<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1110892553.bdeb5bd677682dcee584ca0b53085d7e@teranews...

<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1110803895.b9595657ceb0082ceb7d6d284b7386ea@teranews...

<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1110797998.ff4e6cb1a3dfb484fa5af5ea8b459405@teranews...

itwill@happen.com wrote:

itwill@happen.com wrote:

Saddam's $2m offer to WMD inspector
By Francis Harris in Washington
(Filed: 12/03/2005)

Saddam Hussein's regime offered a $2 million (£1.4 million)

bribe

to

the United Nations' chief weapons inspector to doctor his

reports

on

the search for weapons of mass destruction.

So what pantyboy? Who gives a *****. No-one's said that Saddam

a

saint. The article would have had more 'ppmmff' if it was

the

honesty of Ekeus, who your WnutD and foxnews have tried to

discredit

in

the past, rather than a bribe attempt by Saddam.

Silly tosser!

WH

Wrong again Chris, what it proves is that Saddam had WMD and

wanted

to pay off the inspectors as insurance.

No, it doesn't.

Of course it does.

Of course it doesn't.

You're an idiot, Tommy Boy, the report said that Saddam offered the
$$$ so that the Inspectors would change their reports, if he was not
hiding things then there would be no reason to do so.

You're an idiot Tony ("Hey, no witness said that flare was at teh same
height as TWA800" LOL). That he offered someone money to provide him

some paperwork is NOT proof of ANYTHING other than he offered someone

money

to falsify paperworl.

He needed the paper work falsified because there were tons of missing
materials.

If he made all info availaible and he had nothing there would be no
reason, but he was hiding things which is why the UN Inspectors
concluded that there were tons of missing WMD and components

Once again, you can't prove a negative

If he didn't have the paperwork to prove they'd been
destroyed, he'd have a reason to try to bribe the inspectors.

Woods

Come on, if the weapons were destroyed they would know where and

when

and could have taken the inspectors to the sites.

You can't prove a negative

There would be evidence you loon.

Evidence of WHAT, kookboy? "Here's a big burnt patch of sand, this is

whee

we burned all our WMD"?! LOL

There would be residue of whatever was destroyed, but you know that,

Really? What "residue" would that be? What residue would a load of
out-of-date Sarin leave ? The dangerous bits have a shelf-life measured

5 years.

Chemical residue which can be detected, and you know it.

TW wrote:

<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1110898662.d7b424a7f08c9aa027f3b688ad3667b4@teranews...

<itwill@happen.com> wrote in message
news:1110892765.688c3addb9941ecc94e0b1c79014320c@teranews...

itwill@happen.com wrote:

itwill@happen.com wrote:

itwill@happen.com wrote:

Saddam's $2m offer to WMD inspector
By Francis Harris in Washington
(Filed: 12/03/2005)

Saddam Hussein's regime offered a $2 million (£1.4 million)

to

the United Nations' chief weapons inspector to doctor his

on

the search for weapons of mass destruction.

So what pantyboy? Who gives a *****. No-one's said that Saddam

saint. The article would have had more 'ppmmff' if it was about

the

honesty of Ekeus, who your WnutD and foxnews have tried to

discredit

in

the past, rather than a bribe attempt by Saddam.

Silly tosser!

WH

Wrong again Chris, what it proves is that Saddam had WMD and

to pay off the inspectors as insurance.

No, it doesn't.

Of course it does.

If he didn't have the paperwork to prove they'd been
destroyed, he'd have a reason to try to bribe the inspectors.

Woods

Come on, if the weapons were destroyed they would know where and

when

and could have taken the inspectors to the sites.

The person that Bush quoted as claiming there were WMDs stated

the same debriefing that they'd been destroyed after the Gulf War,

they hadn't kept records. Either that witness was believable or

So, either there were NO weapons, ever,

Well we certainly know that isn't true.

or there were and they were
destroyed before we invaded. In any case, there were no weapons to
bribe inspectors about.

Woods

Yeah ok, I know this is what you want to believe, because it your

it gives you reason to bash the President,

Ah.. like you and TWA800?

but if the weaposn had been
destroyed, there would be some type of residue left

Such as?

and Saddam could
have told the Inspectors where those sites were, but he never

where the weapons were supposedly destroyed because he was lying.

That you and your friends believe Saddam is laughable.

Tony

Here's what I reckon happened (and I posted this a couple of years

too). General X gets billions of dinars or whatever to develop nerve

He

promptly skims a load to spend on nice palaces, mercedes etc, but

up

to meeting with an impressive Powerpoint demonstrations with nice

coloured

graphs showing thousands of weapons produced per week. Saddam is

and

doesn't throw him in the paper shredder. This is all OK as long as

is

no need for anyone to match up his graphs with the actual, physical

numbers

of weapons produced.. then the WMD inspections start... and the WMD
inspectors are working from the paperwork.. oh dear.

Give me a break,

Happily. Face or arm? Mind you, given your track record you'll probably
break your leg running off to Aruba.

as if Saddam's sons and their henchmen weren't
checking up on the actual production.

As if they were! THey had rather bette rthings to do with their time,

driving flash cars and so on.

he penalty for not doing as
Saddam ordered was death, I'm sure not many in the weapons production
field wanted to die.

The widespread corrpution of Saddam's regime is well known.

I can't think of another theory that fits the facts better, can you?

Of course I can, small containers containing Bioloigcal weapons and
larger containers containing Chemical weapons and precursors were sent
across the border to safe houses in Syria,

LOL! Even though he had no facilities for making such weapons or

others are likey still
hidden within Iraq, still others may have been flown out to other
Arab/Muslim countries before the war.

Double LOL!

That you deny this possibilty shows that you mind is closed.

It' s on a level with denying the possibiility taht he loaded them all

a miaret shape UFO and has them oribtiing round the back side of the

you fucking kook!

http://www.phillysonline.com/so%20where%20is%20the%20wmd.htm
We know from post-invasion
interrogations that Saddam's own generals believed that Iraq had WMD.
If they thought so, it's hard to fault the CIA for believing it too.

Tony

TW wrote:

<

<

Saddam's $2m offer to WMD inspector
By Francis Harris in Washington
(Filed: 12/03/2005)

Saddam Hussein's regime offered a $2 million (£1.4 million) bribe

to

the United Nations' chief weapons inspector to doctor his reports

on

the search for weapons of mass destruction.

So what pantyboy? Who gives a *****. No-one's said that Saddam is a
saint. The article would have had more 'ppmmff' if it was about

the

honesty of Ekeus, who your WnutD and foxnews have tried to

discredit

in

the past, rather than a bribe attempt by Saddam.

Silly tosser!

WH

Wrong again Chris, what it proves is that Saddam had WMD and wanted
to pay off the inspectors as insurance.

No, it doesn't.

Of course it does.

If he didn't have the paperwork to prove they'd been
destroyed, he'd have a reason to try to bribe the inspectors.

Woods

Come on, if the weapons were destroyed they would know where and

when

and could have taken the inspectors to the sites.

The person that Bush quoted as claiming there were WMDs stated during
the same debriefing that they'd been destroyed after the Gulf War, but
they hadn't kept records. Either that witness was believable or not.
So, either there were NO weapons, ever,

Well we certainly know that isn't true.

or there were and they were
destroyed before we invaded. In any case, there were no weapons to
bribe inspectors about.

Woods

Yeah ok, I know this is what you want to believe, because it your eyes
it gives you reason to bash the President,

Ah.. like you and TWA800?

but if the weaposn had been
destroyed, there would be some type of residue left

Such as?

and Saddam could
have told the Inspectors where those sites were, but he never revealed
where the weapons were supposedly destroyed because he was lying.

That you and your friends believe Saddam is laughable.

Tony

Here's what I reckon happened (and I posted this a couple of years back
too). General X gets billions of dinars or whatever to develop nerve gas.

He

promptly skims a load to spend on nice palaces, mercedes etc, but turns

up

to meeting with an impressive Powerpoint demonstrations with nice

coloured

graphs showing thousands of weapons produced per week. Saddam is pleased

and

doesn't throw him in the paper shredder. This is all OK as long as there

is

no need for anyone to match up his graphs with the actual, physical

numbers

of weapons produced.. then the WMD inspections start... and the WMD
inspectors are working from the paperwork.. oh dear.

Give me a break,

Happily. Face or arm? Mind you, given your track record you'll probably
break your leg running off to Aruba.

as if Saddam's sons and their henchmen weren't
checking up on the actual production.

As if they were! THey had rather bette rthings to do with their time, like
driving flash cars and so on.

he penalty for not doing as
Saddam ordered was death, I'm sure not many in the weapons production
field wanted to die.

The widespread corrpution of Saddam's regime is well known.

I can't think of another theory that fits the facts better, can you?

Of course I can, small containers containing Bioloigcal weapons and
larger containers containing Chemical weapons and precursors were sent
across the border to safe houses in Syria,

LOL! Even though he had no facilities for making such weapons or precursors.

others are likey still
hidden within Iraq, still others may have been flown out to other
Arab/Muslim countries before the war.

Double LOL!

That you deny this possibilty shows that you mind is closed.

It' s on a level with denying the possibiility taht he loaded them all into
a miaret shape UFO and has them oribtiing round the back side of the moon,
you fucking kook!

http://www.phillysonline.com/so%20where%20is%20the%20wmd.htm
We know from post-invasion
interrogations that Saddam's own generals believed that Iraq had WMD.
If they thought so, it's hard to fault the CIA for believing it too.