Why hasn't President Bush written one?
.
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: So many leaders have written books.... |
24 Mar 2007 11:28:58 AM |
|
|
On Mar 24, 8:13 am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, Woodswun
<woods...@tepidmail.com> Spat the Words
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:21:13 -0700, Steven Douglas wrote:
On Mar 23, 7:19 pm, Dani Bell wrote:
On 23 Mar 2007 16:17:39 -0700, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Mar 23, 9:42 am, Dani Bell wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 05:41:43 GMT, Styrbj=F6rn <t...@war.soon> wrot=
e:
Dani Bell wrote / skrev:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:13:55 GMT, Styrbj=F6rn <t...@war.soon>
wrote:
... APN sucks
So why are you here then? Glutton for punishment? Or do you
just know when you fit in?
I'm sorry, hms Dani, but APN once caught my interest.
Right.. but now seeing as you think this place "sucks" - why do you
stick around? That makes no sense to me. It's like going to a job
you absolutely loathe every single day but never getting paid a red
cent.
and the greatest
suckers in here are either gays or docs or WH or... No, WH!
You have a strange obsession with WH.. you've shown a steady
pattern of this for quite some time now. You should just move
on, sorry, he's not gay.
I know.
How do you know?
Oh! And thank you so much for your post about his drinking. We
should all remember him in our prayers.
You're such a sniveling little ***** bag.. I hope you run into WH in
a dark alley somewhere in Sweden one of these nights, and then try
saying the same to his face. The only part I'll regret is not
being there to witness the aftermath.
How very Christian of you.
First of all, I'm Catholic.. Irish/Italian Catholic. And yes, there
is a difference. I was Baptized in the Catholic church, I had my
first communion in the Catholic church, I had to go to CCD once a week
in the Catholic church, I had to go to confession, I went through
confirmation in the Catholic church, every Sunday I was given the Holy
communion - the whole nine yards. I grew up in a mainly Irish
neighborhood in South Boston. Being Catholic was a *huge* part of my
life, my family's life, my friend's lives etc.. growing up. I've
heard some people say there's "no difference" between a Catholic and a
Christian.. that makes no sense to me. The Christian church doesn't
even have priests.
I don't adhere to all of the teachings of the Catholic church, btw.
So Catholics don't follow the teachings of Jesus?
And secondly.. who are you to judge, ha?
If you could get happy seeing the aftermath of violence in a dark
alley, I feel perfectly comfortable questioning your belief in the
teachings of Jesus.
What is your problem?
What? What's *your* problem? Since when do I have to answer to you?
Think of it as a rhetorical question.
Hey, thanks for your concern about my bad behavior, Steven.. but I
already have a *father*!
Not concern for your bad behavior as much as wondering why someone
(who has, in the past, implied a love for Jesus) would make the
remarks you made.
Interesting that you'd think of that with a poster on usenet, but you
don't consider that when the leader of your country lies in order to
send your fellow citizens off to die.
Woods
He's worried about his image on alt.prophecies.nostradamus
He's not worried about people in Iraq getting tortured with
power circular saws and nail guns, not to mention our own
soldiers who get 30 ton trucks rolling on them on a regular
basis, and all for a war that never had to happen.
Tell that to these people (they actually had a say in the matter):
Senators Max Baucus (D-MT), Evan Bayh (D-IN), Joe Biden (D-DE), John
Breaux (D-LA), Maria Cantwell (D-WA), Jean Carnahan (D-MO), Tom Carper
(D-DE), Max Cleland (D-GA), Hillary Clinton (D-NY), Tom Daschle (D-
SD), Christopher Dodd \ (D-CT), Byron Dorgan (D-ND), John Edwards (D-
NC), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Tom Harkin (D-IA), Fritz Hollings (D-
SC), Tim Johnson(D-SD), John Kerry (D-MA), Herb Kohl (D-WI), Mary
Landrieu (D-LA), Joe Lieberman (D-CT), Blanche Lincoln (D-AR), Zell
Miller (D-GA), Bill Nelson (D-FL), Ben Nelson (D-NE), Harry Reid (D-
NV), Jay Rockefeller (D-WV), Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Robert Torricelli
(D-NJ), and Congressmen Ackerman, Andrews, Barcia, Bentsen, Berkley,
Berman, Berry, Bishop, Blagojevich, Borski, Boswell, Boucher, Boyd,
Carson, Clement, Cramer, Crowley, Davis, Deutsch, Dicks, Dooley,
Edwards, Engel, Etheridge, Ford, Frost, Gephardt, Gordon, Green, Hall,
Harman, Hill, Hoeffel, Holden, Hoyer, Israel, Jefferson, John,
Kanjorski, Kennedy, Kind, Lampson, Lantos, Lowey, Lucas, Luther,
Lynch, Maloney, Markey, Mascara, Matheson, McCarthy, McIntyre,
McNulty, Meehan, Moore, Murtha, Pascrell, Peterson, Phelps, Pomeroy,
Roemer, Ross, Rothman, Sandlin, Schiff, Sherman, Shows, Skelton,
Smith, Spratt, Stenholm, Tanner, Tauscher, Taylor, Thurman, Turner,
Waxman, Weiner, and Wexler.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: So many leaders have written books.... |
24 Mar 2007 01:43:50 PM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Mar 24, 8:13 am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, Woodswun
<woods...@tepidmail.com> Spat the Words
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:21:13 -0700, Steven Douglas wrote:
On Mar 23, 7:19 pm, Dani Bell wrote:
On 23 Mar 2007 16:17:39 -0700, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Mar 23, 9:42 am, Dani Bell wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 05:41:43 GMT, Styrbjörn <t...@war.soon> wrot
e:
Dani Bell wrote / skrev:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:13:55 GMT, Styrbjörn <t...@war.soon>
wrote:
... APN sucks
So why are you here then? Glutton for punishment? Or do you
just know when you fit in?
I'm sorry, hms Dani, but APN once caught my interest.
Right.. but now seeing as you think this place "sucks" - why do
you
stick around? That makes no sense to me. It's like going to a
job
you absolutely loathe every single day but never getting paid a
red
cent.
and the greatest
suckers in here are either gays or docs or WH or... No, WH!
You have a strange obsession with WH.. you've shown a steady
pattern of this for quite some time now. You should just
move
on, sorry, he's not gay.
I know.
How do you know?
Oh! And thank you so much for your post about his drinking. We
should all remember him in our prayers.
You're such a sniveling little ***** bag.. I hope you run into WH
in
a dark alley somewhere in Sweden one of these nights, and then
try
saying the same to his face. The only part I'll regret is not
being there to witness the aftermath.
How very Christian of you.
First of all, I'm Catholic.. Irish/Italian Catholic. And yes,
there
is a difference. I was Baptized in the Catholic church, I had my
first communion in the Catholic church, I had to go to CCD once a
week
in the Catholic church, I had to go to confession, I went through
confirmation in the Catholic church, every Sunday I was given the
Holy
communion - the whole nine yards. I grew up in a mainly Irish
neighborhood in South Boston. Being Catholic was a *huge* part of
my
life, my family's life, my friend's lives etc.. growing up. I've
heard some people say there's "no difference" between a Catholic
and a
Christian.. that makes no sense to me. The Christian church
doesn't
even have priests.
I don't adhere to all of the teachings of the Catholic church, btw.
So Catholics don't follow the teachings of Jesus?
And secondly.. who are you to judge, ha?
If you could get happy seeing the aftermath of violence in a dark
alley, I feel perfectly comfortable questioning your belief in the
teachings of Jesus.
What is your problem?
What? What's *your* problem? Since when do I have to answer to
you?
Think of it as a rhetorical question.
Hey, thanks for your concern about my bad behavior, Steven.. but I
already have a *father*!
Not concern for your bad behavior as much as wondering why someone
(who has, in the past, implied a love for Jesus) would make the
remarks you made.
Interesting that you'd think of that with a poster on usenet, but you
don't consider that when the leader of your country lies in order to
send your fellow citizens off to die.
Woods
He's worried about his image on alt.prophecies.nostradamus
He's not worried about people in Iraq getting tortured with
power circular saws and nail guns, not to mention our own
soldiers who get 30 ton trucks rolling on them on a regular
basis, and all for a war that never had to happen.
Tell that to these people (they actually had a say in the matter):
This list is very damning to Bush. This is the list of people
Bush lied to in order to get approval for this ill-advised war
with Iraq.
Senators Max Baucus (D-MT), Evan Bayh (D-IN), Joe Biden (D-DE), John
Breaux (D-LA), Maria Cantwell (D-WA), Jean Carnahan (D-MO), Tom Carper
(D-DE), Max Cleland (D-GA), Hillary Clinton (D-NY), Tom Daschle (D-
SD), Christopher Dodd \ (D-CT), Byron Dorgan (D-ND), John Edwards (D-
NC), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Tom Harkin (D-IA), Fritz Hollings (D-
SC), Tim Johnson(D-SD), John Kerry (D-MA), Herb Kohl (D-WI), Mary
Landrieu (D-LA), Joe Lieberman (D-CT), Blanche Lincoln (D-AR), Zell
Miller (D-GA), Bill Nelson (D-FL), Ben Nelson (D-NE), Harry Reid (D-
NV), Jay Rockefeller (D-WV), Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Robert Torricelli
(D-NJ), and Congressmen Ackerman, Andrews, Barcia, Bentsen, Berkley,
Berman, Berry, Bishop, Blagojevich, Borski, Boswell, Boucher, Boyd,
Carson, Clement, Cramer, Crowley, Davis, Deutsch, Dicks, Dooley,
Edwards, Engel, Etheridge, Ford, Frost, Gephardt, Gordon, Green, Hall,
Harman, Hill, Hoeffel, Holden, Hoyer, Israel, Jefferson, John,
Kanjorski, Kennedy, Kind, Lampson, Lantos, Lowey, Lucas, Luther,
Lynch, Maloney, Markey, Mascara, Matheson, McCarthy, McIntyre,
McNulty, Meehan, Moore, Murtha, Pascrell, Peterson, Phelps, Pomeroy,
Roemer, Ross, Rothman, Sandlin, Schiff, Sherman, Shows, Skelton,
Smith, Spratt, Stenholm, Tanner, Tauscher, Taylor, Thurman, Turner,
Waxman, Weiner, and Wexler.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: So many leaders have written books.... |
24 Mar 2007 01:53:52 PM |
|
|
On Mar 24, 10:43 am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Mar 24, 8:13 am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, Woodswun
<woods...@tepidmail.com> Spat the Words
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:21:13 -0700, Steven Douglas wrote:
On Mar 23, 7:19 pm, Dani Bell wrote:
On 23 Mar 2007 16:17:39 -0700, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Mar 23, 9:42 am, Dani Bell wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 05:41:43 GMT, Styrbj=F6rn <t...@war.soon> w=
rot
e:
Dani Bell wrote / skrev:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:13:55 GMT, Styrbj=F6rn <t...@war.soon>
wrote:
... APN sucks
So why are you here then? Glutton for punishment? Or do you
just know when you fit in?
I'm sorry, hms Dani, but APN once caught my interest.
Right.. but now seeing as you think this place "sucks" - why do
you
stick around? That makes no sense to me. It's like going to a
job
you absolutely loathe every single day but never getting paid a
red
cent.
and the greatest
suckers in here are either gays or docs or WH or... No, WH!
You have a strange obsession with WH.. you've shown a steady
pattern of this for quite some time now. You should just
move
on, sorry, he's not gay.
I know.
How do you know?
Oh! And thank you so much for your post about his drinking. We
should all remember him in our prayers.
You're such a sniveling little ***** bag.. I hope you run into WH
in
a dark alley somewhere in Sweden one of these nights, and then
try
saying the same to his face. The only part I'll regret is not
being there to witness the aftermath.
How very Christian of you.
First of all, I'm Catholic.. Irish/Italian Catholic. And yes,
there
is a difference. I was Baptized in the Catholic church, I had my
first communion in the Catholic church, I had to go to CCD once a
week
in the Catholic church, I had to go to confession, I went through
confirmation in the Catholic church, every Sunday I was given the
Holy
communion - the whole nine yards. I grew up in a mainly Irish
neighborhood in South Boston. Being Catholic was a *huge* part of
my
life, my family's life, my friend's lives etc.. growing up. I've
heard some people say there's "no difference" between a Catholic
and a
Christian.. that makes no sense to me. The Christian church
doesn't
even have priests.
I don't adhere to all of the teachings of the Catholic church, btw.
So Catholics don't follow the teachings of Jesus?
And secondly.. who are you to judge, ha?
If you could get happy seeing the aftermath of violence in a dark
alley, I feel perfectly comfortable questioning your belief in the
teachings of Jesus.
What is your problem?
What? What's *your* problem? Since when do I have to answer to
you?
Think of it as a rhetorical question.
Hey, thanks for your concern about my bad behavior, Steven.. but I
already have a *father*!
Not concern for your bad behavior as much as wondering why someone
(who has, in the past, implied a love for Jesus) would make the
remarks you made.
Interesting that you'd think of that with a poster on usenet, but you
don't consider that when the leader of your country lies in order to
send your fellow citizens off to die.
Woods
He's worried about his image on alt.prophecies.nostradamus
He's not worried about people in Iraq getting tortured with
power circular saws and nail guns, not to mention our own
soldiers who get 30 ton trucks rolling on them on a regular
basis, and all for a war that never had to happen.
Tell that to these people (they actually had a say in the matter):
This list is very damning to Bush. This is the list of people
Bush lied to in order to get approval for this ill-advised war
with Iraq.
You're such a liar. Oh wait, that's right, I almost forgot -- you must
assume that all Democrats are so simple-minded that they are easily
led by the grand master manipulator, GW Bush. But there are
exceptions, you know. Were you aware that former Democratic Leader
Gephardt said he did not listen to Bush for his WMD intelligence?
Instead, he went to former Clinton administration officials, and
became convinced Saddam had WMD that might be used in the United
States.
And did you know former Senate Intelligence Committee ranking member
Jay Rockefeller said we could not afford to wait for further proof,
because to wait for further proof might put fellow Americans in
danger?
And did you know former First Lady Hillary Clinton believed Saddam had
only increased his WMD programs during the four years (two of which
she was First Lady) UN inspectors were absent from Iraq?
Senators Max Baucus (D-MT), Evan Bayh (D-IN), Joe Biden (D-DE), John
Breaux (D-LA), Maria Cantwell (D-WA), Jean Carnahan (D-MO), Tom Carper
(D-DE), Max Cleland (D-GA), Hillary Clinton (D-NY), Tom Daschle (D-
SD), Christopher Dodd \ (D-CT), Byron Dorgan (D-ND), John Edwards (D-
NC), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Tom Harkin (D-IA), Fritz Hollings (D-
SC), Tim Johnson(D-SD), John Kerry (D-MA), Herb Kohl (D-WI), Mary
Landrieu (D-LA), Joe Lieberman (D-CT), Blanche Lincoln (D-AR), Zell
Miller (D-GA), Bill Nelson (D-FL), Ben Nelson (D-NE), Harry Reid (D-
NV), Jay Rockefeller (D-WV), Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Robert Torricelli
(D-NJ), and Congressmen Ackerman, Andrews, Barcia, Bentsen, Berkley,
Berman, Berry, Bishop, Blagojevich, Borski, Boswell, Boucher, Boyd,
Carson, Clement, Cramer, Crowley, Davis, Deutsch, Dicks, Dooley,
Edwards, Engel, Etheridge, Ford, Frost, Gephardt, Gordon, Green, Hall,
Harman, Hill, Hoeffel, Holden, Hoyer, Israel, Jefferson, John,
Kanjorski, Kennedy, Kind, Lampson, Lantos, Lowey, Lucas, Luther,
Lynch, Maloney, Markey, Mascara, Matheson, McCarthy, McIntyre,
McNulty, Meehan, Moore, Murtha, Pascrell, Peterson, Phelps, Pomeroy,
Roemer, Ross, Rothman, Sandlin, Schiff, Sherman, Shows, Skelton,
Smith, Spratt, Stenholm, Tanner, Tauscher, Taylor, Thurman, Turner,
Waxman, Weiner, and Wexler.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: So many leaders have written books.... |
24 Mar 2007 03:25:49 PM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
He's not worried about people in Iraq getting tortured with
power circular saws and nail guns, not to mention our own
soldiers who get 30 ton trucks rolling on them on a regular
basis, and all for a war that never had to happen.
Tell that to these people (they actually had a say in the matter):
This list is very damning to Bush. This is the list of people
Bush lied to in order to get approval for this ill-advised war
with Iraq.
You're such a liar. Oh wait, that's right, I almost forgot -- you must
assume that all Democrats are so simple-minded that they are easily
led by the grand master manipulator, GW Bush.
There is ALWAYS a certain amount of trust that is assumed between
the Congress and the Executive. For example, the Congress assumes
the Executive will not edit our spy intelligence to fit it's
agenda and then present that evidence to Congress as if it were
the original unaltered agency intel, and yet this appears to be
exactly what Bush and company did.
Are you so blinded by your misguided loyalty to the neocon
agenda that you still don't believe this happened ?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: So many leaders have written books.... |
24 Mar 2007 04:52:05 PM |
|
|
On Mar 24, 12:25 pm, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
He's not worried about people in Iraq getting tortured with
power circular saws and nail guns, not to mention our own
soldiers who get 30 ton trucks rolling on them on a regular
basis, and all for a war that never had to happen.
Tell that to these people (they actually had a say in the matter):
This list is very damning to Bush. This is the list of people
Bush lied to in order to get approval for this ill-advised war
with Iraq.
You're such a liar. Oh wait, that's right, I almost forgot -- you must
assume that all Democrats are so simple-minded that they are easily
led by the grand master manipulator, GW Bush.
There is ALWAYS a certain amount of trust that is assumed between
the Congress and the Executive. For example, the Congress assumes
the Executive will not edit our spy intelligence to fit it's
agenda and then present that evidence to Congress as if it were
the original unaltered agency intel, and yet this appears to be
exactly what Bush and company did.
You intentionally ignored some *facts* (which you snipped) that shows
how a leader in Congress did NOT rely on Bush for his WMD
intelligence. And a Senator who didn't care about further proof,
because to wait for further proof could put Americans in danger.
Another spoke of WMD intelligence that coincided with a couple of
years during which she was in the White House.
Why did you intentionally ignore those facts? Because you're a liar?
Yeah, that must be it.
Are you so blinded by your misguided loyalty to the neocon
agenda that you still don't believe this happened ?
Repeating your lie (even after I showed you differently) only makes
you a repeated liar. Repeating your lie will not make your lie come
true. Ever.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: So many leaders have written books.... |
25 Mar 2007 05:17:19 AM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Mar 24, 12:25 pm, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
He's not worried about people in Iraq getting tortured with
power circular saws and nail guns, not to mention our own
soldiers who get 30 ton trucks rolling on them on a regular
basis, and all for a war that never had to happen.
Tell that to these people (they actually had a say in the matter):
This list is very damning to Bush. This is the list of people
Bush lied to in order to get approval for this ill-advised war
with Iraq.
You're such a liar. Oh wait, that's right, I almost forgot -- you
must
assume that all Democrats are so simple-minded that they are easily
led by the grand master manipulator, GW Bush.
There is ALWAYS a certain amount of trust that is assumed between
the Congress and the Executive. For example, the Congress assumes
the Executive will not edit our spy intelligence to fit it's
agenda and then present that evidence to Congress as if it were
the original unaltered agency intel, and yet this appears to be
exactly what Bush and company did.
You intentionally ignored some *facts* (which you snipped) that shows
how a leader in Congress did NOT rely on Bush for his WMD
intelligence.
If you can't address what I said, this is going to take a
really long time.
And a Senator who didn't care about further proof,
because to wait for further proof could put Americans in danger.
Another spoke of WMD intelligence that coincided with a couple of
years during which she was in the White House.
Why did you intentionally ignore those facts? Because you're a liar?
Yeah, that must be it.
Are you so blinded by your misguided loyalty to the neocon
agenda that you still don't believe this happened ?
Repeating your lie (even after I showed you differently) only makes
you a repeated liar. Repeating your lie will not make your lie come
true. Ever.
Now you're starting to sound like Guernon.. calling people
liars without any evidence to support your claim. Is your
position really so weak that you have absolutely NO points
of argument ?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: So many leaders have written books.... |
25 Mar 2007 08:04:11 PM |
|
|
On Mar 25, 2:17 am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Mar 24, 12:25 pm, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
He's not worried about people in Iraq getting tortured with
power circular saws and nail guns, not to mention our own
soldiers who get 30 ton trucks rolling on them on a regular
basis, and all for a war that never had to happen.
Tell that to these people (they actually had a say in the matter):
This list is very damning to Bush. This is the list of people
Bush lied to in order to get approval for this ill-advised war
with Iraq.
You're such a liar. Oh wait, that's right, I almost forgot -- you
must
assume that all Democrats are so simple-minded that they are easily
led by the grand master manipulator, GW Bush.
There is ALWAYS a certain amount of trust that is assumed between
the Congress and the Executive. For example, the Congress assumes
the Executive will not edit our spy intelligence to fit it's
agenda and then present that evidence to Congress as if it were
the original unaltered agency intel, and yet this appears to be
exactly what Bush and company did.
You intentionally ignored some *facts* (which you snipped) that shows
how a leader in Congress did NOT rely on Bush for his WMD
intelligence.
If you can't address what I said, this is going to take a
really long time.
Odd, that's exactly what I was thinking about the way you snipped some
*facts* I gave you so you wouldn't have to deal with them. Your
dishonesty is astounding.
And a Senator who didn't care about further proof,
because to wait for further proof could put Americans in danger.
Another spoke of WMD intelligence that coincided with a couple of
years during which she was in the White House.
Why did you intentionally ignore those facts? Because you're a liar?
Yeah, that must be it.
Are you so blinded by your misguided loyalty to the neocon
agenda that you still don't believe this happened ?
Repeating your lie (even after I showed you differently) only makes
you a repeated liar. Repeating your lie will not make your lie come
true. Ever.
Now you're starting to sound like Guernon.. calling people
liars without any evidence to support your claim.
I did support my claim. Just because you snipped it doesn't mean I
didn't post it, you liar.
Is your position really so weak that you have absolutely NO
points of argument ?
I made my points of argument, and you snipped it. You are just
amazingly dishonest, you liar.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: So many leaders have written books.... |
26 Mar 2007 04:32:31 AM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Mar 25, 2:17 am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Mar 24, 12:25 pm, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
He's not worried about people in Iraq getting tortured with
power circular saws and nail guns, not to mention our own
soldiers who get 30 ton trucks rolling on them on a regular
basis, and all for a war that never had to happen.
Tell that to these people (they actually had a say in the
matter):
This list is very damning to Bush. This is the list of people
Bush lied to in order to get approval for this ill-advised war
with Iraq.
You're such a liar. Oh wait, that's right, I almost forgot -- you
must
assume that all Democrats are so simple-minded that they are
easily
led by the grand master manipulator, GW Bush.
There is ALWAYS a certain amount of trust that is assumed between
the Congress and the Executive. For example, the Congress assumes
the Executive will not edit our spy intelligence to fit it's
agenda and then present that evidence to Congress as if it were
the original unaltered agency intel, and yet this appears to be
exactly what Bush and company did.
You intentionally ignored some *facts* (which you snipped) that shows
how a leader in Congress did NOT rely on Bush for his WMD
intelligence.
If you can't address what I said, this is going to take a
really long time.
Odd, that's exactly what I was thinking about the way you snipped some
*facts* I gave you so you wouldn't have to deal with them. Your
dishonesty is astounding.
And a Senator who didn't care about further proof,
because to wait for further proof could put Americans in danger.
Another spoke of WMD intelligence that coincided with a couple of
years during which she was in the White House.
Why did you intentionally ignore those facts? Because you're a liar?
Yeah, that must be it.
Are you so blinded by your misguided loyalty to the neocon
agenda that you still don't believe this happened ?
Repeating your lie (even after I showed you differently) only makes
you a repeated liar. Repeating your lie will not make your lie come
true. Ever.
Now you're starting to sound like Guernon.. calling people
liars without any evidence to support your claim.
I did support my claim. Just because you snipped it doesn't mean I
didn't post it, you liar.
Is your position really so weak that you have absolutely NO
points of argument ?
I made my points of argument, and you snipped it. You are just
amazingly dishonest, you liar.
Well you've got a keyboard and fingers.. just type it again.
I only snip stuff that's irrelevant. You often type stuff
that's irrelevant.. that's why I snip it.
You call people liars but then conveniently forget to say why
they're liars.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: So many leaders have written books.... |
26 Mar 2007 11:04:51 AM |
|
|
On Mar 26, 1:32 am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Mar 25, 2:17 am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Mar 24, 12:25 pm, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
He's not worried about people in Iraq getting tortured with
power circular saws and nail guns, not to mention our own
soldiers who get 30 ton trucks rolling on them on a regular
basis, and all for a war that never had to happen.
Tell that to these people (they actually had a say in the
matter):
This list is very damning to Bush. This is the list of people
Bush lied to in order to get approval for this ill-advised war
with Iraq.
You're such a liar. Oh wait, that's right, I almost forgot -- you
must
assume that all Democrats are so simple-minded that they are
easily
led by the grand master manipulator, GW Bush.
There is ALWAYS a certain amount of trust that is assumed between
the Congress and the Executive. For example, the Congress assumes
the Executive will not edit our spy intelligence to fit it's
agenda and then present that evidence to Congress as if it were
the original unaltered agency intel, and yet this appears to be
exactly what Bush and company did.
You intentionally ignored some *facts* (which you snipped) that shows
how a leader in Congress did NOT rely on Bush for his WMD
intelligence.
If you can't address what I said, this is going to take a
really long time.
Odd, that's exactly what I was thinking about the way you snipped some
*facts* I gave you so you wouldn't have to deal with them. Your
dishonesty is astounding.
And a Senator who didn't care about further proof,
because to wait for further proof could put Americans in danger.
Another spoke of WMD intelligence that coincided with a couple of
years during which she was in the White House.
Why did you intentionally ignore those facts? Because you're a liar?
Yeah, that must be it.
Are you so blinded by your misguided loyalty to the neocon
agenda that you still don't believe this happened ?
Repeating your lie (even after I showed you differently) only makes
you a repeated liar. Repeating your lie will not make your lie come
true. Ever.
Now you're starting to sound like Guernon.. calling people
liars without any evidence to support your claim.
I did support my claim. Just because you snipped it doesn't mean I
didn't post it, you liar.
Is your position really so weak that you have absolutely NO
points of argument ?
I made my points of argument, and you snipped it. You are just
amazingly dishonest, you liar.
Well you've got a keyboard and fingers.. just type it again.
I have, several times now, and you still ignore it.
I only snip stuff that's irrelevant. You often type stuff
that's irrelevant.. that's why I snip it.
You snipped something that wasn't irrelevant. You just didn't want to
deal with it.
You call people liars but then conveniently forget to say why
they're liars.
I've explained it ad naseum. You're just refusing to deal with it
because you live in some sort of nonreality.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dr. Bipolar" |
|
| Title: Re: So many leaders have written books.... |
26 Mar 2007 02:59:30 PM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1174925091.460664.220230@l75g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 26, 1:32 am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Mar 25, 2:17 am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Mar 24, 12:25 pm, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net>
wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
He's not worried about people in Iraq getting tortured with
power circular saws and nail guns, not to mention our own
soldiers who get 30 ton trucks rolling on them on a regular
basis, and all for a war that never had to happen.
Tell that to these people (they actually had a say in the
matter):
This list is very damning to Bush. This is the list of people
Bush lied to in order to get approval for this ill-advised war
with Iraq.
You're such a liar. Oh wait, that's right, I almost forgot --
you
must
assume that all Democrats are so simple-minded that they are
easily
led by the grand master manipulator, GW Bush.
There is ALWAYS a certain amount of trust that is assumed between
the Congress and the Executive. For example, the Congress assumes
the Executive will not edit our spy intelligence to fit it's
agenda and then present that evidence to Congress as if it were
the original unaltered agency intel, and yet this appears to be
exactly what Bush and company did.
You intentionally ignored some *facts* (which you snipped) that
shows
how a leader in Congress did NOT rely on Bush for his WMD
intelligence.
If you can't address what I said, this is going to take a
really long time.
Odd, that's exactly what I was thinking about the way you snipped
some
*facts* I gave you so you wouldn't have to deal with them. Your
dishonesty is astounding.
And a Senator who didn't care about further proof,
because to wait for further proof could put Americans in danger.
Another spoke of WMD intelligence that coincided with a couple of
years during which she was in the White House.
Why did you intentionally ignore those facts? Because you're a
liar?
Yeah, that must be it.
Are you so blinded by your misguided loyalty to the neocon
agenda that you still don't believe this happened ?
Repeating your lie (even after I showed you differently) only
makes
you a repeated liar. Repeating your lie will not make your lie
come
true. Ever.
Now you're starting to sound like Guernon.. calling people
liars without any evidence to support your claim.
I did support my claim. Just because you snipped it doesn't mean I
didn't post it, you liar.
Is your position really so weak that you have absolutely NO
points of argument ?
I made my points of argument, and you snipped it. You are just
amazingly dishonest, you liar.
Well you've got a keyboard and fingers.. just type it again.
I have, several times now, and you still ignore it.
I only snip stuff that's irrelevant. You often type stuff
that's irrelevant.. that's why I snip it.
You snipped something that wasn't irrelevant. You just didn't want to
deal with it.
You call people liars but then conveniently forget to say why
they're liars.
I've explained it ad naseum. You're just refusing to deal with it
because you live in some sort of nonreality.
Yes, prophecy is *reality*. And you do believe in God's prophetic word,
don't ya?
You're making full ground contact, yep, you surely are...LOL!
You *know* there is a heaven and hell, angels and demons...
The Iraq War can be won...
The WOT is winnable...
The neocons are right...
The Katrina disaster was all Michael Brown and Ray Nagin's fault...
Leftists aren't the same as liberals...
Ronald Reagan was an intelligent leader...
Cindy Sheehan is a threat...
Liberals, er, uh leftists, er, uh, liberals (oh, forget it!) hate America
and love terrorists...
Homosexuality is an abomination against God...
The military has the answer to what ails the species...
More heavy ground contact by Stevie...a fart who's rooted in the reality
of things.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: So many leaders have written books.... |
26 Mar 2007 06:23:16 PM |
|
|
On Mar 26, 11:59 am, "Dr. Bipolar"
<doctorsalway...@theglobalasylum.com> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1174925091.460664.220230@l75g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 26, 1:32 am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Mar 25, 2:17 am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Mar 24, 12:25 pm, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net>
wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
He's not worried about people in Iraq getting tortured with
power circular saws and nail guns, not to mention our own
soldiers who get 30 ton trucks rolling on them on a regular
basis, and all for a war that never had to happen.
Tell that to these people (they actually had a say in the
matter):
This list is very damning to Bush. This is the list of people
Bush lied to in order to get approval for this ill-advised war
with Iraq.
You're such a liar. Oh wait, that's right, I almost forgot --
you
must
assume that all Democrats are so simple-minded that they are
easily
led by the grand master manipulator, GW Bush.
There is ALWAYS a certain amount of trust that is assumed between
the Congress and the Executive. For example, the Congress assumes
the Executive will not edit our spy intelligence to fit it's
agenda and then present that evidence to Congress as if it were
the original unaltered agency intel, and yet this appears to be
exactly what Bush and company did.
You intentionally ignored some *facts* (which you snipped) that
shows
how a leader in Congress did NOT rely on Bush for his WMD
intelligence.
If you can't address what I said, this is going to take a
really long time.
Odd, that's exactly what I was thinking about the way you snipped
some
*facts* I gave you so you wouldn't have to deal with them. Your
dishonesty is astounding.
And a Senator who didn't care about further proof,
because to wait for further proof could put Americans in danger.
Another spoke of WMD intelligence that coincided with a couple of
years during which she was in the White House.
Why did you intentionally ignore those facts? Because you're a
liar?
Yeah, that must be it.
Are you so blinded by your misguided loyalty to the neocon
agenda that you still don't believe this happened ?
Repeating your lie (even after I showed you differently) only
makes
you a repeated liar. Repeating your lie will not make your lie
come
true. Ever.
Now you're starting to sound like Guernon.. calling people
liars without any evidence to support your claim.
I did support my claim. Just because you snipped it doesn't mean I
didn't post it, you liar.
Is your position really so weak that you have absolutely NO
points of argument ?
I made my points of argument, and you snipped it. You are just
amazingly dishonest, you liar.
Well you've got a keyboard and fingers.. just type it again.
I have, several times now, and you still ignore it.
I only snip stuff that's irrelevant. You often type stuff
that's irrelevant.. that's why I snip it.
You snipped something that wasn't irrelevant. You just didn't want to
deal with it.
You call people liars but then conveniently forget to say why
they're liars.
I've explained it ad naseum. You're just refusing to deal with it
because you live in some sort of nonreality.
Yes, prophecy is *reality*. And you do believe in God's prophetic word,
don't ya?
You're making full ground contact, yep, you surely are...LOL!
You *know* there is a heave
What does any of this have to do with the discussion you jumped into?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: So many leaders have written books.... |
26 Mar 2007 11:26:06 PM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Mar 26, 11:59 am, "Dr. Bipolar"
<doctorsalway...@theglobalasylum.com> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1174925091.460664.220230@l75g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 26, 1:32 am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Mar 25, 2:17 am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Mar 24, 12:25 pm, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net>
wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
He's not worried about people in Iraq getting tortured
with
power circular saws and nail guns, not to mention our
own
soldiers who get 30 ton trucks rolling on them on a
regular
basis, and all for a war that never had to happen.
Tell that to these people (they actually had a say in the
matter):
This list is very damning to Bush. This is the list of
people
Bush lied to in order to get approval for this ill-advised
war
with Iraq.
You're such a liar. Oh wait, that's right, I almost forgot
--
you
must
assume that all Democrats are so simple-minded that they are
easily
led by the grand master manipulator, GW Bush.
There is ALWAYS a certain amount of trust that is assumed
between
the Congress and the Executive. For example, the Congress
assumes
the Executive will not edit our spy intelligence to fit it's
agenda and then present that evidence to Congress as if it
were
the original unaltered agency intel, and yet this appears to
be
exactly what Bush and company did.
You intentionally ignored some *facts* (which you snipped) that
shows
how a leader in Congress did NOT rely on Bush for his WMD
intelligence.
If you can't address what I said, this is going to take a
really long time.
Odd, that's exactly what I was thinking about the way you snipped
some
*facts* I gave you so you wouldn't have to deal with them. Your
dishonesty is astounding.
And a Senator who didn't care about further proof,
because to wait for further proof could put Americans in
danger.
Another spoke of WMD intelligence that coincided with a couple
of
years during which she was in the White House.
Why did you intentionally ignore those facts? Because you're a
liar?
Yeah, that must be it.
Are you so blinded by your misguided loyalty to the neocon
agenda that you still don't believe this happened ?
Repeating your lie (even after I showed you differently) only
makes
you a repeated liar. Repeating your lie will not make your lie
come
true. Ever.
Now you're starting to sound like Guernon.. calling people
liars without any evidence to support your claim.
I did support my claim. Just because you snipped it doesn't mean I
didn't post it, you liar.
Is your position really so weak that you have absolutely NO
points of argument ?
I made my points of argument, and you snipped it. You are just
amazingly dishonest, you liar.
Well you've got a keyboard and fingers.. just type it again.
I have, several times now, and you still ignore it.
I only snip stuff that's irrelevant. You often type stuff
that's irrelevant.. that's why I snip it.
You snipped something that wasn't irrelevant. You just didn't want to
deal with it.
You call people liars but then conveniently forget to say why
they're liars.
I've explained it ad naseum. You're just refusing to deal with it
because you live in some sort of nonreality.
Yes, prophecy is *reality*. And you do believe in God's prophetic word,
don't ya?
You're making full ground contact, yep, you surely are...LOL!
You *know* there is a heave
What does any of this have to do with the discussion you jumped into?
You're the one who brought up 'alternate realities'.
I think doc was pointing out the 'alternate reality' that
YOU live in.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dr. Bipolar" |
|
| Title: Re: So many leaders have written books.... |
27 Mar 2007 06:03:37 AM |
|
|
"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns98FFE436E15B4rrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Mar 26, 11:59 am, "Dr. Bipolar"
<doctorsalway...@theglobalasylum.com> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1174925091.460664.220230@l75g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 26, 1:32 am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Mar 25, 2:17 am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net>
wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Mar 24, 12:25 pm, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net>
wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
He's not worried about people in Iraq getting tortured
with
power circular saws and nail guns, not to mention our
own
soldiers who get 30 ton trucks rolling on them on a
regular
basis, and all for a war that never had to happen.
Tell that to these people (they actually had a say in
the
matter):
This list is very damning to Bush. This is the list of
people
Bush lied to in order to get approval for this ill-advised
war
with Iraq.
You're such a liar. Oh wait, that's right, I almost forgot
--
you
must
assume that all Democrats are so simple-minded that they
are
easily
led by the grand master manipulator, GW Bush.
There is ALWAYS a certain amount of trust that is assumed
between
the Congress and the Executive. For example, the Congress
assumes
the Executive will not edit our spy intelligence to fit it's
agenda and then present that evidence to Congress as if it
were
the original unaltered agency intel, and yet this appears to
be
exactly what Bush and company did.
You intentionally ignored some *facts* (which you snipped)
that
shows
how a leader in Congress did NOT rely on Bush for his WMD
intelligence.
If you can't address what I said, this is going to take a
really long time.
Odd, that's exactly what I was thinking about the way you snipped
some
*facts* I gave you so you wouldn't have to deal with them. Your
dishonesty is astounding.
And a Senator who didn't care about further proof,
because to wait for further proof could put Americans in
danger.
Another spoke of WMD intelligence that coincided with a couple
of
years during which she was in the White House.
Why did you intentionally ignore those facts? Because you're a
liar?
Yeah, that must be it.
Are you so blinded by your misguided loyalty to the neocon
agenda that you still don't believe this happened ?
Repeating your lie (even after I showed you differently) only
makes
you a repeated liar. Repeating your lie will not make your lie
come
true. Ever.
Now you're starting to sound like Guernon.. calling people
liars without any evidence to support your claim.
I did support my claim. Just because you snipped it doesn't mean
I
didn't post it, you liar.
Is your position really so weak that you have absolutely NO
points of argument ?
I made my points of argument, and you snipped it. You are just
amazingly dishonest, you liar.
Well you've got a keyboard and fingers.. just type it again.
I have, several times now, and you still ignore it.
I only snip stuff that's irrelevant. You often type stuff
that's irrelevant.. that's why I snip it.
You snipped something that wasn't irrelevant. You just didn't want
to
deal with it.
You call people liars but then conveniently forget to say why
they're liars.
I've explained it ad naseum. You're just refusing to deal with it
because you live in some sort of nonreality.
Yes, prophecy is *reality*. And you do believe in God's prophetic
word,
don't ya?
You're making full ground contact, yep, you surely are...LOL!
You *know* there is a heave
What does any of this have to do with the discussion you jumped into?
You're the one who brought up 'alternate realities'.
I think doc was pointing out the 'alternate reality' that
YOU live in.
The existentialism of my post escapes his narrow bottle of a mind,
Perseid. Try to have some pity on the former starched, freshly ironed
uniform-wearer who saluted his superiors, and shined his boots every day.
Remember that those who join the military have passed that intelligence
and knowledge test (they gave me at the exam station long ago during the
draft years) -- and I can tell you it takes something like a 12 year old
kiddie to pass the *difficult* thing. LOL! Stevie is unable to understand
the wider contextual paradigms of conversations, commonly reacting to them
much like a 12 year old. Perhaps, on the exam test, he had trouble
associating a Phillips screwdriver with a drawing of a Phillips screw
head. I think one dummy passed out in the room when I was there,
apparently mentally exhausted.
Dr. Bipolar =)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: So many leaders have written books.... |
27 Mar 2007 07:59:42 AM |
|
|
On Mar 26, 8:26 pm, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Mar 26, 11:59 am, "Dr. Bipolar"
<doctorsalway...@theglobalasylum.com> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1174925091.460664.220230@l75g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 26, 1:32 am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Mar 25, 2:17 am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Mar 24, 12:25 pm, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net>
wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
He's not worried about people in Iraq getting tortured
with
power circular saws and nail guns, not to mention our
own
soldiers who get 30 ton trucks rolling on them on a
regular
basis, and all for a war that never had to happen.
Tell that to these people (they actually had a say in the
matter):
This list is very damning to Bush. This is the list of
people
Bush lied to in order to get approval for this ill-advised
war
with Iraq.
You're such a liar. Oh wait, that's right, I almost forgot
--
you
must
assume that all Democrats are so simple-minded that they are
easily
led by the grand master manipulator, GW Bush.
There is ALWAYS a certain amount of trust that is assumed
between
the Congress and the Executive. For example, the Congress
assumes
the Executive will not edit our spy intelligence to fit it's
agenda and then present that evidence to Congress as if it
were
the original unaltered agency intel, and yet this appears to
be
exactly what Bush and company did.
You intentionally ignored some *facts* (which you snipped) that
shows
how a leader in Congress did NOT rely on Bush for his WMD
intelligence.
If you can't address what I said, this is going to take a
really long time.
Odd, that's exactly what I was thinking about the way you snipped
some
*facts* I gave you so you wouldn't have to deal with them. Your
dishonesty is astounding.
And a Senator who didn't care about further proof,
because to wait for further proof could put Americans in
danger.
Another spoke of WMD intelligence that coincided with a couple
of
years during which she was in the White House.
Why did you intentionally ignore those facts? Because you're a
liar?
Yeah, that must be it.
Are you so blinded by your misguided loyalty to the neocon
agenda that you still don't believe this happened ?
Repeating your lie (even after I showed you differently) only
makes
you a repeated liar. Repeating your lie will not make your lie
come
true. Ever.
Now you're starting to sound like Guernon.. calling people
liars without any evidence to support your claim.
I did support my claim. Just because you snipped it doesn't mean I
didn't post it, you liar.
Is your position really so weak that you have absolutely NO
points of argument ?
I made my points of argument, and you snipped it. You are just
amazingly dishonest, you liar.
Well you've got a keyboard and fingers.. just type it again.
I have, several times now, and you still ignore it.
I only snip stuff that's irrelevant. You often type stuff
that's irrelevant.. that's why I snip it.
You snipped something that wasn't irrelevant. You just didn't want to
deal with it.
You call people liars but then conveniently forget to say why
they're liars.
I've explained it ad naseum. You're just refusing to deal with it
because you live in some sort of nonreality.
Yes, prophecy is *reality*. And you do believe in God's prophetic word,
don't ya?
You're making full ground contact, yep, you surely are...LOL!
You *know* there is a heave
What does any of this have to do with the discussion you jumped into?
You're the one who brought up 'alternate realities'.
I think doc was pointing out the 'alternate reality' that
YOU live in.
The "alternate reality" I'm in right now is having to deal with the
absurdity of you first snipping some points I made, and then
pretending (in your apparent delustional state of mind) that I never
made the points.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: So many leaders have written books.... |
28 Mar 2007 06:52:50 AM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
What does any of this have to do with the discussion you jumped into?
You're the one who brought up 'alternate realities'.
I think doc was pointing out the 'alternate reality' that
YOU live in.
The "alternate reality" I'm in right now is having to deal with the
absurdity of you first snipping some points I made, and then
pretending (in your apparent delustional state of mind) that I never
made the points.
If they were relevant points, why would somebody snip them ?
You don't make any sense stevie. People only snip stuff that
is intellectual garbage. You don't spew intellectual garbage,
do you stevie ? Besides, you're a big boy.. you can retype your
squawking points.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: So many leaders have written books.... |
28 Mar 2007 09:19:55 AM |
|
|
On Mar 28, 3:52 am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
What does any of this have to do with the discussion you jumped into?
You're the one who brought up 'alternate realities'.
I think doc was pointing out the 'alternate reality' that
YOU live in.
The "alternate reality" I'm in right now is having to deal with the
absurdity of you first snipping some points I made, and then
pretending (in your apparent delustional state of mind) that I never
made the points.
If they were relevant points, why would somebody snip them ?
You don't make any sense stevie. People only snip stuff that
is intellectual garbage. You don't spew intellectual garbage,
do you stevie ? Besides, you're a big boy.. you can retype your
squawking points.
I have, several times. And you keep ignoring it again and again. In
fact, here's an example I just pulled from another thread, in which
you left this hanging on the end of a post without reply -- and I'm
sure you'll do that again:
Jay Rockefeller said we could not afford
to wait for further proof or risk putting Americans in danger. Richard
Gephardt said he learned his WMD intelligence from Clinton officials,
and he would do anything to keep a WMD from being used in this
country. And what about Tony Blair? Do you think he might have had
something to do with this? He and Clinton bombed Iraq for four days in
1998. The Clinton appointed CIA director, who told Bush "slam dunk" on
the WMD intelligence, would likely have told a different president the
same thing, don't you think?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: So many leaders have written books.... |
30 Mar 2007 04:27:56 AM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Mar 28, 3:52 am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
What does any of this have to do with the discussion you jumped into?
You're the one who brought up 'alternate realities'.
I think doc was pointing out the 'alternate reality' that
YOU live in.
The "alternate reality" I'm in right now is having to deal with the
absurdity of you first snipping some points I made, and then
pretending (in your apparent delustional state of mind) that I never
made the points.
If they were relevant points, why would somebody snip them ?
You don't make any sense stevie. People only snip stuff that
is intellectual garbage. You don't spew intellectual garbage,
do you stevie ? Besides, you're a big boy.. you can retype your
squawking points.
I have, several times. And you keep ignoring it again and again. In
fact, here's an example I just pulled from another thread, in which
you left this hanging on the end of a post without reply -- and I'm
sure you'll do that again:
Once again stevie, I only snip the intellectual garbage.
....snip !! ...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: So many leaders have written books.... |
30 Mar 2007 10:45:05 PM |
|
|
On Mar 30, 1:27 am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Mar 28, 3:52 am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
What does any of this have to do with the discussion you jumped into?
You're the one who brought up 'alternate realities'.
I think doc was pointing out the 'alternate reality' that
YOU live in.
The "alternate reality" I'm in right now is having to deal with the
absurdity of you first snipping some points I made, and then
pretending (in your apparent delustional state of mind) that I never
made the points.
If they were relevant points, why would somebody snip them ?
You don't make any sense stevie. People only snip stuff that
is intellectual garbage. You don't spew intellectual garbage,
do you stevie ? Besides, you're a big boy.. you can retype your
squawking points.
I have, several times. And you keep ignoring it again and again. In
fact, here's an example I just pulled from another thread, in which
you left this hanging on the end of a post without reply -- and I'm
sure you'll do that again:
Once again stevie, I only snip the intellectual garbage.
...snip !! ...
And once again, you're sticking your head in the sand so you don't
have to confront facts.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: So many leaders have written books.... |
24 Mar 2007 11:24:09 AM |
|
|
On Mar 24, 4:36 am, Woodswun <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:21:13 -0700, Steven Douglas wrote:
On Mar 23, 7:19 pm, Dani Bell wrote:
On 23 Mar 2007 16:17:39 -0700, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Mar 23, 9:42 am, Dani Bell wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 05:41:43 GMT, Styrbj=F6rn <t...@war.soon> wrote:
Dani Bell wrote / skrev:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:13:55 GMT, Styrbj=F6rn <t...@war.soon> wr=
ote:
... APN sucks
So why are you here then? Glutton for punishment? Or do you ju=
st
know when you fit in?
I'm sorry, hms Dani, but APN once caught my interest.
Right.. but now seeing as you think this place "sucks" - why do you
stick around? That makes no sense to me. It's like going to a job
you absolutely loathe every single day but never getting paid a red
cent.
and the greatest
suckers in here are either gays or docs or WH or... No, WH!
You have a strange obsession with WH.. you've shown a steady pat=
tern
of this for quite some time now. You should just move on, sorry=
, he's
not gay.
I know.
How do you know?
Oh! And thank you so much for your post about his drinking. We sho=
uld
all remember him in our prayers.
You're such a sniveling little ***** bag.. I hope you run into WH in=
a
dark alley somewhere in Sweden one of these nights, and then try
saying the same to his face. The only part I'll regret is not being
there to witness the aftermath.
How very Christian of you.
First of all, I'm Catholic.. Irish/Italian Catholic. And yes, there
is a difference. I was Baptized in the Catholic church, I had my
first communion in the Catholic church, I had to go to CCD once a week
in the Catholic church, I had to go to confession, I went through
confirmation in the Catholic church, every Sunday I was given the Holy
communion - the whole nine yards. I grew up in a mainly Irish
neighborhood in South Boston. Being Catholic was a *huge* part of my
life, my family's life, my friend's lives etc.. growing up. I've
heard some people say there's "no difference" between a Catholic and a
Christian.. that makes no sense to me. The Christian church doesn't
even have priests.
I don't adhere to all of the teachings of the Catholic church, btw.
So Catholics don't follow the teachings of Jesus?
And secondly.. who are you to judge, ha?
If you could get happy seeing the aftermath of violence in a dark
alley, I feel perfectly comfortable questioning your belief in the
teachings of Jesus.
What is your problem?
What? What's *your* problem? Since when do I have to answer to you?
Think of it as a rhetorical question.
Hey, thanks for your concern about my bad behavior, Steven.. but I
already have a *father*!
Not concern for your bad behavior as much as wondering why someone
(who has, in the past, implied a love for Jesus) would make the
remarks you made.
Interesting that you'd think of that with a poster on usenet, but you
don't consider that when the leader of your country lies in order to send
your fellow citizens off to die.
Interesting that you fail to see the difference between a poster on
usenet wishing violence on someone because of *words* -- and a leader
who was confronted with a potential *threat* as outlined by the
following people (and many others):
HILLARY CLINTON: "In the four years since the inspectors left,
intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild
his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery
capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort,
and sanctuary to terrorists, including al-Qaeda members ... It is
clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue
to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and
will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." (Sen. Hillary Clinton,
Congressional Record, 10/10/02, p. S10288)
AL GORE: "We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and
chemical weapons throughout his country." ("Text Of Remarks By Former
Vice President Al Gore At The Commonwealth Club, San Francisco,"
Federal News Service, 9/23/02
JOHN KERRY: "I think Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction are
a threat, and that's why I voted to hold him accountable and to make
certain that we disarm him." (NPR's "All Things Considered," 3/19/03)
JOHN KERRY: "Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is
a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He
presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently
prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's
response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons
of mass destruction. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of
mass destruction is real." (Sen. John Kerry, Remarks At Georgetown
University, Washington, DC, 1/23/03)
JAY ROCKEFELLER: "There has been some debate over how 'imminent' a
threat Iraq poses. I do believe that Iraq poses an imminent threat,
but I also believe that after September 11, that question is
increasingly outdated. It is in the nature of these weapons, and the
way they are targeted against civilian populations, that documented
capability and demonstrated intent may be the only warning we get. To
insist on further evidence could put some of our fellow Americans at
risk. Can we afford to take that chance? We cannot!" (Senator John D.
Rockefeller IV on the Senate Floor, October 10, 2002)
RICHARD GEPHARDT: "Now, I didn't listen to him about the weapons of
mass destruction. I went to the CIA, talked to George Tenet, I talked
with his top people. I talked to former Clinton officials. I became
convinced that Saddam Hussein either had weapons or components of
weapons that could wind up in the United States. We cannot have a
weapon of mass destruction used in the United States, and I'll do
anything in my power to prevent that from happening." (From NBC News,
Meet the Press, 2004)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: So many leaders have written books.... |
24 Mar 2007 01:52:27 PM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dsteven@flashmail.com> Spat the Words
On Mar 24, 4:36 am, Woodswun <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:21:13 -0700, Steven Douglas wrote:
On Mar 23, 7:19 pm, Dani Bell wrote:
On 23 Mar 2007 16:17:39 -0700, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Mar 23, 9:42 am, Dani Bell wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 05:41:43 GMT, Styrbjörn <t...@war.soon>
wrote:
Dani Bell wrote / skrev:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:13:55 GMT, Styrbjörn <t...@war.soon> wr
ote:
... APN sucks
So why are you here then? Glutton for punishment? Or do you
ju
st
know when you fit in?
I'm sorry, hms Dani, but APN once caught my interest.
Right.. but now seeing as you think this place "sucks" - why do
you
stick around? That makes no sense to me. It's like going to a
job
you absolutely loathe every single day but never getting paid a
red
cent.
and the greatest
suckers in here are either gays or docs or WH or... No, WH!
You have a strange obsession with WH.. you've shown a steady
pat
tern
of this for quite some time now. You should just move on,
sorry
, he's
not gay.
I know.
How do you know?
Oh! And thank you so much for your post about his drinking. We
sho
uld
all remember him in our prayers.
You're such a sniveling little ***** bag.. I hope you run into WH
in
a
dark alley somewhere in Sweden one of these nights, and then try
saying the same to his face. The only part I'll regret is not
being
there to witness the aftermath.
How very Christian of you.
First of all, I'm Catholic.. Irish/Italian Catholic. And yes, there
is a difference. I was Baptized in the Catholic church, I had my
first communion in the Catholic church, I had to go to CCD once a
week
in the Catholic church, I had to go to confession, I went through
confirmation in the Catholic church, every Sunday I was given the
Holy
communion - the whole nine yards. I grew up in a mainly Irish
neighborhood in South Boston. Being Catholic was a *huge* part of my
life, my family's life, my friend's lives etc.. growing up. I've
heard some people say there's "no difference" between a Catholic and
a
Christian.. that makes no sense to me. The Christian church doesn't
even have priests.
I don't adhere to all of the teachings of the Catholic church, btw.
So Catholics don't follow the teachings of Jesus?
And secondly.. who are you to judge, ha?
If you could get happy seeing the aftermath of violence in a dark
alley, I feel perfectly comfortable questioning your belief in the
teachings of Jesus.
What is your problem?
What? What's *your* problem? Since when do I have to answer to
you?
Think of it as a rhetorical question.
Hey, thanks for your concern about my bad behavior, Steven.. but I
already have a *father*!
Not concern for your bad behavior as much as wondering why someone
(who has, in the past, implied a love for Jesus) would make the
remarks you made.
Interesting that you'd think of that with a poster on usenet, but you
don't consider that when the leader of your country lies in order to
send
your fellow citizens off to die.
Interesting that you fail to see the difference between a poster on
usenet wishing violence on someone because of *words* -- and a leader
who was confronted with a potential *threat* as outlined by the
following people (and many others):
Just as we suspected stevie. You desperately want Bush to be
vindicated for mis-leading us into this w | | |
