The real 'reason for the season'....
SANTA SATAN
by Mr. Normal
(Xmas Eve, 2000)
Is it plausible that Santa is really Satan?"
Think about it, folks! It's not just that "Santa" is an obvious
anagram of Satan; that Santa wears a demonic red suit symbolic of the
fires of Hell; and that his huge hat must conceal horns. The clincher
is that Santa represents xmas, that time of year when christian greed
and phony sincerity reach their unctuous peak. It's the season when
braindead followers of the ultimate cult are whipped into frenzies that
leave them figuratively drained -- broke and exhausted.
Understandably, it's also the time of the year when depression and
suicides max out as the futility of achieving happiness sinks in at
least subliminally. A December, 2000 Gallup poll shows that 85% of us
think that xmas is too commercial, but Santa/Satan wouldn't have it any
other way! Our most respected institutions are in on the plot too.
Even the law of the land (U.S.A.) forbids a baby Jesus in the town
square, but who's there instead? You
guessed it! Santa! - Satan.
Lucifer/Satan once was one of God's angels. Satan's attempted
heavenly coup failed (Isa. 14:12-15), but he was given his very own
place to rule and called it Hell/Earth (Rev. 12:9) Satan also got free
reign to tempt as many people as he wanted (even Christ himself!) and
lots of fabulous stuff to tempt them with (like eternal youth and
Mercedes Benzes). However, Satan still was not satisfied. He worked
hard to make xmas the most important retail event of the year. A
recent survey showed that 60% of holiday spending occurs at xmas, and
another 20% at Satan's recognized holiday of Halloween. Think about
it, folks! Satan has locked up 80% of our holiday dollars! Who else
could be the "red dragon" of Revelation 12:3, ?. More important is
that asking Santa for something really is an unwitting pact with the
Devil, and parents are dooming their children's souls to Hell-Fire!
(Coming to your neighbourhood; soon - JAH.)
"Santa Satan's" devilish temptations have achieved what John Lennon
could only try to claim for the Beatles -- greater popularity than
Jesus! Indeed, "Santa Satan" truly is the reason for the season!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To read the whole article, and the whole truth about Christ-mas, please
visit http://www.truth.fi/xmas.htm
Long live the fighters for Good & Truth.
Freeman
.
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: Santa - Satan |
23 Dec 2006 07:07:39 PM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1166920877.963405.278210@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Perseid wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
I don't support the intentional killing of innocents.
Then you are a contradiction of yourself, because the US
military
under the Bush administration finds it an acceptable trade-off
to
have innocents killed if it means taking out a few questionable
characters and not putting our own soldiers at risk.
The innocents are not intentionally targeted, are they?
The innocents are intentionally allowed to die alongside
the bad guys, because the military would rather that the
innocents die than risk loss of our own soldiers in a
direct confrontation. It's bombing from 20,000 feet...
collateral damage is acceptable.
Oh, the way Clinton ordered the bombing of Belgrade?
Indeed it is... but Clinton didn't start that fight out of
thin air (the Serbs were bent on mass murdering the Kosovo
muslims, and Clinton did what he could to stop it).
Do you realize Saddam put FAR MORE people in mass graves than Milosevic
could have ever hoped to? But you don't care about that, do you?
You still really want to support Bush, don't you, even though
he essentially 'invented' a conflict in Iraq. Amazing. You're
hopeless Stephen.
You're an amazing hypocrite, Randolph.
Sorry Stephen, you can't win this one... but you can be
remembered in history as siding with the criminals, losers,
and idiots if you want to.
Well, before you pick up your marbles and declare victory, maybe you
should answer a couple of questions you ignored -- for instance, what
was Milosevic's provocation that caused Clinton to bomb Belgrade? And
do you realize that Saddam put FAR MORE people in mass graves than
Milosevic could have ever hoped to? Do you care about that? Probably
not since you failed to answer it the first time around.
Everyone knows Bush and his gang lied to get us into the Iraq
war,
"Everyone knows" just like "everyone knows" our troops left Vietnam
from the roof of the US Embassy in Saigon in 1975, you goof?
Regardless, do you also believe Richard Gephardt lied? Did Tony Blair
lie? How about Jay Rockefeller? John Edwards? John Kerry? Hillary
Clinton? Did the Clinton appointed CIA director also lie? Please
respond.
then did all the stupidest things to ensure that we can't
win. Whether you continue to support that is your decision.
There is no doubt many mistakes were made. But then mistakes are made
in every war. It's really a good thing today's leftist loonies (like
you) weren't around for the invasion of France during World War II.
They'd have no doubt been critical of military planning surrounding
D-Day, and later the Battle of the Bulge. Multiple thousands of troops
were killed during the D-Day invasion, as well as later during the
Battle of the Bulge. Today's loony left wouldn't have stood for that,
would they? Nope, they'd have said we must bring the troops home now,
and let Hitler have his way!
You ARE the Hitler!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Santa - Satan |
23 Dec 2006 09:46:07 PM |
|
|
mukyuk wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1166920877.963405.278210@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Perseid wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
I don't support the intentional killing of innocents.
Then you are a contradiction of yourself, because the US
military
under the Bush administration finds it an acceptable trade-off
to
have innocents killed if it means taking out a few questionable
characters and not putting our own soldiers at risk.
The innocents are not intentionally targeted, are they?
The innocents are intentionally allowed to die alongside
the bad guys, because the military would rather that the
innocents die than risk loss of our own soldiers in a
direct confrontation. It's bombing from 20,000 feet...
collateral damage is acceptable.
Oh, the way Clinton ordered the bombing of Belgrade?
Indeed it is... but Clinton didn't start that fight out of
thin air (the Serbs were bent on mass murdering the Kosovo
muslims, and Clinton did what he could to stop it).
Do you realize Saddam put FAR MORE people in mass graves than Milosevic
could have ever hoped to? But you don't care about that, do you?
You still really want to support Bush, don't you, even though
he essentially 'invented' a conflict in Iraq. Amazing. You're
hopeless Stephen.
You're an amazing hypocrite, Randolph.
Sorry Stephen, you can't win this one... but you can be
remembered in history as siding with the criminals, losers,
and idiots if you want to.
Well, before you pick up your marbles and declare victory, maybe you
should answer a couple of questions you ignored -- for instance, what
was Milosevic's provocation that caused Clinton to bomb Belgrade? And
do you realize that Saddam put FAR MORE people in mass graves than
Milosevic could have ever hoped to? Do you care about that? Probably
not since you failed to answer it the first time around.
Everyone knows Bush and his gang lied to get us into the Iraq
war,
"Everyone knows" just like "everyone knows" our troops left Vietnam
from the roof of the US Embassy in Saigon in 1975, you goof?
Regardless, do you also believe Richard Gephardt lied? Did Tony Blair
lie? How about Jay Rockefeller? John Edwards? John Kerry? Hillary
Clinton? Did the Clinton appointed CIA director also lie? Please
respond.
then did all the stupidest things to ensure that we can't
win. Whether you continue to support that is your decision.
There is no doubt many mistakes were made. But then mistakes are made
in every war. It's really a good thing today's leftist loonies (like
you) weren't around for the invasion of France during World War II.
They'd have no doubt been critical of military planning surrounding
D-Day, and later the Battle of the Bulge. Multiple thousands of troops
were killed during the D-Day invasion, as well as later during the
Battle of the Bulge. Today's loony left wouldn't have stood for that,
would they? Nope, they'd have said we must bring the troops home now,
and let Hitler have his way!
You ARE the Hitler!!!
How do you figure? Am I anti-Jew like some of the posters on this
group? Do I favor dictators who oppress their people, like some posters
on this group seem to? Please explain. Thank you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: Santa - Satan |
23 Dec 2006 10:33:53 PM |
|
|
You ARE the Hitler!!!
How do you figure? Am I anti-Jew like some of the posters on this
group? Do I favor dictators who oppress their people, like some posters
on this group seem to?
Please explain. Thank you.
It came to me one night! God revealed it to me in a moment of insight. I
know this to be true beyond the shadow of any doubt.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Santa - Satan |
24 Dec 2006 06:01:53 AM |
|
|
mukyuk wrote:
It came to me one night! God revealed it to me in a moment of insight. I
know this to be true beyond the shadow of any doubt.
You just 'made' my Christmas, Mondo...;)
You really do think in a similar way to me...I would have been quite
proud of that one myself!
Steven should have seen the area where you had been digging your trap.
He didn't. Thanks for the Christmas present...I'll smile at this one
for most of the day!
Grins...Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: Santa - Satan |
24 Dec 2006 10:25:56 AM |
|
|
"Werewolfy" <Werewolfy1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1166961712.964634.88850@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
mukyuk wrote:
It came to me one night! God revealed it to me in a moment of insight. I
know this to be true beyond the shadow of any doubt.
You just 'made' my Christmas, Mondo...;)
You really do think in a similar way to me...I would have been quite
proud of that one myself!
Steven should have seen the area where you had been digging your trap.
He didn't. Thanks for the Christmas present...I'll smile at this one
for most of the day!
Merry Christmas...
Grins...Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Santa - Satan |
24 Dec 2006 02:28:33 PM |
|
|
Werewolfy wrote:
mukyuk wrote:
It came to me one night! God revealed it to me in a moment of insight. I
know this to be true beyond the shadow of any doubt.
You just 'made' my Christmas, Mondo...;)
You really do think in a similar way to me...I would have been quite
proud of that one myself!
You'd be proud to be a hypocrite too?
Steven should have seen the area where you had been digging your trap.
What trap would that be?
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: Santa - Satan |
27 Dec 2006 09:48:02 PM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1166992113.617044.17690@n51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Werewolfy wrote:
mukyuk wrote:
It came to me one night! God revealed it to me in a moment of insight.
I
know this to be true beyond the shadow of any doubt.
You just 'made' my Christmas, Mondo...;)
You really do think in a similar way to me...I would have been quite
proud of that one myself!
You'd be proud to be a hypocrite too?
Steven should have seen the area where you had been digging your trap.
What trap would that be?
It doesn't matter, since there's no way of getting out!!!!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Santa - Satan |
23 Dec 2006 10:48:35 PM |
|
|
mukyuk wrote:
You ARE the Hitler!!!
How do you figure? Am I anti-Jew like some of the posters on this
group? Do I favor dictators who oppress their people, like some posters
on this group seem to?
Please explain. Thank you.
It came to me one night! God revealed it to me in a moment of insight. I
know this to be true beyond the shadow of any doubt.
You invoking God is a new height of hypocrisy. I'm afraid you've even
outdone Randolph this time.
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: Santa - Satan |
23 Dec 2006 10:53:49 PM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1166935715.269243.266810@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
mukyuk wrote:
You ARE the Hitler!!!
How do you figure? Am I anti-Jew like some of the posters on this
group? Do I favor dictators who oppress their people, like some posters
on this group seem to?
Please explain. Thank you.
It came to me one night! God revealed it to me in a moment of insight. I
know this to be true beyond the shadow of any doubt.
You invoking God is a new height of hypocrisy. I'm afraid you've even
outdone Randolph this time.
Isn't that what you do in a way?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: Santa - Satan |
24 Dec 2006 12:32:36 AM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "mukyuk" <a@b.com> Spat the Words
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1166935715.269243.266810@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
mukyuk wrote:
You ARE the Hitler!!!
How do you figure? Am I anti-Jew like some of the posters on this
group? Do I favor dictators who oppress their people, like some posters
on this group seem to?
Please explain. Thank you.
It came to me one night! God revealed it to me in a moment of insight. I
know this to be true beyond the shadow of any doubt.
You invoking God is a new height of hypocrisy. I'm afraid you've even
outdone Randolph this time.
Isn't that what you do in a way?
Yes, Stephen claims to love his fellow human but supports
an illegal war which has claimed a half million Iraqi lives
(and he wants to lecture us about hypocrisy).
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Santa - Satan |
24 Dec 2006 12:46:02 AM |
|
|
Perseid wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "mukyuk" <a@b.com> Spat the Words
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1166935715.269243.266810@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
mukyuk wrote:
You ARE the Hitler!!!
How do you figure? Am I anti-Jew like some of the posters on this
group? Do I favor dictators who oppress their people, like some posters
on this group seem to?
Please explain. Thank you.
It came to me one night! God revealed it to me in a moment of insight. I
know this to be true beyond the shadow of any doubt.
You invoking God is a new height of hypocrisy. I'm afraid you've even
outdone Randolph this time.
Isn't that what you do in a way?
Yes, Stephen claims to love his fellow human but supports
an illegal war which has claimed a half million Iraqi lives
(and he wants to lecture us about hypocrisy).
Did you support President Clinton's bombing of Belgrade?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Santa - Satan |
23 Dec 2006 11:02:09 PM |
|
|
mukyuk wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1166935715.269243.266810@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
mukyuk wrote:
You ARE the Hitler!!!
How do you figure? Am I anti-Jew like some of the posters on this
group? Do I favor dictators who oppress their people, like some posters
on this group seem to?
Please explain. Thank you.
It came to me one night! God revealed it to me in a moment of insight. I
know this to be true beyond the shadow of any doubt.
You invoking God is a new height of hypocrisy. I'm afraid you've even
outdone Randolph this time.
Isn't that what you do in a way?
The definition of a hypocrite is someone who expresses beliefs he does
not hold. I actually believe in God. Do you?
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: Santa - Satan |
24 Dec 2006 10:55:46 AM |
|
|
The definition of a hypocrite is someone who expresses beliefs he does
not hold. I actually believe in God. Do you?
I use hypocrisy when dealing with hypocrites Steven.
As for God, yes I do believe God to exist as a figment of *your
imagination*! I incidentally know the difference between beliefs, logical
reasoning, provable fact, and observable reality.
Besides 'God is Love', some say. Yet, I can't remember the last time you
expressed love or compassion here. When I think of you Steven, love is a
far distant emotion. What about you? Do you love me, as a good Christian
must?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Santa - Satan |
24 Dec 2006 02:32:52 PM |
|
|
mukyuk wrote:
The definition of a hypocrite is someone who expresses beliefs he does
not hold. I actually believe in God. Do you?
I use hypocrisy when dealing with hypocrites Steven.
What belief have I expressed that I do not hold?
As for God, yes I do believe God to exist as a figment of *your
imagination*!
That's your opinion. What does that have to do with your hypocrisy?
I incidentally know the difference between beliefs, logical
reasoning, provable fact, and observable reality.
So do I. That's why I know I can't explain why I feel the way I do
about the existence of God. But just because you don't understand it
doesn't make it any less real.
Besides 'God is Love', some say. Yet, I can't remember the last time you
expressed love or compassion here. When I think of you Steven, love is a
far distant emotion. What about you? Do you love me, as a good Christian
must?
Well let's see -- of the two of us, which has wished the other dead? I
would never wish you dead, little buddy. I wish you a long, happy,
healthy life. Let's see, just the other day I told Doc I was sorry to
hear of his health problems, and I wish him well. And I sincerely do. I
want no harm to come to anyone. I have noticed other posters here who
do not always wish good health to others. So I don't know what more I
can do for you, little buddy. I really, truly, and sincerely wish you
all the best life has to offer. What more can I say?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Docrodile" |
|
| Title: Re: Santa - Satan |
29 Dec 2006 03:32:43 AM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1166992372.936891.148110@79g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
mukyuk wrote:
The definition of a hypocrite is someone who expresses beliefs he
does
not hold. I actually believe in God. Do you?
I use hypocrisy when dealing with hypocrites Steven.
What belief have I expressed that I do not hold?
As for God, yes I do believe God to exist as a figment of *your
imagination*!
That's your opinion. What does that have to do with your hypocrisy?
I incidentally know the difference between beliefs, logical
reasoning, provable fact, and observable reality.
So do I. That's why I know I can't explain why I feel the way I do
about the existence of God. But just because you don't understand it
doesn't make it any less real.
Besides 'God is Love', some say. Yet, I can't remember the last time
you
expressed love or compassion here. When I think of you Steven, love is
a
far distant emotion. What about you? Do you love me, as a good
Christian
must?
Well let's see -- of the two of us, which has wished the other dead? I
would never wish you dead, little buddy. I wish you a long, happy,
healthy life. Let's see, just the other day I told Doc I was sorry to
hear of his health problems, and I wish him well.
I think I'm gonna be sick...oooooh....jeeeez...
And I sincerely do. I
want no harm to come to anyone. I have noticed other posters here who
do not always wish good health to others. So I don't know what more I
can do for you, little buddy. I really, truly, and sincerely wish you
all the best life has to offer. What more can I say?
I'm gonna chuck my cookies....aaaargh....ugh....
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: Santa - Satan |
29 Dec 2006 11:29:10 AM |
|
|
"Docrodile" <swampything@hellsbayou4u.com> wrote in message
news:en2nbu$b61$1@aioe.org...
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1166992372.936891.148110@79g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
mukyuk wrote:
The definition of a hypocrite is someone who expresses beliefs he does
not hold. I actually believe in God. Do you?
I use hypocrisy when dealing with hypocrites Steven.
What belief have I expressed that I do not hold?
As for God, yes I do believe God to exist as a figment of *your
imagination*!
That's your opinion. What does that have to do with your hypocrisy?
I incidentally know the difference between beliefs, logical
reasoning, provable fact, and observable reality.
So do I. That's why I know I can't explain why I feel the way I do
about the existence of God. But just because you don't understand it
doesn't make it any less real.
Besides 'God is Love', some say. Yet, I can't remember the last time you
expressed love or compassion here. When I think of you Steven, love is
a
far distant emotion. What about you? Do you love me, as a good
Christian
must?
Well let's see -- of the two of us, which has wished the other dead? I
would never wish you dead, little buddy. I wish you a long, happy,
healthy life. Let's see, just the other day I told Doc I was sorry to
hear of his health problems, and I wish him well.
I think I'm gonna be sick...oooooh....jeeeez...
And I sincerely do. I
want no harm to come to anyone. I have noticed other posters here who
do not always wish good health to others. So I don't know what more I
can do for you, little buddy. I really, truly, and sincerely wish you
all the best life has to offer. What more can I say?
I'm gonna chuck my cookies....aaaargh....ugh....
Thank me and my skillful technique that coaxed a little compassion out of
Steven! But, I would take anything Steven says with a 'grain of salt'. He
lies through his teeth, just like the rest of his 'kind'
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Santa - Satan |
29 Dec 2006 02:42:09 PM |
|
|
mukyuk wrote:
"Docrodile" <swampything@hellsbayou4u.com> wrote in message
news:en2nbu$b61$1@aioe.org...
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1166992372.936891.148110@79g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
mukyuk wrote:
The definition of a hypocrite is someone who expresses beliefs he does
not hold. I actually believe in God. Do you?
I use hypocrisy when dealing with hypocrites Steven.
What belief have I expressed that I do not hold?
As for God, yes I do believe God to exist as a figment of *your
imagination*!
That's your opinion. What does that have to do with your hypocrisy?
I incidentally know the difference between beliefs, logical
reasoning, provable fact, and observable reality.
So do I. That's why I know I can't explain why I feel the way I do
about the existence of God. But just because you don't understand it
doesn't make it any less real.
Besides 'God is Love', some say. Yet, I can't remember the last time you
expressed love or compassion here. When I think of you Steven, love is
a
far distant emotion. What about you? Do you love me, as a good
Christian
must?
Well let's see -- of the two of us, which has wished the other dead? I
would never wish you dead, little buddy. I wish you a long, happy,
healthy life. Let's see, just the other day I told Doc I was sorry to
hear of his health problems, and I wish him well.
I think I'm gonna be sick...oooooh....jeeeez...
And I sincerely do. I
want no harm to come to anyone. I have noticed other posters here who
do not always wish good health to others. So I don't know what more I
can do for you, little buddy. I really, truly, and sincerely wish you
all the best life has to offer. What more can I say?
I'm gonna chuck my cookies....aaaargh....ugh....
Thank me and my skillful technique that coaxed a little compassion out of
Steven! But, I would take anything Steven says with a 'grain of salt'. He
lies through his teeth, just like the rest of his 'kind'
I suppose you don't remember that time you said something about having
a relapse, and we had a friendly interaction for a couple of days
before you turned back into the snake that you are. Really, which of
the two of us wishes the other dead? And you talk about compassion?
Your usual hypocrisy in full form.
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: Santa - Satan |
29 Dec 2006 03:24:49 PM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1167424929.359856.115260@i12g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
mukyuk wrote:
"Docrodile" <swampything@hellsbayou4u.com> wrote in message
news:en2nbu$b61$1@aioe.org...
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1166992372.936891.148110@79g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
mukyuk wrote:
The definition of a hypocrite is someone who expresses beliefs he
does
not hold. I actually believe in God. Do you?
I use hypocrisy when dealing with hypocrites Steven.
What belief have I expressed that I do not hold?
As for God, yes I do believe God to exist as a figment of *your
imagination*!
That's your opinion. What does that have to do with your hypocrisy?
I incidentally know the difference between beliefs, logical
reasoning, provable fact, and observable reality.
So do I. That's why I know I can't explain why I feel the way I do
about the existence of God. But just because you don't understand it
doesn't make it any less real.
Besides 'God is Love', some say. Yet, I can't remember the last time
you
expressed love or compassion here. When I think of you Steven, love
is
a
far distant emotion. What about you? Do you love me, as a good
Christian
must?
Well let's see -- of the two of us, which has wished the other dead? I
would never wish you dead, little buddy. I wish you a long, happy,
healthy life. Let's see, just the other day I told Doc I was sorry to
hear of his health problems, and I wish him well.
I think I'm gonna be sick...oooooh....jeeeez...
And I sincerely do. I
want no harm to come to anyone. I have noticed other posters here who
do not always wish good health to others. So I don't know what more I
can do for you, little buddy. I really, truly, and sincerely wish you
all the best life has to offer. What more can I say?
I'm gonna chuck my cookies....aaaargh....ugh....
Thank me and my skillful technique that coaxed a little compassion out of
Steven! But, I would take anything Steven says with a 'grain of salt'.
He
lies through his teeth, just like the rest of his 'kind'
I suppose you don't remember that time you said something about having
a relapse, and we had a friendly interaction for a couple of days
before you turned back into the snake that you are. Really, which of
the two of us wishes the other dead? And you talk about compassion?
Your usual hypocrisy in full form.
I express compassion where it belongs and do not pretend otherwise! You
say one thing, but your sarcism shows that you feel something totally
different. I wonder what would happen were you able to say what you actually
think. Perhaps telling the truth might make you blow up in a puff of smoke!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: Santa - Satan |
27 Dec 2006 09:46:02 PM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1166992372.936891.148110@79g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
mukyuk wrote:
The definition of a hypocrite is someone who expresses beliefs he does
not hold. I actually believe in God. Do you?
I use hypocrisy when dealing with hypocrites Steven.
What belief have I expressed that I do not hold?
As for God, yes I do believe God to exist as a figment of *your
imagination*!
That's your opinion. What does that have to do with your hypocrisy?
I incidentally know the difference between beliefs, logical
reasoning, provable fact, and observable reality.
So do I. That's why I know I can't explain why I feel the way I do
about the existence of God. But just because you don't understand it
doesn't make it any less real.
Besides 'God is Love', some say. Yet, I can't remember the last time you
expressed love or compassion here. When I think of you Steven, love is a
far distant emotion. What about you? Do you love me, as a good Christian
must?
Well let's see -- of the two of us, which has wished the other dead? I
would never wish you dead, little buddy. I wish you a long, happy,
healthy life. Let's see, just the other day I told Doc I was sorry to
hear of his health problems, and I wish him well. And I sincerely do. I
want no harm to come to anyone. I have noticed other posters here who
do not always wish good health to others. So I don't know what more I
can do for you, little buddy. I really, truly, and sincerely wish you
all the best life has to offer. What more can I say?
HA!!!! Cut the craP!!!! I wish you a long painfull and unhappy life (and
death)!!!
]
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: Santa - Satan |
23 Dec 2006 09:07:47 PM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
I don't support the intentional killing of innocents.
Then you are a contradiction of yourself, because the US
military
under the Bush administration finds it an acceptable trade-off
to
have innocents killed if it means taking out a few
questionable
characters and not putting our own soldiers at risk.
The innocents are not intentionally targeted, are they?
The innocents are intentionally allowed to die alongside
the bad guys, because the military would rather that the
innocents die than risk loss of our own soldiers in a
direct confrontation. It's bombing from 20,000 feet...
collateral damage is acceptable.
Oh, the way Clinton ordered the bombing of Belgrade?
Indeed it is... but Clinton didn't start that fight out of
thin air (the Serbs were bent on mass murdering the Kosovo
muslims, and Clinton did what he could to stop it).
Do you realize Saddam put FAR MORE people in mass graves than
Milosevic
could have ever hoped to? But you don't care about that, do you?
You still really want to support Bush, don't you, even though
he essentially 'invented' a conflict in Iraq. Amazing. You're
hopeless Stephen.
You're an amazing hypocrite, Randolph.
Sorry Stephen, you can't win this one... but you can be
remembered in history as siding with the criminals, losers,
and idiots if you want to.
Well, before you pick up your marbles and declare victory, maybe you
should answer a couple of questions you ignored -- for instance, what
was Milosevic's provocation that caused Clinton to bomb Belgrade? And
do you realize that Saddam put FAR MORE people in mass graves than
Milosevic could have ever hoped to? Do you care about that? Probably
not since you failed to answer it the first time around.
See there, you've asked and answered your own question.
Everyone knows Bush and his gang lied to get us into the Iraq
war,
"Everyone knows" just like "everyone knows" our troops left Vietnam
from the roof of the US Embassy in Saigon in 1975, you goof?
Only you know about that vietnam thing.
Regardless, do you also believe Richard Gephardt lied? Did Tony Blair
lie? How about Jay Rockefeller? John Edwards? John Kerry? Hillary
Clinton? Did the Clinton appointed CIA director also lie? Please
respond.
Connecting al-qaeda to iraq in all their public speeches was a
lie. Doctoring the NIE to give the appearance that Iraq was an
imminent threat was a lie. Feeding Colin Powell a boat-load of
crap for regurgitation to the UN was a humungous lie. Here is
Powell's Chief of Staff Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson coming out
with some of the dirt.
http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/transcriptNOW205_full.html
Stephen, you are a true fool to continue apologizing for Bush,
and supporting his errors. Your children will pay for Bush's
errors in thinking.
You have no ground to stand on, and you (just like the Hitler
Henchmen) cannot fight the truth.
then did all the stupidest things to ensure that we can't
win. Whether you continue to support that is your decision.
There is no doubt many mistakes were made.
Boy, Bush and Cheney made a mistake by lying to get us into
that war. Their stupidity drove us into that mess, and they continue
deluding themselves. If we left Iraq 2 years ago it wouldn't
be soon enough.
But then mistakes are made
in every war. It's really a good thing today's leftist loonies (like
you) weren't around for the invasion of France during World War II.
They'd have no doubt been critical of military planning surrounding
D-Day, and later the Battle of the Bulge. Multiple thousands of troops
were killed during the D-Day invasion, as well as later during the
Battle of the Bulge. Today's loony left wouldn't have stood for that,
would they? Nope, they'd have said we must bring the troops home now,
and let Hitler have his way!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Santa - Satan |
23 Dec 2006 09:53:22 PM |
|
|
Perseid wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
I don't support the intentional killing of innocents.
Then you are a contradiction of yourself, because the US
military
under the Bush administration finds it an acceptable trade-off
to
have innocents killed if it means taking out a few
questionable
characters and not putting our own soldiers at risk.
The innocents are not intentionally targeted, are they?
The innocents are intentionally allowed to die alongside
the bad guys, because the military would rather that the
innocents die than risk loss of our own soldiers in a
direct confrontation. It's bombing from 20,000 feet...
collateral damage is acceptable.
Oh, the way Clinton ordered the bombing of Belgrade?
Indeed it is... but Clinton didn't start that fight out of
thin air (the Serbs were bent on mass murdering the Kosovo
muslims, and Clinton did what he could to stop it).
Do you realize Saddam put FAR MORE people in mass graves than
Milosevic
could have ever hoped to? But you don't care about that, do you?
You still really want to support Bush, don't you, even though
he essentially 'invented' a conflict in Iraq. Amazing. You're
hopeless Stephen.
You're an amazing hypocrite, Randolph.
Sorry Stephen, you can't win this one... but you can be
remembered in history as siding with the criminals, losers,
and idiots if you want to.
Well, before you pick up your marbles and declare victory, maybe you
should answer a couple of questions you ignored -- for instance, what
was Milosevic's provocation that caused Clinton to bomb Belgrade? And
do you realize that Saddam put FAR MORE people in mass graves than
Milosevic could have ever hoped to? Do you care about that? Probably
not since you failed to answer it the first time around.
See there, you've asked and answered your own question.
Because I knew you'd weasel your way out of answering it once again.
And, of course, I was right. So let's look at the topic you're avoiding
-- you said our attack on Saddam was without provocation, and I asked
you for Milosevic's provocation.
And your response? <crickets>
Then I asked you if you were aware that Saddam put FAR MORE people into
mass graves than Milosevic could have ever hoped to?
And your response? <crickets>
Do you even realize what a major hypocrite you are, Randolph?
Everyone knows Bush and his gang lied to get us into the Iraq
war,
"Everyone knows" just like "everyone knows" our troops left Vietnam
from the roof of the US Embassy in Saigon in 1975, you goof?
Only you know about that vietnam thing.
You're proven, without a doubt, that you certainly don't know the first
thing about it.
Regardless, do you also believe Richard Gephardt lied? Did Tony Blair
lie? How about Jay Rockefeller? John Edwards? John Kerry? Hillary
Clinton? Did the Clinton appointed CIA director also lie? Please
respond.
Connecting al-qaeda to iraq in all their public speeches was a
lie.
You mean like this? "In the four years since the inspectors left,
intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his
chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability,
and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary
to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members ..." like that?
Doctoring the NIE to give the appearance that Iraq was an
imminent threat was a lie.
Can you document that statement?
Feeding Colin Powell a boat-load of crap for regurgitation
to the UN was a humungous lie.
Are you referring to the Clinton appointed CIA director, who sat beside
Powell during that speech?
Here is Powell's Chief of Staff Colonel Lawrence
Wilkerson coming out with some of the dirt.
http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/transcriptNOW205_full.html
Looks like unsubstantiated allegations to me. David Kay does not
believe CIA analysts were pressured to come up with any particular
conclusion. And, as the article you posted also says, if the
intelligence community was so doubtful, why wasn't there a louder
chorus of dissension? Instead, the Clinton appointed CIA director was
telling everyone, incluing Powell and Wilkerson, that the intelligence
was a slam dunk.
Stephen, you are a true fool to continue apologizing for Bush,
I'm not apologizing for anything. I'm stating facts while you're
stating unsubstantiated allegations as if they were facts (because you
so desperately want to believe, and have everyone else believe, your
loony leftist BS).
and supporting his errors. Your children will pay for Bush's
errors in thinking.
The fact is, however we got there, we are where we are. And now the
question is what we're going to do about it. I want the democratic
Iraqi government to succeed, while you want it to fail. You want the
terrorists to win, I want the Iraqi people to win.
You have no ground to stand on, and you (just like the Hitler
Henchmen) cannot fight the truth.
The reason I can refute your loony leftist BS is because it's *not* the
truth.
then did all the stupidest things to ensure that we can't
win. Whether you continue to support that is your decision.
There is no doubt many mistakes were made.
Boy, Bush and Cheney made a mistake by lying to get us into
that war. Their stupidity drove us into that mess, and they continue
deluding themselves. If we left Iraq 2 years ago it wouldn't
be soon enough.
Cut & run -- that's your motto. It's really a good thing today's
leftist loonies (like you) weren't around for the invasion of France
during World War II. They'd have no doubt been critical of military
planning surrounding D-Day, and later the Battle of the Bulge. Multiple
thousands of troops were killed during the D-Day invasion, as well as
during the Battle of the Bulge. Today's loony left wouldn't have stood
for that, would they? Nope, they'd have said we must bring the troops
home now, and let Hitler have his way!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: Santa - Satan |
23 Dec 2006 10:42:04 PM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
Here is Powell's Chief of Staff Colonel Lawrence
Wilkerson coming out with some of the dirt.
http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/transcriptNOW205_full.html
You have no ground to stand on, and you (just like the Hitler
Henchmen) cannot fight the truth.
The reason I can refute your loony leftist BS is because it's *not* the
truth.
The reason you 'try' to refute what I say is because you don't
have a clue what the truth is. The Bush monkeys and their laps
dogs (that would be you) spew so many lies that you have confused
even yourselves.
All I can say is... I'm very sorry for you, and sorry for
all American children who will pay for your mistakes for
generations to come.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Santa - Satan |
23 Dec 2006 10:51:38 PM |
|
|
Perseid wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
Here is Powell's Chief of Staff Colonel Lawrence
Wilkerson coming out with some of the dirt.
http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/transcriptNOW205_full.html
You have no ground to stand on, and you (just like the Hitler
Henchmen) cannot fight the truth.
The reason I can refute your loony leftist BS is because it's *not* the
truth.
The reason you 'try' to refute what I say is because you don't
have a clue what the truth is. The Bush monkeys and their laps
dogs (that would be you) spew so many lies that you have confused
even yourselves.
That's about the weakest response I could have expected from you.
All I can say is...
All you can say is another empty platitude, because you have no real
argument after I refuted your previous unsubstantiated allegations.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: Santa - Satan |
24 Dec 2006 12:27:41 AM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
Here is Powell's Chief of Staff Colonel Lawrence
Wilkerson coming out with some of the dirt.
http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/transcriptNOW205_full.html
You have no ground to stand on, and you (just like the Hitler
Henchmen) cannot fight the truth.
The reason I can refute your loony leftist BS is because it's *not*
the
truth.
The reason you 'try' to refute what I say is because you don't
have a clue what the truth is. The Bush monkeys and their laps
dogs (that would be you) spew so many lies that you have confused
even yourselves.
That's about the weakest response I could have expected from you.
You don't deserve much more. You stick to weak intelligence and
misguided individuals like you stick to religious dogma. You
have no arguments to make Stephen. Jesus Christ hated people
who stuck dogmatically to tradition (you'd know this if you
actually were reading the Bible).
All I can say is...
All you can say is another empty platitude, because you have no real
argument after I refuted your previous unsubstantiated allegations.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Santa - Satan |
24 Dec 2006 12:44:55 AM |
|
|
Perseid wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
Here is Powell's Chief of Staff Colonel Lawrence
Wilkerson coming out with some of the dirt.
http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/transcriptNOW205_full.html
You have no ground to stand on, and you (just like the Hitler
Henchmen) cannot fight the truth.
The reason I can refute your loony leftist BS is because it's *not*
the
truth.
The reason you 'try' to refute what I say is because you don't
have a clue what the truth is. The Bush monkeys and their laps
dogs (that would be you) spew so many lies that you have confused
even yourselves.
That's about the weakest response I could have expected from you.
You don't deserve much more. You stick to weak intelligence and
misguided individuals like you stick to religious dogma. You
have no arguments to make Stephen. Jesus Christ hated people
who stuck dogmatically to tradition (you'd know this if you
actually were reading the Bible).
More platitudes from you. And now you're once again instructing me on
religion. Why don't you give me the exact Bible verse you're referring
to, and let's see if it applies to me.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: Santa - Satan |
24 Dec 2006 09:53:15 AM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
Here is Powell's Chief of Staff Colonel Lawrence
Wilkerson coming out with some of the dirt.
http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/transcriptNOW205_full.html
You have no ground to stand on, and you (just like the Hitler
Henchmen) cannot fight the truth.
The reason I can refute your loony leftist BS is because it's
*not*
the
truth.
The reason you 'try' to refute what I say is because you don't
have a clue what the truth is. The Bush monkeys and their laps
dogs (that would be you) spew so many lies that you have confused
even yourselves.
That's about the weakest response I could have expected from you.
You don't deserve much more. You stick to weak intelligence and
misguided individuals like you stick to religious dogma. You
have no arguments to make Stephen. Jesus Christ hated people
who stuck dogmatically to tradition (you'd know this if you
actually were reading the Bible).
More platitudes from you.
Is that the latest word from your bible study class ?
And now you're once again instructing me on
religion. Why don't you give me the exact Bible verse you're referring
to, and let's see if it applies to me.
Sorry, the bible isn't an authoritative source, either of
history or morality. You bible thumpers have been misled.
Try looking to the life of Jesus for your guidance.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Santa - Satan |
24 Dec 2006 02:38:26 PM |
|
|
Perseid wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
Here is Powell's Chief of Staff Colonel Lawrence
Wilkerson coming out with some of the dirt.
http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/transcriptNOW205_full.html
You have no ground to stand on, and you (just like the Hitler
Henchmen) cannot fight the truth.
The reason I can refute your loony leftist BS is because it's
*not*
the
truth.
The reason you 'try' to refute what I say is because you don't
have a clue what the truth is. The Bush monkeys and their laps
dogs (that would be you) spew so many lies that you have confused
even yourselves.
That's about the weakest response I could have expected from you.
You don't deserve much more. You stick to weak intelligence and
misguided individuals like you stick to religious dogma. You
have no arguments to make Stephen. Jesus Christ hated people
who stuck dogmatically to tradition (you'd know this if you
actually were reading the Bible).
More platitudes from you.
Is that the latest word from your bible study class ?
What? And please make up your mind -- first you say I'm all about
religious dogma, and then you turn around and say I'd know something
about Jesus if I actually were reading the Bible -- and then you turn
around imply I got some word from my Bible study class. So which is it?
Am I actually reading the Bible, or am I not?
And now you're once again instructing me on
religion. Why don't you give me the exact Bible verse you're referring
to, and let's see if it applies to me.
Sorry, the bible isn't an authoritative source, either of
history or morality. You bible thumpers have been misled.
Try looking to the life of Jesus for your guidance.
Then explain to me, in general terms, what you meant by Jesus "hating"
people who stuck dogmatically to tradition. I actually do know the
Bible chapter and verse you're thinking of, but I'm sure you have no
idea what you're talking about. You must have overheard someone else
talking about it, and have come to some misinterpreted conclusion based
on that. So please inform me with your great wisdom of the life of
Jesus, and tell me what I should be doing (based on the teachings of
Jesus, which, of course, you know so well).
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: Santa - Satan |
25 Dec 2006 02:46:45 AM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
Sorry, the bible isn't an authoritative source, either of
history or morality. You bible thumpers have been misled.
Try looking to the life of Jesus for your guidance.
Then explain to me, in general terms, what you meant by Jesus "hating"
people who stuck dogmatically to tradition.
If you spent less time memorizing chapters and verses and more
time thinking about what Jesus actually did in his adult ministry,
you wouldn't have said something like that. Jesus' life and ministry
is well known even to school children.
I actually do know the
Bible chapter and verse you're thinking of, but I'm sure you have no
idea what you're talking about.
I'd say you've already proved my point for me. All you can
do is boast about knowing some chapter and verse, but you
don't appear to know much about the subject material.
Explain something for me Stephen. Why is the fundamentalist
christian right wing so consumed about saving their own
sorry-***** lives that they promote unilateral invasion of
a country that didn't even attack us ?
Are you guys really that concerned about your own lives ?
You talk all the time about gang members who might kill
you in south LA. You're obsessed with saving your own sorry
life. It's really pathetic Stephen.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: Santa - Satan |
25 Dec 2006 09:43:23 AM |
|
|
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns98A412196A1A2rrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
Sorry, the bible isn't an authoritative source, either of
history or morality. You bible thumpers have been misled.
Try looking to the life of Jesus for your guidance.
Then explain to me, in general terms, what you meant by Jesus "hating"
people who stuck dogmatically to tradition.
If you spent less time memorizing chapters and verses and more
time thinking about what Jesus actually did in his adult ministry,
you wouldn't have said something like that. Jesus' life and ministry
is well known even to school children.
I actually do know the
Bible chapter and verse you're thinking of, but I'm sure you have no
idea what you're talking about.
I'd say you've already proved my point for me. All you can
do is boast about knowing some chapter and verse, but you
don't appear to know much about the subject material.
Self-preservation and self enrichment trumps the risk taking love and
nurture at the heart of the gospel. It's a tough thing to overcome.
Explain something for me Stephen. Why is the fundamentalist
christian right wing so consumed about saving their own
sorry-***** lives that they promote unilateral invasion of
a country that didn't even attack us ?
Are you guys really that concerned about your own lives ?
You talk all the time about gang members who might kill
you in south LA. You're obsessed with saving your own sorry
life. It's really pathetic Stephen.
And I think Jesus would say to you, Randy, that you're closer to the
kingdom of God than you might think.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Santa - Satan |
25 Dec 2006 03:07:52 PM |
|
|
John Lemke wrote:
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns98A412196A1A2rrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
Sorry, the bible isn't an authoritative source, either of
history or morality. You bible thumpers have been misled.
Try looking to the life of Jesus for your guidance.
Then explain to me, in general terms, what you meant by Jesus "hating"
people who stuck dogmatically to tradition.
If you spent less time memorizing chapters and verses and more
time thinking about what Jesus actually did in his adult ministry,
you wouldn't have said something like that. Jesus' life and ministry
is well known even to school children.
I actually do know the
Bible chapter and verse you're thinking of, but I'm sure you have no
idea what you're talking about.
I'd say you've already proved my point for me. All you can
do is boast about knowing some chapter and verse, but you
don't appear to know much about the subject material.
Self-preservation and self enrichment trumps the risk taking love and
nurture at the heart of the gospel. It's a tough thing to overcome.
Is that another backhanded slap aimed at me? Just curious, that's all.
Explain something for me Stephen. Why is the fundamentalist
christian right wing so consumed about saving their own
sorry-***** lives that they promote unilateral invasion of
a country that didn't even attack us ?
Are you guys really that concerned about your own lives ?
You talk all the time about gang members who might kill
you in south LA. You're obsessed with saving your own sorry
life. It's really pathetic Stephen.
And I think Jesus would say to you, Randy, that you're closer to the
kingdom of God than you might think.
One has to seek the kingdom of God. I hope Randolph is actually doing
that. Merry Christmas to you, John.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
