Rice Recieves an A+ by Me ;)



 Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus > Rice Recieves an A+ by Me ;)

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus
User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald"
Date: 08 Apr 2004 09:46:40 PM
Object: Rice Recieves an A+ by Me ;)
Rice Recieves an A+
By Michael Johnathan McDonald
Thursday, April 8 , 6:36 PST
Michael Report - A great American leader stood up to another
Democratic witch hunt and high-tech lynching. Condoleezza Rice, the
National security adviser faced a lynch mob of Democrats in a comic
relief environment today.
Responding to accusations by political plants such as Richard Clark,
who gave a salacious testimony while selling his book at the Sept. 11
commission hearings, the Democrats called upon Rice to explain Clarks
accusations. The Witch hunt tried to blame George W. Bush who they
blame with full responsibility of September 11, 2001 terrorist
attacks.
The Democratic inquisition had their heads handed to them
metaphorically. It wasn't pretty. A brilliant honest American out did
the sly underhanded dealings of a commission willing to stand up for a
few September 11 victims to try to place the blame of America's worst
terrorist attack on the Bush administration. Not only were their lies
shot down, but also, a wound was manifest in them at the end of this
comic relief trial.
"Terrorists were at war with the U.S. and U.S. was not a war with
America, " Rice who drove the point home to a bunch of Democratic
witch hunters that had gathered for another high-tech lynching. The
Democrats called out Rice in order to destroy and blame the
Republicans in general, as is always the case. She destroyed them
instead and left them wounded ducks.
National security adviser Condoleezza Rice testified Thursday "there
was no silver bullet that could have prevented" the deadly terror
attacks of Sept. The Democrats called in Rice to answer question of
Richard Clarke, former terrorism aide, who had said he gave her
specific warning of an impending attack. Not only did Rice refute this
in the face of Democrats but showed that he was incompetent, a loose
cannon, a failed Clinton adviser and a person out of his mind and this
was her main point. Also, this is why she did not call upon him after
September 11, 2001.
Clark apology-blame game was irrelevant and Rice proved this morning
that he was full of lies. He wanted to be apart of the Bush
administration but Rice didn't want him because he was not qualified.
" He was not an expert of Afghanistan, he was not an expert of
Pakistan, and He was not an expert of Iraq, " Rice told the panel of
democratic witch hunters.
One of Clark statements was that on August 6, 2001 he had given a
warning of an impending terrorist attack that the Bush administration
should have acted upon. She said a classified briefing paper prepared
for the president on Aug. 6, 2001 was a "historical" document despite
its title: Bin Laden determined to attack inside the United States."
She further stated that the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center
where court records showed that Usama bin Laden called for a holy war
on America was never acted upon by Congress, or the prior
administration. She was implying this and looked at him as if to say -
what is your point?
She said it contained no "actionable" intelligence, meaning it lacked
information that would have alerted agencies to the imminent threat.
Further citing that the Democrats are a bunch of witch hunters,. "I'm
now convinced that while nothing in this strategy would have done
anything about 9-11, if we had in fact moved on the things that were
in the original memos that we got from our counterterrorism people, we
might have even gone off course," she said.
In another accusation, Clark said that Rice had never heard of
al'Qaeda terrorist organization. Then a lame democrate trying to pin
clark down read a document of one of the first national defense
meetings in which the new Bush administration discussed in January
2000 citing that 'al Qaeda was the main topic. CNN blasted right off
the bat with there coverage denying that any of Clarks accusations
were successfully refuted by Rice. The ever-so left-wing media thinks
Americans are as dumb as dirt.
A December 1999 al-Qaida plot to bomb Los Angeles International
Airport was accredited with Clinton " shacking the trees" meaning that
he was all over America stopping al-Qaida plots in another Clark
testimonial point two weeks ago.
Rice was brilliant showing how Clark was a now certified liar:"After
September 11, ***** Clarke sent us the after action report that had
been done after the Millennium Plot," Rice told the Commission. "And
their assessment was that Ressam had been caught by chance, "Rice
said. "It was because a very alert Customs agent named Diana Dean and
her colleague sensed something about Ressam," Rice explained.
Careful of not naming Bill Clinton, she used the prior administrations
game plan of judging the terrorists in courts that effectively sealed
documents so that the CIA, NSA, and DOD could not legally talk to each
other in an coordinated effort to battle terrorism.
Rice had to put up with bias statements of Richard Ben Veniste, a
holdover the prosecution of Whitewater hearings. Upon every question
to Rice, Veniste placed his own biasness opinions inside each
questions trying to get a response from Rice that would show democrats
were always the ones at the forefront on the battle of terrorism and
the Republicans were to take total blame for September 11,2001.
Veniste tried to call her a liar threatening to declassify the
document. Rice looked at him as if he was some stooped mental patient
who could not understand who he was dealing with. "Go ahead," it was
just recommendations to arm the Uzbekistans and other organizations
and was not a warning" rice said.
Veniste huffed and puffed looking as if he wanted to say - someone
stop this *****, this is not how it is supposed to go!
One of the great highlights is when the Veniste made his repeated
condescending-bias remarks about Republicans and then asking the
questions that he was sent for. This only showed that this was a comic
releaf segment and not real.
He would not let her finish her response because she was pointing out
that the prior administration was a disaster and only this
administration planned to do something about it, meaning that they did
plan attacks before September 11, 2001 on the world because they knew
that this terrorism thing had gone on for twenty-or-more years and
someone had to stand up instead of policies like Bill Clinton to shot
off a cruise missile to bomb an aspirin factory killing innocents to
try to scare the terrorists – this did not work. when
Ben-Veniste pressed her, interrupted her, deflected answers because he
could not handle the truth. Most of the time he could not handle the
response, so he almost screamed - shut up!
"I would like to finish my point," she said when he began speaking
while she was at every reply.
The Democrats were shown up as fools. Rice pointed out the Congress
did nothing all these years and showed no resolve. Everyone knew a war
was declared on America, but the Liberals pushed laws and rules so
that any administration was hamstrung to fight it. This was not what
the democrats wanted to hear and it really hurt them in the long run.
Who are they trying to fool? Americans are smart enough to decode the
bullish lies that were used in this commission.
Asked that there was work of Arabs training in flight schools why the
Republican administration did not thing she said that the Democrats
told us that if you pick-out Arabs and question them then you are
racists as we always thought you were. So, citing this democratic
agenda, she said " What could we have done?" Clearly racial profiling
is not allowed by the top democrats in government that run the media.
"The structure and legal implications did not allow us to pursuer the
terrorists, " Rice said, alluding to democratic politically correct
laws and pressures of profiling any foreigners.
Rice had placed a solution to the terrorist problems, yet all these
'structure and legal implications' forced on the U.S. by the democrats
made it impossible to mount a real attack on global terrorism. " We
must act in Bold, Decisive and offence manner" if were are going to
defeat the terrorists. The democrats did not think that their stupidly
was going to be spotlighted in such a way as it was today. The
Left-wing media is doing all it can to spin and suppress the great
comments of this special great American at this moment.
To sum it all up, Rice's theme overshadowed the small Clark lies that
she repudiated with brilliance. The Bureaucracy (political correctness
and non-sharing of information by Clinton judicial precedence on
terrorists) created by the left-wing in this country is not conducive
to fighting a war - any war, against anyone. In essence, in a
atmosphere of being called a racist by the left, one cannot search
people suspected on being a terrorist. The Arabs training in flight
school could not have been stopped and searched because the fear of
the left-wing would have said that all hell has broken out and the
racist fascists have taken over. In fact, Rice said that this fear has
run -over into the intelligence community not wanting to take on tasks
as these because of this same fear of the left-wing. It is the
left-wing who are responsible and the President of the United States
really began planning a attack on other arab countries right when he
got into the White House because he was tired of letting the terrorist
attack U.S. targets all over the world periodically.
Rice also said that the Congress is part of the blame as well because
they did nothing for eight years after the first World trade Center
was targeted by international terrorist known leader Usama bin Laden.
They did not declare war, in which under any circumstance would be the
case, so they remained complacent. This clarification was made to show
why the Bush administration had began behind the doors to take an
offensive against global terrorism.
The democrats, once again, were exposed as lesser than intelligent or
loyal. All they had to do after September 11, 2001 was to say to the
republicans lets join forces and go to all out war. Instead they
called for this comic relief inquisition and received a lesson in
return. The only drawback is that this lesson dealt to the left-wing
will go unheeded, because they don't have the capacity to understand
the lesson. Condoleezza Rice tried her best to show them how they are
wrong, yet their conceded and arrogant manners has blinded them.
Blinded was another key work she used in her testimony, that showed
her in a light of being one of the great people of our generation.
By Michael Johnathan McDonald
Thursday, April 8 , 6:36 PST
Raw Data: Full Hearing Transcript The following is the full text of
Condoleezza Rice's testimony before the National Commission on
Terrorist Attacks on April 8, 2004: Can Be accessed at Fox News or My
site
http://www.MichaelReport.com
.

User: "dreamwalker"

Title: Re: Rice Recieves an A+ by Me ;) 10 Apr 2004 12:20:19 AM
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dd3256f0.0404081846.6091acd9@posting.google.com...

Rice Recieves an A+

By Michael Johnathan McDonald

Thursday, April 8 , 6:36 PST

Michael Report - A great American leader stood up to another
Democratic witch hunt and high-tech lynching. Condoleezza Rice, the
National security adviser faced a lynch mob of Democrats in a comic
relief environment today.

Responding to accusations by political plants such as Richard Clark,
who gave a salacious testimony while selling his book at the Sept. 11
commission hearings, the Democrats called upon Rice to explain Clarks
accusations. The Witch hunt tried to blame George W. Bush who they
blame with full responsibility of September 11, 2001 terrorist
attacks.

The Democratic inquisition had their heads handed to them
metaphorically. It wasn't pretty. A brilliant honest American out did
the sly underhanded dealings of a commission willing to stand up for a
few September 11 victims to try to place the blame of America's worst
terrorist attack on the Bush administration. Not only were their lies
shot down, but also, a wound was manifest in them at the end of this
comic relief trial.

"Terrorists were at war with the U.S. and U.S. was not a war with
America, " Rice who drove the point home to a bunch of Democratic
witch hunters that had gathered for another high-tech lynching. The
Democrats called out Rice in order to destroy and blame the
Republicans in general, as is always the case. She destroyed them
instead and left them wounded ducks.

National security adviser Condoleezza Rice testified Thursday "there
was no silver bullet that could have prevented" the deadly terror
attacks of Sept. The Democrats called in Rice to answer question of
Richard Clarke, former terrorism aide, who had said he gave her
specific warning of an impending attack. Not only did Rice refute this
in the face of Democrats but showed that he was incompetent, a loose
cannon, a failed Clinton adviser and a person out of his mind and this
was her main point. Also, this is why she did not call upon him after
September 11, 2001.

Clark apology-blame game was irrelevant and Rice proved this morning
that he was full of lies. He wanted to be apart of the Bush
administration but Rice didn't want him because he was not qualified.
" He was not an expert of Afghanistan, he was not an expert of
Pakistan, and He was not an expert of Iraq, " Rice told the panel of
democratic witch hunters.

One of Clark statements was that on August 6, 2001 he had given a
warning of an impending terrorist attack that the Bush administration
should have acted upon. She said a classified briefing paper prepared
for the president on Aug. 6, 2001 was a "historical" document despite
its title: Bin Laden determined to attack inside the United States."
She further stated that the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center
where court records showed that Usama bin Laden called for a holy war
on America was never acted upon by Congress, or the prior
administration. She was implying this and looked at him as if to say -
what is your point?

She said it contained no "actionable" intelligence, meaning it lacked
information that would have alerted agencies to the imminent threat.
Further citing that the Democrats are a bunch of witch hunters,. "I'm
now convinced that while nothing in this strategy would have done
anything about 9-11, if we had in fact moved on the things that were
in the original memos that we got from our counterterrorism people, we
might have even gone off course," she said.

In another accusation, Clark said that Rice had never heard of
al'Qaeda terrorist organization. Then a lame democrate trying to pin
clark down read a document of one of the first national defense
meetings in which the new Bush administration discussed in January
2000 citing that 'al Qaeda was the main topic. CNN blasted right off
the bat with there coverage denying that any of Clarks accusations
were successfully refuted by Rice. The ever-so left-wing media thinks
Americans are as dumb as dirt.

A December 1999 al-Qaida plot to bomb Los Angeles International
Airport was accredited with Clinton " shacking the trees" meaning that
he was all over America stopping al-Qaida plots in another Clark
testimonial point two weeks ago.

Rice was brilliant showing how Clark was a now certified liar:"After
September 11, ***** Clarke sent us the after action report that had
been done after the Millennium Plot," Rice told the Commission. "And
their assessment was that Ressam had been caught by chance, "Rice
said. "It was because a very alert Customs agent named Diana Dean and
her colleague sensed something about Ressam," Rice explained.

Careful of not naming Bill Clinton, she used the prior administrations
game plan of judging the terrorists in courts that effectively sealed
documents so that the CIA, NSA, and DOD could not legally talk to each
other in an coordinated effort to battle terrorism.

Rice had to put up with bias statements of Richard Ben Veniste, a
holdover the prosecution of Whitewater hearings. Upon every question
to Rice, Veniste placed his own biasness opinions inside each
questions trying to get a response from Rice that would show democrats
were always the ones at the forefront on the battle of terrorism and
the Republicans were to take total blame for September 11,2001.

Veniste tried to call her a liar threatening to declassify the
document. Rice looked at him as if he was some stooped mental patient
who could not understand who he was dealing with. "Go ahead," it was
just recommendations to arm the Uzbekistans and other organizations
and was not a warning" rice said.

Veniste huffed and puffed looking as if he wanted to say - someone
stop this *****, this is not how it is supposed to go!

One of the great highlights is when the Veniste made his repeated
condescending-bias remarks about Republicans and then asking the
questions that he was sent for. This only showed that this was a comic
releaf segment and not real.

He would not let her finish her response because she was pointing out
that the prior administration was a disaster and only this
administration planned to do something about it, meaning that they did
plan attacks before September 11, 2001 on the world because they knew
that this terrorism thing had gone on for twenty-or-more years and
someone had to stand up instead of policies like Bill Clinton to shot
off a cruise missile to bomb an aspirin factory killing innocents to
try to scare the terrorists &#8211; this did not work. when
Ben-Veniste pressed her, interrupted her, deflected answers because he
could not handle the truth. Most of the time he could not handle the
response, so he almost screamed - shut up!

"I would like to finish my point," she said when he began speaking
while she was at every reply.

The Democrats were shown up as fools. Rice pointed out the Congress
did nothing all these years and showed no resolve. Everyone knew a war
was declared on America, but the Liberals pushed laws and rules so
that any administration was hamstrung to fight it. This was not what
the democrats wanted to hear and it really hurt them in the long run.
Who are they trying to fool? Americans are smart enough to decode the
bullish lies that were used in this commission.

Asked that there was work of Arabs training in flight schools why the
Republican administration did not thing she said that the Democrats
told us that if you pick-out Arabs and question them then you are
racists as we always thought you were. So, citing this democratic
agenda, she said " What could we have done?" Clearly racial profiling
is not allowed by the top democrats in government that run the media.

"The structure and legal implications did not allow us to pursuer the
terrorists, " Rice said, alluding to democratic politically correct
laws and pressures of profiling any foreigners.

Rice had placed a solution to the terrorist problems, yet all these
'structure and legal implications' forced on the U.S. by the democrats
made it impossible to mount a real attack on global terrorism. " We
must act in Bold, Decisive and offence manner" if were are going to
defeat the terrorists. The democrats did not think that their stupidly
was going to be spotlighted in such a way as it was today. The
Left-wing media is doing all it can to spin and suppress the great
comments of this special great American at this moment.

To sum it all up, Rice's theme overshadowed the small Clark lies that
she repudiated with brilliance. The Bureaucracy (political correctness
and non-sharing of information by Clinton judicial precedence on
terrorists) created by the left-wing in this country is not conducive
to fighting a war - any war, against anyone. In essence, in a
atmosphere of being called a racist by the left, one cannot search
people suspected on being a terrorist. The Arabs training in flight
school could not have been stopped and searched because the fear of
the left-wing would have said that all hell has broken out and the
racist fascists have taken over. In fact, Rice said that this fear has
run -over into the intelligence community not wanting to take on tasks
as these because of this same fear of the left-wing. It is the
left-wing who are responsible and the President of the United States
really began planning a attack on other arab countries right when he
got into the White House because he was tired of letting the terrorist
attack U.S. targets all over the world periodically.

Rice also said that the Congress is part of the blame as well because
they did nothing for eight years after the first World trade Center
was targeted by international terrorist known leader Usama bin Laden.
They did not declare war, in which under any circumstance would be the
case, so they remained complacent. This clarification was made to show
why the Bush administration had began behind the doors to take an
offensive against global terrorism.

The democrats, once again, were exposed as lesser than intelligent or
loyal. All they had to do after September 11, 2001 was to say to the
republicans lets join forces and go to all out war. Instead they
called for this comic relief inquisition and received a lesson in
return. The only drawback is that this lesson dealt to the left-wing
will go unheeded, because they don't have the capacity to understand
the lesson. Condoleezza Rice tried her best to show them how they are
wrong, yet their conceded and arrogant manners has blinded them.
Blinded was another key work she used in her testimony, that showed
her in a light of being one of the great people of our generation.

By Michael Johnathan McDonald

Thursday, April 8 , 6:36 PST

Raw Data: Full Hearing Transcript The following is the full text of
Condoleezza Rice's testimony before the National Commission on
Terrorist Attacks on April 8, 2004: Can Be accessed at Fox News or My
site

http://www.MichaelReport.com

I have to agree.
.

User: "JoeS"

Title: Re: Rice Recieves an A+ by Me ;) 09 Apr 2004 01:22:00 AM
(Michael Johnathan McDonald) wrote in message news:<dd3256f0.0404081846.6091acd9@posting.google.com>...

Rice Recieves an A+

By Michael Johnathan McDonald

Thursday, April 8 , 6:36 PST

Michael Report - A great American leader stood up to another
Democratic witch hunt and high-tech lynching. Condoleezza Rice, the
National security adviser faced a lynch mob [snip]

Mike,
It's clear that you think with the same brain cell with which you
write and spell. Of course this doesn't address the substance of what
you wrote. But who has the time to determine if your diatribe has ANY
substance when the second word of your title is misspelled and the
first and second sentences lead with an implicit accusation of racism?
Or...was this intended as satire?
It's too perfect in its simple-minded sobriety. Alas, no. [insert
heavy sigh here]
--JoeS
.

User: "eric davis"

Title: Kook gives Rice an A+ 09 Apr 2004 01:17:02 AM
Are you, Tony, and the Village Idiot all sharing the same brain cell?
eric.
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dd3256f0.0404081846.6091acd9@posting.google.com...

Rice Recieves an A+

By Michael Johnathan McDonald

Thursday, April 8 , 6:36 PST

Michael Report - A great American leader stood up to another
Democratic witch hunt and high-tech lynching. Condoleezza Rice, the
National security adviser faced a lynch mob of Democrats in a comic
relief environment today.

Responding to accusations by political plants such as Richard Clark,
who gave a salacious testimony while selling his book at the Sept. 11
commission hearings, the Democrats called upon Rice to explain Clarks
accusations. The Witch hunt tried to blame George W. Bush who they
blame with full responsibility of September 11, 2001 terrorist
attacks.

The Democratic inquisition had their heads handed to them
metaphorically. It wasn't pretty. A brilliant honest American out did
the sly underhanded dealings of a commission willing to stand up for a
few September 11 victims to try to place the blame of America's worst
terrorist attack on the Bush administration. Not only were their lies
shot down, but also, a wound was manifest in them at the end of this
comic relief trial.

"Terrorists were at war with the U.S. and U.S. was not a war with
America, " Rice who drove the point home to a bunch of Democratic
witch hunters that had gathered for another high-tech lynching. The
Democrats called out Rice in order to destroy and blame the
Republicans in general, as is always the case. She destroyed them
instead and left them wounded ducks.

National security adviser Condoleezza Rice testified Thursday "there
was no silver bullet that could have prevented" the deadly terror
attacks of Sept. The Democrats called in Rice to answer question of
Richard Clarke, former terrorism aide, who had said he gave her
specific warning of an impending attack. Not only did Rice refute this
in the face of Democrats but showed that he was incompetent, a loose
cannon, a failed Clinton adviser and a person out of his mind and this
was her main point. Also, this is why she did not call upon him after
September 11, 2001.

Clark apology-blame game was irrelevant and Rice proved this morning
that he was full of lies. He wanted to be apart of the Bush
administration but Rice didn't want him because he was not qualified.
" He was not an expert of Afghanistan, he was not an expert of
Pakistan, and He was not an expert of Iraq, " Rice told the panel of
democratic witch hunters.

One of Clark statements was that on August 6, 2001 he had given a
warning of an impending terrorist attack that the Bush administration
should have acted upon. She said a classified briefing paper prepared
for the president on Aug. 6, 2001 was a "historical" document despite
its title: Bin Laden determined to attack inside the United States."
She further stated that the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center
where court records showed that Usama bin Laden called for a holy war
on America was never acted upon by Congress, or the prior
administration. She was implying this and looked at him as if to say -
what is your point?

She said it contained no "actionable" intelligence, meaning it lacked
information that would have alerted agencies to the imminent threat.
Further citing that the Democrats are a bunch of witch hunters,. "I'm
now convinced that while nothing in this strategy would have done
anything about 9-11, if we had in fact moved on the things that were
in the original memos that we got from our counterterrorism people, we
might have even gone off course," she said.

In another accusation, Clark said that Rice had never heard of
al'Qaeda terrorist organization. Then a lame democrate trying to pin
clark down read a document of one of the first national defense
meetings in which the new Bush administration discussed in January
2000 citing that 'al Qaeda was the main topic. CNN blasted right off
the bat with there coverage denying that any of Clarks accusations
were successfully refuted by Rice. The ever-so left-wing media thinks
Americans are as dumb as dirt.

A December 1999 al-Qaida plot to bomb Los Angeles International
Airport was accredited with Clinton " shacking the trees" meaning that
he was all over America stopping al-Qaida plots in another Clark
testimonial point two weeks ago.

Rice was brilliant showing how Clark was a now certified liar:"After
September 11, ***** Clarke sent us the after action report that had
been done after the Millennium Plot," Rice told the Commission. "And
their assessment was that Ressam had been caught by chance, "Rice
said. "It was because a very alert Customs agent named Diana Dean and
her colleague sensed something about Ressam," Rice explained.

Careful of not naming Bill Clinton, she used the prior administrations
game plan of judging the terrorists in courts that effectively sealed
documents so that the CIA, NSA, and DOD could not legally talk to each
other in an coordinated effort to battle terrorism.

Rice had to put up with bias statements of Richard Ben Veniste, a
holdover the prosecution of Whitewater hearings. Upon every question
to Rice, Veniste placed his own biasness opinions inside each
questions trying to get a response from Rice that would show democrats
were always the ones at the forefront on the battle of terrorism and
the Republicans were to take total blame for September 11,2001.

Veniste tried to call her a liar threatening to declassify the
document. Rice looked at him as if he was some stooped mental patient
who could not understand who he was dealing with. "Go ahead," it was
just recommendations to arm the Uzbekistans and other organizations
and was not a warning" rice said.

Veniste huffed and puffed looking as if he wanted to say - someone
stop this *****, this is not how it is supposed to go!

One of the great highlights is when the Veniste made his repeated
condescending-bias remarks about Republicans and then asking the
questions that he was sent for. This only showed that this was a comic
releaf segment and not real.

He would not let her finish her response because she was pointing out
that the prior administration was a disaster and only this
administration planned to do something about it, meaning that they did
plan attacks before September 11, 2001 on the world because they knew
that this terrorism thing had gone on for twenty-or-more years and
someone had to stand up instead of policies like Bill Clinton to shot
off a cruise missile to bomb an aspirin factory killing innocents to
try to scare the terrorists &#8211; this did not work. when
Ben-Veniste pressed her, interrupted her, deflected answers because he
could not handle the truth. Most of the time he could not handle the
response, so he almost screamed - shut up!

"I would like to finish my point," she said when he began speaking
while she was at every reply.

The Democrats were shown up as fools. Rice pointed out the Congress
did nothing all these years and showed no resolve. Everyone knew a war
was declared on America, but the Liberals pushed laws and rules so
that any administration was hamstrung to fight it. This was not what
the democrats wanted to hear and it really hurt them in the long run.
Who are they trying to fool? Americans are smart enough to decode the
bullish lies that were used in this commission.

Asked that there was work of Arabs training in flight schools why the
Republican administration did not thing she said that the Democrats
told us that if you pick-out Arabs and question them then you are
racists as we always thought you were. So, citing this democratic
agenda, she said " What could we have done?" Clearly racial profiling
is not allowed by the top democrats in government that run the media.

"The structure and legal implications did not allow us to pursuer the
terrorists, " Rice said, alluding to democratic politically correct
laws and pressures of profiling any foreigners.

Rice had placed a solution to the terrorist problems, yet all these
'structure and legal implications' forced on the U.S. by the democrats
made it impossible to mount a real attack on global terrorism. " We
must act in Bold, Decisive and offence manner" if were are going to
defeat the terrorists. The democrats did not think that their stupidly
was going to be spotlighted in such a way as it was today. The
Left-wing media is doing all it can to spin and suppress the great
comments of this special great American at this moment.

To sum it all up, Rice's theme overshadowed the small Clark lies that
she repudiated with brilliance. The Bureaucracy (political correctness
and non-sharing of information by Clinton judicial precedence on
terrorists) created by the left-wing in this country is not conducive
to fighting a war - any war, against anyone. In essence, in a
atmosphere of being called a racist by the left, one cannot search
people suspected on being a terrorist. The Arabs training in flight
school could not have been stopped and searched because the fear of
the left-wing would have said that all hell has broken out and the
racist fascists have taken over. In fact, Rice said that this fear has
run -over into the intelligence community not wanting to take on tasks
as these because of this same fear of the left-wing. It is the
left-wing who are responsible and the President of the United States
really began planning a attack on other arab countries right when he
got into the White House because he was tired of letting the terrorist
attack U.S. targets all over the world periodically.

Rice also said that the Congress is part of the blame as well because
they did nothing for eight years after the first World trade Center
was targeted by international terrorist known leader Usama bin Laden.
They did not declare war, in which under any circumstance would be the
case, so they remained complacent. This clarification was made to show
why the Bush administration had began behind the doors to take an
offensive against global terrorism.

The democrats, once again, were exposed as lesser than intelligent or
loyal. All they had to do after September 11, 2001 was to say to the
republicans lets join forces and go to all out war. Instead they
called for this comic relief inquisition and received a lesson in
return. The only drawback is that this lesson dealt to the left-wing
will go unheeded, because they don't have the capacity to understand
the lesson. Condoleezza Rice tried her best to show them how they are
wrong, yet their conceded and arrogant manners has blinded them.
Blinded was another key work she used in her testimony, that showed
her in a light of being one of the great people of our generation.

By Michael Johnathan McDonald

Thursday, April 8 , 6:36 PST

Raw Data: Full Hearing Transcript The following is the full text of
Condoleezza Rice's testimony before the National Commission on
Terrorist Attacks on April 8, 2004: Can Be accessed at Fox News or My
site

http://www.MichaelReport.com

.

User: "WH"

Title: Re: Rice Recieves an A+ by Me ;) 09 Apr 2004 06:05:29 AM
What an *****!
LOL!
WH
.
User: "TonyZ2001"

Title: Re: Rice Recieves an A+ by Me ;) 09 Apr 2004 07:35:32 AM
Liberal clowns trying to put down a good National Security Adviser.
Funny stuff.
Tony
.
User: "Condi"

Title: Re: Rice Recieves an A+ by Me ;) 09 Apr 2004 09:48:35 AM
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message =
news:20040409083532.23150.00000059@mb-m22.aol.com...

Liberal clowns trying to put down a good National Security Adviser.
=20
Funny stuff.
=20
Tony

Thanks, boys, for your loyal support. It turns me on that so many hunky =
males have come over to my side. Let me all invite you to a week-long =
cruise through the Caribbean next month, May 7-14, on my own oil tanker, =
The Condoleezza. There'll be plenty of beer and barbecued pork ribs. I =
will personally do a long, teasing strip for you all, and do my favorite =
dance, The Dance of the Seven Veils, wearing the most flimsy, sexy black =
nylon lingerie you've ever jerked off to.=20
I know you love me. I know it isn't just how I remained so cool and =
collected (and isn't that sexy, too, boys?), so prim and proper, in =
front of all those liberals...it's more than that with you, I can tell. =
Yes, Condi knows! You're not fooling me with your political caresses, =
your fawning over my intellect and powerful position in government.=20
I am a good lookin' black chick, cool on the outside, hot as a branding =
iron inside! And you'd just love to have some "fun" with me, wouldn't =
you boys?=20
C'mon, admit it, your testoterone-driven arguing and fighting here just =
shows me what you REALLY want! Well, come aboard the Good Ship =
Condoleezza, boys, and I'll show you a real good time. You deserve it. =
Yes, boys, I'm getting sooooo wet...
All my love,
Condi=20
.



User: "Never anonymous Bud"

Title: Re: Rice Recieves an A+ by Me ;) 08 Apr 2004 10:04:31 PM
While still snuggled in a 'spider hole',
(Michael
Johnathan McDonald) scribbled:

Rice Recieves an A+

By Michael Johnathan McDonald

Thursday, April 8 , 6:36 PST

Michael Report - A great American leader stood up to another
Democratic witch hunt and high-tech lynching.

You are a fucking moron, plain and simple.
Rice is as much a traitor as Ollie North,
and she WILL go down with Bush in November.
To reply by email, remove the XYZ.
Lumber Cartel (tinlc) #2063. Spam this account at your own risk.
This sig censored by the Office of Home and Land Insecurity....
.
User: "TonyZ2001"

Title: Re: Rice Recieves an A+ by Me ;) 09 Apr 2004 07:36:30 AM

Never anonymous Bud >newskat@katxyzkave.net

wrote:

Rice is as much a traitor as Ollie North,
and she WILL go down with Bush in >November.

LOL!!!
You're wacked out.
Tony
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER