| Topic: |
Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus |
| User: |
"Ö§âmâ ßíñ Këñoßí ®" |
| Date: |
11 Oct 2003 01:55:36 AM |
| Object: |
Shiites Finally Attack U$ Troops - Damn These Guys Are Slow |
They've been threatening this for months, I said three months ago that
they were going to attack but then they calmed down and went back to
their Mosques. Now I guess they've finished flagellating and cutting
themselves as they like to do and have finally mobilized as they said
they were going to do.
These guys are alot more amusing and bloodthirsty than the predictable
Baathists, there will be some fun and exciting surprises ahead for U$
troops. Let's just hope they attack like they claimed and don't go back
to flagellating themselves again instead...
US told to avoid main Shia area in Baghdad
By Charles Clover in Baghdad
A powerful Shia Muslim movement warned US troops on Friday not to enter
Baghdad's largest Shia neighbourhood after a gun battle there on Thursday
night killed two US soldiers and two Iraqis.
It was the worst clash yet between Iraqi Shia militiamen and US troops.
Shia leaders on Friday were calling for restraint from their followers
even as they branded America a "servant of Israel". US forces are keen to
avoid alienating Iraq's Shia population, who until now have not joined in
attacks against US forces seen mainly in Sunni areas.
Dozens of armed Shia militiamen stood guard at the site of the battle on
Friday, outside the headquarters of Muqtada al-Sadr, a popular Shia
preacher (pictured). His followers insist the building was the target of
a US raid on Thursday night, although US officials deny this.
http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?
pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&c=StoryFT&cid=1059480507818
--
-------------------------------------------
Rebel Alliance Galactic Usenet News Service
-------------------------------------------
http://www.irregulartimes.com/darthbush.html
http://snurl.com/27tb http://snurl.com/2mqo
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Shiites Finally Attack U$ Troops - Damn These Guys Are Slow |
11 Oct 2003 09:16:56 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 06:55:36 GMT, "Ö§âmâ ßÃñ Këñoßà ®"
<abuse@anarchy.gov> wrote:
They've been threatening this for months, I said three months ago that
they were going to attack but then they calmed down and went back to
their Mosques. Now I guess they've finished flagellating and cutting
themselves as they like to do and have finally mobilized as they said
they were going to do.
These guys are alot more amusing and bloodthirsty than the predictable
Baathists, there will be some fun and exciting surprises ahead for U$
troops. Let's just hope they attack like they claimed and don't go back
to flagellating themselves again instead...
US told to avoid main Shia area in Baghdad
By Charles Clover in Baghdad
A powerful Shia Muslim movement warned US troops on Friday not to enter
Baghdad's largest Shia neighbourhood after a gun battle there on Thursday
night killed two US soldiers and two Iraqis.
It was the worst clash yet between Iraqi Shia militiamen and US troops.
Shia leaders on Friday were calling for restraint from their followers
even as they branded America a "servant of Israel". US forces are keen to
avoid alienating Iraq's Shia population, who until now have not joined in
attacks against US forces seen mainly in Sunni areas.
Dozens of armed Shia militiamen stood guard at the site of the battle on
Friday, outside the headquarters of Muqtada al-Sadr, a popular Shia
preacher (pictured). His followers insist the building was the target of
a US raid on Thursday night, although US officials deny this.
http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?
pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&c=StoryFT&cid=1059480507818
Good. Lets hope they drive the terrorist American bastards right into
the gulf.
"life is like a mushroom, they feed you ***** and keep you in the dark"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jon" |
|
| Title: Re: Shiites Finally Attack U$ Troops - Damn These Guys Are Slow |
11 Oct 2003 09:57:44 AM |
|
|
In article <l54govs478igc7n9n56j1h82snikl8nm95@4ax.com>,
<DaarkSyde@home.com> wrote:
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 06:55:36 GMT, "Ö§âmâ ßÃñ Këñoßà ®"
<abuse@anarchy.gov> wrote:
They've been threatening this for months, I said three months ago that
they were going to attack but then they calmed down and went back to
their Mosques. Now I guess they've finished flagellating and cutting
themselves as they like to do and have finally mobilized as they said
they were going to do.
These guys are alot more amusing and bloodthirsty than the predictable
Baathists, there will be some fun and exciting surprises ahead for U$
troops. Let's just hope they attack like they claimed and don't go back
to flagellating themselves again instead...
US told to avoid main Shia area in Baghdad
By Charles Clover in Baghdad
A powerful Shia Muslim movement warned US troops on Friday not to enter
Baghdad's largest Shia neighbourhood after a gun battle there on Thursday
night killed two US soldiers and two Iraqis.
It was the worst clash yet between Iraqi Shia militiamen and US troops.
Shia leaders on Friday were calling for restraint from their followers
even as they branded America a "servant of Israel". US forces are keen to
avoid alienating Iraq's Shia population, who until now have not joined in
attacks against US forces seen mainly in Sunni areas.
Dozens of armed Shia militiamen stood guard at the site of the battle on
Friday, outside the headquarters of Muqtada al-Sadr, a popular Shia
preacher (pictured). His followers insist the building was the target of
a US raid on Thursday night, although US officials deny this.
http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?
pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&c=StoryFT&cid=1059480507818
Good. Lets hope they drive the terrorist American bastards right into
the gulf.
yeah .. then saddam can regain control and go back to killing the Shia
again.. DOH!
--
Jon
.
|
|
|
| User: "R.A.G.U.N.S. ®" |
|
| Title: Re: Shiites Finally Attack U$ Troops - Damn These Guys Are Slow |
13 Oct 2003 12:22:39 AM |
|
|
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, Jon <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
Good. Lets hope they drive the terrorist American bastards right into
the gulf.
yeah .. then saddam can regain control and go back to killing the Shia
again.. DOH!
Would you prefer the Shia majority in Iraq to gain control and kill YOU
instead? That is what's going to happen if there is ever a "Democracy" in
Iraq. That is why Bu$h's plan was flawed from the beginning.
Then ofcourse, liberation is not really what Bu$h intended. We know that,
the world knows that, Bu$h isn't fooling anyone.
--
Colonel -=Ö§âmâ ßíñ Këñ0ßí=-, Jedi Master
Rebel Alliance Galactic Usenet News Service
===========================================
http://www.irregulartimes.com/darthbush.html
http://snurl.com/27tb http://snurl.com/2mqo
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jon" |
|
| Title: Re: Shiites Finally Attack U$ Troops - Damn These Guys Are Slow |
13 Oct 2003 09:17:16 AM |
|
|
In article <OBK9413E1D52E1E0001138@r2-dv8.anarchy.gov>, R.A.G.U.N.S. ®
<abuse@anarchy.gov> wrote:
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, Jon <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
Good. Lets hope they drive the terrorist American bastards right into
the gulf.
yeah .. then saddam can regain control and go back to killing the Shia
again.. DOH!
Would you prefer the Shia majority in Iraq to gain control and kill YOU
instead? That is what's going to happen if there is ever a "Democracy" in
Iraq. That is why Bu$h's plan was flawed from the beginning.
No what'll happen is the Shia will get in power and the Wahhabi idiots
in Saudi Arabia next door will drop their bundle and they'll all start
fighting each other .. if democracy works and we see a progressive
nation develop then great!!! .. otherwise the second best option is for
the two whacko branches of Islam to eat each other.
--
Jon
.
|
|
|
| User: "R.A.G.U.N.S. ®" |
|
| Title: Re: Shiites Finally Attack U$ Troops - Damn These Guys Are Slow |
16 Oct 2003 12:08:09 AM |
|
|
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, Jon <nospam@nospam.com>
wrote:
Would you prefer the Shia majority in Iraq to gain control and kill
YOU instead? That is what's going to happen if there is ever a
"Democracy" in Iraq. That is why Bu$h's plan was flawed from the
beginning.
No what'll happen is the Shia will get in power and the Wahhabi idiots
in Saudi Arabia next door will drop their bundle and they'll all start
fighting each other .. if democracy works and we see a progressive
nation develop then great!!! .. otherwise the second best option is
for the two whacko branches of Islam to eat each other.
That's IF it was allowed to get that far. It won't be because only Iran
will back the Shiites if anyone does, while you'll have Saudi Arabia,
Syria, Egypt, Yemen and Jordan favoring the Baathists.
What will happen is that if the Shiites start gaining too much power, the
Baathists will assassinate key Shiite leaders and spread disinfo about
who did it. The Shiites will blame the U$ for not protecting them even if
they suspect the Baathists, and you will get what's already starting to
happen: Shiites attacking U$ troops, and radical and moderate Shiites
fighting each other. All the while, U$ troops will continue to be
attacked on a daily basis. Once U$ troops leave, the Baathists will be
back in power within a couple of weeks, if not a couple of DAYS. The
Shiites simply do not have the logistics and experience to do what the
Baathists are doing, the Baathists ran the country for them.
There is no way for Amerika to unilaterally win over there, Bu$h is
responsible for one of the biggest plunders in Amerikan history, if not
THE biggest.
--
Colonel -=Ö§âmâ ßíñ Këñ0ßí=-, Jedi Master
Rebel Alliance Galactic Usenet News Service
===========================================
http://www.irregulartimes.com/darthbush.html
http://snurl.com/27tb http://snurl.com/2mqo
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Shiites Finally Attack U$ Troops - Damn These Guys Are Slow |
12 Oct 2003 06:03:27 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 00:57:44 +1000, Jon <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
In article <l54govs478igc7n9n56j1h82snikl8nm95@4ax.com>,
<DaarkSyde@home.com> wrote:
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 06:55:36 GMT, "Ö§âmâ ßÃÂñ Këñoßà®"
<abuse@anarchy.gov> wrote:
They've been threatening this for months, I said three months ago that
they were going to attack but then they calmed down and went back to
their Mosques. Now I guess they've finished flagellating and cutting
themselves as they like to do and have finally mobilized as they said
they were going to do.
These guys are alot more amusing and bloodthirsty than the predictable
Baathists, there will be some fun and exciting surprises ahead for U$
troops. Let's just hope they attack like they claimed and don't go back
to flagellating themselves again instead...
US told to avoid main Shia area in Baghdad
By Charles Clover in Baghdad
A powerful Shia Muslim movement warned US troops on Friday not to enter
Baghdad's largest Shia neighbourhood after a gun battle there on Thursday
night killed two US soldiers and two Iraqis.
It was the worst clash yet between Iraqi Shia militiamen and US troops.
Shia leaders on Friday were calling for restraint from their followers
even as they branded America a "servant of Israel". US forces are keen to
avoid alienating Iraq's Shia population, who until now have not joined in
attacks against US forces seen mainly in Sunni areas.
Dozens of armed Shia militiamen stood guard at the site of the battle on
Friday, outside the headquarters of Muqtada al-Sadr, a popular Shia
preacher (pictured). His followers insist the building was the target of
a US raid on Thursday night, although US officials deny this.
http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?
pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&c=StoryFT&cid=1059480507818
Good. Lets hope they drive the terrorist American bastards right into
the gulf.
yeah .. then saddam can regain control and go back to killing the Shia
again.. DOH!
Saddam is history. The Iraqis will never let him back in power now.
"life is like a mushroom, they feed you ***** and keep you in the dark"
.
|
|
|
| User: "awestport" |
|
| Title: Re: Shiites Finally Attack U$ Troops - Damn These Guys Are Slow |
13 Oct 2003 02:13:30 PM |
|
|
wrote in message news:<o6diovk8nfohgvnrm3n2jmphp78ptkgaig@4ax.com>...
On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 00:57:44 +1000, Jon <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
In article <l54govs478igc7n9n56j1h82snikl8nm95@4ax.com>,
< > wrote:
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 06:55:36 GMT, "Ö§âmâ ßÃÂñ Këñoßà®"
<abuse@anarchy.gov> wrote:
They've been threatening this for months, I said three months ago that
they were going to attack but then they calmed down and went back to
their Mosques. Now I guess they've finished flagellating and cutting
themselves as they like to do and have finally mobilized as they said
they were going to do.
These guys are alot more amusing and bloodthirsty than the predictable
Baathists, there will be some fun and exciting surprises ahead for U$
troops. Let's just hope they attack like they claimed and don't go back
to flagellating themselves again instead...
US told to avoid main Shia area in Baghdad
By Charles Clover in Baghdad
A powerful Shia Muslim movement warned US troops on Friday not to enter
Baghdad's largest Shia neighbourhood after a gun battle there on Thursday
night killed two US soldiers and two Iraqis.
It was the worst clash yet between Iraqi Shia militiamen and US troops.
Shia leaders on Friday were calling for restraint from their followers
even as they branded America a "servant of Israel". US forces are keen to
avoid alienating Iraq's Shia population, who until now have not joined in
attacks against US forces seen mainly in Sunni areas.
Dozens of armed Shia militiamen stood guard at the site of the battle on
Friday, outside the headquarters of Muqtada al-Sadr, a popular Shia
preacher (pictured). His followers insist the building was the target of
a US raid on Thursday night, although US officials deny this.
http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?
pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&c=StoryFT&cid=1059480507818
Good. Lets hope they drive the terrorist American bastards right into
the gulf.
yeah .. then saddam can regain control and go back to killing the Shia
again.. DOH!
Saddam is history. The Iraqis will never let him back in power now.
And who does the world have to thank for this happy fact...
a) Santa Claus
b) France
c) The United States
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tempest" |
|
| Title: Re: Shiites Finally Attack U$ Troops - Damn These Guys Are Slow |
13 Oct 2003 02:37:16 PM |
|
|
awestport wrote:
DaarkSyde@home.com wrote in message news:<o6diovk8nfohgvnrm3n2jmphp78ptkgaig@4ax.com>...
On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 00:57:44 +1000, Jon <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
In article <l54govs478igc7n9n56j1h82snikl8nm95@4ax.com>,
<DaarkSyde@home.com> wrote:
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 06:55:36 GMT, "Ö§âmâ ßÃÂñ Këñoßà®"
<abuse@anarchy.gov> wrote:
They've been threatening this for months, I said three months ago that
they were going to attack but then they calmed down and went back to
their Mosques. Now I guess they've finished flagellating and cutting
themselves as they like to do and have finally mobilized as they said
they were going to do.
These guys are alot more amusing and bloodthirsty than the predictable
Baathists, there will be some fun and exciting surprises ahead for U$
troops. Let's just hope they attack like they claimed and don't go back
to flagellating themselves again instead...
US told to avoid main Shia area in Baghdad
By Charles Clover in Baghdad
A powerful Shia Muslim movement warned US troops on Friday not to enter
Baghdad's largest Shia neighbourhood after a gun battle there on Thursday
night killed two US soldiers and two Iraqis.
It was the worst clash yet between Iraqi Shia militiamen and US troops.
Shia leaders on Friday were calling for restraint from their followers
even as they branded America a "servant of Israel". US forces are keen to
avoid alienating Iraq's Shia population, who until now have not joined in
attacks against US forces seen mainly in Sunni areas.
Dozens of armed Shia militiamen stood guard at the site of the battle on
Friday, outside the headquarters of Muqtada al-Sadr, a popular Shia
preacher (pictured). His followers insist the building was the target of
a US raid on Thursday night, although US officials deny this.
http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?
pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&c=StoryFT&cid=1059480507818
Good. Lets hope they drive the terrorist American bastards right into
the gulf.
yeah .. then saddam can regain control and go back to killing the Shia
again.. DOH!
Saddam is history. The Iraqis will never let him back in power now.
And who does the world have to thank for this happy fact...
a) Santa Claus
b) France
c) The United States
Considering the history of the countries after the U.S. has replaced
foreign governments (Phillipines, Chile, Iran, etc.), this may not be a
happy turn of events.
--
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a
revolutionary act.
- George Orwell
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Shiites Finally Attack U$ Troops - Damn These Guys Are Slow |
11 Oct 2003 03:43:46 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 10:16:56 -0400, wrote:
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 06:55:36 GMT, "Ö§âmâ ßÃñ Këñoßà ®"
<abuse@anarchy.gov> wrote:
They've been threatening this for months, I said three months ago that
they were going to attack but then they calmed down and went back to
their Mosques. Now I guess they've finished flagellating and cutting
themselves as they like to do and have finally mobilized as they said
they were going to do.
Good. Lets hope they drive the terrorist American bastards right into
the gulf.
if they had the power to do that, they'd still be in control of
afghanistan, and iraq would own kuwait.
---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field
.
|
|
|
| User: "R.A.G.U.N.S. ®" |
|
| Title: Re: Shiites Finally Attack U$ Troops - Damn These Guys Are Slow |
13 Oct 2003 12:25:15 AM |
|
|
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, wrote:
Good. Lets hope they drive the terrorist American bastards right into
the gulf.
if they had the power to do that, they'd still be in control of
afghanistan, and iraq would own kuwait.
Instead the fundamentalist Islamic Kuwait royal family oversees the
Halliburton protectorate of Kuwait. What's the difference? They're still
fundamentalists who support Jihad right under Bu$h's nose.
Bu$h and Ariel Charon have plunged us back into the Dark Ages, instead of
discrediting Judeo-Christian/Islamic religion as they should have!
--
Colonel -=Ö§âmâ ßíñ Këñ0ßí=-, Jedi Master
Rebel Alliance Galactic Usenet News Service
===========================================
http://www.irregulartimes.com/darthbush.html
http://snurl.com/27tb http://snurl.com/2mqo
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Shiites Finally Attack U$ Troops - Damn These Guys Are Slow |
13 Oct 2003 05:55:58 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 05:25:15 GMT, "R.A.G.U.N.S. ®" <abuse@anarchy.gov>
wrote:
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, wrote:
Good. Lets hope they drive the terrorist American bastards right into
the gulf.
if they had the power to do that, they'd still be in control of
afghanistan, and iraq would own kuwait.
Instead the fundamentalist Islamic Kuwait royal family oversees the
Halliburton protectorate of Kuwait. What's the difference? They're still
fundamentalists who support Jihad right under Bu$h's nose.
really? care to prove it? and i notice you, like all losers, moved the
goalposts. the topic was how the losers are going to re-assert their
fundie view of islam. now you're changing it to some mythical
halliburton playground.
---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field
.
|
|
|
| User: "R.A.G.U.N.S. ®" |
|
| Title: Re: Shiites Finally Attack U$ Troops - Damn These Guys Are Slow |
16 Oct 2003 12:20:57 AM |
|
|
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, wrote:
if they had the power to do that, they'd still be in control of
afghanistan, and iraq would own kuwait.
Instead the fundamentalist Islamic Kuwait royal family oversees the
Halliburton protectorate of Kuwait. What's the difference? They're still
fundamentalists who support Jihad right under Bu$h's nose.
really? care to prove it? and i notice you, like all losers, moved the
goalposts. the topic was how the losers are going to re-assert their
fundie view of islam. now you're changing it to some mythical
halliburton playground.
Which part do you want proof of? First read about Halliburton, then we can
talk about Kuwait's Petroleum Theocracy...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halliburton
--
Colonel -=Ö§âmâ ßíñ Këñ0ßí=-, Jedi Master
Rebel Alliance Galactic Usenet News Service
===========================================
http://www.irregulartimes.com/darthbush.html
http://snurl.com/27tb http://snurl.com/2mqo
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Shiites Finally Attack U$ Troops - Damn These Guys Are Slow |
16 Oct 2003 11:07:29 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 05:20:57 GMT, "R.A.G.U.N.S. ®" <abuse@anarchy.gov>
wrote:
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, wrote:
if they had the power to do that, they'd still be in control of
afghanistan, and iraq would own kuwait.
Instead the fundamentalist Islamic Kuwait royal family oversees the
Halliburton protectorate of Kuwait. What's the difference? They're still
fundamentalists who support Jihad right under Bu$h's nose.
really? care to prove it? and i notice you, like all losers, moved the
goalposts. the topic was how the losers are going to re-assert their
fundie view of islam. now you're changing it to some mythical
halliburton playground.
Which part do you want proof of? First read about Halliburton, then we can
talk about Kuwait's Petroleum Theocracy...
who cares about halliburton. all you have is cliche after cliche.
again, if bush wanted oil, he could have taken it in kuwait. he didnt.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halliburton
--
Colonel -=Ö§âmâ ßíñ Këñ0ßí=-, Jedi Master
Rebel Alliance Galactic Usenet News Service
===========================================
http://www.irregulartimes.com/darthbush.html
http://snurl.com/27tb http://snurl.com/2mqo
---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field
.
|
|
|
| User: "R.A.G.U.N.S. ®" |
|
| Title: Re: Shiites Finally Attack U$ Troops - Damn These Guys Are Slow |
21 Oct 2003 04:50:37 PM |
|
|
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, wrote:
really? care to prove it? and i notice you, like all losers, moved
the goalposts. the topic was how the losers are going to re-assert
their fundie view of islam. now you're changing it to some mythical
halliburton playground.
Which part do you want proof of? First read about Halliburton, then we
can talk about Kuwait's Petroleum Theocracy...
who cares about halliburton. all you have is cliche after cliche.
Yes, I agree, it is an obvious truth. One people like you still can't seem
to comprehend the implications of.
Unless you're one of those "Christians", then its not suprising at all that
you're covering up for Bu$h.
again, if bush wanted oil, he could have taken it in kuwait. he didnt.
He couldn't have taken it in Kuwait because Amerika was acting as part of
an alliance, it couldn't act unilaterally. Bu$h Sr. wanted to go after
Saddam then, but was forced to quit.
This time Bu$h made sure the U$ was in charge, and is making sure the UN
doesn't get involved again. I wouldn't be surprised if it was the CIA that
bombed the UN building.
--
--=( Ö§âmâ ßíñ Këñ0ßí )=----- ----- --- - -
Rebel Alliance Galactic Usenet News Service
--- --- ---=================----------- - -
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Shiites Finally Attack U$ Troops - Damn These Guys Are Slow |
02 Nov 2003 01:54:45 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 21:50:37 GMT, "R.A.G.U.N.S. ®" <abuse@anarchy.gov>
wrote:
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, wrote:
really? care to prove it? and i notice you, like all losers, moved
the goalposts. the topic was how the losers are going to re-assert
their fundie view of islam. now you're changing it to some mythical
halliburton playground.
Which part do you want proof of? First read about Halliburton, then we
can talk about Kuwait's Petroleum Theocracy...
who cares about halliburton. all you have is cliche after cliche.
Yes, I agree, it is an obvious truth. One people like you still can't seem
to comprehend the implications of.
ah. the ol' 'obvious truth' fallacy, eh? you said it, so it MUST be
true
Unless you're one of those "Christians", then its not suprising at all that
you're covering up for Bu$h.
since i'm an atheist, it looks like ANOTHER of your stereotypes down
the drain.
again, if bush wanted oil, he could have taken it in kuwait. he didnt.
He couldn't have taken it in Kuwait because Amerika was acting as part of
an alliance, it couldn't act unilaterally. Bu$h Sr. wanted to go after
Saddam then, but was forced to quit.
ROFLMAO!!
the US, when it went to the UN over resolutin 1441 was acting as part
of an ALLIANCE, IDIOT!!
it decided to BREAK with that alliance, you moron! if it wanted oil,
it would have broken with the alliance in 91 just as it did in 2002.
what an idiot...
This time Bu$h made sure the U$ was in charge, and is making sure the UN
doesn't get involved again. I wouldn't be surprised if it was the CIA that
bombed the UN building.
\\
the scum puts nothing beneath him.
---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field
.
|
|
|
| User: "--= Ö§âmâ ßíñ Këñ0ßí =--" |
|
| Title: Re: Shiites Finally Attack U$ Troops - Damn These Guys Are Slow |
03 Nov 2003 05:14:06 AM |
|
|
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 21:50:37 GMT, "R.A.G.U.N.S. ®" <abuse@anarchy.gov>
wrote:
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, wrote:
really? care to prove it? and i notice you, like all losers, moved
the goalposts. the topic was how the losers are going to re-assert
their fundie view of islam. now you're changing it to some mythical
halliburton playground.
Which part do you want proof of? First read about Halliburton, then we
can talk about Kuwait's Petroleum Theocracy...
who cares about halliburton. all you have is cliche after cliche.
Yes, I agree, it is an obvious truth. One people like you still can't
seem to comprehend the implications of.
ah. the ol' 'obvious truth' fallacy, eh? you said it, so it MUST be
true
If you don't want to hear it, either present some facts, or shut the ***** up.
You're the one who said "who cares about halliburton" and then accused me of
fallacies. Idiot.
Btw, you're right, if I say it, it IS true. Now how do you like that?
Unless you're one of those "Christians", then its not suprising at all
that you're covering up for Bu$h.
since i'm an atheist, it looks like ANOTHER of your stereotypes down
the drain.
Did I say you were a Christian?
It's great how you cut out everything relevant and just leave enough to
continue your personal insults.
Now maybe you'd care to tell us why an Atheist supports are fundamentalist
Christian president.
again, if bush wanted oil, he could have taken it in kuwait. he didnt.
He couldn't have taken it in Kuwait because Amerika was acting as part
of an alliance, it couldn't act unilaterally. Bu$h Sr. wanted to go
after Saddam then, but was forced to quit.
ROFLMAO!!
the US, when it went to the UN over resolutin 1441 was acting as part
of an ALLIANCE, IDIOT!!
it decided to BREAK with that alliance, you moron! if it wanted oil,
it would have broken with the alliance in 91 just as it did in 2002.
What the hell are you babbling about? There is no way the U$ could have taken
any oil from Kuwait because of the Gulf War, with or without any resolutions.
There was absolutely no precedent to allow it to do such a thing. What would
it say to NATO and the gulf states? We've decided to take over where Saddam
left off?
Idiot.
what an idiot...
You can't resist, can you, idiot.
This time Bu$h made sure the U$ was in charge, and is making sure the UN
doesn't get involved again. I wouldn't be surprised if it was the CIA
that bombed the UN building.
\\
the scum puts nothing beneath him.
Care to go for a helicopter ride in Iraq? Just watch out if you need to stop
by the Red Cross mission afterwards, I hear they've had some trouble.
No, don't thank me, thank George WMD Bu$h.
--
--=( Ö§âmâ ßíñ Këñ0ßí )=----- ----- --- - -
Rebel Alliance Galactic Usenet News Service
--- --- ---=================----------- - -
http://snurl.com/2rsn http://snurl.com/2n1d
http://www.politicalstrikes.com/.images/ps760.jpg
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Shiites Finally Attack U$ Troops - Damn These Guys Are Slow |
03 Nov 2003 04:54:56 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 11:14:06 GMT, "--= Ö§âmâ ßíñ Këñ0ßí =--"
<abuse@anarchy.gov> wrote:
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, wrote:
Yes, I agree, it is an obvious truth. One people like you still can't
seem to comprehend the implications of.
ah. the ol' 'obvious truth' fallacy, eh? you said it, so it MUST be
true
If you don't want to hear it, either present some facts, or shut the ***** up.
You're the one who said "who cares about halliburton" and then accused me of
fallacies. Idiot.
says the guy who keeps tin foil around to make his hats.
sorry, sport. you havent shown a single shred of evidence about any
relationship between halliburton and the liberation of iraq.
Btw, you're right, if I say it, it IS true. Now how do you like that?
Unless you're one of those "Christians", then its not suprising at all
that you're covering up for Bu$h.
since i'm an atheist, it looks like ANOTHER of your stereotypes down
the drain.
Did I say you were a Christian?
ah. you dont read your own posts?
It's great how you cut out everything relevant and just leave enough to
continue your personal insults.
i left your words, such as they are, intact above. read 'em and weep.
as you should do frequently.
Now maybe you'd care to tell us why an Atheist supports are fundamentalist
Christian president.
even fundies can be right on occasion.
again, if bush wanted oil, he could have taken it in kuwait. he didnt.
He couldn't have taken it in Kuwait because Amerika was acting as part
of an alliance, it couldn't act unilaterally. Bu$h Sr. wanted to go
after Saddam then, but was forced to quit.
ROFLMAO!!
the US, when it went to the UN over resolutin 1441 was acting as part
of an ALLIANCE, IDIOT!!
it decided to BREAK with that alliance, you moron! if it wanted oil,
it would have broken with the alliance in 91 just as it did in 2002.
What the hell are you babbling about? There is no way the U$ could have taken
any oil from Kuwait because of the Gulf War, with or without any resolutions.
There was absolutely no precedent to allow it to do such a thing.
what an idiot.
you're continuously bleating that the US is STEALING iraqi oil. that's
against the LAW, you idiot. if we are NOW breaking the law, you
dedicated saint of morons, why wouldnt we do it THEN, but do it NOW?
What would
it say to NATO and the gulf states? We've decided to take over where Saddam
left off?
hell YES. lest you forget, we just DID.
This time Bu$h made sure the U$ was in charge, and is making sure the UN
doesn't get involved again. I wouldn't be surprised if it was the CIA
that bombed the UN building.
\\
the scum puts nothing beneath him.
Care to go for a helicopter ride in Iraq? Just watch out if you need to stop
by the Red Cross mission afterwards, I hear they've had some trouble.
No, don't thank me, thank George WMD Bu$h.
those of us who actually WERE red cross volunteers in war zones take
pity on the scum, like you, who hate civilization.
---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
