"Grantland" <mithril@iafrica.com> wrote in message
news:40487ca3.258444062@ct-news.iafrica.com...

tugbertswife@webtv.net (sUSAn B Anthony) wrote:

<Much Afrikaaner racial superiority crap deleted>

Humans and apes are so genetically close that they can mate and
produce offspring.

Eh? References please. Horses and donkeys have significantly less than 1%
different DNA, and their offspring are infertile. I've never seen any text
that
indicated human/ape (gorilla? chimp? orangutan?) cross species fertilisation
was possible *at all*. Prove it or *sit down and shut up*

An old photo of one, in the possession of the
Anthropological Institute of London, shows a creature which looks like
a monstrosity, being very much more ape-like than human.

But did it come from such a union? What proofs? If it's 19th century it
was
probably a hoax, (remember 'Piltdown Man'?) And no I'm not just going
to take your word for it, so your mission is to *prove*:
1) That interspecies impregnation between humans and at least one species of
ape is
a demonstrated fact.
2) That such offspring have been born.

Negroes or coloureds are counted as human for the purposes of this exercise.
If your claim of their nearer relationship to the ape for them is valid then
it's logical
to assume that they would be more likely to be able to fertilise each other
than a
white would right? (Leave out the mechanics - I don't think I really want
to know
how a Zulu or Matabele might go about seducing a Chimpanzee.)

Supply dates and locations and documented proofs of these claims.
Take your time, I have the rest of my life.
(Or yours)
Oh, if you can't do it, just post a retraction.

<snip>

if race-mixing Whites can ignore the maybe 1/2 of
1% difference between themselves and Blacks,

Ahem. You'll find the DNA difference between white and black, or indeed any
other colour/race group is *significantly* less than half of one percent, in
fact it's
of the same level as normal genetic variation *within* racial groups. It's
just another minor
trait, like colour in cats, or do you think a black cat is .5% genetically
different from
a white one?

You are attempting to lump blacks in with apes based on prejudice when you
could with
equal fairness lump whites in with apes and make the same statement. What
skin colour
does an Orangutan have anyway? (Hint: not black)

there would not be much
logic for them to use the other 1/2 of 1% difference between Blacks
and apes as an excuse for not mating with the latter, also.

Except that it's nothing like that big a difference mynheer.

How does such a thing grab you? Imagine a batch of half-apes sitting
on the Supreme Court. Or picture a near-ape as president of the United
States. Think what it would be like to have a hairy ape-like creature
as a grandchild. Then try to figure out how long our civilization
would last if all the "people" in our land resembled apes more than
humans. Wouldn't this be a fitting end for an egalitarian society?

Straw man. Irrelevant to any differences between blacks and whites (or
indeed any other Homo Sapiens
variant.) Skin colour is not a determinent for intellect, behaviour or
anything other than skin colour. Get over it.
If in doubt consult any breeder of animals that has different colours. Cats
for instance.
And go study some genetics for heavens sake, your differential DNA % between
black and white are beyond ridiculous.

Some will argue that while some negroes are mentally superior to some
Whites,

Doubtless, and the reverse is also true. What's your point?

apes are not superior to either. Not true.

Oh?

There are exceptions. What about mental retardation? There are some pitiful
cases, both white and negro (and, incidentally, the latter have a
higher rate of retardation than the former) who are so low on the
scale of idiocy that they can do nothing but lie all days and croak
like frogs. Wouldn't an ape be superior to one of these? Of course.

Sports and other genetic abberrations are not a valid basis for genetic
superiority
comparisons. That a 'normal' ape might be mentally superior to a human born
with
Downs or other genetic abberrations is irrelevant. You compare the mean of
each
with the other or do you not understand normal distribution in statistical
analysis of
data in addtion to not understanding basic genetics?

It will also be argued that we shouldn't mate with apes because they
are animals;

Not my personal interest. Bestiality is illegal just about everywhere but
there are
always some that find it kinky instead of repugnant.
Finding an ape prepared to hold still might be uh, 'interesting' to say the
least. Bear in
mind that humans have the largest penis in the primate kingdom, would you
really like
to upset a 500lb gorilla by painfully proving it to her?
What's your point?