| Topic: |
Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus |
| User: |
"AuthorXP" |
| Date: |
03 Jan 2004 11:52:23 PM |
| Object: |
Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an Altered Old Picture |
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/capture.htm
I have waited for the US administration nearly two weeks to see if
they got better evidence proving that they have captured Saddam
Hussein. So far I have seen nothing. It looks like that the only proof
they got is the movie they showed in that day. Well, the movie is a
fraud. The bearded guy shown in video can never be Saddam Hussein and
the still picture of the shaved Saddam is no more than an altered old
Saddam's picture. The altered picture was found and the lie is
exposed. Visit the link above and see for yourself. Copy the link and
paste it in the browser address field if it doesn't work by clicking
on it.
.
|
|
| User: "FK" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an Altered Old Picture |
05 Jan 2004 11:53:39 AM |
|
|
"AuthorXP" <AuthorXP@Yahoo.Com> wrote in message
news:b919c76.0401032152.55a886a3@posting.google.com...
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/capture.htm
simply awesome.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "AuthorXP" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an Altered Old Picture |
06 Jan 2004 04:17:38 AM |
|
|
(AuthorXP) wrote in message news:<b919c76.0401032152.55a886a3@posting.google.com>...
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/capture.htm
it is good that everybody agrees with what is written in the article.
Thank you FK for your comments. It won't take a very long time before
everybody knows the truth. Before I close this thread, I just would
like to tell everybody that Saddam will never tell the US officials
anything about the WMD and his bank accounts. And the Red Cross will
never be permitted to visit 'Saddam' in jail. I think you know why.
Because he isn't there!
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an Altered Old Picture |
06 Jan 2004 06:30:20 AM |
|
|
On 6 Jan 2004 02:17:38 -0800, (AuthorXP) wrote:
(AuthorXP) wrote in message news:<b919c76.0401032152.55a886a3@posting.google.com>...
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/capture.htm
it is good that everybody agrees with what is written in the article.
Thank you FK for your comments. It won't take a very long time before
everybody knows the truth. Before I close this thread, I just would
like to tell everybody that Saddam will never tell the US officials
anything about the WMD and his bank accounts. And the Red Cross will
never be permitted to visit 'Saddam' in jail. I think you know why.
Because he isn't there!
The proof is in the fingerprints....oh yeah that's right they didn't
print him. HHHhmmmmmmmm
.
|
|
|
| User: "AuthorXP" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an Altered Old Picture |
07 Jan 2004 08:11:30 AM |
|
|
wrote in message news:<mhalvv8to915dd5od507hns3e1msacg8m8@4ax.com>...
On 6 Jan 2004 02:17:38 -0800, (AuthorXP) wrote:
(AuthorXP) wrote in message news:<b919c76.0401032152.55a886a3@posting.google.com>...
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/capture.htm
it is good that everybody agrees with what is written in the article.
Thank you FK for your comments. It won't take a very long time before
everybody knows the truth. Before I close this thread, I just would
like to tell everybody that Saddam will never tell the US officials
anything about the WMD and his bank accounts. And the Red Cross will
never be permitted to visit 'Saddam' in jail. I think you know why.
Because he isn't there!
The proof is in the fingerprints....oh yeah that's right they didn't
print him. HHHhmmmmmmmm
They will never claim to have printed him. You know, the more proofs
they claim they have, the smaller the backdoor will become. And they
don't want it to be too small. Even the eyewitnesses aren't really
eyewitnesses. Their eyewitnesses haven't actually seen Saddam. They
have been shown a videotape only! Which is the same Santa Saddam
distorted video that has been seen by everybody. But when you hear
them saying eyewitnesses, it immediately comes to your mind that
somebody has met Saddam face to face and recognized him. Because this
is they way it is done everywhere. An eyewitness for a crime must have
seen the actual crime, not a video or a still picture!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Guelfo" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an AlteredOld Picture |
07 Jan 2004 08:25:22 AM |
|
|
AuthorXP wrote:
DaarkSyde@everywhere.com wrote in message news:<mhalvv8to915dd5od507hns3e1msacg8m8@4ax.com>...
On 6 Jan 2004 02:17:38 -0800, (AuthorXP) wrote:
(AuthorXP) wrote in message news:<b919c76.0401032152.55a886a3@posting.google.com>...
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/capture.htm
it is good that everybody agrees with what is written in the article.
Thank you FK for your comments. It won't take a very long time before
everybody knows the truth. Before I close this thread, I just would
like to tell everybody that Saddam will never tell the US officials
anything about the WMD and his bank accounts. And the Red Cross will
never be permitted to visit 'Saddam' in jail. I think you know why.
Because he isn't there!
The proof is in the fingerprints....oh yeah that's right they didn't
print him. HHHhmmmmmmmm
They will never claim to have printed him. You know, the more proofs
they claim they have, the smaller the backdoor will become. And they
don't want it to be too small. Even the eyewitnesses aren't really
eyewitnesses. Their eyewitnesses haven't actually seen Saddam. They
have been shown a videotape only! Which is the same Santa Saddam
distorted video that has been seen by everybody. But when you hear
them saying eyewitnesses, it immediately comes to your mind that
somebody has met Saddam face to face and recognized him. Because this
is they way it is done everywhere. An eyewitness for a crime must have
seen the actual crime, not a video or a still picture!
Actually your wrong. One of the members of the iraqi provisional
government has seen Saddam. He had a photo of himself together with
Saddam in his own paper. He has confirmed that Saddam is the original
one and he should know since he can tell the difference between Saddam
and a fake.
.
|
|
|
| User: "AuthorXP" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an Altered Old Picture |
07 Jan 2004 02:38:10 PM |
|
|
Guelfo <EGuelfo@netscape.net> wrote in message news:<3FFC16CC.6040508@netscape.net>...
AuthorXP wrote:
DaarkSyde@everywhere.com wrote in message news:<mhalvv8to915dd5od507hns3e1msacg8m8@4ax.com>...
On 6 Jan 2004 02:17:38 -0800, (AuthorXP) wrote:
Actually your wrong. One of the members of the iraqi provisional
government has seen Saddam.
Oh, you got a very honest eyewitness! A member of the US appointed
government. A very independent witness. So if you ask somebody who is
your witness and he replies that he himself is a witness for himself,
would you accept it?
He had a photo of himself together with
Saddam in his own paper.
You are referring to this photo
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/images/saddam_chalabi.jpg
I think a beginner in Photoshop can make better than this picture.
He has confirmed that Saddam is the original
one and he should know since he can tell the difference between Saddam
and a fake.
I don't think he has ever met Saddam in his life. So how can he tell
the difference?
Anyway, when I said eyewitnesses, I meant Saddam's secretary Abid
Hamood Al Tikriti. This is the guy they claim to be an eyewitness. And
here is the link that says he has seen a videotape only.
http://iraq.sgtstryker.com/mt/old/cat_saddam.php
From the above link:
Abid Hamood Recognizes Saddam
Press sources said that Saddam's secretary and keeper of secrets, Abid
Hamood, was woken up in detention and shown a tape of Saddam. Security
personnel wanted to see if he recognized Saddam. At first Hamood
looked disoriented, and then said something unintelligible, then he
shouted happily, and said that the miserable man was really Saddam.
--
Even though the above paragraph doesn't make sense, but the point is
that he has seen only a videotape.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Guelfo" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an AlteredOld Picture |
07 Jan 2004 06:32:16 PM |
|
|
AuthorXP wrote:
Guelfo <EGuelfo@netscape.net> wrote in message news:<3FFC16CC.6040508@netscape.net>...
AuthorXP wrote:
DaarkSyde@everywhere.com wrote in message news:<mhalvv8to915dd5od507hns3e1msacg8m8@4ax.com>...
On 6 Jan 2004 02:17:38 -0800, (AuthorXP) wrote:
Actually your wrong. One of the members of the iraqi provisional
government has seen Saddam.
Oh, you got a very honest eyewitness! A member of the US appointed
government. A very independent witness. So if you ask somebody who is
your witness and he replies that he himself is a witness for himself,
would you accept it?
I don't see the relevance of your comment to this situation. If you
believe the member of the iraqi provisional government to be dis-honest
I immagine you have some proof backing your allegations.
He had a photo of himself together with
Saddam in his own paper.
You are referring to this photo
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/images/saddam_chalabi.jpg
I think a beginner in Photoshop can make better than this picture.
Yes. That's it. It was on the front page of the Baghdad paper.
He has confirmed that Saddam is the original
one and he should know since he can tell the difference between Saddam
and a fake.
I don't think he has ever met Saddam in his life. So how can he tell
the difference?
Actually I believe he has.
Anyway, when I said eyewitnesses, I meant Saddam's secretary Abid
Hamood Al Tikriti. This is the guy they claim to be an eyewitness. And
here is the link that says he has seen a videotape only.
http://iraq.sgtstryker.com/mt/old/cat_saddam.php
From the above link:
Abid Hamood Recognizes Saddam
Press sources said that Saddam's secretary and keeper of secrets, Abid
Hamood, was woken up in detention and shown a tape of Saddam. Security
personnel wanted to see if he recognized Saddam. At first Hamood
looked disoriented, and then said something unintelligible, then he
shouted happily, and said that the miserable man was really Saddam.
ROTFL
Even though the above paragraph doesn't make sense, but the point is
that he has seen only a videotape.
Where he says that the miserable man was really Saddam.
What kind of a troll are you letting yourself down on you own.
Shame, shame, shame.
.
|
|
|
| User: "AuthorXP" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an Altered Old Picture |
08 Jan 2004 10:00:02 PM |
|
|
Guelfo <EGuelfo@netscape.net> wrote in message news:<3FFCA50A.40603@netscape.net>...
AuthorXP wrote:
Guelfo <EGuelfo@netscape.net> wrote in message news:<3FFC16CC.6040508@netscape.net>...
http://iraq.sgtstryker.com/mt/old/cat_saddam.php
From the above link:
Abid Hamood Recognizes Saddam
Press sources said that Saddam's secretary and keeper of secrets, Abid
Hamood, was woken up in detention and shown a tape of Saddam. Security
personnel wanted to see if he recognized Saddam. At first Hamood
looked disoriented, and then said something unintelligible, then he
shouted happily, and said that the miserable man was really Saddam.
ROTFL
Even though the above paragraph doesn't make sense, but the point is
that he has seen only a videotape.
Where he says that the miserable man was really Saddam.
What kind of a troll are you letting yourself down on you own.
Shame, shame, shame.
Actually the whole paragraph doesn't make sense and not just the
phrase you mentioned. This is not the way to ask an eyewitness to
confirm the identity of somebody.
He was asleep and woken up.
Looked disoriented.
Said something unintelligible.
Shouted happily...
What is this? Is he in a full control of himself?
I personally don't believe there was any independent eyewitness and
the whole paragraph is a fabricated lie. Anyway, this is not part of
the subject - the picture.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Guelfo" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an AlteredOld Picture |
09 Jan 2004 09:25:27 AM |
|
|
AuthorXP wrote:
Guelfo <EGuelfo@netscape.net> wrote in message news:<3FFCA50A.40603@netscape.net>...
AuthorXP wrote:
Guelfo <EGuelfo@netscape.net> wrote in message news:<3FFC16CC.6040508@netscape.net>...
http://iraq.sgtstryker.com/mt/old/cat_saddam.php
From the above link:
Abid Hamood Recognizes Saddam
Press sources said that Saddam's secretary and keeper of secrets, Abid
Hamood, was woken up in detention and shown a tape of Saddam. Security
personnel wanted to see if he recognized Saddam. At first Hamood
looked disoriented, and then said something unintelligible, then he
shouted happily, and said that the miserable man was really Saddam.
ROTFL
Even though the above paragraph doesn't make sense, but the point is
that he has seen only a videotape.
Where he says that the miserable man was really Saddam.
What kind of a troll are you letting yourself down on you own.
Shame, shame, shame.
Actually the whole paragraph doesn't make sense and not just the
phrase you mentioned. This is not the way to ask an eyewitness to
confirm the identity of somebody.
He was asleep and woken up.
He was in detention. Not much else to do other than sleep.
Looked disoriented.
You would be as well if they had just woken you up.
Said something unintelligible.
So what? This man was probably native from Tikrit, Saddam's home town.
His arabic was probably some dialect the interpreter couldn't understand
at first.
Shouted happily...
Probably wanted his boss captured.
Probably hated his boss.
What is this? Is he in a full control of himself?
Yeah. He is just overjoyed.
I personally don't believe there was any independent eyewitness and
the whole paragraph is a fabricated lie. Anyway, this is not part of
the subject - the picture.
But you can't you prove it.
That's the problem with you liberals, you say things that you can't prove.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Saint Isidore of Laytonville" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an Altered |
09 Jan 2004 11:29:01 AM |
|
|
I thought Saddam was living in hell in a homosexual
relationship with Satan. I personally saw this covered in the news several
times while watching South Park.
The Psychedelick Pope
Saint Isidore of Laytonville
^Ö^ Patron Saint of the Internet ^Ö^
°°^Ö^ °°
http://apple2.org.za/gswv/me
AOXOMOXOA and ENESSA QUA ONNICA
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "AuthorXP" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an Altered Old Picture |
10 Jan 2004 11:21:09 PM |
|
|
(AuthorXP) wrote in message news:<b919c76.0401032152.55a886a3@posting.google.com>...
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/capture.htm
Ok guys, this picture says it all.
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/images/saddam062.jpg
Hopefully it convinces you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Light Templar" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an Altered Old Picture |
11 Jan 2004 07:31:41 AM |
|
|
"AuthorXP" <AuthorXP@Yahoo.Com> wrote in message
news:b919c76.0401102121.65ebd5b2@posting.google.com...
AuthorXP@Yahoo.Com (AuthorXP) wrote in message
news:<b919c76.0401032152.55a886a3@posting.google.com>...
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/capture.htm
Ok guys, this picture says it all.
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/images/saddam062.jpg
Hopefully it convinces you.
Convinces us of what? Some conspiracy theorist doctored up some pictures
to push his
conspiracy theory? One could push a conspiracy theory from both
directions, and six ways
from sunday using Microsoft Photoshop, or something similar.
.
|
|
|
| User: "AuthorXP" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an Altered Old Picture |
12 Jan 2004 11:51:44 AM |
|
|
"Light Templar" <I@DONTACCEPTEMAIL.FAM> wrote in message news:<1fcMb.2489$q4.1438@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>...
"AuthorXP" <AuthorXP@Yahoo.Com> wrote in message
news:b919c76.0401102121.65ebd5b2@posting.google.com...
AuthorXP@Yahoo.Com (AuthorXP) wrote in message
news:<b919c76.0401032152.55a886a3@posting.google.com>...
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/capture.htm
Ok guys, this picture says it all.
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/images/saddam062.jpg
Hopefully it convinces you.
Convinces us of what? Some conspiracy theorist doctored up some pictures
to push his
conspiracy theory? One could push a conspiracy theory from both
directions, and six ways
from sunday using Microsoft Photoshop, or something similar.
Thank you. Somehow you agree with me. Still pictures do not mean
anything. Can be real or fake and can be altered old pictures. In any
case they prove nothing. And this is all what we have seen about
Saddam's capture. Only pictures and distorted video. If they got
better evidence they would have shown it. Why don't they show him to
journalists? Please don't tell me they care for his feelings or they
care about Geneva Convention. The images they showed in that video
violate all conventions in the world, regardless whether they are fake
or not. Please do not try to find excuses for them. They gave they
best. And their best is just that video and an altered Saddam's
picture. Now I am convinced more than anytime before that the bearded
guy is NOT Saddam Hussein. What I am now trying to do to is figure how
the bearded guy looks like without a beard. When I finish decorating
his face without a beard, I will post a notice here in the newsgroups.
It could be in this thread or a different thread. See you within one
or two days.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Light Templar" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an Altered Old Picture |
12 Jan 2004 04:56:25 PM |
|
|
"AuthorXP" <AuthorXP@Yahoo.Com> wrote in message
news:b919c76.0401120951.4ff3f87d@posting.google.com...
"Light Templar" <I@DONTACCEPTEMAIL.FAM> wrote in message
news:<1fcMb.2489$q4.1438@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>...
"AuthorXP" <AuthorXP@Yahoo.Com> wrote in message
news:b919c76.0401102121.65ebd5b2@posting.google.com...
AuthorXP@Yahoo.Com (AuthorXP) wrote in message
news:<b919c76.0401032152.55a886a3@posting.google.com>...
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/capture.htm
Ok guys, this picture says it all.
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/images/saddam062.jpg
Hopefully it convinces you.
Convinces us of what? Some conspiracy theorist doctored up some
pictures
to push his
conspiracy theory? One could push a conspiracy theory from both
directions, and six ways
from sunday using Microsoft Photoshop, or something similar.
Thank you. Somehow you agree with me.
Nope, not in the slightest. Read what I wrote again.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "ArKLyte" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an Altered Old Picture |
12 Jan 2004 12:52:31 PM |
|
|
On 12 Jan 2004 09:51:44 -0800, (AuthorXP) wrote:
I am convinced more than anytime before that the bearded
guy is NOT Saddam Hussein.
LOL!
===========================================================
"Ah yes, we must mollify angry fanatics who seek our destruction
because otherwise .. they might get mad and seek our destruction."
- Ann Coulter 9/26/2002
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an Altered Old Picture |
11 Jan 2004 01:38:18 AM |
|
|
(AuthorXP) Spat the Words
(AuthorXP) wrote in message
news:<b919c76.0401032152.55a886a3@posting.google.com>...
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/capture.htm
Ok guys, this picture says it all.
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/images/saddam062.jpg
Hopefully it convinces you.
I'm convinced. It's the same guy. He's got his eyes shut
in one picture though. I guess he's not too photogenic.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kix Adams" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an Altered Old Picture |
04 Jan 2004 08:36:29 AM |
|
|
(AuthorXP) wrote in message news:<b919c76.0401032152.55a886a3@posting.google.com>...
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/capture.htm
I have waited for the US administration nearly two weeks to see if
they got better evidence proving that they have captured Saddam
Hussein. So far I have seen nothing. It looks like that the only proof
they got is the movie they showed in that day. Well, the movie is a
fraud. The bearded guy shown in video can never be Saddam Hussein and
the still picture of the shaved Saddam is no more than an altered old
Saddam's picture. The altered picture was found and the lie is
exposed. Visit the link above and see for yourself. Copy the link and
paste it in the browser address field if it doesn't work by clicking
on it.
What a crock... Have you taken your meds today?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Saint Isidore of Laytonville" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an Altered Old Picture |
04 Jan 2004 09:21:19 AM |
|
|
WOMP WOMP!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Guelfo" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an AlteredOld Picture |
06 Jan 2004 12:24:18 PM |
|
|
AuthorXP wrote:
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/capture.htm
I have waited for the US administration nearly two weeks to see if
they got better evidence proving that they have captured Saddam
Hussein. So far I have seen nothing. It looks like that the only proof
they got is the movie they showed in that day. Well, the movie is a
fraud. The bearded guy shown in video can never be Saddam Hussein and
the still picture of the shaved Saddam is no more than an altered old
Saddam's picture. The altered picture was found and the lie is
exposed. Visit the link above and see for yourself. Copy the link and
paste it in the browser address field if it doesn't work by clicking
on it.
I imagine yours is just a joke and I shouldn't be replying but the fact
is that the two people you have shown in the picture are the exact same
person.
The fact that Saddam looks much happier and better groomed when he was
in power is to be expected.
.
|
|
|
| User: "AuthorXP" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an Altered Old Picture |
07 Jan 2004 08:09:03 AM |
|
|
Guelfo <EGuelfo@netscape.net> wrote in message news:<3FFAFD4C.5070607@netscape.net>...
AuthorXP wrote:
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/capture.htm
the two people you have shown in the picture are the exact same
person.
I don't know which pictures your are referring to. If you mean Santa
Saddam picture and Saddam's original pictures, then you must have got
a supernatural force that lets see the unseen. Santa Saddam cannot be
recognized man! But if you say Saddam's picture after shaving his
beard looks like original Saddam, I have no problem to accept that.
But you have to know that the shaved saddam is not the bearded saddam.
The shaved saddam's picture is an altered old picture. This is the
point that you have to prove it wrong. If you have read the article,
you should have seen the original altered picture.
The fact that Saddam looks much happier and better groomed when he was
in power is to be expected.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Light Templar" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an Altered Old Picture |
07 Jan 2004 09:42:03 AM |
|
|
"AuthorXP" <AuthorXP@Yahoo.Com> wrote in message
news:b919c76.0401070609.53183af0@posting.google.com...
Guelfo <EGuelfo@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:<3FFAFD4C.5070607@netscape.net>...
AuthorXP wrote:
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/capture.htm
the two people you have shown in the picture are the exact same
person.
I don't know which pictures your are referring to. If you mean Santa
Saddam picture and Saddam's original pictures, then you must have got
a supernatural force that lets see the unseen. Santa Saddam cannot be
recognized man! But if you say Saddam's picture after shaving his
beard looks like original Saddam, I have no problem to accept that.
But you have to know that the shaved saddam is not the bearded saddam.
The shaved saddam's picture is an altered old picture. This is the
point that you have to prove it wrong. If you have read the article,
you should have seen the original altered picture.
No one needs to prove you wrong on an assertion you have yet to prove is
correct.
Logic 110.
.
|
|
|
| User: "AuthorXP" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an Altered Old Picture |
07 Jan 2004 03:44:25 PM |
|
|
"Light Templar" <I@DONTACCEPTEMAIL.FAM> wrote in message news:<fNVKb.31138$IM3.18554@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>...
"AuthorXP" <AuthorXP@Yahoo.Com> wrote in message
news:b919c76.0401070609.53183af0@posting.google.com...
Guelfo <EGuelfo@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:<3FFAFD4C.5070607@netscape.net>...
AuthorXP wrote:
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/capture.htm
the two people you have shown in the picture are the exact same
person.
I don't know which pictures your are referring to. If you mean Santa
Saddam picture and Saddam's original pictures, then you must have got
a supernatural force that lets see the unseen. Santa Saddam cannot be
recognized man! But if you say Saddam's picture after shaving his
beard looks like original Saddam, I have no problem to accept that.
But you have to know that the shaved saddam is not the bearded saddam.
The shaved saddam's picture is an altered old picture. This is the
point that you have to prove it wrong. If you have read the article,
you should have seen the original altered picture.
No one needs to prove you wrong on an assertion you have yet to prove is
correct.
Logic 110.
Well, if you talk logic, then the whole article is just based on
logic. Saddam's eyes are swapped. This can be clearly seen. Saddam's
left eye is smaller than the right eye. I have searched for Saddam's
pictures in Yahoo. In over 400 pictures I have not seen a single
picture that shows the left eye bigger than the right eye. In the
'supposed' recent picture the opposite is shown. But when rotating the
recent picture we found it matching an old picture. Is there any
explanation for this other than saying that the recent picture is an
altered old picture?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Light Templar" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an Altered Old Picture |
07 Jan 2004 04:23:59 PM |
|
|
"AuthorXP" <AuthorXP@Yahoo.Com> wrote in message
news:b919c76.0401071344.56b46a0d@posting.google.com...
"Light Templar" <I@DONTACCEPTEMAIL.FAM> wrote in message
news:<fNVKb.31138$IM3.18554@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>...
"AuthorXP" <AuthorXP@Yahoo.Com> wrote in message
news:b919c76.0401070609.53183af0@posting.google.com...
Guelfo <EGuelfo@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:<3FFAFD4C.5070607@netscape.net>...
AuthorXP wrote:
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/capture.htm
the two people you have shown in the picture are the exact same
person.
I don't know which pictures your are referring to. If you mean Santa
Saddam picture and Saddam's original pictures, then you must have got
a supernatural force that lets see the unseen. Santa Saddam cannot be
recognized man! But if you say Saddam's picture after shaving his
beard looks like original Saddam, I have no problem to accept that.
But you have to know that the shaved saddam is not the bearded saddam.
The shaved saddam's picture is an altered old picture. This is the
point that you have to prove it wrong. If you have read the article,
you should have seen the original altered picture.
No one needs to prove you wrong on an assertion you have yet to prove is
correct.
Logic 110.
Well, if you talk logic, then the whole article is just based on
logic. Saddam's eyes are swapped. This can be clearly seen. Saddam's
left eye is smaller than the right eye. I have searched for Saddam's
pictures in Yahoo. In over 400 pictures I have not seen a single
picture that shows the left eye bigger than the right eye. In the
'supposed' recent picture the opposite is shown. But when rotating the
recent picture we found it matching an old picture. Is there any
explanation for this other than saying that the recent picture is an
altered old picture?
Yeah, and if you take every third word on the Beatles White Album, played
backwards,
on the third Tuesday of each month, there's a Satanic Message just for you.
And I bet you're a photographic expert then, huh?
Come back when you have something more definitive.
.
|
|
|
| User: "AuthorXP" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an Altered Old Picture |
08 Jan 2004 10:24:45 PM |
|
|
"Light Templar" <I@DONTACCEPTEMAIL.FAM> wrote in message news:<3G%Kb.15422$6B.9873@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>...
"AuthorXP" <AuthorXP@Yahoo.Com> wrote in message
news:b919c76.0401071344.56b46a0d@posting.google.com...
"Light Templar" <I@DONTACCEPTEMAIL.FAM> wrote in message
news:<fNVKb.31138$IM3.18554@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>...
"AuthorXP" <AuthorXP@Yahoo.Com> wrote in message
news:b919c76.0401070609.53183af0@posting.google.com...
Guelfo <EGuelfo@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:<3FFAFD4C.5070607@netscape.net>...
AuthorXP wrote:
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/capture.htm
No one needs to prove you wrong on an assertion you have yet to prove is
correct.
Logic 110.
Well, if you talk logic, then the whole article is just based on
logic. Saddam's eyes are swapped. This can be clearly seen. Saddam's
left eye is smaller than the right eye. I have searched for Saddam's
pictures in Yahoo. In over 400 pictures I have not seen a single
picture that shows the left eye bigger than the right eye. In the
'supposed' recent picture the opposite is shown. But when rotating the
recent picture we found it matching an old picture. Is there any
explanation for this other than saying that the recent picture is an
altered old picture?
Yeah, and if you take every third word on the Beatles White Album, played
backwards,
on the third Tuesday of each month, there's a Satanic Message just for you.
But the eye shape we are looking at is not just any third word. Eye
shape is used in verification and identification of people, birds,
animals... Unlike fingerprints, the eye shape isn't unique to
everybody. But if somebody got a very unique geometric eye shape, it
can be used to identify him. It is just like birthmarks. And in our
case, Saddam's eye shape is very unique and can be seen from a long
distance.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Light Templar" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an Altered Old Picture |
08 Jan 2004 10:30:01 PM |
|
|
"AuthorXP" <AuthorXP@Yahoo.Com> wrote in message
news:b919c76.0401082024.5ab5f7e8@posting.google.com...
"Light Templar" <I@DONTACCEPTEMAIL.FAM> wrote in message
news:<3G%Kb.15422$6B.9873@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>...
"AuthorXP" <AuthorXP@Yahoo.Com> wrote in message
news:b919c76.0401071344.56b46a0d@posting.google.com...
"Light Templar" <I@DONTACCEPTEMAIL.FAM> wrote in message
news:<fNVKb.31138$IM3.18554@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>...
"AuthorXP" <AuthorXP@Yahoo.Com> wrote in message
news:b919c76.0401070609.53183af0@posting.google.com...
Guelfo <EGuelfo@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:<3FFAFD4C.5070607@netscape.net>...
AuthorXP wrote:
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/capture.htm
No one needs to prove you wrong on an assertion you have yet to
prove is
correct.
Logic 110.
Well, if you talk logic, then the whole article is just based on
logic. Saddam's eyes are swapped. This can be clearly seen. Saddam's
left eye is smaller than the right eye. I have searched for Saddam's
pictures in Yahoo. In over 400 pictures I have not seen a single
picture that shows the left eye bigger than the right eye. In the
'supposed' recent picture the opposite is shown. But when rotating the
recent picture we found it matching an old picture. Is there any
explanation for this other than saying that the recent picture is an
altered old picture?
Yeah, and if you take every third word on the Beatles White Album,
played
backwards,
on the third Tuesday of each month, there's a Satanic Message just for
you.
But the eye shape we are looking at is not just any third word. Eye
shape is used in verification and identification of people, birds,
animals... Unlike fingerprints, the eye shape isn't unique to
everybody. But if somebody got a very unique geometric eye shape, it
can be used to identify him. It is just like birthmarks. And in our
case, Saddam's eye shape is very unique and can be seen from a long
distance.
And the shape of the eye in a picture can be effected by a bit of dust
(Saddam rubbed that eye and it the tissue around it swelled a bit), the
lighting, the angle of the picture, and any of another dozen external and
internal causes. It proves nothing. Not to mention the fact that you're
completely speculating when you say Saddam's eye shape is unique. Have you
looked into the eyes of all 6 billion people on the planet to verify this?
Probably not. Everything you're basing your opinion on is nothing but
sheer speculation.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Richard" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an Altered Old Picture |
09 Jan 2004 08:00:38 AM |
|
|
(AuthorXP) wrote in message news:<b919c76.0401071344.56b46a0d@posting.google.com>...
"Light Templar" <I@DONTACCEPTEMAIL.FAM> wrote in message news:<fNVKb.31138$IM3.18554@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>...
"AuthorXP" < > wrote in message
news:b919c76.0401070609.53183af0@posting.google.com...
Guelfo <EGuelfo@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:<3FFAFD4C.5070607@netscape.net>...
AuthorXP wrote:
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/capture.htm
the two people you have shown in the picture are the exact same
person.
I don't know which pictures your are referring to. If you mean Santa
Saddam picture and Saddam's original pictures, then you must have got
a supernatural force that lets see the unseen. Santa Saddam cannot be
recognized man! But if you say Saddam's picture after shaving his
beard looks like original Saddam, I have no problem to accept that.
But you have to know that the shaved saddam is not the bearded saddam.
The shaved saddam's picture is an altered old picture. This is the
point that you have to prove it wrong. If you have read the article,
you should have seen the original altered picture.
No one needs to prove you wrong on an assertion you have yet to prove is
correct.
Logic 110.
Well, if you talk logic, then the whole article is just based on
logic. Saddam's eyes are swapped. This can be clearly seen. Saddam's
left eye is smaller than the right eye. I have searched for Saddam's
pictures in Yahoo. In over 400 pictures I have not seen a single
picture that shows the left eye bigger than the right eye. In the
'supposed' recent picture the opposite is shown. But when rotating the
recent picture we found it matching an old picture. Is there any
explanation for this other than saying that the recent picture is an
altered old picture?
Yes, yes. And that probe didn't land on Mars either, it's a stage set
at Universal Pictures. Most conspiracy theorists lead such interesting
lives!
-Rich
.
|
|
|
| User: "Light Templar" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an Altered Old Picture |
09 Jan 2004 04:56:17 PM |
|
|
"Richard" <rander3127@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:ec75e55a.0401090600.47b5930b@posting.google.com...
AuthorXP@Yahoo.Com (AuthorXP) wrote in message
news:<b919c76.0401071344.56b46a0d@posting.google.com>...
"Light Templar" <I@DONTACCEPTEMAIL.FAM> wrote in message
news:<fNVKb.31138$IM3.18554@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>...
"AuthorXP" <AuthorXP@Yahoo.Com> wrote in message
news:b919c76.0401070609.53183af0@posting.google.com...
Guelfo <EGuelfo@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:<3FFAFD4C.5070607@netscape.net>...
AuthorXP wrote:
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/capture.htm
the two people you have shown in the picture are the exact same
person.
I don't know which pictures your are referring to. If you mean Santa
Saddam picture and Saddam's original pictures, then you must have
got
a supernatural force that lets see the unseen. Santa Saddam cannot
be
recognized man! But if you say Saddam's picture after shaving his
beard looks like original Saddam, I have no problem to accept that.
But you have to know that the shaved saddam is not the bearded
saddam.
The shaved saddam's picture is an altered old picture. This is the
point that you have to prove it wrong. If you have read the article,
you should have seen the original altered picture.
No one needs to prove you wrong on an assertion you have yet to prove
is
correct.
Logic 110.
Well, if you talk logic, then the whole article is just based on
logic. Saddam's eyes are swapped. This can be clearly seen. Saddam's
left eye is smaller than the right eye. I have searched for Saddam's
pictures in Yahoo. In over 400 pictures I have not seen a single
picture that shows the left eye bigger than the right eye. In the
'supposed' recent picture the opposite is shown. But when rotating the
recent picture we found it matching an old picture. Is there any
explanation for this other than saying that the recent picture is an
altered old picture?
Yes, yes. And that probe didn't land on Mars either, it's a stage set
at Universal Pictures. Most conspiracy theorists lead such interesting
lives!
-Rich
Conspiracy theories are, of course, people that MUST find the most
convoluted and
far reaching answer for questions and problems they don't understand. So,
one misshappen
eye becomes a matter of CIA conspiracy, eye swapping, etc... Silly stuff
indeed!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Light Templar" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an Altered Old Picture |
09 Jan 2004 04:47:01 PM |
|
|
"Richard" <rander3127@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:ec75e55a.0401090600.47b5930b@posting.google.com...
AuthorXP@Yahoo.Com (AuthorXP) wrote in message
news:<b919c76.0401071344.56b46a0d@posting.google.com>...
"Light Templar" <I@DONTACCEPTEMAIL.FAM> wrote in message
news:<fNVKb.31138$IM3.18554@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>...
"AuthorXP" <AuthorXP@Yahoo.Com> wrote in message
news:b919c76.0401070609.53183af0@posting.google.com...
Guelfo <EGuelfo@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:<3FFAFD4C.5070607@netscape.net>...
AuthorXP wrote:
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/capture.htm
the two people you have shown in the picture are the exact same
person.
I don't know which pictures your are referring to. If you mean Santa
Saddam picture and Saddam's original pictures, then you must have
got
a supernatural force that lets see the unseen. Santa Saddam cannot
be
recognized man! But if you say Saddam's picture after shaving his
beard looks like original Saddam, I have no problem to accept that.
But you have to know that the shaved saddam is not the bearded
saddam.
The shaved saddam's picture is an altered old picture. This is the
point that you have to prove it wrong. If you have read the article,
you should have seen the original altered picture.
No one needs to prove you wrong on an assertion you have yet to prove
is
correct.
Logic 110.
Well, if you talk logic, then the whole article is just based on
logic. Saddam's eyes are swapped. This can be clearly seen. Saddam's
left eye is smaller than the right eye. I have searched for Saddam's
pictures in Yahoo. In over 400 pictures I have not seen a single
picture that shows the left eye bigger than the right eye. In the
'supposed' recent picture the opposite is shown. But when rotating the
recent picture we found it matching an old picture. Is there any
explanation for this other than saying that the recent picture is an
altered old picture?
Yes, yes. And that probe didn't land on Mars either, it's a stage set
at Universal Pictures. Most conspiracy theorists lead such interesting
lives!
-Rich
Exactly.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an Altered Old Picture |
09 Jan 2004 11:22:43 AM |
|
|
AuthorXP:
Is there any
explanation for this other than saying that the recent picture is an
altered old picture?
Maybe it was the soldier who hit Saddam upside the head for spitting on him.
Saddam is a good learner. He didn't do it again.
Ryd
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Guelfo" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an AlteredOld Picture |
07 Jan 2004 08:29:05 AM |
|
|
AuthorXP wrote:
Guelfo <EGuelfo@netscape.net> wrote in message news:<3FFAFD4C.5070607@netscape.net>...
AuthorXP wrote:
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/capture.htm
the two people you have shown in the picture are the exact same
person.
I don't know which pictures your are referring to. If you mean Santa
Saddam picture and Saddam's original pictures, then you must have got
a supernatural force that lets see the unseen. Santa Saddam cannot be
recognized man! But if you say Saddam's picture after shaving his
beard looks like original Saddam, I have no problem to accept that.
But you have to know that the shaved saddam is not the bearded saddam.
The shaved saddam's picture is an altered old picture. This is the
point that you have to prove it wrong. If you have read the article,
you should have seen the original altered picture.
I did not read the article for it utter nonsence.
The Saddam they captured is the exact same person that Tony Benn
interviewd back in February before the war. For those who don't know it,
Tony Benn is a Labour MP who visited Baghdad and had an interview with
Saddam that was broadcast to ITV viewers in the UK.
The fact that Saddam looks much happier and better groomed when he was
in power is to be expected.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "free" |
|
| Title: Re: Saddam's Capture Is a Fraud - The Still Picture is an AlteredOld Picture |
04 Jan 2004 04:03:41 AM |
|
|
But the 100 billion, 400+ troopers, 4000+ wounded
cost alone to get Saddam is enough to lose Bush the
election. Who realistically can claim that was
'worth it'. Saddam was unlikely ever to have
caused nearly as much cost, lost of American
life, etc if he had been left in power to die
of old age (or until someone shot him in the back).
We all know why Bush went after him, Osama hated
the US troops deplored in Saudi Arabia to stop Saddam
as they were an offense to his religion.
Bush appeases Osama. Its sickening to think about.
AuthorXP wrote:
http://www.angelfire.com/d20/saddam/capture.htm
I have waited for the US administration nearly two weeks to see if
they got better evidence proving that they have captured Saddam
Hussein. So far I have seen nothing. It looks like that the only proof
they got is the movie they showed in that day. Well, the movie is a
fraud. The bearded guy shown in video can never be Saddam Hussein and
the still picture of the shaved Saddam is no more than an altered old
Saddam's picture. The altered picture was found and the lie is
exposed. Visit the link above and see for yourself. Copy the link and
paste it in the browser address field if it doesn't work by clicking
on it.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
