Scientific evidence proves that pre-historic man had some sort of
belief in supernatural deities:
"A growing number of anthropologists and archeo-mythologists argue
that the prevailing ideology of belief in prehistoric Europe and much
of the world was based on the worship of a single earth goddess, who
was assumed to be the fount of all life and who radiated harmony among
all living things." - Al Gore (Earth in the Balance; Ecology and the
Human Spirit)
"Much of the evidence for the existence of this primitive religion
comes from the many thousands of artifacts uncovered in ceremonial
sites. These sites are so widespread that they seem to confirm the
notion that a goddess religion was ubiquitous throughout much of the
world until the antecedents of today's religions - most of which still
have a distinctly masculine orientation - swept out of India and the
Near East, almost obliterating belief in the goddess. The last vestige
of organized goddess worship was eliminated by Christianity" - Al Gore
(Earth in the Balance; Ecology and the Human Spirit)
Yet around 600 B.C. (before the birth of Jesus) and in the name of
"science" men began to employ themselves idiotically in the futile
attempt to remove the notion of the existance of supernatural beings
from the fabric of their current culture...
"The early Greek, or Hellenic, culture marked a different approach to
science. The Ionian natural philosophers removed the gods from the
personal roles they had played in the cosmologies of Babylonia and
Egypt and sought to order the world according to philosophical
principles. Thales of Miletus (6th cent. B.C.) was one of the earliest
of these and contributed to astronomy, geometry, and cosmology. He was
followed by Anaximander, who extended Thales' ideas and proposed that
the universe is composed of four basic elements, i.e., earth, air,
fire, and water; this theory was also taught by Empedocles (5th cent.
B.C.) in Sicily."
http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?method=4&dsid=2222&dekey=Science&gwp=8&curtab=2222_1&linktext=science
Enter Charles Darwin whom many of you think fathered the theory of
evolution. In fact, Darwin pilfered his notions from other scientists,
some who had come before him (such as his grandfather for one):
"Charles Darwin's grandfather, Erasmus Darwin, was one of the leading
intellectuals of eighteenth century England, a man with a remarkable
array of interests and pursuits. Erasmus Darwin was a respected
physician, a well known poet, philosopher, botanist, and naturalist.
As a naturalist, he formulated one of the first formal theories on
evolution in Zoonomia, or, The Laws of Organic Life (1794-1796). He
also presented his evolutionary ideas in verse, in particular in the
posthumously published poem The Temple of Nature."
http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/history/Edarwin.html
For your reading convenience, I dug up that poem. Here it is:
"Organic life beneath the shoreless waves
Was born and nurs'd in ocean's pearly caves;
First forms minute, unseen by spheric glass,
Move on the mud, or pierce the watery mass;
These, as successive generations bloom,
New powers acquire and larger limbs assume;
Whence countless groups of vegetation spring,
And breathing realms of fin and feet and wing."
- Erasmus Darwin. (The Temple of Nature, 1802)
And here, Darwins grandfather clearly (and falsely, in true false
scientific fashion) suggests that all living things "evolved" from a
common ancestor. And I admit being startled myself upon discovering
this tidbit of history since I'd previously blamed Darwin (Charles)
for single handedly corrupting science and everything good about
Biology (which is my secular profession). Professors will not tell you
this stuff. Anyhow here it is. This quote from Charles Darwins
grandfather proves that Darwin himself does not deserve all the
credit (blame) for coming up with the theory (lie) of human evolution
a.k.a... the lie concerning the "common ancestor" theory:
"Would it be too bold to imagine that, in the great length of time
since the earth began to exist, perhaps millions of ages before the
commencement of the history of mankind would it be too bold to imagine
that all warm-blooded animals have arisen from one living filament,
which the great First Cause endued with animality, with the power of
acquiring new parts, attended with new propensities, directed by
irritations, sensations, volitions and associations, and thus
possessing the faculty of continuing to improve by its own inherent
activity, and of delivering down these improvements by generation to
its posterity, world without end!" Erasmus Darwin (Zoönomia, 1794)
http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Erasmus+Darwin
Did you see what he said? Independent organisms which need no God
atall.
So from grandpaw to grandson was the torch to passed in order to
attempt to remove supernatural concepts and possibilities from the
minds of men... all under the disguise of "science":
The lie began to spread (as a tool of the devil) under the name of
"science":
"Ernst Haeckel, much like Herbert Spencer, was always quotable, even
when wrong. Although best known for the famous statement "ontogeny
recapitulates phylogeny", he also coined many words commonly used by
biologists today, such as phylum, phylogeny, and ecology."
"Although trained as a physician, Haeckel abandoned his practice in
1859 after reading Darwin's Origin of Species. Always suspicious of
teleological and mystical explanation, Haeckel used the Origin as
ammunition both to attack entrenched religious dogma and to build his
own unique world view."
http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/history/haeckel.html
On my exact birthday 95 years ago Charles Darwins "Origin of the
Species" was actually published as "On the Origin of Species by Means
of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the
Struggle for Life". So here am I, 95 years later finding myself trying
to correct al these lies as if it were my divine duty.
"First published on 24 November 1859, The Origin of Species (full
title On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the
Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life) by British
naturalist Charles Darwin is one of the pivotal works in scientific
history, and arguably the pre-eminent work in biology. In it, Darwin
makes "one long argument" for his theory that "groups" of organisms,
(which we now call populations) rather than individual organisms,
gradually evolve through the process of natural selection—a mechanism
effectively introduced to the public at large by the book. The work
presents detailed scientific evidence he had accumulated both on the
Voyage of the Beagle in the 1830s and since his return, painstakingly
laying out his theory and refuting the doctrine of "Created kinds"
underlying the theories of Creation biology which were then widely
accepted."
http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/The+Origin+of+Species
Of course. Darwin fell to (pseudo) "science" and became an
X-christian. Formerly, he was a Bible quoting Christian....
"During these two years I was led to think much about religion. Whilst
on board the Beagle I was quite orthodox, and I remember being
heartily laughed at by several of the officers (though themselves
orthodox) for quoting the Bible as an unanswerable authority on some
point of morality." - Charles Darwin (The Autobiography of Charles
Darwin)
However, the devil has finally conceded that man will never easily
relinquish his belief in the supernatural and will never surrender his
God given rights of "faith".
And thus "science", in this modern day and time reverts to mans
earlier primordial superstitions of goddess worship in a last ditch
effort to deceive him:
"In science, a Gaia theory is a class of scientific models of the
biosphere in which life fosters and maintains suitable conditions for
itself by affecting Earth's environment. The first such theory was
created by the English atmospheric scientist James Lovelock in 1969.
He hypothesized that the living matter of the planet functioned like a
single organism and named this self-regulating living system after the
Greek goddess Gaia."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaia_theory_%28science%29
Lovelock was no insignificant scientists seeing that he was employed
at NASA's Jet Propulslsion Lab:
"A lifelong inventor, some of his inventions were adopted by NASA in
their program of planetary exploration. It was while working for NASA
that Lovelock developed the Gaia Hypothesis."
"James Lovelock is the author of approximately 200 scientific papers,
distributed almost equally among topics in Medicine, Biology,
Instrument Science and Geophysiology. He has filed more than 50
patents, mostly for detectors for use in chemical analysis. One of
these, the electron capture detector, was important in the development
of environmental awareness."
"For me, the personal revelation of Gaia came quite suddenly - like a
flash of enlightenment. I was in a small room on the top floor of a
building at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California. It
was the autumn of 1965 ... and I was talking with a colleague, Dian
Hitchcock, about a paper we were preparing ... It was at that moment
that I glimpsed Gaia."
http://www.gaianet.fsbusiness.co.uk/gaiatheory.html
However, this is no great surprise seeing that the Bible perfectly
explains that "evolution" is not the problem, but that "devolution" is
the culprit of the latter days of civilization as we know it. The
"devolution" of mankind is simply summarized as being a state of being
of men by which they have somehow (by democic influence) lost "faith".
"Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some
shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and
doctrines of devils" (1 Timothy 4:1)
comments welcome, as always
Jd A.D. 2006
Anno Domini" is Latin for "in the year of Our Lord", referring to Our
Lord Jesus Christ. That is, "AD 1996" literally means "in the 1996'th
year since the birth of the Christ." Now not all the world is
Christian, so it makes no sense for a Jew, a Moslem, a Hindu, a Witch,
a Druid, or an atheist to refer to the date as being in the year of
"their Lord" when they don't follow him. So "CE" is a more considerate
way of labeling dates in the Gregorian calendar without rubbing
non-Christian's noses in the fact that so much of the world is using a
calendar based on the alleged birth-year of the man we Christians
believe to be the Messiah.
http://www.radix.net/~dglenn/defs/ce.html
.
|
|
| User: "Bob Officer" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
03 Mar 2006 01:25:12 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 17:59:11 -0700, in alt.astrology, Art Deco
<art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote:
Bob Officer <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote:
On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 03:23:49 GMT, in alt.astrology, Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Bob Officer wrote:
Nice to such hate from the men, called to preach by your god. nothing
but hate...
If I didn't know better, I would think your church that of your own
mythical satan... the evil one.
You are obviously stuck in the past and in the hatred of Christianity
since you overlooked the fact that I was talking about Injuns of the
south and you are talking about Colorado pagan injuns.
You mean there is some sort of difference? I being a Native American
know I share not only a root set of culture, I also share a Some
parts of my language with many different tribes...
Note that the fine, upstanding Christian "prophet" employs yet another
racial epithet.
I noticed that...
I am glad other people do too.
--
Ak'toh'di
.
|
|
|
| User: "Honest John" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
03 Mar 2006 11:39:08 AM |
|
|
"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:1qrf0213j1lofsbdruhfot6p0cuj83isqc@4ax.com...
On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 17:59:11 -0700, in alt.astrology, Art Deco
<art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote:
Bob Officer <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote:
On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 03:23:49 GMT, in alt.astrology, Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Bob Officer wrote:
Nice to such hate from the men, called to preach by your god. nothing
but hate...
If I didn't know better, I would think your church that of your own
mythical satan... the evil one.
You are obviously stuck in the past and in the hatred of Christianity
since you overlooked the fact that I was talking about Injuns of the
south and you are talking about Colorado pagan injuns.
You mean there is some sort of difference? I being a Native American
know I share not only a root set of culture, I also share a Some
parts of my language with many different tribes...
Note that the fine, upstanding Christian "prophet" employs yet another
racial epithet.
I noticed that...
I am glad other people do too.
Sold to the porch monkey in the green fur pants and bone in his nose for 25
cents. Be proud brother!
- Art Deco a.k.a. "Big Bux Billie D"
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
04 Mar 2006 05:41:55 AM |
|
|
Bob Officer wrote:
I wouldn't even doubt if you yourself had a TOTEM pole in your
backyard, you idolitrous, unrepentant pagan.
That would be an part of the culture of far northwestern Native
Americans...
Jeff Day, a.k.a. Honest John, has a
preoccupation with phallic poles.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
27 Feb 2006 10:52:49 AM |
|
|
In article <5nkvv1deg1387g9500tgflcqks31524k8k@4ax.com> Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> writes:
Perseid wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> Spat the Words
Scientific evidence proves that pre-historic man had some sort of
belief in supernatural deities:
That's not going to take much convincing. Prehistoric, even
pre-industrial, people were commonly superstitious. They made
things up to explain all sorts of things they couldn't understand.
So how do explain the fact that every U.S. President without exception
has acknowledged God?
Because they were politicians.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anno Domini" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
01 Mar 2006 09:23:50 PM |
|
|
Cary Kittrell wrote:
In article <5nkvv1deg1387g9500tgflcqks31524k8k@4ax.com> Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> writes:
So how do explain the fact that every U.S. President without exception
has acknowledged God?
Because they were politicians.
-- cary
And thus, not scientists.
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
02 Mar 2006 11:14:31 AM |
|
|
In article <7uuc02pdr4vgbn4otrj73hq1gcsvqs18cg@4ax.com> Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> writes:
Cary Kittrell wrote:
In article <5nkvv1deg1387g9500tgflcqks31524k8k@4ax.com> Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> writes:
So how do explain the fact that every U.S. President without exception
has acknowledged God?
Because they were politicians.
-- cary
And thus, not scientists.
That's right.
And it shows.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob LeChevalier" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
25 Feb 2006 11:34:49 PM |
|
|
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Scientific evidence proves that pre-historic man had some sort of
belief in supernatural deities:
"A growing number of anthropologists and archeo-mythologists argue
that the prevailing ideology of belief in prehistoric Europe and much
of the world was based on the worship of a single earth goddess, who
was assumed to be the fount of all life and who radiated harmony among
all living things." - Al Gore (Earth in the Balance; Ecology and the
Human Spirit)
Actually, it seems patently obvious that a "nature goddess" is by
definition NOT "supernatural", but in fact quite "natural".
And here, Darwins grandfather clearly (and falsely, in true false
scientific fashion) suggests that all living things "evolved" from a
common ancestor. And I admit being startled myself upon discovering
this tidbit of history since I'd previously blamed Darwin (Charles)
for single handedly corrupting science and everything good about
Biology (which is my secular profession). Professors will not tell you
this stuff. Anyhow here it is. This quote from Charles Darwins
grandfather proves that Darwin himself does not deserve all the
credit (blame) for coming up with the theory (lie) of human evolution
Of course. Darwin's contribution was not the concept of evolution,
but the process and the ubiquity of that process, and the
observational evidence supporting that process.
lojbab
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anno Domini" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
01 Mar 2006 09:23:51 PM |
|
|
Bob LeChevalier wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Scientific evidence proves that pre-historic man had some sort of
belief in supernatural deities:
"A growing number of anthropologists and archeo-mythologists argue
that the prevailing ideology of belief in prehistoric Europe and much
of the world was based on the worship of a single earth goddess, who
was assumed to be the fount of all life and who radiated harmony among
all living things." - Al Gore (Earth in the Balance; Ecology and the
Human Spirit)
Actually, it seems patently obvious that a "nature goddess" is by
definition NOT "supernatural", but in fact quite "natural".
"Seems"? If you're not sure or have no compelling evidence from the
Holy Bible then your opinion ranks down there with Skinner, his
pidgeon boxes; Freud the fraud, and Charles Darwin who turned his back
on his Creator.
On your death bed, will ye die in fear or will you have a smile on
your face as you await your meeting with Jesus?
Jd
"Often a cold shudder has run through me, and I have asked myself
whether I may have not devoted myself to a phantasy" (Charles Darwin,
Life and Letters)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Honest John" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
01 Mar 2006 09:27:37 PM |
|
|
"Anno Domini" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:u4vc02prg12eh11m2aiq99rk361vc1i6bp@4ax.com...
Bob LeChevalier wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Scientific evidence proves that pre-historic man had some sort of
belief in supernatural deities:
"A growing number of anthropologists and archeo-mythologists argue
that the prevailing ideology of belief in prehistoric Europe and much
of the world was based on the worship of a single earth goddess, who
was assumed to be the fount of all life and who radiated harmony among
all living things." - Al Gore (Earth in the Balance; Ecology and the
Human Spirit)
Actually, it seems patently obvious that a "nature goddess" is by
definition NOT "supernatural", but in fact quite "natural".
"Seems"? If you're not sure or have no compelling evidence from the
Holy Bible then your opinion ranks down there with Skinner, his
pidgeon boxes; Freud the fraud, and Charles Darwin who turned his back
on his Creator.
On your death bed, will ye die in fear or will you have a smile on
your face as you await your meeting with Jesus?
Jd
That's right, tell it!
HJ
"Often a cold shudder has run through me, and I have asked myself
whether I may have not devoted myself to a phantasy" (Charles Darwin,
Life and Letters)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anno Domini" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
01 Mar 2006 10:23:57 PM |
|
|
Honest John wrote:
"Anno Domini" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:u4vc02prg12eh11m2aiq99rk361vc1i6bp@4ax.com...
Bob LeChevalier wrote:
Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote:
Scientific evidence proves that pre-historic man had some sort of
belief in supernatural deities:
"A growing number of anthropologists and archeo-mythologists argue
that the prevailing ideology of belief in prehistoric Europe and much
of the world was based on the worship of a single earth goddess, who
was assumed to be the fount of all life and who radiated harmony among
all living things." - Al Gore (Earth in the Balance; Ecology and the
Human Spirit)
Actually, it seems patently obvious that a "nature goddess" is by
definition NOT "supernatural", but in fact quite "natural".
"Seems"? If you're not sure or have no compelling evidence from the
Holy Bible then your opinion ranks down there with Skinner, his
pidgeon boxes; Freud the fraud, and Charles Darwin who turned his back
on his Creator.
On your death bed, will ye die in fear or will you have a smile on
your face as you await your meeting with Jesus?
Jd
That's right, tell it!
HJ
I do. But they hate it. However, you and I simply cannot secumb to
lukewarmedness. Fence sitting is not in our nature being born of the
Spirit.
Now. Even though THEY have LAWS in their Constitution that guarantees
free speech.... one can easily see how THEY, being only 1 or 2% of the
population do not want the othe 98% of the population to say anything
about the God of Israel.
So. It is equally problematic in my mind as to why a Christian nation
such as this is supposed to be.... has fallen into the abomination of
lukewarmedness as it has.
My only hope is that the TRUTH of the God of Israel will awaken those
who need awakening when they need to be awakened, in order that our
nation does not go down the toilet.
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Powell" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
03 Mar 2006 05:22:03 PM |
|
|
"Anno Domini" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:gc3d02d7kvt9nmgjk0egmp5vrujdmvbui2@4ax.com...
<snip>
Now. Even though THEY have LAWS in their Constitution that guarantees
free speech.... one can easily see how THEY, being only 1 or 2% of the
population do not want the othe 98% of the population to say anything
about the God of Israel.
No, we are just tired of hearing it. Give it a rest, others want to speak.
And they are much more intelligent than you.
Besides, you are not even talking about the God of Israel. You keep mewling
on about some figment that you have made up with no basis in religious
thought.
James Powell
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anno Domini" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
05 Mar 2006 07:24:08 PM |
|
|
James Powell wrote:
<snip>
Now. Even though THEY have LAWS in their Constitution that guarantees
free speech.... one can easily see how THEY, being only 1 or 2% of the
population do not want the othe 98% of the population to say anything
about the God of Israel.
No, we are just tired of hearing it. Give it a rest, others want to speak.
And they are much more intelligent than you.
Besides, you are not even talking about the God of Israel. You keep mewling
on about some figment that you have made up with no basis in religious
thought.
James Powell
Well, you keep talking about nothing. Apparently you are such a
coward that you have no counter argument to counter my aruments.
I only keep replying in hopes that I might someday save you from that
monkey cult which has taken control of your mind.
Ramapithecus was widely recognized as a direct ancestor of humans. It
is now established that he was merely an extinct type of orangutan.
Piltdown man was hyped as the missing link in publications for over 40
years. He was a fraud based on a human skull cap and an orangutan's
jaw.
Nebraska man was a fraud based on a single tooth of a rare type of
pig.
Java man was based on sketchy evidence of a femur, skull cap and three
teeth found within a wide area over a one year period. It turns out
the bones were found in an area of human remains, and now the femur is
considered human and the skull cap from a large ape.
Neandertal man was traditionally depicted as a stooped ape-man. It is
now accepted that the alleged posture was due to disease and that
Neandertal is just a variation of the human kind.
Homo Erectus has been found to have lived side by side with humans,
and did not go extict 200,000 years ago which means he could not be a
"link" either.
Lucy - "The evidence . . makes it overwhelmingly likely that Lucy was
no more than a variety of pigmy chimpanzee, and walked the same way
(awkwardly upright on occasions, but mostly quadrupedal). The
‘evidence’ for the alleged transformation from ape to man is extremely
unconvincing."—A.W. Mehlert, news note, Creation Research Society
Quarterly, December 1985, p. 145
Zinjanthropus boisei - "Nutcracker Man" it had a jaw much larger than
the skull. The skull was very apelike; but some tools were nearby, so
*Leakey decided that it had to be half-human.
Toumai- A Recent Find:
In July 2002, anthropologists announced the discovery of a skull in
Chad with "an unusual mixture of primitive and humanlike features."
The find was dubbed "Toumai" (the name give to children in Chad born
close to the dry season) and was immediately hailed as "the earliest
member of the human family found so far." By October 2002, a number of
scientists went on record to criticize the premature claim --
declaring that the discovery is merely the fossil of an ape.
And the most recent…EBU - the pigmy species named "Homo floresiensis:
The remains of a tiny and hitherto unknown species of human that lived
as recently as 13,000 years ago have been discovered... The skull and
bones of one adult female, and fragments from up to six other
specimens, were found in the Liang Bua limestone caves on Flores
Island, which lies at the eastern tip of Java.
The female skeleton, known as LB1 - or by the nickname "Ebu" - has
been assigned to a new species within the genus Homo - Homo
floresiensis. Examination of the remains shows members of the species
stood just 1 metre tall and had a brain no bigger than a grapefruit.
A handful of stone tools from the same period were also found in the
caves, along with the bones and teeth of several dwarf stegodons, an
ancestor of the modern elephant. Other animal remains, including rats,
bats and fish, show signs that they were cooked around the time H.
floresiensis inhabited in the caves.
....What caused the demise of H. floresiensis is unknown. It is
possible that they were out-competed for food and other resources by
H. sapiens or that they were wiped out by a volcanic eruption about
12,000 years ago.
http://2012.antville.org/topics/Archaeology
"The discovery of a jaw bone, to be reported in Thursday's issue of
the journal Nature, represents the ninth individual belonging to a
group believed to have lived as recently as 12,000 years ago. The
bones are in a wet cave on the island of Flores in the eastern limb of
the Indonesian archipelago, near Australia."
"In 2004, scientists announced their original, sensational discovery
of a delicate skull and partial skeleton of a female, nicknamed
"Hobbit" and believed to be 18,000 years old. In addition, they found
separate bones and fragments of other individuals ranging in age from
12,000 to 95,000 years old." (October 11, 2005 JOSEPH B. VERRENGIA
Associated Press)
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Powell" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
06 Mar 2006 06:23:12 PM |
|
|
"***** Dimwitti" <ZionsFire@att.net> mewled in message
news:bjan02h8f650da6ihulbu0q1ldhhlk2ikq@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
<snip>
Now. Even though THEY have LAWS in their Constitution that guarantees
free speech.... one can easily see how THEY, being only 1 or 2% of the
population do not want the othe 98% of the population to say anything
about the God of Israel.
No, we are just tired of hearing it. Give it a rest, others want to speak.
And they are much more intelligent than you.
Besides, you are not even talking about the God of Israel. You keep
mewling
on about some figment that you have made up with no basis in religious
thought.
James Powell
Well, you keep talking about nothing. Apparently you are such a
coward that you have no counter argument to counter my aruments.
You have yet to put forth an argument that requires a counter. Post
something of substance.
I only keep replying in hopes that I might someday save you from that
monkey cult which has taken control of your mind.
Then you are wasting your time. I reply because it amuses me. I think I will
last longer.
<YAWN>
Been there, done that, countered whatever argument you are trying to make
many times. Try something new.
James Powell
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anno Domini" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
06 Mar 2006 11:06:44 PM |
|
|
James Powell wrote:
"***** Dimwitti" <ZionsFire@att.net> mewled in message
news:bjan02h8f650da6ihulbu0q1ldhhlk2ikq@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
<snip>
Now. Even though THEY have LAWS in their Constitution that guarantees
free speech.... one can easily see how THEY, being only 1 or 2% of the
population do not want the othe 98% of the population to say anything
about the God of Israel.
No, we are just tired of hearing it. Give it a rest, others want to speak.
And they are much more intelligent than you.
Besides, you are not even talking about the God of Israel. You keep
mewling
on about some figment that you have made up with no basis in religious
thought.
James Powell
Well, you keep talking about nothing. Apparently you are such a
coward that you have no counter argument to counter my aruments.
You have yet to put forth an argument that requires a counter. Post
something of substance.
I only keep replying in hopes that I might someday save you from that
monkey cult which has taken control of your mind.
Then you are wasting your time. I reply because it amuses me. I think I will
last longer.
<YAWN>
Been there, done that, countered whatever argument you are trying to make
many times. Try something new.
James Powell
I did and it didn't work. I offered you the chance of not replying to
my post's and me yours..... but you couldn't resist.
And so I keep reminding you of the TRUTH of the Lord Jesus who rose
from the dead.
say uncle,
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Powell" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
08 Mar 2006 05:17:18 PM |
|
|
"Anno Domini" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:c0cq02lpipsgbnrllkdivr3nr5tl7i6rnl@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"***** Dimwitti" <ZionsFire@att.net> mewled in message
news:bjan02h8f650da6ihulbu0q1ldhhlk2ikq@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
<snip>
Now. Even though THEY have LAWS in their Constitution that guarantees
free speech.... one can easily see how THEY, being only 1 or 2% of the
population do not want the othe 98% of the population to say anything
about the God of Israel.
No, we are just tired of hearing it. Give it a rest, others want to
speak.
And they are much more intelligent than you.
Besides, you are not even talking about the God of Israel. You keep
mewling
on about some figment that you have made up with no basis in religious
thought.
James Powell
Well, you keep talking about nothing. Apparently you are such a
coward that you have no counter argument to counter my aruments.
You have yet to put forth an argument that requires a counter. Post
something of substance.
I only keep replying in hopes that I might someday save you from that
monkey cult which has taken control of your mind.
Then you are wasting your time. I reply because it amuses me. I think I
will
last longer.
<YAWN>
Been there, done that, countered whatever argument you are trying to make
many times. Try something new.
James Powell
I did and it didn't work. I offered you the chance of not replying to
my post's and me yours..... but you couldn't resist.
I see that you could not either. Nothing is stopping you from disappearing
or not responding.
And so I keep reminding you of the TRUTH of the Lord Jesus who rose
from the dead.
Sorry, no TRUTH to be seen from you.
say uncle,
aunt
James Powell
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anno Domini" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
09 Mar 2006 08:46:47 PM |
|
|
James Powell wrote:
"Anno Domini" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:c0cq02lpipsgbnrllkdivr3nr5tl7i6rnl@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"***** Dimwitti" <ZionsFire@att.net> mewled in message
news:bjan02h8f650da6ihulbu0q1ldhhlk2ikq@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
<snip>
Now. Even though THEY have LAWS in their Constitution that guarantees
free speech.... one can easily see how THEY, being only 1 or 2% of the
population do not want the othe 98% of the population to say anything
about the God of Israel.
No, we are just tired of hearing it. Give it a rest, others want to
speak.
And they are much more intelligent than you.
Besides, you are not even talking about the God of Israel. You keep
mewling
on about some figment that you have made up with no basis in religious
thought.
James Powell
Well, you keep talking about nothing. Apparently you are such a
coward that you have no counter argument to counter my aruments.
You have yet to put forth an argument that requires a counter. Post
something of substance.
I only keep replying in hopes that I might someday save you from that
monkey cult which has taken control of your mind.
Then you are wasting your time. I reply because it amuses me. I think I
will
last longer.
<YAWN>
Been there, done that, countered whatever argument you are trying to make
many times. Try something new.
James Powell
I did and it didn't work. I offered you the chance of not replying to
my post's and me yours..... but you couldn't resist.
I see that you could not either. Nothing is stopping you from disappearing
or not responding.
And so I keep reminding you of the TRUTH of the Lord Jesus who rose
from the dead.
Sorry, no TRUTH to be seen from you.
say uncle,
aunt
James Powell
So basically you're saying that it is perfectly logical to believe
(have faith in) the notion that man, through eons of mutations,
evolved from a chimpanzee like critter (which evolved from a rat like
critter which evolved from an amoeba which sprang from a mud puddle)
(which no one witnessed) ... but that it is totally futile to have
faith in the eyewitnessed event of a man rising from the dead?
You're welcome. I mean it took quite a bit of thought for me to
explain your religious views in one sentance for you and then compare
them to mine in the same sentence.
at your service,
Jd A.D. 2006
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Powell" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
11 Mar 2006 02:06:09 PM |
|
|
"Anno Domini" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:m402121aalgkvugqvm942m32jq3cplch0g@4ax.com...
<snip>
So basically you're saying that it is perfectly logical to believe
(have faith in) the notion that man, through eons of mutations,
evolved from a chimpanzee like critter (which evolved from a rat like
critter which evolved from an amoeba which sprang from a mud puddle)
(which no one witnessed) ... but that it is totally futile to have
faith in the eyewitnessed event of a man rising from the dead?
It takes neither faith nor belief for evolution to be readily apparent. The
evidence from many different sources and lines of study all converge on the
best explanation for evolution, which we refer to as evolutionary theory. We
have many pieces of evidence, facts if you will, showing that humans,
chimpanzees and rats all share a similar origin and common ancestry at some
point. In fact, ALL life on earth shows this commonality, which leads to the
conclusion that there may have been a single point of origin for life on
this planet. The theory for the origin is still being developed and is a
tangental question to evolution in any case.
As to your view, you can 'believe' whatever you like, it is not science. You
cannot produce your 'eyewitness' to this event. At best, you have hearsay
evidence written down years after the supposed event occurred.
BTW - I can probably scare up a number of eyewitnesses who have seen a man
rise from the dead. We have been reviving clinically dead people for quite
some time now.
You're welcome. I mean it took quite a bit of thought for me to
explain your religious views in one sentance for you and then compare
them to mine in the same sentence.
And you did your normal, ***** poor job.
at your service,
Then, please go away.
James Powell
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anno Domini" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
12 Mar 2006 11:25:03 AM |
|
|
James Powell wrote:
"Anno Domini" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:m402121aalgkvugqvm942m32jq3cplch0g@4ax.com...
<snip>
So basically you're saying that it is perfectly logical to believe
(have faith in) the notion that man, through eons of mutations,
evolved from a chimpanzee like critter (which evolved from a rat like
critter which evolved from an amoeba which sprang from a mud puddle)
(which no one witnessed) ... but that it is totally futile to have
faith in the eyewitnessed event of a man rising from the dead?
It takes neither faith nor belief for evolution to be readily apparent. The
evidence from many different sources and lines of study all converge on the
best explanation for evolution, which we refer to as evolutionary theory. We
have many pieces of evidence, facts if you will, showing that humans,
chimpanzees and rats all share a similar origin and common ancestry at some
point. In fact, ALL life on earth shows this commonality, which leads to the
conclusion that there may have been a single point of origin for life on
this planet. The theory for the origin is still being developed and is a
tangental question to evolution in any case.
As to your view, you can 'believe' whatever you like, it is not science. You
cannot produce your 'eyewitness' to this event. At best, you have hearsay
evidence written down years after the supposed event occurred.
BTW - I can probably scare up a number of eyewitnesses who have seen a man
rise from the dead. We have been reviving clinically dead people for quite
some time now.
You're welcome. I mean it took quite a bit of thought for me to
explain your religious views in one sentance for you and then compare
them to mine in the same sentence.
And you did your normal, ***** poor job.
at your service,
Then, please go away.
James Powell
No. Jesus created everything and existed before the universe itself
was created.
Ephesians 3:8-9 "Unto me, who am less than the least of all saints, is
this grace given, that I should preach among the Gentiles the
unsearchable riches of Christ; And to make all men see what is the
fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath
been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ"
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Powell" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
12 Mar 2006 12:16:36 PM |
|
|
"***** Dimnitti" <ZionsFire@att.net> scrawled in message
news:5es812hm4uvjpa4ucb6voq3nf53usjs96g@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"***** Dimnitti" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:m402121aalgkvugqvm942m32jq3cplch0g@4ax.com...
<snip>
So basically you're saying that it is perfectly logical to believe
(have faith in) the notion that man, through eons of mutations,
evolved from a chimpanzee like critter (which evolved from a rat like
critter which evolved from an amoeba which sprang from a mud puddle)
(which no one witnessed) ... but that it is totally futile to have
faith in the eyewitnessed event of a man rising from the dead?
It takes neither faith nor belief for evolution to be readily apparent.
The
evidence from many different sources and lines of study all converge on
the
best explanation for evolution, which we refer to as evolutionary theory.
We
have many pieces of evidence, facts if you will, showing that humans,
chimpanzees and rats all share a similar origin and common ancestry at
some
point. In fact, ALL life on earth shows this commonality, which leads to
the
conclusion that there may have been a single point of origin for life on
this planet. The theory for the origin is still being developed and is a
tangental question to evolution in any case.
As to your view, you can 'believe' whatever you like, it is not science.
You
cannot produce your 'eyewitness' to this event. At best, you have hearsay
evidence written down years after the supposed event occurred.
BTW - I can probably scare up a number of eyewitnesses who have seen a man
rise from the dead. We have been reviving clinically dead people for quite
some time now.
You're welcome. I mean it took quite a bit of thought for me to
explain your religious views in one sentance for you and then compare
them to mine in the same sentence.
And you did your normal, ***** poor job.
at your service,
Then, please go away.
James Powell
No. Jesus created everything and existed before the universe itself
was created.
Again with the book. You have yet to provide any objective evidence for any
of your caterwauling.
James Powell
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anno Domini" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
12 Mar 2006 05:04:43 PM |
|
|
James Powell wrote:
"***** Dimnitti" <ZionsFire@att.net> scrawled in message
news:5es812hm4uvjpa4ucb6voq3nf53usjs96g@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"***** Dimnitti" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:m402121aalgkvugqvm942m32jq3cplch0g@4ax.com...
<snip>
So basically you're saying that it is perfectly logical to believe
(have faith in) the notion that man, through eons of mutations,
evolved from a chimpanzee like critter (which evolved from a rat like
critter which evolved from an amoeba which sprang from a mud puddle)
(which no one witnessed) ... but that it is totally futile to have
faith in the eyewitnessed event of a man rising from the dead?
It takes neither faith nor belief for evolution to be readily apparent.
The
evidence from many different sources and lines of study all converge on
the
best explanation for evolution, which we refer to as evolutionary theory.
We
have many pieces of evidence, facts if you will, showing that humans,
chimpanzees and rats all share a similar origin and common ancestry at
some
point. In fact, ALL life on earth shows this commonality, which leads to
the
conclusion that there may have been a single point of origin for life on
this planet. The theory for the origin is still being developed and is a
tangental question to evolution in any case.
As to your view, you can 'believe' whatever you like, it is not science.
You
cannot produce your 'eyewitness' to this event. At best, you have hearsay
evidence written down years after the supposed event occurred.
BTW - I can probably scare up a number of eyewitnesses who have seen a man
rise from the dead. We have been reviving clinically dead people for quite
some time now.
You're welcome. I mean it took quite a bit of thought for me to
explain your religious views in one sentance for you and then compare
them to mine in the same sentence.
And you did your normal, ***** poor job.
at your service,
Then, please go away.
James Powell
No. Jesus created everything and existed before the universe itself
was created.
Again with the book. You have yet to provide any objective evidence for any
of your caterwauling.
James Powell
OK. How some legal "books"?
IN THE Supreme Court of the United States
ELK GROVE UNITED SCHOOL DISTRICT
and DAVID W. GORDEN,Petitioners,
v.
MICHAEL A. NEWDOW, Respondent.
On Writ of Certiorari to the
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
"Every President of the United States, since Washington,
has taken the Oath of Office with his hand placed upon the
Bible. Engle v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421, 436 (1962)."
"EveryPresident has ended his Oath with, "So help me, God." Id. At
436. "
"Every President, without exception, has acknowledged
God upon entering office"
(Here's the first 10 for example):
George Washington, 1st, "... that Almighty Being who
rules over the universe..." Paul M. Angle, ed., By These Words,
Washington’s First Inaugural Address, April 30. 1789, p.185
(1954), citing James D. Richardson, A Compilation of the
Messages and Papers of the Presidents, 1789-1897
(Washington, 1899), VI, pp. 445-59;
John Adams, 2nd, "... that Being who is supreme over
all, the Patron of Order, the Fountain of Justice..." Inaugural
Addresses of the Presidents of the United States (1989);
Thomas Jefferson, 3rd, "And may that Infinite Power
which rules the destinies of the universe lead our councils to
what is best, and give them a favorable issue for your peace and
prosperity." Angle, Jefferson’s First Inaugural Address, March
4, 1801, p.226 (1954); Lee v. Weisman, 505 U.S. 577, 634
(1992), citing Inaugural Addresses of the Presidents, S. Doc.
101-10, p. 17;
James Madison, 4th, "... that Almighty Being whose
power regulates the destiny of nations, whose blessings have
been so conspicuously dispensed to this rising Republic, and to
whom we are bound to address our devout gratitude for the
past, as well as our fervent supplications and best hopes for the
future." Lee v. Weisman, 505 U.S. at 634, citing Inaugural
Addresses at p. 28;
James Monroe, 5th, "... with a firm reliance on the
protection of Almighty God..." Inaugural Addresses;
John Quincy Adams, 6th, "... knowing that ‘Except the
Lord keep the city, the watchman waketh in vain’..." Id.;
Andrew Jackson, 7th, "... my fervent prayer to that
Almighty Being before whom I now stand..." Id.;
Martin Van Buren, 8th, "... that Divine Being whose
strengthening support I humbly solicit..." Id.;
William Henry Harrison, 9th, "... the Beneficent Creator
has made no distinction amongst men..." Id.;
John Tyler, 10th, "... the all-wise and all-powerful Being
who made me..." Id.;
Books, books and more books......
"Having undertaken for the Glory of God, and
Advancement of the Christian Faith, and the Honour of King
and Country, a Voyage to plant the first Colony in the northern
parts of Virginia; Do by these Presents, solemnly and mutually,
in the Presence of God and one another, covenant and combine
ourselves together into a civil Body ... ."The Mayflower Compact
Sooner or later you guys will have grab hold of the internet and keep
all the "BOOKS' out of the hands of WE THE (free) PEOPLE.
Books, books and Books a million. Here are quotes mentioning God from
the Government books of all 50 States of the U.S.A.
Alabama 1901, Preamble. We the people of the State of Alabama,
invoking the favor and guidance of Almighty God, do ordain and
establish the following Constitution ..
Alaska 1956, Preamble. We, the people of Alaska, grateful to God and
to those who founded our nation and pioneered this great land ..
Arizona 1911, Preamble. We, the people of the State of Arizona,
grateful to Almighty God for our liberties, do ordain this
Constitution...
Arkansas 1874, Preamble. We, the people of the State of Arkansas,
grateful to Almighty God for the privilege of choosing our own form of
government...
California 1879, Preamble. We, the People of the State of California,
grateful to Almighty God for our freedom .
Colorado 1876, Preamble. We, the people of Colorado, with profound
reverence for the Supreme Ruler of Universe .
Connecticut 1818, Preamble. The People of Connecticut, acknowledging
with gratitude the good Providence of God in permitting them to enjoy
....
Delaware 1897, Preamble. Through Divine Goodness all men have, by
nature, the rights of worshipping and serving their Creator according
to the dictates of their consciences .
Florida 1845, Preamble. We, the people of the State of Florida,
grateful to Almighty God for our constitutional liberty ... establish
this Constitution...
Georgia 1777, Preamble. We, the people of Georgia, relying upon
protection and guidance of Almighty God, do ordain and establish this
Constitution...
Hawaii 1959, Preamble. We, the people of Hawaii, Grateful for Divine
Guidance . establish this Constitution
Idaho 1889, Preamble. We, the people of the State of Idaho, grateful
to Almighty God for our freedom, to secure its blessings ..
Illinois 1870, Preamble. We, the people of the State of Illinois,
grateful to Almighty God for the civil, political and religious
liberty which He hath so long permitted us to enjoy and looking to Him
for a blessing on our endeavors.
Indiana 1851, Preamble. We, the People of the State of Indiana,
grateful to Almighty God for the free exercise of the right to chose
our form of government..
Iowa 1857, Preamble. We, the People of the State of Iowa, grateful to
the Supreme Being for the blessings hitherto enjoyed, and feeling our
dependence on Him for a continuation of these blessings ... establish
this Constitution
Kansas 1859, Preamble. We, the people of Kansas, grateful to Almighty
God for our civil and religious privileges . establish this
Constitution.
Kentucky 1891, Preamble. We, the people of the Commonwealth of
grateful to Almighty God for the civil, political and religious
liberties...
Louisiana 1921, Preamble. We, the people of the State of Louisiana,
grateful to Almighty God for the civil, political and religious
liberties we enjoy ..
Maine 1820, Preamble. We the People of Maine .. acknowledging with
grateful hearts the goodness of the Sovereign Ruler of the Universe in
affording us an opportunity ... and imploring His aid and direction
Maryland 1776, Preamble. We, the people of the state of Maryland,
grateful to Almighty God or our civil and religious liberty...
Massachusetts 1780, Preamble. We...the people of Massachusetts,
acknowledging with grateful hearts, the goodness of the Great
Legislator of the Universe...in the course of His Providence, an
opportunity and devoutly imploring His direction ...
Michigan 1908, Preamble. We, the people of the State of Michigan,
grateful to Almighty God for the blessings of freedom ... establish
this Constitution
Minnesota, 1857, Preamble. We, the people of the State of Minnesota,
grateful to God for our civil and religious liberty, and desiring to
perpetuate its blessings
Mississippi 1890, Preamble. We, the people of Mississippi in
convention assembled, grateful to Almighty God, and invoking His
blessing on our work.
Missouri 1845, Preamble. We, the people of Missouri, with profound
reverence for the Supreme Ruler of the Universe, and grateful for His
goodness ...establish this Constitution ..
Montana 1889, Preamble. We, the people of Montana, grateful to
Almighty God for the blessings of liberty establish this Constitution
...
Nebraska 1875, Preamble. We, the people, grateful to Almighty God for
our freedom .. establish this Constitution
Nevada 1864, Preamble. We the people of the State of Nevada, grateful
to Almighty God for our freedom . establish this Constitution ..
New Hampshire 1792, Part I. Art. I. Sec. V. Every individual has a
natural and unalienable right to worship God according to the dictates
of his own conscience .
New Jersey 1844, Preamble. We, the people of the State of New Jersey,
grateful to Almighty God for civil and religious liberty which He hath
so long permitted us to enjoy, and looking to Him for a blessing on
our endeavors.
New Mexico 1911, Preamble. We, the People of New Mexico, grateful to
Almighty God for the blessings of liberty ..
New York 1846, Preamble. We, the people of the State of New York,
grateful to Almighty God for our freedom, in order to secure its
blessings .
North Carolina 1868, Preamble. We the people of the State of North
Carolina, grateful to Almighty God, the Sovereign Ruler of Nations,
for our civil, political, and religious liberties, and acknowledging
our dependence upon Him for the continuance of those
North Dakota 1889, Preamble. We, the people of North Dakota, grateful
to Almighty God for the blessings of civil and religious liberty, do
ordain...
Ohio 1852, Preamble. We the people of the state of Ohio, grateful to
Almighty God for our freedom, to secure its blessings and to promote
our common..
Oklahoma 1907, Preamble. Invoking the guidance of Almighty God, in
order to secure and perpetuate the blessings of liberty ... establish
this
Oregon 1857, Bill of Rights, Article I. Section 2. All men shall be
secure in the Natural right, to worship Almighty God according to the
dictates of their consciences .
Pennsylvania 1776, Preamble. We, the people of Pennsylvania, grateful
to Almighty God for the blessings of civil and religious liberty, and
humbly invoking His guidance
Rhode Island 1842, Preamble. We the People of the State of Rhode
Island grateful to Almighty God for the civil and religious liberty
which He hath so long permitted us to enjoy, and looking to Him for a
blessing
South Carolina, 1778, Preamble. We, the people of the State of South
Carolina grateful to God for our liberties, do ordain and establish
this Constitution
South Dakota 1889, Preamble. We, the people of South Dakota, grateful
to Almighty God for our civil and religious liberties . establish this
Tennessee 1796, Art. XI.III. That all men have a natural and
indefeasible right to worship Almighty God according to the dictates
of their conscience...
Texas 1845, Preamble. We the People of the Republic of Texas,
acknowledging, with gratitude, the grace and beneficence of God
Utah 1896, Preamble. Grateful to Almighty God for life and liberty, we
establish this Constitution .
Vermont 1777, Preamble. Whereas all government ought to ... enable the
individuals who compose it to enjoy their natural rights, and other
blessings which the Author of Existence has bestowed on man ...
Virginia 1776, Bill of Rights, XVI ... Religion, or the Duty which we
owe our Creator . can be directed only by Reason ... and that it is
the mutual duty of all to practice Christian Forbearance, Love and
Charity towards each other...
Washington 1889, Preamble. We the People of the State of Washington,
grateful to the Supreme Ruler of the Universe for our liberties, do
ordain this Constitution .
West Virginia 1872, Preamble. Since through Divine Providence we enjoy
the blessings of civil, political and religious liberty, we, the
people of West Virginia .. reaffirm our faith in and constant reliance
upon God .
Wisconsin 1848, Preamble. We, the people of Wisconsin, grateful to
Almighty God for our freedom, domestic tranquility
Wyoming 1890, Preamble. We, the people of the State of Wyoming,
grateful to God for our civil, political, and religious liberties ...
establish this Constitution .
Now science books cannot mention God.
Jd
"Believe in the Lord your God, so shall ye be established; believe his
prophets, so shall ye prosper". (2Chronicles 20:20)
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Powell" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
12 Mar 2006 05:21:10 PM |
|
|
"***** Dimwit" <ZionsFire@att.net> scribbled in message
news:iaf9121ttaqj8lanejh71ivg6u80cjfqre@4ax.com...i
James Powell wrote:
"***** Dimnitti" <ZionsFire@att.net> scrawled in message
news:5es812hm4uvjpa4ucb6voq3nf53usjs96g@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"***** Dimnitti" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:m402121aalgkvugqvm942m32jq3cplch0g@4ax.com...
<snip>
So basically you're saying that it is perfectly logical to believe
(have faith in) the notion that man, through eons of mutations,
evolved from a chimpanzee like critter (which evolved from a rat like
critter which evolved from an amoeba which sprang from a mud puddle)
(which no one witnessed) ... but that it is totally futile to have
faith in the eyewitnessed event of a man rising from the dead?
It takes neither faith nor belief for evolution to be readily apparent.
The
evidence from many different sources and lines of study all converge on
the
best explanation for evolution, which we refer to as evolutionary
theory.
We
have many pieces of evidence, facts if you will, showing that humans,
chimpanzees and rats all share a similar origin and common ancestry at
some
point. In fact, ALL life on earth shows this commonality, which leads to
the
conclusion that there may have been a single point of origin for life on
this planet. The theory for the origin is still being developed and is a
tangental question to evolution in any case.
As to your view, you can 'believe' whatever you like, it is not science.
You
cannot produce your 'eyewitness' to this event. At best, you have
hearsay
evidence written down years after the supposed event occurred.
BTW - I can probably scare up a number of eyewitnesses who have seen a
man
rise from the dead. We have been reviving clinically dead people for
quite
some time now.
You're welcome. I mean it took quite a bit of thought for me to
explain your religious views in one sentance for you and then compare
them to mine in the same sentence.
And you did your normal, ***** poor job.
at your service,
Then, please go away.
James Powell
No. Jesus created everything and existed before the universe itself
was created.
Again with the book. You have yet to provide any objective evidence for
any
of your caterwauling.
James Powell
OK. How some legal "books"?
What is this steaming pile suppose to prove?
You are trying to prove the existence of God and Jesus because they appear
in documents?
We went through this before. You have just allowed the existence of every
creature ever written about.
Cthulhu awaits.
James Powell
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anno Domini" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
15 Mar 2006 09:28:19 PM |
|
|
James Powell wrote:
You are trying to prove the existence of God and Jesus because they appear
in documents?
No. I'm telling you that so many folks have had faith in the gospel I
preach that as a result.... the year is 2006 worldwide (2006 years
since the birth of Jesus), even in China; which means that your very
birthdate acknowledges Jesus Christ, your money has "in God we trust"
on it which is your national motto, your pledge has the phrase "one
nation under God" in it, all your Presidents swear an oath with their
hand on the Holy Bible saying "so help me God", and that all 50 States
of the U.S.A acknowledge God in their official State documents, 90% or
greater of all Americans believe in God (with 80% or greater being
Christian)..... and lastly but not leastly, that you sir have your
head buried in the sand and have no clue WRT the latter day apostacy
as foretold in the Holy Bible.
And that is primarily because you've been listening to men and not
God, and have become deceived despite the warnings of God.
"Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come,
except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be
revealed, the son of perdition; Who opposeth and exalteth himself
above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God
sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God."
(2 Thessalonians 2:3-4)
Anno Domini" is Latin for "in the year of Our Lord", referring to Our
Lord Jesus Christ. That is, "AD 1996" literally means "in the 1996'th
year since the birth of the Christ."
http://www.radix.net/~dglenn/defs/ce.html
Jd A.D. 2006
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Powell" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
16 Mar 2006 05:44:37 PM |
|
|
"Anno Domini" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:akoh12p05qok1b9p5b043selv851819p6g@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
You are trying to prove the existence of God and Jesus because they appear
in documents?
No. I'm telling you that so many folks have had faith in the gospel I
preach that as a result.... the year is 2006 worldwide (2006 years
since the birth of Jesus),
Incorrect. It was decided to conform to that calendar through happenstance.
Furthermore, it has been ppointed out to you many times that Biblical
scholars agree that Jesus was NOT born '2006' years ago.
Furthermore, it gives no credence to the concept that Jesus ever existed.
James Powell
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anno Domini" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
19 Mar 2006 08:54:38 PM |
|
|
James Powell wrote:
"Anno Domini" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:akoh12p05qok1b9p5b043selv851819p6g@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
You are trying to prove the existence of God and Jesus because they appear
in documents?
No. I'm telling you that so many folks have had faith in the gospel I
preach that as a result.... the year is 2006 worldwide (2006 years
since the birth of Jesus),
Incorrect. It was decided to conform to that calendar through happenstance.
Furthermore, it has been ppointed out to you many times that Biblical
scholars agree that Jesus was NOT born '2006' years ago.
Furthermore, it gives no credence to the concept that Jesus ever existed.
James Powell
What *does* it give credence to?
Jd
"Anno Domini Nostri Iesu Christi ("In the Year of Our Lord Jesus
Christ"), commonly shortened to Anno Domini ("In the Year of the
Lord"), abbreviated as AD or A.D., is the designation used to number
years in the Christian Era, conventionally used with the Julian and
Gregorian calendars. It defines an epoch based on the
traditionally-reckoned year of the birth of Jesus."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anno_Domini
.
|
|
|
| User: "James Powell" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
20 Mar 2006 04:54:52 PM |
|
|
"***** Dimini" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:2dds12p0nfunifs5n2m3aqpak0hli11bhs@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"Anno Domini" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:akoh12p05qok1b9p5b043selv851819p6g@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
You are trying to prove the existence of God and Jesus because they
appear
in documents?
No. I'm telling you that so many folks have had faith in the gospel I
preach that as a result.... the year is 2006 worldwide (2006 years
since the birth of Jesus),
Incorrect. It was decided to conform to that calendar through
happenstance.
Furthermore, it has been ppointed out to you many times that Biblical
scholars agree that Jesus was NOT born '2006' years ago.
Furthermore, it gives no credence to the concept that Jesus ever existed.
James Powell
What *does* it give credence to?
Jd
That humans can agree on a common way to represent the passage of time.
James Powell
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Wally Anglesea™" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
17 Mar 2006 02:06:57 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 18:44:37 -0500, "James Powell" <james@example.com>
wrote:
"Anno Domini" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:akoh12p05qok1b9p5b043selv851819p6g@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
You are trying to prove the existence of God and Jesus because they appear
in documents?
No. I'm telling you that so many folks have had faith in the gospel I
preach that as a result.... the year is 2006 worldwide (2006 years
since the birth of Jesus),
Incorrect. It was decided to conform to that calendar through happenstance.
Besides, this is pretty accurate:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AD#Numbering_of_years
and this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregorian_calendar
Furthermore, it has been ppointed out to you many times that Biblical
scholars agree that Jesus was NOT born '2006' years ago.
Besides, it was worked out by a monk, working for Pope Gregory.
Furthermore, it gives no credence to the concept that Jesus ever existed.
James Powell
--
Maj. General, Fanatic Legions.
Commander of Southern Hemisphere Forces.
Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Chunder" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
12 Mar 2006 05:15:39 AM |
|
|
Anno Domini wrote:
James Powell wrote:
"Anno Domini" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:c0cq02lpipsgbnrllkdivr3nr5tl7i6rnl@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"***** Dimwitti" <ZionsFire@att.net> mewled in message
news:bjan02h8f650da6ihulbu0q1ldhhlk2ikq@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
<snip>
Now. Even though THEY have LAWS in their Constitution that guarantees
free speech.... one can easily see how THEY, being only 1 or 2% of the
population do not want the othe 98% of the population to say anything
about the God of Israel.
No, we are just tired of hearing it. Give it a rest, others want to
speak.
And they are much more intelligent than you.
Besides, you are not even talking about the God of Israel. You keep
mewling
on about some figment that you have made up with no basis in religious
thought.
James Powell
Well, you keep talking about nothing. Apparently you are such a
coward that you have no counter argument to counter my aruments.
You have yet to put forth an argument that requires a counter. Post
something of substance.
I only keep replying in hopes that I might someday save you from that
monkey cult which has taken control of your mind.
Then you are wasting your time. I reply because it amuses me. I think I
will
last longer.
<YAWN>
Been there, done that, countered whatever argument you are trying to make
many times. Try something new.
James Powell
I did and it didn't work. I offered you the chance of not replying to
my post's and me yours..... but you couldn't resist.
I see that you could not either. Nothing is stopping you from disappearing
or not responding.
And so I keep reminding you of the TRUTH of the Lord Jesus who rose
from the dead.
Sorry, no TRUTH to be seen from you.
say uncle,
aunt
James Powell
So basically you're saying that it is perfectly logical to believe
(have faith in) the notion that man, through eons of mutations,
evolved from a chimpanzee like critter (which evolved from a rat like
critter which evolved from an amoeba which sprang from a mud puddle)
(which no one witnessed) ...
Well it's like this. Evolution can be tested against the evidence and it
is consistent. That's even though most of the evidence, be it fossilized
remains, DNA analysis etc. was discovered after Darwin put forward his
theory. Every bone dug out of the ground is a potential opportunity for
evolution to be falsified but in 150 years it hasn't happened.
Why is that? Instead, all of the evidence supports evolution.
Additionally, evolution can be observed in nature, in domestic animals,
pest control and in the lab. It's a fact as a well as a theory.
As for abiogenesis... no one has ever suggested that an amoeba (being a
complex single celled organism) sprang from nothing, so you're being
disingenuous. Nor does it matter how life started for evolution to be a
fact and readily observable.
but that it is totally futile to have
faith in the eyewitnessed event of a man rising from the dead?
Yes. Witnessed according to a distorted, subsequently edited, highly
inconsistent book written over thousands of years. Hearsay abounds
through the book. Very little of the bible is testable, least of all the
pronouncements of the schizophrenic god or his self-claimed son. It
certainly is no more valid than the thousands of contradictory creation
myths that other tribes throughout history have come up with.
You're welcome. I mean it took quite a bit of thought for me to
explain your religious views in one sentance for you and then compare
them to mine in the same sentence.
at your service,
Jd A.D. 2006
Evolution isn't a religion. It happens. It's observable. No faith is
required for it to happen or be observed.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anno Domini" |
|
| Title: Re: Standard Deviation of Evolution: 2006 A.D. |
12 Mar 2006 11:25:04 AM |
|
|
Cardinal Chunder wrote:
Anno Domini wrote:
James Powell wrote:
"Anno Domini" <ZionsFire@att.net> wrote in message
news:c0cq02lpipsgbnrllkdivr3nr5tl7i6rnl@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
"***** Dimwitti" <ZionsFire@att.net> mewled in message
news:bjan02h8f650da6ihulbu0q1ldhhlk2ikq@4ax.com...
James Powell wrote:
<snip>
Now. Even though THEY have LAWS in their Constitution that guarantees
free speech.... one can easily see how THEY, being only 1 or 2% of the
population do not want the othe 98% of the population to say anything
about the God of Israel.
No, we are just tired of hearing it. Give it a rest, others want to
speak.
And they are much more intelligent than you.
Besides, you are not even talking about the God of Israel. You keep
mewling
on about some figment that you have made up with no basis in religious
thought.
James Powell
Well, you keep talking about nothing. Apparently you are such a
coward that you have no counter argument to counter my aruments.
You have yet to put forth an argument that requires a counter. Post
something of substance.
I only keep replying in hopes that I might someday save you from that
monkey cult which has taken control of your mind.
Then you are wasting your time. I reply because it amuses me. I think I
will
last longer.
<YAWN>
Been there, done that, countered whatever argument you are trying to make
many times. Try something new.
James Powell
I did and it didn't work. I offered you the chance of not replying to
my post's and me yours..... but you couldn't resist.
I see that you could not either. Nothing is stopping you from disappearing
or not responding.
And so I keep reminding you of the TRUTH of the Lord Jesus who rose
from the dead.
Sorry, no TRUTH to be seen from you.
say uncle,
aunt
James Powell
So basically you're saying that it is perfectly logical to believe
(have faith in) the notion that man, through eons of mutations,
evolved from a chimpanzee like critter (which evolved from a rat like
critter which evolved from an amoeba which sprang from a mud puddle)
(which no one witnessed) ...
Well it's like this. Evolution can be tested against the evidence and it
is consistent. That's even though most of the evidence, be it fossilized
remains, DNA analysis etc. was discovered after Darwin put forward his
theory. Every bone dug out of the ground is a potential opportunity for
evolution to be falsified but in 150 years it hasn't happened.
Why is that? Instead, all of the evidence supports evolution.
Additionally, evolution can be observed in nature, in domestic animals,
pest control and in the lab. It's a fact as a well as a theory.
As for abiogenesis... no one has ever suggested that an amoeba (being a
complex single celled organism) sprang from nothing, so you're being
disingenuous....
You're not really a Cardinal.
Nor does it matter how life started for evolution to be a
fact and readily observable.
Since God started li | | | | | | | | | | | | |
