"Wally AngleseaT >" <"<wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote
in message news:zUnxb.19225$sb4.8316@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...

I'm always seeing this set of one-sided bs whenever the anti sollog
crew run out of arguments or feel they're losing ground in debating
facts.

Facts, schmacts... Here's some facts:

Sollog couldn't

Hey, Wally -- do you suppose Min has an evil twin? Nah, nevermind --
they're both evil. ;^)

-- Stinger

"Wally AngleseaT >" <"<wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au> wrote
in message news:zUnxb.19225$sb4.8316@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...

I'm always seeing this set of one-sided bs whenever the anti sollog
crew run out of arguments or feel they're losing ground in debating
facts.

I've seen these articles and links many times, but if
you actually look into these articles more closely,
you notice the authors of each are biased to begin with and make
it obvious they've done little or no research or are at the least,
amazingly ignorant even though they'd like everyone to
believe they're being objective. As soon
as you question their research methods or check into the other side of
the story, you begin to see how sly or plain ignorant these
so called "investigative" reporters are as they conviently leave
key information out to bias readers and create laughable amounts
of disinformation which sadly most are too lazy and ignorant themselves
to either understand or verify.

In the end these articles are really an extension of this groups most
ignorant and
hateful members, so one need only take this crap with a grain of salt.



Wally AngleseaT wrote:

On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 20:08:05 +0000, Cardinal Chunder
<cc@foo.no.spam.xyzabcfghllaa.com> wrote:

Wally AngleseaT wrote:

Ya know, I just realized something funny as phuck. Ya know all those
morons here who change sollogs name in their replies so it won't
supposedly show up to "give sollog more hits in search engines"?

Well,

when someone goes to search for sollog in search engines, their anti
sollog posts won't come up at all! Hehe! Which means the only posts

that

do come up are the ones supporters of sollog post! Now thats funny!

So

once again everyone hating on sollog thinking that changing his name
will hide the truth, is actually helping sollog and ensuring the

truth

and facts are the only posts appearing and being stored on google!
Rofl!! 2 effin funny!

Oh, in which case let me say SOLLOG SOLLOG SOLLOG SOLLOG SOLLOG SOLLOG
SOLLOG SOLLOG SOLLOG SOLLOG SOLLOG SOLLOG SOLLOG SOLLOG

Click the links to see how the SOLLOG comes up with his amazing

predictions.

http://www.geocities.com/c_chunder/sollog_lotto.html
http://www.geocities.com/c_chunder/sollog_line.html

Sollog--his real name is John Patrick Ennis--considers himself to be
the Nostradamus of the nineties. He has many reported aliases: Sollog
Immanuel Adonai-Adoni; Temple of Hayah; TOH; J.P. Essene; Hisam H'asi;
Hasim Asi; El Haddid Etsah; Tony DiPaolo; Nick Ensley; and "God
Almighty."

And this:
http://www.citypaper.net/articles/022102/sl.howcol.shtml

and here:

http://www.geocities.com/zenuk72/

and here:
http://www.citypaper.net/articles/050996/article016.shtml

The New Age community doesn't think much of Sloppy:

http://www.thenewagesite.com/jjdewey/archives/article.php?num=1586&idx=1500

Here's where Sollog, as far back as 1999 threatened to SUE a UFO
group, giving them 24 hours to retract!!! (so far, NO lawsuit has been
received, and the site is still up:

http://www.aliensonearth.com/misc/1999/aug/d11-001.shtml

You *really*& should check out that last one, where JP pretends to be
a lawyer (with a fake email of legal@theasi.net) as well as everyone
else.

Remember when it was discovered that JP owned ALL of the sites he had,
then he rapidly went around and changed all the whois information to
keep the fake alive, well, that's even funnier.

--
"FOR I HAVE BECOME VENGEANCE AND YOU WILL FEEL THE WRATH"

"YOUR DOOM IS WRITTEN IN THE STARS...."

"THE DREADED NAME HAS BEEN REVEALED...YOUR DOOM IS NEAR..."

DM in meltdown mode, February 2003

Wally Anglesea? <"<wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au>> wrote in message news:<zUnxb.19225$sb4.8316@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>...

I'm always seeing this set of one-sided bs whenever the anti sollog
crew run out of arguments or feel they're losing ground in debating
facts.

I've seen these articles and links many times, but if
you actually look into these articles more closely,
you notice the authors of each are biased to begin with and make
it obvious they've done little or no research or are at the least,
amazingly ignorant even though they'd like everyone to
believe they're being objective. As soon
as you question their research methods or check into the other side of
the story, you begin to see how sly or plain ignorant these
so called "investigative" reporters are as they conviently leave
key information out to bias readers and create laughable amounts
of disinformation which sadly most are too lazy and ignorant themselves
to either understand or verify.

In the end these articles are really an extension of this groups most
ignorant and
hateful members, so one need only take this crap with a grain of salt.

[snip]

Impressive post, Wally. Takes guts to post even a semi-neutral
sollog post on these groups.
I have never had any contact with sollog but i will say that elnine is
one of the the brightest individuals i have ever been in contact
with.

He didn't come right out and reveal anything but he would leave
enough "hints" so that i could figure things out for myself.

Mostly what i learned is I have a lot to learn.

Wally Anglesea? <"<wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au>> wrote in
message news:<zUnxb.19225$sb4.8316@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>...

I'm always seeing this set of one-sided bs whenever the anti sollog
crew run out of arguments or feel they're losing ground in debating
facts.

I've seen these articles and links many times, but if
you actually look into these articles more closely,
you notice the authors of each are biased to begin with and make
it obvious they've done little or no research or are at the least,
amazingly ignorant even though they'd like everyone to
believe they're being objective. As soon
as you question their research methods or check into the other side of
the story, you begin to see how sly or plain ignorant these
so called "investigative" reporters are as they conviently leave
key information out to bias readers and create laughable amounts
of disinformation which sadly most are too lazy and ignorant themselves
to either understand or verify.

In the end these articles are really an extension of this groups most
ignorant and
hateful members, so one need only take this crap with a grain of salt.

[snip]

Impressive post, Wally. Takes guts to post even a semi-neutral
sollog post on these groups.
I have never had any contact with sollog but i will say that elnine is
one of the the brightest individuals i have ever been in contact
with. He didn't come right out and reveal anything but he would leave
enough "hints" so that i could figure things out for myself.

Mostly what i learned is I have a lot to learn.

Wally Anglesea? <"<wanglese"@spammersbigpondareparasites.net.au>> wrote in message news:<zUnxb.19225$sb4.8316@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>...

I'm always seeing this set of one-sided bs whenever the anti sollog
crew run out of arguments or feel they're losing ground in debating
facts.

I've seen these articles and links many times, but if
you actually look into these articles more closely,
you notice the authors of each are biased to begin with and make
it obvious they've done little or no research or are at the least,
amazingly ignorant even though they'd like everyone to
believe they're being objective. As soon
as you question their research methods or check into the other side of
the story, you begin to see how sly or plain ignorant these
so called "investigative" reporters are as they conviently leave
key information out to bias readers and create laughable amounts
of disinformation which sadly most are too lazy and ignorant themselves
to either understand or verify.

In the end these articles are really an extension of this groups most
ignorant and
hateful members, so one need only take this crap with a grain of salt.

[snip]

Impressive post, Wally. Takes guts to post even a semi-neutral
sollog post on these groups.

I have never had any contact with sollog but i will say that elnine is
one of the the brightest individuals i have ever been in contact
with.

He didn't come right out and reveal anything but he would leave
enough "hints" so that i could figure things out for myself.

Mostly what i learned is I have a lot to learn.