In light of Lemesurier's departure... More of the *facts* that chased him
away...
Just a question of time for this one to be fulfilled. Maybe tomorrow, maybe
next month, maybe next year....BUT THIS IS NEXT. Observe how the prophecies
are used to *predict* the future before it happens...
SEA OF SIN:
Century X, Quatrain 49
Iardin du monde aupres de cité neufue,
Dans le chemin des montaignes cauees:
Sera saisi & plongé dans la Cuve,
Beuuant par force eaux soulphre enuenimees.
Garden of the world near the new city,
In the path of the HOLLOW MOUNTAINS:
It will be seized and plunged into the Tub,
Forced to drink waters poisoned by sulfur.
"Jardin du monde" = Garden of Eden or
"Hanging Gardens of Babylon," which are
both located in Iraq.
"Cite neufue" = New York City.
(i.e., Iraq near New York City).
Which implies that Iraq is somehow
involved in the September 11 attacks. The
"hollow mountains" links time, place, and
action of the prophecy. The "hollow
mountains" is Nostradamus' description
of the two skyscrapers of the WTC.
"In the path of the hollow mountains"
means what comes after the WTC
destruction.
Seized and plunged in the "Cuue"
(i.e., in Renaissance French, a fermentation
cauldron used for mixing chemicals,
poisons, etc) is a reference to the seizures
and drowning effects of a
chemical/biological attack and/or modern day plague.
Notice "Cuue" is capitalized in the original quatrain
(SEE ABOVE) to show that this is the most
important element in the quatrain.
The poisoning of the water mentioned here
is of an entirely different nature, as boiling
the water or bottled water--if it were meant
literally--could eliminate the poison.
But this poisoning is far more serious as it
cannot be avoided (i.e., forced to drink).
The drowning effects of pulmonary
anthrax or some other chemical/biological
poison is implied.
Sulfur is a symbolic reference to brimstone
(i.e., The Wrath of God). Water is the way
God destroys man during the "Flood."
This quatrain is linked to X, 72 & II, 89 + others.
.
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: SEA OF SIN - X, 49 |
03 Nov 2003 11:45:59 AM |
|
|
"DHM" <DHM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dllpb.29095$of7.702628@wagner.videotron.net...
Just a question of time for this one to be fulfilled. Maybe tomorrow,
maybe
next month, maybe next year....BUT THIS IS NEXT. Observe how the
prophecies
are used to *predict* the future before it happens...
"Maybe" this or "maybe" that, one day this means bio warfare, then next
it means SAR's, you don't have a clue do you? you're getting as bad as the
soiled leg morons for all your changes and veiled references.
You're just another clueless liar DiM.
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "DHM" |
|
| Title: Re: SEA OF SIN - X, 49 |
03 Nov 2003 02:32:31 PM |
|
|
Do you want the exact date when this will happen?..It is not found in the
prophecies.
Only X.72 is dated for our time - THE SPACE AGE in 1999.
X.49 deals with either poison or plague, nothing else. We shall see which...
Stick around, you may actually learn something real yet...
"Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote in message
news:ovwpb.1767$3h5.13827@newsfep4-glfd.server.ntli.net...
"DHM" <DHM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dllpb.29095$of7.702628@wagner.videotron.net...
Just a question of time for this one to be fulfilled. Maybe tomorrow,
maybe
next month, maybe next year....BUT THIS IS NEXT. Observe how the
prophecies
are used to *predict* the future before it happens...
"Maybe" this or "maybe" that, one day this means bio warfare, then next
it means SAR's, you don't have a clue do you? you're getting as bad as the
soiled leg morons for all your changes and veiled references.
You're just another clueless liar DiM.
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: SEA OF SIN - X, 49 |
04 Nov 2003 07:26:57 AM |
|
|
"DHM" <DHM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:BXypb.39394$of7.946930@wagner.videotron.net...
Do you want the exact date when this will happen?..It is not found in the
prophecies.
Depends who's reading them doesn't it? it appears that for some
every quatrain points to a specific date or event. For you just
the mention of a single date is enough to have you twisting anything
likely to fit.
Only X.72 is dated for our time - THE SPACE AGE in 1999.
The 'space age' is just that, it does not point to a specific year or else
it would be called 'the space year'. Your feeble attempts to link the
year 1999 are comical but that is all.
X.49 deals with either poison or plague, nothing else. We shall see
which...
Yeah I noticed you keep changing your mind, just after SAR's became
public headlines you leapt on the bandwagon proclaiming that this
quatrain was definitely linked with it and millions would die, what happened
to them DiM? just another empty fairy tale from you.
Stick around, you may actually learn something real yet...
Not from a moron like you.
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sinned" |
|
| Title: Re: SEA OF SIN - X, 49 |
04 Nov 2003 02:45:07 PM |
|
|
"Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote in message news:<yONpb.2396$382.2053@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net>...
"DHM" <DHM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
Only X.72 is dated for our time - THE SPACE AGE in 1999.
The 'space age' is just that, it does not point to a specific year or else
it would be called 'the space year'. Your feeble attempts to link the
year 1999 are comical but that is all.
Comical? Virtually every movie or book on Nostradamus claims he
predicted the SPACE AGE. I HAVE SHOWN THAT WHY THAT IS.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: SEA OF SIN - X, 49 |
04 Nov 2003 02:58:47 PM |
|
|
"Sinned" <drmabusa@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:18753eda.0311041245.682dddae@posting.google.com...
Comical? Virtually every movie or book on Nostradamus claims he
predicted the SPACE AGE. I HAVE SHOWN THAT WHY THAT IS.
So not only do you get your pathetic ideas from other people's work
you're so stupid as to believe that a movie is real? you're even
dumber than your idiotic posts make you look.
You have never been able to show any evidence for your
miserable bleating, it's nothing but the opinion of a simple
minded kid with an over inflated ego.
--
krib
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Wally Anglesea™" |
|
| Title: Re: SEA OF SIN - X, 49 |
04 Nov 2003 03:09:49 PM |
|
|
On 4 Nov 2003 12:45:07 -0800, (Sinned) wrote:
"Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote in message news:<yONpb.2396$382.2053@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net>...
"DHM" <DHM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
Only X.72 is dated for our time - THE SPACE AGE in 1999.
The 'space age' is just that, it does not point to a specific year or else
it would be called 'the space year'. Your feeble attempts to link the
year 1999 are comical but that is all.
Comical? Virtually every movie or book on Nostradamus claims he
predicted the SPACE AGE. I HAVE SHOWN THAT WHY THAT IS.
And I, and others have shown why you are an idiot for claiming so.
--
"FOR I HAVE BECOME VENGEANCE AND YOU WILL FEEL THE WRATH"
"YOUR DOOM IS WRITTEN IN THE STARS...."
"THE DREADED NAME HAS BEEN REVEALED...YOUR DOOM IS NEAR..."
DM in meltdown mode, February 2003
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Leigh_Bee" |
|
| Title: Re: SEA OF SIN - X, 49 |
05 Nov 2003 03:46:02 AM |
|
|
"DHM" <DHM@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<BXypb.39394$of7.946930@wagner.videotron.net>...
Do you want the exact date when this will happen?..It is not found in the
prophecies.
Only X.72 is dated for our time - THE SPACE AGE in 1999.
Not as it is written it says nothing of any space age it is about 2
kings.
X.49 deals with either poison or plague, nothing else. We shall see which...
Is this where you get your take on this one: E Cheatham
Three Mile Island. 1979
This is a fascinating quatrain containing the idea of a water supply
being poisoned. The cite neufve is New York, as usual. Harrisburg,
Pennsylvania, where the disastrous leak of nuclear water occurred in
1979 is only 180 miles away, 'The garden of the world near New City'.
The road of hollow mountains is interesting. Could that be the nearest
Nostradamus could get to describing a city of skyscrapers? The tank is
obviously the poisoned water at Harrisburg. See 187, IX92.
Stick around, you may actually learn something real yet...
Oh yes "one eyed and myopic and in the dark".
LB
.
|
|
|
| User: "DHM" |
|
| Title: Re: SEA OF SIN - X, 49 |
05 Nov 2003 05:34:07 AM |
|
|
"Leigh_Bee" <leigh8bee@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:39cd5fe.0311050146.75cee53d@posting.google.com...
"DHM" <DHM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<BXypb.39394$of7.946930@wagner.videotron.net>...
Do you want the exact date when this will happen?..It is not found in
the
prophecies.
Only X.72 is dated for our time - THE SPACE AGE in 1999.
Not as it is written it says nothing of any space age it is about 2
kings.
Little do you know that we live in the SPACE AGE. Any prophecy dealing with
the year 1999 would have to reveal the AGE OF CIVILIZATION.
And I would like to know how your Paki Paymaster fits? But your
interpretations are purely subjective having nothing to do with objective
historical reality...
Show us the next quatrain to be fulfilled and we'll see what happens...Take
the challenge, girl?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Leigh_Bee" |
|
| Title: Re: SEA OF SIN - X, 49 |
05 Nov 2003 04:33:30 PM |
|
|
"DHM" <DHM@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<Te5qb.80635$Gn2.2054987@weber.videotron.net>...
"Leigh_Bee" <leigh8bee@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:39cd5fe.0311050146.75cee53d@posting.google.com...
"DHM" <DHM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<BXypb.39394$of7.946930@wagner.videotron.net>...
Do you want the exact date when this will happen?..It is not found in
the
prophecies.
Only X.72 is dated for our time - THE SPACE AGE in 1999.
Not as it is written it says nothing of any space age it is about 2
kings.
Little do you know that we live in the SPACE AGE. Any prophecy dealing with
the year 1999 would have to reveal the AGE OF CIVILIZATION.
But only a person living then would know the Space Age finished in
1980's we have not really progressed from that point, but we now live
in the Virtual/nano age, and near space is going to be a military zone
And I would like to know how your Paki Paymaster fits?
He fits the Quatrain of CXQ72 in 1)1999 the year he assumed power 2)
he assumed power whilst still airborne hence from the skies or
heavens.
3) he has had a chequered military career "before Mars",
4) he is in a position to weild enormous power
5) He has yet to become hostile in regards to a hostile default
6) He has not yet gone across Asia and Europe to bring out the French
Bloodline in opposition.
But your
interpretations are purely subjective having nothing to do with objective
historical reality...
Your claim, though I would love to know your thoughts on your own
efforts!
Show us the next quatrain to be fulfilled and we'll see what happens...Take
the challenge, girl?
That is easy C3Q61 and C8Q70 my Iraq and Saddam take!
Come on sonny show us yours.
LB
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sinned" |
|
| Title: Re: SEA OF SIN - X, 49 |
07 Nov 2003 10:28:22 PM |
|
|
(Leigh_Bee) wrote in message news:<39cd5fe.0311051433.4a88b3e5@posting.google.com>...
"DHM" <DHM@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<Te5qb.80635$Gn2.2054987@weber.videotron.net>...
"Leigh_Bee" < > wrote in message
news:39cd5fe.0311050146.75cee53d@posting.google.com...
"DHM" <DHM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<BXypb.39394$of7.946930@wagner.videotron.net>...
Do you want the exact date when this will happen?..It is not found in
the
prophecies.
Only X.72 is dated for our time - THE SPACE AGE in 1999.
Not as it is written it says nothing of any space age it is about 2
kings.
Little do you know that we live in the SPACE AGE. Any prophecy dealing with
the year 1999 would have to reveal the AGE OF CIVILIZATION.
But only a person living then would know the Space Age finished in
1980's we have not really progressed from that point, but we now live
in the Virtual/nano age, and near space is going to be a military zone
That is your SUBJECTIVE opinion. Can you see the difference between
historical reality and speculation?
And I would like to know how your Paki Paymaster fits?
He fits the Quatrain of CXQ72 in 1)1999 the year he assumed power
THAT IS YOUR ONLY *FACT* AND IT AIN'T MUCH
2) he assumed power whilst still airborne hence from the skies or
heavens.
An attempt to reduce the metaphysical to the mundane.
3) he has had a chequered military career "before Mars",
Nothing unique or original to this.
4) he is in a position to weild enormous power
What about the other King then?
Yours is an attempt to find *something* in 1999 and fit it in the
quatrain.
Trouble is what you find is neither unique nor interesting. What a
waste of time prophecy would be if it dealt with such generalized and
vague things as what you mention. You miss the pinpoint specificity
found in X.72.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: SEA OF SIN - X, 49 |
08 Nov 2003 01:33:55 AM |
|
|
"Sinned" <drmabusa@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:18753eda.0311072028.77d50d99@posting.google.com...
That is your SUBJECTIVE opinion. Can you see the difference between
historical reality and speculation?
Can you? it appears not, nor do you see the irony in your post.
THAT IS YOUR ONLY *FACT* AND IT AIN'T MUCH
But at least he is consistent, whereas you switch your stories
whenever facts prove you wrong.
An attempt to reduce the metaphysical to the mundane.
The opposite of your fairy tales. Quite appropriate isn't it?
Yours is an attempt to find *something* in 1999 and fit it in the
quatrain.
Like your childish attempts to call 1999 the "SPACE AGE" you mean?
Trouble is what you find is neither unique nor interesting. What a
waste of time prophecy would be if it dealt with such generalized and
vague things as what you mention. You miss the pinpoint specificity
found in X.72.
And you offer nothing but your ever changing opinion. You've been proved
wrong time after time.
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sinned" |
|
| Title: Re: SEA OF SIN - X, 49 |
08 Nov 2003 12:05:26 PM |
|
|
"Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote in message news:<v%0rb.41$Tc2.324@newsfep4-glfd.server.ntli.net>...
Like your childish attempts to call 1999 the "SPACE AGE" you mean?
The period post 1945+ is the SPACE AGE....1999 is part of that
period....
Space age technology
The years since World War II ended have been spent in the shadow of
nuclear weapons, even though they have not been used in war since that
time. These weapons have undergone momentous development: the fission
bombs of 1945 were superseded by the more powerful fusion bombs in
1950, and before 1960 rockets were shown capable of delivering these
weapons at ranges of thousands of miles. This new military technology
has had an incalculable effect on international relations, for it has
contributed to the polarization of world power blocs while enforcing a
caution, if not discipline, in the conduct of international affairs
that was absent earlier in the 20th century.
The fact of nuclear power has been by no means the only technological
novelty of the post-1945 years. So striking, indeed, have been the
advances in engineering, chemical and medical technology, transport,
and communications, that some commentators have written, somewhat
misleadingly, of the "second Industrial Revolution" in describing the
changes in these years. The rapid development of electronic
engineering has created a new world of computer technology, remote
control, miniaturization, and instant communication. Even more
expressive of the character of the period has been the leap over the
threshold of extraterrestrial exploration. The techniques of rocketry,
first applied in weapons, were developed to provide launch vehicles
for satellites and lunar and planetary probes and eventually, in 1969,
to set the first men on the Moon and to bring them home safely again.
This astonishing achievement was stimulated in part by the
international ideological rivalry already mentioned, as only the
Soviet Union and the United States had both the resources and the will
to support the huge expenditures required. It justifies the
description of this period, however, as that of "space age
technology."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: SEA OF SIN - X, 49 |
08 Nov 2003 02:15:06 PM |
|
|
"Sinned" <drmabusa@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:18753eda.0311081005.5a3f16d4@posting.google.com...
The period post 1945+ is the SPACE AGE....1999 is part of that
period....
As is the near future, including the current crop of Mars probes,
yet when this is pointed out you insist only 1999 is relevant to the
space age which is, of course, *****.
The rest of your quotation showed a lucidity and understanding
you have never come close to. Tell me again about how all spacecraft
are manned from earth?
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sinned" |
|
| Title: Re: SEA OF SIN - X, 49 |
08 Nov 2003 09:23:36 PM |
|
|
Actually, the prophecy deals with the KING OF TERROR. The SPACE AGE is
merely the background to his emergence...
"Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote in message news:<d9crb.415$gS4.319@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net>...
"Sinned" <drmabusa@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:18753eda.0311081005.5a3f16d4@posting.google.com...
The period post 1945+ is the SPACE AGE....1999 is part of that
period....
As is the near future, including the current crop of Mars probes,
yet when this is pointed out you insist only 1999 is relevant to the
space age which is, of course, *****.
The rest of your quotation showed a lucidity and understanding
you have never come close to. Tell me again about how all spacecraft
are manned from earth?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: SEA OF SIN - X, 49 |
09 Nov 2003 04:38:59 AM |
|
|
"Sinned" <drmabusa@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:18753eda.0311081923.177262c0@posting.google.com...
Actually, the prophecy deals with the KING OF TERROR. The SPACE AGE is
merely the background to his emergence...
Which, you insist, is in 1999 even though the "SPACE AGE" is not
a single year at all. So once again you shift emphasis in a feeble
attempt to divert attention from just how wrong you are.
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sinned" |
|
| Title: Re: SEA OF SIN - X, 49 |
09 Nov 2003 11:07:09 AM |
|
|
See how significant this prophecy is? But you would like to make it
meaningless. You failed...
"Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote in message news:<7Porb.971$Tc2.6398@newsfep4-glfd.server.ntli.net>...
"Sinned" <drmabusa@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:18753eda.0311081923.177262c0@posting.google.com...
Actually, the prophecy deals with the KING OF TERROR. The SPACE AGE is
merely the background to his emergence...
Which, you insist, is in 1999 even though the "SPACE AGE" is not
a single year at all. So once again you shift emphasis in a feeble
attempt to divert attention from just how wrong you are.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: SEA OF SIN - X, 49 |
10 Nov 2003 02:52:33 AM |
|
|
"Sinned" <drmabusa@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:18753eda.0311090907.71399799@posting.google.com...
See how significant this prophecy is?
To you, yes, everyone who reads your garbage understands
that to you it is significant despite your constant changes and
shifts of emphasis.
But you would like to make it meaningless.
Wrong again DiMmy, my issue is not with the quatrain it is with
your childish interpretations, *they* are meaningless.
You failed...
Obviously not, but you never let facts get in your way do you?
--
krib
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sinned" |
|
| Title: Re: SEA OF SIN - X, 49 |
10 Nov 2003 09:22:26 PM |
|
|
So why don't you tell us how significiant this prophecy?
Thought you could not answer. But you have always been a liar and
fraud, Lemesurier/Britton, no matter what name you choose...
I am so glad that there is a dated prophecy for OUR TIME to smash you
over the head with...bwahaha
"Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote in message news:<klIrb.1670$Tc2.12015@newsfep4-glfd.server.ntli.net>...
"Sinned" <drmabusa@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:18753eda.0311090907.71399799@posting.google.com...
See how significant this prophecy is?
To you, yes, everyone who reads your garbage understands
that to you it is significant despite your constant changes and
shifts of emphasis.
But you would like to make it meaningless.
Wrong again DiMmy, my issue is not with the quatrain it is with
your childish interpretations, *they* are meaningless.
You failed...
Obviously not, but you never let facts get in your way do you?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: SEA OF SIN - X, 49 |
11 Nov 2003 07:19:14 AM |
|
|
"Sinned" <drmabusa@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:18753eda.0311101922.19b8e8e8@posting.google.com...
So why don't you tell us how significiant this prophecy?
You're the one claiming that it is significant and you're the one
constantly being proved wrong before you change emphasis or switch
to yet another version of events, the burden of proof is on you and
you failed sonny.
Thought you could not answer. But you have always been a liar and
fraud, Lemesurier/Britton, no matter what name you choose...
Answered above. Incidentally, speaking of being a liar, why are you
still here? remember you agreed to leave when you failed to prove I
am Peter L? (and boy did you fail again, big time). Remember how
you lied by pretending to phone his ISP and pretending to get
personal details from them? so why are you still here? do you think
that your pretending I am PL gives you the excuse you so desparately
need?
I am so glad that there is a dated prophecy for OUR TIME to smash you
over the head with...bwahaha
You go in for this childish rhetoric a lot don't you? all of the "smashed,
destroyed, crushed" etc etc says everything anyone needs to know about
you DiMmy, you're an ineffectual big mouthed know nothing kid.
That's how "smashed" I am, you moron ;0)
--
krib
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Leigh_Bee" |
|
| Title: Re: SEA OF SIN - X, 49 |
11 Nov 2003 04:41:02 PM |
|
|
(Sinned) wrote in message news:<18753eda.0311101922.19b8e8e8@posting.google.com>...
So why don't you tell us how significiant this prophecy?
Sinny be a dear and explain the Sea of Sin for me, please.
LB
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Wally Anglesea™" |
|
| Title: Re: SEA OF SIN - X, 49 |
11 Nov 2003 06:02:34 AM |
|
|
On 10 Nov 2003 19:22:26 -0800, (Sinned) wrote:
So why don't you tell us how significiant this prophecy?
Thought you could not answer. But you have always been a liar and
fraud, Lemesurier/Britton, no matter what name you choose...
I am so glad that there is a dated prophecy for OUR TIME to smash you
over the head with...bwahaha
This overcompensation for your inadequacy complex shows up quite well
in your language, Dennis. Have you sought help for this?
--
"FOR I HAVE BECOME VENGEANCE AND YOU WILL FEEL THE WRATH"
"YOUR DOOM IS WRITTEN IN THE STARS...."
"THE DREADED NAME HAS BEEN REVEALED...YOUR DOOM IS NEAR..."
DM in meltdown mode, February 2003
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Never anonymous Bud" |
|
| Title: Re: SEA OF SIN - X, 49 |
09 Nov 2003 02:35:43 PM |
|
|
Having skipped an E.L.F. meeting to be here, (Sinned)
scribbled:
See how significant this prophecy is?
If you REALLY understood what Nostradamus wrote, you wouldn't say that.
To reply by email, remove the XYZ.
Lumber Cartel (tinlc) #2063. Spam this account at your own risk.
It's your SIG, say what you want to say....
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Never anonymous Bud" |
|
| Title: Re: SEA OF SIN - X, 49 |
08 Nov 2003 09:56:29 PM |
|
|
Having skipped an E.L.F. meeting to be here, (Sinned)
scribbled:
Actually, the prophecy deals with the KING OF TERROR.
NO, it doesn't.
You'll NEVER understand Nostradamus if you start with a bad translation.
To reply by email, remove the XYZ.
Lumber Cartel (tinlc) #2063. Spam this account at your own risk.
It's your SIG, say what you want to say....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Claude Latremouille" |
|
| Title: Re: SEA OF SIN - X, 49 |
09 Nov 2003 07:36:37 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 03:56:29 GMT, back from Hell where he met many
former a.p.n. posters, Never anonymous Bud <thekat@san.rr.com> wrote
in part:
*
You'll NEVER understand Nostradamus if you start with a bad translation.
*
And we ALL know how much experience you have in the matter, eh?!
*
For recent lurkers, NOSTRADAMUS DID NOT WRITE IN ENGLISH.
*
To translate a text, a translator needs to understand it. As
Nostradamus' texts are too obscure to be understood, they cannot
be translated, much to the chagrin of the Anglo-Saxon crowd and
the dismay of professional translators.
*
Which means that Nostradamus' texts ought to be quoted *as is*
(thanks to Mario Gregorio's site, they can be looked at as they
were printed) and commented in English, the common language of
this NewsGroup.
*
That way, the discussion will be about what Nostradamus wrote,
not about what a well-meaning translator says he wrote.
*
Happy 500th, Nosty!
*
Claude Latrémouille
*
=== ===
=== CLAUDE LATRÉMOUILLE ===
===========================
--
*** ** ***
C L A U D E L A T R E M O U I L L E
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
|
|
|
| User: "Never anonymous Bud" |
|
| Title: Re: SEA OF SIN - X, 49 |
09 Nov 2003 09:50:53 AM |
|
|
Having skipped an E.L.F. meeting to be here, (Claude
Latremouille) scribbled:
On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 03:56:29 GMT, back from Hell where he met many
former a.p.n. posters, Never anonymous Bud <thekat@san.rr.com> wrote
in part:
*
You'll NEVER understand Nostradamus if you start with a bad translation.
*
And we ALL know how much experience you have in the matter, eh?!
At least *I* read the words as written, instead of playing Scrabble with them!
To reply by email, remove the XYZ.
Lumber Cartel (tinlc) #2063. Spam this account at your own risk.
It's your SIG, say what you want to say....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Claude Latremouille" |
|
| Title: Re: SEA OF SIN - X, 49 |
09 Nov 2003 05:39:06 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 15:50:53 GMT, Never anonymous Bud <thekat@san.rr.com>
wrote:
*
At least *I* read the words as written, instead of playing Scrabble with
them!
*
Hmmm, we have established many years ago and to our mutual
satisfaction that you *can't* read the words as written. You read
texts written by others, texts which they hope you will accept as
coming from Nostradamus. This is worse than playing Scrabble(R)
with the originals.
*
As to playing Scrabble with each line of text published by
Nostradamus, this is made necessary by the very nature of these
lines of text; each of them is meaningful gobbledygook (which the
alleged 'translations' you read conveniently eliminate, thereby
preventing you from seeing it) and this meaningful gobbledygook
becomes a Prophecy written in perfect French, a Prophecy about
the circumstances of the unintended destruction of Paris on
Sunday, August 13, 2017, at 3:53 a.m.
*
This is why Nostradamus wrote his Prophecies. His published poems
are *never* understood before the fact; therefore, they are
perfectly useless. Only that decyphered text is understood before
the fact. The use of that decyphered text? To warn the good
people of Paris about the above.
*
You disagree? Fine. You like to repeat hundreds of times here
that you disagree? You are wasting your time, as my job is to
show what I have found, not winning a popularity contest.
*
As this thread concerns X-49, let's have it and two of its
decyphered versions (if you can read the original poetry, you can
also read the decyphered prose):
*
-------------- C E N T V R I E___D I X I E S M E. ------------
------------------ (édition prétendue de 1568) ---------------
*
--------------------------- X L I X. -------------------------
--------- Iardin du monde au pres de cité neufue, ------------
--------- Dans le chemin des montaignes cauees, --------------
--------- Sera saisi & plongé dans la Cuue, ------------------
--------- Beuuant par force eaux soulfre enuenimees. ---------
*
And the first decyphered version, about our recent past:
*
--------------------------- X L I X. -------------------------
--------- Après la tuerie immonde dicte du Neuf --------------
--------- Onze de l'Année MMI dans les Estats Unis, ----------
--------- l'US sera saisi de rage, car il --------------------
--------- aura eu l'Enfer d'une grosse Exécution Arabe. ------
*
And a version about our future:
*
--------------------------- X L I X. -------------------------
--------- Quand Paris meurt de son bien fidèle ---------------
--------- et cher Amy en Aoust l'Année Deux Mil Dix ----------
--------- Sept, l'Oracle en anagrame dessus ------------------
--------- une bombe lancée sur Paris sera enfin exact. -------
*
This version is the useful one, as it seeks to save 3,000,000
lives.
*
Happy 500th, Nosty!
*
Claude Latrémouille
*
=== ===
=== CLAUDE LATRÉMOUILLE ===
===========================
--
*** ** ***
C L A U D E L A T R E M O U I L L E
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
|
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: SEA OF SIN - X, 49 |
10 Nov 2003 02:57:14 AM |
|
|
"Claude Latremouille" <cj559@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote in message
news:bomj6q$i$1@freenet9.carleton.ca...
This version is the useful one, as it seeks to save 3,000,000
lives.
Only in your delusion claude. You still haven't explained
why it is your anagrams *only* work after the fact? why
are you able to show tremendous minutae of past events
yet cannot do the same for the event *you* say they are
all about, why is that claude?
Could it be that knowing what you are looking for i.e. past
events, people, locations etc gives you the soultion for the
way you play with the letters? not knowing the future, of
course, prevents you from *finding* anything but generalities?
You call yourself logical but can't see the obvious flaw in *your*
anagrams claude?
--
krib
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Never anonymous Bud" |
|
| Title: Re: SEA OF SIN - X, 49 |
10 Nov 2003 05:22:47 AM |
|
|
Having skipped an E.L.F. meeting to be here, (Claude
Latremouille) scribbled:
On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 15:50:53 GMT, Never anonymous Bud <thekat@san.rr.com>
wrote:
*
At least *I* read the words as written, instead of playing Scrabble with
them!
*
Hmmm, we have established many years ago and to our mutual
satisfaction that you *can't* read the words as written.
No, YOU came to that conclusion by yourself, with NO evidence.
But you think that of everyone but yourself, so I wasn't really
overwhelmed by your admiration.
To reply by email, remove the XYZ.
Lumber Cartel (tinlc) #2063. Spam this account at your own risk.
It's your SIG, say what you want to say....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Leigh_Bee" |
|
| Title: Re: SEA OF SIN - X, 49 |
10 Nov 2003 04:24:46 PM |
|
|
Never anonymous Bud <thekat@san.rxyzr.com> wrote in message news:<c6tuqvkmtn7pcp15sqpsesuu8fk98avj10@4ax.com>...
Having skipped an E.L.F. meeting to be here, (Claude
Latremouille) scribbled:
On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 15:50:53 GMT, Never anonymous Bud <thekat@san.rr.com>
wrote:
*
At least *I* read the words as written, instead of playing Scrabble with
them!
*
Hmmm, we have established many years ago and to our mutual
satisfaction that you *can't* read the words as written.
No, YOU came to that conclusion by yourself, with NO evidence.
But you think that of everyone but yourself, so I wasn't really
overwhelmed by your admiration.
The paradox is if you believe him you are a genius, if not well
apparently you have no clue!
Funny Claude has not taken his findings to France, I wonder why?
A danger to shipping no doubt
Is there a cell for him there?
The Canuk surgeon of Crowthorne.
LB
He is not the Messiah, but he has seen a few movies on the subject.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Claude Latremouille" |
|
| Title: About Southern Hemispheric Brainwaves |
11 Nov 2003 11:09:00 AM |
|
|
On 10 Nov 2003 14:24:46 -0800, (Leigh_Bee)
wrote in part:
*
Funny Claude has not taken his findings to France, I wonder why?
*
Hmmm, they seem to have an electronic wall blocking the Internet
and preventing them from accessing various NewsGroups, MailLists,
and other modern methods for exchanging ideas.
*
Unless, of course, there is a different wall, passing through
Southern California, and including the Southern Hemisphere, which
actually prevents brain waves from travelling farther than the
distance between the tip of one's nose and the computer screen.
*
Which would explain why, during years of posting to this
NewsGroup, not a single one of them has reached the North.
*
Hey! 'North'. Did you know that 'North' is the only English word
Nostradamus has used in his entire opus? AND, he was not writing
in English. I wonder why he did it... Maybe his poems are nothing
but meaningful gobbledygook hiding the real text of his Prophecy?
*
Naaah! Much too smart of a dead guy. Besides, if his published
poems WERE encyphered, that would mean that it would be
ridiculous to translate them into English, right? That in turn
would mean that foreigners would be unable to read them, right?
*
Exactly. As Nostradamus says somewhere in Latin -- pardon my
French -- his prophecies ARE NOT for... « les morveux, les
astrologues et les étrangers ».
*
Seems that the following fall into one or more of the above
categories:
*
<> (Leigh_Bee)
<thekat@san.rr.com> (Never anonymous Bud)
<gary@somai.fsworld.co.uk> (Gary Somai)
*
Have I forgotten anyone? Ah, yes. That 'North' business. It is
found in... II-17? Funny, it bears the number 16. I wonder why.
Could it be that Nostradamus left us some clues to the hidden
prophecy about Paris?
*
C E N T V R I E___S E C O N D E.
(édition de 1555)
*
16 Le camp du temple de la vierge vestale,
Non esloigné d'Ethne & monts Pyrenées:
Le grand conduict est caché dens la male
North.getés fluues & vignes mastinées.
*
See? One poor little English word left alone in a sea of
gobbledygook. And the number 16? Well, if you look at the book
(and Mario Gregorio's website allows you to look at the book),
you can see a very odd thing about quatrain numbers in Centurie
II... that's right, folks, there is no quatrain 17.
*
Now, 17... what does this remind me of? Ah, yes, the year of the
unintended destruction of Paris by the US military. How was
Nostradamus able to achieve this disappearing act? Simple really.
He ordered his printers to print a second quatrain numbered II-12
at the top of one page, after the first II-12, and then, all the
others on the same page follow that pattern, the last one being
numbered 16.
*
Which means that quatrain 13 is the first one to have been
misnumbered. Now 13... what does this remind me of? Ah, yes, the
day of the unintended destruction of Paris by the US military.
But how do we know that this is not a very simple printing error
committed by Nostradamus' incompetent printers?
*
Do you know how we know? Hey, brainwaves! Do you know how we
know? Hey, Aussie Moron! Do you know how we know?
*
Answer: We know that the printers *knew* that they had made a
misprint, as they made sure that the next quatrain, after the
misnumbered II-16, would bear the number... 18!
*
So, in Centurie II (2, for the first digit of the millenium
starting in year 2001), Nostradamus wanted to screw-up quatrain
13's number (for August 13) and wanted to leave out a quatrain 17
(for August 13, 2017).
*
And the time? He only printed 353 quatrains in that same book, so
as to make sure that the time of the destruction of Paris, 3:53
a.m., be recorded in that fashion, just as the bunch of ducats
and double ducats in his last will and testament amount to 353.
*
That's why he did not want morons to come close to his prophecy.
*
Happy 500th, Nosty!
*
Claude Latrémouille
*
=== ===
=== CLAUDE LATRÉMOUILLE ===
===========================
--
*** ** ***
C L A U D E L A T R E M O U I L L E
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
