| Topic: |
Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus |
| User: |
"Mr. Hyde" |
| Date: |
02 Feb 2006 03:47:45 AM |
| Object: |
Something to consider about NASA Shuttle Flights into Outer Space |
There has never been a 'compromised' mission when a Canadian Astronaut has been on board any
of the NASA Space Shuttle launches.
Call them a "good omen", but it definitely must be something that even NASA has given
'serious' thought to.
--
Mr. Hyde(ing) in Plan Site [ :-) ]
.
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to consider about NASA Shuttle Flights into Outer Space |
02 Feb 2006 06:13:29 AM |
|
|
"Mr. Hyde" <mr.hyde@plan-site.com> wrote in message
news:uykEf.8742$Iw6.620810@news20.bellglobal.com...
There has never been a 'compromised' mission when a Canadian Astronaut has
been on board any
of the NASA Space Shuttle launches.
Call them a "good omen", but it definitely must be something that even
NASA has given
'serious' thought to.
I thought you were leaving, Kim! I guess you just decided to change your
name...(again)...
I'm glad you are sticking around; I was going to ask you not to leave, :)!
Jane
--
Mr. Hyde(ing) in Plan Site [ :-) ]
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mr. Hyde" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to consider about NASA Shuttle Flights into Outer Space |
03 Feb 2006 10:43:53 PM |
|
|
Elated that you care.
I have just decided to give up Prophecy Decoding (atleast the current ones) for a while.
"Time to be a plain ole 'antagonists' like some of the other people here." ;-)
[not to be taken personally; I'm talking about some of the other morons here.]
--
Mr. Hyde(ing) in Plan Site [ :-) ]
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:GHmEf.7142$Sk1.250518@news20.bellglobal.com...
"Mr. Hyde" <mr.hyde@plan-site.com> wrote in message
news:uykEf.8742$Iw6.620810@news20.bellglobal.com...
There has never been a 'compromised' mission when a Canadian Astronaut has
been on board any
of the NASA Space Shuttle launches.
Call them a "good omen", but it definitely must be something that even
NASA has given
'serious' thought to.
I thought you were leaving, Kim! I guess you just decided to change your
name...(again)...
I'm glad you are sticking around; I was going to ask you not to leave, :)!
Jane
--
Mr. Hyde(ing) in Plan Site [ :-) ]
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Wally Anglesea™" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to consider about NASA Shuttle Flights into Outer Space |
02 Feb 2006 11:54:41 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 04:47:45 -0500, "Mr. Hyde" <mr.hyde@plan-site.com>
wrote:
There has never been a 'compromised' mission when a Canadian Astronaut has been on board any
of the NASA Space Shuttle launches.
Call them a "good omen", but it definitely must be something that even NASA has given
'serious' thought to.
The Shuttle doesn't fly to "Outer Space"
--
Read all about Australia's biggest doomsday cult:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm
"You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mr. Hyde" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to consider about NASA Shuttle Flights into Outer Space |
03 Feb 2006 10:38:04 PM |
|
|
Aahh, but it does !!!
It leaves the Inner Space region of our atmosphere (even if it doesn't leave the magnetic pull
of the planet).
IE: Outer Space.
Mr. Hyde(ing) in Plan Site [ :-) ]
"Wally AngleseaT" <wanglese@spammersareverminbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:7tr5u1ln04o4ku53oingdoo7rvmom7tvb0@4ax.com...
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 04:47:45 -0500, "Mr. Hyde" <mr.hyde@plan-site.com>
wrote:
There has never been a 'compromised' mission when a Canadian Astronaut has been on board
any
of the NASA Space Shuttle launches.
Call them a "good omen", but it definitely must be something that even NASA has given
'serious' thought to.
The Shuttle doesn't fly to "Outer Space"
--
Read all about Australia's biggest doomsday cult:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm
"You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to consider about NASA Shuttle Flights into Outer Space |
04 Feb 2006 04:28:15 AM |
|
|
"Aahh, but it does !!!"
Ooops. I have to agree with Wally, Kim.
The term, 'Outer Space' is properly used when refering to a distance
from the Earth where the gravitational effect of the planet is no
longer noticeable. Some say 50,000 miles is enough to describe the area
as 'Outer Space. Others say 100,000 miles.
In any event, the shuttle is just an orbiter, tied to the Earth's
gravitational attraction.
Ricky
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mr. Hyde" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to consider about NASA Shuttle Flights into Outer Space |
04 Feb 2006 05:49:55 AM |
|
|
You say Tomatos, I say Tomatoes !!!
Good Point though 'Wolfy' - where does the Cosmos actually begin for this planet Earth.
(otherwise know as outer space versus inner space). Is it the end of the Atmosphere of the
planet (as some would believe) or the outer regions of the Gravitational Pull of the Planet
(as others would believe) ???
If you believe the latter, then you must believe that man must exceed twice the distance
beyond the distance from the Earth to the Moon before one moves beyond the planetary pull of
the Earth's gravity, and finally reaches 'Outer Space'.
I prefer to think that this is much closer (ie: moving beyond the 'current' Earth's
Atmosphere) is scientific enough for me.
--
Mr. Hyde(ing) in Plan Site [ :-) ]
"Werewolfy" <thegrimreaper10@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1139048895.941921.243920@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
"Aahh, but it does !!!"
Ooops. I have to agree with Wally, Kim.
The term, 'Outer Space' is properly used when refering to a distance
from the Earth where the gravitational effect of the planet is no
longer noticeable. Some say 50,000 miles is enough to describe the area
as 'Outer Space. Others say 100,000 miles.
In any event, the shuttle is just an orbiter, tied to the Earth's
gravitational attraction.
Ricky
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to consider about NASA Shuttle Flights into Outer Space |
04 Feb 2006 08:19:24 AM |
|
|
"where does the Cosmos actually begin for this planet Earth. (otherwise
know as outer space versus inner space)."
I'm pre-occupied with space right now. In a few hours I have a very
long drive from here (near the Spanish border) up to Le Havre and a
cross channel ferry to England. The point is, to leave as much
essential bric-a-brac in England, preparatory to my move there. I also
have a couple of houses in Shepton Mallet, Somerset, to look at.
Judith is packing the car. The sills are now a lot closer to the ground
that seems wise. Perhaps the ferry ramp will cause a problem! How she
has placed so much in there I will never know. It weighs far more than
is good for the vehicle. Still...It's a start in this damned moving
process ;) I should be back on Wednesday night/Thursday morning.
Ah yes, 'Space'...Outer and Inner.
These are rather dated terms Kim, dated in a scientific way that is.
They really belong to the Science Fiction era of the 1950's, where the
expression was first coined,and a difference of 'space' loosely
suggested.
Today some like to call interstellar distances 'Deep Space', another
writers term.
Space is what is is. Nothingness. Having said that, we know now that
between radiation, solar winds and debris..nothingness is hard to find.
Some would only ascribe 'Outer Space' to be valid when discussing
interplanetary travel. A 'short' trip to the moon merely exchanges the
gravitational attraction of the Earth, to that of the moon at a
specified point. Many would not use the term, 'Outer Space' for this
reason.
It's an out-dated term Kim. It's also a term that can belittle the
vastness of the Universe. On a cosmic scale, our solar system is not
worth even mentioning.
No, best I think to put aside the 'Inner' and 'Outer' phaseology of the
50's and describe things as belonging to a body...or describe the empty
regions between stars...and between Galaxies.
The (seemingly) empty regions of unimaginable distances. That's
'Space'. At least it seems to be to be a better way of describing it.
'Inner' space isn't 'space' at all. It's just the upper reaches of the
Earth's atmosphere and an area extending contemperaneously to it's
gravitational attraction.
Ah well. Perhaps there is enough 'space' in the car for me to get in
and drive the 2000 mile round trip? ;)
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Johnny Borborigmi" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to consider about NASA Shuttle Flights into Outer Space |
04 Feb 2006 07:10:48 AM |
|
|
On 2006-02-03 00:54:41 -0500, Wally Anglesea™
<wanglese@spammersareverminbigpond.net.au> said:
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 04:47:45 -0500, "Mr. Hyde" <mr.hyde@plan-site.com>
wrote:
There has never been a 'compromised' mission when a Canadian Astronaut
has been on board any
of the NASA Space Shuttle launches.
Call them a "good omen", but it definitely must be something that even
NASA has given
'serious' thought to.
The Shuttle doesn't fly to "Outer Space"
That is correct. It is not designed to fly in outer space.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
