The way things are going, we will have another repeat of previous war
fiascos since WWII
Saddam will be back in power and Bush will be out.....hey if the US courts
can find
OJ innocent, what do you think the Iraqui courts will do with Saddam.....
Truman had guts but passed on a face-off with N Korea, fired McCarthur, and
didnt run again
LBJ, facing certain defeat, refused to run again while VietNam's leaders
remained in power for years thereafter....
JFK was eliminated while even Fidel remains in power to this day.....
Carter was a joke and lost his reelection attempt
Clinton appeased all foreign leaders and did nothing in foreign relations
other than allow all
of them to use the White House almost as they wanted.....
Funny that the only President that was successful and who makes everyone
wistful for
the days when he was in power was IKE........
Reagan did fine tho he had a couple of skirmishes......
Surely, there has to be a Truman, an Ike or a Reagan out there somewhere in
our
country...............
How do we get choices like Gore, Bush, and Kerry???????????
.
|
|
| User: " John F Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam Will be Back |
14 May 2004 07:07:27 AM |
|
|
"EMD" <emd@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:fjYoc.2652$hH.61211@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
How do we get choices like Gore, Bush, and Kerry???????????
Because you have to get the approval of and sell out to the political and
moneyed elite, the Establishment, in America in order to run the
"governmental subsidiary".
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Leigh_Bee" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam Will be Back |
14 May 2004 06:44:50 AM |
|
|
"EMD" <emd@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:<fjYoc.2652$hH.61211@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>...
The way things are going, we will have another repeat of previous war
fiascos since WWII
Saddam will be back in power and Bush will be out.....hey if the US courts
can find
OJ innocent, what do you think the Iraqui courts will do with Saddam.....
Saddam is finished even if he was acquitted he could never rule again.
Truman had guts but passed on a face-off with N Korea, fired McCarthur, and
didnt run again
Well actually they had their butts kicked good and proper, and
realised it would take more than they had, to do the job.
LBJ, facing certain defeat, refused to run again while VietNam's leaders
remained in power for years thereafter....
Hey it was a bad deal the US promised elections, but couldn't keep a
stable government in power, and did not understand the situation.
JFK was eliminated while even Fidel remains in power to this day.....
with over 30 and maybe 50 attempts on Fidel by the CIA does that tell
you something?
Carter was a joke and lost his reelection attempt
He just had a badly trained bunch of goons saying Geronimo!
What Happened To Rotten Ronnie?
Clinton appeased all foreign leaders and did nothing in foreign relations
other than allow all of them to use the White House almost as they wanted.....
Strange it was Nixon that started those shonky deals and they have
been going ever since.
Funny that the only President that was successful and who makes everyone
wistful for
the days when he was in power was IKE........
Looked good in uniform, not much was happenning.
Reagan did fine tho he had a couple of skirmishes......
Yes Ollie North etc!
Surely, there has to be a Truman, an Ike or a Reagan out there somewhere in
our
country...............
How do we get choices like Gore, Bush, and Kerry???????????
Perhaps you have run out of aces, or is that the best that money can
buy?
LB
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam Will be Back |
14 May 2004 12:05:02 PM |
|
|
leigh8bee@optusnet.com.au
wrote:
Saddam is finished even if he was >acquitted he could never rule again.
And you base this one what exactly?
Well actually they had their butts kicked >good and proper, and realised it
would >take more than they had, to do the job.
Reading North Korean history books I see.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ex" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam Will be Back |
14 May 2004 10:01:15 PM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040514130502.22325.00000923@mb-m19.aol.com...
leigh8bee@optusnet.com.au
wrote:
Saddam is finished even if he was >acquitted he could never rule again.
And you base this one what exactly?
How are facts and a pinch of reality to start?.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.681 / Virus Database: 443 - Release Date: 5/10/04
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Leigh_Bee" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam Will be Back |
15 May 2004 06:16:09 AM |
|
|
(TonyZ2001) wrote in message news:<20040514130502.22325.00000923@mb-m19.aol.com>...
leigh8bee@optusnet.com.au
wrote:
Saddam is finished even if he was >acquitted he could never rule again.
And you base this one what exactly?
His regime in tatters, the country being taken over by the Shia's what
chance has he got?
Well actually they had their butts kicked >good and proper, and realised it
would >take more than they had, to do the job.
Reading North Korean history books I see.
Tony
No dearie consider the conflict back in 1950's, none of them have
moved since, that tell you something, perhaps McArthurs, blunder does
not get much of a run over your way, but it is documented.
Since when has N Korea had history books?
LB
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam Will be Back |
15 May 2004 08:42:53 AM |
|
|
leigh8bee@optusnet.com.au
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote in message
news:<20040514130502.22325.00000923@mb-m19.aol.com>...
leigh8bee@optusnet.com.au
wrote:
Saddam is finished even if he was >acquitted he could never rule again.
And you base this one what exactly?
His regime in tatters, the country being >taken over by the Shia's what chance
has >he got?
Baghdad, Tikrit, Fallujah, Mosul, Irbil etc. have been taken over by the Shia?
Really now, where do you get your info?
The majority of the insurgents in Iraq are former Saddam people, get a clue.
Well actually they had their butts >>kicked good and proper, and realised
it would take more than they had, to do >>the job.
Reading North Korean history books I >>see.
Tony
No dearie consider the conflict back in 1950's, none of them have
moved since, that tell you something, perhaps McArthurs, blunder does
not get much of a run over your way, but it is documented.
Since when has N Korea had history books?
LB
Mac Arthur was held back by Truman, otherwise we would have pushed the Chinese
back into China.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Leigh_Bee" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam Will be Back |
15 May 2004 04:05:13 PM |
|
|
(TonyZ2001) wrote in message news:<20040515094253.09103.00000499@mb-m17.aol.com>...
leigh8bee@optusnet.com.au
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) wrote in message
news:<20040514130502.22325.00000923@mb-m19.aol.com>...
leigh8bee@optusnet.com.au
wrote:
Saddam is finished even if he was >acquitted he could never rule again.
And you base this one what exactly?
His regime in tatters, the country being >taken over by the Shia's what chance
has >he got?
Baghdad, Tikrit, Fallujah, Mosul, Irbil etc. have been taken over by the Shia?
Really now, where do you get your info?
The majority of the insurgents in Iraq are former Saddam people, get a clue.
Is that right, if 60% of the popukation is Shia and they are drawing
the "coalition" it is the enemy of my enemy etc.
Well actually they had their butts >>kicked good and proper, and realised
it would take more than they had, to do >>the job.
Reading North Korean history books I >>see.
Tony
No dearie consider the conflict back in 1950's, none of them have
moved since, that tell you something, perhaps McArthurs, blunder does
not get much of a run over your way, but it is documented.
Since when has N Korea had history books?
LB
Mac Arthur was held back by Truman, otherwise we would have pushed the Chinese
back into China.
Tony
Truman spotted McArthur had gone rogue and was, challenging the chief,
a no no in democracy, besides Truman knew the consequences, of letting
a deluded man loose in the Asian peninsula, No sir not a man down
there look for youeself, Yes not a million troops waiting for us in
the night No, I'll tell Harry it's in the bag!
3 years to get back what they lost, Send Dougie home!
LB
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kelly" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam Will be Back |
16 May 2004 01:14:02 PM |
|
|
Truman spotted McArthur had gone rogue and was, challenging the chief,
a no no in democracy, besides Truman knew the consequences, of letting
a deluded man loose in the Asian peninsula, No sir not a man down
there look for youeself, Yes not a million troops waiting for us in
the night No, I'll tell Harry it's in the bag!
3 years to get back what they lost, Send Dougie home!
this post was an abuse of the comma
hahahaa. sorry
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ex" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam Will be Back |
14 May 2004 09:59:29 PM |
|
|
I've heard through the 'grapevine' that Saddam will hire Johnny Cochrane to
represent him.
Cochrane will likely play the 'Sadisic Tyrant' card and claim the jury is
biased ...
-ex
"EMD" <emd@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:fjYoc.2652$hH.61211@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
The way things are going, we will have another repeat of previous war
fiascos since WWII
Saddam will be back in power and Bush will be out.....hey if the US courts
can find
OJ innocent, what do you think the Iraqui courts will do with Saddam.....
Truman had guts but passed on a face-off with N Korea, fired McCarthur,
and
didnt run again
LBJ, facing certain defeat, refused to run again while VietNam's leaders
remained in power for years thereafter....
JFK was eliminated while even Fidel remains in power to this day.....
Carter was a joke and lost his reelection attempt
Clinton appeased all foreign leaders and did nothing in foreign relations
other than allow all
of them to use the White House almost as they wanted.....
Funny that the only President that was successful and who makes everyone
wistful for
the days when he was in power was IKE........
Reagan did fine tho he had a couple of skirmishes......
Surely, there has to be a Truman, an Ike or a Reagan out there somewhere
in
our
country...............
How do we get choices like Gore, Bush, and Kerry???????????
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.681 / Virus Database: 443 - Release Date: 5/10/04
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam Will be Back |
29 May 2004 05:00:31 PM |
|
|
"Ex" <ex@ex.com> wrote in message news:<tIfpc.40275$dr1.1055348@news20.bellglobal.com>...
I've heard through the 'grapevine' that Saddam will hire Johnny Cochrane to
represent him.
Chris would prefer that Cochrane's expertise be placed in the lap of a
man that he looks up too.
Cochrane will likely play the 'Sadisic Tyrant' card and claim the jury is
biased ...
....Because if Saddam gets acquitted by a Cochrane brainfart ( If the
glove don't fit you must acquit) than Switzerland may see its
largest-loudest party ever in their history hosted by Chris.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam Will be Back |
29 May 2004 05:35:34 PM |
|
|
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
.... > than Switzerland may see its
largest-loudest party ever in their history hosted by Chris.
LOL "Switzerland" what a moron you are ***** boy.
--
krib
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Grantland" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam Will be Back |
29 May 2004 05:30:18 PM |
|
|
(Michael Johnathan McDonald) wrote:
"Ex" <ex@ex.com> wrote in message news:<tIfpc.40275$dr1.1055348@news20.bellglobal.com>...
I've heard through the 'grapevine' that Saddam will hire Johnny Cochrane to
represent him.
Chris would prefer that Cochrane's expertise be placed in the lap of a
man that he looks up too.
Hey you FUCKING 'BOT!: now *that's* funny! Mwahahahahahahhahahah!!!
And you don't know why! YOU DON'T KNOW WHY!! Bwahahahahahahahha!!
AND NEVER SHALL!
tsssssss
w~
Cochrane will likely play the 'Sadisic Tyrant' card and claim the jury is
biased ...
...Because if Saddam gets acquitted by a Cochrane brainfart ( If the
glove don't fit you must acquit) than Switzerland may see its
largest-loudest party ever in their history hosted by Chris.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "dreamwalker" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam Will be Back |
14 May 2004 12:29:53 AM |
|
|
If the liberals have their way, Saddam will be back in power.
"EMD" <emd@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:fjYoc.2652$hH.61211@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
The way things are going, we will have another repeat of previous war
fiascos since WWII
Saddam will be back in power and Bush will be out.....hey if the US courts
can find
OJ innocent, what do you think the Iraqui courts will do with Saddam.....
Truman had guts but passed on a face-off with N Korea, fired McCarthur, and
didnt run again
LBJ, facing certain defeat, refused to run again while VietNam's leaders
remained in power for years thereafter....
JFK was eliminated while even Fidel remains in power to this day.....
Carter was a joke and lost his reelection attempt
Clinton appeased all foreign leaders and did nothing in foreign relations
other than allow all
of them to use the White House almost as they wanted.....
Funny that the only President that was successful and who makes everyone
wistful for
the days when he was in power was IKE........
Reagan did fine tho he had a couple of skirmishes......
Surely, there has to be a Truman, an Ike or a Reagan out there somewhere in
our
country...............
How do we get choices like Gore, Bush, and Kerry???????????
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam Will be Back |
14 May 2004 12:02:12 PM |
|
|
"dreamwalker"
wrote:
If the liberals have their way, Saddam will >be back in power.
Yep, they are working hard toward that goal.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ex" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam Will be Back |
14 May 2004 09:54:28 PM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040514130212.22325.00000922@mb-m19.aol.com...
"dreamwalker"
wrote:
If the liberals have their way, Saddam will >be back in power.
Yep, they are working hard toward that goal.
Pffffffffffftttttttttttt ... how much of a narrow-minded, idiotic,
pea-brained moron are you? Are you *so* stupid that you keep forgetting that
Iraq was fucking invaded on false or fabricated intelligence, you
God-forsaken Simpleton?
Oh! And yeah, like since it was, like, you know, fucking illegal and all I
guess, like, it would be, like only, like, fair to, like, put fucking
Saddam, like, back in power ...
Can you at *least* try to get a fucking grip on reality you complete fucking
turd-brained Neandrethal????
BTW, nothing personal ... I'm just drunk.
-ex
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.681 / Virus Database: 443 - Release Date: 5/10/04
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam Will be Back |
15 May 2004 08:04:10 AM |
|
|
"Ex"
wrote:
BTW, nothing personal ... I'm just drunk.
Killing off the few brains cells you have left, eh?
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam Will be Back |
14 May 2004 07:03:17 PM |
|
|
In article <20040514130212.22325.00000922@mb-m19.aol.com>, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
"dreamwalker"
wrote:
If the liberals have their way, Saddam will >be back in power.
Yep, they are working hard toward that goal.
Actually, looks like Rumsfeld Cheney has been working toward that goal. He
underplanned and underprepared for an unecessary war that distracted the
military from al qaeda.
In case you've forgotten, it was the Liberals who didn't want to go to war
because this was *exactly* the outcome that we couldn't afford. The liberals
knew better - and Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld are screw-ups.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ex" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam Will be Back |
14 May 2004 09:57:20 PM |
|
|
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:97dpc.34117$hY.18050@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
In article <20040514130212.22325.00000922@mb-m19.aol.com>,
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
"dreamwalker"
wrote:
If the liberals have their way, Saddam will >be back in power.
Yep, they are working hard toward that goal.
Actually, looks like Rumsfeld Cheney has been working toward that goal.
He
underplanned and underprepared for an unecessary war that distracted the
military from al qaeda.
<TYPICAL TONY REPLY>
Wrong.
</TYPICAL TONY REPLY>
In case you've forgotten, it was the Liberals who didn't want to go to war
because this was *exactly* the outcome that we couldn't afford. The
liberals
knew better - and Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld are screw-ups.
<TYPICAL TONY REPLY>
Wrong again.
</TYPICAL TONY REPLY>
Woods
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.681 / Virus Database: 443 - Release Date: 5/10/04
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam Will be Back |
14 May 2004 10:44:51 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 14 May 2004 22:57:20 -0400, "Ex" <ex@ex.com> wrote:
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:97dpc.34117$hY.18050@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
In article <20040514130212.22325.00000922@mb-m19.aol.com>,
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
"dreamwalker"
wrote:
If the liberals have their way, Saddam will >be back in power.
Yep, they are working hard toward that goal.
Actually, looks like Rumsfeld Cheney has been working toward that goal.
He
underplanned and underprepared for an unecessary war that distracted the
military from al qaeda.
<TYPICAL TONY REPLY>
Wrong.
</TYPICAL TONY REPLY>
In case you've forgotten, it was the Liberals who didn't want to go to war
because this was *exactly* the outcome that we couldn't afford. The
liberals
knew better - and Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld are screw-ups.
<TYPICAL TONY REPLY>
Wrong again.
</TYPICAL TONY REPLY>
LOL! "Wrong" ..then nothing whatsoever else to add. Just "Wrong."
(oh and then he'll usually follow it up with a "Clueless" - "Sick" -
or "Moron" .. hehe. Then if you *really* ***** him off he'll make up a
story about you, or make fun of an illness or diability you or a loved
one have! Great, isn't it?)
Dani
Woods
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.681 / Virus Database: 443 - Release Date: 5/10/04
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam Will be Back |
15 May 2004 08:00:34 AM |
|
|
Dani
wrote:
(oh and then he'll usually follow it up with a "Clueless" - "Sick" -
or "Moron" .. hehe. Then if you *really* ***** him off he'll make up a
story about you, or make fun of an illness or diability you or a loved
one have! Great, isn't it?)
Thinking of yourself there I see.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam Will be Back |
14 May 2004 11:03:49 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 15 May 2004 03:44:51 GMT, Dani <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 14 May 2004 22:57:20 -0400, "Ex" <ex@ex.com> wrote:
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:97dpc.34117$hY.18050@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
In article <20040514130212.22325.00000922@mb-m19.aol.com>,
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:
"dreamwalker"
wrote:
If the liberals have their way, Saddam will >be back in power.
Yep, they are working hard toward that goal.
Actually, looks like Rumsfeld Cheney has been working toward that goal.
He
underplanned and underprepared for an unecessary war that distracted the
military from al qaeda.
<TYPICAL TONY REPLY>
Wrong.
</TYPICAL TONY REPLY>
In case you've forgotten, it was the Liberals who didn't want to go to war
because this was *exactly* the outcome that we couldn't afford. The
liberals
knew better - and Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld are screw-ups.
<TYPICAL TONY REPLY>
Wrong again.
</TYPICAL TONY REPLY>
LOL! "Wrong" ..then nothing whatsoever else to add. Just "Wrong."
(oh and then he'll usually follow it up with a "Clueless" - "Sick" -
or "Moron" .. hehe. Then if you *really* ***** him off he'll make up a
story about you, or make fun of an illness or diability
Oops! I meant disabilty.
you or a loved
one have! Great, isn't it?)
Dani
Woods
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.681 / Virus Database: 443 - Release Date: 5/10/04
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam Will be Back |
15 May 2004 08:03:08 AM |
|
|
Dani
wrote:
Oops! I meant disabilty.
LOL!!!
Another sign of Dani's compulsive/obsessive personality, she just can't let a
type go, she is compelled to make another post just to correct one letter.
LOL!!!
Now Dani, I'm sure there are some mistakes that you have missed over the last 2
1/2 years, so run along now and check every post you've made in that time, I
know you won't be able to relax until you have done so.
Have fun.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
