http://www.abc.net.au/ra/news/stories/s1451927.htm
.
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Shoot to kill order given |
02 Sep 2005 02:24:43 PM |
|
|
wrote:
http://www.abc.net.au/ra/news/stories/s1451927.htm
Well, it would be silly to shoot NOT to kill, wouldn't it? We're
talking about a city where armed lunatics are running around shooting at
rescuers. Yeah, I'd shoot 'em, too.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Shoot to kill order given |
02 Sep 2005 06:54:53 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 19:24:43 GMT, Woodswun <woodswun@tepidmail.com>
wrote:
DaarkSyde@Bushsucks.ca wrote:
http://www.abc.net.au/ra/news/stories/s1451927.htm
Well, it would be silly to shoot NOT to kill, wouldn't it? We're
talking about a city where armed lunatics are running around shooting at
rescuers. Yeah, I'd shoot 'em, too.
Woods
If the violence is necessary, why shoot to kill? why not just injure
them and make an example out of them, throw them in jail.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: Shoot to kill order given |
02 Sep 2005 05:34:21 PM |
|
|
<DaarkSyde@Bushsucks.ca> wrote in message
news:9fphh1psetl5s2fus7clelkhq1on0h9v0k@4ax.com...
On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 19:24:43 GMT, Woodswun <woodswun@tepidmail.com>
wrote:
DaarkSyde@Bushsucks.ca wrote:
http://www.abc.net.au/ra/news/stories/s1451927.htm
Well, it would be silly to shoot NOT to kill, wouldn't it? We're
talking about a city where armed lunatics are running around shooting at
rescuers. Yeah, I'd shoot 'em, too.
Woods
If the violence is necessary, why shoot to kill? why not just injure
them and make an example out of them, throw them in jail.
Shoot to injure and they may very well be able to shoot back.
Jane
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Shoot to kill order given |
02 Sep 2005 06:08:03 PM |
|
|
wrote:
On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 19:24:43 GMT, Woodswun <woodswun@tepidmail.com>
wrote:
wrote:
http://www.abc.net.au/ra/news/stories/s1451927.htm
Well, it would be silly to shoot NOT to kill, wouldn't it? We're
talking about a city where armed lunatics are running around shooting at
rescuers. Yeah, I'd shoot 'em, too.
Woods
If the violence is necessary, why shoot to kill? why not just injure
them and make an example out of them, throw them in jail.
Well, I can't speak for those giving the orders, but I wouldn't want to
have to deal with problem people, additional medical needs, or further
distracting law enforcement officials in the jailing of anyone. Killing
'em just solves a whole bunch of problems with one bullet - simple.
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Garvin" |
|
| Title: Re: Shoot to kill order given |
03 Sep 2005 07:37:42 PM |
|
|
On 2005-09-02 19:54:53 -0400, said:
On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 19:24:43 GMT, Woodswun <woodswun@tepidmail.com>
wrote:
wrote:
http://www.abc.net.au/ra/news/stories/s1451927.htm
Well, it would be silly to shoot NOT to kill, wouldn't it? We're
talking about a city where armed lunatics are running around shooting
at rescuers. Yeah, I'd shoot 'em, too.
Woods
If the violence is necessary, why shoot to kill? why not just injure
them and make an example out of them, throw them in jail.
No, shoot to kill. We shouldn't have to pay for these assholes to sit
on their asses and get a free ride. Get rid of the low lifes.
--
Chris: "Dad, what's a blowhole for?"
Peter: "I'll tell you what it's NOT for and then you'll know why I can
never go back to Sea World."
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Shoot to kill order given |
04 Sep 2005 08:56:42 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 00:37:42 GMT, Fred Garvin <garv@elaborate.net>
wrote:
On 2005-09-02 19:54:53 -0400, said:
On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 19:24:43 GMT, Woodswun <woodswun@tepidmail.com>
wrote:
wrote:
http://www.abc.net.au/ra/news/stories/s1451927.htm
Well, it would be silly to shoot NOT to kill, wouldn't it? We're
talking about a city where armed lunatics are running around shooting
at rescuers. Yeah, I'd shoot 'em, too.
Woods
If the violence is necessary, why shoot to kill? why not just injure
them and make an example out of them, throw them in jail.
No, shoot to kill. We shouldn't have to pay for these assholes to sit
on their asses and get a free ride. Get rid of the low lifes.
The American answer to everythig eh? Kill, Kill, Kill. You are
pathetic
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Shoot to kill order given |
05 Sep 2005 11:51:48 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 19:24:43 GMT, Woodswun <woodswun@tepidmail.com>
wrote:
DaarkSyde@Bushsucks.ca wrote:
http://www.abc.net.au/ra/news/stories/s1451927.htm
Well, it would be silly to shoot NOT to kill, wouldn't it? We're
talking about a city where armed lunatics are running around shooting at
rescuers. Yeah, I'd shoot 'em, too.
I would too (shoot 'em) if I felt threatened. People are getting
*raped* - damn right I'd protect myself with any means at my disposal
with lunatics like that running around.
Dani
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "jay j bee" |
|
| Title: Re: Shoot to kill order given |
06 Sep 2005 04:34:51 AM |
|
|
Dani wrote:
On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 19:24:43 GMT, Woodswun <woodswun@tepidmail.com>
wrote:
DaarkSyde@Bushsucks.ca wrote:
http://www.abc.net.au/ra/news/stories/s1451927.htm
Well, it would be silly to shoot NOT to kill, wouldn't it? We're
talking about a city where armed lunatics are running around shooting at
rescuers. Yeah, I'd shoot 'em, too.
I would too (shoot 'em) if I felt threatened. People are getting
*raped* - damn right I'd protect myself with any means at my disposal
with lunatics like that running around.
Dani
Woods
So,
A- everyone in NO with a gun is a lunatic
B- you would be one of the lunatic with a gun forcing others to "loot"
the gunshop to protect themselves while looking for drinking water and
something to eat.
JayJBee
"Modern humain and civilised.... they cal themselves."
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Shoot to kill order given |
07 Sep 2005 08:21:14 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 11:34:51 +0200, jay j bee <jayjbee@gmail.com>
wrote:
Dani wrote:
On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 19:24:43 GMT, Woodswun <woodswun@tepidmail.com>
wrote:
DaarkSyde@Bushsucks.ca wrote:
http://www.abc.net.au/ra/news/stories/s1451927.htm
Well, it would be silly to shoot NOT to kill, wouldn't it? We're
talking about a city where armed lunatics are running around shooting at
rescuers. Yeah, I'd shoot 'em, too.
I would too (shoot 'em) if I felt threatened. People are getting
*raped* - damn right I'd protect myself with any means at my disposal
with lunatics like that running around.
So,
A- everyone in NO with a gun is a lunatic
B- you would be one of the lunatic with a gun forcing others to "loot"
the gunshop to protect themselves while looking for drinking water and
something to eat.
C - I shoot if my life is threatened.
(which I said from the get go)
Dani
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
