| Topic: |
Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus |
| User: |
"psychogaray" |
| Date: |
28 Jan 2008 10:17:49 AM |
| Object: |
Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex !! |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAe4km0xiy0&feature=related
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex!! |
28 Jan 2008 06:50:06 PM |
|
|
On Jan 28, 11:17 am, "psychogaray" <psychovi...@comcast.net> wrote:
You are the sick mind Doc!!!
The more this group know, the more it is expose
all the child sexers here, you, the Wolf, the WH,
the Lemke, the Per3id in fact it seem that most
of the male here are child sexers!!!
Maybe 3 or 4 of the male here seem like the normal,
the other all seek the little girl!!!
I like to see how the female in this group to feel
about this???
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex!! |
28 Jan 2008 09:43:03 PM |
|
|
On Jan 28, 4:50 pm, wrote:
On Jan 28, 11:17 am, "psychogaray" <psychovi...@comcast.net> wrote:
You are the sick mind Doc!!!
The more this group know, the more it is expose
all the child sexers here, you, the Wolf, the WH,
the Lemke, the Per3id in fact it seem that most
of the male here are child sexers!!!
Maybe 3 or 4 of the male here seem like the normal,
the other all seek the little girl!!!
I like to see how the female in this group to feel
about this???
We already know how Dani feels about it. It's difficult to believe she
hasn't received more support as she expresses her objection to the
idea of an adult having sex with a 14-year-old child. I'm just about
as disappointed as I can be with the silence of some of the regulars
who post here. Amazing.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex!! |
30 Jan 2008 01:53:47 PM |
|
|
On Jan 28, 10:43=A0pm, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
We already know how Dani feels about it. It's difficult to believe she
hasn't received more support as she expresses her objection to the
idea of an adult having sex with a 14-year-old child. I'm just about
as disappointed as I can be with the silence of some of the regulars
who post here. Amazing.
I doubt that we'd take your moralizing any more seriously even if you
could manage to scrub the blood of so many dead muslims from your
black, nasty soul.
http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSL3048857920080130?feedType=3DRS=
S&feedName=3DworldNews&rpc=3D22&sp=3Dtrue
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex!! |
30 Jan 2008 07:16:35 PM |
|
|
On Jan 30, 11:53 am, John Lemke <jfle...@locallink.net> wrote:
On Jan 28, 10:43 pm, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
We already know how Dani feels about it. It's difficult to believe she
hasn't received more support as she expresses her objection to the
idea of an adult having sex with a 14-year-old child. I'm just about
as disappointed as I can be with the silence of some of the regulars
who post here. Amazing.
I doubt that we'd take your moralizing any more seriously
Hmm, that makes it sound like you disagree with me on that particular
topic. How interesting.
even if you could manage to scrub the blood of so many dead
muslims from your black, nasty soul.
http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSL3048857920080130?feedTy...
Are you hoping it's 1,000,000 or more? Why else would you post this
number, when there's another study with a far larger base of people
who were interviewed.
Thursday, 10 January 2008, 01:01 GMT
New study says 151,000 Iraqi dead
[excerpt] One of the biggest surveys so far of Iraqis who have died
violently since the US-led invasion of 2003 has put the figure at
about 151,000.
This is about a quarter of the figure given in a disputed Lancet
article, but nearly three times higher than that of the Iraq Body
Count campaigning group.
The result is based on interviews with over 9,000 families across Iraq
carried out by the health ministry for the WHO.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7180055.stm
Any number is too many. But why hope it's the largest number you can
find? Do you realize that it would have taken approximately 567 deaths
per day, every day, since the invasion began to have reached 1,000,000
at this point? In July 2006, it was reported by the Iraqi government
that a daily average of 110 Iraqis were killed that month. That was a
particularly bad month. So how do you think it's possible that an
average of 567 were killed every day, every month, every year?
And I wonder, did you ever express your concern for the thousands of
Iraqis who were dying every month under Saddam's horrific leadership?
Did you ever express your concern for the hundreds of thousands of
Iraqis Saddam put into mass graves? Did you ever express your concern
for the children who were tortured in front of their parents by
Saddam's henchmen? Did you ever express your concern for the wives who
were gang raped in front of their husbands by Saddam's henchmen? Did
you ever express your concern for the Iraqi Olympic who were tortured
by Saddam's sadistic sons? Did you care about any of that?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex !! |
29 Jan 2008 09:56:56 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:43:03 -0800 (PST), Steven Douglas
<dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 28, 4:50 pm, wrote:
On Jan 28, 11:17 am, "psychogaray" <psychovi...@comcast.net> wrote:
You are the sick mind Doc!!!
The more this group know, the more it is expose
all the child sexers here, you, the Wolf, the WH,
the Lemke, the Per3id in fact it seem that most
of the male here are child sexers!!!
Maybe 3 or 4 of the male here seem like the normal,
the other all seek the little girl!!!
I like to see how the female in this group to feel
about this???
We already know how Dani feels about it. It's difficult to believe she
hasn't received more support as she expresses her objection to the
idea of an adult having sex with a 14-year-old child. I'm just about
as disappointed as I can be with the silence of some of the regulars
who post here. Amazing.
I don't think anyone wants to get involved, Steven. This group is
more politically driven than anything else I'm thinking. Meaning we
have our "sides" that we're on and the people we get along with and
the people we don't get along with. See, I've pretty much always
gotten along with Ricky in here, and Doc and I are hot and cold.
People don't like to step outta those comfort zones. I did and look
what's happening to me. Some people have just stopped posting all
together.
Anyway, I've also wondered if you're not getting a little something
from this because you don't get along with Doc and Ricky? I really
hope that isn't the reason, Steven. Forgive me if I'm wrong and thank
you.
Cheers,
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex!! |
30 Jan 2008 06:05:24 AM |
|
|
On Jan 29, 10:56 pm, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:43:03 -0800 (PST), Steven Douglas
<dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 28, 4:50 pm, wrote:
On Jan 28, 11:17 am, "psychogaray" <psychovi...@comcast.net> wrote:
You are the sick mind Doc!!!
The more this group know, the more it is expose
all the child sexers here, you, the Wolf, the WH,
the Lemke, the Per3id in fact it seem that most
of the male here are child sexers!!!
Maybe 3 or 4 of the male here seem like the normal,
the other all seek the little girl!!!
I like to see how the female in this group to feel
about this???
We already know how Dani feels about it. It's difficult to believe she
hasn't received more support as she expresses her objection to the
idea of an adult having sex with a 14-year-old child. I'm just about
as disappointed as I can be with the silence of some of the regulars
who post here. Amazing.
I don't think anyone wants to get involved, Steven.
And this tell you what??? That they are Loser!!!
This group is
more politically driven than anything else I'm thinking. Meaning we
have our "sides" that we're on and the people we get along with and
the people we don't get along with.
So if you get along with child sexer then you to ignore
his crime???
Don't go the falls way of the Doc (sick mind) and the Wolf (Douche
Bag)!!!
See, I've pretty much always
gotten along with Ricky in here, and Doc and I are hot and cold.
People don't like to step outta those comfort zones. I did and look
what's happening to me. Some people have just stopped posting all
together.
That is because you did not go the falls way!!!
Be the strong and go your own way, not the way of the sick mind!!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex !! |
30 Jan 2008 10:19:53 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 04:05:24 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 29, 10:56 pm, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:43:03 -0800 (PST), Steven Douglas
<dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 28, 4:50 pm, wrote:
On Jan 28, 11:17 am, "psychogaray" <psychovi...@comcast.net> wrote:
You are the sick mind Doc!!!
The more this group know, the more it is expose
all the child sexers here, you, the Wolf, the WH,
the Lemke, the Per3id in fact it seem that most
of the male here are child sexers!!!
Maybe 3 or 4 of the male here seem like the normal,
the other all seek the little girl!!!
I like to see how the female in this group to feel
about this???
We already know how Dani feels about it. It's difficult to believe she
hasn't received more support as she expresses her objection to the
idea of an adult having sex with a 14-year-old child. I'm just about
as disappointed as I can be with the silence of some of the regulars
who post here. Amazing.
I don't think anyone wants to get involved, Steven.
And this tell you what??? That they are Loser!!!
There seems to be an over-powering Political drive going on here
that's making everyone lose their senses. I'm not driven by Politics
like they are...and it's no fun having to now fight with people that
I've gotten along with for the past almost 7 years.
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex!! |
31 Jan 2008 08:59:14 AM |
|
|
On Jan 30, 11:19 pm, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 04:05:24 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
On Jan 29, 10:56 pm, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:43:03 -0800 (PST), Steven Douglas
<dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 28, 4:50 pm, wrote:
On Jan 28, 11:17 am, "psychogaray" <psychovi...@comcast.net> wrote:
You are the sick mind Doc!!!
The more this group know, the more it is expose
all the child sexers here, you, the Wolf, the WH,
the Lemke, the Per3id in fact it seem that most
of the male here are child sexers!!!
Maybe 3 or 4 of the male here seem like the normal,
the other all seek the little girl!!!
I like to see how the female in this group to feel
about this???
We already know how Dani feels about it. It's difficult to believe she
hasn't received more support as she expresses her objection to the
idea of an adult having sex with a 14-year-old child. I'm just about
as disappointed as I can be with the silence of some of the regulars
who post here. Amazing.
I don't think anyone wants to get involved, Steven.
And this tell you what??? That they are Loser!!!
There seems to be an over-powering Political drive going on here
that's making everyone lose their senses. I'm not driven by Politics
like they are...and it's no fun having to now fight with people that
I've gotten along with for the past almost 7 years.
Dani
The Doc lose the sense a long time ago!!!
The Wolf, he is false police who like the little girls!!!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex!! |
30 Jan 2008 01:11:39 AM |
|
|
On Jan 29, 7:56 pm, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:43:03 -0800 (PST), Steven Douglas
<dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 28, 4:50 pm, wrote:
On Jan 28, 11:17 am, "psychogaray" <psychovi...@comcast.net> wrote:
You are the sick mind Doc!!!
The more this group know, the more it is expose
all the child sexers here, you, the Wolf, the WH,
the Lemke, the Per3id in fact it seem that most
of the male here are child sexers!!!
Maybe 3 or 4 of the male here seem like the normal,
the other all seek the little girl!!!
I like to see how the female in this group to feel
about this???
We already know how Dani feels about it. It's difficult to believe she
hasn't received more support as she expresses her objection to the
idea of an adult having sex with a 14-year-old child. I'm just about
as disappointed as I can be with the silence of some of the regulars
who post here. Amazing.
I don't think anyone wants to get involved, Steven. This group is
more politically driven than anything else I'm thinking. Meaning we
have our "sides" that we're on and the people we get along with and
the people we don't get along with. See, I've pretty much always
gotten along with Ricky in here, and Doc and I are hot and cold.
People don't like to step outta those comfort zones. I did and look
what's happening to me. Some people have just stopped posting all
together.
Anyway, I've also wondered if you're not getting a little something
from this because you don't get along with Doc and Ricky? I really
hope that isn't the reason, Steven. Forgive me if I'm wrong and thank
you.
You're wondering whether a man actually feels as strongly about this
topic as you do? I can understand why you might question it since none
of the other so-called men who post here have stood up to agree with
you. But rest assured, most men in our society agree with us. Normal
men have an instinctively protective nature when it comes to children.
There are exceptions, of course, and normal men know that and want to
protect children from those exceptions. That's why we have the laws we
have.
I had this debate with Doc and Ricky about a year ago. As I did then,
I'd be saying the things I've been saying whether you were here
posting or not. But I'm glad you're here to express your opinion. And
it's really interesting that they felt the need to question your
motivation. If they believe a woman would *only* tell them they're
wrong because she had personally been taken advantage of, as a child,
by an older man -- doesn't that demonstrate that they *know* the
behavior they support is wrong?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex!! |
30 Jan 2008 12:00:04 PM |
|
|
On 30 Jan, 07:11, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
" If they believe a woman would *only* tell them they're wrong because
she had personally been taken advantage of, as a child, by an older
man -- doesn't that demonstrate that they *know* the
behavior they support is wrong"
Now I know you are doing this on purpose, and with spite.
This is not what I, nor Doc said at all. When I suggested that
'perhaps Dani has her own demons...etc" I intended that as a kindly
way of mentioning the possibility that she has some good reason to
feel so impassioned. You have completely altered the sentence by your
supposition disguised as a quote. It is YOUR supposition..NOT mine.
You venomous, spiteful hate-filled lying *****. You ARE doing this
because you can't bear either myself or Doc. Just not big enough to
admit to that.
I persist in part, because I bloody hate you and all you stand for.
WH has it right.
***** Douglas
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex!! |
30 Jan 2008 07:03:07 PM |
|
|
On Jan 30, 10:00 am, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 30 Jan, 07:11, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
" If they believe a woman would *only* tell them they're wrong because
she had personally been taken advantage of, as a child, by an older
man -- doesn't that demonstrate that they *know* the
behavior they support is wrong"
Now I know you are doing this on purpose, and with spite.
I am doing it *with* purpose, but not spite. I'm doing it because I
believe very strongly that I'm right on this topic.
This is not what I, nor Doc said at all. When I suggested that
'perhaps Dani has her own demons...etc" I intended that as a kindly
way of mentioning the possibility that she has some good reason to
feel so impassioned.
What is there about an adult/child sexual relationship that would
cause the "demons" you mentioned? And why do you believe that is the
only reason a woman would feel so impassioned about this topic?
You have completely altered the sentence by your
supposition disguised as a quote. It is YOUR supposition..NOT mine.
You and Doc both questioned Dani's reason for feeling so impassioned,
as if it's only possible for someone to feel impassioned about this if
he or she has some personal experience as an underlying reason. Well,
I have no "demons" causing my belief. I'm just disgusted by adults who
think it's justifiable to have sex with a child under any
circumstances.
You venomous, spiteful hate-filled lying *****. You ARE doing this
because you can't bear either myself or Doc. Just not big enough to
admit to that.
I persist in part, because I bloody hate you and all you stand for.
But you're not a venomous, spiteful hate-filled lying *****, are
you? I'm not even as bad as you are, yet you expect me to hold myself
to a much higher standard than you would ever consider for yourself.
Why?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex!! |
30 Jan 2008 07:30:25 PM |
|
|
On 31 Jan, 01:03, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
Snip
The discussion is closed.
All discussion with you is closed.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex!! |
31 Jan 2008 08:55:37 AM |
|
|
On Jan 30, 8:30 pm, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 31 Jan, 01:03, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
Snip
The discussion is closed.
All discussion with you is closed.
Werewolfy
What is need is for you big mouth to close!!!
Had you chemical today have you?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex!! |
30 Jan 2008 06:06:39 AM |
|
|
On Jan 30, 2:11 am, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 29, 7:56 pm, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:43:03 -0800 (PST), Steven Douglas
<dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 28, 4:50 pm, wrote:
On Jan 28, 11:17 am, "psychogaray" <psychovi...@comcast.net> wrote:
You are the sick mind Doc!!!
The more this group know, the more it is expose
all the child sexers here, you, the Wolf, the WH,
the Lemke, the Per3id in fact it seem that most
of the male here are child sexers!!!
Maybe 3 or 4 of the male here seem like the normal,
the other all seek the little girl!!!
I like to see how the female in this group to feel
about this???
We already know how Dani feels about it. It's difficult to believe she
hasn't received more support as she expresses her objection to the
idea of an adult having sex with a 14-year-old child. I'm just about
as disappointed as I can be with the silence of some of the regulars
who post here. Amazing.
I don't think anyone wants to get involved, Steven. This group is
more politically driven than anything else I'm thinking. Meaning we
have our "sides" that we're on and the people we get along with and
the people we don't get along with. See, I've pretty much always
gotten along with Ricky in here, and Doc and I are hot and cold.
People don't like to step outta those comfort zones. I did and look
what's happening to me. Some people have just stopped posting all
together.
Anyway, I've also wondered if you're not getting a little something
from this because you don't get along with Doc and Ricky? I really
hope that isn't the reason, Steven. Forgive me if I'm wrong and thank
you.
You're wondering whether a man actually feels as strongly about this
topic as you do? I can understand why you might question it since none
of the other so-called men who post here have stood up to agree with
you. But rest assured, most men in our society agree with us. Normal
men have an instinctively protective nature when it comes to children.
There are exceptions, of course, and normal men know that and want to
protect children from those exceptions. That's why we have the laws we
have.
I had this debate with Doc and Ricky about a year ago. As I did then,
I'd be saying the things I've been saying whether you were here
posting or not. But I'm glad you're here to express your opinion. And
it's really interesting that they felt the need to question your
motivation. If they believe a woman would *only* tell them they're
wrong because she had personally been taken advantage of, as a child,
by an older man -- doesn't that demonstrate that they *know* the
behavior they support is wrong?
They are of the sick mind!!!
The Doc, the Wolf, the Per3id, the WH and all who are
the silent and protect these Douche Bags!!!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex !! |
30 Jan 2008 10:18:39 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 23:11:39 -0800 (PST), Steven Douglas
<dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 29, 7:56 pm, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:43:03 -0800 (PST), Steven Douglas
<dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 28, 4:50 pm, wrote:
On Jan 28, 11:17 am, "psychogaray" <psychovi...@comcast.net> wrote:
You are the sick mind Doc!!!
The more this group know, the more it is expose
all the child sexers here, you, the Wolf, the WH,
the Lemke, the Per3id in fact it seem that most
of the male here are child sexers!!!
Maybe 3 or 4 of the male here seem like the normal,
the other all seek the little girl!!!
I like to see how the female in this group to feel
about this???
We already know how Dani feels about it. It's difficult to believe she
hasn't received more support as she expresses her objection to the
idea of an adult having sex with a 14-year-old child. I'm just about
as disappointed as I can be with the silence of some of the regulars
who post here. Amazing.
I don't think anyone wants to get involved, Steven. This group is
more politically driven than anything else I'm thinking. Meaning we
have our "sides" that we're on and the people we get along with and
the people we don't get along with. See, I've pretty much always
gotten along with Ricky in here, and Doc and I are hot and cold.
People don't like to step outta those comfort zones. I did and look
what's happening to me. Some people have just stopped posting all
together.
Anyway, I've also wondered if you're not getting a little something
from this because you don't get along with Doc and Ricky? I really
hope that isn't the reason, Steven. Forgive me if I'm wrong and thank
you.
You're wondering whether a man actually feels as strongly about this
topic as you do?
No, not because you're a man - because of the Political divide that
seems to drive this group (at nearly any cost it seems), and because
you don't like Doc and Ricky.
I can understand why you might question it since none
of the other so-called men who post here have stood up to agree with
you.
I just wanted to make sure you're agreeing with me for the right
reasons.
But rest assured, most men in our society agree with us.
The men here do agree with us, I'm sure...they just don't want to step
outside of their comfort zones. And trust me, I don't enjoy this one
bit...this is very hard for me to now have to stand against people
I've gotten along with and have considered friends for years. But
what am I supposed to do? Sit back and shut up because it would be
more "comfortable" than what I'm doing now? Nah, I'm sick of shutting
up.
Normal
men have an instinctively protective nature when it comes to children.
There are exceptions, of course, and normal men know that and want to
protect children from those exceptions.
Normal women also have the same protective nature.
That's why we have the laws we
have.
Ricky thinks the law is unfair; he thinks the kid is the one to blame
more-so than the adult - the brilliant little seductress!
I had this debate with Doc and Ricky about a year ago. As I did then,
I'd be saying the things I've been saying whether you were here
posting or not.
Okay, this is good to know. And you do sound sincere in your posts on
this topic. I just had to ask and make sure because of the Political
divide I mentioned.
But I'm glad you're here to express your opinion.
And
it's really interesting that they felt the need to question your
motivation. If they believe a woman would *only* tell them they're
wrong because she had personally been taken advantage of, as a child,
by an older man -- doesn't that demonstrate that they *know* the
behavior they support is wrong?
This area I'm not touching on.
Dani
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underagesex!! |
30 Jan 2008 07:59:28 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:50:06 -0800, danisnewlover wrote:
On Jan 28, 11:17 am, "psychogaray" <psychovi...@comcast.net> wrote:
You are the sick mind Doc!!!
The more this group know, the more it is expose
all the child sexers here, you, the Wolf, the WH,
the Lemke, the Per3id in fact it seem that most
of the male here are child sexers!!!
Maybe 3 or 4 of the male here seem like the normal,
the other all seek the little girl!!!
I like to see how the female in this group to feel
about this???
Of course it's revolting. But then again, Playboy centerfolds are usually
only 18 or so, which also seems gross to me. (Not as sick, but there's a
definite "ewww" factor in there), but that's perfectly legal and socially
acceptable, so what do I know? (And since I brought up Playboy - really,
what 18 year old needs airbrushing?!?)
Same goes for older women who go after boys of the same age group. Just -
eww.
I think that Ricky and Gary are pulling your leg, though. I don't know
about Gary's status, but Ricky seems to be happily married to a woman in
his own age bracket.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "psychogaray" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex !! |
31 Jan 2008 06:14:55 AM |
|
|
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:47a12b80$0$22871$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:50:06 -0800, danisnewlover wrote:
On Jan 28, 11:17 am, "psychogaray" <psychovi...@comcast.net> wrote:
You are the sick mind Doc!!!
The more this group know, the more it is expose
all the child sexers here, you, the Wolf, the WH,
the Lemke, the Per3id in fact it seem that most
of the male here are child sexers!!!
Maybe 3 or 4 of the male here seem like the normal,
the other all seek the little girl!!!
I like to see how the female in this group to feel
about this???
Of course it's revolting. But then again, Playboy centerfolds are usually
only 18 or so, which also seems gross to me. (Not as sick, but there's a
definite "ewww" factor in there), but that's perfectly legal and socially
acceptable, so what do I know? (And since I brought up Playboy - really,
what 18 year old needs airbrushing?!?)
Same goes for older women who go after boys of the same age group. Just -
eww.
I think that Ricky and Gary are pulling your leg, though. I don't know
about Gary's status, but Ricky seems to be happily married to a woman in
his own age bracket.
Woods
I'm single and spend all my spare time hanging around school yards with bags
of fudge candy for the preteens, I-Pods for the middle schoolers, and drugs,
booze, and cash for the high school kids.
It really tires me out sometimes, but if I don't do it, someone else will...
garay ;))~
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex!! |
31 Jan 2008 09:00:02 AM |
|
|
On Jan 31, 7:14 am, "psychogaray" <psychovi...@comcast.net> wrote:
"Woodswun" <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:47a12b80$0$22871$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:50:06 -0800, danisnewlover wrote:
On Jan 28, 11:17 am, "psychogaray" <psychovi...@comcast.net> wrote:
You are the sick mind Doc!!!
The more this group know, the more it is expose
all the child sexers here, you, the Wolf, the WH,
the Lemke, the Per3id in fact it seem that most
of the male here are child sexers!!!
Maybe 3 or 4 of the male here seem like the normal,
the other all seek the little girl!!!
I like to see how the female in this group to feel
about this???
Of course it's revolting. But then again, Playboy centerfolds are usually
only 18 or so, which also seems gross to me. (Not as sick, but there's a
definite "ewww" factor in there), but that's perfectly legal and socially
acceptable, so what do I know? (And since I brought up Playboy - really,
what 18 year old needs airbrushing?!?)
Same goes for older women who go after boys of the same age group. Just -
eww.
I think that Ricky and Gary are pulling your leg, though. I don't know
about Gary's status, but Ricky seems to be happily married to a woman in
his own age bracket.
Woods
I'm single and spend all my spare time hanging around school yards with bags
of fudge candy for the preteens, I-Pods for the middle schoolers, and drugs,
booze, and cash for the high school kids.
It really tires me out sometimes, but if I don't do it, someone else will...
Good for you to tell the truth, now you can get the help
for you sick mind!!!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underagesex !! |
01 Feb 2008 01:11:59 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 04:14:55 -0800, psychogaray wrote:
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:47a12b80$0$22871$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:50:06 -0800, danisnewlover wrote:
On Jan 28, 11:17 am, "psychogaray" <psychovi...@comcast.net> wrote:
You are the sick mind Doc!!!
The more this group know, the more it is expose
all the child sexers here, you, the Wolf, the WH,
the Lemke, the Per3id in fact it seem that most
of the male here are child sexers!!!
Maybe 3 or 4 of the male here seem like the normal,
the other all seek the little girl!!!
I like to see how the female in this group to feel
about this???
Of course it's revolting. But then again, Playboy centerfolds are usually
only 18 or so, which also seems gross to me. (Not as sick, but there's a
definite "ewww" factor in there), but that's perfectly legal and socially
acceptable, so what do I know? (And since I brought up Playboy - really,
what 18 year old needs airbrushing?!?)
Same goes for older women who go after boys of the same age group. Just -
eww.
I think that Ricky and Gary are pulling your leg, though. I don't know
about Gary's status, but Ricky seems to be happily married to a woman in
his own age bracket.
Woods
I'm single and spend all my spare time hanging around school yards with bags
of fudge candy for the preteens, I-Pods for the middle schoolers, and drugs,
booze, and cash for the high school kids.
It really tires me out sometimes, but if I don't do it, someone else will...
garay ;))~
Geez ..... 9_9
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex !! |
30 Jan 2008 10:19:18 PM |
|
|
On 31 Jan 2008 01:59:28 GMT, Woodswun <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:50:06 -0800, danisnewlover wrote:
On Jan 28, 11:17 am, "psychogaray" <psychovi...@comcast.net> wrote:
You are the sick mind Doc!!!
The more this group know, the more it is expose
all the child sexers here, you, the Wolf, the WH,
the Lemke, the Per3id in fact it seem that most
of the male here are child sexers!!!
Maybe 3 or 4 of the male here seem like the normal,
the other all seek the little girl!!!
I like to see how the female in this group to feel
about this???
Of course it's revolting. But then again, Playboy centerfolds are usually
only 18 or so, which also seems gross to me. (Not as sick, but there's a
definite "ewww" factor in there), but that's perfectly legal and socially
acceptable, so what do I know? (And since I brought up Playboy - really,
what 18 year old needs airbrushing?!?)
We're not talking about 18 year olds that pose for Playboy, Woods.
We're talking about grown adults that have sex with 14 year old kids.
And then to add massive insult to injury, Ricky believes that it's the
*kid's* fault more-so than the adult's fault because it's simply
"nature" - the adult is being manipulated and seduced by the kid and
can't say no to her/his advances.
Same goes for older women who go after boys of the same age group. Just -
eww.
Any adult, both females and males.
I think that Ricky and Gary are pulling your leg, though.
Ricky is serious.
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex!! |
31 Jan 2008 08:57:57 AM |
|
|
On Jan 30, 11:19 pm, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 31 Jan 2008 01:59:28 GMT, Woodswun <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:50:06 -0800, danisnewlover wrote:
On Jan 28, 11:17 am, "psychogaray" <psychovi...@comcast.net> wrote:
You are the sick mind Doc!!!
The more this group know, the more it is expose
all the child sexers here, you, the Wolf, the WH,
the Lemke, the Per3id in fact it seem that most
of the male here are child sexers!!!
Maybe 3 or 4 of the male here seem like the normal,
the other all seek the little girl!!!
I like to see how the female in this group to feel
about this???
Of course it's revolting. But then again, Playboy centerfolds are usually
only 18 or so, which also seems gross to me. (Not as sick, but there's a
definite "ewww" factor in there), but that's perfectly legal and socially
acceptable, so what do I know? (And since I brought up Playboy - really,
what 18 year old needs airbrushing?!?)
We're not talking about 18 year olds that pose for Playboy, Woods.
We're talking about grown adults that have sex with 14 year old kids.
And then to add massive insult to injury, Ricky believes that it's the
*kid's* fault more-so than the adult's fault because it's simply
"nature" - the adult is being manipulated and seduced by the kid and
can't say no to her/his advances.
Same goes for older women who go after boys of the same age group. Just -
eww.
Any adult, both females and males.
I think that Ricky and Gary are pulling your leg, though.
Ricky is serious.
Dani
Yes, the Wolf and the Doc are serious, so we know they are sick
in the mind!!!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underagesex !! |
01 Feb 2008 01:05:01 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 04:19:18 +0000, Dani wrote:
On 31 Jan 2008 01:59:28 GMT, Woodswun <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:50:06 -0800, danisnewlover wrote:
On Jan 28, 11:17 am, "psychogaray" <psychovi...@comcast.net> wrote:
You are the sick mind Doc!!!
The more this group know, the more it is expose
all the child sexers here, you, the Wolf, the WH,
the Lemke, the Per3id in fact it seem that most
of the male here are child sexers!!!
Maybe 3 or 4 of the male here seem like the normal,
the other all seek the little girl!!!
I like to see how the female in this group to feel
about this???
Of course it's revolting. But then again, Playboy centerfolds are usually
only 18 or so, which also seems gross to me. (Not as sick, but there's a
definite "ewww" factor in there), but that's perfectly legal and socially
acceptable, so what do I know? (And since I brought up Playboy - really,
what 18 year old needs airbrushing?!?)
We're not talking about 18 year olds that pose for Playboy, Woods.
We're talking about grown adults that have sex with 14 year old kids.
And then to add massive insult to injury, Ricky believes that it's the
*kid's* fault more-so than the adult's fault because it's simply
"nature" - the adult is being manipulated and seduced by the kid and
can't say no to her/his advances.
Well, in some states it's legal for a 14 year old to marry, so even though
we find it repulsive, it's apparently not quite so clearcut as to whether
it's "wrong" or not. My personal opinion is that any parent that consents
to their kid getting married is an unfit parent, regardless of how old
that kid is.
Ricky's comments are not entirely without merit, IMHO. There are some
cases where very young girls deliberately set out to go after men, and
they don't look nearly as young as they are. Of course, once the man
finds out how young she is, he's responsible for hightailing it out of
there, but yeah, there are girls like that.
Same goes for older women who go after boys of the same age group. Just
- eww.
Any adult, both females and males.
Yep.
I think that Ricky and Gary are pulling your leg, though.
Ricky is serious.
If so, I would have to disagree with him on that. Your frontal lobe isn't
developed until around age 25, which makes the over-25 person responsible
for taking on more of a big brother/sister role and telling the kid a few
things about risks.
Woods
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "psychogaray" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex !! |
01 Feb 2008 01:23:44 PM |
|
|
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:47a36d5d$0$4930$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 04:19:18 +0000, Dani wrote:
On 31 Jan 2008 01:59:28 GMT, Woodswun <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:50:06 -0800, danisnewlover wrote:
On Jan 28, 11:17 am, "psychogaray" <psychovi...@comcast.net> wrote:
You are the sick mind Doc!!!
The more this group know, the more it is expose
all the child sexers here, you, the Wolf, the WH,
the Lemke, the Per3id in fact it seem that most
of the male here are child sexers!!!
Maybe 3 or 4 of the male here seem like the normal,
the other all seek the little girl!!!
I like to see how the female in this group to feel
about this???
Of course it's revolting. But then again, Playboy centerfolds are
usually
only 18 or so, which also seems gross to me. (Not as sick, but there's
a
definite "ewww" factor in there), but that's perfectly legal and socially
acceptable, so what do I know? (And since I brought up Playboy - really,
what 18 year old needs airbrushing?!?)
We're not talking about 18 year olds that pose for Playboy, Woods.
We're talking about grown adults that have sex with 14 year old kids.
And then to add massive insult to injury, Ricky believes that it's the
*kid's* fault more-so than the adult's fault because it's simply
"nature" - the adult is being manipulated and seduced by the kid and
can't say no to her/his advances.
Well, in some states it's legal for a 14 year old to marry, so even though
we find it repulsive, it's apparently not quite so clearcut as to whether
it's "wrong" or not. My personal opinion is that any parent that consents
to their kid getting married is an unfit parent, regardless of how old
that kid is.
Ricky's comments are not entirely without merit, IMHO. There are some
cases where very young girls deliberately set out to go after men, and
they don't look nearly as young as they are. Of course, once the man
finds out how young she is, he's responsible for hightailing it out of
there, but yeah, there are girls like that.
If you know their names and addresses and phone numbers, pass it along to
me. I'll try to correct their wayward, dangerous, immoral behaviour before
they end up as porno queens, strippers, and at the Chicken Ranch.
OK? I need to do something positive to redeem my badly tarnished reputation.
garay ;))~~
Same goes for older women who go after boys of the same age group. Just
- eww.
Any adult, both females and males.
Yep.
I think that Ricky and Gary are pulling your leg, though.
Ricky is serious.
If so, I would have to disagree with him on that. Your frontal lobe isn't
developed until around age 25, which makes the over-25 person responsible
for taking on more of a big brother/sister role and telling the kid a few
things about risks.
Woods
Dani
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex !! |
01 Feb 2008 05:40:22 PM |
|
|
On 01 Feb 2008 19:05:01 GMT, Woodswun <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 04:19:18 +0000, Dani wrote:
On 31 Jan 2008 01:59:28 GMT, Woodswun <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:50:06 -0800, danisnewlover wrote:
On Jan 28, 11:17 am, "psychogaray" <psychovi...@comcast.net> wrote:
You are the sick mind Doc!!!
The more this group know, the more it is expose
all the child sexers here, you, the Wolf, the WH,
the Lemke, the Per3id in fact it seem that most
of the male here are child sexers!!!
Maybe 3 or 4 of the male here seem like the normal,
the other all seek the little girl!!!
I like to see how the female in this group to feel
about this???
Of course it's revolting. But then again, Playboy centerfolds are usually
only 18 or so, which also seems gross to me. (Not as sick, but there's a
definite "ewww" factor in there), but that's perfectly legal and socially
acceptable, so what do I know? (And since I brought up Playboy - really,
what 18 year old needs airbrushing?!?)
We're not talking about 18 year olds that pose for Playboy, Woods.
We're talking about grown adults that have sex with 14 year old kids.
And then to add massive insult to injury, Ricky believes that it's the
*kid's* fault more-so than the adult's fault because it's simply
"nature" - the adult is being manipulated and seduced by the kid and
can't say no to her/his advances.
Well, in some states it's legal for a 14 year old to marry, so even though
we find it repulsive, it's apparently not quite so clearcut as to whether
it's "wrong" or not. My personal opinion is that any parent that consents
to their kid getting married is an unfit parent, regardless of how old
that kid is.
Absolutely. Awful, terrible parents.
Ricky's comments are not entirely without merit, IMHO. There are some
cases where very young girls deliberately set out to go after men, and
they don't look nearly as young as they are. Of course, once the man
finds out how young she is, he's responsible for hightailing it out of
there, but yeah, there are girls like that.
Right. If the kid looks and acts much older, then lies to the adult,
giving 18 as their age, then no it's not the adult's fault. She or he
was under a false impression. But I'm afraid Ricky still thinks it's
a-okay because the adult is being manipulated and seduced and tempted;
she or he is caught at a "weak" moment and can't resist the natural
urge.
Same goes for older women who go after boys of the same age group. Just
- eww.
Any adult, both females and males.
Yep.
I think that Ricky and Gary are pulling your leg, though.
Ricky is serious.
If so, I would have to disagree with him on that. Your frontal lobe isn't
developed until around age 25,
Yup! I told him that no matter what they may look like, that
*mentally* and emotionally they are still kids.
which makes the over-25 person responsible
for taking on more of a big brother/sister role and telling the kid a few
things about risks.
Absolutely.
Cheers,
Dani
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex!! |
02 Feb 2008 06:58:13 AM |
|
|
On 1 Feb, 19:05, Woodswun <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote:
Ricky's comments are not entirely without merit, IMHO. =EF=BF=BDThere are =
some
cases where very young girls deliberately set out to go after men, and
they don't look nearly as young as they are. =EF=BF=BDOf course, once the =
man
finds out how young she is, he's responsible for hightailing it out of
there, but yeah, there are girls like that.
Thanks Woodsy, I'm glad that you see I have some point to make. Sadly,
that point has been altered and interpreted in a style rather
different to the intention.
A last post on the matter, regarding the frontal lobe and it's
development. That's quite a suprising fact, I didn't know that.
I think there should be more research to confirm this, and if it is
found to be the case, then the law certainly needs to be altered.
25 has to replace 18 as the age to vote, to die for your Country etc.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underagesex!! |
02 Feb 2008 08:34:55 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 04:58:13 -0800, Werewolfy wrote:
On 1 Feb, 19:05, Woodswun <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote:
Ricky's comments are not entirely without merit, IMHO. �There are some
cases where very young girls deliberately set out to go after men, and
they don't look nearly as young as they are. �Of course, once the man
finds out how young she is, he's responsible for hightailing it out of
there, but yeah, there are girls like that.
Thanks Woodsy, I'm glad that you see I have some point to make. Sadly,
that point has been altered and interpreted in a style rather
different to the intention.
A last post on the matter, regarding the frontal lobe and it's
development. That's quite a suprising fact, I didn't know that.
I think there should be more research to confirm this, and if it is
found to be the case, then the law certainly needs to be altered.
25 has to replace 18 as the age to vote, to die for your Country etc.
Werewolfy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frontal_lobe
http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/teenage-brain-a-work-in-progress.shtml
It explains a lot about the way college students, and young soldiers, act
the way they do. They really are not completely responsible for their
actions just yet, since they are not physiologically capable of
making responsible decisions, although we hold them to that standard.
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex !! |
02 Feb 2008 08:48:04 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 04:58:13 -0800 (PST), Werewolfy
<Werewolfy1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 1 Feb, 19:05, Woodswun <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote:
Ricky's comments are not entirely without merit, IMHO. ?There are some
cases where very young girls deliberately set out to go after men, and
they don't look nearly as young as they are. ?Of course, once the man
finds out how young she is, he's responsible for hightailing it out of
there, but yeah, there are girls like that.
Thanks Woodsy, I'm glad that you see I have some point to make. Sadly,
that point has been altered and interpreted in a style rather
different to the intention.
So when you said this:
"Well, there you are Dani. Horrified you have to be. I stand by my
views, as you by yours.
I am discussing those occasions when a teen-aged girl makes concerted
advances, plots and plans to lure her chosen 'victim' into a private
place, and there to seduce him in a way that most men would find great
difficulty in opposing.
It happens a lot. Were it not for the girl's promiscuous behaviour,
then there would have been no contact.
Those circumstances call for punishing the child as much, if not more
than the man. It's easy to say, 'rebuff her'...in practice, the girls
are very skilled, very artful and very difficult to dislodge.
Temptation is strong on matters such as these. That temptation had
nothing to do with the man, and everything to do with the girl.
A child is deemed capable of 'aiding, abetting, counseling and
procuring' any offence. However, in practice, and in order to convict
the man, this law is not applied in these cases.
It should be."
Werewolfy
So, when you made that post, you were referring to *only* times when
the man didn't know the girl's real age?
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex!! |
02 Feb 2008 04:23:58 PM |
|
|
On 2 Feb, 14:48, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
So, when you made that post, you were referring to *only* times when
the man didn't know the girl's real age?
Leave it Dani. I won't ask you again.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex!! |
05 Feb 2008 01:48:53 AM |
|
|
On Feb 2, 5:23 pm, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 2 Feb, 14:48, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
So, when you made that post, you were referring to *only* times when
the man didn't know the girl's real age?
Leave it Dani. I won't ask you again.
Werewolfy
Oh the Big Mouth make the threats again to the woman???
Big tough Douche Bag who hide in his house like to make
the tough with the woman, yes???
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Something to make you sicker than our sick debate on underage sex !! |
05 Feb 2008 11:23:22 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 14:23:58 -0800 (PST), Werewolfy
<Werewolfy1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 2 Feb, 14:48, Dani <d.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
So, when you made that post, you were referring to *only* times when
the man didn't know the girl's real age?
Leave it Dani. I won't ask you again.
Oh gee, and I wonder just why you want me to leave it. You were
pretending to agree with Woods and you told her that what she was
saying is the exact point you have been trying to get across all
along. But she's under the impression that you're referring to the
times when the kid lies and gives a false age (18 years) .. and THAT
is why she agreed with you.
But that isn't what you're saying, is it, Ricky? You won't answer my
question because you're saying it's still okay if the adult knows the
real age of the kid.
Oh, and as far as your statement: "Nature is more powerful than any
law" .. We also have the fight/flight instinct. Imagine if when you
were working as a cop, a man assaulted someone and when you went to
aresst him, he looked at you and said: "My fight or flight instinct
kicked in but the fight instinct won so I beat him!!" Would your
theory matter in that case? Or would you still aresst him?
Dani
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
