"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns98FC15B58445Brrfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...

After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Docrodile"
<swampthing@hellsbayou.net> Spat the Words

"Perseid" <eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns98FBBB0A57E1Errfkwrantispamattbic@216.196.97.136...

After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, Woodswun
<woodswun@tepidmail.com> Spat the Words

On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:02:23 -0700, Steven Douglas wrote:

On Mar 22, 1:31 pm, Woodswun <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote:

On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 21:03:12 -0700, Steven Douglas wrote:

On Mar 21, 4:58 pm, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net>
wrote:

After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com>
Spat the Words

"Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote in message
news:etqpul$4ri$1@aioe.org...

"mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote in message
news:d1NLh.40060$zU1.38583@pd7urf1no...

Why hasn't President Bush written one?

He's tried, but the crayons keep breaking.

To be on a little more serious, if he wrote one, I would read
it.
It would be 'interesting' to see his life philosophy

synopsized

in his own words.

Bush would probably run out of words after 1 or 2 paragraphs.

It's

sort of like Ronald Reagan trying to talk nuclear disarmament
with Gorbachev at Reykjavik, Iceland in 1986. I'm sure at
least 5 minutes were devoted to arms talks, then Reagan
probably began 3 hours of old Hollywood stories. You just
can't change the basic nature of an animal that easily.

Typical leftist simpleton that you are, you continue to
underestimate Reagan. The irony is that you, simpleton, couldn't
hold a candle to Reagan and his accomplishments.

Are you talking about the same Reagan the rest of us are?!?

I don't know. Aren't we all talking about Ronald Wilson Reagan, the
40th President of the United States of America?

He was so out
of it that he called soldiers' uniforms "costumes", for crying out
loud! Not to mention the fact that *everyone* actually believed
Reagan
when he claimed to have no knowledge of the Iran-Contra nonsense.

I know. It's always amazed me the way you wacky leftists think
Reagan
was not only a certified idiot, but he was also the grand

of Iran-Contra. How could he possibly be both?

That's funny.. using 'Grand Mastermind' to describe Reagan.
Reagan could do *Bedtime for Bonzo* like nobody's business.

I think I made it pretty clear that Reagan didn't have the brain
power
to "mastermind" anything, rather, that he was so weak-minded that
Congress actually believed that he didn't have a clue that it was
even
going on.

You're probably the only person in here that considers being
addle-minded an "accomplishment".

Woods

Let's not forget that Reagan was undoubtedly more politically astute

than

the one-and-half term governor-actor, Schwarzeneggar. He didn't have
Arnie's braun, but he was just a wee bit smarter. I will give him that
much credit. LOL! Let's try to be fair. :))~

On what would you base a comparison between Ronnie and Arnold ?
How have you determined Ronnie was 'wee bit smarter' than Arnold ?
Clearly neither one of them is (was) stupid.

Well, for one thing, The Great Communicator (lol!) was 'smart enough' to
be a native-born American who qualified for a run for the Presidency.
Arnie's fans are trying to get the Constitutional law changed to get

man eligible for the Oval Office. So, at least Ronald had it all planned
out a bit better. LOL!

Ronnie was likeable, but erudite he was not. 'Political astuteness'
as with most disciplines requires years, even a lifetime, of
dedication. Some people have the knack right out of the box, while
others (like GWB) try hard but never do get the hang of it. Usually
a serious study of the law, the Constitution, and the history of
our country is a pre-requisite to a deeper understanding of how
to be an effective administrator in the US Executive office. I
somehow doubt Reagan or GWB ever do (did) any serious reading.
This is why GWB appears to be such a duck out of water when
it comes to actual diplomacy. Bush just wants what he wants
then he tries to squeeze people to perform for him.. zero diplomacy..
and the only 'selling' he seems to be any good at is just
fear-mongering, frightening people with horror stories about
mushroom clouds and suicide bombers in our streets.

Uh...Perseid...I was making a sardonic joke here. Neither of them are
worth a ***** as intelligent, wise leaders...a bit clever, congenial, and
slippery, as many politicians typically are, but they both leave me

Bush is another character whose qualifications for the Oval Office were
sparse. At least his daddy spent a long time in national politics (the
House), and was the head of the CIA. Junior's claim to the Presidency
rides on 5 nondescript years as Texas' governor. Leaders have

been chosen because they're slickly packaged by media manipulators,
financed by huge amounts of corporate money, and shoved into the faces

Americans 24/7... it's more like selling the inferior VHS tape format

the Sony Beta one, as an example, of how intense PR and slick delivery

get the public (consumers) to buy something inferior!! LOL! The same

for leaders these days. If it hadn't been for CNN's revolutionary non-

news channel being created (which set off a popular me-too trend), we'd
still be seeing more of the candidates face-to-face, in more 'real' and
'personal' situations. Now, we see them remotely in interviews, debates,
and soundbytes -- then watch their own glib self-promotions fill the
airwaves.
It's all a big fucking, silly show, for a hungry entertainment-oriented
audience that knows little about, or cares about, the substance of the
leaders they vote for, nor understands the depth of more complex issues.
Whoever has the best personality, talks and walks trendily, looks sexy

cute, or acts (and that's the word!) like the stereotypical images we

in movies and TV programs (like Bush's 'bring it on' tough stance that
gave neocons orgasms)...is usually the guy or gal most likely to get to
the top of the heap.
The so-called election process has become a cruel joke -- just another
source of amusement and entertainment for many. It's become like some

'reality series'.

Docrodile

On Mar 23, 1:21 am, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:

After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Steven Douglas"
<dste...@flashmail.com> Spat the Words

On Mar 22, 4:23 pm, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:

After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, Woodswun
<woods...@tepidmail.com> Spat the Words

On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:02:23 -0700, Steven Douglas wrote:

On Mar 22, 1:31 pm, Woodswun <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote:

On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 21:03:12 -0700, Steven Douglas wrote:

On Mar 21, 4:58 pm, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net>

wrote:

After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "mukyuk" <a...

Spat the Words

"Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote in message
news:etqpul$4ri$1@aioe.org...

"mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote in message
news:d1NLh.40060$zU1.38583@pd7urf1no...

Why hasn't President Bush written one?

He's tried, but the crayons keep breaking.

To be on a little more serious, if he wrote one, I would

it.

It would be 'interesting' to see his life philosophy

synopsized

in his own words.

Bush would probably run out of words after 1 or 2 paragraphs.

It's

sort of like Ronald Reagan trying to talk nuclear disarmament
with Gorbachev at Reykjavik, Iceland in 1986. I'm sure at
least 5 minutes were devoted to arms talks, then Reagan
probably began 3 hours of old Hollywood stories. You just
can't change the basic nature of an animal that easily.

Typical leftist simpleton that you are, you continue to
underestimate Reagan. The irony is that you, simpleton,

hold a candle to Reagan and his accomplishments.

Are you talking about the same Reagan the rest of us are?!?

I don't know. Aren't we all talking about Ronald Wilson Reagan,

40th President of the United States of America?

He was so out
of it that he called soldiers' uniforms "costumes", for crying

loud! Not to mention the fact that *everyone* actually believed

Reagan

when he claimed to have no knowledge of the Iran-Contra

I know. It's always amazed me the way you wacky leftists think

Reagan

was not only a certified idiot, but he was also the grand

of Iran-Contra. How could he possibly be both?

That's funny.. using 'Grand Mastermind' to describe Reagan.
Reagan could do *Bedtime for Bonzo* like nobody's business.

If that was all he ever did, you might have a point. You'll never

a candle to Reagan and his accomplishments, will you?

I certainly HOPE I will never be like Ronnie or you, Stephen.
B-Grade movies and a troubled political legacy are not much
to be proud of. Your hero Ronald Reagan, through his economic
policies (or lack thereof), made sure that your children will
never have as high a standard of living as you do.

Lack thereof? Were you around for Jimmy Carter's malaise? Would you
have preferred to remain in that sickly economy?

Ronnie figured out a way to bend you over, ream you in the
*****, take all your money and give it to his wealthy buddies,

How do you figure he *took* my money and gave it to his wealthy
buddies? Please explain.

and leave you feeling like you've benefitted greatly.. and
you bought their bill of lies, hook, line, and sinker.

After Carter's malaise, I did benefit greatly during Reagan's
presidency. Sorry if you continued to wallow in the malaise, but you
shouldn't think your situation speaks for everyone.

Congratulations Stevie, you've just been butt-fucked
without even getting kissed (and you didn't complain
even once).

What is it with you and your fascination for same-sex scenarios? Are
you gay?