Scientific evidence proves that pre-historic man had some sort of
belief in supernatural deities:
"A growing number of anthropologists and archeo-mythologists argue
that the prevailing ideology of belief in prehistoric Europe and much
of the world was based on the worship of a single earth goddess, who
was assumed to be the fount of all life and who radiated harmony among
all living things." - Al Gore (Earth in the Balance; Ecology and the
Human Spirit)
"Much of the evidence for the existence of this primitive religion
comes from the many thousands of artifacts uncovered in ceremonial
sites. These sites are so widespread that they seem to confirm the
notion that a goddess religion was ubiquitous throughout much of the
world until the antecedents of today's religions - most of which still
have a distinctly masculine orientation - swept out of India and the
Near East, almost obliterating belief in the goddess. The last vestige
of organized goddess worship was eliminated by Christianity" - Al Gore
(Earth in the Balance; Ecology and the Human Spirit)
Yet around 600 B.C. (before the birth of Jesus) and in the name of
"science" men began to employ themselves idiotically in the futile
attempt to remove the notion of the existance of supernatural beings
from the fabric of their current culture...
"The early Greek, or Hellenic, culture marked a different approach to
science. The Ionian natural philosophers removed the gods from the
personal roles they had played in the cosmologies of Babylonia and
Egypt and sought to order the world according to philosophical
principles. Thales of Miletus (6th cent. B.C.) was one of the earliest
of these and contributed to astronomy, geometry, and cosmology. He was
followed by Anaximander, who extended Thales' ideas and proposed that
the universe is composed of four basic elements, i.e., earth, air,
fire, and water; this theory was also taught by Empedocles (5th cent.
B.C.) in Sicily."
http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?method=4&dsid=2222&dekey=Science&gwp=8&curtab=2222_1&linktext=science
Enter Charles Darwin whom many of you think fathered the theory of
evolution. In fact, Darwin pilfered his notions from other scientists,
some who had come before him (such as his grandfather for one):
"Charles Darwin's grandfather, Erasmus Darwin, was one of the leading
intellectuals of eighteenth century England, a man with a remarkable
array of interests and pursuits. Erasmus Darwin was a respected
physician, a well known poet, philosopher, botanist, and naturalist.
As a naturalist, he formulated one of the first formal theories on
evolution in Zoonomia, or, The Laws of Organic Life (1794-1796). He
also presented his evolutionary ideas in verse, in particular in the
posthumously published poem The Temple of Nature."
http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/history/Edarwin.html
For your reading convenience, I dug up that poem. Here it is:
"Organic life beneath the shoreless waves
Was born and nurs'd in ocean's pearly caves;
First forms minute, unseen by spheric glass,
Move on the mud, or pierce the watery mass;
These, as successive generations bloom,
New powers acquire and larger limbs assume;
Whence countless groups of vegetation spring,
And breathing realms of fin and feet and wing."
- Erasmus Darwin. (The Temple of Nature, 1802)
And here, Darwins grandfather clearly (and falsely, in true false
scientific fashion) suggests that all living things "evolved" from a
common ancestor. And I admit being startled myself upon discovering
this tidbit of history since I'd previously blamed Darwin (Charles)
for single handedly corrupting science and everything good about
Biology (which is my secular profession). Professors will not tell you
this stuff. Anyhow here it is. This quote from Charles Darwins
grandfather proves that Darwin himself does not deserve all the
credit (blame) for coming up with the theory (lie) of human evolution
a.k.a... the lie concerning the "common ancestor" theory:
"Would it be too bold to imagine that, in the great length of time
since the earth began to exist, perhaps millions of ages before the
commencement of the history of mankind would it be too bold to imagine
that all warm-blooded animals have arisen from one living filament,
which the great First Cause endued with animality, with the power of
acquiring new parts, attended with new propensities, directed by
irritations, sensations, volitions and associations, and thus
possessing the faculty of continuing to improve by its own inherent
activity, and of delivering down these improvements by generation to
its posterity, world without end!" Erasmus Darwin (Zoönomia, 1794)
http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Erasmus+Darwin
Did you see what he said? Independent organisms which need no God
atall.
So from grandpaw to grandson was the torch to passed in order to
attempt to remove supernatural concepts and possibilities from the
minds of men... all under the disguise of "science":
The lie began to spread (as a tool of the devil) under the name of
"science":
"Ernst Haeckel, much like Herbert Spencer, was always quotable, even
when wrong. Although best known for the famous statement "ontogeny
recapitulates phylogeny", he also coined many words commonly used by
biologists today, such as phylum, phylogeny, and ecology."
"Although trained as a physician, Haeckel abandoned his practice in
1859 after reading Darwin's Origin of Species. Always suspicious of
teleological and mystical explanation, Haeckel used the Origin as
ammunition both to attack entrenched religious dogma and to build his
own unique world view."
http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/history/haeckel.html
On my exact birthday 95 years ago Charles Darwins "Origin of the
Species" was actually published as "On the Origin of Species by Means
of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the
Struggle for Life". So here am I, 95 years later finding myself trying
to correct al these lies as if it were my divine duty.
"First published on 24 November 1859, The Origin of Species (full
title On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the
Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life) by British
naturalist Charles Darwin is one of the pivotal works in scientific
history, and arguably the pre-eminent work in biology. In it, Darwin
makes "one long argument" for his theory that "groups" of organisms,
(which we now call populations) rather than individual organisms,
gradually evolve through the process of natural selection—a mechanism
effectively introduced to the public at large by the book. The work
presents detailed scientific evidence he had accumulated both on the
Voyage of the Beagle in the 1830s and since his return, painstakingly
laying out his theory and refuting the doctrine of "Created kinds"
underlying the theories of Creation biology which were then widely
accepted."
http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/The+Origin+of+Species
Of course. Darwin fell to (pseudo) "science" and became an
X-christian. Formerly, he was a Bible quoting Christian....
"During these two years I was led to think much about religion. Whilst
on board the Beagle I was quite orthodox, and I remember being
heartily laughed at by several of the officers (though themselves
orthodox) for quoting the Bible as an unanswerable authority on some
point of morality." - Charles Darwin (The Autobiography of Charles
Darwin)
However, the devil has finally conceded that man will never easily
relinquish his belief in the supernatural and will never surrender his
God given rights of "faith".
And thus "science", in this modern day and time reverts to mans
earlier primordial superstitions of goddess worship in a last ditch
effort to deceive him:
"In science, a Gaia theory is a class of scientific models of the
biosphere in which life fosters and maintains suitable conditions for
itself by affecting Earth's environment. The first such theory was
created by the English atmospheric scientist James Lovelock in 1969.
He hypothesized that the living matter of the planet functioned like a
single organism and named this self-regulating living system after the
Greek goddess Gaia."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaia_theory_%28science%29
Lovelock was no insignificant scientists seeing that he was employed
at NASA's Jet Propulslsion Lab:
"A lifelong inventor, some of his inventions were adopted by NASA in
their program of planetary exploration. It was while working for NASA
that Lovelock developed the Gaia Hypothesis."
"James Lovelock is the author of approximately 200 scientific papers,
distributed almost equally among topics in Medicine, Biology,
Instrument Science and Geophysiology. He has filed more than 50
patents, mostly for detectors for use in chemical analysis. One of
these, the electron capture detector, was important in the development
of environmental awareness."
"For me, the personal revelation of Gaia came quite suddenly - like a
flash of enlightenment. I was in a small room on the top floor of a
building at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California. It
was the autumn of 1965 ... and I was talking with a colleague, Dian
Hitchcock, about a paper we were preparing ... It was at that moment
that I glimpsed Gaia."
http://www.gaianet.fsbusiness.co.uk/gaiatheory.html
However, this is no great surprise seeing that the Bible perfectly
explains that "evolution" is not the problem, but that "devolution" is
the culprit of the latter days of civilization as we know it. The
"devolution" of mankind is simply summarized as being a state of being
of men by which they have somehow (by democic influence) lost "faith".
"Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some
shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and
doctrines of devils" (1 Timothy 4:1)
comments welcome, as always
Jd A.D. 2006
Anno Domini" is Latin for "in the year of Our Lord", referring to Our
Lord Jesus Christ. That is, "AD 1996" literally means "in the 1996'th
year since the birth of the Christ." Now not all the world is
Christian, so it makes no sense for a Jew, a Moslem, a Hindu, a Witch,
a Druid, or an atheist to refer to the date as being in the year of
"their Lord" when they don't follow him. So "CE" is a more considerate
way of labeling dates in the Gregorian calendar without rubbing
non-Christian's noses in the fact that so much of the world is using a
calendar based on the alleged birth-year of the man we Christians
believe to be the Messiah.
http://www.radix.net/~dglenn/defs/ce.html
.
|
|
| User: "Anno Domini" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
25 Feb 2006 08:45:36 PM |
|
|
Honest John wrote:
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:rko1029qvu61tgqg9jlqdi4car15j68mi8@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:48:53 GMT, in alt.astrology, Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Scientific evidence proves that pre-historic man had some sort of
belief in supernatural deities:
That's not going to take much convincing. Prehistoric, even
pre-industrial, people were commonly superstitious. They made
things up to explain all sorts of things they couldn't understand.
So how do explain the fact that every U.S. President without exception
has acknowledged God?
Why would I NEED to explain it ? Belief in a god is a personal
matter of faith, not something that requires much explanation.
If you're one of those 'Intelligent Design' proponents, I
just want to say I really like your argument... "it's just too
damn complicated to understand life. we can't explain it so we
shouldn't even try." LOVE that argument!!
Let's try this for a brief moment. I'm a Christian who has no problem
sharing my views and explaining them.
What are you?
A Native American who can point to the hate speech which has come
from the mouth of men which speak for your god.
Did you know one of the worst massacre in american history of Native
Americans was led by an so called "Man of God". Actually much of the
hate of the Red Man comes from official position in many of the
churches that Native American's had no soul and couldn't be saved.
I didn't think that until I read the hate in your post!
Have a nice night, APPLE
Yeah. These leeches of society hardly deserve a reply.
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "Honest John" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
25 Feb 2006 08:52:00 PM |
|
|
"Anno Domini" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:j3c2025uojh8c5iqhfo89pqtmlgfdlvv2n@4ax.com...
Honest John wrote:
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:rko1029qvu61tgqg9jlqdi4car15j68mi8@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:48:53 GMT, in alt.astrology, Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Scientific evidence proves that pre-historic man had some sort of
belief in supernatural deities:
That's not going to take much convincing. Prehistoric, even
pre-industrial, people were commonly superstitious. They made
things up to explain all sorts of things they couldn't understand.
So how do explain the fact that every U.S. President without
exception
has acknowledged God?
Why would I NEED to explain it ? Belief in a god is a personal
matter of faith, not something that requires much explanation.
If you're one of those 'Intelligent Design' proponents, I
just want to say I really like your argument... "it's just too
damn complicated to understand life. we can't explain it so we
shouldn't even try." LOVE that argument!!
Let's try this for a brief moment. I'm a Christian who has no problem
sharing my views and explaining them.
What are you?
A Native American who can point to the hate speech which has come
from the mouth of men which speak for your god.
Did you know one of the worst massacre in american history of Native
Americans was led by an so called "Man of God". Actually much of the
hate of the Red Man comes from official position in many of the
churches that Native American's had no soul and couldn't be saved.
I didn't think that until I read the hate in your post!
Have a nice night, APPLE
Yeah. These leeches of society hardly deserve a reply.
Jd
Indeed, they are lazy and drunk leeches.
HJ
.
|
|
|
| User: "Art Deco" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
26 Feb 2006 12:00:44 AM |
|
|
Honest John <honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Anno Domini" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:j3c2025uojh8c5iqhfo89pqtmlgfdlvv2n@4ax.com...
Honest John wrote:
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:rko1029qvu61tgqg9jlqdi4car15j68mi8@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:48:53 GMT, in alt.astrology, Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Scientific evidence proves that pre-historic man had some sort of
belief in supernatural deities:
That's not going to take much convincing. Prehistoric, even
pre-industrial, people were commonly superstitious. They made
things up to explain all sorts of things they couldn't understand.
So how do explain the fact that every U.S. President without
exception
has acknowledged God?
Why would I NEED to explain it ? Belief in a god is a personal
matter of faith, not something that requires much explanation.
If you're one of those 'Intelligent Design' proponents, I
just want to say I really like your argument... "it's just too
damn complicated to understand life. we can't explain it so we
shouldn't even try." LOVE that argument!!
Let's try this for a brief moment. I'm a Christian who has no problem
sharing my views and explaining them.
What are you?
A Native American who can point to the hate speech which has come
from the mouth of men which speak for your god.
Did you know one of the worst massacre in american history of Native
Americans was led by an so called "Man of God". Actually much of the
hate of the Red Man comes from official position in many of the
churches that Native American's had no soul and couldn't be saved.
I didn't think that until I read the hate in your post!
Have a nice night, APPLE
Yeah. These leeches of society hardly deserve a reply.
Jd
Indeed, they are lazy and drunk leeches.
HJ
When do you start posting racist diatribes too, clock brain?
--
"Good come back *****!"
"Didn't you bet a merit badge in Gopher Choking, bugger Boy?"
"We don't discuss religion anymore you fucking idiot! Eat some more *****"
-- Honest John, Christian evangelist
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Officer" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
25 Feb 2006 10:14:37 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:48:10 -0600, in alt.astrology, "Honest John"
<honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:rko1029qvu61tgqg9jlqdi4car15j68mi8@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:48:53 GMT, in alt.astrology, Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Scientific evidence proves that pre-historic man had some sort of
belief in supernatural deities:
That's not going to take much convincing. Prehistoric, even
pre-industrial, people were commonly superstitious. They made
things up to explain all sorts of things they couldn't understand.
So how do explain the fact that every U.S. President without exception
has acknowledged God?
Why would I NEED to explain it ? Belief in a god is a personal
matter of faith, not something that requires much explanation.
If you're one of those 'Intelligent Design' proponents, I
just want to say I really like your argument... "it's just too
damn complicated to understand life. we can't explain it so we
shouldn't even try." LOVE that argument!!
Let's try this for a brief moment. I'm a Christian who has no problem
sharing my views and explaining them.
What are you?
A Native American who can point to the hate speech which has come
from the mouth of men which speak for your god.
Did you know one of the worst massacre in american history of Native
Americans was led by an so called "Man of God". Actually much of the
hate of the Red Man comes from official position in many of the
churches that Native American's had no soul and couldn't be saved.
I didn't think
You didn't think is 100% right.
that until I read the hate in your post!
Facts sort of hurt your beliefs, when you examine them...
Have a nice night, APPLE
Apple?
--
Ak'toh'di
.
|
|
|
| User: "Honest John" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
25 Feb 2006 10:28:16 PM |
|
|
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:9na202963gi7o33f6f2781a1sbrk5uvr5b@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:48:10 -0600, in alt.astrology, "Honest John"
<honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:rko1029qvu61tgqg9jlqdi4car15j68mi8@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:48:53 GMT, in alt.astrology, Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Scientific evidence proves that pre-historic man had some sort of
belief in supernatural deities:
That's not going to take much convincing. Prehistoric, even
pre-industrial, people were commonly superstitious. They made
things up to explain all sorts of things they couldn't understand.
So how do explain the fact that every U.S. President without
exception
has acknowledged God?
Why would I NEED to explain it ? Belief in a god is a personal
matter of faith, not something that requires much explanation.
If you're one of those 'Intelligent Design' proponents, I
just want to say I really like your argument... "it's just too
damn complicated to understand life. we can't explain it so we
shouldn't even try." LOVE that argument!!
Let's try this for a brief moment. I'm a Christian who has no problem
sharing my views and explaining them.
What are you?
A Native American who can point to the hate speech which has come
from the mouth of men which speak for your god.
Did you know one of the worst massacre in american history of Native
Americans was led by an so called "Man of God". Actually much of the
hate of the Red Man comes from official position in many of the
churches that Native American's had no soul and couldn't be saved.
I didn't think
You didn't think is 100% right.
that until I read the hate in your post!
Facts sort of hurt your beliefs, when you examine them...
Have a nice night, APPLE
Apple?
Like an Oreo to blacks, Black on the outside and white on the inside. An
apple is red on the outside and white on the inside,
HJ
.
|
|
|
| User: "Art Deco" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
26 Feb 2006 12:01:27 AM |
|
|
Honest John <honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:9na202963gi7o33f6f2781a1sbrk5uvr5b@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:48:10 -0600, in alt.astrology, "Honest John"
<honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:rko1029qvu61tgqg9jlqdi4car15j68mi8@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:48:53 GMT, in alt.astrology, Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Scientific evidence proves that pre-historic man had some sort of
belief in supernatural deities:
That's not going to take much convincing. Prehistoric, even
pre-industrial, people were commonly superstitious. They made
things up to explain all sorts of things they couldn't understand.
So how do explain the fact that every U.S. President without
exception
has acknowledged God?
Why would I NEED to explain it ? Belief in a god is a personal
matter of faith, not something that requires much explanation.
If you're one of those 'Intelligent Design' proponents, I
just want to say I really like your argument... "it's just too
damn complicated to understand life. we can't explain it so we
shouldn't even try." LOVE that argument!!
Let's try this for a brief moment. I'm a Christian who has no problem
sharing my views and explaining them.
What are you?
A Native American who can point to the hate speech which has come
from the mouth of men which speak for your god.
Did you know one of the worst massacre in american history of Native
Americans was led by an so called "Man of God". Actually much of the
hate of the Red Man comes from official position in many of the
churches that Native American's had no soul and couldn't be saved.
I didn't think
You didn't think is 100% right.
that until I read the hate in your post!
Facts sort of hurt your beliefs, when you examine them...
Have a nice night, APPLE
Apple?
Like an Oreo to blacks, Black on the outside and white on the inside. An
apple is red on the outside and white on the inside,
HJ
There it is.
--
"Good come back *****!"
"Didn't you bet a merit badge in Gopher Choking, bugger Boy?"
"We don't discuss religion anymore you fucking idiot! Eat some more *****"
-- Honest John, Christian evangelist
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Officer" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
26 Feb 2006 01:14:04 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 23:01:27 -0700, in alt.astrology, Art Deco
<art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote:
Honest John <honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:9na202963gi7o33f6f2781a1sbrk5uvr5b@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:48:10 -0600, in alt.astrology, "Honest John"
<honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:rko1029qvu61tgqg9jlqdi4car15j68mi8@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:48:53 GMT, in alt.astrology, Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Scientific evidence proves that pre-historic man had some sort of
belief in supernatural deities:
That's not going to take much convincing. Prehistoric, even
pre-industrial, people were commonly superstitious. They made
things up to explain all sorts of things they couldn't understand.
So how do explain the fact that every U.S. President without
exception
has acknowledged God?
Why would I NEED to explain it ? Belief in a god is a personal
matter of faith, not something that requires much explanation.
If you're one of those 'Intelligent Design' proponents, I
just want to say I really like your argument... "it's just too
damn complicated to understand life. we can't explain it so we
shouldn't even try." LOVE that argument!!
Let's try this for a brief moment. I'm a Christian who has no problem
sharing my views and explaining them.
What are you?
A Native American who can point to the hate speech which has come
from the mouth of men which speak for your god.
Did you know one of the worst massacre in american history of Native
Americans was led by an so called "Man of God". Actually much of the
hate of the Red Man comes from official position in many of the
churches that Native American's had no soul and couldn't be saved.
I didn't think
You didn't think is 100% right.
that until I read the hate in your post!
Facts sort of hurt your beliefs, when you examine them...
Have a nice night, APPLE
Apple?
Like an Oreo to blacks, Black on the outside and white on the inside. An
apple is red on the outside and white on the inside,
HJ
There it is.
I wonder What would their Jesus say to them...
--
Ak'toh'di
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
26 Feb 2006 09:43:45 AM |
|
|
Honest John wrote:
Like an Oreo to blacks, Black on the outside and white on the inside. An
apple is red on the outside and white on the inside,
And you're like David Irving to Jews, only the U.S.
government encourages you to lie.
(I believe Jeff invoked Godwin's law ages ago.)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gray Shockley" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
26 Feb 2006 02:45:13 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 09:43:45 -0600, wrote
(in article <1140968625.268332.51460@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>):
Honest John wrote:
Like an Oreo to blacks, Black on the outside and white on the inside. An
apple is red on the outside and white on the inside,
And you're like David Irving to Jews, only the U.S.
government encourages you to lie.
(I believe Jeff invoked Godwin's law ages ago.)
Shockley's Exception to Godwin's
Law: When someone is quoting
Hitler and his sycophants or
someone from neo-nazi orgs,
Godwin's Law is irrelevant.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
27 Feb 2006 06:41:39 PM |
|
|
Gray Shockley wrote:
Like an Oreo to blacks, Black on the outside and white on the inside. An
apple is red on the outside and white on the inside,
And you're like David Irving to Jews, only the U.S.
government encourages you to lie.
(I believe Jeff invoked Godwin's law ages ago.)
Shockley's Exception to Godwin's
Law: When someone is quoting
Hitler and his sycophants or
someone from neo-nazi orgs,
Godwin's Law is irrelevant.
Well, then, it'd be fine for me to say "If we lock up
David Irving, we have to lock up every the writers
of every American history textbook ever written, along
with the current crop of Reagan revisionists who argue
that the Contras DIDN'T kill thousands of Mayans, or
argue that there were no Norplant experiments on
reservations."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Officer" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
26 Feb 2006 01:05:51 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:28:16 -0600, in alt.astrology, "Honest John"
<honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:9na202963gi7o33f6f2781a1sbrk5uvr5b@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:48:10 -0600, in alt.astrology, "Honest John"
<honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:rko1029qvu61tgqg9jlqdi4car15j68mi8@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:48:53 GMT, in alt.astrology, Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Scientific evidence proves that pre-historic man had some sort of
belief in supernatural deities:
That's not going to take much convincing. Prehistoric, even
pre-industrial, people were commonly superstitious. They made
things up to explain all sorts of things they couldn't understand.
So how do explain the fact that every U.S. President without
exception
has acknowledged God?
Why would I NEED to explain it ? Belief in a god is a personal
matter of faith, not something that requires much explanation.
If you're one of those 'Intelligent Design' proponents, I
just want to say I really like your argument... "it's just too
damn complicated to understand life. we can't explain it so we
shouldn't even try." LOVE that argument!!
Let's try this for a brief moment. I'm a Christian who has no problem
sharing my views and explaining them.
What are you?
A Native American who can point to the hate speech which has come
from the mouth of men which speak for your god.
Did you know one of the worst massacre in american history of Native
Americans was led by an so called "Man of God". Actually much of the
hate of the Red Man comes from official position in many of the
churches that Native American's had no soul and couldn't be saved.
I didn't think
You didn't think is 100% right.
that until I read the hate in your post!
Facts sort of hurt your beliefs, when you examine them...
Have a nice night, APPLE
Apple?
Like an Oreo to blacks, Black on the outside and white on the inside. An
apple is red on the outside and white on the inside,
More like Rad as can be...
outside...
inside...
it is hard to be "Traditional".
But then I am far more traditional than you are a christian.
And JD/Anno is just like you, Dishonest John, a person that uses his
religion to justify his hate of others.
From: Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net>
Subject: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D.
Message-ID: <mua202pfj6pia14564npjraag6q5dk0rme@4ax.com>
"You are simpy just another whiner like the New Orleans niggers who
are seeking to make a life long career out of KATRINA."
--
Ak'toh'di
.
|
|
|
| User: "Art Deco" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
26 Feb 2006 09:57:16 AM |
|
|
Bob Officer <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote:
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:28:16 -0600, in alt.astrology, "Honest John"
<honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:9na202963gi7o33f6f2781a1sbrk5uvr5b@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:48:10 -0600, in alt.astrology, "Honest John"
<honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:rko1029qvu61tgqg9jlqdi4car15j68mi8@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:48:53 GMT, in alt.astrology, Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Scientific evidence proves that pre-historic man had some sort of
belief in supernatural deities:
That's not going to take much convincing. Prehistoric, even
pre-industrial, people were commonly superstitious. They made
things up to explain all sorts of things they couldn't understand.
So how do explain the fact that every U.S. President without
exception
has acknowledged God?
Why would I NEED to explain it ? Belief in a god is a personal
matter of faith, not something that requires much explanation.
If you're one of those 'Intelligent Design' proponents, I
just want to say I really like your argument... "it's just too
damn complicated to understand life. we can't explain it so we
shouldn't even try." LOVE that argument!!
Let's try this for a brief moment. I'm a Christian who has no problem
sharing my views and explaining them.
What are you?
A Native American who can point to the hate speech which has come
from the mouth of men which speak for your god.
Did you know one of the worst massacre in american history of Native
Americans was led by an so called "Man of God". Actually much of the
hate of the Red Man comes from official position in many of the
churches that Native American's had no soul and couldn't be saved.
I didn't think
You didn't think is 100% right.
that until I read the hate in your post!
Facts sort of hurt your beliefs, when you examine them...
Have a nice night, APPLE
Apple?
Like an Oreo to blacks, Black on the outside and white on the inside. An
apple is red on the outside and white on the inside,
More like Rad as can be...
outside...
inside...
it is hard to be "Traditional".
But then I am far more traditional than you are a christian.
And JD/Anno is just like you, Dishonest John, a person that uses his
religion to justify his hate of others.
From: Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net>
Subject: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D.
Message-ID: <mua202pfj6pia14564npjraag6q5dk0rme@4ax.com>
"You are simpy just another whiner like the New Orleans niggers who
are seeking to make a life long career out of KATRINA."
Note: no response from the false Christian hypocrites. No surprise
here, really.
--
"Good come back *****!"
"Didn't you bet a merit badge in Gopher Choking, bugger Boy?"
"We don't discuss religion anymore you fucking idiot! Eat some more *****"
-- Honest John, Christian evangelist
.
|
|
|
| User: "Honest John" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
26 Feb 2006 11:06:47 AM |
|
|
"Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:260220060857161736%art_deco@127.0.0.1...
Bob Officer <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote:
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:28:16 -0600, in alt.astrology, "Honest John"
<honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:9na202963gi7o33f6f2781a1sbrk5uvr5b@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:48:10 -0600, in alt.astrology, "Honest John"
<honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:rko1029qvu61tgqg9jlqdi4car15j68mi8@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:48:53 GMT, in alt.astrology, Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Scientific evidence proves that pre-historic man had some
sort of
belief in supernatural deities:
That's not going to take much convincing. Prehistoric, even
pre-industrial, people were commonly superstitious. They made
things up to explain all sorts of things they couldn't
understand.
So how do explain the fact that every U.S. President without
exception
has acknowledged God?
Why would I NEED to explain it ? Belief in a god is a personal
matter of faith, not something that requires much explanation.
If you're one of those 'Intelligent Design' proponents, I
just want to say I really like your argument... "it's just too
damn complicated to understand life. we can't explain it so we
shouldn't even try." LOVE that argument!!
Let's try this for a brief moment. I'm a Christian who has no
problem
sharing my views and explaining them.
What are you?
A Native American who can point to the hate speech which has come
from the mouth of men which speak for your god.
Did you know one of the worst massacre in american history of
Native
Americans was led by an so called "Man of God". Actually much of
the
hate of the Red Man comes from official position in many of the
churches that Native American's had no soul and couldn't be saved.
I didn't think
You didn't think is 100% right.
that until I read the hate in your post!
Facts sort of hurt your beliefs, when you examine them...
Have a nice night, APPLE
Apple?
Like an Oreo to blacks, Black on the outside and white on the inside.
An
apple is red on the outside and white on the inside,
More like Rad as can be...
outside...
inside...
it is hard to be "Traditional".
But then I am far more traditional than you are a christian.
And JD/Anno is just like you, Dishonest John, a person that uses his
religion to justify his hate of others.
From: Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net>
Subject: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D.
Message-ID: <mua202pfj6pia14564npjraag6q5dk0rme@4ax.com>
"You are simpy just another whiner like the New Orleans niggers who
are seeking to make a life long career out of KATRINA."
Note: no response from the false Christian hypocrites. No surprise
here, really.
I thought that you had given up those repostings, but I see you want to
continue this silly practice! But I'm going to take a "Higher" road and
show your minions of rat followers that I am the better person for not
reposting!
Notice ratz that I am not reposting to Art's cowardly taunts, let this be a
lesson to you, your leader is just an old frustrated old coot that has
soured on life and gets his kicks out of pulling the strings on you small
rats, out there.
Keep dancing at his direction, "Little Rats"!
HJ
.
|
|
|
| User: "Art Deco" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
26 Feb 2006 11:12:53 AM |
|
|
Honest John <honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:260220060857161736%art_deco@127.0.0.1...
Bob Officer <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote:
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:28:16 -0600, in alt.astrology, "Honest John"
<honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:9na202963gi7o33f6f2781a1sbrk5uvr5b@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:48:10 -0600, in alt.astrology, "Honest John"
<honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:rko1029qvu61tgqg9jlqdi4car15j68mi8@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:48:53 GMT, in alt.astrology, Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Scientific evidence proves that pre-historic man had some
sort of
belief in supernatural deities:
That's not going to take much convincing. Prehistoric, even
pre-industrial, people were commonly superstitious. They made
things up to explain all sorts of things they couldn't
understand.
So how do explain the fact that every U.S. President without
exception
has acknowledged God?
Why would I NEED to explain it ? Belief in a god is a personal
matter of faith, not something that requires much explanation.
If you're one of those 'Intelligent Design' proponents, I
just want to say I really like your argument... "it's just too
damn complicated to understand life. we can't explain it so we
shouldn't even try." LOVE that argument!!
Let's try this for a brief moment. I'm a Christian who has no
problem
sharing my views and explaining them.
What are you?
A Native American who can point to the hate speech which has come
from the mouth of men which speak for your god.
Did you know one of the worst massacre in american history of
Native
Americans was led by an so called "Man of God". Actually much of
the
hate of the Red Man comes from official position in many of the
churches that Native American's had no soul and couldn't be saved.
I didn't think
You didn't think is 100% right.
that until I read the hate in your post!
Facts sort of hurt your beliefs, when you examine them...
Have a nice night, APPLE
Apple?
Like an Oreo to blacks, Black on the outside and white on the inside.
An
apple is red on the outside and white on the inside,
More like Rad as can be...
outside...
inside...
it is hard to be "Traditional".
But then I am far more traditional than you are a christian.
And JD/Anno is just like you, Dishonest John, a person that uses his
religion to justify his hate of others.
From: Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net>
Subject: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D.
Message-ID: <mua202pfj6pia14564npjraag6q5dk0rme@4ax.com>
"You are simpy just another whiner like the New Orleans niggers who
are seeking to make a life long career out of KATRINA."
Note: no response from the false Christian hypocrites. No surprise
here, really.
Note: still no response from the false Christian hypocrite.
I thought that you had given up those repostings, but I see you want to
[screed flushed]
--
"Good come back *****!"
"Didn't you bet a merit badge in Gopher Choking, bugger Boy?"
"We don't discuss religion anymore you fucking idiot! Eat some more *****"
-- Honest John, Christian evangelist
.
|
|
|
| User: "Honest John" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
26 Feb 2006 11:40:07 AM |
|
|
"Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:260220061012533992%art_deco@127.0.0.1...
Honest John <honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:260220060857161736%art_deco@127.0.0.1...
Bob Officer <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote:
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:28:16 -0600, in alt.astrology, "Honest John"
<honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:9na202963gi7o33f6f2781a1sbrk5uvr5b@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:48:10 -0600, in alt.astrology, "Honest John"
<honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:rko1029qvu61tgqg9jlqdi4car15j68mi8@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:48:53 GMT, in alt.astrology, Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Scientific evidence proves that pre-historic man had some
sort of
belief in supernatural deities:
That's not going to take much convincing. Prehistoric, even
pre-industrial, people were commonly superstitious. They
made
things up to explain all sorts of things they couldn't
understand.
So how do explain the fact that every U.S. President without
exception
has acknowledged God?
Why would I NEED to explain it ? Belief in a god is a personal
matter of faith, not something that requires much explanation.
If you're one of those 'Intelligent Design' proponents, I
just want to say I really like your argument... "it's just too
damn complicated to understand life. we can't explain it so we
shouldn't even try." LOVE that argument!!
Let's try this for a brief moment. I'm a Christian who has no
problem
sharing my views and explaining them.
What are you?
A Native American who can point to the hate speech which has
come
from the mouth of men which speak for your god.
Did you know one of the worst massacre in american history of
Native
Americans was led by an so called "Man of God". Actually much of
the
hate of the Red Man comes from official position in many of the
churches that Native American's had no soul and couldn't be
saved.
I didn't think
You didn't think is 100% right.
that until I read the hate in your post!
Facts sort of hurt your beliefs, when you examine them...
Have a nice night, APPLE
Apple?
Like an Oreo to blacks, Black on the outside and white on the inside.
An
apple is red on the outside and white on the inside,
More like Rad as can be...
outside...
inside...
it is hard to be "Traditional".
But then I am far more traditional than you are a christian.
And JD/Anno is just like you, Dishonest John, a person that uses his
religion to justify his hate of others.
From: Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net>
Subject: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D.
Message-ID: <mua202pfj6pia14564npjraag6q5dk0rme@4ax.com>
"You are simpy just another whiner like the New Orleans niggers who
are seeking to make a life long career out of KATRINA."
Note: no response from the false Christian hypocrites. No surprise
here, really.
Note: still no response from the false Christian hypocrite.
No surprise you're still gay, Fart Deco!
I thought that you had given up those repostings, but I see you want to
continue this silly practice! But I'm going to take a "Higher" road and
show your minions of rat followers that I am the better person for not
reposting!
Notice ratz that I am not reposting to Art's cowardly taunts, let this be a
lesson to you, your leader is just an old frustrated old coot that has
soured on life and gets his kicks out of pulling the strings on you small
rats, out there.
Keep dancing at his direction, "Little Rats"!
HJ
.
|
|
|
| User: "Art Deco" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
26 Feb 2006 02:25:38 PM |
|
|
Honest John <honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
<nothing but his usual screed and lames>
--
"Good come back *****!"
"Didn't you bet a merit badge in Gopher Choking, bugger Boy?"
"We don't discuss religion anymore you fucking idiot! Eat some more *****"
-- Honest John, Christian evangelist
.
|
|
|
| User: "Honest John" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
26 Feb 2006 03:36:43 PM |
|
|
"Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:260220061325387878%art_deco@127.0.0.1...
Honest John <honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
<nothing but his usual screed and lames>
Just responding to your spamming, Fart
I thought that you had given up those repostings, but I see you want to
continue this silly practice! But I'm going to take a "Higher" road and
show your minions of rat followers that I am the better person for not
reposting!
Notice ratz that I am not reposting to Art's cowardly taunts, let this be a
lesson to you, your leader is just an old frustrated old coot that has
soured on life and gets his kicks out of pulling the strings on you small
rats, out there.
Keep dancing at his direction, "Little Rats"!
HJ
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Officer" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
26 Feb 2006 02:56:07 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 08:57:16 -0700, in alt.astrology, Art Deco
<art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote:
Bob Officer <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote:
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:28:16 -0600, in alt.astrology, "Honest John"
<honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:9na202963gi7o33f6f2781a1sbrk5uvr5b@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:48:10 -0600, in alt.astrology, "Honest John"
<honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:rko1029qvu61tgqg9jlqdi4car15j68mi8@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:48:53 GMT, in alt.astrology, Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Scientific evidence proves that pre-historic man had some sort of
belief in supernatural deities:
That's not going to take much convincing. Prehistoric, even
pre-industrial, people were commonly superstitious. They made
things up to explain all sorts of things they couldn't understand.
So how do explain the fact that every U.S. President without
exception
has acknowledged God?
Why would I NEED to explain it ? Belief in a god is a personal
matter of faith, not something that requires much explanation.
If you're one of those 'Intelligent Design' proponents, I
just want to say I really like your argument... "it's just too
damn complicated to understand life. we can't explain it so we
shouldn't even try." LOVE that argument!!
Let's try this for a brief moment. I'm a Christian who has no problem
sharing my views and explaining them.
What are you?
A Native American who can point to the hate speech which has come
from the mouth of men which speak for your god.
Did you know one of the worst massacre in american history of Native
Americans was led by an so called "Man of God". Actually much of the
hate of the Red Man comes from official position in many of the
churches that Native American's had no soul and couldn't be saved.
I didn't think
You didn't think is 100% right.
that until I read the hate in your post!
Facts sort of hurt your beliefs, when you examine them...
Have a nice night, APPLE
Apple?
Like an Oreo to blacks, Black on the outside and white on the inside. An
apple is red on the outside and white on the inside,
More like Rad as can be...
outside...
inside...
it is hard to be "Traditional".
But then I am far more traditional than you are a christian.
And JD/Anno is just like you, Dishonest John, a person that uses his
religion to justify his hate of others.
From: Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net>
Subject: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D.
Message-ID: <mua202pfj6pia14564npjraag6q5dk0rme@4ax.com>
"You are simpy just another whiner like the New Orleans niggers who
are seeking to make a life long career out of KATRINA."
Note: no response from the false Christian hypocrites. No surprise
here, really.
It isn't the 1st time a racist has hid behind a collar and robe.
--
Ak'toh'di
.
|
|
|
| User: "Honest John" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
26 Feb 2006 03:37:12 PM |
|
|
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:q75402hq7sdm9mne2lpr79ae0k7jnhmild@4ax.com...
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 08:57:16 -0700, in alt.astrology, Art Deco
<art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote:
Bob Officer <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote:
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:28:16 -0600, in alt.astrology, "Honest John"
<honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:9na202963gi7o33f6f2781a1sbrk5uvr5b@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:48:10 -0600, in alt.astrology, "Honest John"
<honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:rko1029qvu61tgqg9jlqdi4car15j68mi8@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:48:53 GMT, in alt.astrology, Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Scientific evidence proves that pre-historic man had some
sort of
belief in supernatural deities:
That's not going to take much convincing. Prehistoric, even
pre-industrial, people were commonly superstitious. They made
things up to explain all sorts of things they couldn't
understand.
So how do explain the fact that every U.S. President without
exception
has acknowledged God?
Why would I NEED to explain it ? Belief in a god is a personal
matter of faith, not something that requires much explanation.
If you're one of those 'Intelligent Design' proponents, I
just want to say I really like your argument... "it's just too
damn complicated to understand life. we can't explain it so we
shouldn't even try." LOVE that argument!!
Let's try this for a brief moment. I'm a Christian who has no
problem
sharing my views and explaining them.
What are you?
A Native American who can point to the hate speech which has come
from the mouth of men which speak for your god.
Did you know one of the worst massacre in american history of
Native
Americans was led by an so called "Man of God". Actually much of
the
hate of the Red Man comes from official position in many of the
churches that Native American's had no soul and couldn't be saved.
I didn't think
You didn't think is 100% right.
that until I read the hate in your post!
Facts sort of hurt your beliefs, when you examine them...
Have a nice night, APPLE
Apple?
Like an Oreo to blacks, Black on the outside and white on the inside.
An
apple is red on the outside and white on the inside,
More like Rad as can be...
outside...
inside...
it is hard to be "Traditional".
But then I am far more traditional than you are a christian.
And JD/Anno is just like you, Dishonest John, a person that uses his
religion to justify his hate of others.
From: Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net>
Subject: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D.
Message-ID: <mua202pfj6pia14564npjraag6q5dk0rme@4ax.com>
"You are simpy just another whiner like the New Orleans niggers who
are seeking to make a life long career out of KATRINA."
Note: no response from the false Christian hypocrites. No surprise
here, really.
It isn't the 1st time a racist has hid behind a collar and robe.
Who cares?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Officer" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
26 Feb 2006 04:11:00 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 15:37:12 -0600, in alt.astrology, "Honest John"
<honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:q75402hq7sdm9mne2lpr79ae0k7jnhmild@4ax.com...
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 08:57:16 -0700, in alt.astrology, Art Deco
<art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote:
Bob Officer <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote:
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:28:16 -0600, in alt.astrology, "Honest John"
<honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:9na202963gi7o33f6f2781a1sbrk5uvr5b@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:48:10 -0600, in alt.astrology, "Honest John"
<honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:rko1029qvu61tgqg9jlqdi4car15j68mi8@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:48:53 GMT, in alt.astrology, Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Scientific evidence proves that pre-historic man had some
sort of
belief in supernatural deities:
That's not going to take much convincing. Prehistoric, even
pre-industrial, people were commonly superstitious. They made
things up to explain all sorts of things they couldn't
understand.
So how do explain the fact that every U.S. President without
exception
has acknowledged God?
Why would I NEED to explain it ? Belief in a god is a personal
matter of faith, not something that requires much explanation.
If you're one of those 'Intelligent Design' proponents, I
just want to say I really like your argument... "it's just too
damn complicated to understand life. we can't explain it so we
shouldn't even try." LOVE that argument!!
Let's try this for a brief moment. I'm a Christian who has no
problem
sharing my views and explaining them.
What are you?
A Native American who can point to the hate speech which has come
from the mouth of men which speak for your god.
Did you know one of the worst massacre in american history of
Native
Americans was led by an so called "Man of God". Actually much of
the
hate of the Red Man comes from official position in many of the
churches that Native American's had no soul and couldn't be saved.
I didn't think
You didn't think is 100% right.
that until I read the hate in your post!
Facts sort of hurt your beliefs, when you examine them...
Have a nice night, APPLE
Apple?
Like an Oreo to blacks, Black on the outside and white on the inside.
An
apple is red on the outside and white on the inside,
More like Rad as can be...
outside...
inside...
it is hard to be "Traditional".
But then I am far more traditional than you are a christian.
And JD/Anno is just like you, Dishonest John, a person that uses his
religion to justify his hate of others.
From: Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net>
Subject: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D.
Message-ID: <mua202pfj6pia14564npjraag6q5dk0rme@4ax.com>
"You are simpy just another whiner like the New Orleans niggers who
are seeking to make a life long career out of KATRINA."
Note: no response from the false Christian hypocrites. No surprise
here, really.
It isn't the 1st time a racist has hid behind a collar and robe.
Who cares?
It seems like there happens to be at least two people that care.
Racism is condemned out of one side of the mouth with Hate of People
because of a difference of race, spews out of the other side.
KKK claimed to be a christian organization, but hated and killed
people not for not being christian, but because of race difference.
Rev John Chivington preach from the Pulpit of a Church, while
professing to believe in Christ, planned and plotted Genocide, Rape
and Mutilation of people because they were a different race.
Such is the difference between those that think they follow christ,
but are nothing more than Saulists. Carrying out acts of hate, rather
than the love their jesus commands.
Many people care. only those that worship the dark don't care.
--
Ak'toh'di
.
|
|
|
| User: "Honest John" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
26 Feb 2006 04:30:56 PM |
|
|
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:ng9402d6qierqrh08uu35gs511e8at76b0@4ax.com...
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 15:37:12 -0600, in alt.astrology, "Honest John"
<honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:q75402hq7sdm9mne2lpr79ae0k7jnhmild@4ax.com...
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 08:57:16 -0700, in alt.astrology, Art Deco
<art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote:
Bob Officer <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote:
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:28:16 -0600, in alt.astrology, "Honest John"
<honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:9na202963gi7o33f6f2781a1sbrk5uvr5b@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:48:10 -0600, in alt.astrology, "Honest
John"
<honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote:
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:rko1029qvu61tgqg9jlqdi4car15j68mi8@4ax.com...
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:48:53 GMT, in alt.astrology, Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Scientific evidence proves that pre-historic man had some
sort of
belief in supernatural deities:
That's not going to take much convincing. Prehistoric, even
pre-industrial, people were commonly superstitious. They
made
things up to explain all sorts of things they couldn't
understand.
So how do explain the fact that every U.S. President
without
exception
has acknowledged God?
Why would I NEED to explain it ? Belief in a god is a
personal
matter of faith, not something that requires much
explanation.
If you're one of those 'Intelligent Design' proponents, I
just want to say I really like your argument... "it's just
too
damn complicated to understand life. we can't explain it so
we
shouldn't even try." LOVE that argument!!
Let's try this for a brief moment. I'm a Christian who has no
problem
sharing my views and explaining them.
What are you?
A Native American who can point to the hate speech which has
come
from the mouth of men which speak for your god.
Did you know one of the worst massacre in american history of
Native
Americans was led by an so called "Man of God". Actually much
of
the
hate of the Red Man comes from official position in many of the
churches that Native American's had no soul and couldn't be
saved.
I didn't think
You didn't think is 100% right.
that until I read the hate in your post!
Facts sort of hurt your beliefs, when you examine them...
Have a nice night, APPLE
Apple?
Like an Oreo to blacks, Black on the outside and white on the
inside.
An
apple is red on the outside and white on the inside,
More like Rad as can be...
outside...
inside...
it is hard to be "Traditional".
But then I am far more traditional than you are a christian.
And JD/Anno is just like you, Dishonest John, a person that uses his
religion to justify his hate of others.
From: Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net>
Subject: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D.
Message-ID: <mua202pfj6pia14564npjraag6q5dk0rme@4ax.com>
"You are simpy just another whiner like the New Orleans niggers who
are seeking to make a life long career out of KATRINA."
Note: no response from the false Christian hypocrites. No surprise
here, really.
It isn't the 1st time a racist has hid behind a collar and robe.
Who cares?
It seems like there happens to be at least two people that care.
Racism is condemned out of one side of the mouth with Hate of People
because of a difference of race, spews out of the other side.
KKK claimed to be a christian organization, but hated and killed
people not for not being christian, but because of race difference.
Rev John Chivington preach from the Pulpit of a Church, while
professing to believe in Christ, planned and plotted Genocide, Rape
and Mutilation of people because they were a different race.
Such is the difference between those that think they follow christ,
but are nothing more than Saulists. Carrying out acts of hate, rather
than the love their jesus commands.
You really need to get over that ancient history and get on with live before
you don't have any life left and wondered what the heck you did with your
life!
Don't worry, be happy!
HJ
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Anno Domini" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
25 Feb 2006 08:45:35 PM |
|
|
Bob Officer wrote:
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:48:53 GMT, in alt.astrology, Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Scientific evidence proves that pre-historic man had some sort of
belief in supernatural deities:
That's not going to take much convincing. Prehistoric, even
pre-industrial, people were commonly superstitious. They made
things up to explain all sorts of things they couldn't understand.
So how do explain the fact that every U.S. President without exception
has acknowledged God?
Why would I NEED to explain it ? Belief in a god is a personal
matter of faith, not something that requires much explanation.
If you're one of those 'Intelligent Design' proponents, I
just want to say I really like your argument... "it's just too
damn complicated to understand life. we can't explain it so we
shouldn't even try." LOVE that argument!!
Let's try this for a brief moment. I'm a Christian who has no problem
sharing my views and explaining them.
What are you?
A Native American who can point to the hate speech which has come
from the mouth of men which speak for your god.
Did you know one of the worst massacre in american history of Native
Americans was led by an so called "Man of God". Actually much of the
hate of the Red Man comes from official position in many of the
churches that Native American's had no soul and couldn't be saved.
Liar. You are simply being deceptive.
Here's the record which speaks for all Native Americans in the south..
"Urged by these considerations, the Cherokees, long divided
in opinion, became unanimous, and like their brethren, the Creeks,
Seminoles, Choctaws, and Chickasaws, determined, by the undivided
voice of a General Convention of all the people, held at Tahlequah, on
the 21st day of August, in the present year, to make common cause with
the South and share its fortunes.
In now carrying this resolution into effect and
consummating a treaty of alliance and friendship with the Confederate
States of America the Cherokee people declares that it has been
faithful and loyal to is engagements with the United States until, by
placing its safety and even its national existence in imminent peril,
those States have released them from those engagements.
Menaced by a great danger, they exercise the inalienable
right of self-defense, and declare themselves a free people,
independent of the Northern States of America, and at war with them by
their own act. Obeying the dictates of prudence and providing for the
general safety and welfare, confident of the rectitude of their
intentions and true to the obligations of duty and honor, they accept
the issue thus forced upon them, unite their fortunes now and forever
with those of the Confederate States, and take up arms for the common
cause, and with entire confidence in the justice of that cause and
with a firm reliance upon Divine Providence, will resolutely abide the
consequences." - Tahlequah, Cherokee Nation, October 28, 1861.
You are simpy just another whiner like the New Orleans niggers who are
seeking to make a life long career out of KATRINA.
Don't reply to me any more you scum bag.
Jd, prophet of God A.D. 2006
.
|
|
|
| User: "Honest John" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
25 Feb 2006 08:53:05 PM |
|
|
"Anno Domini" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:mua202pfj6pia14564npjraag6q5dk0rme@4ax.com...
Bob Officer wrote:
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:48:53 GMT, in alt.astrology, Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Scientific evidence proves that pre-historic man had some sort of
belief in supernatural deities:
That's not going to take much convincing. Prehistoric, even
pre-industrial, people were commonly superstitious. They made
things up to explain all sorts of things they couldn't understand.
So how do explain the fact that every U.S. President without
exception
has acknowledged God?
Why would I NEED to explain it ? Belief in a god is a personal
matter of faith, not something that requires much explanation.
If you're one of those 'Intelligent Design' proponents, I
just want to say I really like your argument... "it's just too
damn complicated to understand life. we can't explain it so we
shouldn't even try." LOVE that argument!!
Let's try this for a brief moment. I'm a Christian who has no problem
sharing my views and explaining them.
What are you?
A Native American who can point to the hate speech which has come
from the mouth of men which speak for your god.
Did you know one of the worst massacre in american history of Native
Americans was led by an so called "Man of God". Actually much of the
hate of the Red Man comes from official position in many of the
churches that Native American's had no soul and couldn't be saved.
Liar. You are simply being deceptive.
Here's the record which speaks for all Native Americans in the south..
"Urged by these considerations, the Cherokees, long divided
in opinion, became unanimous, and like their brethren, the Creeks,
Seminoles, Choctaws, and Chickasaws, determined, by the undivided
voice of a General Convention of all the people, held at Tahlequah, on
the 21st day of August, in the present year, to make common cause with
the South and share its fortunes.
In now carrying this resolution into effect and
consummating a treaty of alliance and friendship with the Confederate
States of America the Cherokee people declares that it has been
faithful and loyal to is engagements with the United States until, by
placing its safety and even its national existence in imminent peril,
those States have released them from those engagements.
Menaced by a great danger, they exercise the inalienable
right of self-defense, and declare themselves a free people,
independent of the Northern States of America, and at war with them by
their own act. Obeying the dictates of prudence and providing for the
general safety and welfare, confident of the rectitude of their
intentions and true to the obligations of duty and honor, they accept
the issue thus forced upon them, unite their fortunes now and forever
with those of the Confederate States, and take up arms for the common
cause, and with entire confidence in the justice of that cause and
with a firm reliance upon Divine Providence, will resolutely abide the
consequences." - Tahlequah, Cherokee Nation, October 28, 1861.
You are simpy just another whiner like the New Orleans niggers who are
seeking to make a life long career out of KATRINA.
Don't reply to me any more you scum bag.
Jd, prophet of God A.D. 2006
Very true.
HJ
.
|
|
| | |
