Registered Republican Voters . . .



 Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus > Registered Republican Voters . . .

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus
User: "Daniel Joseph Min"
Date: 22 Oct 2004 09:43:33 PM
Object: Registered Republican Voters . . .
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Knowing that the Democrats self-imploded when they nominated
ultra-liberal Anti-War Anti-American activist Hanoi John Kerry
for president, knowing that those in charge of protecting our
National Security would *NEVER* allow such a dangerous anti-
military extremist to seize control over the most powerful
military on Earth, and which is presently the most prosperous
and generous nation on Earth, knowing that Kerry shall NEVER
become president of the United States, then we have another
problem with liberal Democrats that we'll have to deal with...
It'll be easy and very tempting to gloat over the Bush-Cheney
reelection once the smoke clears from all the lawsuits being
filed against the election process. On January 20th 2005, we
can expect George W. Bush to again be sworn in as President
of the United States of America. That's a given. But if you're
like me, you'll want to go out of your way to rub it in against
the failed left-wing liberal Democrats, and this is probably
not such a good idea. Why? Because when you stoop down to the
level of rabid dogs, i.e. the leftist Anti-American Democrats
who'll be absolutely livid in the wake of Hanoi John Kerry's
defeat, they'll be rioting in the streets. You know they will.
So, I recommend extending an olive branch out to the moderate
ergo reasonable Democrats and invite them back to the table
for civilized socio-political dialogue. We don't want to ruin
the Democrat Party completely, but we do want to salvage what
little is left of it after this November election is decided,
and President George W. Bush & Vice-President ***** Cheney are
pronounced the clear and unassailable winners of the election.
If not, then they will be reappointed to office just like the
broken 2000 election had forced the Supreme Court to decide.
But of course, if Al-Qaeda hits us by election day, then Bush
is guaranteed to stay in office no matter what happens (unless
Al-Qaeda hits us with nukes, in which case the President could
also be in danger). As you see, the Republicans shall continue
to rule and dominate if 1) Bush wins the election, or 2) Bush
is reappointed by the Supreme Court in lieu of irreconcilable
election results, or 3) God forbid, Bush is seriously injured
or killed in an Al-Qaeda attack whence ***** Cheney will become
President, or 4) Kerry wins the election thus National Security
forces prevent him from seizing power because of his treasonous
Anti-American activities when he returned from just four months
of combat duty in Vietnam--again, keeping President Bush 43 in
the Oval Office for four more years. The Democrats LOSE either
way. The Republicans win either way, and that's bound to make
the already embittered Democrats go off the deep end with rage.
If you think Al Gore and his supporters were angry before, you
just watch and see what happens once they know that GW Bush is
pronounced the winner. The Democrats will be insane with anger!
So, that's why I think we should encourage moderate Democrats
to avoid being dragged down into the quagmire of the activist
Democrat-Anarchist's self-destructive insanity. Those who are
patriotic Americans need to recognize why Hanoi John Kerry is
to dangerous to America's National Security, and that's why he
was NEVER presidential material. American Presidents are first
and foremost patriotic Americans! NO unpatriotic back-stabber
the likes of Hanoi John Kerry will EVER sit behind the desk in
the Oval Office. It hasn't happened, and it will NEVER happen
as long as patriotic Americans are in charge of our government.
Rather than fuel the fire of the predictably violent Democrats
who fervently hate our President and hate the Republican Party,
let's not be pulled down to their filthy animalistic level. We
must remain calm and allow law-enforcement to take care of the
Democrat-Anarchists by whatever means are necessary. If we're
asked to assist law-enforcement in keeping the peace, then we
are obligated to follow their instructions to the letter, and
not do anything illegal. The raving Democrats will be the law-
breakers, and they'll pay the price for their insubordination.
Just be glad that we have such a patriotic and *God-fearing*
President in the White House. And be glad that the Republicans
will continue to dominate Capitol Hill, and even moreso after
the November election. The Democrats are going to be infuriate!
That's THEY'RE problem! Let 'em go down in flames on their own.
They don't need any help from us. They'll simply self-destruct.
VOTE Republican!
Daniel Joseph Min
*Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW (updated October 3, 2004):
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=XJBDEJF138262.9022453704@anonymous.poster
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQXnDOJljD7YrHM/nEQKd7QCfZEIdsK8KhtnEJSyTDWuHfwkVujEAn3cM
dnj1xqBHbSNcnJsvhQ9kkwW6
=l0Tb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.

User: "c-bee1"

Title: Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . 22 Oct 2004 10:00:15 PM
Hey, Danny Min's back! Astrology business tanking again..?
.

User: "Daniel Joseph Min"

Title: Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . 23 Oct 2004 10:38:14 PM
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004, "Morituri-Max" <newage@sendarico.net> wrote:

some Al-Qaeda sympathizer wrote:

* Bill Clinton: Did not serve. Student deferments. Entered draft but
received #311.


Yeah I noticed one.. your democratic roots are showing... are they blonde?
Noticed you didn't say that Bill Clinton actually *dodged* the draft.. instead
you call it something cute like "deferment." So this makes the rest of your
post suspect. Bias is such a terrible thing.. if Bush had really wanted to
dodge the military he could have easily used all that power you say people
wielded on his behalf and avoided any service of *any* kind..

Also, when is the last time you piloted the kind of jets Bush flew in.. let me
know when you do how safe it is to fly them. I noticed with all this emphasis
you place on Kerrys combat record and how much he risked his life you don't
mention that he did so for as short a time as possible.. 3 1/2 to 4 months of
combat (driving up and down the river in a big well armed boat occasionally
shooting kids in the back and burning down villages full of dangerous unarmed
vietnamese civilians) is not nearly as risky as the time Bush spent in a
cockpit
of a combat jet... in point of fact anyone in the military piloting any kind
of
aircraft put their lives more at risk than Kerry who liked gathering up purple
hearts for minor wounds..

And as gung ho as kerry likes to claim he was, including all the trouble he
went
to to get sent into combat on the swift boats, he sure did get clear as fast as
he could.. I guess he really didn't care that much about his crewmembers since
they got to stay in combat while he took the optional out with his 3 hearts..
so
long guys, screw you, I'm out to a nice cushy desk job..

..speaking of which, what military experience do you have? and as for mine, I
have 10 years in the Air Force including the 1st Gulf War.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I'm grateful to every brave soul who has served in the United States
military since the founding of our great nation, irrespective of his
or her party affiliation or lack thereof. And though Senator Kerry's
brief stint in Vietnam has raised some questions among many of his
fellow swift boat vets, it's not so much what he did in Vietnam that
concerns Americans, but is what he did AFTER he returned to the U.S.
Once STOLEN HONOR & CELSIUS 41.11 hit the theaters, and Sinclair's
one-hour special on the subject is aired on all 62 of their stations
before election-day, Kerry's egregious and treasonous betrayal of his
fellow soldiers serving in Vietnam, with many being tortured in POW
camps in North Vietcong, Kerry's indisputably dishonorable behavior
is going to come back to haunt him on election-day, rest assured...
And while the Vietnam conflict was FAR from popular and there were
probably _some_ atrocities committed by a minuscule percentage of
mentally-unstable cowboys run amuck (probably suffering from PTSD),
the vast majority of Vietnam vets served honorably--and many became
highly-decorated war heroes worthy of ever medal they were awarded.
And notably, unlike Kerry, none of them "threw their medals away".
The number one issue facing voters in this election is terrorism,
and the clear and present danger that terrorists will attack the
United States again, but this time it will likely be a thousand
times more destructive and lethal than their attack on 9/11/2001.
So the voting populace must ask themselves, WHO will aggressively
take the fight to the enemy Islamic Jihadists on a planetary scale
in order to eliminate the terrorist threat at its source? Clearly,
the answer is President George W. Bush. Even if we were living in
peace time, a simple F.B.I. background check on Hanoi John Kerry
would easily preclude him from ever serving as commander-in-chief
of the United States military. Because of this, I know that Bush
will remain in office long after his re-inauguration January 20th.
Blinded with bitterness over the 2000 "election" and subsequent
appointment of GW Bush to the Oval Office, the Democrats simply
nominated the WRONG person for president! Maybe in 2008 they'll
be more careful before nominating their candidate for president,
or at least they'll be damn-sure that their chosen man or woman
isn't on record as having so horribly betrayed American soldiers
in wartime as John Kerry went _so far out of his way_ to do upon
returning from Vietnam. Kerry's just *NOT* presidential material,
and I'm entirely confident that those in charge of our National
Security already know that John Kerry will NEVER become president,
and I find that assurance most comforting. Bush-Cheney will breeze
past Kerry-Edwards by whatever means are necessary. That's a given.
But what does deeply concern me are the Democrat-Anarchists, who
are likely to be so insanely angry over GW Bush's guaranteed re-
election that they are apt to be helping Al-Qaeda sleeper cells
who are believed to be already here in the U.S., and armed with
WMDs, and planning to attack vulnerable and crowded targets on
or before election-day, in hopes of disrupting America's election
process like they've recently accomplished in Spain and elsewhere.
I do believe that the more reasonable and patriotic moderates in
the Democrat Party will recognize WHY John Kerry can't be allowed
to compromise our national security and jeopardize the US military
ever again--most especially NOT from the position of commander-in-
chief over the most powerful military complex in the modern world!
Moderate Democrats who simply don't like President George W. Bush
no matter what should vote for Ralph Nader or some other write-in
candidate where available, or just don't vote for any presidential
candidate. At least Ralph Nader didn't betray US soldiers in wartime.
VOTE your Conscience,
Daniel Joseph Min
*Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW (updated October 3, 2004):
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=XJBDEJF138262.9022453704@anonymous.poster
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQXsflpljD7YrHM/nEQIEXQCg6JjjryVJHRv00D5l8LXrt34OKl8An0Ii
ZE58wODVhv5AyRTUh460/F1M
=TD33
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.

User: "bumblebee"

Title: Re: Registered Republican Voters . . . 23 Oct 2004 08:30:34 PM
http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2004/09/10/conservatives/index/
-bumblebee
On 23 Oct 2004 02:43:33 -0000, Daniel Joseph Min
<Real.Min@Colorado.USA> wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Knowing that the Democrats self-imploded when they nominated
ultra-liberal Anti-War Anti-American activist Hanoi John Kerry
for president, knowing that those in charge of protecting our
National Security would *NEVER* allow such a dangerous anti-
military extremist to seize control over the most powerful
military on Earth, and which is presently the most prosperous
and generous nation on Earth, knowing that Kerry shall NEVER
become president of the United States, then we have another
problem with liberal Democrats that we'll have to deal with...

It'll be easy and very tempting to gloat over the Bush-Cheney
reelection once the smoke clears from all the lawsuits being
filed against the election process. On January 20th 2005, we
can expect George W. Bush to again be sworn in as President
of the United States of America. That's a given. But if you're
like me, you'll want to go out of your way to rub it in against
the failed left-wing liberal Democrats, and this is probably
not such a good idea. Why? Because when you stoop down to the
level of rabid dogs, i.e. the leftist Anti-American Democrats
who'll be absolutely livid in the wake of Hanoi John Kerry's
defeat, they'll be rioting in the streets. You know they will.

So, I recommend extending an olive branch out to the moderate
ergo reasonable Democrats and invite them back to the table
for civilized socio-political dialogue. We don't want to ruin
the Democrat Party completely, but we do want to salvage what
little is left of it after this November election is decided,
and President George W. Bush & Vice-President ***** Cheney are
pronounced the clear and unassailable winners of the election.
If not, then they will be reappointed to office just like the
broken 2000 election had forced the Supreme Court to decide.

But of course, if Al-Qaeda hits us by election day, then Bush
is guaranteed to stay in office no matter what happens (unless
Al-Qaeda hits us with nukes, in which case the President could
also be in danger). As you see, the Republicans shall continue
to rule and dominate if 1) Bush wins the election, or 2) Bush
is reappointed by the Supreme Court in lieu of irreconcilable
election results, or 3) God forbid, Bush is seriously injured
or killed in an Al-Qaeda attack whence ***** Cheney will become
President, or 4) Kerry wins the election thus National Security
forces prevent him from seizing power because of his treasonous
Anti-American activities when he returned from just four months
of combat duty in Vietnam--again, keeping President Bush 43 in
the Oval Office for four more years. The Democrats LOSE either
way. The Republicans win either way, and that's bound to make
the already embittered Democrats go off the deep end with rage.
If you think Al Gore and his supporters were angry before, you
just watch and see what happens once they know that GW Bush is
pronounced the winner. The Democrats will be insane with anger!

So, that's why I think we should encourage moderate Democrats
to avoid being dragged down into the quagmire of the activist
Democrat-Anarchist's self-destructive insanity. Those who are
patriotic Americans need to recognize why Hanoi John Kerry is
to dangerous to America's National Security, and that's why he
was NEVER presidential material. American Presidents are first
and foremost patriotic Americans! NO unpatriotic back-stabber
the likes of Hanoi John Kerry will EVER sit behind the desk in
the Oval Office. It hasn't happened, and it will NEVER happen
as long as patriotic Americans are in charge of our government.

Rather than fuel the fire of the predictably violent Democrats
who fervently hate our President and hate the Republican Party,
let's not be pulled down to their filthy animalistic level. We
must remain calm and allow law-enforcement to take care of the
Democrat-Anarchists by whatever means are necessary. If we're
asked to assist law-enforcement in keeping the peace, then we
are obligated to follow their instructions to the letter, and
not do anything illegal. The raving Democrats will be the law-
breakers, and they'll pay the price for their insubordination.

Just be glad that we have such a patriotic and *God-fearing*
President in the White House. And be glad that the Republicans
will continue to dominate Capitol Hill, and even moreso after
the November election. The Democrats are going to be infuriate!

That's THEY'RE problem! Let 'em go down in flames on their own.
They don't need any help from us. They'll simply self-destruct.

VOTE Republican!
Daniel Joseph Min

*Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW (updated October 3, 2004):
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=XJBDEJF138262.9022453704@anonymous.poster

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQXnDOJljD7YrHM/nEQKd7QCfZEIdsK8KhtnEJSyTDWuHfwkVujEAn3cM
dnj1xqBHbSNcnJsvhQ9kkwW6
=l0Tb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
2008 will be the surge of American voters coming home to the Republican Party
Republican leadership does nothing for border security & if Kerry wins an open border policy is assured."
Re: National Field Director for Republican Party sought unsafe sex, multiplepartners online
Republican Governor Impeached for accepting Kickbacks.
*VOTE* Bush-Cheney 2004!! *VOTE* Republican!
Re : Will America eventually outlaw the Republican Party?
Re: Republican *Database* Against Liberals ``
Re: 13 point drop in Republican support of BushCo `~
Republican VICTORY +2 Days & Counting...
"Guide to Republican Glamour"
CHRISTIANS: Vote Republican November 2, 2004!
Going to a Hollywood party Mr. Republican?
Feds Probe Trip That Republican Congressman Jim Kolbe Made With Pages
Republican convention schedule
Re: Republican *Database* Against Liberals `~~
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER