If you think not, then you're not thinking
in the long term.
The Iraqi governing council wants to put
Saddam on trial in Iraq, there is no death
penalty under current Iraqi law, therefore
Saddam Hussein will be imprisioned, but
for how long?
Once coalition forces are gone from Iraq,
it will only be a matter of time before the Baathist's
reunite and take power.
Leaving him alive was a huge mistake, he now lives
to fight another day.
Tony
.
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
14 Dec 2003 03:31:02 PM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message news:20031214102847.29517.00000143@mb-m02.aol.com...
If you think not, then you're not thinking
in the long term.
LOL!
The Iraqi governing council wants to put
Saddam on trial in Iraq, there is no death
penalty under current Iraqi law, therefore
Saddam Hussein will be imprisioned, but
for how long?
As he is 66 years old at present, no doubt there will be PLENTY of
time to usurp three nations, tea and Armageddon.
Once coalition forces are gone from Iraq,
it will only be a matter of time before the Baathist's
reunite and take power.
Leaving him alive was a huge mistake, he now lives
to fight another day.
Tony
Further evidence, if any were needed, of your dismal grip on reality.
One characteristic of the delusional is that no matter the plain-sight
evidence all around them, they somehow manage to construct an
alternate actuality that supports their fantasy. This would be you.
With regard to the man in question, your only eloquent supporter said
this:
"Dream on, doofus".
-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
15 Dec 2003 07:07:39 AM |
|
|
AmyCaton@GoFree.indigo.ie
wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20031214102847.29517.00000143@mb-m02.aol.com...
If you think not, then you're not thinking
in the long term.
LOL!
There's one that isn't thinking.
The Iraqi governing council wants to put
Saddam on trial in Iraq, there is no death
penalty under current Iraqi law, therefore
Saddam Hussein will be imprisioned, >>but for how long?
As he is 66 years old at present, no >doubt there will be PLENTY of
time to usurp three nations, tea and >Armageddon.
No reason he won't live to age 80 or beyond.
Tony
"Sometimes we don't need History at all."
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "christisdore" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
15 Dec 2003 04:54:54 PM |
|
|
(TonyZ2001) wrote in message news:<20031215080739.26136.00000870@mb-m15.aol.com>...
AmyCaton@GoFree.indigo.ie
wrote:
"TonyZ2001" < > wrote in message
news:20031214102847.29517.00000143@mb-m02.aol.com...
If you think not, then you're not thinking
in the long term.
LOL!
There's one that isn't thinking.
The Iraqi governing council wants to put
Saddam on trial in Iraq, there is no death
penalty under current Iraqi law, therefore
Saddam Hussein will be imprisioned, >>but for how long?
As he is 66 years old at present, no >doubt there will be PLENTY of
time to usurp three nations, tea and >Armageddon.
No reason he won't live to age 80 or beyond.
He's a trouble maker. But he won't sit at the Temple site, having
conquered any nation.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
16 Dec 2003 04:59:42 AM |
|
|
christisdore@yahoo.com
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote in message
news:<20031215080739.26136.00000870@mb-m15.aol.com>...
AmyCaton@GoFree.indigo.ie
wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20031214102847.29517.00000143@mb-m02.aol.com...
If you think not, then you're not thinking
in the long term.
LOL!
There's one that isn't thinking.
The Iraqi governing council wants to put
Saddam on trial in Iraq, there is no death
penalty under current Iraqi law, therefore
Saddam Hussein will be imprisioned, >>but for how long?
As he is 66 years old at present, no >doubt there will be PLENTY of
time to usurp three nations, tea and >Armageddon.
No reason he won't live to age 80 or >>beyond.
He's a trouble maker. But he won't sit at >the Temple site, having conquered
any >nation.
He's not dead yet, is he?
Tony
"Sometimes we don't need History at all."
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "christisdore" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
16 Dec 2003 03:36:03 PM |
|
|
(TonyZ2001) wrote in message news:<20031216055942.26304.00000907@mb-m15.aol.com>...
christisdore@yahoo.com
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote in message
news:<20031215080739.26136.00000870@mb-m15.aol.com>...
AmyCaton@GoFree.indigo.ie
wrote:
"TonyZ2001" < > wrote in message
news:20031214102847.29517.00000143@mb-m02.aol.com...
If you think not, then you're not thinking
in the long term.
LOL!
There's one that isn't thinking.
The Iraqi governing council wants to put
Saddam on trial in Iraq, there is no death
penalty under current Iraqi law, therefore
Saddam Hussein will be imprisioned, >>but for how long?
As he is 66 years old at present, no >doubt there will be PLENTY of
time to usurp three nations, tea and >Armageddon.
No reason he won't live to age 80 or >>beyond.
He's a trouble maker. But he won't sit at >the Temple site, having conquered
any >nation.
He's not dead yet, is he?
He's being interrogated by the CIA. He's the most watched man in
captivity. If he had any magical powers, he would have used them long
ago. The world won't rescue Saddam from captivity. An AC figure must
gain world sympathy of sorts.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
17 Dec 2003 04:23:09 AM |
|
|
christisdore@yahoo.com
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote in message
news:<20031216055942.26304.00000907@mb-m15.aol.com>...
christisdore@yahoo.com
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote in message
news:<20031215080739.26136.00000870@mb-m15.aol.com>...
AmyCaton@GoFree.indigo.ie
wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20031214102847.29517.00000143@mb-m02.aol.com...
If you think not, then you're not thinking
in the long term.
LOL!
There's one that isn't thinking.
The Iraqi governing council wants to put
Saddam on trial in Iraq, there is no death
penalty under current Iraqi law, therefore
Saddam Hussein will be imprisioned, >>but for how long?
As he is 66 years old at present, no >doubt there will be PLENTY of
time to usurp three nations, tea and >Armageddon.
No reason he won't live to age 80 or >>beyond.
He's a trouble maker. But he won't sit at >the Temple site, having
conquered
any >nation.
He's not dead yet, is he?
He's being interrogated by the CIA. He's >the most watched man in
captivity. If he had any magical powers, >he would have used them long
ago.
Maybe the point of possession hasn't occured yet. Maybe, just maybe when he is
brought to trial, and given a world stage, he will speak great things and
deceive many.
The world won't rescue Saddam from >captivity. An AC figure must
gain world sympathy of sorts.
Well, the Vatican has already expressed sympathy for him, others have as well.
Tony
"Sometimes we don't need History at all."
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
17 Dec 2003 11:26:22 AM |
|
|
On 17 Dec 2003 10:23:09 GMT, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
christisdore@yahoo.com
wrote:
He's not dead yet, is he?
He's being interrogated by the CIA. He's the most watched man in
captivity. If he had any magical powers, he would have used them long
ago.
Maybe the point of possession hasn't occured yet. Maybe, just maybe when he is
brought to trial, and given a world stage, he will speak great things and
deceive many.
So you think Saddam has *Magical powers* Tony? Well they sure as hell
weren't working for him when he was in his rat hole!
LOL!
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
18 Dec 2003 07:52:08 AM |
|
|
Dani
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
christisdore@yahoo.com
wrote:
He's not dead yet, is he?
He's being interrogated by the CIA. He's the most watched man in
captivity. If he had any magical powers, he would have used them long
ago.
Maybe the point of possession hasn't occured yet. Maybe, just maybe when he
is
brought to trial, and given a world >>stage, he will speak great things and
deceive many.
So you think Saddam has *Magical >powers* Tony?
Did I say that?
Tony
"Sometimes we don't need History at all."
Dani
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
17 Dec 2003 05:42:14 PM |
|
|
In article <jm41uv4u36luac9su03ug58umgdtpqnr3v@4ax.com>, Dani <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 17 Dec 2003 10:23:09 GMT, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
christisdore@yahoo.com
wrote:
He's not dead yet, is he?
He's being interrogated by the CIA. He's the most watched man in
captivity. If he had any magical powers, he would have used them long
ago.
Maybe the point of possession hasn't occured yet. Maybe, just maybe when he is
brought to trial, and given a world stage, he will speak great things and
deceive many.
So you think Saddam has *Magical powers* Tony? Well they sure as hell
weren't working for him when he was in his rat hole!
Have you seen photos of the "rat hole"? It was actually a little apartment -
quite different from what we'd been led to believe initially. (Think they
have/had some photos of the inside on CNN - had a stove, counter, a couple of
beds, chairs - like that).
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Maryp333" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
17 Dec 2003 11:55:12 AM |
|
|
What exactly were those black scabs on Saddams face when he was captured and
examined?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
17 Dec 2003 06:14:13 PM |
|
|
(Maryp333) wrote in message news:<20031217125512.12223.00001239@mb-m05.aol.com>...
What exactly were those black scabs on Saddams face when he was captured and
examined?
================================================================================
I am guessing, but they may well have been black scabs.
Ricky
================================================================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
18 Dec 2003 06:01:30 PM |
|
|
In article <85ebfda0.0312171614.33068d58@posting.google.com>, (Werewolfy) wrote:
maryp333@aol.com (Maryp333) wrote in message
news:<20031217125512.12223.00001239@mb-m05.aol.com>...
What exactly were those black scabs on Saddams face when he was captured and
examined?
===============================================================================
=
I am guessing, but they may well have been black scabs.
I think they were dung beetles.
;-)
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "christisdore" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
17 Dec 2003 04:39:42 PM |
|
|
(Maryp333) wrote in message news:<20031217125512.12223.00001239@mb-m05.aol.com>...
What exactly were those black scabs on Saddams face when he was captured and
examined?
Don't get Tony started. He's looking for someone with a wound to the
head. Saddam seemed to have been jostled around a bit, if not punched.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
14 Dec 2003 05:39:39 PM |
|
|
In article <ad960a96.0312141331.780e7d01@posting.google.com>, (Absolute Zero) wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20031214102847.29517.00000143@mb-m02.aol.com...
If you think not, then you're not thinking
in the long term.
LOL!
The Iraqi governing council wants to put
Saddam on trial in Iraq, there is no death
penalty under current Iraqi law, therefore
Saddam Hussein will be imprisioned, but
for how long?
As he is 66 years old at present, no doubt there will be PLENTY of
time to usurp three nations, tea and Armageddon.
It just occurred to me that Bush has usurped 2 so far ....
(Not that Afghanistan could have been avoided, IMHO)
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
14 Dec 2003 10:40:58 PM |
|
|
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:%w6Db.14510$JW3.11050@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
In article <ad960a96.0312141331.780e7d01@posting.google.com>,
AmyCaton@GoFree.indigo.ie (Absolute Zero) wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20031214102847.29517.00000143@mb-m02.aol.com...
If you think not, then you're not thinking
in the long term.
LOL!
The Iraqi governing council wants to put
Saddam on trial in Iraq, there is no death
penalty under current Iraqi law, therefore
Saddam Hussein will be imprisioned, but
for how long?
As he is 66 years old at present, no doubt there will be PLENTY of
time to usurp three nations, tea and Armageddon.
It just occurred to me that Bush has usurped 2 so far ....
(Not that Afghanistan could have been avoided, IMHO)
Woods
Two down, one to go?
;)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
15 Dec 2003 04:40:14 PM |
|
|
In article <uXaDb.4833$Pg1.119@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>, "Mark" <mburggra1@earthlink.net> wrote:
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:%w6Db.14510$JW3.11050@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
In article <ad960a96.0312141331.780e7d01@posting.google.com>,
AmyCaton@GoFree.indigo.ie (Absolute Zero) wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20031214102847.29517.00000143@mb-m02.aol.com...
If you think not, then you're not thinking
in the long term.
LOL!
The Iraqi governing council wants to put
Saddam on trial in Iraq, there is no death
penalty under current Iraqi law, therefore
Saddam Hussein will be imprisioned, but
for how long?
As he is 66 years old at present, no doubt there will be PLENTY of
time to usurp three nations, tea and Armageddon.
It just occurred to me that Bush has usurped 2 so far ....
(Not that Afghanistan could have been avoided, IMHO)
Woods
Two down, one to go?
;)
Nah - just pointing out that particular portion fits Bush more than Saddam.
(Ergo - Saddam is probably not it). Nothing else fits Bush, from what I can
tell.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
15 Dec 2003 07:39:25 PM |
|
|
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:iLqDb.15763$UY6.6563@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
In article <uXaDb.4833$Pg1.119@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>, "Mark"
<mburggra1@earthlink.net> wrote:
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:%w6Db.14510$JW3.11050@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
In article <ad960a96.0312141331.780e7d01@posting.google.com>,
AmyCaton@GoFree.indigo.ie (Absolute Zero) wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20031214102847.29517.00000143@mb-m02.aol.com...
If you think not, then you're not thinking
in the long term.
LOL!
The Iraqi governing council wants to put
Saddam on trial in Iraq, there is no death
penalty under current Iraqi law, therefore
Saddam Hussein will be imprisioned, but
for how long?
As he is 66 years old at present, no doubt there will be PLENTY of
time to usurp three nations, tea and Armageddon.
It just occurred to me that Bush has usurped 2 so far ....
(Not that Afghanistan could have been avoided, IMHO)
Woods
Two down, one to go?
;)
Nah - just pointing out that particular portion fits Bush more than
Saddam.
(Ergo - Saddam is probably not it). Nothing else fits Bush, from what I
can
tell.
I agree... though one could do a lot of bending and twisting to fit that
square peg into a round hole, in the end, it would be an a waste of time and
effort.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "christisdore" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
15 Dec 2003 04:51:20 PM |
|
|
(Woodswun) wrote in message news:<%w6Db.14510$JW3.11050@twister.nyroc.rr.com>...
In article <ad960a96.0312141331.780e7d01@posting.google.com>, (Absolute Zero) wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20031214102847.29517.00000143@mb-m02.aol.com...
If you think not, then you're not thinking
in the long term.
LOL!
The Iraqi governing council wants to put
Saddam on trial in Iraq, there is no death
penalty under current Iraqi law, therefore
Saddam Hussein will be imprisioned, but
for how long?
As he is 66 years old at present, no doubt there will be PLENTY of
time to usurp three nations, tea and Armageddon.
It just occurred to me that Bush has usurped 2 so far ....
(Not that Afghanistan could have been avoided, IMHO)
Probably not his reference. An election year would be sensitive to a
new war. The first two aren't even finished yet, apparently.
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
15 Dec 2003 07:09:59 AM |
|
|
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
AmyCaton@GoFree.indigo.ie (Absolute Zero) wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20031214102847.29517.00000143@mb-m02.aol.com...
If you think not, then you're not thinking
in the long term.
LOL!
The Iraqi governing council wants to put
Saddam on trial in Iraq, there is no death
penalty under current Iraqi law, therefore
Saddam Hussein will be imprisioned, but
for how long?
As he is 66 years old at present, no doubt there will be PLENTY of
time to usurp three nations, tea and >>Armageddon.
It just occurred to me that Bush has >usurped 2 so far ....
(Not that Afghanistan could have been >avoided, IMHO)
Woods
Well Sandy, if you really think that President Bush might be the AC, then
you're living very dangerously the way you speak against him.
Tony
"Sometimes we don't need History at all."
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
15 Dec 2003 04:41:45 PM |
|
|
In article <20031215080959.26136.00000871@mb-m15.aol.com>, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
AmyCaton@GoFree.indigo.ie (Absolute Zero) wrote:
"TonyZ2001" < > wrote in message
news:20031214102847.29517.00000143@mb-m02.aol.com...
If you think not, then you're not thinking
in the long term.
LOL!
The Iraqi governing council wants to put
Saddam on trial in Iraq, there is no death
penalty under current Iraqi law, therefore
Saddam Hussein will be imprisioned, but
for how long?
As he is 66 years old at present, no doubt there will be PLENTY of
time to usurp three nations, tea and >>Armageddon.
It just occurred to me that Bush has >usurped 2 so far ....
(Not that Afghanistan could have been >avoided, IMHO)
Woods
Well Sandy, if you really think that President Bush might be the AC, then
you're living very dangerously the way you speak against him.
Wow, you're even crazier than I thought!
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
16 Dec 2003 05:01:02 AM |
|
|
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
AmyCaton@GoFree.indigo.ie (Absolute Zero) wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20031214102847.29517.00000143@mb-m02.aol.com...
If you think not, then you're not thinking
in the long term.
LOL!
The Iraqi governing council wants to put
Saddam on trial in Iraq, there is no death
penalty under current Iraqi law, therefore
Saddam Hussein will be imprisioned, but
for how long?
As he is 66 years old at present, no doubt there will be PLENTY of
time to usurp three nations, tea and >>Armageddon.
It just occurred to me that Bush has >usurped 2 so far ....
(Not that Afghanistan could have been >avoided, IMHO)
Woods
Well Sandy, if you really think that President Bush might be the AC, then
you're living very dangerously the way you speak against him.
Wow, you're even crazier than I thought!
Woods
No, I would consider someone living in the country ruled by the AC speaking out
against him to be crazy.
Tony
"Sometimes we don't need History at all."
Dani
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Chunder" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
15 Dec 2003 01:15:14 PM |
|
|
Woodswun wrote:
In article <ad960a96.0312141331.780e7d01@posting.google.com>, (Absolute Zero) wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20031214102847.29517.00000143@mb-m02.aol.com...
If you think not, then you're not thinking
in the long term.
LOL!
The Iraqi governing council wants to put
Saddam on trial in Iraq, there is no death
penalty under current Iraqi law, therefore
Saddam Hussein will be imprisioned, but
for how long?
As he is 66 years old at present, no doubt there will be PLENTY of
time to usurp three nations, tea and Armageddon.
It just occurred to me that Bush has usurped 2 so far ....
(Not that Afghanistan could have been avoided, IMHO)
Woods
Three is you count the US.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "christisdore" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
14 Dec 2003 03:48:33 PM |
|
|
He's a mass murderer who deserved to be caught. I thought it would be
more difficult, but it did take 9 months or thereabouts. The trial of
Saddam will be strange. He could say a lot, or if drugged, he would be
a show. Maybe the trial will be delayed.
.............................
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote in message news:<20031214102847.29517.00000143@mb-m02.aol.com>...
If you think not, then you're not thinking
in the long term.
The Iraqi governing council wants to put
Saddam on trial in Iraq, there is no death
penalty under current Iraqi law, therefore
Saddam Hussein will be imprisioned, but
for how long?
Once coalition forces are gone from Iraq,
it will only be a matter of time before the Baathist's
reunite and take power.
Leaving him alive was a huge mistake, he now lives
to fight another day.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
14 Dec 2003 05:43:49 PM |
|
|
In article <20031214102847.29517.00000143@mb-m02.aol.com>, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
If you think not, then you're not thinking
in the long term.
The Iraqi governing council wants to put
Saddam on trial in Iraq, there is no death
penalty under current Iraqi law, therefore
Saddam Hussein will be imprisioned, but
for how long?
Once coalition forces are gone from Iraq,
it will only be a matter of time before the Baathist's
reunite and take power.
Hole in your theory is that the Baathists have never been "united", they've been
in it for themselves and nobody else - so there can be no "reunited".
Leaving him alive was a huge mistake, he now lives
to fight another day.
It ain't over till the fat lady sings. If they'd killed him, every ding-dong
Islamic psycho would suddenly look upon Saddam as a martyr and try to avenge his
death - far better to display him as the weak, broken, and disheveled man he
was, and give him a very, very fair trial. There is no question but that he is
guilty of crimes against humanity, so the outcome is assured regardless of how
fair the trial is.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "christisdore" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
15 Dec 2003 04:58:22 PM |
|
|
(Woodswun) wrote in message news:<VA6Db.14515$JW3.2459@twister.nyroc.rr.com>...
In article <20031214102847.29517.00000143@mb-m02.aol.com>, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
If you think not, then you're not thinking
in the long term.
The Iraqi governing council wants to put
Saddam on trial in Iraq, there is no death
penalty under current Iraqi law, therefore
Saddam Hussein will be imprisioned, but
for how long?
Once coalition forces are gone from Iraq,
it will only be a matter of time before the Baathist's
reunite and take power.
Hole in your theory is that the Baathists have never been "united", they've been
in it for themselves and nobody else - so there can be no "reunited".
Leaving him alive was a huge mistake, he now lives
to fight another day.
It ain't over till the fat lady sings. If they'd killed him, every ding-dong
Islamic psycho would suddenly look upon Saddam as a martyr and try to avenge his
death - far better to display him as the weak, broken, and disheveled man he
was
The flip side to that is that the broken down old guy was probably
not coordinating attacks north and in Baghdad. He seemed to be a
hiding rat.
.................
, and give him a very, very fair trial. There is no question but
that he is
guilty of crimes against humanity, so the outcome is assured regardless of how
fair the trial is.
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
15 Dec 2003 07:14:09 AM |
|
|
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
If you think not, then you're not thinking
in the long term.
The Iraqi governing council wants to put
Saddam on trial in Iraq, there is no death
penalty under current Iraqi law, therefore
Saddam Hussein will be imprisioned, but
for how long?
Once coalition forces are gone from Iraq,
it will only be a matter of time before the Baathist's
reunite and take power.
Hole in your theory is that the Baathists >have never been "united", they've
been in it for themselves and nobody >else - so there can be no "reunited".
And where did you get this? The Baathists are very united, a very tightly knit
organization.
Leaving him alive was a huge mistake, >>he now lives to fight another day.
It ain't over till the fat lady sings.
Exactly.
Tony
"Sometimes we don't need History at all."
Dani
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "mario the great" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
14 Dec 2003 11:00:08 AM |
|
|
It's a bit OFF TOPIC, Anyway, what do you mean long term, he is 66 or so,
the trial could last for 10 years or more, how long you expect he lives 800
years?
mario
--
© Mario Gregorio 2003
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20031214102847.29517.00000143@mb-m02.aol.com...
If you think not, then you're not thinking
in the long term.
The Iraqi governing council wants to put
Saddam on trial in Iraq, there is no death
penalty under current Iraqi law, therefore
Saddam Hussein will be imprisioned, but
for how long?
Once coalition forces are gone from Iraq,
it will only be a matter of time before the Baathist's
reunite and take power.
Leaving him alive was a huge mistake, he now lives
to fight another day.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
15 Dec 2003 07:02:27 AM |
|
|
"mario the great" >mario@gregorio.fsnet.co.uk
wrote:
It's a bit OFF TOPIC, Anyway, what do >you mean long term, he is 66 or so,
the trial could last for 10 years or more, >how long you expect he lives 800
years?
The trial won't last that long, it will be over in months.
Anyway, the Ayatollah Khomeini wielded power in Iran into his 90's.
Tony
"Sometimes we don't need History at all."
Dani
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "DHM" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
14 Dec 2003 03:18:57 PM |
|
|
One dictator gone, another rises....
"mario the great" <mario@gregorio.fsnet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:bri4uo$1n9$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.uk...
It's a bit OFF TOPIC, Anyway, what do you mean long term, he is 66 or so,
the trial could last for 10 years or more, how long you expect he lives
800
years?
mario
--
© Mario Gregorio 2003
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20031214102847.29517.00000143@mb-m02.aol.com...
If you think not, then you're not thinking
in the long term.
The Iraqi governing council wants to put
Saddam on trial in Iraq, there is no death
penalty under current Iraqi law, therefore
Saddam Hussein will be imprisioned, but
for how long?
Once coalition forces are gone from Iraq,
it will only be a matter of time before the Baathist's
reunite and take power.
Leaving him alive was a huge mistake, he now lives
to fight another day.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Garvin" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
15 Dec 2003 05:48:00 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 10:28:47 -0500, TonyZ2001 wrote:
Leaving him alive was a huge mistake, he now lives to fight another day.
Tony
Absolutely. If I was the GI that found him his head would be ground chuck
today. They were seconds away from tossing a grenade in the hole they
said. Too bad...
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Rodgers" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam can still win |
14 Dec 2003 04:38:59 PM |
|
|
So he can uproot three nations, right? He has to come back to power in
order to fulfill your interpretations of prophecy. If not who is the
antichrist? Bush?
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20031214102847.29517.00000143@mb-m02.aol.com...
If you think not, then you're not thinking
in the long term.
The Iraqi governing council wants to put
Saddam on trial in Iraq, there is no death
penalty under current Iraqi law, therefore
Saddam Hussein will be imprisioned, but
for how long?
Once coalition forces are gone from Iraq,
it will only be a matter of time before the Baathist's
reunite and take power.
Leaving him alive was a huge mistake, he now lives
to fight another day.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
