-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I've been very busy lately, but this is MUCH too important
not to address, if only briefly. Let's be clear about this...
I'm reminding every registered Republican voter in America
to aggressively boycott every Senator, regardless of party
affiliation, who voted with the Liberals against bringing
the **Marriage Protection Amendment** to the Senate floor
for an up-or-down vote last week:
[begin quote http://www.bpnews.net/storydownloadall.asp?mo=6&da=7&yr=2006]
"The United States Senate defeated June 7 an attempt to
halt debate and proceed to a vote on the Marriage
Protection Amendment, S.J. Res. 1. The parliamentary
procedure is known as "invoking cloture."
The roll call was 49-48 in favor of holding a vote on
the amendment, but the effort needed 60 votes to
succeed.
How the senators voted is listed below, arranged in
categories of "yes," "no" and "not voting." A "yes"
vote means a senator was in favor of bringing the
amendment to the floor for an up-or-down vote.
How the senators voted is listed below, arranged in
categories of "yes," "no" and "not voting." A "yes"
vote means a senator was in favor of bringing the
amendment to the floor for an up-or-down vote.
YES (49): DEMOCRATS (2) -- Robert Byrd, W.Va.; Ben
Nelson, Neb. REPUBLICANS (47) -- Lamar Alexander,
Tenn.; Wayne Allard, Colo.; George Allen, Va.; Robert
Bennett, Utah; Christopher Bond, Mo.; Sam Brownback,
Kan.; Jim Bunning, Ky.; Conrad Burns, Mont.; Richard
Burr, N.C.; Saxby Chambliss, Ga.; Tom Coburn, Okla.;
Thad Cochran, Miss.; Norm Coleman, Minn.; John Cornyn,
Texas; Larry Craig, Idaho; Michael Crapo, Idaho; Jim
DeMint, S.C.; Mike DeWine, Ohio; Elizabeth Dole, N.C.;
Pete Domenici, N.M.; John Ensign, Nev.; Michael Enzi,
Wyo.; Bill Frist, Tenn.; Lindsey Graham, S.C.; Charles
Grassley, Iowa; Orrin Hatch, Utah; Kay Hutchison,
Texas; James Inhofe, Okla.; Johnny Isakson, Ga.; Jon
Kyl, Ariz.; Trent Lott, Miss.; Richard Lugar, Ind.; Mel
Martinez, Fla.; Mitch McConnell, Ky.; Lisa Murkowski,
Alaska; Pat Roberts, Kan.; Rick Santorum, Pa.; Jeff
Sessions, Ala.; Richard Shelby, Ala.; Gordon Smith,
Ore.; Ted Stevens, Alaska; Jim Talent, Mo.; Craig
Thomas, Wyo.; John Thune, S.D.; David Vitter, La.;
George Voinovich, Ohio; John Warner, Va.
NO (48): DEMOCRATS (40) -- Daniel Akaka, Hawaii; Max
Baucus, Mont.; Evan Bayh, Ind.; Joseph Biden, Del.;
Jeff Bingaman, N.M.; Barbara Boxer, Calif.; Maria
Cantwell, Wash.; Thomas Carper, Del.; Hillary Clinton,
N.Y.; Kent Conrad, N.D.; Mark Dayton, Minn.; Byron
Dorgan, N.D.; Richard Durbin, Ill.; Russ Feingold,
Wis.; Dianne Feinstein, Calif.; Tom Harkin, Iowa;
Daniel Inouye, Hawaii; Tim Johnson, S.D.; Edward
Kennedy, Mass.; John Kerry, Mass.; Herbert Kohl, Wis.;
Mary Landrieu, La.; Frank Lautenberg, N.J.; Patrick
Leahy, Vt.; Carl Levin, Mich.; Joseph Lieberman, Conn.;
Blanche Lincoln, Ark.; Robert Menendez, N.J.; Barbara
Mikulski, Md.; Patty Murray, Wash.; Bill Nelson, Fla.;
Barack Obama, Ill.; Mark Pryor, Ark.; Jack Reed, R.I.;
Harry Reid, Nev.; Ken Salazar, Colo.; Paul Sarbanes,
Md.; Charles Schumer, N.Y.; Debbie Stabenow, Mich.; Ron
Wyden, Ore. REPUBLICANS (7) -- Lincoln Chafee, R.I.;
Susan Collins, Maine; Judd Gregg, N.H.; John McCain,
Ariz.; Olympia Snowe, Maine; Arlen Specter, Pa.; John
Sununu, N.H. INDEPENDENTS (1) -- James Jeffords, Vt.
NOT VOTING (3): DEMOCRATS (2) -- Christopher Dodd,
Conn.; John Rockefeller, W.Va. REPUBLICANS (1) -- Chuck
Hagel, Neb."
[end quote]
The seven Republicans listed above who voted "No" on this
crucially-important issue should be blacklisted and voted
out of office A.S.A.P.! These "sinful seven" traitors are:
Lincoln Chafee, R.I.
Susan Collins, Maine
Judd Gregg, N.H.
John McCain, Ariz.
Olympia Snowe, Maine
Arlen Specter, Pa.
John Sununu, N.H.
The only possible way for these seven notorious anarchists
to redeem themselves would be if they vote "Yes" next time
this issue is brought to a vote.
We need to amend the U.S. Constitution to protect our God-
given *sacred* institution of marriage against anti-Christ
Liberals who want to drag America down into the fiery pits
of Hades.
Remember, Jesus explicitly warned what shall occur when we
see the Abomination of Desolation standing in the place of
holy matrimony (as foresaw Daniel the prophet from Babylon).
Here's what St. Malachy O'Morgair(1095-1148) wrote about it:
"In persecutione extrema romanae ecclesiae
In the persecution extreme of the roman ekklesia
sedebit Petrus Romanus, qui pascet oves in
to sit Peter the Roman, who to feed the sheep in
multis tribulationibus; quibus transactis,
great tribulation; in which to transact,
civitas septis-collis diruetur, et Judex
the city seven- hilled's destruction, and Judge
tremendus judicabit populum suum. Amen."
tremendous will judge the populace her own. Amen.
--interlinear translation by Daniel Joseph Min
The sooner we defeat the Anti-Christ Liberal enemy, then
the shorter these days of the worst tribulation in world
history (worse even than the worldwide flood in the days
of Noah, c. 28,000 BC) will be. Only our heavenly Father
might know for sure (not even Jesus knows, as He admitted)
how much sooner than c. 2331 AD the temple will be purged
and made right, but the longer the Liberals drag this out,
the longer and more deadly that the worldwide apocalyptic
tribulation -- by the element Fire -- shall prove to be(!).
I hope every Republican Senator on Capitol Hill will take
this matter seriously,--deadly seriously,--next time this
issue comes up for a vote.
In Vigilance,
Daniel Joseph Min
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B1CCFE7
*Download Min's Banned (Freeware) Books:
http://www.angelfire.com/moon2/danieljosephmin/
*NEW! Take Min's Spiritual I.Q. Test:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=HCRHGLQM38786.0401967593@anonymous.poster
*Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=XJBDEJF138262.9022453704@anonymous.poster
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBRJK9tZljD7YrHM/nEQJqcACgpBrfglzN6gmFl23upfJX6S1SiyAAn1GI
4v7cPRhRlyt3Z4a+AX6DHTqP
=T1FC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
`
.
|
|
| User: "Charly the Bastard" |
|
| Title: Re: Say *YES* on Marriage Protection Amendment |
17 Jun 2006 08:03:04 AM |
|
|
--------------60B9E98C5A893D070D240D70
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Telescope wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I've been very busy lately, but this is MUCH too important
not to address, if only briefly. Let's be clear about this...
I'm reminding every registered Republican voter in America
to aggressively boycott every Senator, regardless of party
affiliation, who voted with the Liberals against bringing
the **Marriage Protection Amendment** to the Senate floor
for an up-or-down vote last week:
[begin quote http://www.bpnews.net/storydownloadall.asp?mo=6&da=7&yr=2006]
"The United States Senate defeated June 7 an attempt to
halt debate and proceed to a vote on the Marriage
Protection Amendment, S.J. Res. 1. The parliamentary
procedure is known as "invoking cloture."
The roll call was 49-48 in favor of holding a vote on
the amendment, but the effort needed 60 votes to
succeed.
How the senators voted is listed below, arranged in
categories of "yes," "no" and "not voting." A "yes"
vote means a senator was in favor of bringing the
amendment to the floor for an up-or-down vote.
How the senators voted is listed below, arranged in
categories of "yes," "no" and "not voting." A "yes"
vote means a senator was in favor of bringing the
amendment to the floor for an up-or-down vote.
YES (49): DEMOCRATS (2) -- Robert Byrd, W.Va.; Ben
Nelson, Neb. REPUBLICANS (47) -- Lamar Alexander,
Tenn.; Wayne Allard, Colo.; George Allen, Va.; Robert
Bennett, Utah; Christopher Bond, Mo.; Sam Brownback,
Kan.; Jim Bunning, Ky.; Conrad Burns, Mont.; Richard
Burr, N.C.; Saxby Chambliss, Ga.; Tom Coburn, Okla.;
Thad Cochran, Miss.; Norm Coleman, Minn.; John Cornyn,
Texas; Larry Craig, Idaho; Michael Crapo, Idaho; Jim
DeMint, S.C.; Mike DeWine, Ohio; Elizabeth Dole, N.C.;
Pete Domenici, N.M.; John Ensign, Nev.; Michael Enzi,
Wyo.; Bill Frist, Tenn.; Lindsey Graham, S.C.; Charles
Grassley, Iowa; Orrin Hatch, Utah; Kay Hutchison,
Texas; James Inhofe, Okla.; Johnny Isakson, Ga.; Jon
Kyl, Ariz.; Trent Lott, Miss.; Richard Lugar, Ind.; Mel
Martinez, Fla.; Mitch McConnell, Ky.; Lisa Murkowski,
Alaska; Pat Roberts, Kan.; Rick Santorum, Pa.; Jeff
Sessions, Ala.; Richard Shelby, Ala.; Gordon Smith,
Ore.; Ted Stevens, Alaska; Jim Talent, Mo.; Craig
Thomas, Wyo.; John Thune, S.D.; David Vitter, La.;
George Voinovich, Ohio; John Warner, Va.
NO (48): DEMOCRATS (40) -- Daniel Akaka, Hawaii; Max
Baucus, Mont.; Evan Bayh, Ind.; Joseph Biden, Del.;
Jeff Bingaman, N.M.; Barbara Boxer, Calif.; Maria
Cantwell, Wash.; Thomas Carper, Del.; Hillary Clinton,
N.Y.; Kent Conrad, N.D.; Mark Dayton, Minn.; Byron
Dorgan, N.D.; Richard Durbin, Ill.; Russ Feingold,
Wis.; Dianne Feinstein, Calif.; Tom Harkin, Iowa;
Daniel Inouye, Hawaii; Tim Johnson, S.D.; Edward
Kennedy, Mass.; John Kerry, Mass.; Herbert Kohl, Wis.;
Mary Landrieu, La.; Frank Lautenberg, N.J.; Patrick
Leahy, Vt.; Carl Levin, Mich.; Joseph Lieberman, Conn.;
Blanche Lincoln, Ark.; Robert Menendez, N.J.; Barbara
Mikulski, Md.; Patty Murray, Wash.; Bill Nelson, Fla.;
Barack Obama, Ill.; Mark Pryor, Ark.; Jack Reed, R.I.;
Harry Reid, Nev.; Ken Salazar, Colo.; Paul Sarbanes,
Md.; Charles Schumer, N.Y.; Debbie Stabenow, Mich.; Ron
Wyden, Ore. REPUBLICANS (7) -- Lincoln Chafee, R.I.;
Susan Collins, Maine; Judd Gregg, N.H.; John McCain,
Ariz.; Olympia Snowe, Maine; Arlen Specter, Pa.; John
Sununu, N.H. INDEPENDENTS (1) -- James Jeffords, Vt.
NOT VOTING (3): DEMOCRATS (2) -- Christopher Dodd,
Conn.; John Rockefeller, W.Va. REPUBLICANS (1) -- Chuck
Hagel, Neb."
I'm shocked and amazed, Min actually posted useful information. Now I know which
homophobic Neo-Fascist wannabes to vote against in November. Freedom Min, what a
concept. You aught to try it sometime. It was in all the papers, like the Articles
of Confederation, the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution. BTW, Jesus
wasn't a conservative. The Pharisees were conservative. Sad, but true. Get used to
it.
Charly
--------------60B9E98C5A893D070D240D70
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Telescope wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
<p>I've been very busy lately, but this is MUCH too important
<br>not to address, if only briefly. Let's be clear about this...
<p>I'm reminding every registered Republican voter in America
<br>to aggressively boycott every Senator, regardless of party
<br>affiliation, who voted with the Liberals against bringing
<br>the **Marriage Protection Amendment** to the Senate floor
<br>for an up-or-down vote last week:
<p>[begin quote <a href="http://www.bpnews.net/storydownloadall.asp?mo=6&da=7&yr=2006">http://www.bpnews.net/storydownloadall.asp?mo=6&da=7&yr=2006</a>]
<p>"The United States Senate defeated June 7 an attempt to
<br> halt debate and proceed to a vote on the Marriage
<br> Protection Amendment, S.J. Res. 1. The parliamentary
<br> procedure is known as "invoking cloture."
<p> The roll call was 49-48 in favor of holding a vote on
<br> the amendment, but the effort needed 60 votes to
<br> succeed.
<p> How the senators voted is listed below, arranged in
<br> categories of "yes," "no" and "not voting." A "yes"
<br> vote means a senator was in favor of bringing the
<br> amendment to the floor for an up-or-down vote.
<p> How the senators voted is listed below, arranged in
<br> categories of "yes," "no" and "not voting." A "yes"
<br> vote means a senator was in favor of bringing the
<br> amendment to the floor for an up-or-down vote.
<p> YES (49): DEMOCRATS (2) -- Robert Byrd, W.Va.; Ben
<br> Nelson, Neb. REPUBLICANS (47) -- Lamar Alexander,
<br> Tenn.; Wayne Allard, Colo.; George Allen, Va.; Robert
<br> Bennett, Utah; Christopher Bond, Mo.; Sam Brownback,
<br> Kan.; Jim Bunning, Ky.; Conrad Burns, Mont.; Richard
<br> Burr, N.C.; Saxby Chambliss, Ga.; Tom Coburn, Okla.;
<br> Thad Cochran, Miss.; Norm Coleman, Minn.; John Cornyn,
<br> Texas; Larry Craig, Idaho; Michael Crapo, Idaho; Jim
<br> DeMint, S.C.; Mike DeWine, Ohio; Elizabeth Dole, N.C.;
<br> Pete Domenici, N.M.; John Ensign, Nev.; Michael Enzi,
<br> Wyo.; Bill Frist, Tenn.; Lindsey Graham, S.C.; Charles
<br> Grassley, Iowa; Orrin Hatch, Utah; Kay Hutchison,
<br> Texas; James Inhofe, Okla.; Johnny Isakson, Ga.; Jon
<br> Kyl, Ariz.; Trent Lott, Miss.; Richard Lugar, Ind.; Mel
<br> Martinez, Fla.; Mitch McConnell, Ky.; Lisa Murkowski,
<br> Alaska; Pat Roberts, Kan.; Rick Santorum, Pa.; Jeff
<br> Sessions, Ala.; Richard Shelby, Ala.; Gordon Smith,
<br> Ore.; Ted Stevens, Alaska; Jim Talent, Mo.; Craig
<br> Thomas, Wyo.; John Thune, S.D.; David Vitter, La.;
<br> George Voinovich, Ohio; John Warner, Va.
<p> NO (48): DEMOCRATS (40) -- Daniel Akaka, Hawaii; Max
<br> Baucus, Mont.; Evan Bayh, Ind.; Joseph Biden, Del.;
<br> Jeff Bingaman, N.M.; Barbara Boxer, Calif.; Maria
<br> Cantwell, Wash.; Thomas Carper, Del.; Hillary Clinton,
<br> N.Y.; Kent Conrad, N.D.; Mark Dayton, Minn.; Byron
<br> Dorgan, N.D.; Richard Durbin, Ill.; Russ Feingold,
<br> Wis.; Dianne Feinstein, Calif.; Tom Harkin, Iowa;
<br> Daniel Inouye, Hawaii; Tim Johnson, S.D.; Edward
<br> Kennedy, Mass.; John Kerry, Mass.; Herbert Kohl, Wis.;
<br> Mary Landrieu, La.; Frank Lautenberg, N.J.; Patrick
<br> Leahy, Vt.; Carl Levin, Mich.; Joseph Lieberman, Conn.;
<br> Blanche Lincoln, Ark.; Robert Menendez, N.J.; Barbara
<br> Mikulski, Md.; Patty Murray, Wash.; Bill Nelson, Fla.;
<br> Barack Obama, Ill.; Mark Pryor, Ark.; Jack Reed, R.I.;
<br> Harry Reid, Nev.; Ken Salazar, Colo.; Paul Sarbanes,
<br> Md.; Charles Schumer, N.Y.; Debbie Stabenow, Mich.; Ron
<br> Wyden, Ore. REPUBLICANS (7) -- Lincoln Chafee, R.I.;
<br> Susan Collins, Maine; Judd Gregg, N.H.; John McCain,
<br> Ariz.; Olympia Snowe, Maine; Arlen Specter, Pa.; John
<br> Sununu, N.H. INDEPENDENTS (1) -- James Jeffords, Vt.
<p> NOT VOTING (3): DEMOCRATS (2) -- Christopher Dodd,
<br> Conn.; John Rockefeller, W.Va. REPUBLICANS (1) -- Chuck
<br> Hagel, Neb."
<br> </blockquote>
I'm shocked and amazed, Min actually posted useful information. Now I know
which homophobic Neo-Fascist wannabes to vote against in November. Freedom
Min, what a concept. You aught to try it sometime. It was in all the papers,
like the Articles of Confederation, the Declaration of Independence, the
Constitution. BTW, Jesus wasn't a conservative. The Pharisees were
conservative. Sad, but true. Get used to it.
<p>Charly
<br>
<br> </html>
--------------60B9E98C5A893D070D240D70--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: Say *YES* on Marriage Protection Amendment |
17 Jun 2006 09:45:45 PM |
|
|
Charly the ***** <nitecrawler7@worldnet.att.net> Spat the Words
Telescope wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I've been very busy lately, but this is MUCH too important
not to address, if only briefly. Let's be clear about this...
I'm reminding every registered Republican voter in America
to aggressively boycott every Senator, regardless of party
affiliation, who voted with the Liberals against bringing
the **Marriage Protection Amendment** to the Senate floor
for an up-or-down vote last week:
[begin quote
http://www.bpnews.net/storydownloadall.asp?mo=6&da=7&yr=2006]
"The United States Senate defeated June 7 an attempt to
halt debate and proceed to a vote on the Marriage
Protection Amendment, S.J. Res. 1. The parliamentary
procedure is known as "invoking cloture."
The roll call was 49-48 in favor of holding a vote on
the amendment, but the effort needed 60 votes to
succeed.
How the senators voted is listed below, arranged in
categories of "yes," "no" and "not voting." A "yes"
vote means a senator was in favor of bringing the
amendment to the floor for an up-or-down vote.
How the senators voted is listed below, arranged in
categories of "yes," "no" and "not voting." A "yes"
vote means a senator was in favor of bringing the
amendment to the floor for an up-or-down vote.
YES (49): DEMOCRATS (2) -- Robert Byrd, W.Va.; Ben
Nelson, Neb. REPUBLICANS (47) -- Lamar Alexander,
Tenn.; Wayne Allard, Colo.; George Allen, Va.; Robert
Bennett, Utah; Christopher Bond, Mo.; Sam Brownback,
Kan.; Jim Bunning, Ky.; Conrad Burns, Mont.; Richard
Burr, N.C.; Saxby Chambliss, Ga.; Tom Coburn, Okla.;
Thad Cochran, Miss.; Norm Coleman, Minn.; John Cornyn,
Texas; Larry Craig, Idaho; Michael Crapo, Idaho; Jim
DeMint, S.C.; Mike DeWine, Ohio; Elizabeth Dole, N.C.;
Pete Domenici, N.M.; John Ensign, Nev.; Michael Enzi,
Wyo.; Bill Frist, Tenn.; Lindsey Graham, S.C.; Charles
Grassley, Iowa; Orrin Hatch, Utah; Kay Hutchison,
Texas; James Inhofe, Okla.; Johnny Isakson, Ga.; Jon
Kyl, Ariz.; Trent Lott, Miss.; Richard Lugar, Ind.; Mel
Martinez, Fla.; Mitch McConnell, Ky.; Lisa Murkowski,
Alaska; Pat Roberts, Kan.; Rick Santorum, Pa.; Jeff
Sessions, Ala.; Richard Shelby, Ala.; Gordon Smith,
Ore.; Ted Stevens, Alaska; Jim Talent, Mo.; Craig
Thomas, Wyo.; John Thune, S.D.; David Vitter, La.;
George Voinovich, Ohio; John Warner, Va.
NO (48): DEMOCRATS (40) -- Daniel Akaka, Hawaii; Max
Baucus, Mont.; Evan Bayh, Ind.; Joseph Biden, Del.;
Jeff Bingaman, N.M.; Barbara Boxer, Calif.; Maria
Cantwell, Wash.; Thomas Carper, Del.; Hillary Clinton,
N.Y.; Kent Conrad, N.D.; Mark Dayton, Minn.; Byron
Dorgan, N.D.; Richard Durbin, Ill.; Russ Feingold,
Wis.; Dianne Feinstein, Calif.; Tom Harkin, Iowa;
Daniel Inouye, Hawaii; Tim Johnson, S.D.; Edward
Kennedy, Mass.; John Kerry, Mass.; Herbert Kohl, Wis.;
Mary Landrieu, La.; Frank Lautenberg, N.J.; Patrick
Leahy, Vt.; Carl Levin, Mich.; Joseph Lieberman, Conn.;
Blanche Lincoln, Ark.; Robert Menendez, N.J.; Barbara
Mikulski, Md.; Patty Murray, Wash.; Bill Nelson, Fla.;
Barack Obama, Ill.; Mark Pryor, Ark.; Jack Reed, R.I.;
Harry Reid, Nev.; Ken Salazar, Colo.; Paul Sarbanes,
Md.; Charles Schumer, N.Y.; Debbie Stabenow, Mich.; Ron
Wyden, Ore. REPUBLICANS (7) -- Lincoln Chafee, R.I.;
Susan Collins, Maine; Judd Gregg, N.H.; John McCain,
Ariz.; Olympia Snowe, Maine; Arlen Specter, Pa.; John
Sununu, N.H. INDEPENDENTS (1) -- James Jeffords, Vt.
NOT VOTING (3): DEMOCRATS (2) -- Christopher Dodd,
Conn.; John Rockefeller, W.Va. REPUBLICANS (1) -- Chuck
Hagel, Neb."
I'm shocked and amazed, Min actually posted useful information.
Nonetheless, Min should still be bound, gagged, drugged, and
deposited onto an Iraqi street with a sign reading 'the Christian
God rules over the Arabs.'
Now I
know which homophobic Neo-Fascist wannabes to vote against in November.
Freedom Min, what a concept. You aught to try it sometime. It was in all
the papers, like the Articles of Confederation, the Declaration of
Independence, the Constitution. BTW, Jesus wasn't a conservative. The
Pharisees were conservative. Sad, but true. Get used to it.
Charly
.
|
|
|
| User: "Charly the Bastard" |
|
| Title: Re: Say *YES* on Marriage Protection Amendment |
18 Jun 2006 07:09:34 AM |
|
|
Perseid wrote:
Charly the ***** <nitecrawler7@worldnet.att.net> Spat the Words
Telescope wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
snippage
I'm shocked and amazed, Min actually posted useful information.
Nonetheless, Min should still be bound, gagged, drugged, and
deposited onto an Iraqi street with a sign reading 'the Christian
God rules over the Arabs.'
Kinda like Bruce Willis in "Die Hard 3", underwear and a sandwich sign. But
hey, he has the right to post his vitreol, just like we do. Freedom of
Screech. What's really sad is that he doesn't understand pluralism, which is a
backbone concept of Western thought. I pity him. He's missed the boat and is
doomed to live out his life in fear and hatred. Mark Twain summed it up quite
nicely by remarking "In this country, it's every man's God given Right to
stand up in public and make a damn fool of himself."
Charly
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Borked Pseudo Mailed" |
|
| Title: Re: Say *YES* on Marriage Protection Amendment |
16 Jun 2006 11:15:00 AM |
|
|
In article <7CF235C738884.4387847222@twistycreek.com>
Telescope <anon@comments.header> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I've been very busy lately, but this is MUCH too important
not to address, if only briefly. Let's be clear about this...
The Collected Buffoonery of Daniel Joseph Min - Usenet's most failed prophet.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Who is Danny Min?
What does he post?
Examples of failed prophecies
What you should do
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Who is Daniel J. Min?
Daniel J. Min is a denizen of Usenet newsgroups. He posts using various variations on his name, including using asterisks or underlines in place of letters. Often he will post as "Nomen Nescio" or Anonymous, and he used to post as GOD>.
The reason for this is to get around peoples "kill files" or "bozo filters"
However, he consistently posts through anonymous "remailers" in order to disguise his true identity
He posts to various newsgroups, including alt.astrology, alt.astronomy, and alt.prophecies.nostradamus. He posts in any inappropriate newsgroup he deems neccessary.
Additionally Danny has been known to directly email people, once again, using his anonymous remailer service.
What does he post?
Danny posts various garbage claims about astrological influences, and birthdata, which he generally makes up as he goes along. Outstanding amongst his posts include claims to know exactly the birthdata of Jesus Christ, Johannes Kepler, Ptolemy, and various other historical characters.
He posts silly prophecies and claims, and even at times posts his own "kill file list" which has become so large that it's unlikely he even *sees* anyone else s posts anymore.
Some Classic examples of Danny's failed prophecies
(Danny's "prophetic" words are italicized)
Danny predicts the "Great Khan of Terror":
On 15 Nov 1999 22:34:03 -0600, GOD wrote in these newsgroups:
The king of terror will come some time around the month of May in 2000.
At this time, the inner planets will all be lined up on one side of the sun with the exception of the Earth which will be directly at the opposite side.
The increased gravitational effects of the sun combined with the added pull from the other planets will have a devastating effect on the earth.
At this time, all major fault lines will rupture. California will experience the big one at this time.
Volcanic activity will increase and it is very likely that the Long Valley Caulderra will explode cataclysmicly. These types of events will be occurring at roughly the same time throughout the entire planet.
To top it off, the suns corona will be nudged away from the earth...towards the grouped inner planets, effectively creating a massive coronal hole (I.E." the "three days of darkness").
When the pull of the alignment comes to pass, the corona will snap back to the earth facing side thereby releasing a CME of massive proportions....aimed directly at planet Earth.
Believe me, there will be terror at this time.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Danny moves "The Great Kahn of Terror" by yet another 7 months:
On Mon, 19 Jun 2000 19:59:25 -0500, No User wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, (BobO fficer) wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jun 2000 12:37:04 -0500, to alt.astrology et al I wrote
Enjoy 1999 seventh month. It is Ethanim 2000.
you said it was last September or October,
Yes, the seventh month 1999 in the revised Roman calendar was from sunset September 10th to sunset October 10th but the first month 1999 was in the spring of 1762 BC, sunset Saturday March 24th to sunset April 22nd proleptic Julian. The seventh month Ethanim was therefore 2000, not of 1999 but FROM the first month in the YEAR 1999 of the passover. Hence, the YEAR 1999 seventh month AND seven months. See?
I let you take every day of the year 1999
The LORD granted the centuries and you did not repent. He giveth and He taketh away. You Robert, speak blasphemy of the LORD.
and you were wrong.
I am corrected by scripture--and Nostradamus was likewise.
there was no terror from the skies, no killer asteroid.
And yet again must that universal ruler of infernal hades be raised up as it is written. Beware the star in fortune opposing, in the rule of night from heaven it advances to WINNOW, "Whose fan is in his hand, and he will thoroughly purge his floor, and gather his wheat into the garner but the chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire" [Mat 3:12]
Daniel
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Expects half the world's population destroyed in October 2000
On Sun, 2 Jul 2000 23:00:02 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jul 2000, "Douglas Deaton" wrote:
I am new here and somewhat ignorant.
Doug
That makes two of us, or 6 billion of us if I'm not entirely mistaken.
At October much will be made clear
by ways and means of the elements.
I expect half the population gone,
global equalisation of temperature
and pressure, the time, a new race,
His perpetual age the moment where,
or at the place when, smoke clears.
Enjoy the fireworks!
Daniel Joseph Min- >
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel predicts the US presidential election for 2000
On 12 Nov 2000 23:44:00 -0000, Daniel Joseph Min wrote:
The 42nd President of the United States is the very
last of all the American Presidents to hold office.
He will announce our *National Emergency* shortly,
thus will continue in the office of the President,
having already been inaugurated in due diligence
when he was elected President. Gore is still VP.
&There is no reason to repeal the 22nd amendment,
given that Mr. President William Jefferson Clinton
has been elected twice only, and no more, thus the
amendment does not apply. Neither does a term limit
apply in his case, given that this is indeed a true
state of emergency with bloody violence seen to be
escalating in the State of Florida and elsewhere,
spreading like wildfire as it is in the mid east.
Get to higher ground if you can (look at England!)
Daniel Joseph Min
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So what should you do about him?
Well, first of all, you can be pretty sure based on his success rate that anything he has to say is wrong.
Someone once said, rather well, that "there is too much Min, and not enough Nostradamus" in what he posts.
Complaining won't do much, because he's they type of individual that doesn't feel the need to explain himself.
Asking him to stop only feeds him.
complaining to his anonymous remailer service results in nothing.
About the best thing to be said, is just be aware of what a buffoon he is.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
