This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C67B93.43C571E0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Iran to force non-Muslims to wear colored badges in public, if true, =
would be "despicable" reminders of Nazi Germany's persecution of the =
Jews, a US spokesman said. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack =
said he had not seen details of the reports, which prompted expressions =
of concern from the prime ministers of Canada and Australia after they =
appeared in a Canadian newspaper.
But McCormack added, "If you did have such an occurrence, whether it was =
in Iran or elsewhere, it would certainly be despicable."
"I think it has clear echoes of Germany under Hitler," he said, =
referring to Nazi dictator who presided over the extermination of six =
million Jews before and during World War II.
A Jewish member of the Iranian parliament categorically denied the =
report in Canada's National Post that a law passed this week would force =
Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians to wear yellow, red or blue strips of =
cloth respectively.
"This report is a complete fabrication and totally false," Maurice =
Motammed told AFP in Tehran. "It is a lie and the people who made it up =
were aiming to exploit it politically."
Iran's new hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had already come in =
for widespread criticism for suggesting that the Holocaust was a myth =
and calling for=20
Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper said he had only seen reports =
about the badge law but added, "Unfortunately, we have seen enough =
already from the Iranian regime to suggest that it is very capable of =
this kind of action."
Visiting Australian Prime Minister John Howard also expressed his =
indignation. "Anything of that kind would be totally repugnant to =
civilized countries," he told reporters in Canada.
------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C67B93.43C571E0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2873" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN class=3Dyqlink>
<P>
<FORM class=3Dyqin action=3Dhttp://yq.search.yahoo.com/search=20
method=3Dpost><STRONG></STRONG> </FORM></P>
<P></SPAN>Iran to force non-Muslims to wear colored badges in public, if =
true,=20
would be "despicable" reminders of Nazi Germany's persecution of the =
Jews, a US=20
spokesman said. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said he had =
not seen=20
details of the reports, which prompted expressions of concern from the =
prime=20
ministers of Canada and Australia after they appeared in a Canadian=20
newspaper.</P>
<P>But McCormack added, "If you did have such an occurrence, whether it =
was in=20
Iran or elsewhere, it would certainly be despicable."</P>
<P>"I think it has clear echoes of Germany under Hitler," he said, =
referring to=20
Nazi dictator who presided over the extermination of six million Jews =
before and=20
during World War II.</P>
<P>A Jewish member of the Iranian parliament categorically denied the =
report in=20
Canada's National Post that a law passed this week would force Jews, =
Christians=20
and Zoroastrians to wear yellow, red or blue strips of cloth =
respectively.</P>
<P>"This report is a complete fabrication and totally false," Maurice =
Motammed=20
told AFP in Tehran. "It is a lie and the people who made it up were =
aiming to=20
exploit it politically."</P>
<P>Iran's new hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had already come in =
for=20
widespread criticism for suggesting that the Holocaust was a myth and =
calling=20
for=20
<FORM class=3Dyqin action=3Dhttp://yq.search.yahoo.com/search =
method=3Dpost>Canadian=20
Prime Minister Stephen Harper said he had only seen reports about the =
badge law=20
but added, "Unfortunately, we have seen enough already from the Iranian =
regime=20
to suggest that it is very capable of this kind of action."</FORM></P>
<P>Visiting Australian Prime Minister John Howard also expressed his=20
indignation. "Anything of that kind would be totally repugnant to =
civilized=20
countries," he told reporters in Canada.</P></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C67B93.43C571E0--
.
|
|
| User: "thelasian" |
|
| Title: Re: Religion of peace. Chuckle-chuckle |
20 May 2006 01:22:46 AM |
|
|
<strong>THIS STORY NOT TRUE!</strong>
Iran: Lawmakers Debate Women's Clothing
Associated Press May 20, 2006
.... Emad Afroogh, the legislator who sponsored the bill and is chairman
of Parliament's Cultural Committee, said that the Canadian report was
untrue and that the measure sought only to make women dress more
conservatively and avoid Western fashions.<strong> Another lawmaker,
Morris Motamed, a Jew, also said the Canadian report was
false.</strong>
<strong>ALSO NOT TRUE</strong> Holocaust "historian" Edwin Black
claimed that Iran was responsible for the <a
href="http://www.bankingonbaghdad.com/archive/IranDenial/WJW122205/">Holocaust.</a>
But see <a
href="http://www.iranian.com/AbbasMilani/2006/February/Black/index.html">Iran,
Jews and the Holocaust: An answer to Mr. Black</a> by Dr Abbas Milani
of Stanford University.
More about Jews of Iran:
1- Jews in Iran Describe a Life of Freedom, Christian Science Monitor,
February 03, 1998
(http://csmonitor.com/cgi-bin/durableRedirect.pl?/durable/1998/02/03/intl/intl.3.html)
2- Polish Jews were given refuge in Iran during WWII
Associated Press
Thursday, November 23, 2000
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A53268-2000Nov22?language=printer)
3- Iranian Jews PREFER Tehran to Tel-Aviv, Jerusalem Post Nov. 3, 2005
(http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1131043721479&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "mkufjg" |
|
| Title: Re: Religion of peace. Chuckle-chuckle |
20 May 2006 12:16:16 AM |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0057_01C67B91.D2D0C710
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I doubt there are enough Jews in Iran to be making such a big deal out =
of this!!!
"dreamwalker" <backfromthe@dead.com> wrote in message =
news:c35$446e8c66$407626e1$32212@powerweb.allthenewsgroups.com...
Iran to force non-Muslims to wear colored badges in public, if true, =
would be "despicable" reminders of Nazi Germany's persecution of the =
Jews, a US spokesman said. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack =
said he had not seen details of the reports, which prompted expressions =
of concern from the prime ministers of Canada and Australia after they =
appeared in a Canadian newspaper.
But McCormack added, "If you did have such an occurrence, whether it =
was in Iran or elsewhere, it would certainly be despicable."
"I think it has clear echoes of Germany under Hitler," he said, =
referring to Nazi dictator who presided over the extermination of six =
million Jews before and during World War II.
A Jewish member of the Iranian parliament categorically denied the =
report in Canada's National Post that a law passed this week would force =
Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians to wear yellow, red or blue strips of =
cloth respectively.
"This report is a complete fabrication and totally false," Maurice =
Motammed told AFP in Tehran. "It is a lie and the people who made it up =
were aiming to exploit it politically."
Iran's new hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had already come in =
for widespread criticism for suggesting that the Holocaust was a myth =
and calling for=20
Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper said he had only seen reports =
about the badge law but added, "Unfortunately, we have seen enough =
already from the Iranian regime to suggest that it is very capable of =
this kind of action."
Visiting Australian Prime Minister John Howard also expressed his =
indignation. "Anything of that kind would be totally repugnant to =
civilized countries," he told reporters in Canada.
------=_NextPart_000_0057_01C67B91.D2D0C710
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2873" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I doubt there are enough Jews in Iran =
to be making=20
such a big deal out of this!!!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"dreamwalker" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:backfromthe@dead.com">backfromthe@dead.com</A>> =
wrote in=20
message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:c35$446e8c66$407626e1$32212@powerweb.allthenewsgroups.com">n=
ews:c35$446e8c66$407626e1$32212@powerweb.allthenewsgroups.com</A>...</DIV=
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN class=3Dyqlink>
<P>
<FORM class=3Dyqin action=3Dhttp://yq.search.yahoo.com/search=20
method=3Dpost><STRONG></STRONG> </FORM></P>
<P></SPAN>Iran to force non-Muslims to wear colored badges in public, =
if true,=20
would be "despicable" reminders of Nazi Germany's persecution of the =
Jews, a=20
US spokesman said. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said he =
had not=20
seen details of the reports, which prompted expressions of concern =
from the=20
prime ministers of Canada and Australia after they appeared in a =
Canadian=20
newspaper.</P>
<P>But McCormack added, "If you did have such an occurrence, whether =
it was in=20
Iran or elsewhere, it would certainly be despicable."</P>
<P>"I think it has clear echoes of Germany under Hitler," he said, =
referring=20
to Nazi dictator who presided over the extermination of six million =
Jews=20
before and during World War II.</P>
<P>A Jewish member of the Iranian parliament categorically denied the =
report=20
in Canada's National Post that a law passed this week would force =
Jews,=20
Christians and Zoroastrians to wear yellow, red or blue strips of =
cloth=20
respectively.</P>
<P>"This report is a complete fabrication and totally false," Maurice =
Motammed=20
told AFP in Tehran. "It is a lie and the people who made it up were =
aiming to=20
exploit it politically."</P>
<P>Iran's new hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had already come =
in for=20
widespread criticism for suggesting that the Holocaust was a myth and =
calling=20
for=20
<FORM class=3Dyqin action=3Dhttp://yq.search.yahoo.com/search =
method=3Dpost>Canadian=20
Prime Minister Stephen Harper said he had only seen reports about the =
badge=20
law but added, "Unfortunately, we have seen enough already from the =
Iranian=20
regime to suggest that it is very capable of this kind of =
action."</FORM></P>
<P>Visiting Australian Prime Minister John Howard also expressed his=20
indignation. "Anything of that kind would be totally repugnant to =
civilized=20
countries," he told reporters in=20
Canada.</P></FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0057_01C67B91.D2D0C710--
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "WH" |
|
| Title: Re: Religion of peace. Chuckle-chuckle |
20 May 2006 09:33:58 AM |
|
|
dreamwalker wrote:
Iran to force non-Muslims to wear colored badges in public, if true, would be "despicable" reminders of Nazi Germany's persecution of the Jews, a US spokesman said. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said he had not seen details of the reports, which prompted expressions of concern from the prime ministers of Canada and Australia after they appeared in a Canadian newspaper.
But McCormack added, "If you did have such an occurrence, whether it was in Iran or elsewhere, it would certainly be despicable."
"I think it has clear echoes of Germany under Hitler," he said, referring to Nazi dictator who presided over the extermination of six million Jews before and during World War II.
A Jewish member of the Iranian parliament categorically denied the report in Canada's National Post that a law passed this week would force Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians to wear yellow, red or blue strips of cloth respectively.
"This report is a complete fabrication and totally false," Maurice Motammed told AFP in Tehran. "It is a lie and the people who made it up were aiming to exploit it politically."
Iran's new hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had already come in for widespread criticism for suggesting that the Holocaust was a myth and calling for
Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper said he had only seen reports about the badge law but added, "Unfortunately, we have seen enough already from the Iranian regime to suggest that it is very capable of this kind of action."
Visiting Australian Prime Minister John Howard also expressed his indignation. "Anything of that kind would be totally repugnant to civilized countries," he told reporters in Canada.
------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C67B93.43C571E0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Google-AttachSize: 2369
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2873" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=yqlink>
<P>
<FORM class=yqin action=http://yq.search.yahoo.com/search
method=post><STRONG></STRONG> </FORM></P>
<P></SPAN>Iran to force non-Muslims to wear colored badges in public, if true,
would be "despicable" reminders of Nazi Germany's persecution of the Jews, a US
spokesman said. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said he had not seen
details of the reports, which prompted expressions of concern from the prime
ministers of Canada and Australia after they appeared in a Canadian
newspaper.</P>
<P>But McCormack added, "If you did have such an occurrence, whether it was in
Iran or elsewhere, it would certainly be despicable."</P>
<P>"I think it has clear echoes of Germany under Hitler," he said, referring to
Nazi dictator who presided over the extermination of six million Jews before and
during World War II.</P>
<P>A Jewish member of the Iranian parliament categorically denied the report in
Canada's National Post that a law passed this week would force Jews, Christians
and Zoroastrians to wear yellow, red or blue strips of cloth respectively.</P>
<P>"This report is a complete fabrication and totally false," Maurice Motammed
told AFP in Tehran. "It is a lie and the people who made it up were aiming to
exploit it politically."</P>
<P>Iran's new hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had already come in for
widespread criticism for suggesting that the Holocaust was a myth and calling
for
<FORM class=yqin action=http://yq.search.yahoo.com/search method=post>Canadian
Prime Minister Stephen Harper said he had only seen reports about the badge law
but added, "Unfortunately, we have seen enough already from the Iranian regime
to suggest that it is very capable of this kind of action."</FORM></P>
<P>Visiting Australian Prime Minister John Howard also expressed his
indignation. "Anything of that kind would be totally repugnant to civilized
countries," he told reporters in Canada.
Rubbish! I can imagine the stupid yanks starting a stupid propaganda
report like this but Canadian and Aussie's surprises me!
WH
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: Religion of peace. Chuckle-chuckle |
20 May 2006 11:15:01 AM |
|
|
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1148135638.491491.177950@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
dreamwalker wrote:
Iran to force non-Muslims to wear colored badges in public, if true,
would be "despicable" reminders of Nazi Germany's persecution of the
Jews, a US spokesman said. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said
he had not seen details of the reports, which prompted expressions of
concern from the prime ministers of Canada and Australia after they
appeared in a Canadian newspaper.
But McCormack added, "If you did have such an occurrence, whether it was
in Iran or elsewhere, it would certainly be despicable."
"I think it has clear echoes of Germany under Hitler," he said, referring
to Nazi dictator who presided over the extermination of six million Jews
before and during World War II.
A Jewish member of the Iranian parliament categorically denied the report
in Canada's National Post that a law passed this week would force Jews,
Christians and Zoroastrians to wear yellow, red or blue strips of cloth
respectively.
"This report is a complete fabrication and totally false," Maurice
Motammed told AFP in Tehran. "It is a lie and the people who made it up
were aiming to exploit it politically."
Iran's new hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had already come in for
widespread criticism for suggesting that the Holocaust was a myth and
calling for
Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper said he had only seen reports
about the badge law but added, "Unfortunately, we have seen enough
already from the Iranian regime to suggest that it is very capable of
this kind of action."
Visiting Australian Prime Minister John Howard also expressed his
indignation. "Anything of that kind would be totally repugnant to
civilized countries," he told reporters in Canada.
------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C67B93.43C571E0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Google-AttachSize: 2369
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2873" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=yqlink>
<P>
<FORM class=yqin action=http://yq.search.yahoo.com/search
method=post><STRONG></STRONG> </FORM></P>
<P></SPAN>Iran to force non-Muslims to wear colored badges in public, if
true,
would be "despicable" reminders of Nazi Germany's persecution of the
Jews, a US
spokesman said. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said he had not
seen
details of the reports, which prompted expressions of concern from the
prime
ministers of Canada and Australia after they appeared in a Canadian
newspaper.</P>
<P>But McCormack added, "If you did have such an occurrence, whether it
was in
Iran or elsewhere, it would certainly be despicable."</P>
<P>"I think it has clear echoes of Germany under Hitler," he said,
referring to
Nazi dictator who presided over the extermination of six million Jews
before and
during World War II.</P>
<P>A Jewish member of the Iranian parliament categorically denied the
report in
Canada's National Post that a law passed this week would force Jews,
Christians
and Zoroastrians to wear yellow, red or blue strips of cloth
respectively.</P>
<P>"This report is a complete fabrication and totally false," Maurice
Motammed
told AFP in Tehran. "It is a lie and the people who made it up were
aiming to
exploit it politically."</P>
<P>Iran's new hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had already come in
for
widespread criticism for suggesting that the Holocaust was a myth and
calling
for
<FORM class=yqin action=http://yq.search.yahoo.com/search
method=post>Canadian
Prime Minister Stephen Harper said he had only seen reports about the
badge law
but added, "Unfortunately, we have seen enough already from the Iranian
regime
to suggest that it is very capable of this kind of action."</FORM></P>
<P>Visiting Australian Prime Minister John Howard also expressed his
indignation. "Anything of that kind would be totally repugnant to
civilized
countries," he told reporters in Canada.
Rubbish! I can imagine the stupid yanks starting a stupid propaganda
report like this but Canadian and Aussie's surprises me!
You automatically assume it is propaganda. Yet, I imagine if a report
surfaced that America would require Muslims to wear badges, you would take
it as face value. IMHO, the Iranians are more likely candidates. After
all, they have already forced women into chador.
It may or may not be propaganda. Time will tell.
Jane
WH
.
|
|
|
| User: "thelasian" |
|
| Title: Re: Religion of peace. Chuckle-chuckle |
20 May 2006 08:21:32 PM |
|
|
Iranian women since the revolution are better educated, constitue more
than 60 per cent of the university population, have better access to
health care, child care, and live longer than ever before. TOo bad they
can't all wear Gap Jeans like you do, you liberated Western woman. How
dare they wear chadors instead of using their bodies to sell cars and
washing machines, as in your advanced western culture? How dare their 9
year old girls not suffer from eating disorders, or aspire to insert
balloons under their chest muscles, as proof of their liberation!
LOL!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "dreamwalker" |
|
| Title: Re: Religion of peace. Chuckle-chuckle |
20 May 2006 08:48:48 PM |
|
|
"thelasian" <thelasian@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1148174492.631972.250830@j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Iranian women since the revolution are better educated, constitue more
than 60 per cent of the university population, have better access to
health care, child care, and live longer than ever before. TOo bad they
can't all wear Gap Jeans like you do, you liberated Western woman. How
dare they wear chadors instead of using their bodies to sell cars and
washing machines, as in your advanced western culture? How dare their 9
year old girls not suffer from eating disorders, or aspire to insert
balloons under their chest muscles, as proof of their liberation!
LOL!!
Yes, I understand western woman are bustin' down the gates to get into Iran. LOL
.
|
|
|
| User: "thelasian" |
|
| Title: Re: Religion of peace. Chuckle-chuckle |
21 May 2006 01:09:44 PM |
|
|
Make fun all you want. The fact is that women's bodies are used as
commodities in your "liberated" west. Whatever the problems of Iran,
you're in no position to point fingers. Now go wear your "push up bra"
and rub up against a washing machine for tv commercials. Go on, shoo!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: Religion of peace. Chuckle-chuckle |
21 May 2006 02:13:44 PM |
|
|
"thelasian" <thelasian@yahoo.com> Spat the Words
Make fun all you want. The fact is that women's bodies are used as
commodities in your "liberated" west. Whatever the problems of Iran,
you're in no position to point fingers. Now go wear your "push up bra"
and rub up against a washing machine for tv commercials. Go on, shoo!
You think there's no whores in Iran ? I'll bet you're wrong.
Every society on the planet has prostitution... oldest profession
known to mankind.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Religion of peace. Chuckle-chuckle |
22 May 2006 05:10:37 PM |
|
|
On 21 May 2006 11:09:44 -0700, "thelasian" <thelasian@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Make fun all you want. The fact is that women's bodies are used as
commodities in your "liberated" west. Whatever the problems of Iran,
you're in no position to point fingers. Now go wear your "push up bra"
and rub up against a washing machine for tv commercials. Go on, shoo!
Riiiight. And you, I'll bet you've *never* looked, gawked etc at the
women you describe above. How else would you even know what
a push-up bra is? Or better yet - how would you know to make fun
of it?
Dani
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: Religion of peace. Chuckle-chuckle |
20 May 2006 08:26:29 PM |
|
|
"thelasian" <thelasian@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1148174492.631972.250830@j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Iranian women since the revolution are better educated, constitue more
than 60 per cent of the university population, have better access to
health care, child care, and live longer than ever before. TOo bad they
can't all wear Gap Jeans like you do, you liberated Western woman. How
dare they wear chadors instead of using their bodies to sell cars and
washing machines, as in your advanced western culture? How dare their 9
year old girls not suffer from eating disorders, or aspire to insert
balloons under their chest muscles, as proof of their liberation!
LOL!!
How about allowing grown women to make their own choices?
Jane
.
|
|
|
| User: "WH" |
|
| Title: Re: Religion of peace. Chuckle-chuckle |
21 May 2006 01:43:26 PM |
|
|
Jane wrote:
"thelasian" <thelasian@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1148174492.631972.250830@j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Iranian women since the revolution are better educated, constitue more
than 60 per cent of the university population, have better access to
health care, child care, and live longer than ever before. TOo bad they
can't all wear Gap Jeans like you do, you liberated Western woman. How
dare they wear chadors instead of using their bodies to sell cars and
washing machines, as in your advanced western culture? How dare their 9
year old girls not suffer from eating disorders, or aspire to insert
balloons under their chest muscles, as proof of their liberation!
LOL!!
How about allowing grown women to make their own choices?
Jane
They choose to dress like that you fuckin' idiot!
WH
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: Religion of peace. Chuckle-chuckle |
21 May 2006 01:55:22 PM |
|
|
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1148237006.040174.72790@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Jane wrote:
"thelasian" <thelasian@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1148174492.631972.250830@j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Iranian women since the revolution are better educated, constitue more
than 60 per cent of the university population, have better access to
health care, child care, and live longer than ever before. TOo bad they
can't all wear Gap Jeans like you do, you liberated Western woman. How
dare they wear chadors instead of using their bodies to sell cars and
washing machines, as in your advanced western culture? How dare their 9
year old girls not suffer from eating disorders, or aspire to insert
balloons under their chest muscles, as proof of their liberation!
LOL!!
How about allowing grown women to make their own choices?
Jane
They choose to dress like that you fuckin' idiot!
Neither you nor your friend have answered why a law is required, if all
Iranian women choose to dress that way. It was just as wrong for the Shah,
or for Turkey, to ban Islamic dress as it is to enforce it. Women are not
children; they can make up their own minds.
Jane
WH
.
|
|
|
| User: "mkufjg" |
|
| Title: Re: Religion of peace. Chuckle-chuckle |
21 May 2006 08:30:57 PM |
|
|
Why are women not allowed to walk the street topless if the men can do
it...... ???
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:fI2cg.120$ho5.18150@news20.bellglobal.com...
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1148237006.040174.72790@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Jane wrote:
"thelasian" <thelasian@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1148174492.631972.250830@j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Iranian women since the revolution are better educated, constitue more
than 60 per cent of the university population, have better access to
health care, child care, and live longer than ever before. TOo bad
they
can't all wear Gap Jeans like you do, you liberated Western woman. How
dare they wear chadors instead of using their bodies to sell cars and
washing machines, as in your advanced western culture? How dare their
9
year old girls not suffer from eating disorders, or aspire to insert
balloons under their chest muscles, as proof of their liberation!
LOL!!
How about allowing grown women to make their own choices?
Jane
They choose to dress like that you fuckin' idiot!
Neither you nor your friend have answered why a law is required, if all
Iranian women choose to dress that way. It was just as wrong for the
Shah, or for Turkey, to ban Islamic dress as it is to enforce it. Women
are not children; they can make up their own minds.
Jane
WH
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Religion of peace. Chuckle-chuckle |
21 May 2006 09:26:36 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 22 May 2006 01:30:57 +0000, mkufjg wrote:
Why are women not allowed to walk the street topless if the men can do
it...... ???
They are. (At least where I am).
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: Religion of peace. Chuckle-chuckle |
21 May 2006 10:00:18 PM |
|
|
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.05.22.02.26.36.270960@tepidmail.com...
On Mon, 22 May 2006 01:30:57 +0000, mkufjg wrote:
Why are women not allowed to walk the street topless if the men can do
it...... ???
They are. (At least where I am).
They are in Ontario, too. Most choose not to.
Jane
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "mkufjg" |
|
| Title: Re: Religion of peace. Chuckle-chuckle |
21 May 2006 11:56:07 PM |
|
|
In that case, many men want to walk around with their wee wees hanging out,
but can't!!!! Is it not opression?
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:SO9cg.233$ho5.27822@news20.bellglobal.com...
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.05.22.02.26.36.270960@tepidmail.com...
On Mon, 22 May 2006 01:30:57 +0000, mkufjg wrote:
Why are women not allowed to walk the street topless if the men can do
it...... ???
They are. (At least where I am).
They are in Ontario, too. Most choose not to.
Jane
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: Religion of peace. Chuckle-chuckle |
22 May 2006 05:56:49 AM |
|
|
"mkufjg" <ya@ca.ca> wrote in message news:Hvbcg.179901$7a.70409@pd7tw1no...
In that case, many men want to walk around with their wee wees hanging
out, but can't!!!! Is it not opression?
"wee wees"? Is that the scientific term?
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:SO9cg.233$ho5.27822@news20.bellglobal.com...
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.05.22.02.26.36.270960@tepidmail.com...
On Mon, 22 May 2006 01:30:57 +0000, mkufjg wrote:
Why are women not allowed to walk the street topless if the men can do
it...... ???
They are. (At least where I am).
They are in Ontario, too. Most choose not to.
Jane
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: Religion of peace. Chuckle-chuckle |
22 May 2006 07:33:43 PM |
|
|
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
"mkufjg" <ya@ca.ca> wrote in message news:Hvbcg.179901$7a.70409
@pd7tw1no...
In that case, many men want to walk around with their wee wees hanging
out, but can't!!!! Is it not opression?
"wee wees"? Is that the scientific term?
I think the technical term is 'moog moog' (uttered in a deep
masculine voice). Some men have chosen to call it a 'wee wee'
due to certain shortcomings they suffer.
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:SO9cg.233$ho5.27822@news20.bellglobal.com...
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.05.22.02.26.36.270960@tepidmail.com...
On Mon, 22 May 2006 01:30:57 +0000, mkufjg wrote:
Why are women not allowed to walk the street topless if the men can
do
it...... ???
They are. (At least where I am).
They are in Ontario, too. Most choose not to.
Jane
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: Religion of peace. Chuckle-chuckle |
21 May 2006 01:49:24 PM |
|
|
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1148237006.040174.72790@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Jane wrote:
"thelasian" <thelasian@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1148174492.631972.250830@j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Iranian women since the revolution are better educated, constitue more
than 60 per cent of the university population, have better access to
health care, child care, and live longer than ever before. TOo bad they
can't all wear Gap Jeans like you do, you liberated Western woman. How
dare they wear chadors instead of using their bodies to sell cars and
washing machines, as in your advanced western culture? How dare their 9
year old girls not suffer from eating disorders, or aspire to insert
balloons under their chest muscles, as proof of their liberation!
LOL!!
How about allowing grown women to make their own choices?
Jane
They choose to dress like that you fuckin' idiot!
Not all of them do, *****.
Jane
WH
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Religion of peace. Chuckle-chuckle |
21 May 2006 05:48:44 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 21 May 2006 11:43:26 -0700, WH wrote:
Jane wrote:
"thelasian" <thelasian@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1148174492.631972.250830@j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Iranian women since the revolution are better educated, constitue more
than 60 per cent of the university population, have better access to
health care, child care, and live longer than ever before. TOo bad they
can't all wear Gap Jeans like you do, you liberated Western woman. How
dare they wear chadors instead of using their bodies to sell cars and
washing machines, as in your advanced western culture? How dare their 9
year old girls not suffer from eating disorders, or aspire to insert
balloons under their chest muscles, as proof of their liberation!
LOL!!
How about allowing grown women to make their own choices?
Jane
They choose to dress like that you fuckin' idiot!
WH
Um .... actually, they are forced to wear the veil. This is true in both
Iran and Saudi Arabia. I don't think women in Saudi Arabia even try to
get away without it, but there were reports shortly after sharia was
imposed in Iran (1980s) about women being arrested for failing to wear the
veil in Iran. They went for many, many years without this requirement,
and the women mostly did not choose to wear burqas when the law was not
in place.
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "thelasian" |
|
| Title: Re: Religion of peace. Chuckle-chuckle |
21 May 2006 01:18:09 PM |
|
|
Note how you ssume that women are being "forced" to dress that way. Has
it ever occurred to you that Iranian women dress the way they dress not
because of the Evil Males Moslems Who SUpress Women's Liberation, but
because that's their culture, and for the vast majority, wearing their
outfits is no different than you wearing your outfit?
Not so long ago, do-goodie "We know better than you what's good for
you" Victorians went to india and condemned the women there as being
"backward and oppressed" because they wore nose-rings and didn't
cover-up their bodies enough. Now, more ethnocentric people like you
are in the name of "feminism" enforcing your Western consumer culture
on others too. Every society has its own ideas of clothing, and
everyone in that society is raised to respect those limits.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: Religion of peace. Chuckle-chuckle |
21 May 2006 01:43:28 PM |
|
|
"thelasian" <thelasian@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1148235489.734166.225870@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Note how you ssume that women are being "forced" to dress that way.
If not, then why do they need a law?
Has
it ever occurred to you that Iranian women dress the way they dress not
because of the Evil Males Moslems Who SUpress Women's Liberation, but
because that's their culture, and for the vast majority, wearing their
outfits is no different than you wearing your outfit?
Except Iranian women DID NOT dress like that in the not-so-distant past. I
have no problem with those who wish to dress that way....good for them. Let
it be THEIR choice, however.
Not so long ago, do-goodie "We know better than you what's good for
you" Victorians went to india and condemned the women there as being
"backward and oppressed" because they wore nose-rings and didn't
cover-up their bodies enough. Now, more ethnocentric people like you
are in the name of "feminism" enforcing your Western consumer culture
on others too. Every society has its own ideas of clothing, and
everyone in that society is raised to respect those limits.
Fine, then remove the law that states they must dress that way and if they
all still do, I'll eat my words.
Jane
.
|
|
|
| User: "mkufjg" |
|
| Title: Re: Religion of peace. Chuckle-chuckle |
21 May 2006 08:14:20 PM |
|
|
Some corporations do not allow men to wear earings.... did you know that?
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5x2cg.117$ho5.18135@news20.bellglobal.com...
"thelasian" <thelasian@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1148235489.734166.225870@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Note how you ssume that women are being "forced" to dress that way.
If not, then why do they need a law?
Has
it ever occurred to you that Iranian women dress the way they dress not
because of the Evil Males Moslems Who SUpress Women's Liberation, but
because that's their culture, and for the vast majority, wearing their
outfits is no different than you wearing your outfit?
Except Iranian women DID NOT dress like that in the not-so-distant past.
I have no problem with those who wish to dress that way....good for them.
Let it be THEIR choice, however.
Not so long ago, do-goodie "We know better than you what's good for
you" Victorians went to india and condemned the women there as being
"backward and oppressed" because they wore nose-rings and didn't
cover-up their bodies enough. Now, more ethnocentric people like you
are in the name of "feminism" enforcing your Western consumer culture
on others too. Every society has its own ideas of clothing, and
everyone in that society is raised to respect those limits.
Fine, then remove the law that states they must dress that way and if they
all still do, I'll eat my words.
Jane
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: Religion of peace. Chuckle-chuckle |
21 May 2006 10:02:56 PM |
|
|
"mkufjg" <ya@ca.ca> wrote in message news:Mf8cg.179690$7a.16950@pd7tw1no...
Some corporations do not allow men to wear earings.... did you know that?
So? If earrings mean that much to you, don't work there! A private company
(or home) is not the same as the law of the land.
I know you are just trolling, as usual.
Jane
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5x2cg.117$ho5.18135@news20.bellglobal.com...
"thelasian" <thelasian@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1148235489.734166.225870@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Note how you ssume that women are being "forced" to dress that way.
If not, then why do they need a law?
Has
it ever occurred to you that Iranian women dress the way they dress not
because of the Evil Males Moslems Who SUpress Women's Liberation, but
because that's their culture, and for the vast majority, wearing their
outfits is no different than you wearing your outfit?
Except Iranian women DID NOT dress like that in the not-so-distant past.
I have no problem with those who wish to dress that way....good for them.
Let it be THEIR choice, however.
Not so long ago, do-goodie "We know better than you what's good for
you" Victorians went to india and condemned the women there as being
"backward and oppressed" because they wore nose-rings and didn't
cover-up their bodies enough. Now, more ethnocentric people like you
are in the name of "feminism" enforcing your Western consumer culture
on others too. Every society has its own ideas of clothing, and
everyone in that society is raised to respect those limits.
Fine, then remove the law that states they must dress that way and if
they all still do, I'll eat my words.
Jane
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: Religion of peace. Chuckle-chuckle |
22 May 2006 01:43:16 AM |
|
|
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
"mkufjg" <ya@ca.ca> wrote in message
news:Mf8cg.179690$7a.16950@pd7tw1no...
Some corporations do not allow men to wear earings.... did you know
that?
So? If earrings mean that much to you, don't work there! A private
company (or home) is not the same as the law of the land.
I know you are just trolling, as usual.
Trolling... trying to draw comparison between being forced to
wear head-coverings and not being allowed to wear earrings, or
not being allowed to walk around naked. The comparison is a little
bit stretched.
I think in many parts of the US it actually is illegal to walk
around naked, or for women to walk around topless, in public.
These tend to be local or state laws.
Jane
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5x2cg.117$ho5.18135@news20.bellglobal.com...
"thelasian" <thelasian@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1148235489.734166.225870@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Note how you ssume that women are being "forced" to dress that way.
If not, then why do they need a law?
Has
it ever occurred to you that Iranian women dress the way they dress
not because of the Evil Males Moslems Who SUpress Women's Liberation,
but because that's their culture, and for the vast majority, wearing
their outfits is no different than you wearing your outfit?
Except Iranian women DID NOT dress like that in the not-so-distant
past. I have no problem with those who wish to dress that way....good
for them. Let it be THEIR choice, however.
Not so long ago, do-goodie "We know better than you what's good for
you" Victorians went to india and condemned the women there as being
"backward and oppressed" because they wore nose-rings and didn't
cover-up their bodies enough. Now, more ethnocentric people like you
are in the name of "feminism" enforcing your Western consumer culture
on others too. Every society has its own ideas of clothing, and
everyone in that society is raised to respect those limits.
Fine, then remove the law that states they must dress that way and if
they all still do, I'll eat my words.
Jane
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: Religion of peace. Chuckle-chuckle |
22 May 2006 06:00:21 AM |
|
|
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns97CB7561439Crrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
"mkufjg" <ya@ca.ca> wrote in message
news:Mf8cg.179690$7a.16950@pd7tw1no...
Some corporations do not allow men to wear earings.... did you know
that?
So? If earrings mean that much to you, don't work there! A private
company (or home) is not the same as the law of the land.
I know you are just trolling, as usual.
Trolling... trying to draw comparison between being forced to
wear head-coverings and not being allowed to wear earrings, or
not being allowed to walk around naked. The comparison is a little
bit stretched.
I think in many parts of the US it actually is illegal to walk
around naked, or for women to walk around topless, in public.
These tend to be local or state laws.
It was illegal for women to go topless in Ontario until about 10(?) years
ago, when a woman went topless in order to challenge the law and won her
case. There were topless women in the news for a while, until everyone got
over it. Some places have passed local bi-laws to forbid it in certain
parts of town. Most women choose to keep their tops on.
Jane
Jane
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5x2cg.117$ho5.18135@news20.bellglobal.com...
"thelasian" <thelasian@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1148235489.734166.225870@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Note how you ssume that women are being "forced" to dress that way.
If not, then why do they need a law?
Has
it ever occurred to you that Iranian women dress the way they dress
not because of the Evil Males Moslems Who SUpress Women's Liberation,
but because that's their culture, and for the vast majority, wearing
their outfits is no different than you wearing your outfit?
Except Iranian women DID NOT dress like that in the not-so-distant
past. I have no problem with those who wish to dress that way....good
for them. Let it be THEIR choice, however.
Not so long ago, do-goodie "We know better than you what's good for
you" Victorians went to india and condemned the women there as being
"backward and oppressed" because they wore nose-rings and didn't
cover-up their bodies enough. Now, more ethnocentric people like you
are in the name of "feminism" enforcing your Western consumer culture
on others too. Every society has its own ideas of clothing, and
everyone in that society is raised to respect those limits.
Fine, then remove the law that states they must dress that way and if
they all still do, I'll eat my words.
Jane
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Religion of peace. Chuckle-chuckle |
22 May 2006 04:13:50 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 22 May 2006 01:43:16 -0500, Perseid wrote:
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
"mkufjg" <ya@ca.ca> wrote in message
news:Mf8cg.179690$7a.16950@pd7tw1no...
Some corporations do not allow men to wear earings.... did you know
that?
So? If earrings mean that much to you, don't work there! A private
company (or home) is not the same as the law of the land.
I know you are just trolling, as usual.
Trolling... trying to draw comparison between being forced to
wear head-coverings and not being allowed to wear earrings, or
not being allowed to walk around naked. The comparison is a little
bit stretched.
I think in many parts of the US it actually is illegal to walk
around naked, or for women to walk around topless, in public.
These tend to be local or state laws.
I think it would be very interesting to have someone challenge these laws
all the way to the Supreme Court, assuming that men are permitted in these
jurisdictions to go topless.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: Religion of peace. Chuckle-chuckle |
22 May 2006 07:13:27 PM |
|
|
Woodswun <woodswun@tepidmail.com> Spat the Words
On Mon, 22 May 2006 01:43:16 -0500, Perseid wrote:
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
"mkufjg" <ya@ca.ca> wrote in message
news:Mf8cg.179690$7a.16950@pd7tw1no...
Some corporations do not allow men to wear earings.... did you know
that?
So? If earrings mean that much to you, don't work there! A private
company (or home) is not the same as the law of the land.
I know you are just trolling, as usual.
Trolling... trying to draw comparison between being forced to
wear head-coverings and not being allowed to wear earrings, or
not being allowed to walk around naked. The comparison is a little
bit stretched.
I think in many parts of the US it actually is illegal to walk
around naked, or for women to walk around topless, in public.
These tend to be local or state laws.
I think it would be very interesting to have someone challenge these laws
all the way to the Supreme Court, assuming that men are permitted in
these
jurisdictions to go topless.
Most guys wouldn't complain if you want to walk around jiggling
your breasts in public. :->
I think it would be women who would be complaining, along with
the prudes and some ultra-moral individuals.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Religion of peace. Chuckle-chuckle |
23 May 2006 04:26:50 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 22 May 2006 19:13:27 -0500, Perseid wrote:
Woodswun <woodswun@tepidmail.com> Spat the Words
On Mon, 22 May 2006 01:43:16 -0500, Perseid wrote:
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
"mkufjg" <ya@ca.ca> wrote in message
news:Mf8cg.179690$7a.16950@pd7tw1no...
Some corporations do not allow men to wear earings.... did you know
that?
So? If earrings mean that much to you, don't work there! A private
company (or home) is not the same as the law of the land.
I know you are just trolling, as usual.
Trolling... trying to draw comparison between being forced to
wear head-coverings and not being allowed to wear earrings, or
not being allowed to walk around naked. The comparison is a little
bit stretched.
I think in many parts of the US it actually is illegal to walk
around naked, or for women to walk around topless, in public.
These tend to be local or state laws.
I think it would be very interesting to have someone challenge these laws
all the way to the Supreme Court, assuming that men are permitted in
these
jurisdictions to go topless.
Most guys wouldn't complain if you want to walk around jiggling
your breasts in public. :->
I'm sure the guys who used to hang around at the stage coach station for
a glimpse of an ankle would have assumed that ankles would always remain
an erotic part of the feminine form. Who'd a thunk that by making it no
big deal to display it would become ... no big deal? ;-)
I think it would be women who would be complaining, along with the
prudes and some ultra-moral individuals.
For a while, probably, but after that, they probably wouldn't be viewed
any differently than elbows, ankles or knees are now. What makes female
breasts erotic is the fact that they are hidden because they are
*considered* erotic. They're just a food source, same as a cow's
udders, and I don't see why people make such a huge deal about 'em. It's
really silly, IMHO.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "mkufjg" |
|
| Title: Re: Religion of peace. Chuckle-chuckle |
23 May 2006 05:49:42 PM |
|
|
What makes female
breasts erotic is the fact that they are hidden because they are
*considered* erotic.
Just think how erotic Muslem women must be, since they are all 'hidden', as
you worded it...
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.05.23.21.26.49.394117@tepidmail.com...
On Mon, 22 May 2006 19:13:27 -0500, Perseid wrote:
Woodswun <woodswun@tepidmail.com> Spat the Words
On Mon, 22 May 2006 01:43:16 -0500, Perseid wrote:
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
"mkufjg" <ya@ca.ca> wrote in message
news:Mf8cg.179690$7a.16950@pd7tw1no...
Some corporations do not allow men to wear earings.... did you know
that?
So? If earrings mean that much to you, don't work there! A private
company (or home) is not the same as the law of the land.
I know you are just trolling, as usual.
Trolling... trying to draw comparison between being forced to
wear head-coverings and not being allowed to wear earrings, or
not being allowed to walk around naked. The comparison is a little
bit stretched.
I think in many parts of the US it actually is illegal to walk
around naked, or for women to walk around topless, in public.
These tend to be local or state laws.
I think it would be very interesting to have someone challenge these
laws
all the way to the Supreme Court, assuming that men are permitted in
these
jurisdictions to go topless.
Most guys wouldn't complain if you want to walk around jiggling
your breasts in public. :->
I'm sure the guys who used to hang around at the stage coach station for
a glimpse of an ankle would have assumed that ankles would always remain
an erotic part of the feminine form. Who'd a thunk that by making it no
big deal to display it would become ... no big deal? ;-)
I think it would be women who would be complaining, along with the
prudes and some ultra-moral individuals.
For a while, probably, but after that, they probably wouldn't be viewed
any differently than elbows, ankles or knees are now. What makes female
breasts erotic is the fact that they are hidden because they are
*considered* erotic. They're just a food source, same as a cow's
udders, and I don't see why people make such a huge deal about 'em. It's
really silly, IMHO.
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
