Sharon thinks Bush's next invasion should be Iran
_________________________________________________________________________
George Bush once again accused Iran of continuing to “harbor and assist terrorists,”
July 21, warning of the consequences.
Israel, as well, on July 21, accused Iran of “trying everything” to get nuclear weapons,
and that if it succeeded, it would threaten a far wider theatre than just the Middle East.
Obviously these allegations should be seen in the context of deepening crisis in Iraq
and the planned meeting between Bush and Sharon.
It should be noted that Israel has consistently argued that the U.S. take direct
military action against Iran, and there are also powerful elements within the
Bush administration pressing for another “regime change.”
While allegations circulate that the UN inspectors found enriched uranium in
environmental samples, the stage is being set by the Bush administration to
use WMDs as a “Weapon of Mass Deception,” whipping up fear to justify an
attack or blatant interference in the internal affairs of Iran.
The Bush administration should be deprived of any pretext for aggression.
Tarkashvand, a member of Majlis (parliament) while expressing caution towards
signing of stricter terms proposed under the “Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of
Nuclear Weapons,” (NPT) stated: “It is in our national interest to prevent an
international unanimity leading to passage of a UN resolution against Iran. …
While the world’s opinion is against the proliferation of WMDs and their usage by
countries such as Iran --- through a realistic approach we must not provide
anyone with any pretext [to invade].”
Therefore the real nuclear threat in the region is from the U.S., not to mention the
military dictatorship in Pakistan and the U.S.’s strategic ally, Israel, both of which
are nuclear powers.
The exaggerated nuclear threat and Bush’s bogus support for Iran’s democracy
movement are among the tools to ensure that future changes in Iran are in line
with the administration’s strategic plans and economic interests,
not democracy and development.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is only a synopsis.
Read the full text at this www site :
http://www.pww.org/article/articleview/3846/1/174
_________________________________________________________________________
.
|
