After reading the terribly tear-jerking story from Werewolfy about his
wayward daughter's sexual wantonness, we at *Soulutions* have come up with
a possible answer to his agonizing problem.
Any horny daughter can easily be controlled by a new product we offer in
our expanding line of "Anti-Nymphomaniac Appliances." (Catalog A-5)
Chastity belts are nothing new, and have been occasionally employed to
control female horniness (or "indiscretion") for centuries. However,
*Soulutions* has advanced the technology for the first time since the
original "key lock" chastity belt was invented. It was always possible the
wearer might be able to pick the lock and continue her rampant
lasciviousness (and then refasten the belt).
We offer our *Chastity 2006 XLT* belt which has a electronic key lock,
much the same as popular mass-produced automobiles have had for years.
Combined with a state-of-the-art flexible titanium contruction, the
titanium *Chastity 2006 XLT* belt by *Soulutions* is virtually unlockable
by the wearer and indestructible.
Over 1,000,000 variations of the security lock are programmed into the key
control unit -- which, additionally, can be accessed by a wireless remote
control unit.
Now, for the first time in human history, parents of daughters with
uncontrollable obsessive sexual desires can effectively keep their beloved
offspring from engaging in rampant promiscuity -- which can lead unwanted
pregnancies, AIDS, and veneral diseases
Since your daughter is unlikely to volunteer to use the device, and it
would be a likely fierce violent battle to force it on her, we at
*Soulutions* have added, without additional cost, a small sample supply of
the drug, Rophynol, which can be easily slipped into your daughter's food
or drink, without detection by taste.
It will put her into a deep restful sleep -- providing the perfect
opportunity to fasten the *Chastity 2006 XLT" belt to her libidinous
pelvic region.
Only $119, shipping included. It's the perfect *Soulution* to soothing the
troubled souls of worried parents.
http://www.soulutions.com/chastity2006xlt.html
.
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: *SOULUTIONS* HAS THE ANSWER TO WEREWOLFY'S PROBLEM !! |
13 May 2006 07:08:36 PM |
|
|
"....we at *Soulutions* have come up with a possible answer to his
agonizing problem....."
It's an amusing enough post..and on the surface harmless too.
That depends on your circumstance though. That which might cause a
smile to a by-stander, may well incite the opposite reaction in any
father who found his life's guidance and moral efforts to be a simple
waste of the last 19 years.
Should any father of a daughter be reading this, perhaps they too would
find little to smile about.
Throw in two messy and all-but successful suicide attempts as a result
of her passionate nature, the worries and indescribable fears that
persist...Then a smile becomes harder still to find.
Werewolfy
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doc" |
|
| Title: Re: *SOULUTIONS* HAS THE ANSWER TO WEREWOLFY'S PROBLEM !! |
13 May 2006 07:33:35 PM |
|
|
"Werewolfy" <thegrimreaper10@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1147565316.586523.309600@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
"....we at *Soulutions* have come up with a possible answer to his
agonizing problem....."
It's an amusing enough post..and on the surface harmless too.
That depends on your circumstance though. That which might cause a
smile to a by-stander, may well incite the opposite reaction in any
father who found his life's guidance and moral efforts to be a simple
waste of the last 19 years.
Should any father of a daughter be reading this, perhaps they too would
find little to smile about.
Throw in two messy and all-but successful suicide attempts as a result
of her passionate nature, the worries and indescribable fears that
persist...Then a smile becomes harder still to find.
Werewolfy
Werewolfy
Well, I have tragically lost my parents years ago and while "black humor"
about the circumstances of their deaths may not be appropriate to those
who have been personally traumatized, I still find laughter in the nature
of such humor despite my suffering over the incident. For those who've not
gone through a family crisis or trajedy, and who've encountered such
humor, it may, indeed, be more humorous. In any case, when a person
publicly reveals their personal or family "skeletons," trajedies, mental
aberrations, etc., any responsibility for inappropriate or negative
reaction to it can be as much laid upon the revealer as the revealee (to
coin a term).
Choosing not to reveal one's very personal and very private life in any
public forum is the first defense (if not the ultimate "soulution")
against receiving something unpleasant in response, whether it be an
errant attempt at benign humor, or outright destructive defamation.
In this case, the post was meant to be humorous. If it had meant to be
something else, it would not be "harmless."
But, I'm glad it extracted a smile or two, despite reservations as to the
nature of it.
Doc
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: *SOULUTIONS* HAS THE ANSWER TO WEREWOLFY'S PROBLEM !! |
14 May 2006 12:02:21 PM |
|
|
"Doc" <bushelsofbushrot@HellsHereNow.com> wrote in message
news:e45tt20107d@enews2.newsguy.com...
"Werewolfy" <thegrimreaper10@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1147565316.586523.309600@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
"....we at *Soulutions* have come up with a possible answer to his
agonizing problem....."
It's an amusing enough post..and on the surface harmless too.
That depends on your circumstance though. That which might cause a
smile to a by-stander, may well incite the opposite reaction in any
father who found his life's guidance and moral efforts to be a simple
waste of the last 19 years.
Should any father of a daughter be reading this, perhaps they too would
find little to smile about.
Throw in two messy and all-but successful suicide attempts as a result
of her passionate nature, the worries and indescribable fears that
persist...Then a smile becomes harder still to find.
Werewolfy
Werewolfy
Well, I have tragically
<snip>
There's a place for humor and, I suppose, there's a place for classless,
insensitive trash. So, I suppose, you are what you breed.
If sticking a hot poker into a wound this intimate is funny then the amused
is clearly a juvenile. Anyone who has experienced anything deeply painful
and then finds fun in another's wound is so devoid of character that they
can't learn anything from the most intimate personal pain.
I was going to welcome you back, Ricky, but at this point I don't think this
place is terribly welcome.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: *SOULUTIONS* HAS THE ANSWER TO WEREWOLFY'S PROBLEM !! |
14 May 2006 02:20:03 PM |
|
|
"I was going to welcome you back, Ricky, but at this point I don't
think this
place is terribly welcome."
You just did, John.
Thank you.
It's an odd feeling being back in England. Odd because I don't feel any
real sense of 'belonging'. I thought that I would fit in quite
naturally, but so far, the opposite is the case! I suspect the main
difference is that prior to leaving the UK, I must have had a
reasonable degree of patriotism to cloud reality. Now, I look at people
as, well, as people.. without any bias, for, or against.
I see the faults and direction of the UK in a different light.
The unanswered question is whether England has changed in the last 18
years, or is the change in me only? Perhaps it's a combination of the
two.
That said, there are some very nice people around...but rather too many
uncouth types, especially amongst women, for my taste.
Anyway, there's is always 'selective' association, or a return to my
old hermit-like ways ;) Quantoxhead, a few miles away, provides a
magnificent sand/lime stone cliff against the sea, and is full of
fossils....that seems to be an interesting pastime.
I'm embarking on my cricket 'career' again. Age will not deter ;)
Judith is a lot better now. The events of 2005 had seriously affected
her health, but the change is remarkable since arriving in England.
In normal day-to day living, it's just about unknown for me to discuss
anything of a personal nature. I have in here though. Not because I
want to....it's because I need to.
Thank you again John. It's refreshing to come across a man who
understands.
Ricky
.
|
|
|
| User: "=?utf-8?B?V29ybGQgV2FyIElJSSAyMDA2IFtUaGUgTGFzdCAyNDAwIERheXNd4pml4oSi?=" |
|
| Title: Re: *SOULUTIONS* HAS THE ANSWER TO WEREWOLFY'S PROBLEM !! |
14 May 2006 09:58:03 PM |
|
|
Yes, Welcome back, Ricky !!!
I would dearly luv to see all the regularz back here posting again just
like the good ol' dayz from 2001 thru to 2005 -- when this group seemed
to have more meaningfullness & the regularz stayed here more often....
Today, this group seems rather empty with far too many "drop-ins" &
peoplez flaming one another -- when U don't already know them....
I hate it when U just get "drop-ins" or "fly-by-nighters" who don't
really care about this group & start criticizing others for no apparent
reason.....
But U r always welcome here, Ricky, & U r counted az one of the
"regularz" !
Welcome back once again !!!
HOOROO
UNCLE WALLY
----0----
.
|
|
|
| User: "=?utf-8?B?V29ybGQgV2FyIElJSSAyMDA2IFtUaGUgTGFzdCAyNDAwIERheXNd4pml4oSi?=" |
|
| Title: Re: *SOULUTIONS* HAS THE ANSWER TO WEREWOLFY'S PROBLEM !! |
14 May 2006 10:07:17 PM |
|
|
PS, I miss my sweetness !!!
& Little Buddy too !!!
God, I even miss Piglet (Guttermouth Guernon) !!! ;-)
Geez, I need to take a *long* break from this group !!
HOOROO
UNCLE WALLY
----0----
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "G-Ray" |
|
| Title: Re: *SOULUTIONS* HAS THE ANSWER TO WEREWOLFY'S PROBLEM !! |
14 May 2006 10:27:34 PM |
|
|
World War III 2006 [The Last 2400 Days]=E2=99=A5=E2=84=A2 wrote:
Yes, Welcome back, Ricky !!!
I would dearly luv to see all the regularz back here posting again just
like the good ol' dayz from 2001 thru to 2005 -- when this group seemed
to have more meaningfullness & the regularz stayed here more often....
Today, this group seems rather empty with far too many "drop-ins" &
peoplez flaming one another -- when U don't already know them....
I hate it when U just get "drop-ins" or "fly-by-nighters" who don't
really care about this group & start criticizing others for no apparent
reason.....
But U r always welcome here, Ricky, & U r counted az one of the
"regularz" !
Welcome back once again !!!
HOOROO
UNCLE WALLY
----0----
I, Satan, welcome weirdo Ricky back, too. I get a kick outta' watching
the reaction of his neighbors to his strange backyard activities.
Satan >:)~
.
|
|
|
| User: "Satan" |
|
| Title: Re: *SOULUTIONS* HAS THE ANSWER TO WEREWOLFY'S PROBLEM !! |
14 May 2006 10:40:51 PM |
|
|
G-Ray wrote:
World War III 2006 [The Last 2400 Days]=E2=99=A5=E2=84=A2 wrote:
Yes, Welcome back, Ricky !!!
I would dearly luv to see all the regularz back here posting again just
like the good ol' dayz from 2001 thru to 2005 -- when this group seemed
to have more meaningfullness & the regularz stayed here more often....
Today, this group seems rather empty with far too many "drop-ins" &
peoplez flaming one another -- when U don't already know them....
I hate it when U just get "drop-ins" or "fly-by-nighters" who don't
really care about this group & start criticizing others for no apparent
reason.....
But U r always welcome here, Ricky, & U r counted az one of the
"regularz" !
Welcome back once again !!!
HOOROO
UNCLE WALLY
----0----
I, Satan, welcome weirdo Ricky back, too. I get a kick outta' watching
the reaction of his neighbors to his strange backyard activities.
Satan >:)~
You're not Satan, I am!!!! Don't ever try to usurp my authority and
steal my identity again or I will force you to argue every minute
detail of insignificance with Steven Douglas -- a fate worse that Hell
itself!
Satan >:)~
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: *SOULUTIONS* HAS THE ANSWER TO WEREWOLFY'S PROBLEM !! |
15 May 2006 12:21:15 AM |
|
|
"Satan" <francm@mail.com> Spat the Words
G-Ray wrote:
I, Satan, welcome weirdo Ricky back, too. I get a kick outta' watching
the reaction of his neighbors to his strange backyard activities.
Satan >:)~
You're not Satan, I am!!!! Don't ever try to usurp my authority and
steal my identity again or I will force you to argue every minute
detail of insignificance with Steven Douglas -- a fate worse that Hell
itself!
Satan >:)~
Stop talking amongst yourself... this is why you're satan and
not god.
.
|
|
|
| User: "=?utf-8?B?V29ybGQgV2FyIElJSSAyMDA2IFtUaGUgTGFzdCAyNDAwIERheXNd4pml4oSi?=" |
|
| Title: Re: *SOULUTIONS* HAS THE ANSWER TO WEREWOLFY'S PROBLEM !! |
15 May 2006 12:56:19 AM |
|
|
Doc/G-Ray/Satan/Soulutions has MPD (Multiple Personality Disorder)
?!?!?!?
HOOROO
UNCLE WALLY
----0---- (ps, i LOVE THIS KEYBOARD -- SMOOOOOOOOTH AS SILK ;-)
========================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doc" |
|
| Title: Re: *SOULUTIONS* HAS THE ANSWER TO WEREWOLFY'S PROBLEM !! |
15 May 2006 02:44:55 AM |
|
|
"World War III 2006 [The Last 2400 Days]♥™"
<stargatedecember2012@yahoo.ca> wrote in message
news:1147672579.606388.49220@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Doc/G-Ray/Satan/Soulutions has MPD (Multiple Personality Disorder)
?!?!?!?
Yes , I think Doc has MPD.
G-Ray
No, you liar, it's YOU who has MPD!
Doc :))
Will you two stop accusing each other? Neither has MPD. You're both demon
possessed!
Satan >:)~
The obvious soulution to this dilemna is for the ONE REAL person behind
ALL the personalities, stand up and announce to this group his actual
single identity!
*Soulutions*
HOOROO
UNCLE WALLY
----0---- (ps, i LOVE THIS KEYBOARD -- SMOOOOOOOOTH AS SILK ;-)
========================================
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Doc" |
|
| Title: Re: *SOULUTIONS* HAS THE ANSWER TO WEREWOLFY'S PROBLEM !! |
14 May 2006 09:15:06 PM |
|
|
"John Lemke" <jflemke@locallink.net> wrote in message
news:gfGdnWIyfpwD__rZRVn-tQ@locallink.net...
"Doc" <bushelsofbushrot@HellsHereNow.com> wrote in message
news:e45tt20107d@enews2.newsguy.com...
"Werewolfy" <thegrimreaper10@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1147565316.586523.309600@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
"....we at *Soulutions* have come up with a possible answer to his
agonizing problem....."
It's an amusing enough post..and on the surface harmless too.
That depends on your circumstance though. That which might cause a
smile to a by-stander, may well incite the opposite reaction in any
father who found his life's guidance and moral efforts to be a simple
waste of the last 19 years.
Should any father of a daughter be reading this, perhaps they too
would
find little to smile about.
Throw in two messy and all-but successful suicide attempts as a result
of her passionate nature, the worries and indescribable fears that
persist...Then a smile becomes harder still to find.
Werewolfy
Werewolfy
Well, I have tragically
<snip>
There's a place for humor and, I suppose, there's a place for classless,
insensitive trash. So, I suppose, you are what you breed.
And to the receiver of the humor and bystanders, your reaction is one of
interpretation. Some will find it funny. You might consider, and this
applies to Wolfy, too, or anyone else for that matter, that revealing
intimate details of one's personal life in a public forum of, basically,
strangers, and especially about a close family member (in this case), is
something I find odd and rather insensitive towards the family member. I
wouldn't want to have any member of my family potentially embarrassed, or
feel "violated," by the revealing of such intimate details. How does
Danielle feel about having her father tell a bunch of strangers that she
is, esssentially, unable to think well about her sexual impulses'
consequences, or, for that matter, put on "display" (with a pic) as one
who suffers from some kind of mental illness, or social indiscretion.
Women, especially, and traditionally, are particularly sensitive about
this matter.
So, you think I'm a juvenile and acting irresponsibly in my little piece
on his daughter, eh? I'm not her father -- the one who supposedly loves
her and would, reasonably, want to protect her from any kind of harm,
i.e., public disclosure of her private sexual life.
You think what you want about my brand of humor here, but try to think
about the responsibility of parents, too. There's the first line of
defense.
There's no way I can have everyone like every piece of satire or humor I
post here, and I don't (obviously) care to change my ways, despite some
who I interpret as unable to see the absurdity in everyday human
existence -- that is, by the way, the meat of comedic creativity. And I
find Wolfy's revealing of his daughters' mental problems and sexual
activity right in the theater of the absurd.
I don't know what possible advantage he gets, or his daughter, or his
wife, by spilling this intimate stuff out to the Usenet for all to
read...except to derive sympathy and garner considerable attention, which
seems to me to be self-serving in every way.
So, you shits cackle and spit all you want over the "politicial
correctness" of my humorous pieces here, but just try to keep in mind the
bizarre nature of those who provide the "meat" for me to comically
"cook" -- in any way I choose.
So, basically, I say to all who are outraged or disgusted....
***** YOU !!!! SHOVE IT WHERE OL' SOL DOESN'T SHINE !!!!
And I am happy to see Wolfy back, believe it or not. He is a
gifted,interesting man with a keen intelligence...unfortunately, with,
IMO, a bizarre proclivity towards exposing himself and his family with
intimate details that could prove to be "inappropriate" towards respecting
those he cares so much about.
Doc
If sticking a hot poker into a wound this intimate is funny then the
amused is clearly a juvenile. Anyone who has experienced anything
deeply painful and then finds fun in another's wound is so devoid of
character that they can't learn anything from the most intimate
personal pain.
I was going to welcome you back, Ricky, but at this point I don't think
this place is terribly welcome.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: *SOULUTIONS* HAS THE ANSWER TO WEREWOLFY'S PROBLEM !! |
15 May 2006 06:33:39 AM |
|
|
"Doc" <bushelsofbushrot@HellsHereNow.com> wrote in message
news:e48o7c0318d@enews2.newsguy.com...
....
And to the receiver of the humor and bystanders, your reaction is one of
interpretation. Some will find it funny. You might consider, and this
applies to Wolfy, too, or anyone else for that matter, that revealing
intimate details of one's personal life in a public forum of, basically,
strangers, and especially about a close family member (in this case), is
something I find odd and rather insensitive towards the family member. I
wouldn't want to have any member of my family potentially embarrassed, or
feel "violated," by the revealing of such intimate details. How does
Danielle feel about having her father tell a bunch of strangers that she
is, esssentially, unable to think well about her sexual impulses'
consequences, or, for that matter, put on "display" (with a pic) as one
who suffers from some kind of mental illness, or social indiscretion.
Women, especially, and traditionally, are particularly sensitive about
this matter.
So, you think I'm a juvenile and acting irresponsibly in my little piece
on his daughter, eh? I'm not her father -- the one who supposedly loves
her and would, reasonably, want to protect her from any kind of harm,
i.e., public disclosure of her private sexual life.
You think what you want about my brand of humor here, but try to think
about the responsibility of parents, too. There's the first line of
defense.
There's no way I can have everyone like every piece of satire or humor I
post here, and I don't (obviously) care to change my ways, despite some
who I interpret as unable to see the absurdity in everyday human
existence -- that is, by the way, the meat of comedic creativity. And I
find Wolfy's revealing of his daughters' mental problems and sexual
activity right in the theater of the absurd.
I don't know what possible advantage he gets, or his daughter, or his
wife, by spilling this intimate stuff out to the Usenet for all to
read...except to derive sympathy and garner considerable attention, which
seems to me to be self-serving in every way.
So, you shits cackle and spit all you want over the "politicial
correctness" of my humorous pieces here, but just try to keep in mind the
bizarre nature of those who provide the "meat" for me to comically
"cook" -- in any way I choose.
So, basically, I say to all who are outraged or disgusted....
"I'm an eternally unrepentant megalomaniac."
Zanowic went after Wolfy the same way. More than once. That puts your humor
in pretty exclusive company. Same *****, different politics.
It was Amy Caton that first mentioned the problems Wolfy's daughter was
having. Ricky disappeared, Amy came along and explained. When Ricky came
back people started inquiring about her out of concern and compassion.
Apparently he thought this might be a safe place to mention things and it
was until the cockroaches started coming out of the woodwork.
Give up your own chronic masturbation, find a girl, have a daughter
yourself. Find out how hard it can be to raise a kid these days and maybe,
with experience, you'll grow into a little compassion yourself.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doc" |
|
| Title: Re: *SOULUTIONS* HAS THE ANSWER TO WEREWOLFY'S PROBLEM !! |
15 May 2006 09:27:01 PM |
|
|
"John Lemke" <jflemke@locallink.net> wrote in message
news:KJednZB_QKKI-vXZnZ2dnUVZ_vWdnZ2d@locallink.net...
"Doc" <bushelsofbushrot@HellsHereNow.com> wrote in message
news:e48o7c0318d@enews2.newsguy.com...
...
And to the receiver of the humor and bystanders, your reaction is one
of interpretation. Some will find it funny. You might consider, and
this applies to Wolfy, too, or anyone else for that matter, that
revealing intimate details of one's personal life in a public forum of,
basically, strangers, and especially about a close family member (in
this case), is something I find odd and rather insensitive towards the
family member. I wouldn't want to have any member of my family
potentially embarrassed, or feel "violated," by the revealing of such
intimate details. How does Danielle feel about having her father tell a
bunch of strangers that she is, esssentially, unable to think well
about her sexual impulses' consequences, or, for that matter, put on
"display" (with a pic) as one who suffers from some kind of mental
illness, or social indiscretion. Women, especially, and traditionally,
are particularly sensitive about this matter.
So, you think I'm a juvenile and acting irresponsibly in my little
piece on his daughter, eh? I'm not her father -- the one who supposedly
loves her and would, reasonably, want to protect her from any kind of
harm, i.e., public disclosure of her private sexual life.
You think what you want about my brand of humor here, but try to think
about the responsibility of parents, too. There's the first line of
defense.
There's no way I can have everyone like every piece of satire or humor
I post here, and I don't (obviously) care to change my ways, despite
some who I interpret as unable to see the absurdity in everyday human
existence -- that is, by the way, the meat of comedic creativity. And I
find Wolfy's revealing of his daughters' mental problems and sexual
activity right in the theater of the absurd.
I don't know what possible advantage he gets, or his daughter, or his
wife, by spilling this intimate stuff out to the Usenet for all to
read...except to derive sympathy and garner considerable attention,
which seems to me to be self-serving in every way.
So, you shits cackle and spit all you want over the "politicial
correctness" of my humorous pieces here, but just try to keep in mind
the bizarre nature of those who provide the "meat" for me to comically
"cook" -- in any way I choose.
So, basically, I say to all who are outraged or disgusted....
"I'm an eternally unrepentant megalomaniac."
Zanowic went after Wolfy the same way. More than once. That puts your
humor in pretty exclusive company. Same *****, different politics.
It was Amy Caton that first mentioned the problems Wolfy's daughter was
having. Ricky disappeared, Amy came along and explained. When Ricky
came back people started inquiring about her out of concern and
compassion. Apparently he thought this might be a safe place to mention
things and it was until the cockroaches started coming out of the
woodwork.
Give up your own chronic masturbation, find a girl, have a daughter
yourself. Find out how hard it can be to raise a kid these days and
maybe, with experience, you'll grow into a little compassion yourself.
The first thing I'd have as a priority as a concerned father would be to
keep my family members' private lives -- their sexuality and mental
problems -- completely away from public forums, or strangers. I certainly
wouldn't identify them or myself by my/our real name(s), nor post any
photographs.
If I wanted anyone to know about their problems, I'd first explain (and
discuss with them) what I was planning to do, any why, and ask their
permission before proceeding -- if I felt it was so very important to have
the "need" to tell, as Wolfy as mentioned.
And, I'd be examining myself as to how I, and the "affected" family
members, could in any way benefit from such a public disclosure. And all
the "dangers" or "downside" aspects of it.
Finally, I'd be more likely to settle on a psychologist, counselor,
therapist, social worker, priest, or at least a wise ol' family member or
close friend, etc., to hear my or my family's very personal problems.
Now, maybe you get some prurient satisfaction out of hearing such intimate
problems of peoples' private lives, and don't particularly care about
respecting the sanctity of a person's privacy, I don't know or care one
way or the other.
I do know, however, that my piece was meant to be purely a black-humored
effort, and not overtly destructive...which obviously you object to, and
think was a mean-spirited thing. I feel totally okay with the piece I did,
with a clear conscience, and plenty of chuckles to boot. And that is the
way the world turns, fella. You see it your way, I see it mine. We
disagree. Tough turtles.
As far as controlling one's kids past legal age, I'd suggest to you that
you, Wolfy, or any other parent, did whatever you did while they were at
home to "mold" their behavior, and...now...they're on their own, free to
make their mistakes, and suffer the consequences --- as most of us have in
the same stage in life.
Any mistakes a parent made along the way, expressed as guilt or anger, or
possibly public disclosure for sympathy or support, is a very common trait
of parents or guardians. Practically all parents think they could've done
better with their kids' upbringing, or lament some personal problems they
had during that time that may have adversely affected their children.
Welcome to Life 101...
Doc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: *SOULUTIONS* HAS THE ANSWER TO WEREWOLFY'S PROBLEM !! |
16 May 2006 01:51:28 AM |
|
|
"As far as controlling one's kids past legal age, I'd suggest to you
that you, Wolfy, or any other parent, did whatever you did while they
were at home to "mold" their behavior, and...now...they're on their
own, free to make their mistakes, and suffer the consequences --- as
most of us have in the same stage in life."
---------------------------------
No. Legal age or otherwise, one never simply tops being a parent. It's
a 'job for life'.
Oh, you can say to yourself, "They can make their own decisions now".
That is no more than hiding from responsibility. If you love your
children they do not become a passing stranger at 18 years of age. The
care, the worries extend throughout life.
It's harder to influence them of course, to give advice. That makes no
difference when you see the faults that a young lady is making for her
future...The care, the concern remains as strong as when that person
was a vulnerable child.
Doc, you made a very big mistake in writing your 'amusing' story. I
don't believe you were malicious, just thoughtless.
Anyone else would say, "Oh, I'm sorry. It was meant to be amusing, but
I didn't realise the implications when I wrote it, I apologise for any
offence caused."
Not you. Oh no. You have to make weak attempts to deflect 'blame' onto
any and everyone else. Not good old 'Doc' at fault, he's such an
amusing popular chap...isn't he?
Look deeper, Doc.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doc" |
|
| Title: Re: *SOULUTIONS* HAS THE ANSWER TO WEREWOLFY'S PROBLEM !! |
16 May 2006 02:17:24 AM |
|
|
"Werewolfy" <thegrimreaper10@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1147762288.530684.114440@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
"As far as controlling one's kids past legal age, I'd suggest to you
that you, Wolfy, or any other parent, did whatever you did while they
were at home to "mold" their behavior, and...now...they're on their
own, free to make their mistakes, and suffer the consequences --- as
most of us have in the same stage in life."
---------------------------------
No. Legal age or otherwise, one never simply tops being a parent. It's
a 'job for life'.
Oh, you can say to yourself, "They can make their own decisions now".
That is no more than hiding from responsibility. If you love your
children they do not become a passing stranger at 18 years of age. The
care, the worries extend throughout life.
It's harder to influence them of course, to give advice. That makes no
difference when you see the faults that a young lady is making for her
future...The care, the concern remains as strong as when that person
was a vulnerable child.
Doc, you made a very big mistake in writing your 'amusing' story. I
don't believe you were malicious, just thoughtless.
Anyone else would say, "Oh, I'm sorry. It was meant to be amusing, but
I didn't realise the implications when I wrote it, I apologise for any
offence caused."
Not you. Oh no. You have to make weak attempts to deflect 'blame' onto
any and everyone else. Not good old 'Doc' at fault, he's such an
amusing popular chap...isn't he?
Look deeper, Doc.
Werewolfy
It's interesting that you and John both avoid the privacy issue I've
raised. I think you need to look deeper and find what motivates you to not
respect your own family's privacy, and why you've chosen to sidestep that
issue.
Your original response to my piece was that you found it "amusing enough"
and then went on to tell me how it was possibly callous towards folks like
you suffering with children who've gone astray.
Despite your "job for life" as a parent, children are independent beings
once they leave home and have to take responsibility for themselves, lest
they become codependent and "weak" in character. I suspect you're a
perfectionistic person who has a high standard for behavior. Sometimes,
kids rebel against that in various ways. It puts too much pressure on
them. Young people feel a need, almost universally, to experiment with
their new-found freedoms. Any attempt to corral them into a socially
acceptable, or politically correct behavior their parents desire can meet
with unpleasant results, at least initially. Your daughter is still very
young, so she has much to learn about herself and others.
I have nothing to apologize for unless I should begin feeling bad about
creativley expressing a satiric or humorous angle on the vagaries and
absurdities of human behavior. I've never apologized for my brand of humor
in my life and I feel no need to start now. Maybe you should apologize to
your family about stripping them of the privacy they have a right to --
and that protects them.
My attempts to "deflect blame" may be otherwise interpreted as your
attempt to escape any blame and distract yourself by fingering my humorous
efforts here.
Maybe you should probe deeper into yourself, Wolfy...
Doc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: *SOULUTIONS* HAS THE ANSWER TO WEREWOLFY'S PROBLEM !! |
16 May 2006 10:45:01 AM |
|
|
"what motivates you to not respect your own family's privacy, and why
you've chosen to sidestep that issue."
Ignoring stupidity is not 'side-stepping.'
There is no 'ivasion of privacy' when discussing the problems with a
child...no more than when any person, be it Mr Bush or whoever else, is
brought to attention.
My daughter does not frequent this forum, neither, as far as I am
aware, does Mr Bush.
Does honesty upset you Doc? Is it a concept with which you are
unfamiliar? When confronted by this mystical characteristic in a
poster, are you baffled?
No doubt you will just carry on inventing characters and trying to
amuse. There have been times when you do exactly that. Sadly, there are
too many times when you not only fail to amuse, but you alienate your
'readers' through your intransigence.
An unwise move, considering your need for acclaim and admiration.
Qualities such as, 'Understanding', 'Sincerity' and 'Compassion', would
serve you well in this regard. There is a great deal more to life than
making up stories, swapping identities and vieing for verbal supremacy.
Yes. A great deal more.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Doc" |
|
| Title: Re: *SOULUTIONS* HAS THE ANSWER TO WEREWOLFY'S PROBLEM !! |
16 May 2006 07:28:33 PM |
|
|
"Werewolfy" <thegrimreaper10@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1147794301.910036.234030@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
"what motivates you to not respect your own family's privacy, and why
you've chosen to sidestep that issue."
Ignoring stupidity is not 'side-stepping.'
And what exactly is 'stupid' about my asking you why you reveal your
family's real name, your daughter's name, and your wife's, and give your
location of your home, post pictures of yourself and your daughter on
forums easily accessible to anyone with a bit of skill (despite the
"password" BS)...and why, with all that "truth" revealed, that "honesty,"
would you not think that this is an action of peeling away anonymity as
you peel into your family's skeletons? Nothing stupid about what I asked,
but what you are doing certainly is. If you cared about your family, you'd
want to protect them as fully as possible -- considering your
"revelations" about their dysfunctionality. And why in the world would you
think that a forum like APN, well known for its kooks, psychos,
malcontents, et al., would be a good choice to reveal all this personal
information? I'd say you show poor judgement as a father, and, generally,
as a "mature" adult. What are you now, uh, 60 some years old?
Jeez...haven't you learned a damn thing? If your last name is a fake one,
then that would go against your claim of truthfulness and honesty.
There is no 'ivasion of privacy' when discussing the problems with a
child...no more than when any person, be it Mr Bush or whoever else, is
brought to attention.
Your daughter and your family, and you, aren't public figures, unless you
think you've created a public persona like they've done. If you ran for
public office, or were now in one, I can understand your remark.
Otherwise, it's non-applicable.
My daughter does not frequent this forum, neither, as far as I am
aware, does Mr Bush.
That may be true that your daughter is smarter than you and the rest of
us, but still I ask you: what advantage do you think you derive from
public disclosure of your family's private life? Certainly, it generates
much discussion around your "boldness" in presenting your "real life." It
makes you the center of admiration for your alleged truthfulness. How do
we know any of it is true, though? It takes a measure of faith. So, with
no one having met you or interacted with you from this group in physical
reality, how do we really know who you are, and whether you tell the
truth, or are simply a somewhat clever sociopathic personality?
Does honesty upset you Doc? Is it a concept with which you are
unfamiliar? When confronted by this mystical characteristic in a
poster, are you baffled?
It does upset me when it violates the rights of those you supposedly care
so much about. Privacy of a loved one's life is something that is revealed
only when they're consulted and give you permission. I haven't heard of
anything like that from you regarding your wife or daughter. Are they
aware and pleased you're doing this?
No doubt you will just carry on inventing characters and trying to
amuse. There have been times when you do exactly that. Sadly, there are
too many times when you not only fail to amuse, but you alienate your
'readers' through your intransigence.
That's a friggin' laugh. Intransigence. I can't think of hardly anyone
more imbued with that characteristic than you. And arrogance to boot.
Narcissism for a flavorful topping, too. Let's see, maybe I should act
more like I'm your child and ask you for permission to express myself
here, and exactly what will please daddy and what is taboo. Maybe
Danielle's problems partly stem from you trying to put her (and everyone)
into a "box" you can neatly place on your computer room's shelves, along
with your stuffed creatures.
An unwise move, considering your need for acclaim and admiration.
My need? That's another laugh! You have the most driving need for
attention, admiration, and acclaim (much of it self-originated) in this
forum I've ever seen.
I'm not the one who boasts and shows off his sports car and sport cycle,
home, "beautiful" daughter, ad nauseam. And, of course, you'd label me as
envious (as you've already done) -- to which I would reply, "And that is
a further display of your narcissism." I don't envy materialistic
braggarts and privacy violators of their loved ones.
Qualities such as, 'Understanding', 'Sincerity' and 'Compassion', would
serve you well in this regard. There is a great deal more to life than
making up stories, swapping identities and vieing for verbal supremacy.
Oh, and you set yourself up, in your arrogance, as the standard for those
three character traits, in a particularly cunning, well planned program
here that is entirely designed to project that image to your "adoring"
fans. Perhaps, in a haze of Paxil and Valium, it entertains you. The
reviews, however, are mixed.
I've got your number, figuratively speaking, Wolfy, and the phone's
ringin'....
Yes. A great deal more.
Yes, you bet...and a great deal more. I keep asking myself, "Why does this
man ruminate about the bad attitudes and sloppy physical characteristics
of young British girls?" Well, I admit it gives everyone an eye-opening
kick off to a long slimy thread that is, however, essentially, not a
personal revelation but a reveling in oneself.
Doc
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: *SOULUTIONS* HAS THE ANSWER TO WEREWOLFY'S PROBLEM !! |
17 May 2006 09:54:06 AM |
|
|
"I've got your number, figuratively speaking, Wolfy, and the phone's
ringin'.... "
Unlike you, I have no need to conceal myself. I do not suffer from
your form of paranoia. I care not who presents a perceived 'threat'.
Why? Because no one does.
I have no 'hidden skeletons', no concern for passing big bad bogey men,
imps, bats, spectral visions or even pathetic failed 'Doctors' who deal
in goading people.
Why be 'figurative'?
Uk (0033) followed by 1278 433797 will cause my telephone to ring.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chuckie Manson" |
|
| Title: Re: *SOULUTIONS* HAS THE ANSWER TO WEREWOLFY'S PROBLEM !! |
19 May 2006 04:43:56 AM |
|
|
"Werewolfy" <thegrimreaper10@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1147877645.941663.265300@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
"I've got your number, figuratively speaking, Wolfy, and the phone's
ringin'.... "
Unlike you, I have no need to conceal myself. I do not suffer from
your form of paranoia. I care not who presents a perceived 'threat'.
Why? Because no one does.
I have no 'hidden skeletons', no concern for passing big bad bogey men,
imps, bats, spectral visions or even pathetic failed 'Doctors' who deal
in goading people.
Why be 'figurative'?
Uk (0033) followed by 1278 433797 will cause my telephone to ring.
Werewolfy
My, oh my, you are a man among anonymous posters.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: *SOULUTIONS* HAS THE ANSWER TO WEREWOLFY'S PROBLEM !! |
17 May 2006 04:24:09 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 17 May 2006 07:54:06 -0700, Werewolfy wrote:
"I've got your number, figuratively speaking, Wolfy, and the phone's
ringin'.... "
Unlike you, I have no need to conceal myself. I do not suffer from
your form of paranoia. I care not who presents a perceived 'threat'.
Why? Because no one does.
I have no 'hidden skeletons', no concern for passing big bad bogey men,
imps, bats, spectral visions or even pathetic failed 'Doctors' who deal
in goading people.
Why be 'figurative'?
Uk (0033) followed by 1278 433797 will cause my telephone to ring.
Werewolfy
Calling the UK (as well as Ireland, France and Italy) is now free for
Vonage customers in the US - you may actually get a phone call!
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Golden Glen" |
|
| Title: Re: *SOULUTIONS* HAS THE ANSWER TO WEREWOLFY'S PROBLEM !! |
17 May 2006 12:22:19 PM |
|
|
Werewolfy wrote / skrev:
"I've got your number, figuratively speaking, Wolfy, and the phone's
ringin'.... "
Unlike you, I have no need to conceal myself. I do not suffer from
your form of paranoia. I care not who presents a perceived 'threat'.
Why? Because no one does.
I have no 'hidden skeletons', no concern for passing big bad bogey men,
imps, bats, spectral visions or even pathetic failed 'Doctors' who deal
in goading people.
Why be 'figurative'?
Uk (0033) followed by 1278 433797 will cause my telephone to ring.
Werewolfy
That's cool. If everyone followed your style, it would lead to peace on
earth.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: *SOULUTIONS* HAS THE ANSWER TO WEREWOLFY'S PROBLEM !! |
22 May 2006 05:59:37 PM |
|
|
...On Tue, 16 May 2006 17:28:33 -0700, "Doc"
<bushelsofbushrot@HellsHereNow.com> wrote:
"Werewolfy" <thegrimreaper10@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1147794301.910036.234030@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
"what motivates you to not respect your own family's privacy, and why
you've chosen to sidestep that issue."
Ignoring stupidity is not 'side-stepping.'
And what exactly is 'stupid' about my asking you why you reveal your
family's real name, your daughter's name, and your wife's, and give your
location of your home, post pictures of yourself and your daughter on
forums easily accessible to anyone with a bit of skill (despite the
"password" BS)...and why, with all that "truth" revealed, that "honesty,"
would you not think that this is an action of peeling away anonymity as
you peel into your family's skeletons? Nothing stupid about what I asked,
but what you are doing certainly is. If you cared about your family, you'd
want to protect them as fully as possible -- considering your
"revelations" about their dysfunctionality. And why in the world would you
think that a forum like APN, well known for its kooks, psychos,
malcontents, et al., would be a good choice to reveal all this personal
information? I'd say you show poor judgement as a father, and, generally,
as a "mature" adult. What are you now, uh, 60 some years old?
Jeez...haven't you learned a damn thing? If your last name is a fake one,
then that would go against your claim of truthfulness and honesty.
There is no 'ivasion of privacy' when discussing the problems with a
child...no more than when any person, be it Mr Bush or whoever else, is
brought to attention.
Your daughter and your family, and you, aren't public figures, unless you
think you've created a public persona like they've done. If you ran for
public office, or were now in one, I can understand your remark.
Otherwise, it's non-applicable.
My daughter does not frequent this forum, neither, as far as I am
aware, does Mr Bush.
That may be true that your daughter is smarter than you and the rest of
us, but still I ask you: what advantage do you think you derive from
public disclosure of your family's private life? Certainly, it generates
much discussion around your "boldness" in presenting your "real life." It
makes you the center of admiration for your alleged truthfulness. How do
we know any of it is true, though? It takes a measure of faith. So, with
no one having met you or interacted with you from this group in physical
reality, how do we really know who you are, and whether you tell the
truth, or are simply a somewhat clever sociopathic personality?
Does honesty upset you Doc? Is it a concept with which you are
unfamiliar? When confronted by this mystical characteristic in a
poster, are you baffled?
It does upset me when it violates the rights of those you supposedly care
so much about. Privacy of a loved one's life is something that is revealed
only when they're consulted and give you permission. I haven't heard of
anything like that from you regarding your wife or daughter. Are they
aware and pleased you're doing this?
No doubt you will just carry on inventing characters and trying to
amuse. There have been times when you do exactly that. Sadly, there are
too many times when you not only fail to amuse, but you alienate your
'readers' through your intransigence.
That's a friggin' laugh. Intransigence. I can't think of hardly anyone
more imbued with that characteristic than you. And arrogance to boot.
Narcissism for a flavorful topping, too. Let's see, maybe I should act
more like I'm your child and ask you for permission to express myself
here, and exactly what will please daddy and what is taboo. Maybe
Danielle's problems partly stem from you trying to put her (and everyone)
into a "box" you can neatly place on your computer room's shelves, along
with your stuffed creatures.
An unwise move, considering your need for acclaim and admiration.
My need? That's another laugh! You have the most driving need for
attention, admiration, and acclaim (much of it self-originated) in this
forum I've ever seen.
I'm not the one who boasts and shows off his sports car and sport cycle,
home, "beautiful" daughter, ad nauseam. And, of course, you'd label me as
envious (as you've already done) -- to which I would reply, "And that is
a further display of your narcissism." I don't envy materialistic
braggarts and privacy violators of their loved ones.
Nah.. you're really going above and beyond here, Doc. You're not
looking at Ricky's *target* audience who happen to be a select few
here that he feels he's grown close to over the years, and feels
comfort in disclosing personal information to. Of course we have
lurkers; of course there are people outside of Ricky's target audience
that will read the personal things he's written and will be inclined
to use it against him maliciously.
But that's the chance we sometimes take (I say "we" here because I,
amongst others have also shared personal things here).
I don't think Ricky was out of line at all. As I said.. he had a
target audience of a select few here that he's grown close to
through the years and THEY are the ones he was writing to.
Do you get what I'm saying here?
Oh and another thing - from what I've known of Ricky from the past few
years, he would NEVER do anything to ever hurt his daughter in any way
shape or form. Do you think he would post the discussions he's had
about Danielle here if there was even the slightest possibility that
she would ever see it? 'Course not.
You're blowing this way outta proportion when in all actuality, it's
just the same ol' story of a person confiding in others that he knows
care.. and he knows he can trust.
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: *SOULUTIONS* HAS THE ANSWER TO WEREWOLFY'S PROBLEM !! |
22 May 2006 06:30:36 PM |
|
|
"But that's the chance we sometimes take ..."
Hello Dani ;)
You 'read' me very well. Your post was full of those things that were
not for me to say, but for others to understand.
Doc's verbose attempts at a very misguided form of 'comedy', is as
nothing compared to the personal horrors of 2005.
Sometimes, we all need to express ourselves. The presence of malicious
writers who will use such a sad business in order to show how 'clever',
how 'amusing' they are, is a risk I took...and would do so again.
There are quite a few people who care, and it is to those that I
address my 'revelations'.
You sum things up well. Thank you.
Ricky
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: *SOULUTIONS* HAS THE ANSWER TO WEREWOLFY'S PROBLEM !! |
14 May 2006 05:07:02 PM |
|
|
"John Lemke" <jflemke@locallink.net> wrote in message
news:gfGdnWIyfpwD__rZRVn-tQ@locallink.net...
"Doc" <bushelsofbushrot@HellsHereNow.com> wrote in message
news:e45tt20107d@enews2.newsguy.com...
"Werewolfy" <thegrimreaper10@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1147565316.586523.309600@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
"....we at *Soulutions* have come up with a possible answer to his
agonizing problem....."
It's an amusing enough post..and on the surface harmless too.
That depends on your circumstance though. That which might cause a
smile to a by-stander, may well incite the opposite reaction in any
father who found his life's guidance and moral efforts to be a simple
waste of the last 19 years.
Should any father of a daughter be reading this, perhaps they too would
find little to smile about.
Throw in two messy and all-but successful suicide attempts as a result
of her passionate nature, the worries and indescribable fears that
persist...Then a smile becomes harder still to find.
Werewolfy
Werewolfy
Well, I have tragically
<snip>
There's a place for humor and, I suppose, there's a place for classless,
insensitive trash. So, I suppose, you are what you breed.
If sticking a hot poker into a wound this intimate is funny then the
amused is clearly a juvenile. Anyone who has experienced anything deeply
painful and then finds fun in another's wound is so devoid of character
that they can't learn anything from the most intimate personal pain.
I was going to welcome you back, Ricky, but at this point I don't think
this place is terribly welcome.
Nothing is sacred to Doc, unfortunately. I think Ricky knows the rest of us
welcome him back.
Jane
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: *SOULUTIONS* HAS THE ANSWER TO WEREWOLFY'S PROBLEM !! |
14 May 2006 05:45:09 PM |
|
|
" I think Ricky knows the rest of us welcome him back."
That's nice, Jane. Thank you.
We'll have to 'stay around', if only to keep that awful lot from 'Art
Bell' group from their...interference!
It's good to see you too.
Ricky
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: *SOULUTIONS* HAS THE ANSWER TO WEREWOLFY'S PROBLEM !! |
14 May 2006 05:57:12 PM |
|
|
"Werewolfy" <thegrimreaper10@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1147646709.441885.120030@j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
" I think Ricky knows the rest of us welcome him back."
That's nice, Jane. Thank you.
We'll have to 'stay around', if only to keep that awful lot from 'Art
Bell' group from their...interference!
Yes, they are quite a bunch!
It's good to see you too.
Thanks! It was the right thing to do, to leave for awhile...but I'm feeling
better now. Thanks for your support when I left. eric was right that I was
lurking, but wrong that I was posting as someone else.
Jane
Ricky
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Satan" |
|
| Title: Re: *SOULUTIONS* HAS THE ANSWER TO WEREWOLFY'S PROBLEM !! |
15 May 2006 10:34:10 PM |
|
|
Jane wrote:
"John Lemke" <jflemke@locallink.net> wrote in message
news:gfGdnWIyfpwD__rZRVn-tQ@locallink.net...
"Doc" <bushelsofbushrot@HellsHereNow.com> wrote in message
news:e45tt20107d@enews2.newsguy.com...
"Werewolfy" <thegrimreaper10@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1147565316.586523.309600@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
"....we at *Soulutions* have come up with a possible answer to his
agonizing problem....."
It's an amusing enough post..and on the surface harmless too.
That depends on your circumstance though. That which might cause a
smile to a by-stander, may well incite the opposite reaction in any
father who found his life's guidance and moral efforts to be a simple
waste of the last 19 years.
Should any father of a daughter be reading this, perhaps they too would
find little to smile about.
Throw in two messy and all-but successful suicide attempts as a result
of her passionate nature, the worries and indescribable fears that
persist...Then a smile becomes harder still to find.
Werewolfy
Werewolfy
Well, I have tragically
<snip>
There's a place for humor and, I suppose, there's a place for classless,
insensitive trash. So, I suppose, you are what you breed.
If sticking a hot poker into a wound this intimate is funny then the
amused is clearly a juvenile. Anyone who has experienced anything deeply
painful and then finds fun in another's wound is so devoid of character
that they can't learn anything from the most intimate personal pain.
I was going to welcome you back, Ricky, but at this point I don't think
this place is terribly welcome.
Nothing is sacred to Doc, unfortunately. I think Ricky knows the rest of us
welcome him back.
Jane
Doc has built a secret sacred shrine to your filthy underwear, Jane, at
which he worships daily.
Satan >:)~
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "G-Ray" |
|
| Title: Re: *SOULUTIONS* HAS THE ANSWER TO WEREWOLFY'S PROBLEM !! |
14 May 2006 10:30:25 PM |
|
|
Jane wrote:
"John Lemke" <jflemke@locallink.net> wrote in message
news:gfGdnWIyfpwD__rZRVn-tQ@locallink.net...
"Doc" <bushelsofbushrot@HellsHereNow.com> wrote in message
news:e45tt20107d@enews2.newsguy.com...
"Werewolfy" <thegrimreaper10@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1147565316.586523.309600@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
"....we at *Soulutions* have come up with a possible answer to his
agonizing problem....."
It's an amusing enough post..and on the surface harmless too.
That depends on your circumstance though. That which might cause a
smile to a by-stander, may well incite the opposite reaction in any
father who found his life's guidance and moral efforts to be a simple
waste of the last 19 years.
Should any father of a daughter be reading this, perhaps they too would
find little to smile about.
Throw in two messy and all-but successful suicide attempts as a result
of her passionate nature, the worries and indescribable fears that
persist...Then a smile becomes harder still to find.
Werewolfy
Werewolfy
Well, I have tragically
<snip>
There's a place for humor and, I suppose, there's a place for classless,
insensitive trash. So, I suppose, you are what you breed.
If sticking a hot poker into a wound this intimate is funny then the
amused is clearly a juvenile. Anyone who has experienced anything deeply
painful and then finds fun in another's wound is so devoid of character
that they can't learn anything from the most intimate personal pain.
I was going to welcome you back, Ricky, but at this point I don't think
this place is terribly welcome.
Nothing is sacred to Doc, unfortunately. I think Ricky knows the rest of us
welcome him back.
Jane
SATAN LOVES YOU.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Satan" |
|
| Title: Re: *SOULUTIONS* HAS THE ANSWER TO WEREWOLFY'S PROBLEM !! |
14 May 2006 10:48:55 PM |
|
|
G-Ray wrote:
Jane wrote:
"John Lemke" <jflemke@locallink.net> wrote in message
news:gfGdnWIyfpwD__rZRVn-tQ@locallink.net...
"Doc" <bushelsofbushrot@HellsHereNow.com> wrote in message
news:e45tt20107d@enews2.newsguy.com...
"Werewolfy" <thegrimreaper10@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1147565316.586523.309600@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
"....we at *Soulutions* have come up with a possible answer to his
agonizing problem....."
It's an amusing enough post..and on the surface harmless too.
That depends on your circumstance though. That which might cause a
smile to a by-stander, may well incite the opposite reaction in any
father who found his life's guidance and moral efforts to be a simple
waste of the last 19 years.
Should any father of a daughter be reading this, perhaps they too would
find little to smile about.
Throw in two messy and all-but successful suicide attempts as a result
of her passionate nature, the worries and indescribable fears that
persist...Then a smile becomes harder still to find.
Werewolfy
Werewolfy
Well, I have tragically
<snip>
There's a place for humor and, I suppose, there's a place for classless,
insensitive trash. So, I suppose, you are what you breed.
If sticking a hot poker into a wound this intimate is funny then the
amused is clearly a juvenile. Anyone who has experienced anything deeply
painful and then finds fun in another's wound is so devoid of character
that they can't learn anything from the most intimate personal pain.
I was going to welcome you back, Ricky, but at this point I don't think
this place is terribly welcome.
Nothing is sacred to Doc, unfortunately. I think Ricky knows the rest of us
welcome him back.
Jane
SATAN LOVES YOU.
Yes, Satan loves you and welcomes all the "revolving door" quitters
back, whether under the same or another pseudonym. APN is, after all, a
haven for mixed-up people, misfits, psychos, religious fanatics,
chronic masturbators, hypocrites galore, liars, cowards, assholes,
sociopaths, neo-nazis, druggies, alchoholics (both active and
inactive), sensationalists, dummies, schizos, creeps (howdy, Steven!),
fart knockers, retards, failed comedians (whoops!), and so many others
too numerous to list.
Satan loves you ALL !!! hahahhahaaaa....
Satan >:)~
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
