expanded child tax credits,
reduced the marriage penalty and provided relief to working
families. Bush and his Republican allies added to the 2001
package with more tax cuts in 2002 and 2003.
All taxpayers benefited from the Bush tax cuts, which
undeniably acted as an economic stimulus, but the
president's plan modestly shifted the tax burden from
the wealthiest Americans toward the middle class, according
to the Congressional Budget Office.
The tax cuts also pumped up the federal budget deficit
- to $445 billion in 2004, according to the White House
- that is expected to push the national debt past
$8 trillion next year. To cover debts, the Bush
administration has borrowed an extra $500 billion from
foreign investors, who now own almost half of privately
held U.S. Treasury securities.
The Bush tax cuts "undermined an always fragile coalescence
around fiscal discipline" in Washington, said former Treasury
Secretary Robert Rubin, who served in the Clinton
administration. "Once you had a tax cut in place that so
heavily favored the most affluent, and was so unsound in its
magnitude and structure, I think it was impossible to hold
the line."
Campaigning for re-election, Bush has employed a multipronged
defense for his economic policies. One claim is that the rich
have the resources to cheat the IRS anyway.
"Real rich people figure out how to dodge taxes," Bush told
a Virginia audience earlier this month. Bush also complains
that Congress has stymied his efforts to pass tax and energy
bills, and has frustrated his attempts to impose fiscal
discipline.
But, with the exception of that 18-month period when Vermont
Sen. Jim Jeffords left the GOP and gave the Senate to the
Democrats, Bush's own party has controlled the White House,
the Senate and the House of Representatives for all of his
term, and Congress for the past 10 years.
Bush has not vetoed a single bill in his four years in office;
he could become the first president to serve a full term
without casting a veto since John Quincy Adams left office
in 1829.
In a memoir of his service under Bush, former Treasury
Secretary Paul O'Neill said he was instructed by Vice
President ***** Cheney that "deficits don't matter."
Spending, meanwhile, has risen despite Republican dominance
in Washington.
The White House's own figures show that federal spending
jumped from $1.8 trillion in Bush's first year in office to
an estimated $2.3 trillion this year. As a percentage of the
gross domestic product, spending has risen from 18.6 percent
to 20.2 percent.
The Pentagon and homeland security accounted for most of it.
But other discretionary spending also increased, by 15 percent,
in Bush's first three years.
The stimulus provided by the hikes in government spending,
the tax cuts, and the low interest rates offered by the
Federal Reserve Board fueled spurts of economic growth in
the past year and led to the creation of 1.2 million jobs.
At this pace, however, the nation will have fewer jobs when
Bush's term ends than when it started. Meanwhile, the rising
price of gasoline, the cost of health care and other
inflationary pressures have caused real income - wages
adjusted for inflation - to decline.
Bush asks voters for patience and faith.
"We've come through a lot together," he tells the crowds.
"Think about what this economy has been through: We've
been through a recession, we've been through terrorist
attacks, we've been through corporate scandals, we've been
through a stock market decline."
"Whatever it takes" after 9/11
The second act of the Bush presidency began a month later,
out of the clear blue skies of Sept. 11.
Could the Bush administration have done more to prevent the
terrorist attacks on New York and Washington? Yes, the 9/11
commission has concluded in its report.
Of the 10 "operational opportunities" to foil al-Qaeda's plot,
seven occurred on Bush's watch.
Osama bin Laden was cited more than 40 times in Bush's
top-secret daily intelligence brief. On Aug. 6, one daily
briefing was titled: "Bin Laden Determined To Strike in US."
In response to a "dramatic" increase in reports on terrorist
threats that spring and summer, the commission found, the U.S.
Central Command raised its defense posture to the highest
possible level. "The system was blinking red," former CIA
Director George Tenet told the commission.
But the administration's top foreign policy principals did
not meet to consider the al-Qaeda threat until Sept. 4, 2001.
Richard Clarke, then White House counterterrorism coordinator,
wrote to National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice that day
that he could not comprehend "why we continue to allow the
existence of large scale al Qida (sic) bases where we know
people are being trained to kill Americans."
"Decisionmakers should imagine themselves on a future day
when ... hundreds of Americans lay dead in several countries,
including the U.S.," Clarke said. "That future day could
happen any time."
The commission's report also critiqued the Clinton
administration, the CIA and FBI, Congress and others.
Bush's critics, prompted by Michael Moore's film "Fahrenheit
9/11," may choose to recall how Bush stayed frozen in place
upon hearing of the attacks, as a school class read the story
"The Pet Goat."
But Americans also saw a president who moved them to "the
warm courage of national unity" with his remarks "in the
middle hours of our grief" at the national prayer service
at Washington National Cathedral.
"This conflict was begun on the timing and terms of others,"
Bush said. "It will end in a way, and at an hour, of our
choosing."
Bush then went to New York and stood on the rubble of ground
zero. "Whatever it takes," the rescue workers shouted at him.
"I can hear you. The rest of the world hears you. And the
people who knocked these buildings down will hear all of us
soon," Bush replied, standing in the wreckage, speaking
through a bullhorn.
The U.S. Air Force and Special Forces, working with rebel
tribes from Afghanistan's Northern Alliance, toppled the
Taliban regime by the end of the year but failed to capture
bin Laden or Taliban leader Mullah Mohammed Omar.
Going to war with Iraq
In the fall of 2001, the Gallup organization polled Americans
and found that 90 percent approved of the job George W. Bush
was doing. Just 6 percent disapproved.
Politicians rarely get to draw down that kind of political
capital. Bush decided to spend his on a war in Iraq: the
next act in the Bush presidency.
Bush had unfinished business with the Iraqi dictator, whose
agents had mounted an assassination plot against his father
after the 1991 Persian Gulf War. "This," Bush noted in 2002,
"is the guy who tried to kill my dad."
In the years after the first Gulf War, United Nations arms
inspectors and high-ranking Iraqi defectors disclosed the
fearful successes of Saddam Hussein's program to develop
weapons of mass destruction.
During the 1990s, President Clinton, Sens. John Kerry and
John McCain, and other members of Congress from both parties
had all endorsed the principle that Iraq needed a "regime
change."
The 9/11 attacks raised a sickening question. Al-Qaeda
clearly had no qualms about killing mass numbers of
innocent Americans. How many would be killed if the
terrorists attacked with nerve gas, bio-weapons, or
nuclear arms?
"Many people have asked how close Saddam Hussein is to
developing a nuclear weapon. We don't know exactly, and
that is the problem," Bush told Americans in October 2002.
The U.S. "cannot wait for the final proof - the smoking
gun - that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud,"
Bush said. A few days later, the House and Senate gave
him the authority to take military action against Iraq.
Hard-core Democrats were the first to fall off the Bush
bandwagon. Still seething over the 2000 election, they
were infuriated when the White House advised Republican
candidates in the 2002 midterm elections to use the war
on terror for political advantage.
Sensing a political opportunity, Bush flip-flopped on a
congressional bill to create a new Department of Homeland
Security. The White House originally opposed the bill
because it might create a cumbersome new bureaucracy,
but then embraced a version that would strip many federal
employees of union rights. When Democrats objected, the
GOP challenged their commitment to defend America.
Democratic Sen. Max Cleland of Georgia, for example, who
won the Silver Star and lost three limbs in the Vietnam War,
was driven from office after a Republican TV ad questioned
his courage and honesty - against a backdrop of pictures
of Hussein and bin Laden.
Republicans added to their House majority and took
control of the Senate.
The U.S. went to war on March 19, 2003. On May 1, Bush,
wearing a flight suit, landed on the deck of the aircraft
carrier USS Abraham Lincoln and announced that "major
combat operations in Iraq have ended." Behind him, a
large banner proclaimed "Mission Accomplished."
But the mission was far from accomplished. Iraq remained
in chaos. And there were no stockpiled weapons of mass
destruction.
In an October 2003 memo later leaked to reporters,
Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld questioned whether
the U.S. was actually winning the war on terror.
Rumsfeld acknowledged that the U.S. had but "mixed results"
in combating al-Qaeda and that it would be a "long hard slog"
before final victory in either Iraq or Afghanistan.
Most troubling, Rumsfeld wondered: "Are we capturing, killing
or deterring and dissuading more terrorists every day than
the ... radical clerics are recruiting, training and
deploying against us?"
As U.S. combat deaths mounted through 2003 - 48 in July,
110 in November - Bush was stung by accusations that he
and his administration had hyped intelligence reports,
underestimated the Iraqi resistance and bungled the
occupation.
"There was a massive failure or misinterpretation of
intelligence concerning the weapons of mass destruction,"
Bereuter told his Nebraska constituents this month. "Left
unresolved, for now, is whether intelligence was
intentionally misconstrued to justify military action."
Various military and State Department officials had warned
the White House and the Pentagon that it would take a
massive military presence, considerable international
assistance and billions of dollars to pacify Iraq. Some
were ignored, Bereuter said, others reprimanded.
Vision of "freedom and peace"
Bush offers no regrets for the war that might cost him a
second term; or for the missing Iraqi weapons of mass
destruction, or the ephemeral ties between al-Qaeda and
Hussein.
"Saddam Hussein had the capability to make weapons of
mass destruction, and he could have passed that capability
on to our enemy, to the terrorists," Bush said. "It is a
risk, after September the 11th, that we could not afford
to take."
Bush's hopes for re-election may ultimately rest on how
many Americans endorse his strategy - and the foreign wars
with which he has chosen to implement it - to destroy
Islamic terrorists at the source.
"We must aggressively pursue them and defeat them in foreign
lands," Bush told the VFW earlier this month, "so we do not
have to face them here at home."
The president salts his speeches with upbeat anecdotes
about the success of the Iraqi Olympic team; of American
doctors treating wounded Iraqis; and of young Afghan girls,
freed from the Taliban's yoke, attending school or playing
soccer for the first time.
Bush has a grand vision of "spreading freedom and peace"
throughout the Middle East, and bringing American-style
democracy to the world's 1.3 billion Muslims.
Such a transformation, if achievable, could take decades.
In the meantime, ongoing chaos in Fallujah or Najaf, the
soaring costs of war and the failure of his administration
to accurately assess pre- and postwar conditions in Iraq
have led many voters to question Bush's acumen, motives
and veracity.
Democrats have found a receptive audience when arguing
that Bush has an imperial, pre-emptive approach to the
complex landscape of the 21st century. They agree that
terrorism must be fought at the source but see the downside
of dispatching the Army and Marines to overthrow Islamic
regimes.
Millions of young Muslims are forming bedrock impressions
of the United States from the violent scenes of the Iraq
occupation shown on al- Jazeera and other Arab TV networks,
says Zbigniew Brzezinski, former national security adviser
to Jimmy Carter.
"They see an assertive, ham-handed occupation that is
foreign, and humiliating them," Brzezinski said.
Bush scoffs at such talk; he calls it a sign of weakness.
"There are enemies who hate us, and they're still plotting.
It's the reality of the world we live in today," the
president said on Aug. 18 in Minnesota.
"See, during the 1990s, the terrorists were recruiting and
training for war with us long before we went to war with them.
They don't need an excuse for their hatred.
"I think it's wrong to blame the actions of our country for
the anger and evil of those killers," Bush says. "You don't
create terrorists by fighting back. We defeat the terrorists
by fighting back."
Bush and his surrogates are making the best of his record,
portraying him as a president who has made mistakes, but
always with noble intentions, while never losing sight of
his beliefs.
And with a barrage of negative television advertising, Bush
has portrayed Kerry as a shifty politician, lacking a moral
anchor, who can't be trusted with a wartime presidency.
"There are quiet times in the life of a nation when little
is expected of its leaders," says Bush. "This isn't one of
those times."
Denver Post Washington Bureau chief John Aloysius Farrell
can be reached at 202-662-8990 or .
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "InquiringMind" |
|
| Title: Re: Reality |
01 Sep 2004 09:27:10 PM |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0057_01C49059.AD2D9030
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
"dreamwalker" <backfromthe@dead.net> wrote in message =
news:78f9c$41367707$407628fa$7903@powerweb.allthenewsgroups.com...
*1989 - Al Quada founded
*1993-1st WTC attack
*1993 - Al Quada trained somalies attack US peacekeeping forces kill =
18
*1998-Bill Clinton and the Europeans sidestep the UN and declare war =
in the Balkans. Questions remain-what was America's interest?
* 1998 US emabassy in Kenya bombed - kill 213
* 1998 2nd US embassy in Kenya bombed - kill 11
*2000 USS Cole attacked=20
* 9/11/01 Thousands murdered in NY & Washington
*9/12/01-GW Bush declares war on Al Qaeda.
*9/1/04-No further major attacks on American civillians or interests.=20
Bush "04. America can't afford another Democrat.
How accurate and un-biased...
Remember George Herbert Walker Bush (pres. between 1989-1993), the =
great Democrat!
;-)
------=_NextPart_000_0057_01C49059.AD2D9030
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2180" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"dreamwalker" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:backfromthe@dead.net">backfromthe@dead.net</A>> =
wrote in=20
message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:78f9c$41367707$407628fa$7903@powerweb.allthenewsgroups.com">=
news:78f9c$41367707$407628fa$7903@powerweb.allthenewsgroups.com</A>...</D=
IV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>
<P>*1989 - Al Quada founded<BR></P>
<P>*1993-1st WTC attack</P>
<P>*1993 - Al Quada trained somalies attack US peacekeeping forces =
kill=20
18<BR></P>
<P>*1998-Bill Clinton and the Europeans sidestep the UN and declare =
war=20
in the Balkans. Questions remain-what was America's =
interest?</P>
<P>* 1998 US emabassy in Kenya bombed - kill 213<BR></P>
<P>* 1998 2nd US embassy in Kenya bombed - kill 11<BR></P>
<P>*2000 USS Cole attacked <BR></P>
<P>* 9/11/01 Thousands murdered in NY & Washington</P>
<P> </P>
<P>*9/12/01-GW Bush declares war on Al Qaeda.</P>
<P> </P>
<P>*9/1/04-No further major attacks on American civillians or =
interests.=20
</P>
<P> </P>
<P>Bush "04. America can't afford another Democrat.</P>
<P> </P>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>How accurate and =
un-biased...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Remember <!--StartFragment =
--><FONT=20
face=3D"arial, helvetica, sans serif" size=3D2><FONT=20
face=3D"arial, helvetica, sans serif" size=3D2>George Herbert Walker=20
Bush</FONT></FONT><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D3> <FONT =
face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>(pres. between 1989-1993), the great=20
Democrat!</FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>;-)</FONT></DIV></FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0057_01C49059.AD2D9030--
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
