More Liberal hypocrisy exposed
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
"Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205085450.06333.00001319@mb-m18.aol.com...
Racial mixing has been extremely prevalent in Britain. According to the
1991
census, taken by the Office for National Statistics in London (ONS), 40
per
cent of young Black men in Britain are married to, or live with, a White
partner. The trend is less common on the other side of the sexual divide,
where
one in five young Black women has a partner who is White. (Ethnicity in
the
1991 Census, ONS, 1991).
Do you consider this 'racial mixing' a >>bad thing then?
Evidently he does. He has posted many >times that the white race should
remain intact (read: "pure").
No more so than any Black, Asian or Latin person would.
One might wonder how low he is on the >socio-economic scale
So now you have something against poor people? Eh, Liberal hypocrite?
Tony
.
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: Sandy looks down on the poor |
05 Dec 2004 10:00:28 AM |
|
|
TonyZ2001 wrote:
More Liberal hypocrisy exposed
Tony snips up a reply for nefarious purpose.
-A
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
"Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205085450.06333.00001319@mb-m18.aol.com...
Racial mixing has been extremely prevalent in Britain. According to the
1991
census, taken by the Office for National Statistics in London (ONS), 40
per
cent of young Black men in Britain are married to, or live with, a White
partner. The trend is less common on the other side of the sexual divide,
where
one in five young Black women has a partner who is White. (Ethnicity in
the
1991 Census, ONS, 1991).
Do you consider this 'racial mixing' a >>bad thing then?
Evidently he does. He has posted many >times that the white race should
remain intact (read: "pure").
No more so than any Black, Asian or Latin person would.
One might wonder how low he is on the >socio-economic scale
So now you have something against poor people? Eh, Liberal hypocrite?
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Sandy looks down on the poor |
05 Dec 2004 10:03:14 AM |
|
|
Absolute Zero
wrote:
TonyZ2001 wrote:
More Liberal hypocrisy exposed
Tony snips up a reply
Doesn't matter fat head, she let a piece of her mind out into that psot and
revealed how she feels about people that have less than she does.
Another Hypocrisy exposed about a Liberal. Wow, what a surprise!!!
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Sandy looks down on the poor |
06 Dec 2004 07:16:49 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205110314.11818.00001560@mb-m16.aol.com...
Absolute Zero
wrote:
TonyZ2001 wrote:
More Liberal hypocrisy exposed
Tony snips up a reply
Doesn't matter fat head, she let a piece of her mind out into that psot
and
revealed how she feels about people that have less than she does.
How does she feel about them then? There was absolutely no value judgement
in the sentence "One might wonder how low he is on the socio-economic scale"
It looks like you are merely projecting the self-loathing YOU feel for being
so low on the economic scale onto Woodswun.
Another Hypocrisy exposed about a Liberal. Wow, what a surprise!!!
Another oddly-capitalised, bizarre extrapolation from a single data-point by
Tony. Wow, what a surprise!
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Sandy looks down on the poor |
08 Dec 2004 05:56:17 AM |
|
|
"tw"
wrote:
There was absolutely no value judgement
in the sentence "One might wonder how >low he is on the socio-economic scale"
*****.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Sandy looks down on the poor |
08 Dec 2004 06:56:40 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041208065617.06431.00000991@mb-m26.aol.com...
"tw"
wrote:
There was absolutely no value judgement
in the sentence "One might wonder how >low he is on the socio-economic
scale"
*****.
Nope, it's a stone cold fact. That you can't see it merely deomnstrates your
now legendary staggering fucking idiocy. Of course, if you disagree, you
merely have to point out what value judgement she made and where.
Feel up to the task?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Sandy looks down on the poor |
08 Dec 2004 07:15:36 AM |
|
|
In article <cp6tf0$71t$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>, "tw" <> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041208065617.06431.00000991@mb-m26.aol.com...
"tw"
wrote:
There was absolutely no value judgement
in the sentence "One might wonder how >low he is on the socio-economic
scale"
*****.
Nope, it's a stone cold fact. That you can't see it merely deomnstrates your
now legendary staggering fucking idiocy. Of course, if you disagree, you
merely have to point out what value judgement she made and where.
Evidently in Tony's mind, being on the low end of the socio-economic scale
automatically makes one a lesser person. I guess, in his mindset, anyone who's
living on Social Security, Disability, or has been unemployed, is a worthless
person. And of course, we have already seen that type of mindset in posts from
years ago when he was opposed to letting people stay on welfare for as long as
they needed.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Sandy looks down on the poor |
08 Dec 2004 07:57:07 AM |
|
|
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:Y7Dtd.52196$AL5.6081@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
In article <cp6tf0$71t$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>, "tw" < >
wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041208065617.06431.00000991@mb-m26.aol.com...
"tw"
wrote:
There was absolutely no value judgement
in the sentence "One might wonder how >low he is on the socio-economic
scale"
*****.
Nope, it's a stone cold fact. That you can't see it merely deomnstrates
your
now legendary staggering fucking idiocy. Of course, if you disagree, you
merely have to point out what value judgement she made and where.
Evidently in Tony's mind, being on the low end of the socio-economic scale
automatically makes one a lesser person.
Well, exactly. HOw else can we parse his reaction to you merely *wondering*
where on the economic scale he was?
I guess, in his mindset, anyone who's
living on Social Security, Disability, or has been unemployed, is a
worthless
person. And of course, we have already seen that type of mindset in posts
from
years ago when he was opposed to letting people stay on welfare for as
long as
they needed.
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Grantland" |
|
| Title: Re: Sandy looks down on the poor |
08 Dec 2004 08:28:22 AM |
|
|
(Woodswun) wrote:
In article <cp6tf0$71t$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>, "tw" < > wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041208065617.06431.00000991@mb-m26.aol.com...
"tw"
wrote:
There was absolutely no value judgement
in the sentence "One might wonder how >low he is on the socio-economic
scale"
*****.
Nope, it's a stone cold fact. That you can't see it merely deomnstrates your
now legendary staggering fucking idiocy. Of course, if you disagree, you
merely have to point out what value judgement she made and where.
Evidently in Tony's mind, being on the low end of the socio-economic scale
automatically makes one a lesser person. I guess, in his mindset, anyone who's
living on Social Security, Disability, or has been unemployed, is a worthless
person. And of course, we have already seen that type of mindset in posts from
years ago when he was opposed to letting people stay on welfare for as long as
they needed.
Woods
And he was dead right. And you are dead wrong.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Sandy looks down on the poor |
09 Dec 2004 05:37:47 AM |
|
|
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
Evidently in Tony's mind, being on the low end of the socio-economic scale
automatically makes one a lesser >person.
That was the idea that came out of your mind, Sandy; don't try to reflect it
onto me now that you've been exposed.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Sandy looks down on the poor |
09 Dec 2004 06:14:51 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041209063747.08274.00001753@mb-m05.aol.com...
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
Evidently in Tony's mind, being on the low end of the socio-economic
scale
automatically makes one a lesser >person.
That was the idea that came out of your mind, Sandy
No, uyo raving dipshit, it came out of your reaction. Got a quote where
Sandy patronises poor people? What's that? You don't?
; don't try to reflect it
onto me now that you've been exposed.
LOL!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Sandy looks down on the poor |
06 Dec 2004 04:49:49 PM |
|
|
In article <cp1lsp$gld$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>, "tw" <no@no.com> wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041205110314.11818.00001560@mb-m16.aol.com...
Absolute Zero
wrote:
TonyZ2001 wrote:
More Liberal hypocrisy exposed
Tony snips up a reply
Doesn't matter fat head, she let a piece of her mind out into that psot
and
revealed how she feels about people that have less than she does.
How does she feel about them then? There was absolutely no value judgement
in the sentence "One might wonder how low he is on the socio-economic scale"
It looks like you are merely projecting the self-loathing YOU feel for being
so low on the economic scale onto Woodswun.
And of course, it was the self-loathing that everyone is picking up on in his
White Supremacy tendencies. Nobody with confidence, or in an upper bracket,
would feel the need to put an entire race down in order to feel worthwhile.
Another Hypocrisy exposed about a Liberal. Wow, what a surprise!!!
Another oddly-capitalised, bizarre extrapolation from a single data-point by
Tony. Wow, what a surprise!
It wasn't an extrapolation - it was a knee-jerk reaction to something he took
personally - ergo, I called it correctly.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Sandy looks down on the poor |
08 Dec 2004 05:43:32 AM |
|
|
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
And of course, it was the self-loathing >that everyone is picking up on in his
White Supremacy tendencies. Nobody with confidence, or in an upper bracket,
would feel the need to put an entire race >down in order to feel worthwhile.
Can you get any more clueless?
Here we have Sandy once again dumping on the poor by insisting that only the
poor can possibly be racist.
You sure do look down your nose at those with less $$$ than you.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Sandy looks down on the poor |
08 Dec 2004 06:57:25 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041208064332.06349.00001084@mb-m27.aol.com...
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
And of course, it was the self-loathing >that everyone is picking up on
in his
White Supremacy tendencies. Nobody with confidence, or in an upper
bracket,
would feel the need to put an entire race >down in order to feel
worthwhile.
Can you get any more clueless?
Here we have Sandy once again dumping on the poor by insisting that only
the
poor can possibly be racist.
LOL! YOu really can't read can you?
You sure do look down your nose at those with less $$$ than you.
Cite?
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Sandy looks down on the poor |
05 Dec 2004 10:22:43 AM |
|
|
In article <covb86$2jd$15@news7.svr.pol.co.uk>, Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
TonyZ2001 wrote:
More Liberal hypocrisy exposed
Tony snips up a reply for nefarious purpose.
Heh, must've touched a nerve. Note how he assumings that noting the possible
inferences something means that someone is 'against' it.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Sandy looks down on the poor |
06 Dec 2004 07:34:41 AM |
|
|
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
TonyZ2001 wrote:
More Liberal hypocrisy exposed
Tony snips up a reply for nefarious >>purpose.
Heh, must've touched a nerve.
You're inner mind was exposed when you slipped up with that condecending
comment, you are another Liberal who looks down on, and feels superior to those
less fortunate than yourself.
Liberals like you support the Welfare Stae because you feel that "those low
lifes" can't fend for themselves, and need your help and guidance to survive.
Your own words gave you away, Sandy.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: Sandy looks down on the poor |
06 Dec 2004 10:00:14 AM |
|
|
TonyZ2001 wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
TonyZ2001 wrote:
More Liberal hypocrisy exposed
Tony snips up a reply for nefarious >>purpose.
Heh, must've touched a nerve.
You're inner mind
You are inner mind?!?!
was exposed
With context snipping and woefully retarded comprehension.
Speaking of self-exposure (sans snipping of context)
==>
Still nothing to support you view, eh Amy?
Imagine, arguing a point because she feels that way, oh wait, she's a
woman, what more should we expect?
<==
And yet you're effortlessly smited by women, daily. That you're too
stupid to realise the unplumbed depths of your own ignorance, well
that's your *special* problem.
Even though many have explained that until you present an argument from
primary, respectable sources, you've made no case at all. Except perhaps
that you're a racist scum bag (redundant, 'twas widely known anyway).
So where are your political allies, Tone? Cringing with embarassment by
false association with your neo-NAZI, holocaust denying, racist sources?
For Jane: Do you now understand how the guilt by false association game
works? Are you going to call Adolph Zanowic out as you insisted the
"Liberals" did on Grantland? (as if he were one anyway). Get it now?
-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Sandy looks down on the poor |
08 Dec 2004 05:51:06 AM |
|
|
Absolute Zero
wrote:
For Jane: Do you now understand
Why do you and Dani keep crying out for Jane to join you?
Feeling a bit outgunned even at the 7, 8, or 9 too one advantage you already
have?
How many people do you feel you need to recruit to compete with me, Amy?
It seems to me that you, Dani, Sandy and your other minions will only be
satisfied when you have everyone in this group marching in lock step with you.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: Sandy looks down on the poor |
08 Dec 2004 06:15:43 AM |
|
|
TonyZ2001 wrote:
Absolute Zero
wrote:
For Jane: Do you now understand
Why do you and Dani keep crying out for Jane to join you?
Fool, I was illustrating a double standard. She's highly unlikely to
take that as an appeal for support. The opposite I would expect.
I did as she requested, I criticised Grantland's racism. I'm not holding
out for reciprocity here... just making my point that the guilt by false
association game can rebound on one.
Doubtless that shot miles over your shiny pate.
-A
Feeling a bit outgunned even at the 7, 8, or 9 too one advantage you already
have?
How many people do you feel you need to recruit to compete with me, Amy?
It seems to me that you, Dani, Sandy and your other minions will only be
satisfied when you have everyone in this group marching in lock step with you.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Sandy looks down on the poor |
08 Dec 2004 06:35:08 AM |
|
|
Absolute Zero
wrote:
I did as she requested, I criticised >Grantland's racism.
And you did it just for show because you have never done it before in all your
years here.
Obviously you did it so you could hang it over her head and then appeal for her
to do the same for you.
You're so transparent.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "victor" |
|
| Title: Re: Sandy looks down on the poor |
06 Dec 2004 06:11:23 PM |
|
|
Absolute Zero wrote:
TonyZ2001 wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
TonyZ2001 wrote:
More Liberal hypocrisy exposed
Tony snips up a reply for nefarious >>purpose.
Heh, must've touched a nerve.
You're inner mind
You are inner mind?!?!
was exposed
With context snipping and woefully retarded comprehension.
Speaking of self-exposure (sans snipping of context)
==>
Still nothing to support you view, eh Amy?
Imagine, arguing a point because she feels that way, oh wait, she's a
woman, what more should we expect?
<==
And yet you're effortlessly smited by women, daily. That you're too
stupid to realise the unplumbed depths of your own ignorance, well
that's your *special* problem.
Even though many have explained that until you present an argument
from
primary, respectable sources, you've made no case at all. Except
perhaps
that you're a racist scum bag (redundant, 'twas widely known anyway).
So where are your political allies, Tone? Cringing with embarassment
by
false association with your neo-NAZI, holocaust denying, racist
sources?
For Jane: Do you now understand how the guilt by false association
game
works? Are you going to call Adolph Zanowic out as you insisted the
"Liberals" did on Grantland? (as if he were one anyway). Get it now?
-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: Sandy looks down on the poor |
06 Dec 2004 08:43:58 PM |
|
|
victor wrote:
Nothing that I could see.
-A
Absolute Zero wrote:
TonyZ2001 wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com
wrote:
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
TonyZ2001 wrote:
More Liberal hypocrisy exposed
Tony snips up a reply for nefarious >>purpose.
Heh, must've touched a nerve.
You're inner mind
You are inner mind?!?!
was exposed
With context snipping and woefully retarded comprehension.
Speaking of self-exposure (sans snipping of context)
==>
Still nothing to support you view, eh Amy?
Imagine, arguing a point because she feels that way, oh wait, she's a
woman, what more should we expect?
<==
And yet you're effortlessly smited by women, daily. That you're too
stupid to realise the unplumbed depths of your own ignorance, well
that's your *special* problem.
Even though many have explained that until you present an argument
from
primary, respectable sources, you've made no case at all. Except
perhaps
that you're a racist scum bag (redundant, 'twas widely known anyway).
So where are your political allies, Tone? Cringing with embarassment
by
false association with your neo-NAZI, holocaust denying, racist
sources?
For Jane: Do you now understand how the guilt by false association
game
works? Are you going to call Adolph Zanowic out as you insisted the
"Liberals" did on Grantland? (as if he were one anyway). Get it now?
-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "victor" |
|
| Title: Re: Sandy looks down on the poor |
07 Dec 2004 05:43:57 PM |
|
|
Damn this new Google format. Was a good answer. I'll check the other
thread.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Sandy looks down on the poor |
07 Dec 2004 05:50:49 PM |
|
|
In article <1102463037.794747.224340@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, "victor" <christisnotdore@yahoo.com> wrote:
Damn this new Google format. Was a good answer. I'll check the other
thread.
What was a good answer? Inquiring minds want to know! :-D
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "victor" |
|
| Title: Re: Sandy looks down on the poor |
07 Dec 2004 07:40:54 PM |
|
|
A darn good answer. But since it involved the mj article and pubmed.com
and YOU, I will refrain. Sorry ladies.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: Sandy looks down on the poor |
07 Dec 2004 05:49:27 PM |
|
|
victor wrote:
Damn this new Google format.
;)
Was a good answer.
There *is* no good answer... oh go on then, surprise me.
I'll check the other
thread.
tap, tap, tap
-A
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
Saddam suddenly looks innocent
What a sleazy slimy perverted, depraved, evil, vile, putrid, deviant, hideous parasitic worthless criminal sewer rat looks like.................
That old FRICKABILITY SCALE looks like it'z gonna hit frickin' BOILING POINT soon, peoplez ! The Fat Lady iz pi$$ing herself & getting ready to hit the frickin' HIGH NOTE & the Mr Hankys (Number 2's) look just about ripe enough to give that poor old
Looks like Boeing are getting more desperate than ever...
Scary Stuff, peoplez !!!!! Looks like the Fat Lady iz clearing her throat & the poop-encrusted fan iz about ready to get splattered again with the icky brown stuff !!!!
It Looks Like The Pacific RIM Is Again "Shakin, Rattlin & Rolling"
Re: 91 looks like an ice-cold brewski
Hey, This Guy Looks Just Like Your Uncle Wally ............................................................................
| ASTRO: "Look, the sun looks just like a **GIANT SPOTLIGHT**!"
Energy bill looks bad for wyoming, and everybody
Looks Like Japan is NEXT On The List to SHAKE, Rattle and Roll.
Condoleeza O' Rice Says "***** Congress" in regards to Syria (looks like we are headed toward dictatorship)
Well peoplez, it's OFFICIAL according to the jew post -- looks like World War III iz scheduled to break out this Summer
Looks like Jane's been here!
OH well -- looks like it'z that time of the day once again to say " HOOROO " once again to all of my fave peepz __ CHEERIO, ADIOS, SAYONARA, CIAO BELLA, JOY GING, ALOHA, YASSOU, AUFWIEDERSEHEN !!!!
|
|
|
