This comes from Bro. Jon Daily News Digest, today's edition.

DEAD BABIES IN QANA – THE CIA CONNECTION
~~~~~ What the News Media Never Told You and Why ~~~~~


Last Sunday July 30, 2006 , according to news reports, Israeli jets struck
and killed 56 innocent people, mostly children. That's according to
mainstream news media reports in the last four days, so be careful. The
actual facts are far different, and there is something wrong with the news
media reports.

It became apparent by Monday, that the Israeli attack on the Hezbollah
Katyusha rocket launcher truck was about 400 yards away from the collapsed
building where all the bodies were. That's the distance of four football
fields. The Israeli air attack took place about 12:00 midnight. The Israeli
pilot camera videos show the truck was destroyed and that no missiles hit
the 3-story building, supposedly filled with people. Other overhead photos
show the top of the building still intact long after midnight.

But news reports, seemingly directed by Hezbollah, report that at 7:30 am,
an hour after dawn, when it was light outside, the building collapsed
according to numerous news service videos showing the collapsed building.
The collapse of the building, was said by witnesses on the scene and
reported on the news videos as due to missiles from the Israeli jets. But
the Israeli attack was over seven hours before, and no planes were in the
area after that. Is something beginning to look strange here?

Then late Sunday, an observer in Britain, copied the live video of bodies
being carried from the collapsed building and he took still-frame shots out
of the videos. The videos had the live time-stamp showing when the video was
taken. The British observer posted to his website the photos of a young
girl bei ng put into an ambulance at 7:30 am. Two and a half hours later at
10:00am a picture of that same girl is shown being put into another
ambulance. And then 45 minutes later that same girl is shown being carried
out of the rubble by a man with no ambulances around. Is someone trying to
pull a fast one here?

The news reports still continue today that Israeli jets killed 56 in Qana,
but the actual body count by observers on the ground only find 27 bodies,
not 56. Could this difference in numbers be due to the same bodies being
carried out, in front of the video news cameras, two or three times? It's
been done before. Example of something similar; several years ago news
reports showed the results of Israeli bombings in Gaza. The Arab news
services showed in live real time, the funeral crowd carrying a dead body on
a litter. The crowd got rambunctious and the body fell off the litter. So
the “dead body” got up and jumped back on the litter. I saw it with my own
eyes, live. But for the American news media, that part with the “dead body”
getting back on the litter was clipped out. Are the Arabic TV services just
good at propaganda, or are the American and western news services just slow
on the uptake and can't figure out that they have been conned? Let's
continue.

On Tuesday a number of observers around the world watched the taped videos
and noticed something “wrong” with the dead bodies. They were too dead.
Meaning they were stiff as a board. Rigor mortis had set in. Meaning the
bodies had been dead long before the Israeli jet attack at midnight, and
certainly long before the collapse of the building in Qana at 7:30 am. So
those people didn't die from Israeli jets nor from collapsing buildings.
Where did they come from? Some researchers figure they may have come out the
back door of the nearby hospital at Tyre and were then trucked to the
building in Qana. So obviously this was a massive staged media event. But
why?

Remember last week, I reported on the Hezbollah game with the Zelzal
missiles parked in the fenced-in area in Syria, and then the launch trucks
drive through the gate into Lebanon, launch their missiles then drive back
across the fence to Syria. This was supposed to force Israeli pilots to
chase the launch trucks back into Syria and then Syria would be drawn into
the war, because Syrian territory was being attacked by Israeli pilots. This
was the same provocation technique done last week, when Hezbollah soldiers
parked their rocket launch trucks under the UN observer outpost, forcing the
Israeli pilots to attack the outpost, killing four UN observers, but the
blame was placed on Israel not Hezbollah. The news media got it backwards,
and still does. Why?

OK, so if I got the story about the Hezbollah Zelzal game to bring Syria
into the war, then you can assume that Israeli intelligence also had that
same story. Meaning that the Israeli/Lebanese border right next to Syria
was under continuous observation from Israeli pilots, so that the Zelzals
could be destroyed right at launch on the Lebanese side of the border before
they can scoot back to Syria, and then Syria has no excuse for entering the
war.

The only way Hezbollah could play the Zelzal missile trick from Syria is to
halt the Israeli planes from flying overhead. But how to do that? That was
the Sunday media event in Qana. All the front pages around the world and all
TV news outlets carried the horrible visual story of Israel killing 56
innocent children in Qana. As a result, Israel announced a 48 hour bombing
halt, to allow all civilians to escape from the war zone in southern
Lebanon. But if you notice, that Israeli bombing halt only lasted about 48
seconds not hours, especially along the border with Syria. The result was no
Zelzals came through the fence to play the terror game to get Syria into the
war. Instead of missiles, on Monday and Tuesday, Hezbollah launched their
largest Iranian rockets, the FR-5 modified to go about 140 miles. That's not
far enough to make it to Tel Aviv or Jerusalem, but it was farther than
Haifa.

So the event with the “stiff” bodies in Qana, was a staged event, but not
just for propaganda value, but simply a war strategy to get Israel to call a
bombing halt, so Hezbollah could play the Zelzal game. But the strategy
didn't work since Israel did not halt the bombing along the Syrian border,
only in the rest of the war zone. Hezbollah had failed in their military
ploy to play the Zelzal trick, by using the “dead” bodies in Qana.

All of this is a very interesting reporting of events as seen through the
fog of war. What gets first reported in the media is not always what
actually happened. But the much bigger story is why does the American
mainstream news media, almost a week after the event still report that
Israeli jets killed 56 innocent children in Qana? On Tuesday, when
confronted with the facts listed above, some of the American news executives
still insist that it was all Israel's fault. Why? And the executives claim
that researchers on the Internet have no right to question the news
authority of the likes of ABC, AP, New York Times and UPI. OH really?

Maybe your assumption is wrong that the American news media, on your TV or
newspaper, is independent and objective. The BroJon Gazette has been for
years telling you that the news media is carefully and closely controlled by
a single outside source. At the top of this page is the quote which tells
the source. “We'll know our disinformation program is complete when
everything the American public believes is false.” And that comes directly
from the mouth of the CIA director, Bill Casey, in 1981. That CIA policy did
not come from Bill Casey in '81, it started much earlier, right after the
founding of the CIA in 1947.



Lumber Cartel (tinlc) #2063. Spam this account at your own risk.

This sig censored by the Office of Home and Land Insecurity...

Remove XYZ to email me

This comes from Bro. Jon Daily News Digest, today's edition.

DEAD BABIES IN QANA – THE CIA CONNECTION
~~~~~ What the News Media Never Told You and Why ~~~~~


Last Sunday July 30, 2006 , according to news reports, Israeli jets struck
and killed 56 innocent people, mostly children. That's according to
mainstream news media reports in the last four days, so be careful. The
actual facts are far different, and there is something wrong with the news
media reports.

It became apparent by Monday, that the Israeli attack on the Hezbollah
Katyusha rocket launcher truck was about 400 yards away from the collapsed
building where all the bodies were. That's the distance of four football
fields. The Israeli air attack took place about 12:00 midnight. The Israeli
pilot camera videos show the truck was destroyed and that no missiles hit
the 3-story building, supposedly filled with people. Other overhead photos
show the top of the building still intact long after midnight.

But news reports, seemingly directed by Hezbollah, report that at 7:30 am,
an hour after dawn, when it was light outside, the building collapsed
according to numerous news service videos showing the collapsed building.
The collapse of the building, was said by witnesses on the scene and
reported on the news videos as due to missiles from the Israeli jets. But
the Israeli attack was over seven hours before, and no planes were in the
area after that. Is something beginning to look strange here?

Then late Sunday, an observer in Britain, copied the live video of bodies
being carried from the collapsed building and he took still-frame shots out
of the videos. The videos had the live time-stamp showing when the video was
taken. The British observer posted to his website the photos of a young
girl bei ng put into an ambulance at 7:30 am. Two and a half hours later at
10:00am a picture of that same girl is shown being put into another
ambulance. And then 45 minutes later that same girl is shown being carried
out of the rubble by a man with no ambulances around. Is someone trying to
pull a fast one here?

The news reports still continue today that Israeli jets killed 56 in Qana,
but the actual body count by observers on the ground only find 27 bodies,
not 56. Could this difference in numbers be due to the same bodies being
carried out, in front of the video news cameras, two or three times? It's
been done before. Example of something similar; several years ago news
reports showed the results of Israeli bombings in Gaza. The Arab news
services showed in live real time, the funeral crowd carrying a dead body on
a litter. The crowd got rambunctious and the body fell off the litter. So
the “dead body” got up and jumped back on the litter. I saw it with my own
eyes, live. But for the American news media, that part with the “dead body”
getting back on the litter was clipped out. Are the Arabic TV services just
good at propaganda, or are the American and western news services just slow
on the uptake and can't figure out that they have been conned? Let's
continue.

On Tuesday a number of observers around the world watched the taped videos
and noticed something “wrong” with the dead bodies. They were too dead.
Meaning they were stiff as a board. Rigor mortis had set in. Meaning the
bodies had been dead long before the Israeli jet attack at midnight, and
certainly long before the collapse of the building in Qana at 7:30 am. So
those people didn't die from Israeli jets nor from collapsing buildings.
Where did they come from? Some researchers figure they may have come out the
back door of the nearby hospital at Tyre and were then trucked to the
building in Qana. So obviously this was a massive staged media event. But
why?

Remember last week, I reported on the Hezbollah game with the Zelzal
missiles parked in the fenced-in area in Syria, and then the launch trucks
drive through the gate into Lebanon, launch their missiles then drive back
across the fence to Syria. This was supposed to force Israeli pilots to
chase the launch trucks back into Syria and then Syria would be drawn into
the war, because Syrian territory was being attacked by Israeli pilots. This
was the same provocation technique done last week, when Hezbollah soldiers
parked their rocket launch trucks under the UN observer outpost, forcing the
Israeli pilots to attack the outpost, killing four UN observers, but the
blame was placed on Israel not Hezbollah. The news media got it backwards,
and still does. Why?

OK, so if I got the story about the Hezbollah Zelzal game to bring Syria
into the war, then you can assume that Israeli intelligence also had that
same story. Meaning that the Israeli/Lebanese border right next to Syria
was under continuous observation from Israeli pilots, so that the Zelzals
could be destroyed right at launch on the Lebanese side of the border before
they can scoot back to Syria, and then Syria has no excuse for entering the
war.

The only way Hezbollah could play the Zelzal missile trick from Syria is to
halt the Israeli planes from flying overhead. But how to do that? That was
the Sunday media event in Qana. All the front pages around the world and all
TV news outlets carried the horrible visual story of Israel killing 56
innocent children in Qana. As a result, Israel announced a 48 hour bombing
halt, to allow all civilians to escape from the war zone in southern
Lebanon. But if you notice, that Israeli bombing halt only lasted about 48
seconds not hours, especially along the border with Syria. The result was no
Zelzals came through the fence to play the terror game to get Syria into the
war. Instead of missiles, on Monday and Tuesday, Hezbollah launched their
largest Iranian rockets, the FR-5 modified to go about 140 miles. That's not
far enough to make it to Tel Aviv or Jerusalem, but it was farther than
Haifa.

So the event with the “stiff” bodies in Qana, was a staged event, but not
just for propaganda value, but simply a war strategy to get Israel to call a
bombing halt, so Hezbollah could play the Zelzal game. But the strategy
didn't work since Israel did not halt the bombing along the Syrian border,
only in the rest of the war zone. Hezbollah had failed in their military
ploy to play the Zelzal trick, by using the “dead” bodies in Qana.

All of this is a very interesting reporting of events as seen through the
fog of war. What gets first reported in the media is not always what
actually happened. But the much bigger story is why does the American
mainstream news media, almost a week after the event still report that
Israeli jets killed 56 innocent children in Qana? On Tuesday, when
confronted with the facts listed above, some of the American news executives
still insist that it was all Israel's fault. Why? And the executives claim
that researchers on the Internet have no right to question the news
authority of the likes of ABC, AP, New York Times and UPI. OH really?

Maybe your assumption is wrong that the American news media, on your TV or
newspaper, is independent and objective. The BroJon Gazette has been for
years telling you that the news media is carefully and closely controlled by
a single outside source. At the top of this page is the quote which tells
the source. “We'll know our disinformation program is complete when
everything the American public believes is false.” And that comes directly
from the mouth of the CIA director, Bill Casey, in 1981. That CIA policy did
not come from Bill Casey in '81, it started much earlier, right after the
founding of the CIA in 1947.



Lumber Cartel (tinlc) #2063. Spam this account at your own risk.

This sig censored by the Office of Home and Land Insecurity...

Remove XYZ to email me