The US military has admitted killing six more children in a bomb attack in
eastern Afghanistan over the weekend. The US said the bodies of six children
and two adults were found on Saturday following air strikes against a
compound east of Gardez, in Paktia province, the previous day. Officials
said they suspected that Taliban leader Mullah Jilani was in the compound at
the time. On Sunday, the US military admitted that a bomb attack in
neighbouring Ghazni province on Saturday killed nine children and two
adults. The US insisted that the target of the attack, Taliban leader Mullah
Wazir, was killed in the strike, but local residents said he wasn't even in
the area at the time.
.
|
|
| User: "Mark Tyme" |
|
| Title: Re: Seppocide in Afghanistan, (again)! |
10 Dec 2003 08:54:18 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:20:12 +0100, "WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote:
The US military has admitted killing six more children in a bomb attack in
eastern Afghanistan over the weekend. The US said the bodies of six children
and two adults were found on Saturday following air strikes against a
compound east of Gardez, in Paktia province, the previous day. Officials
said they suspected that Taliban leader Mullah Jilani was in the compound at
the time. On Sunday, the US military admitted that a bomb attack in
neighbouring Ghazni province on Saturday killed nine children and two
adults. The US insisted that the target of the attack, Taliban leader Mullah
Wazir, was killed in the strike, but local residents said he wasn't even in
the area at the time.
Looks like the Nazis (i.e. Neocons) occupying Afghanistan had some
more "Steering" Problems.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anon Ymous" |
|
| Title: Re: Seppocide in Afghanistan, (again)! |
10 Dec 2003 02:12:45 PM |
|
|
Mark Tyme <MarkTyme@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:<ircetvoqu9mksan0a5u3c9e6ghkpnkf87q@4ax.com>...
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:20:12 +0100, "WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote:
The US military has admitted killing six more children in a bomb attack in
eastern Afghanistan over the weekend. The US said the bodies of six children
and two adults were found on Saturday following air strikes against a
compound east of Gardez, in Paktia province, the previous day. Officials
said they suspected that Taliban leader Mullah Jilani was in the compound at
the time. On Sunday, the US military admitted that a bomb attack in
neighbouring Ghazni province on Saturday killed nine children and two
adults. The US insisted that the target of the attack, Taliban leader Mullah
Wazir, was killed in the strike, but local residents said he wasn't even in
the area at the time.
Looks like the Nazis (i.e. Neocons) occupying Afghanistan had some
more "Steering" Problems.
Wow, six kids...that's awful. I feel really bad for those kids--as
any American would. We have consciences here.
However, as of August 16, 2002, a total of 2,726 death certificates
related to the WTC attacks had been filed. Of these 2,726 decedents,
2,103 (77%) were males and 623 (23%) were females. The median age for
these decedents was 39 years (range: 2--85 years).
You two do understand, I'm sure, that the U.S. had no interest
whatsoever in Afghanistan until shortly after the WTC disaster when
the Taliban refused to cooperate with the United States and chose to
harbor a terrorist organization. Ill bet that "steering" would have
been an awful lot better without a terrorist attack against children
in the U.S.
And this is why I feel confident pointing out that WH is nothing but
an America-hating bigot: because of his incapability to understand
both sides, and his tendency only to see America in the worst possible
light, and its enemies in the best possible light. Given his ties to
hate-filled child-murderers in Ireland, it really shouldnt come as a
suprise. If his children had been touring WTC at the time of the
attack, I wonder how his opinion of this little incident in
Afghanistan would change? Given his limited mental capacity, I'm sure
he'd point his anger in a different direction.
But Im sure you two clever, open-minded American patriots thought of
all that, right? =) Nah, what fun is rational thought when you can
smugly and ineptly point fingers?
S~
.
|
|
|
| User: "WH" |
|
| Title: Re: Seppocide in Afghanistan, (again)! |
10 Dec 2003 03:51:51 PM |
|
|
"Anon Ymous" <shastaman@my-deja.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:5c2e70b2.0312101212.77dc6b1f@posting.google.com...
Mark Tyme <MarkTyme@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:<ircetvoqu9mksan0a5u3c9e6ghkpnkf87q@4ax.com>...
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:20:12 +0100, "WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote:
The US military has admitted killing six more children in a bomb attack
in
eastern Afghanistan over the weekend. The US said the bodies of six
children
and two adults were found on Saturday following air strikes against a
compound east of Gardez, in Paktia province, the previous day.
Officials
said they suspected that Taliban leader Mullah Jilani was in the
compound at
the time. On Sunday, the US military admitted that a bomb attack in
neighbouring Ghazni province on Saturday killed nine children and two
adults. The US insisted that the target of the attack, Taliban leader
Mullah
Wazir, was killed in the strike, but local residents said he wasn't
even in
the area at the time.
Looks like the Nazis (i.e. Neocons) occupying Afghanistan had some
more "Steering" Problems.
Wow, six kids...that's awful. I feel really bad for those kids--as
any American would. We have consciences here.
Rubbish...judging by the rest of your rant you haven't any conscience at
all. Oh and it was nine kids one day and six the day after, a total of
sixteen. But they were only Afghani's eh?
However, as of August 16, 2002, a total of 2,726 death certificates
related to the WTC attacks had been filed. Of these 2,726 decedents,
2,103 (77%) were males and 623 (23%) were females. The median age for
these decedents was 39 years (range: 2--85 years).
And how does that justify the slaughtering of Afghani kids?
You two do understand, I'm sure, that the U.S. had no interest
whatsoever in Afghanistan until shortly after the WTC disaster when
the Taliban refused to cooperate with the United States and chose to
harbor a terrorist organization. Ill bet that "steering" would have
been an awful lot better without a terrorist attack against children
in the U.S.
Except of course the routing of the pipeline that the big oil companies
thought was agreed on.
And this is why I feel confident pointing out that WH is nothing but
an America-hating bigot: because of his incapability to understand
both sides, and his tendency only to see America in the worst possible
light, and its enemies in the best possible light.
Both sides of what story. 15 children killed by yankie bombs in two days and
you can
bet your yankie arse that no-one will have to answer for that. There's no
other side to it.
The Afghani's didn't blow up the WTC, nor did the Taliban. And these 15 dead
kids certainly
didn't. Talking the way you are is arrogance...
Given his ties to
hate-filled child-murderers in Ireland, it really shouldnt come as a
suprise.
Ahhh! The Tony touch. Yankie bollocks. Whilst you're trying to justify your
arrogance
throw in something you might hit on a personal level...just for good
measure. Doesn't
work with me mate...nah!
If his children had been touring WTC at the time of the
attack, I wonder how his opinion of this little incident in
Afghanistan would change?
Not a chance, still doesn't justify your arrogance.
Given his limited mental capacity, I'm sure
he'd point his anger in a different direction.
Oh look, another little typical yank attempt at a personal insult...you'll
have me in tears in a minute
if you keep that up.
But Im sure you two clever, open-minded American patriots thought of
all that, right? =) Nah, what fun is rational thought when you can
smugly and ineptly point fingers?
S~
Pompous fuckin' arrogant idiot!
It was fifteen two days. The TWC was not attacked by them.
WH
.
|
|
|
| User: "WH" |
|
| Title: Re: Seppocide in Afghanistan, (again)! |
10 Dec 2003 04:10:29 PM |
|
|
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:br84kl$59h$1@green.tninet.se...
"Anon Ymous" <shastaman@my-deja.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:5c2e70b2.0312101212.77dc6b1f@posting.google.com...
Mark Tyme <MarkTyme@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:<ircetvoqu9mksan0a5u3c9e6ghkpnkf87q@4ax.com>...
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:20:12 +0100, "WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote:
The US military has admitted killing six more children in a bomb
attack
in
eastern Afghanistan over the weekend. The US said the bodies of six
children
and two adults were found on Saturday following air strikes against a
compound east of Gardez, in Paktia province, the previous day.
Officials
said they suspected that Taliban leader Mullah Jilani was in the
compound at
the time. On Sunday, the US military admitted that a bomb attack in
neighbouring Ghazni province on Saturday killed nine children and two
adults. The US insisted that the target of the attack, Taliban leader
Mullah
Wazir, was killed in the strike, but local residents said he wasn't
even in
the area at the time.
Looks like the Nazis (i.e. Neocons) occupying Afghanistan had some
more "Steering" Problems.
Wow, six kids...that's awful. I feel really bad for those kids--as
any American would. We have consciences here.
Rubbish...judging by the rest of your rant you haven't any conscience at
all. Oh and it was nine kids one day and six the day after, a total of
sixteen. But they were only Afghani's eh?
OOPS That would be fifteen!
However, as of August 16, 2002, a total of 2,726 death certificates
related to the WTC attacks had been filed. Of these 2,726 decedents,
2,103 (77%) were males and 623 (23%) were females. The median age for
these decedents was 39 years (range: 2--85 years).
And how does that justify the slaughtering of Afghani kids?
You two do understand, I'm sure, that the U.S. had no interest
whatsoever in Afghanistan until shortly after the WTC disaster when
the Taliban refused to cooperate with the United States and chose to
harbor a terrorist organization. Ill bet that "steering" would have
been an awful lot better without a terrorist attack against children
in the U.S.
Except of course the routing of the pipeline that the big oil companies
thought was agreed on.
And this is why I feel confident pointing out that WH is nothing but
an America-hating bigot: because of his incapability to understand
both sides, and his tendency only to see America in the worst possible
light, and its enemies in the best possible light.
Both sides of what story. 15 children killed by yankie bombs in two days
and
you can
bet your yankie arse that no-one will have to answer for that. There's no
other side to it.
The Afghani's didn't blow up the WTC, nor did the Taliban. And these 15
dead
kids certainly
didn't. Talking the way you are is arrogance...
Given his ties to
hate-filled child-murderers in Ireland, it really shouldnt come as a
suprise.
Ahhh! The Tony touch. Yankie bollocks. Whilst you're trying to justify
your
arrogance
throw in something you might hit on a personal level...just for good
measure. Doesn't
work with me mate...nah!
If his children had been touring WTC at the time of the
attack, I wonder how his opinion of this little incident in
Afghanistan would change?
Not a chance, still doesn't justify your arrogance.
Given his limited mental capacity, I'm sure
he'd point his anger in a different direction.
Oh look, another little typical yank attempt at a personal insult...you'll
have me in tears in a minute
if you keep that up.
But Im sure you two clever, open-minded American patriots thought of
all that, right? =) Nah, what fun is rational thought when you can
smugly and ineptly point fingers?
S~
Pompous fuckin' arrogant idiot!
It was fifteen two days. The TWC was not attacked by them.
WH
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Anon Ymous" |
|
| Title: Re: Seppocide in Afghanistan, (again)! |
10 Dec 2003 09:57:32 PM |
|
|
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<br84kl$59h$1@green.tninet.se>...
"Anon Ymous" <shastaman@my-deja.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:5c2e70b2.0312101212.77dc6b1f@posting.google.com...
Mark Tyme <MarkTyme@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:<ircetvoqu9mksan0a5u3c9e6ghkpnkf87q@4ax.com>...
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:20:12 +0100, "WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote:
Pompous fuckin' arrogant idiot!
It was fifteen two days. The TWC was not attacked...
LOL! Pompous AND arrogant? What is the TWC anyway? Consider
yourself "wound up." =D
S~
.
|
|
|
| User: "WH" |
|
| Title: Re: Seppocide in Afghanistan, (again)! |
10 Dec 2003 10:23:58 PM |
|
|
"Anon Ymous" <shastaman@my-deja.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:5c2e70b2.0312101957.e70af63@posting.google.com...
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<br84kl$59h$1@green.tninet.se>...
"Anon Ymous" <shastaman@my-deja.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:5c2e70b2.0312101212.77dc6b1f@posting.google.com...
Mark Tyme <MarkTyme@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:<ircetvoqu9mksan0a5u3c9e6ghkpnkf87q@4ax.com>...
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:20:12 +0100, "WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Pompous fuckin' arrogant idiot!
It was fifteen two days. The TWC was not attacked...
LOL! Pompous AND arrogant? What is the TWC anyway? Consider
yourself "wound up." =D
S~
Go on...cop-out and say it was all a wind-up.
*****!
WH
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anon Ymous" |
|
| Title: Re: Seppocide in Afghanistan, (again)! |
12 Dec 2003 03:10:48 AM |
|
|
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<br8rjt$esu$1@green.tninet.se>...
"Anon Ymous" <shastaman@my-deja.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:5c2e70b2.0312101957.e70af63@posting.google.com...
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<br84kl$59h$1@green.tninet.se>...
"Anon Ymous" <shastaman@my-deja.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:5c2e70b2.0312101212.77dc6b1f@posting.google.com...
Mark Tyme <MarkTyme@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:<ircetvoqu9mksan0a5u3c9e6ghkpnkf87q@4ax.com>...
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:20:12 +0100, "WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Pompous fuckin' arrogant idiot!
It was fifteen two days. The TWC was not attacked...
LOL! Pompous AND arrogant? What is the TWC anyway? Consider
yourself "wound up." =D
S~
Go on...cop-out and say it was all a wind-up.
*****!
LOL! Works for you. =)
S~
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Hambly" |
|
| Title: Re: Seppocide in Afghanistan, (again)! |
10 Dec 2003 06:32:58 PM |
|
|
In article <5c2e70b2.0312101212.77dc6b1f@posting.google.com>, Anon Ymous wrote:
Mark Tyme <MarkTyme@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:<ircetvoqu9mksan0a5u3c9e6ghkpnkf87q@4ax.com>...
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:20:12 +0100, "WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote:
The US military has admitted killing six more children in a bomb attack in
eastern Afghanistan over the weekend. The US said the bodies of six children
and two adults were found on Saturday following air strikes against a
compound east of Gardez, in Paktia province, the previous day. Officials
said they suspected that Taliban leader Mullah Jilani was in the compound at
the time. On Sunday, the US military admitted that a bomb attack in
neighbouring Ghazni province on Saturday killed nine children and two
adults. The US insisted that the target of the attack, Taliban leader Mullah
Wazir, was killed in the strike, but local residents said he wasn't even in
the area at the time.
Looks like the Nazis (i.e. Neocons) occupying Afghanistan had some
more "Steering" Problems.
Wow, six kids...that's awful. I feel really bad for those kids--as
any American would. We have consciences here.
What a fucking *****. I don't think you could have made your
contempt anymore obvious.
However, as of August 16, 2002, a total of 2,726 death certificates
related to the WTC attacks had been filed. Of these 2,726 decedents,
2,103 (77%) were males and 623 (23%) were females. The median age for
these decedents was 39 years (range: 2--85 years).
You two do understand, I'm sure, that the U.S. had no interest
whatsoever in Afghanistan until shortly after the WTC disaster when
That is dependent upon on whether you are refering to the
interest of the U.S. citizenry or a few strategists. The
denial of facts that you are clearly intelligent enough
to understand has nothing to do with protecting American
ideals, only your own bigotry.
the Taliban refused to cooperate with the United States and chose to
harbor a terrorist organization. Ill bet that "steering" would have
been an awful lot better without a terrorist attack against children
in the U.S.
And this is why I feel confident pointing out that WH is nothing but
an America-hating bigot: because of his incapability to understand
both sides, and his tendency only to see America in the worst possible
light, and its enemies in the best possible light. Given his ties to
hate-filled child-murderers in Ireland, it really shouldnt come as a
suprise. If his children had been touring WTC at the time of the
attack, I wonder how his opinion of this little incident in
Afghanistan would change? Given his limited mental capacity, I'm sure
he'd point his anger in a different direction.
But Im sure you two clever, open-minded American patriots thought of
all that, right? =) Nah, what fun is rational thought when you can
smugly and ineptly point fingers?
S~
It is one thing to put up with hatred spewed out by an idiot. But
when an intelligent man starts doing it, while feining that he is
a caring soul, it is sickening. You are so good at epitomizing the
qualities that people hate, that if you didn't spend so much time
trying to stroke yourself, I'd almost wonder if you were trying to
generate anti-American sentiments. Thankfully, you are not typical.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anon Ymous" |
|
| Title: Re: Seppocide in Afghanistan, (again)! |
12 Dec 2003 03:31:39 AM |
|
|
Michael Hambly <michael@blackbirdsoftware.com> wrote in message news:<slrnbtfek6.id3.michael@hammer.blackbirdsoftware.com>...
In article <5c2e70b2.0312101212.77dc6b1f@posting.google.com>, Anon Ymous wrote:
Mark Tyme <MarkTyme@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:<ircetvoqu9mksan0a5u3c9e6ghkpnkf87q@4ax.com>...
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:20:12 +0100, "WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote:
The US military has admitted killing six more children in a bomb attack in
eastern Afghanistan over the weekend. The US said the bodies of six children
and two adults were found on Saturday following air strikes against a
compound east of Gardez, in Paktia province, the previous day. Officials
said they suspected that Taliban leader Mullah Jilani was in the compound at
the time. On Sunday, the US military admitted that a bomb attack in
neighbouring Ghazni province on Saturday killed nine children and two
adults. The US insisted that the target of the attack, Taliban leader Mullah
Wazir, was killed in the strike, but local residents said he wasn't even in
the area at the time.
Looks like the Nazis (i.e. Neocons) occupying Afghanistan had some
more "Steering" Problems.
Wow, six kids...that's awful. I feel really bad for those kids--as
any American would. We have consciences here.
What a fucking *****.
Well, at least you got one thing in your entire post right! But you
only identified one out of four assholes. 25% is a failing grade, I'm
afraid. =(
I don't think you could have made your
contempt anymore obvious.
Contempt for who, or what? =) I don't think you could have made your
lack of ability to interpret intent any more obvious if you tried to
suggest my post was written in Chinese.
However, as of August 16, 2002, a total of 2,726 death certificates
related to the WTC attacks had been filed. Of these 2,726 decedents,
2,103 (77%) were males and 623 (23%) were females. The median age for
these decedents was 39 years (range: 2--85 years).
You two do understand, I'm sure, that the U.S. had no interest
whatsoever in Afghanistan until shortly after the WTC disaster when
That is dependent upon on whether you are refering to the
interest of the U.S. citizenry or a few strategists. The
denial of facts that you are clearly intelligent enough
to understand has nothing to do with protecting American
ideals, only your own bigotry.
No, it really isnt dependent on any such thing--unless you happen to
be prone to fits of paranoia and fantasy. The Afghanistan mess got in
Bush's way; it wasn't part of the plan. That much was obvious prior
to the invasion of Iraq. Only people desperate to see the worst in
everything think otherwise.
the Taliban refused to cooperate with the United States and chose to
harbor a terrorist organization. Ill bet that "steering" would have
been an awful lot better without a terrorist attack against children
in the U.S.
And this is why I feel confident pointing out that WH is nothing but
an America-hating bigot: because of his incapability to understand
both sides, and his tendency only to see America in the worst possible
light, and its enemies in the best possible light. Given his ties to
hate-filled child-murderers in Ireland, it really shouldnt come as a
suprise. If his children had been touring WTC at the time of the
attack, I wonder how his opinion of this little incident in
Afghanistan would change? Given his limited mental capacity, I'm sure
he'd point his anger in a different direction.
But Im sure you two clever, open-minded American patriots thought of
all that, right? =) Nah, what fun is rational thought when you can
smugly and ineptly point fingers?
S~
It is one thing to put up with hatred spewed out by an idiot. But
when an intelligent man starts doing it, while feining that he is
a caring soul, it is sickening.
Good thing there was no feint, then, huh? Im afraid you'll just have
to take me at my word rather than espousing your mind-reading powers.
You are so good at epitomizing the
qualities that people hate, that if you didn't spend so much time
trying to stroke yourself, I'd almost wonder if you were trying to
generate anti-American sentiments.
Given your inaccuracy regarding my caring, the above
lack-of-observation doesn't have much merit, does it? =)
S~
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Tyme" |
|
| Title: Re: Seppocide in Afghanistan, (again)! |
10 Dec 2003 05:14:36 PM |
|
|
None of the Taliban, nor any Afghans were on any
of the airliners that were hijacks on 9-11-2001.
In fact, they all came from countries considered
to be America's closest allies in the Muslim world.
I guess the Nazis had to go kick someone's
dog, if not their own.
On 10 Dec 2003 12:12:45 -0800, (Anon Ymous)
wrote:
Mark Tyme <MarkTyme@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:<ircetvoqu9mksan0a5u3c9e6ghkpnkf87q@4ax.com>...
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:20:12 +0100, "WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote:
The US military has admitted killing six more children in a bomb attack in
eastern Afghanistan over the weekend. The US said the bodies of six children
and two adults were found on Saturday following air strikes against a
compound east of Gardez, in Paktia province, the previous day. Officials
said they suspected that Taliban leader Mullah Jilani was in the compound at
the time. On Sunday, the US military admitted that a bomb attack in
neighbouring Ghazni province on Saturday killed nine children and two
adults. The US insisted that the target of the attack, Taliban leader Mullah
Wazir, was killed in the strike, but local residents said he wasn't even in
the area at the time.
Looks like the Nazis (i.e. Neocons) occupying Afghanistan had some
more "Steering" Problems.
Wow, six kids...that's awful. I feel really bad for those kids--as
any American would. We have consciences here.
However, as of August 16, 2002, a total of 2,726 death certificates
related to the WTC attacks had been filed. Of these 2,726 decedents,
2,103 (77%) were males and 623 (23%) were females. The median age for
these decedents was 39 years (range: 2--85 years).
You two do understand, I'm sure, that the U.S. had no interest
whatsoever in Afghanistan until shortly after the WTC disaster when
the Taliban refused to cooperate with the United States and chose to
harbor a terrorist organization. Ill bet that "steering" would have
been an awful lot better without a terrorist attack against children
in the U.S.
And this is why I feel confident pointing out that WH is nothing but
an America-hating bigot: because of his incapability to understand
both sides, and his tendency only to see America in the worst possible
light, and its enemies in the best possible light. Given his ties to
hate-filled child-murderers in Ireland, it really shouldnt come as a
suprise. If his children had been touring WTC at the time of the
attack, I wonder how his opinion of this little incident in
Afghanistan would change? Given his limited mental capacity, I'm sure
he'd point his anger in a different direction.
But Im sure you two clever, open-minded American patriots thought of
all that, right? =) Nah, what fun is rational thought when you can
smugly and ineptly point fingers?
S~
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anon Ymous" |
|
| Title: Re: Seppocide in Afghanistan, (again)! |
10 Dec 2003 10:23:44 PM |
|
|
Mark Tyme <MarkTyme@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:<g4aftvkj9hm5ovukudqtk3c6q7609jrgsj@4ax.com>...
top posting is bad, m'kay.
None of the Taliban, nor any Afghans were on any
of the airliners that were hijacks on 9-11-2001.
In fact, they all came from countries considered
to be America's closest allies in the Muslim world.
I guess the Nazis had to go kick someone's
dog, if not their own.
Never suggested any of the Taliban or Afghans were on those planes.
However, the Taliban (who ruled...you guessed it, Afghanistan) refused
to allow the U.S. to clean up Al Qaeda (who were on those planes, and
who are based in...you guessed it, Afghanistan!). The blood of the
Afghani children stains Taliban and Al Qaeda hands first.
1. If you don't want American troops in your country, don't blow up
U.S. buildings or harbor those that do.
2. If you dont want steering problems in your country, see rule number
1.
3. If you dont want children in your country to be hurt and/or killed
while you harbor terrorists, dont hide behind children.
4. If you and/or your government choose to harbor terrorists or those
that aid them, don't expect the normally sensitive and caring American
public to get all worked up about deaths in your country.
Clearly, the Taliban and Al Qaeda drastically underestimated American
resolve. They think Americans are soft. Take those six deaths as a
big hint: Although U.S. troops would much rather not kill them, your
children will not protect you, so don't try to hide behind them.
Osama's (MHCRIPF) big mistake was pissing off the American public.
S~
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Tyme" |
|
| Title: Re: Seppocide in Afghanistan, (again)! |
10 Dec 2003 10:42:14 PM |
|
|
On 10 Dec 2003 20:23:44 -0800, (Anon Ymous)
wrote:
Mark Tyme <MarkTyme@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:<g4aftvkj9hm5ovukudqtk3c6q7609jrgsj@4ax.com>...
top posting is bad, m'kay.
None of the Taliban, nor any Afghans were on any
of the airliners that were hijacks on 9-11-2001.
In fact, they all came from countries considered
to be America's closest allies in the Muslim world.
I guess the Nazis had to go kick someone's
dog, if not their own.
Never suggested any of the Taliban or Afghans were on those planes.
However, the Taliban (who ruled...you guessed it, Afghanistan) refused
to allow the U.S. to clean up Al Qaeda (who were on those planes, and
who are based in...you guessed it, Afghanistan!). The blood of the
Afghani children stains Taliban and Al Qaeda hands first.
1. If you don't want American troops in your country, don't blow up
U.S. buildings or harbor those that do.
Saudis blew up the buildings, yet Bush Sr. is still butt buddies with
the entire Bin Laden family. And the US did not invade Saudi Arabia,
where most of the Al Qaeda come from, and where most of the
hijackers come from, and where most of Al Qaeda's funding comes
from, to this very day.
What makes you think that Al Qaeda was welcomed by the Afghani people?
They were just another, in a long line of invaders. The Taliban was
formed by the US CIA and Pakistani ISI, to oust the popularly elected
government of Rabbani and Massoud, who were not willing to give
concessions to the US to use Afhan as its natural gas pipeline
platform, but once the US installed the Taliban into power, they
immediately started negotiating with, you guessed it, ***** Cheney,
Condo Rice and George Bush for natural gas pipeline deals.
The US didn't care about Bin Laden, since he was an American
creation to begin with, and serving his role well as a Judas Goat
to flush out "troublemakers." If the US wanted him dead, they had
many opportunities along the way and chose not to.
The rest of your post is simple-minded, suck up to the Nazi Neocon
propaganda *****.
The US created Saddam, the US created Al Qaeda, The US created
Bin Laden, the US created Manuel Noriega, the US even to a large
extent created Hitler. Just ask Prescott Bush, George W.'s
grandfather, who helped fund the Fuehrer rise to power and was
his money launderer.
2. If you dont want steering problems in your country, see rule number
1.
3. If you dont want children in your country to be hurt and/or killed
while you harbor terrorists, dont hide behind children.
4. If you and/or your government choose to harbor terrorists or those
that aid them, don't expect the normally sensitive and caring American
public to get all worked up about deaths in your country.
Clearly, the Taliban and Al Qaeda drastically underestimated American
resolve. They think Americans are soft. Take those six deaths as a
big hint: Although U.S. troops would much rather not kill them, your
children will not protect you, so don't try to hide behind them.
Osama's (MHCRIPF) big mistake was pissing off the American public.
S~
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anon Ymous" |
|
| Title: Re: Seppocide in Afghanistan, (again)! |
12 Dec 2003 03:02:50 AM |
|
|
Mark Tyme <MarkTyme@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:<9vsftvo3fuohjs6vnk3g64dp8lkttqf26q@4ax.com>...
On 10 Dec 2003 20:23:44 -0800, (Anon Ymous)
wrote:
Mark Tyme <MarkTyme@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:<g4aftvkj9hm5ovukudqtk3c6q7609jrgsj@4ax.com>...
top posting is bad, m'kay.
None of the Taliban, nor any Afghans were on any
of the airliners that were hijacks on 9-11-2001.
In fact, they all came from countries considered
to be America's closest allies in the Muslim world.
I guess the Nazis had to go kick someone's
dog, if not their own.
Never suggested any of the Taliban or Afghans were on those planes.
However, the Taliban (who ruled...you guessed it, Afghanistan) refused
to allow the U.S. to clean up Al Qaeda (who were on those planes, and
who are based in...you guessed it, Afghanistan!). The blood of the
Afghani children stains Taliban and Al Qaeda hands first.
1. If you don't want American troops in your country, don't blow up
U.S. buildings or harbor those that do.
Saudis blew up the buildings, yet Bush Sr. is still butt buddies with
the entire Bin Laden family.
Is he now? =) So you think Bush Sr. is having anal sex with "the
entire Bin Laden family." Your homophobic comment (yet another
example of your tendency towards bigotry and absurd exaggeration) is
duly noted. =)
And the US did not invade Saudi Arabia,
where most of the Al Qaeda come from, and where most of the
hijackers come from, and where most of Al Qaeda's funding comes
from, to this very day.
If you're going to reply, please go back and actually read my post.
Thanks.
What makes you think that Al Qaeda was welcomed by the Afghani people?
I think, if you go back and read carefully (I know that's difficult
for you) you'll find no such suggestion on my part. Is this another
one of your idiotic conclusions based on nothing but what you want to
believe? I think it is. =)
<snip kooky, paranoid, conspiracy theories>
The rest of your post is simple-minded, suck up to the Nazi Neocon
propaganda *****.
LOL! November 21-23. =D Now, it's clear you arent able to recognize
intelligence in anything you write OR read. Simple-minded is someone
who childishly equates the U.S. military with the Waffen SS. That
would be you. Now let's examine the "suck up" portion of your moronic
statement. In order for me to "suck up," I have to expect some
"reward." Given the fact that I regularly challenge both U.S. and
Israeli policy regarding Palestinians, what would I have to gain, and
who would grant me anything? Like everything you post, your assertion
is completely inaccurate and absurd.
It's just a matter of time before you make another idiotic, paranoid
prediction and we can all sit back and laugh at you some more (like
anyone with a brain does whenever he or she reads your conspiracy
theories).
The US created Saddam, the US created Al Qaeda, The US created
Bin Laden,
What you fail to recognize (as usual in your idiotic generalizations)
is why the U.S. had anything to do with these people in the first
place. Saddam used to represent stability in the Middle East because
he was a moderate muslim. Al Qaeda and Bin Laden were trained to stop
a Communist invasion of Afghanistan. Did these actions backfire? To
a small extent, yes. But they were also both very successful for a
long time.
To your weak, narrow mind, the U.S. can do no right. Compliments of
your arrested development, you naively see them as the ULTIMATE evil
rather than as people. Luckily, you'll never be anything but a
pathetic internet troll, spewing idiocy and paranoia. And I'll be
here, enjoying laughter at your expense as you prove your bungling
nature over and over and over... November 21-23. And we both know
there's a long string of failures both preceding and following that
one, don't we? =)
the US created Manuel Noriega, the US even to a large
extent created Hitler.
No, Mr. mental quadriplegic, the U.S. did not, "to a large extent"
"create" Hitler. The people who created Hitler were the German
occultists who played with too many dangerous psychological
archetypes. You wont find any U.S. citizens among them. Were there
private U.S. citizens who sympathized with Hitler, later to regret
that support? Of course. Are you capable of judging them morally or
intellectually? Ah hah! hahahahahahaha! Oh jeez...no. Im afraid
not.
You know what really cracks me up? The thought of you, sitting by
your computer, year after year, hating America, calling those you envy
so much "nazi," fantasizing about their demise, and hoping someday
your hate-filled predictions might come true only to be disappointed
time after time. That really is humorous at a very deep level. =)
S~
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "yipee yahoo" |
|
| Title: Re: Seppocide in Afghanistan, (again)! |
13 Dec 2003 03:54:34 AM |
|
|
Seppocide -- another new word of yours, Chris ;-)
I like the word "antipodean" better ;-)
he he ;-)
Wally
------
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<3fd70f82$1@fnewsa.telia.net>...
The US military has admitted killing six more children in a bomb attack in
eastern Afghanistan over the weekend. The US said the bodies of six children
and two adults were found on Saturday following air strikes against a
compound east of Gardez, in Paktia province, the previous day. Officials
said they suspected that Taliban leader Mullah Jilani was in the compound at
the time. On Sunday, the US military admitted that a bomb attack in
neighbouring Ghazni province on Saturday killed nine children and two
adults. The US insisted that the target of the attack, Taliban leader Mullah
Wazir, was killed in the strike, but local residents said he wasn't even in
the area at the time.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
