<guskz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1106523252.269377.87060@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Short-Range nuclear missiles are also much much more accurate than
Long-Range missiles.
As well the Mach10 the speed of sound Jet plane's can also hold several
nuclear missiles which need to be lighter for the wings/belly this same
characteristic can be used for nuclear missile on small vessels.
Most devilish denatured walrus. Press wildy the flowerpot acumen in turgid
benefactor! Reverse wildy upon transubstantiated ginger hound with egregious
soup bowl filling apparatus. Eschew oligarchy,
guskz@hotmail.com wrote:
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/MISSILES/Prithvi.html
"The Prithvi-III/SS-350 can be launched from the surface of the sea,
as
well as from under the sea[13]."
For the above, a small sub instead since a small vessel would be a
little impracticale for this missile in particular but their many
many
other/smaller types . Even Osama Ben Laden's Brother was reported to
have tried to purchase a mini-single person Sub, 2 years ago in the
news.
guskz@hotmail.com wrote:
I talk about missiles on a small vessel and others rattle about
ICBM
missiles which means INTER-CONTINENTAL....now if these RATTLERS
can't
figure out you don't need a small vessel if the missile is coming
all
the way from anothe CONTINENT: But that's intelligence for you, no
matter what you say it keeps rattling away and insulting....and
they
keep rattling about the small vessel instead of their own mistake.
-------------------------------------------------------
Therefore if I'm talking about clandestine small vessels, I'm
clearly
speaking of short/mid-range missiles which are THEE MOST DANGEROUS.
Know if a 20 foot TRUCK can support India's *Prithvi*
Short/Mid-Range
Nuclear missile then a small 20 foot vessel ALSO and clandestlinely
at
night, even by distant remote control or pre-coordinate
programming:
boats travels straight without human passengers towards targeted
city
for 5 hours and then the nuclear missile launches automatically.
If it takes them time to find lost ships at sea then likewise for
the
above vessel.
WHY are Short-Range more dangerous then long-range???
1. If the missile is launched ONLY as far away as the width of
Boston
into Boston, the missile would have to be caught extremely
early....why?
Answer:
1: If you have a missile INTERCEPTOR that's 400 KM away and a
short-range missile is launched 200 KM away...your INTERCEPTOR
would
have to travel at least TWO TIMES FASTER; or MORE since the
detection
would probably occur when the short-range missile is at only 150KM
from
it's target.
2: Most Interceptors are explicity designed for long-range missiles
which reach much higher above the atmosphere before descending on
their
target, therefore a short-range, lower flying missile, is harder to
recognize and intercept.
3: Unless the Interceptor is five times faster then the
short/mid-range
missile then the interception will occur near or above the
short-range
missile's target and will still cause severe nuclear damage.
--------------------------------------------------------------
All the above criteria help explain why Nostradamus' quatrains
specify
that Italy and Egypt's destruction (Pharos Egpypt turned to ashes =
nuclear/chemical) is done through PERSIAN ships instead of the use
of
long-range missiles or the much superior aerial jet planes.
I also believe the many quatrains on Porphyry, notably the two
marvelous *columns* of Porphyry(FIRE) on the gnarled Rock (Maritime
Rock/COASTLINE) are two large *columns* of chemical or nuclear
exposives (2 *columns* of nuclear mushroom clouds):
Pictures of a Nuclear Explosion show a large *column* of firy smoke
that leads upwards to a large mushroom cloudy head of firy smoke.
.
