| Topic: |
Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus |
| User: |
"psychogaray" |
| Date: |
28 Jan 2008 10:17:49 AM |
| Object: |
Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex !! |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAe4km0xiy0&feature=related
.
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex!! |
05 Feb 2008 01:16:41 PM |
|
|
On 5 Feb, 17:23, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 14:23:58 -0800 (PST), Werewolfy
<Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 2 Feb, 14:48, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
So, when you made that post, you were referring to *only* times when
the man didn't know the girl's real age?
Leave it Dani. I won't ask you again.
Oh gee, and I wonder just why you want me to leave it. =EF=BF=BDYou were
pretending to agree with Woods and you told her that what she was
saying is the exact point you have been trying to get across all
along. But she's under the impression that you're referring to the
times when the kid lies and gives a false age (18 years) .. and THAT
is why she agreed with you.
But that isn't what you're saying, is it, Ricky? =EF=BF=BDYou won't answer=
my
question because you're saying it's still okay if the adult knows the
real age of the kid.
Oh, and as far as your statement: "Nature is more powerful than any
law" .. We also have the fight/flight instinct. =EF=BF=BDImagine if when y=
ou
were working as a cop, a man assaulted someone and when you went to
aresst him, he looked at you and said: "My fight or flight instinct
kicked in but the fight instinct won so I beat him!!" =EF=BF=BDWould your
theory matter in that case? =EF=BF=BDOr would you still aresst him?
Dani
I said 'Leave it'.
You won't. Future posts that are derogatory against you will be
justified.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex !! |
05 Feb 2008 02:35:19 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:16:41 -0800 (PST), Werewolfy
<Werewolfy1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 5 Feb, 17:23, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 14:23:58 -0800 (PST), Werewolfy
<Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 2 Feb, 14:48, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
So, when you made that post, you were referring to *only* times when
the man didn't know the girl's real age?
Leave it Dani. I won't ask you again.
Oh gee, and I wonder just why you want me to leave it. ?You were
pretending to agree with Woods and you told her that what she was
saying is the exact point you have been trying to get across all
along. But she's under the impression that you're referring to the
times when the kid lies and gives a false age (18 years) .. and THAT
is why she agreed with you.
But that isn't what you're saying, is it, Ricky? ?You won't answer my
question because you're saying it's still okay if the adult knows the
real age of the kid.
Oh, and as far as your statement: "Nature is more powerful than any
law" .. We also have the fight/flight instinct. ?Imagine if when you
were working as a cop, a man assaulted someone and when you went to
aresst him, he looked at you and said: "My fight or flight instinct
kicked in but the fight instinct won so I beat him!!" ?Would your
theory matter in that case? ?Or would you still aresst him?
Dani
I said 'Leave it'.
I don't take orders from you. Oh, and this is a discussion group. Key
word being *discussion*
You won't. Future posts that are derogatory against you will be
justified.
Even if I'm *right* in my future posts? Just a little biased, are
you?
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex!! |
05 Feb 2008 03:15:42 PM |
|
|
On 5 Feb, 20:35, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
if I'm *right* in my future posts? =EF=BF=BDJust a little biased, areyou?
Right? Dani Bell right?
No, that's not happened yet. Perhaps when you grow up you might come
to terms with the distinction between right and wrong.
At the moment, you re still that foul mouthed pseudo poster who says
she is a girl with a friend called Amy, who says she has been to the
UK and who says her brother died in Iraq.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex !! |
05 Feb 2008 03:35:48 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 13:15:42 -0800 (PST), Werewolfy
<Werewolfy1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 5 Feb, 20:35, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
if I'm *right* in my future posts? ?Just a little biased, areyou?
Right? Dani Bell right?
No, that's not happened yet. Perhaps when you grow up you might come
to terms with the distinction between right and wrong.
At the moment, you re still that foul mouthed pseudo poster who says
she is a girl with a friend called Amy, who says she has been to the
UK and who says her brother died in Iraq.
I posted from the UK so none of you would doubt that I was in fact
there. I made a post that can be traced back to the UK.
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex!! |
05 Feb 2008 07:10:44 PM |
|
|
On 5 Feb, 21:35, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
I posted from the UK so none of you would doubt that I was in fact
there. =EF=BF=BDI made a post that can be traced back to the UK.
I would love to know all about your flight. You....like...flying? Yes,
that's an intriguing matter.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex !! |
05 Feb 2008 08:18:13 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 17:10:44 -0800 (PST), Werewolfy
<Werewolfy1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 5 Feb, 21:35, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
I posted from the UK so none of you would doubt that I was in fact
there. ?I made a post that can be traced back to the UK.
I would love to know all about your flight. You....like...flying? Yes,
that's an intriguing matter.
What are you talking about?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex!! |
05 Feb 2008 09:07:16 PM |
|
|
On 6 Feb, 02:18, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
"What are you talking about? "
You are doing it again. It's true then...you have a problem with
reading?
Werewolfy=EF=BF=BD
.
|
|
|
| User: "JTEM" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex!! |
05 Feb 2008 09:12:43 PM |
|
|
Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
You are doing it again. It's true then...you have a problem
with reading?
The irony just reached critical mass....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex!! |
05 Feb 2008 10:00:35 PM |
|
|
On 6 Feb, 03:12, JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
"The irony just reached critical mass...."
Oh Little Johnny...I shouldn't be talking to you really. Just having a
touch of difficulty with a female. Don't suppose you know much about
that though, all things considered.
This is the stuff you like...isn't it? Thrive on it...it's your life-
blood. Gorge yourself, feed and feast.
Who cares...not me. Long ago I dismissed you.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex!! |
05 Feb 2008 01:26:14 PM |
|
|
On 5 Feb, 17:23, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
We also have the fight/flight instinct. =EF=BF=BDImagine if when you
were working as a cop, a man assaulted someone and when you went to
aresst him, he looked at you and said: "My fight or flight instinct
kicked in but the fight instinct won so I beat him!!" =EF=BF=BDWould your
theory matter in that case? =EF=BF=BDOr would you still aresst him?
I won't answer this rather odd example masquerading as a question.
Sort of rubbish one hears from drunks in a pub.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex !! |
05 Feb 2008 02:32:26 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:26:14 -0800 (PST), Werewolfy
<Werewolfy1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 5 Feb, 17:23, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
We also have the fight/flight instinct. ?Imagine if when you
were working as a cop, a man assaulted someone and when you went to
aresst him, he looked at you and said: "My fight or flight instinct
kicked in but the fight instinct won so I beat him!!" ?Would your
theory matter in that case? ?Or would you still aresst him?
I won't answer this rather odd example masquerading as a question.
Sort of rubbish one hears from drunks in a pub.
Really? What happened to your statement: "Nature is more powerful
than any law." We do have a fight or flight instinct. So according to
you, if someone is having a verbal argument and it escalates into him
feeling violent, he either walks away or he throws a punch and
assaults the guy he's having the fight with.
If he assaults the guy, why should he be punished when nature is more
powerful than any law?
I already told you that you can't make such a statement and then
decide which of our natural instincts should be acceptable in society
and which ones shouldn't.
Dani
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "WH" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex!! |
01 Feb 2008 01:24:43 PM |
|
|
On Feb 1, 8:05=A0pm, Woodswun <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 04:19:18 +0000, Dani wrote:
On 31 Jan 2008 01:59:28 GMT, Woodswun <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:50:06 -0800, danisnewlover wrote:
On Jan 28, 11:17 am, "psychogaray" <psychovi...@comcast.net> wrote:
You are the sick mind Doc!!!
The more this group know, the more it is expose
all the child sexers here, you, the Wolf, the WH,
the Lemke, the Per3id in fact it seem that most
of the male here are child sexers!!!
Maybe 3 or 4 of the male here seem like the normal,
the other all seek the little girl!!!
I like to see how the female in this group to feel
about this???
Of course it's revolting. =A0But then again, Playboy centerfolds are usu=
ally
only 18 or so, which also seems gross to me. =A0 (Not as sick, but there=
's a
definite "ewww" factor in there), but that's perfectly legal and sociall=
y
acceptable, so what do I know? =A0(And since I brought up Playboy - real=
ly,
what 18 year old needs airbrushing?!?)
We're not talking about 18 year olds that pose for Playboy, Woods.
We're talking about grown adults that have sex with 14 year old kids.
And then to add massive insult to injury, Ricky believes that it's the
*kid's* fault more-so than the adult's fault because it's simply
"nature" - the adult is being manipulated and seduced by the kid and
can't say no to her/his advances.
Well, in some states it's legal for a 14 year old to marry, so even though=
we find it repulsive, it's apparently not quite so clearcut as to whether
it's "wrong" or not. =A0My personal opinion is that any parent that consen=
ts
to their kid getting married is an unfit parent, regardless of how old
that kid is. =A0
Ricky's comments are not entirely without merit, IMHO. =A0There are some
cases where very young girls deliberately set out to go after men, and
they don't look nearly as young as they are. =A0Of course, once the man
finds out how young she is, he's responsible for hightailing it out of
there, but yeah, there are girls like that.
My opinion is the same Woodsy. And what Ricky wrote is just an
explanation as to how the situation could be...not an endorsement of
it!
Problem is the douglas who has twisted it around to suit his own
pathetic bollocks!
WH
.
|
|
|
| User: "psychogaray" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex !! |
01 Feb 2008 03:26:26 PM |
|
|
"WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:10afde49-a66b-4e6e-acfb-500aa2bd60f5@i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 1, 8:05 pm, Woodswun <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 04:19:18 +0000, Dani wrote:
On 31 Jan 2008 01:59:28 GMT, Woodswun <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:50:06 -0800, danisnewlover wrote:
On Jan 28, 11:17 am, "psychogaray" <psychovi...@comcast.net> wrote:
You are the sick mind Doc!!!
The more this group know, the more it is expose
all the child sexers here, you, the Wolf, the WH,
the Lemke, the Per3id in fact it seem that most
of the male here are child sexers!!!
Maybe 3 or 4 of the male here seem like the normal,
the other all seek the little girl!!!
I like to see how the female in this group to feel
about this???
Of course it's revolting. But then again, Playboy centerfolds are
usually
only 18 or so, which also seems gross to me. (Not as sick, but there's a
definite "ewww" factor in there), but that's perfectly legal and
socially
acceptable, so what do I know? (And since I brought up Playboy - really,
what 18 year old needs airbrushing?!?)
We're not talking about 18 year olds that pose for Playboy, Woods.
We're talking about grown adults that have sex with 14 year old kids.
And then to add massive insult to injury, Ricky believes that it's the
*kid's* fault more-so than the adult's fault because it's simply
"nature" - the adult is being manipulated and seduced by the kid and
can't say no to her/his advances.
Well, in some states it's legal for a 14 year old to marry, so even though
we find it repulsive, it's apparently not quite so clearcut as to whether
it's "wrong" or not. My personal opinion is that any parent that consents
to their kid getting married is an unfit parent, regardless of how old
that kid is.
Ricky's comments are not entirely without merit, IMHO. There are some
cases where very young girls deliberately set out to go after men, and
they don't look nearly as young as they are. Of course, once the man
finds out how young she is, he's responsible for hightailing it out of
there, but yeah, there are girls like that.
My opinion is the same Woodsy. And what Ricky wrote is just an
explanation as to how the situation could be...not an endorsement of
it!
Problem is the douglas who has twisted it around to suit his own
pathetic bollocks!
WH
He creeps through the chicken farms late at night, looking for hot plump
hens to ravish.
garay ;))~
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex!! |
31 Jan 2008 08:57:10 AM |
|
|
On Jan 30, 8:59 pm, Woodswun <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:50:06 -0800, danisnewlover wrote:
On Jan 28, 11:17 am, "psychogaray" <psychovi...@comcast.net> wrote:
You are the sick mind Doc!!!
The more this group know, the more it is expose
all the child sexers here, you, the Wolf, the WH,
the Lemke, the Per3id in fact it seem that most
of the male here are child sexers!!!
Maybe 3 or 4 of the male here seem like the normal,
the other all seek the little girl!!!
I like to see how the female in this group to feel
about this???
Of course it's revolting. But then again, Playboy centerfolds are usually
only 18 or so, which also seems gross to me. (Not as sick, but there's a
definite "ewww" factor in there), but that's perfectly legal and socially
acceptable, so what do I know? (And since I brought up Playboy - really,
what 18 year old needs airbrushing?!?)
Same goes for older women who go after boys of the same age group. Just -
eww.
I think that Ricky and Gary are pulling your leg, though. I don't know
about Gary's status, but Ricky seems to be happily married to a woman in
his own age bracket.
Woods
No, you go the falls way, the Doc and the Wolf want it to be ok
to have the sex with the 14 or even 13, maybe 12 yr old girl!!!
Nothing to do with 18 and take the pictures!!!
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
