Jean,
You might not like what I have to say, but after just looking over
this group, I feel it needs to be said for your own good.
You throw the "anti-semite" and "terrorist supporter" accusations
around way too often and easily. You have called Krib criminally
insane and an anti-American - you've called Tom an anti-semite
over and over but yet you're unable to produce even one post of his
that is anti-semitic. Also.. why do you think he would be fighting
this accusation so hard if he really is an anti-semite? If he was
one, it would be evident. You've obviously offended him to the
point where he's not going to let this go.
And Krib.. he's most certainly not an anti-American. He's travelled
here, and he told me that he thought Boston was great and the people
were great. He's also said in the past that he has love for America.
So again, like with Tom, I'm sure Krib is offended by that accusation
which is why you are getting so much flack on this group. You can't
expect to throw those accusations out so easily without retribution.
I also remember Krib saying once (before this happened between you
guys) that he liked you even though he's been told by you that he has
"wallowed in fartitude" ..
The point is you throw these accusations around way too easily. When
you're constantly accusing people of it - your words lose conviction
and begin to fall upon deaf ears.. hence you're doing yourself a
disservice because when you come across a *real* anti-semite,
anti-American terrorist supporter - people will think: "Oh there's
Jean shouting anti-semitism and anti-Americanism again!"
Tom isn't an anti-semite, Jean.. and Krib is not anti-American.
It takes a strong man to admit when he is wrong. And it's always
respected and admired when he does.
Maybe you can try?
Dani
.
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: SHAME ON YOU DANI! Re: First reply to this DANI. Re: Some advice.. |
25 Oct 2004 11:13:31 AM |
|
|
Dani a écrit:
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 15:56:45 GMT, "Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"Dani" <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9gmmn0p891haqqoc2ahe52e36kqgrjgi5m@4ax.com...
Dani, thanks for your intercession and all you've said I do
appreciate it.
You're very welcome.
I wonder though if it's worth your risking
your friendship with Jean over something this stupid?
I also appreciate your kindness and your consideration
for what may happen to me in this regard. Maybe I am
too much of a "busy body" and stick my nose where it
doesn't belong sometimes.. but it's really just who I am
and I find it extremely difficult not to voice my opinion
when I see a situation where someone is being unfairly
treated.
Jean and I were close friends at one point in time when I
first joined this group. I honest to God, no word of a lie
tried my hardest to be decent with him in this exchange,
Krib - but he just suggested that I may have "liked" what
Tony did to me. I don't see a friendship anymore after
that statement.
All I said is that what they do to me with their unrelated attacks and
lies about my personal life, is the same was what tony did to you about
yours. The same fucking thing.
This is PURE HYPOCRISY, and apparently just to kiss up to these losers
and insist that there bringing up personal lives lies about me is
somewhat more acceptable than when Tony did the same to you. IT IS NOT.
IT NEVER WILL BE. IT WILL ALWAYS BE THE SAME FUCKING THING, AND if the
"MAYBE" is not TRUE, then the same applies to what they do to me.
The object of the MAYBE is to put you in the context of your disgusting
siding with total weasels who attack personal lives. These personal
lies and attacks on my character from these pieces of ***** to me are the
SAME lowlife attacks as they are from Tony to you. PERIOD.
For you to find them acceptable in my case and not in yours ONLY SHOWS
YOUR TOTAL BIAS.
SHAME ON YOU for saying these are OK when directed against me.
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Barbarossa" |
|
| Title: Re: SHAME ON YOU DANI! Re: First reply to this DANI. Re: Some advice.. |
29 Oct 2004 06:34:43 AM |
|
|
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> schreef in bericht
news:LC9fd.3899617$6p.650255@news.easynews.com...
Dani a écrit:
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 15:56:45 GMT, "Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"Dani" <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9gmmn0p891haqqoc2ahe52e36kqgrjgi5m@4ax.com...
Dani, thanks for your intercession and all you've said I do
appreciate it.
You're very welcome.
I wonder though if it's worth your risking
your friendship with Jean over something this stupid?
I also appreciate your kindness and your consideration
for what may happen to me in this regard. Maybe I am
too much of a "busy body" and stick my nose where it
doesn't belong sometimes.. but it's really just who I am
and I find it extremely difficult not to voice my opinion
when I see a situation where someone is being unfairly
treated.
Jean and I were close friends at one point in time when I
first joined this group. I honest to God, no word of a lie
tried my hardest to be decent with him in this exchange,
Krib - but he just suggested that I may have "liked" what
Tony did to me. I don't see a friendship anymore after
that statement.
All I said is that what they do to me with their unrelated attacks and
lies about my personal life, is the same was what tony did to you about
yours. The same fucking thing.
This is PURE HYPOCRISY, and apparently just to kiss up to these losers
and insist that there bringing up personal lives lies about me is
somewhat more acceptable than when Tony did the same to you. IT IS NOT.
IT NEVER WILL BE. IT WILL ALWAYS BE THE SAME FUCKING THING, AND if the
"MAYBE" is not TRUE, then the same applies to what they do to me.
The object of the MAYBE is to put you in the context of your disgusting
siding with total weasels who attack personal lives. These personal
lies and attacks on my character from these pieces of ***** to me are the
SAME lowlife attacks as they are from Tony to you. PERIOD.
For you to find them acceptable in my case and not in yours ONLY SHOWS
YOUR TOTAL BIAS.
SHAME ON YOU for saying these are OK when directed against me.
What is coming at you is most often coming from you!
Kind Regards,
Barbarossa
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: SHAME ON YOU DANI! Re: First reply to this DANI. Re: Some advice.. |
29 Oct 2004 01:39:48 PM |
|
|
Liar.
J.
Barbarossa a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> schreef in bericht
news:LC9fd.3899617$6p.650255@news.easynews.com...
Dani a écrit:
[snip]
What is coming at you is most often coming from you!
Kind Regards,
Barbarossa
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: SHAME ON YOU DANI! Re: First reply to this DANI. Re: Some advice.. |
26 Oct 2004 07:22:53 AM |
|
|
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:LC9fd.3899617$6p.650255@news.easynews.com...
Dani a écrit:
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 15:56:45 GMT, "Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"Dani" <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9gmmn0p891haqqoc2ahe52e36kqgrjgi5m@4ax.com...
Dani, thanks for your intercession and all you've said I do
appreciate it.
You're very welcome.
I wonder though if it's worth your risking
your friendship with Jean over something this stupid?
I also appreciate your kindness and your consideration
for what may happen to me in this regard. Maybe I am
too much of a "busy body" and stick my nose where it
doesn't belong sometimes.. but it's really just who I am
and I find it extremely difficult not to voice my opinion
when I see a situation where someone is being unfairly
treated.
Jean and I were close friends at one point in time when I
first joined this group. I honest to God, no word of a lie
tried my hardest to be decent with him in this exchange,
Krib - but he just suggested that I may have "liked" what
Tony did to me. I don't see a friendship anymore after
that statement.
All I said is that what they do to me with their unrelated attacks and
lies about my personal life, is the same was what tony did to you about
yours. The same fucking thing.
Not at all. None of the "lies" you claim me and Kriob throw at you woudl
have been thrown at you at all if it weren't for your overwhelming desire to
smear everyone who disagrees with you or exposes the stupidity of your
arguments as "anti-american" or an "anti-semite". BNoth of which are,
incidentally, lies about private lives.
This is PURE HYPOCRISY
I'm glad you're starting to realise what your problem is.
, and apparently just to kiss up to these losers
Why on EARTH would Dani want to "kiss up" to either me or Krib?`Are you
implying the girl cannot make a standpoint of her own? That she simply says
what she thinks will ingratiate her with other people?! That is not the
impression of Dani I have got over the last 4 years or soo - the impression
I have got is of a strong minded young woman who calls it as she sees it.
and insist that there bringing up personal lives lies about me is
somewhat more acceptable than when Tony did the same to you.
I believe she's saying it's never right, and that you are just as wrong to
do it as anyone else. She's also pointing it out that you brought it on
yourself by choosing this path form teh beginning.
IT IS NOT.
IT NEVER WILL BE. IT WILL ALWAYS BE THE SAME FUCKING THING, AND if the
"MAYBE" is not TRUE, then the same applies to what they do to me.
You reap what you sow, Jean. Bit late to start whining about it now.
The object of the MAYBE is to put you in the context of your disgusting
siding with total weasels who attack personal lives. These personal
lies and attacks on my character from these pieces of ***** to me are the
SAME lowlife attacks as they are from Tony to you. PERIOD.
...and as they are from Jean to me, Krib, Flyfish (/Remeber him?) Barbarossa
etc etc..
For you to find them acceptable in my case and not in yours ONLY SHOWS
YOUR TOTAL BIAS.
She hasn't said she finds them acceptable, she said you brought them on
yourself. When are you going to actually start reading what people write?
You'd probably look a lot less stupid if you did.
SHAME ON YOU for saying these are OK when directed against me.
Where did she say it was OK?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: SHAME ON YOU DANI! Re: First reply to this DANI. Re: Some advice.. |
26 Oct 2004 07:55:28 AM |
|
|
Liar.
J.
tw a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:LC9fd.3899617$6p.650255@news.easynews.com...
Dani a écrit:
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 15:56:45 GMT, "Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"Dani" <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9gmmn0p891haqqoc2ahe52e36kqgrjgi5m@4ax.com...
Dani, thanks for your intercession and all you've said I do
appreciate it.
You're very welcome.
I wonder though if it's worth your risking
your friendship with Jean over something this stupid?
I also appreciate your kindness and your consideration
for what may happen to me in this regard. Maybe I am
too much of a "busy body" and stick my nose where it
doesn't belong sometimes.. but it's really just who I am
and I find it extremely difficult not to voice my opinion
when I see a situation where someone is being unfairly
treated.
Jean and I were close friends at one point in time when I
first joined this group. I honest to God, no word of a lie
tried my hardest to be decent with him in this exchange,
Krib - but he just suggested that I may have "liked" what
Tony did to me. I don't see a friendship anymore after
that statement.
All I said is that what they do to me with their unrelated attacks and
lies about my personal life, is the same was what tony did to you about
yours. The same fucking thing.
Not at all. None of the "lies" you claim me and Kriob throw at you woudl
have been thrown at you at all if it weren't for your overwhelming desire to
smear everyone who disagrees with you or exposes the stupidity of your
arguments as "anti-american" or an "anti-semite". BNoth of which are,
incidentally, lies about private lives.
This is PURE HYPOCRISY
I'm glad you're starting to realise what your problem is.
, and apparently just to kiss up to these losers
Why on EARTH would Dani want to "kiss up" to either me or Krib?`Are you
implying the girl cannot make a standpoint of her own? That she simply says
what she thinks will ingratiate her with other people?! That is not the
impression of Dani I have got over the last 4 years or soo - the impression
I have got is of a strong minded young woman who calls it as she sees it.
and insist that there bringing up personal lives lies about me is
somewhat more acceptable than when Tony did the same to you.
I believe she's saying it's never right, and that you are just as wrong to
do it as anyone else. She's also pointing it out that you brought it on
yourself by choosing this path form teh beginning.
IT IS NOT.
IT NEVER WILL BE. IT WILL ALWAYS BE THE SAME FUCKING THING, AND if the
"MAYBE" is not TRUE, then the same applies to what they do to me.
You reap what you sow, Jean. Bit late to start whining about it now.
The object of the MAYBE is to put you in the context of your disgusting
siding with total weasels who attack personal lives. These personal
lies and attacks on my character from these pieces of ***** to me are the
SAME lowlife attacks as they are from Tony to you. PERIOD.
..and as they are from Jean to me, Krib, Flyfish (/Remeber him?) Barbarossa
etc etc..
For you to find them acceptable in my case and not in yours ONLY SHOWS
YOUR TOTAL BIAS.
She hasn't said she finds them acceptable, she said you brought them on
yourself. When are you going to actually start reading what people write?
You'd probably look a lot less stupid if you did.
SHAME ON YOU for saying these are OK when directed against me.
Where did she say it was OK?
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: SHAME ON YOU DANI! Re: First reply to this DANI. Re: Some advice.. |
26 Oct 2004 08:04:37 AM |
|
|
I like your new sig Jean! Suits you!
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:4Prfd.1858228$yk.306394@news.easynews.com...
Liar.
J.
tw a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:LC9fd.3899617$6p.650255@news.easynews.com...
Dani a écrit:
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 15:56:45 GMT, "Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"Dani" <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9gmmn0p891haqqoc2ahe52e36kqgrjgi5m@4ax.com...
Dani, thanks for your intercession and all you've said I do
appreciate it.
You're very welcome.
I wonder though if it's worth your risking
your friendship with Jean over something this stupid?
I also appreciate your kindness and your consideration
for what may happen to me in this regard. Maybe I am
too much of a "busy body" and stick my nose where it
doesn't belong sometimes.. but it's really just who I am
and I find it extremely difficult not to voice my opinion
when I see a situation where someone is being unfairly
treated.
Jean and I were close friends at one point in time when I
first joined this group. I honest to God, no word of a lie
tried my hardest to be decent with him in this exchange,
Krib - but he just suggested that I may have "liked" what
Tony did to me. I don't see a friendship anymore after
that statement.
All I said is that what they do to me with their unrelated attacks and
lies about my personal life, is the same was what tony did to you about
yours. The same fucking thing.
Not at all. None of the "lies" you claim me and Kriob throw at you woudl
have been thrown at you at all if it weren't for your overwhelming
desire to
smear everyone who disagrees with you or exposes the stupidity of your
arguments as "anti-american" or an "anti-semite". BNoth of which are,
incidentally, lies about private lives.
This is PURE HYPOCRISY
I'm glad you're starting to realise what your problem is.
, and apparently just to kiss up to these losers
Why on EARTH would Dani want to "kiss up" to either me or Krib?`Are you
implying the girl cannot make a standpoint of her own? That she simply
says
what she thinks will ingratiate her with other people?! That is not the
impression of Dani I have got over the last 4 years or soo - the
impression
I have got is of a strong minded young woman who calls it as she sees
it.
and insist that there bringing up personal lives lies about me is
somewhat more acceptable than when Tony did the same to you.
I believe she's saying it's never right, and that you are just as wrong
to
do it as anyone else. She's also pointing it out that you brought it on
yourself by choosing this path form teh beginning.
IT IS NOT.
IT NEVER WILL BE. IT WILL ALWAYS BE THE SAME FUCKING THING, AND if the
"MAYBE" is not TRUE, then the same applies to what they do to me.
You reap what you sow, Jean. Bit late to start whining about it now.
The object of the MAYBE is to put you in the context of your disgusting
siding with total weasels who attack personal lives. These personal
lies and attacks on my character from these pieces of ***** to me are the
SAME lowlife attacks as they are from Tony to you. PERIOD.
..and as they are from Jean to me, Krib, Flyfish (/Remeber him?)
Barbarossa
etc etc..
For you to find them acceptable in my case and not in yours ONLY SHOWS
YOUR TOTAL BIAS.
She hasn't said she finds them acceptable, she said you brought them on
yourself. When are you going to actually start reading what people
write?
You'd probably look a lot less stupid if you did.
SHAME ON YOU for saying these are OK when directed against me.
Where did she say it was OK?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: SHAME ON YOU DANI! Re: First reply to this DANI. Re: Some advice.. |
30 Oct 2004 04:51:53 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:13:31 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
Dani a écrit:
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 15:56:45 GMT, "Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"Dani" <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9gmmn0p891haqqoc2ahe52e36kqgrjgi5m@4ax.com...
Dani, thanks for your intercession and all you've said I do
appreciate it.
You're very welcome.
I wonder though if it's worth your risking
your friendship with Jean over something this stupid?
I also appreciate your kindness and your consideration
for what may happen to me in this regard. Maybe I am
too much of a "busy body" and stick my nose where it
doesn't belong sometimes.. but it's really just who I am
and I find it extremely difficult not to voice my opinion
when I see a situation where someone is being unfairly
treated.
Jean and I were close friends at one point in time when I
first joined this group. I honest to God, no word of a lie
tried my hardest to be decent with him in this exchange,
Krib - but he just suggested that I may have "liked" what
Tony did to me. I don't see a friendship anymore after
that statement.
All I said is that what they do to me with their unrelated attacks and
lies about my personal life, is the same was what tony did to you about
yours. The same fucking thing.
Not the same thing at all.
This is PURE HYPOCRISY, and apparently just to kiss up to these losers
I haven't kissed up to anyone - unlike you, I don't only "side" with
people who share my same political viewpoints. I only address the
person. And in this case you were the one in the wrong.
and insist that there bringing up personal lives lies about me is
somewhat more acceptable than when Tony did the same to you.
But Jean, you made up "personal lives lies" about them.. they merely
retaliated. That's pretty much the same thing that I did to Tony when
he attacked me first. Not to mention that Tony went to sex groups
pretending to be me, leaving my email address (and weird people
started writing) - but yet you're all freaked out that Grantland used
Jane's name when that isn't anywhere *near* what Tony did to me.
Tony did the worst of the worst of the worst possible.. I hardly see
where you can compare Krib and Tom to Tony.
IT IS NOT.
IT NEVER WILL BE. IT WILL ALWAYS BE THE SAME FUCKING THING, AND if the
"MAYBE" is not TRUE, then the same applies to what they do to me.
What's with the tantrum? hehe.
The object of the MAYBE is to put you in the context of your disgusting
siding with total weasels who attack personal lives. These personal
lies and attacks on my character from these pieces of ***** to me are the
SAME lowlife attacks as they are from Tony to you. PERIOD.
This is absolutely nothing like what Tony did to me (for years..)
For you to find them acceptable in my case and not in yours ONLY SHOWS
YOUR TOTAL BIAS.
Actually I was being completely unbiased.
SHAME ON YOU
Somehow I still feel alright ..
for saying these are OK when directed against me.
I never said that. I pointed out that you falsely accused them and
you couldn't admit fault. I stand by what I originally said and feel
no "shame" (lol) over it.
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: SHAME ON YOU DANI! Re: First reply to this DANI. Re: Some advice.. |
30 Oct 2004 07:14:45 AM |
|
|
Dani a écrit:
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:13:31 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
Dani a écrit:
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 15:56:45 GMT, "Krib" <krib@address.invalid> wrote:
"Dani" <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9gmmn0p891haqqoc2ahe52e36kqgrjgi5m@4ax.com...
Dani, thanks for your intercession and all you've said I do
appreciate it.
You're very welcome.
I wonder though if it's worth your risking
your friendship with Jean over something this stupid?
I also appreciate your kindness and your consideration
for what may happen to me in this regard. Maybe I am
too much of a "busy body" and stick my nose where it
doesn't belong sometimes.. but it's really just who I am
and I find it extremely difficult not to voice my opinion
when I see a situation where someone is being unfairly
treated.
Jean and I were close friends at one point in time when I
first joined this group. I honest to God, no word of a lie
tried my hardest to be decent with him in this exchange,
Krib - but he just suggested that I may have "liked" what
Tony did to me. I don't see a friendship anymore after
that statement.
All I said is that what they do to me with their unrelated attacks and
lies about my personal life, is the same was what tony did to you about
yours. The same fucking thing.
Not the same thing at all.
Well, it differs only because you also attack him on a personal level.
This is PURE HYPOCRISY, and apparently just to kiss up to these losers
I haven't kissed up to anyone - unlike you, I don't only "side" with
people who share my same political viewpoints. I only address the
person. And in this case you were the one in the wrong.
Wrong.
and insist that there bringing up personal lives lies about me is
somewhat more acceptable than when Tony did the same to you.
But Jean, you made up "personal lives lies" about them..
Never. I never made up stuff about their personal lives. I speak of
their lies about politics or facts, I don't, go make up stuff about
their personal lives. YOU LIE.
they merely
retaliated.
*****.
That's pretty much the same thing that I did to Tony when
he attacked me first. Not to mention that Tony went to sex groups
pretending to be me, leaving my email address (and weird people
started writing) - but yet you're all freaked out that Grantland used
Jane's name when that isn't anywhere *near* what Tony did to me.
*****. What Tony did compares to what they do. You cannot show where
I pretended anything untrue about their personal lives.
Tony did the worst of the worst of the worst possible.. I hardly see
where you can compare Krib and Tom to Tony.
Tony was doing what you were doing. But unfortunately for him, he
started it first. He was screwed.
Krib and Tom as well do the same *****. NOT ME.
Where did I make up ***** about their personal lives?
IT IS NOT.
IT NEVER WILL BE. IT WILL ALWAYS BE THE SAME FUCKING THING, AND if the
"MAYBE" is not TRUE, then the same applies to what they do to me.
What's with the tantrum? hehe.
The above.
The object of the MAYBE is to put you in the context of your disgusting
siding with total weasels who attack personal lives. These personal
lies and attacks on my character from these pieces of ***** to me are the
SAME lowlife attacks as they are from Tony to you. PERIOD.
This is absolutely nothing like what Tony did to me (for years..)
It is EXACTLY like what Tony did to you for years.
For you to find them acceptable in my case and not in yours ONLY SHOWS
YOUR TOTAL BIAS.
Actually I was being completely unbiased.
SHAME ON YOU
Somehow I still feel alright ..
for saying these are OK when directed against me.
I never said that. I pointed out that you falsely accused them and
you couldn't admit fault. I stand by what I originally said and feel
no "shame" (lol) over it.
Dani
Well, if you insist, then tell me when I made up anything up about their
PERSONAL lives then, since you pretend I did and that they were merely
retaliating.
J.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: First reply to this DANI. Re: Some advice.. |
25 Oct 2004 01:33:50 AM |
|
|
Dani a écrit:
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 15:04:31 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
Dani a écrit:
First of all, both are pieces of *****
They're not pieces of *****. That's yet another label you throw around
too easily.
who make up stuff continually
about my personal lives.
They would not be flaming you if you didn't throw those awful
accusations at them. Krib was decent to you until there was a thread
about Europeans financing terrorism.
Krib mentioned that *some* Americans have also financed terror.
Which is a lie. Anyone who finance terror in the US is arrested.
I guess you didn't read the links I provided:
"Throughout the three decades of conflict in Northern Ireland, those
on both sides have looked to America as one of their greatest
resources.
And why not: There are more than seven times as many Irish-Americans
as there are Irish.
"They've played an important part in the conflict for decades," said
Dr. Seamus Metress, a professor of anthropology at the University of
Toledo and a longtime activist for a united Ireland.
The famous potato famines of 1845 to 1851 reduced the population of
Ireland from 8 million to 4 million. More than 1 million died, and
many of the remainder fled to America.
In the 15 decades since, Ireland's population has struggled back up to
about 5.3 million. In the U.S., 42 million Americans are of Irish
descent, according to the 1990 census.
Irish-Americans have been supporting the republican cause throughout
this century. But beginning with the Irish civil rights movement in
1968 - when images of British soldiers beating Catholics with batons
made their way onto the nightly news - more and more Americans decided
to get involved.
Some raised money for human rights organizations and wrote articles
about the crisis. Others went further, and shipped arms and money to
groups such as the Irish Republican Army. A 1973 FBI report stated
that the Irish conflict had been largely paid for with American
dollars; that trend has continued throughout the bloody times since."
http://www.clipfile.org/clips/000379.php
..................................................................................................................
"Boston's large and influential Irish community is divided on the
merits of the IRA's decommissioning announcement.
"It's good and bad," said an Irish-American taxi-driver.
Let's hope it lasts
Boston bar part-owner Dereck Leonard:
"Good to get the weapons out of action but bad that the English are
staying."
The city is full of Irish pubs and there is a city centre monument to
the 1840s famine, which forced millions of starving Irish to come and
settle in the United States, while the local basketball team is called
the Celtics.
There are several organisations here which raise funds for the
Republican movement, some of which is allegedly used to buy weapons
for the IRA."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/1616455.stm
.........................................................................................................
"Building the Movement in America
In short the Movement in America needs to be rebuilt, "anew", from
scratch, as the primary thrust of support for Americans and Irish
Americans was from groups associated to the Provisional Movement now
"Ex- Republican Movement".
In America this support primarily came from the Provisional controlled
Irish Northern Aid Committee (Noraid) which for many years supported
the families and dependents of Irish Republican Prisoners and has
helped to raise a high level of awareness in not only America but
elsewhere around the world to the conflict in Ireland and Britain's
war and involvement in Ireland."
http://free.freespeech.org/IRWAC/building_RM_Amer_1.htm
Well, since 9-11, and Bush taking charge, no terrorist organization or
their supporter is immune.
Well you flew off the handle and called him anti-American and a
terrorist supporter for that.
Well this was about European countries and he really said that Americans
support terror (there is NO "some" - read what I reply not the ***** he
writes), and in context it was about the country. Read the context.
He was talking specifically about NORAID - hence he meant *some*
And he didn't specify and I was talking about the EU.
As for the terrorism, it is obvious also that the following in the posts
he pretended that the content of the jihadists site I showed him
addressed jihad only as struggle which was a total lie. In that context
he was playing the card of the terrorists.
Krib:
"Jihad translates literally as struggle so it depends on ones
viewpoint"
How is that a "lie" - and how is that "playing the card
of terrorists"? He was simply giving you the *definition* of Jihad.
That's all, Jean.
He was commenting on the link I had provided, taking one word out of
context and ignoring all the others.
Well guess what, unfortunately in
Boston, there is a large Irish community here (Southie) and some
*have* financed the IRA. Now I'm an American as you know, does
my admitting that fact also make me anti-American and a terrorist
supporter?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/1616455.stm
http://free.freespeech.org/IRWAC/building_RM_Amer_1.htm
http://www.clipfile.org/clips/000379.php
..that's just a few.
Well, if they do, you can have them arrested.
Above you say it's a lie that Americans have financed terror; now
you're talking about them getting arrested. Anyway, yes, of course
they would be arrested if caught.
Thank you very much.
So if that was true, he should denounce them to the FBI right and they
would cease to exist?
Hence it is not true unless he is an silent accomplice.
There is no tolerance for any form of terrorism support in the US,
especially since 9-11.
Of course.
Does anyone lie about your personal life now
that Tony is not there? Don't you know what this is like?
Yes of course I know what that is like, but the difference here is
that I didn't *start* it with Tony. I merely defended myself. And
sorry to say, Jean - that's exactly what Krib and Tom are doing.. they
are defending themselves from your accusations.
*****, if they would do that they wouldn't start with lies about my
personal life which has nothing to do with their lies.
You've shared some of your personal life here which is why they use it
in retaliation to your accusations against them. But they didn't do
that until *after* they were falsely accused by you.
Not falsely. BUT YES. Exactly. NOTHING false about my personal life has
anything to do on this NG. PERIOD.
This is totally UNTRUE. Personal lives have NOTHING to do on THIS NG
whether it be Tony or these total losers.
Slander and false accusations also have nothing to do on this group.
Well, accusations are based on statements about politics.
PERSONAL LIVES DO NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO DO IN THESE DISCUSSIONS, PERIOD.
Maybe you liked being branded a ***** or whatever he called you all the
time by Tony? Maybe you think it has something to do with any political
discussion?
Well IT DOESN'T.
These assholes keep making up this stuff even when debunked to the bone
on every allegation, they wallow in lies. Most of their posts, and I
mean 95%, are only here to pick a fight with me. Make a check on google
on all of this year's posts.
..like I said - it didn't start until after they were falsely accused.
*****,. I don't falsely accuse. it is based on statements. And HAS
NOTHING TO DO WITH PERSONAL LIVES. PERIOD.
GET THAT IN YOUR HEAD ONCE AND FOR ALL.
IF THEY WANT TO REFUTE the accusation, they are free to address them and
correct their lies. IT STILL HAS NOTHING AND WILL NEVER HAVE NOTHING TO
DO WITH FREAKING PERSONAL LIVES.
GET THAT DANI???
J.
Me I can't go on read this unfairness coming from you. Wallow all you
want with these losers, it remains a FACT that personal lives have
nothing to do with discussion about their fucking political lies and
opinions. PERIOD.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: First reply to this DANI. Re: Some advice.. |
25 Oct 2004 03:54:48 AM |
|
|
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:i71fd.3290615$ic1.335913@news.easynews.com...
Dani a écrit:
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 15:04:31 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
Dani a écrit:
<snip>
Yes of course I know what that is like, but the difference here is
that I didn't *start* it with Tony. I merely defended myself. And
sorry to say, Jean - that's exactly what Krib and Tom are doing.. they
are defending themselves from your accusations.
*****, if they would do that they wouldn't start with lies about my
personal life which has nothing to do with their lies.
You've shared some of your personal life here which is why they use it
in retaliation to your accusations against them. But they didn't do
that until *after* they were falsely accused by you.
Not falsely. BUT YES. Exactly. NOTHING false about my personal life has
anything to do on this NG. PERIOD.
You attacked Barbarossa about what him and his girlfriend get up to - surely
that's his personal life, hypocrite?
<snip>
*****,. I don't falsely accuse. it is based on statements. And HAS
NOTHING TO DO WITH PERSONAL LIVES. PERIOD.
GET THAT IN YOUR HEAD ONCE AND FOR ALL.
IF THEY WANT TO REFUTE the accusation, they are free to address them and
correct their lies.
No Jean, if YOU want to MAKE these accusations then you have to back them up
in a manner that convinces other people. That is the essence of argument,
you see.
IT STILL HAS NOTHING AND WILL NEVER HAVE NOTHING TO
DO WITH FREAKING PERSONAL LIVES.
Accusing people of anti-semitism is very much to do with someone's private
life.
GET THAT DANI???
Calm down, kook
J.
Me I can't go on read this unfairness coming from you.
How old are you Guernon? 4? 5? That's usually the age people are when the
whine about "unfairness" when they get caught misbehaving.
Wallow all you want with these losers, it remains a FACT that personal
lives have
nothing to do with discussion
So when are you going to apologise to at least Barbarossa then, hypocrite?
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=rimming&hl=en&lr=&group=alt.prophecies.nos
tradamus&scoring=d&selm=Orgdd.21197%24cr4.14533%40edtnps84&rnum=1
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: First reply to this DANI. Re: Some advice.. |
25 Oct 2004 11:15:22 AM |
|
|
Not in the context of discussing it, disgusting *****.
Go wallow in your fartitude anti-semite loser.
J.
tw a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:i71fd.3290615$ic1.335913@news.easynews.com...
Dani a écrit:
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 15:04:31 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
Dani a écrit:
<snip>
Yes of course I know what that is like, but the difference here is
that I didn't *start* it with Tony. I merely defended myself. And
sorry to say, Jean - that's exactly what Krib and Tom are doing.. they
are defending themselves from your accusations.
*****, if they would do that they wouldn't start with lies about my
personal life which has nothing to do with their lies.
You've shared some of your personal life here which is why they use it
in retaliation to your accusations against them. But they didn't do
that until *after* they were falsely accused by you.
Not falsely. BUT YES. Exactly. NOTHING false about my personal life has
anything to do on this NG. PERIOD.
You attacked Barbarossa about what him and his girlfriend get up to - surely
that's his personal life, hypocrite?
<snip>
*****,. I don't falsely accuse. it is based on statements. And HAS
NOTHING TO DO WITH PERSONAL LIVES. PERIOD.
GET THAT IN YOUR HEAD ONCE AND FOR ALL.
IF THEY WANT TO REFUTE the accusation, they are free to address them and
correct their lies.
No Jean, if YOU want to MAKE these accusations then you have to back them up
in a manner that convinces other people. That is the essence of argument,
you see.
IT STILL HAS NOTHING AND WILL NEVER HAVE NOTHING TO
DO WITH FREAKING PERSONAL LIVES.
Accusing people of anti-semitism is very much to do with someone's private
life.
GET THAT DANI???
Calm down, kook
J.
Me I can't go on read this unfairness coming from you.
How old are you Guernon? 4? 5? That's usually the age people are when the
whine about "unfairness" when they get caught misbehaving.
Wallow all you want with these losers, it remains a FACT that personal
lives have
nothing to do with discussion
So when are you going to apologise to at least Barbarossa then, hypocrite?
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=rimming&hl=en&lr=&group=alt.prophecies.nos
tradamus&scoring=d&selm=Orgdd.21197%24cr4.14533%40edtnps84&rnum=1
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: First reply to this DANI. Re: Some advice.. |
26 Oct 2004 03:12:47 AM |
|
|
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:uE9fd.3308115$ic1.337173@news.easynews.com...
Not in the context of discussing it, disgusting *****.
LOL! So you modify your statements yet again when you realise they condemn
you too.
Go wallow in your fartitude anti-semite loser.
You pathetic old liar.
J.
tw a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:i71fd.3290615$ic1.335913@news.easynews.com...
Dani a écrit:
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 15:04:31 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
Dani a écrit:
<snip>
Yes of course I know what that is like, but the difference here is
that I didn't *start* it with Tony. I merely defended myself. And
sorry to say, Jean - that's exactly what Krib and Tom are doing..
they
are defending themselves from your accusations.
*****, if they would do that they wouldn't start with lies about my
personal life which has nothing to do with their lies.
You've shared some of your personal life here which is why they use it
in retaliation to your accusations against them. But they didn't do
that until *after* they were falsely accused by you.
Not falsely. BUT YES. Exactly. NOTHING false about my personal life has
anything to do on this NG. PERIOD.
You attacked Barbarossa about what him and his girlfriend get up to -
surely
that's his personal life, hypocrite?
<snip>
*****,. I don't falsely accuse. it is based on statements. And HAS
NOTHING TO DO WITH PERSONAL LIVES. PERIOD.
GET THAT IN YOUR HEAD ONCE AND FOR ALL.
IF THEY WANT TO REFUTE the accusation, they are free to address them and
correct their lies.
No Jean, if YOU want to MAKE these accusations then you have to back
them up
in a manner that convinces other people. That is the essence of
argument,
you see.
IT STILL HAS NOTHING AND WILL NEVER HAVE NOTHING TO
DO WITH FREAKING PERSONAL LIVES.
Accusing people of anti-semitism is very much to do with someone's
private
life.
GET THAT DANI???
Calm down, kook
J.
Me I can't go on read this unfairness coming from you.
How old are you Guernon? 4? 5? That's usually the age people are when
the
whine about "unfairness" when they get caught misbehaving.
Wallow all you want with these losers, it remains a FACT that personal
lives have
nothing to do with discussion
So when are you going to apologise to at least Barbarossa then,
hypocrite?
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=rimming&hl=en&lr=&group=alt.prophecies.nos
tradamus&scoring=d&selm=Orgdd.21197%24cr4.14533%40edtnps84&rnum=1
.
|
|
|
| User: "Barbarossa" |
|
| Title: Re: First reply to this DANI. Re: Some advice.. |
29 Oct 2004 09:29:09 AM |
|
|
"tw" <no@no.com> schreef in bericht
news:cll0n3$1o1$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:uE9fd.3308115$ic1.337173@news.easynews.com...
Not in the context of discussing it, disgusting *****.
LOL! So you modify your statements yet again when you realise they condemn
you too.
Go wallow in your fartitude anti-semite loser.
You pathetic old liar.
J.
tw a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:i71fd.3290615$ic1.335913@news.easynews.com...
Dani a écrit:
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 15:04:31 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
Dani a écrit:
<snip>
Yes of course I know what that is like, but the difference here is
that I didn't *start* it with Tony. I merely defended myself. And
sorry to say, Jean - that's exactly what Krib and Tom are doing..
they
are defending themselves from your accusations.
*****, if they would do that they wouldn't start with lies about
my
personal life which has nothing to do with their lies.
You've shared some of your personal life here which is why they use
it
in retaliation to your accusations against them. But they didn't do
that until *after* they were falsely accused by you.
Not falsely. BUT YES. Exactly. NOTHING false about my personal life
has
anything to do on this NG. PERIOD.
You attacked Barbarossa about what him and his girlfriend get up to -
surely
that's his personal life, hypocrite?
<snip>
*****,. I don't falsely accuse. it is based on statements. And HAS
NOTHING TO DO WITH PERSONAL LIVES. PERIOD.
GET THAT IN YOUR HEAD ONCE AND FOR ALL.
IF THEY WANT TO REFUTE the accusation, they are free to address them
and
correct their lies.
No Jean, if YOU want to MAKE these accusations then you have to back
them up
in a manner that convinces other people. That is the essence of
argument,
you see.
IT STILL HAS NOTHING AND WILL NEVER HAVE NOTHING TO
DO WITH FREAKING PERSONAL LIVES.
Accusing people of anti-semitism is very much to do with someone's
private
life.
GET THAT DANI???
Calm down, kook
J.
Me I can't go on read this unfairness coming from you.
How old are you Guernon? 4? 5? That's usually the age people are when
the
whine about "unfairness" when they get caught misbehaving.
Wallow all you want with these losers, it remains a FACT that
personal
lives have
nothing to do with discussion
So when are you going to apologise to at least Barbarossa then,
hypocrite?
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=rimming&hl=en&lr=&group=alt.prophecies.nos
tradamus&scoring=d&selm=Orgdd.21197%24cr4.14533%40edtnps84&rnum=1
Thanks! But there is more as well. He claimed that I had stopped smoking in
this
NG. I never informed him about whether I smoke or not smoke. I consider such
none of his business. So, JG claims that he does not make up things about
posters'
personal life, yet he does it anyway. Same applies to his weird view that I
am an
anti-american. I am against American government. I have nothing against
innocent
unarmed American civillians. Same applies to his statement that I am an
antisemite.
I have never been an antisemite. He doesn't even know what an antisemite is.
Kind Regards,
Barbarossa
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: First reply to this DANI. Re: Some advice.. |
29 Oct 2004 01:42:57 PM |
|
|
Barbarossa a écrit:
"tw" <no@no.com> schreef in bericht
news:cll0n3$1o1$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:uE9fd.3308115$ic1.337173@news.easynews.com...
Not in the context of discussing it, disgusting *****.
LOL! So you modify your statements yet again when you realise they condemn
you too.
Go wallow in your fartitude anti-semite loser.
You pathetic old liar.
J.
tw a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:i71fd.3290615$ic1.335913@news.easynews.com...
Dani a écrit:
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 15:04:31 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
Dani a écrit:
<snip>
Yes of course I know what that is like, but the difference here is
that I didn't *start* it with Tony. I merely defended myself. And
sorry to say, Jean - that's exactly what Krib and Tom are doing..
they
are defending themselves from your accusations.
*****, if they would do that they wouldn't start with lies about
my
personal life which has nothing to do with their lies.
You've shared some of your personal life here which is why they use
it
in retaliation to your accusations against them. But they didn't do
that until *after* they were falsely accused by you.
Not falsely. BUT YES. Exactly. NOTHING false about my personal life
has
anything to do on this NG. PERIOD.
You attacked Barbarossa about what him and his girlfriend get up to -
surely
that's his personal life, hypocrite?
<snip>
*****,. I don't falsely accuse. it is based on statements. And HAS
NOTHING TO DO WITH PERSONAL LIVES. PERIOD.
GET THAT IN YOUR HEAD ONCE AND FOR ALL.
IF THEY WANT TO REFUTE the accusation, they are free to address them
and
correct their lies.
No Jean, if YOU want to MAKE these accusations then you have to back
them up
in a manner that convinces other people. That is the essence of
argument,
you see.
IT STILL HAS NOTHING AND WILL NEVER HAVE NOTHING TO
DO WITH FREAKING PERSONAL LIVES.
Accusing people of anti-semitism is very much to do with someone's
private
life.
GET THAT DANI???
Calm down, kook
J.
Me I can't go on read this unfairness coming from you.
How old are you Guernon? 4? 5? That's usually the age people are when
the
whine about "unfairness" when they get caught misbehaving.
Wallow all you want with these losers, it remains a FACT that
personal
lives have
nothing to do with discussion
So when are you going to apologise to at least Barbarossa then,
hypocrite?
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=rimming&hl=en&lr=&group=alt.prophecies.nos
tradamus&scoring=d&selm=Orgdd.21197%24cr4.14533%40edtnps84&rnum=1
Thanks! But there is more as well. He claimed that I had stopped smoking in
this
NG.
I apologized for speaking about Marvin here. But you come back with that
*****. Thus the question remains, did you or didn't you?
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: First reply to this DANI. Re: Some advice.. |
05 Nov 2004 08:45:31 AM |
|
|
Wow, just got around to sifting thru this thread and I see that Dani did
another meltdown, this time on Jean, turning around to stab him in the back
after all of the times he supported her.
I guess the girl just has to have someone to attack, it's been her MO since she
entered this group.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: First reply to this DANI. Re: Some advice.. |
05 Nov 2004 04:05:44 PM |
|
|
I wouldn't exactly say that since her intervention really allowed
questions to be asked and not answered, about the one side unilateral
calumnies about personal lives, which apparently has led since to a stop
to personal attacks which is great since it was really the lamest things
here. You must look at the result, no matter how many times I would by
myself address this with the same arguments, I would get nowhere. It was
very useful to have a "hard talk", in fact, even if it may seem totally
differently to you.
But I know you two are enemies, so I wouldn't expect you to speak about
success, even if you cannot look at the results that would make the
point that needed to be made, since it is not in writing and it is
obvious that if you had seen the positive outcome of the brawl, you
wouldn't have commented. You saw only the "difficult" part of course.
If you look at posts since, you will see that there was something done
there in my case by some kind of special touch I guess, even if
obviously non-verbal.
Unfortunately, there is nothing I can do about your mutual enmity. I
don't know if there is a solution, it seems that you two will always
have issues. You both have strong Italian roots, and Italians are very
passionate in both love or hate.
It may be that you started on the wrong foot, that you have opposite
characters, that you have fundamental incompatibility, which adds to the
fact that you have a totally different ideology. There will always be
something between you two, IMO, ever since the first spark...
J.
TonyZ2001 a écrit:
Wow, just got around to sifting thru this thread and I see that Dani did
another meltdown, this time on Jean, turning around to stab him in the back
after all of the times he supported her.
I guess the girl just has to have someone to attack, it's been her MO since she
entered this group.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: First reply to this DANI. Re: Some advice.. |
07 Nov 2004 06:24:27 AM |
|
|
Jean Guernon
wrote:
I wouldn't exactly say that since her intervention really allowed
questions to be asked and not answered, about the one side unilateral
calumnies about personal lives, which apparently has led since to a stop
to personal attacks which is great since it was really the lamest things
here. You must look at the result, no matter how many times I would by
myself address this with the same arguments, I would get nowhere. It was
very useful to have a "hard talk", in fact, even if it may seem totally
differently to you.
Useful in what way? Her last post to you on this subject had her telling you
how wrong you were and sticking up for the lowlifes in this group.
It also included a few contradictions and lies.
Need I repost it and point them out to you?
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: First reply to this DANI. Re: Some advice.. |
08 Nov 2004 04:34:41 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041107072427.15969.00000151@mb-m02.aol.com...
Jean Guernon
wrote:
I wouldn't exactly say that since her intervention really allowed
questions to be asked and not answered, about the one side unilateral
calumnies about personal lives, which apparently has led since to a stop
to personal attacks which is great since it was really the lamest things
here. You must look at the result, no matter how many times I would by
myself address this with the same arguments, I would get nowhere. It was
very useful to have a "hard talk", in fact, even if it may seem totally
differently to you.
Useful in what way? Her last post to you on this subject had her telling
you
how wrong you were and sticking up for the lowlifes in this group.
No she was sticking up for the truth, and trying to show Jean that he
woudln't get hassle from Krib or me if he wasn't such a fucking liar - or do
YOU want to try and find a post where I express an anti-semitic statment,
pantyboy?
It also included a few contradictions and lies.
Need I repost it and point them out to you?
Tony
LOL! Go for it, you pencil necked son of a polish *****.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: First reply to this DANI. Re: Some advice.. |
07 Nov 2004 02:51:33 PM |
|
|
Tony, I have told you for years to keep away from her, and you want to
be meddling with our posts now? Keep out of that. You're the last one
who could do anything positive about his.
Doesn't mean you cannot do something about everything else. But just
don't even think about this.
J.
TonyZ2001 a écrit:
Jean Guernon
wrote:
I wouldn't exactly say that since her intervention really allowed
questions to be asked and not answered, about the one side unilateral
calumnies about personal lives, which apparently has led since to a stop
to personal attacks which is great since it was really the lamest things
here. You must look at the result, no matter how many times I would by
myself address this with the same arguments, I would get nowhere. It was
very useful to have a "hard talk", in fact, even if it may seem totally
differently to you.
Useful in what way? Her last post to you on this subject had her telling you
how wrong you were and sticking up for the lowlifes in this group.
It also included a few contradictions and lies.
Need I repost it and point them out to you?
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: First reply to this DANI. Re: Some advice.. |
08 Nov 2004 07:15:41 AM |
|
|
Jean Guernon
wrote:
Tony, I have told you for years to keep >away from her, and you want to
be meddling with our posts now? Keep >out of that.
Wow, you've got some nerve, have you forgotten how you entwined yourself in my
disputes with Dani?
Face the fact of what she is, and not what you wish her to be, she stabbed you
in the back, made an attempt to humilate you, called you all kinds of names,
etc.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: First reply to this DANI. Re: Some advice.. |
08 Nov 2004 07:28:00 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041108081541.09736.00000121@mb-m20.aol.com...
Jean Guernon
wrote:
Tony, I have told you for years to keep >away from her, and you want to
be meddling with our posts now? Keep >out of that.
Wow, you've got some nerve, have you forgotten how you entwined yourself
in my
disputes with Dani?
Face the fact of what she is, and not what you wish her to be, she stabbed
you
in the back
No she didn't. she tried to HELP him.
, made an attempt to humilate you, called you all kinds of names,
You're such a transparent arsehole, pusher-boy...
etc.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: First reply to this DANI. Re: Some advice.. |
09 Nov 2004 07:42:47 AM |
|
|
"tw"
wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041108081541.09736.00000121@mb-m20.aol.com...
Jean Guernon
wrote:
Tony, I have told you for years to keep >away from her, and you want to
be meddling with our posts now? Keep >out of that.
Wow, you've got some nerve, have you forgotten how you entwined yourself
in my
disputes with Dani?
Face the fact of what she is, and not what you wish her to be, she stabbed
you
in the back
No she didn't. she tried to HELP him.
LOL!!!
Yeah, by stabbing him in the back.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: First reply to this DANI. Re: Some advice.. |
09 Nov 2004 07:55:31 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041109084247.12394.00000438@mb-m28.aol.com...
"tw"
wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041108081541.09736.00000121@mb-m20.aol.com...
Jean Guernon
wrote:
Tony, I have told you for years to keep >away from her, and you want
to
be meddling with our posts now? Keep >out of that.
Wow, you've got some nerve, have you forgotten how you entwined
yourself
in my
disputes with Dani?
Face the fact of what she is, and not what you wish her to be, she
stabbed
you
in the back
No she didn't. she tried to HELP him.
LOL!!!
ROFLOL!
Yeah, by stabbing him in the back.
No, by telling the truth and very respectfully trying to explain to him why
he was getting so much abuse and suggesting possible solutions. It was
conciliatory in the extreme.
Here, have a read of it - you'd have to be a particularly thin-skinned
individual with crushingly low self esteem and steroid-induced paranoia to
see it as a "stab in the back":
"Dani" <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:t38hn0l8616mlgot0udnbok5rolbc68bqo@4ax.com
Jean,
You might not like what I have to say, but after just looking over
this group, I feel it needs to be said for your own good.
You throw the "anti-semite" and "terrorist supporter" accusations
around way too often and easily. You have called Krib criminally
insane and an anti-American - you've called Tom an anti-semite
over and over but yet you're unable to produce even one post of his
that is anti-semitic. Also.. why do you think he would be fighting
this accusation so hard if he really is an anti-semite? If he was
one, it would be evident. You've obviously offended him to the
point where he's not going to let this go.
And Krib.. he's most certainly not an anti-American. He's travelled
here, and he told me that he thought Boston was great and the people
were great. He's also said in the past that he has love for America.
So again, like with Tom, I'm sure Krib is offended by that accusation
which is why you are getting so much flack on this group. You can't
expect to throw those accusations out so easily without retribution.
I also remember Krib saying once (before this happened between you
guys) that he liked you even though he's been told by you that he has
"wallowed in fartitude" ..
The point is you throw these accusations around way too easily. When
you're constantly accusing people of it - your words lose conviction
and begin to fall upon deaf ears.. hence you're doing yourself a
disservice because when you come across a *real* anti-semite,
anti-American terrorist supporter - people will think: "Oh there's
Jean shouting anti-semitism and anti-Americanism again!"
Tom isn't an anti-semite, Jean.. and Krib is not anti-American.
It takes a strong man to admit when he is wrong. And it's always
respected and admired when he does.
Maybe you can try?
Dani
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: First reply to this DANI. Re: Some advice.. |
08 Nov 2004 12:08:11 PM |
|
|
tw a écrit:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041108081541.09736.00000121@mb-m20.aol.com...
Jean Guernon
wrote:
Tony, I have told you for years to keep >away from her, and you want to
be meddling with our posts now? Keep >out of that.
Wow, you've got some nerve, have you forgotten how you entwined yourself
in my
disputes with Dani?
Face the fact of what she is, and not what you wish her to be, she stabbed
you
in the back
No she didn't. she tried to HELP him.
It worked for a while as she can't really address the FACT that you two
assholes have never been attacked on a personal level even though you
two keep making up lies about mine, but you two losers just contradict
her contribution,
You and krib two assholes trolls are back with your lies about my
personal life so she is not that good after all. You two make her
irrelevant and never addressed the core issue. That you are little *****
that can only stoop to lies about personal lives unlike anyone else here.
You two are the used toilet paper that need to be flushed from this NG.
You have never contributed anything here anyway, just attack on
legitimate posters and lies about the US and in Israel and about
legitimate posters, with your butt buddy krib. Why don't you both go
drown yourself?
By doing so, you would at least have made one useful contribution to
society.
J.
, made an attempt to humilate you, called you all kinds of names,
You're such a transparent arsehole, pusher-boy...
etc.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: First reply to this DANI. Re: Some advice.. |
09 Nov 2004 02:02:43 AM |
|
|
"Jean Guernon" <> wrote in message
news:fCOjd.4708426$6p.771934@news.easynews.com...
tw a écrit:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041108081541.09736.00000121@mb-m20.aol.com...
Jean Guernon
wrote:
Tony, I have told you for years to keep >away from her, and you want to
be meddling with our posts now? Keep >out of that.
Wow, you've got some nerve, have you forgotten how you entwined yourself
in my
disputes with Dani?
Face the fact of what she is, and not what you wish her to be, she
stabbed
you
in the back
No she didn't. she tried to HELP him.
It worked for a while as she can't really address the FACT that you two
assholes have never been attacked on a personal level
Being accused of anti-semitism IS an attack on a personal level, dope.
even though you
two keep making up lies about mine,
It is not a lie that you chickened out of vietnam and have a criminal record
for drug abuse, dope.
but you two losers just contradict
her contribution,
In English please, dope.
<snip idiotic bleating>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: First reply to this DANI. Re: Some advice.. |
12 Nov 2004 04:20:18 AM |
|
|
tw a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" < > wrote in message
news:fCOjd.4708426$6p.771934@news.easynews.com...
tw a écrit:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041108081541.09736.00000121@mb-m20.aol.com...
Jean Guernon
wrote:
Tony, I have told you for years to keep >away from her, and you want to
be meddling with our posts now? Keep >out of that.
Wow, you've got some nerve, have you forgotten how you entwined yourself
in my
disputes with Dani?
Face the fact of what she is, and not what you wish her to be, she
stabbed
you
in the back
No she didn't. she tried to HELP him.
It worked for a while as she can't really address the FACT that you two
assholes have never been attacked on a personal level
Being accused of anti-semitism IS an attack on a personal level, dope.
Nope. It is an statement about what you say on the NG, not about your
personal life, DOPE.
Wallow in your closet anti-semitism all you want, *****, still has
nothing to do with your personal life.
You are too fucked up to see the difference, it is not my fault.
J.
even though you
two keep making up lies about mine,
It is not a lie that you chickened out of vietnam and have a criminal record
for drug abuse, dope.
but you two losers just contradict
her contribution,
In English please, dope.
<snip idiotic bleating>
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: First reply to this DANI. Re: Some advice.. |
15 Nov 2004 03:24:33 AM |
|
|
"Jean Guernon" <> wrote in message
news:C70ld.4318203$ic1.416620@news.easynews.com...
tw a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" < > wrote in message
news:fCOjd.4708426$6p.771934@news.easynews.com...
tw a écrit:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041108081541.09736.00000121@mb-m20.aol.com...
Jean Guernon
wrote:
Tony, I have told you for years to keep >away from her, and you want
to
be meddling with our posts now? Keep >out of that.
Wow, you've got some nerve, have you forgotten how you entwined
yourself
in my
disputes with Dani?
Face the fact of what she is, and not what you wish her to be, she
stabbed
you
in the back
No she didn't. she tried to HELP him.
It worked for a while as she can't really address the FACT that you two
assholes have never been attacked on a personal level
Being accused of anti-semitism IS an attack on a personal level, dope.
Nope.
YEP
It is an statement about what you say on the NG, not about your
personal life, DOPE.
Ah ha.. well, seeing as you mentioned your criminal record, your drug abuse
and you cowardly running away from teh Marines on this newsgroup, then when
I call you a cowardly druggy criminal I am making statements about what you
say on this newsgroup, Unlike you, with your lies about "anti-semtism" and
"anti-americanism" my barbs are actually based in facts you have revealed
yourself.
Wallow in your closet anti-semitism
LOL! So, because everyody else has told you you have no grounds for calling
me anti-semitic you try to weasel your way out by calling it "closet
anti-semitism"?! "imaginary anti-semitism" woudl be more accurate.
all you want, *****, still has
nothing to do with your personal life.
It most certainly IS to do with my personal life, dope.
You are too fucked up to see the difference, it is not my fault.
How can you call ANYONE fucked up after the revelations about you and a FOUR
YEAR OLD GIRL?!
J.
even though you
two keep making up lies about mine,
It is not a lie that you chickened out of vietnam and have a criminal
record
for drug abuse, dope.
but you two losers just contradict
her contribution,
In English please, dope.
<snip idiotic bleating>
.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
