Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast
The New York Times
Posted: 2007-09-02 15:06:23
Filed Under: Nation News
(Sept. 1) - The frantic calls started coming in around 8 p.m., from New
York City all the way south to South Carolina: fireballs from the sky.
Burning boats. Flares. Strobe lights on the water.
The United States Coast Guard, along with Dover Township fire and rescue
workers and commercial salvage ships, sent out boats off Normandy Beach
in New Jersey.
After several hours, the investigators found no sign of distress, no
debris. The Federal Aviation Administration said it was not missing any
commercial aircraft. There were no distress beacons or mayday calls, the
authorities said. So at 11 p.m., the Coast Guard called off the search.
The possible origins of the lights became clearer from a warmer, dryer
locale: a computer.
"Type in 'rare,' 'meteor' and 'National Geographic' into Google," Nyx
Cangemi, a spokesman for the Coast Guard, suggested.
The top hit was about a rare meteor shower, the Aurigid Meteor Shower,
that was expected to be visible Saturday.
It may have taken the East Coast by surprise, however, because astronomers
had predicted that the meteor shower would appear only on the West Coast.
Copyright © 2007 The New York Times Company
2007-09-02 06:51:55
http://news.aol.com/story/_a/strange-sights-reported-over-east-coast/20070902064909990001
.
|
|
| User: "The Last 1935 Days....HOOROO !" |
|
| Title: Re: Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast |
04 Sep 2007 01:11:11 AM |
|
|
Gary, Uncle Wally has a hankering for the pic of the half naked
Christina Ricci pic of her in the bathtub with those perky
titties !!!!
Are there any movies in which she appears **FULLY** naked, front-bum &
all !!!
If so, what are they ?!?!??!
Gotta get 'em on DVD tomorrow !!!
Thanksamundo !!!
As a sultress:
http://extracine.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/christina-ricci.jpg
As herself:
http://www.celebrityspud.com/images/female-celebrities/christina-ricci/thum=
b=2Ejpg
HOOROO
UNCLE WALLY
---00---
Sep 4, 3:53 pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast
The New York Times
Posted: 2007-09-02 15:06:23
Filed Under: Nation News
(Sept. 1) - The frantic calls started coming in around 8 p.m., from New
York City all the way south to South Carolina: fireballs from the sky.
Burning boats. Flares. Strobe lights on the water.
The United States Coast Guard, along with Dover Township fire and rescue
workers and commercial salvage ships, sent out boats off Normandy Beach
in New Jersey.
After several hours, the investigators found no sign of distress, no
debris. The Federal Aviation Administration said it was not missing any
commercial aircraft. There were no distress beacons or mayday calls, the
authorities said. So at 11 p.m., the Coast Guard called off the search.
The possible origins of the lights became clearer from a warmer, dryer
locale: a computer.
"Type in 'rare,' 'meteor' and 'National Geographic' into Google," Nyx
Cangemi, a spokesman for the Coast Guard, suggested.
The top hit was about a rare meteor shower, the Aurigid Meteor Shower,
that was expected to be visible Saturday.
It may have taken the East Coast by surprise, however, because astronomers
had predicted that the meteor shower would appear only on the West Coast.
Copyright =A9 2007 The New York Times Company
2007-09-02 06:51:55http://news.aol.com/story/_a/strange-sights-reported-o=
ver-east-coast/...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Docrodile" |
|
| Title: Re: Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast |
04 Sep 2007 07:47:55 PM |
|
|
"The Last 1935 Days....HOOROO !" <stargatedecember2012@yahoo.ca> wrote in
message news:1188886271.900946.147060@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
Gary, Uncle Wally has a hankering for the pic of the half naked
Christina Ricci pic of her in the bathtub with those perky
titties !!!!
Are there any movies in which she appears **FULLY** naked, front-bum &
all !!!
If so, what are they ?!?!??!
Gotta get 'em on DVD tomorrow !!!
Thanksamundo !!!
As a sultress:
http://extracine.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/christina-ricci.jpg
As herself:
http://www.celebrityspud.com/images/female-celebrities/christina-ricci/thumb.jpg
HOOROO
UNCLE WALLY
---00---
http://www.jsrpages.co.uk/scansr/ricci/s2.htm
I won't be responsible for any detrimental health effects -- like a stroke
or heart attack -- that exposure of Ricci's sultry face and super fine
body might cause!
Doc :))~
Sep 4, 3:53 pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast
The New York Times
Posted: 2007-09-02 15:06:23
Filed Under: Nation News
(Sept. 1) - The frantic calls started coming in around 8 p.m., from New
York City all the way south to South Carolina: fireballs from the sky.
Burning boats. Flares. Strobe lights on the water.
The United States Coast Guard, along with Dover Township fire and rescue
workers and commercial salvage ships, sent out boats off Normandy Beach
in New Jersey.
After several hours, the investigators found no sign of distress, no
debris. The Federal Aviation Administration said it was not missing any
commercial aircraft. There were no distress beacons or mayday calls, the
authorities said. So at 11 p.m., the Coast Guard called off the search.
The possible origins of the lights became clearer from a warmer, dryer
locale: a computer.
"Type in 'rare,' 'meteor' and 'National Geographic' into Google," Nyx
Cangemi, a spokesman for the Coast Guard, suggested.
The top hit was about a rare meteor shower, the Aurigid Meteor Shower,
that was expected to be visible Saturday.
It may have taken the East Coast by surprise, however, because
astronomers
had predicted that the meteor shower would appear only on the West
Coast.
Copyright © 2007 The New York Times Company
2007-09-02
06:51:55http://news.aol.com/story/_a/strange-sights-reported-over-east-coast/...
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Docrodile" |
|
| Title: Re: Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast |
04 Sep 2007 08:24:26 PM |
|
|
"The Last 1935 Days....HOOROO !" <stargatedecember2012@yahoo.ca> wrote in
message news:1188886271.900946.147060@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
Gary, Uncle Wally has a hankering for the pic of the half naked
Christina Ricci pic of her in the bathtub with those perky
titties !!!!
Are there any movies in which she appears **FULLY** naked, front-bum &
all !!!
If so, what are they ?!?!??!
Heeheehee...I got so caught up in looking at Ricci's photos, I forgot to
answer your question. We dirty old men are like that, ya know. NO,
unfortunately for her fans, she hasn't ever appeared *totally* nude, front
and back in any film, so far. The nearest she's come to complete nudity
was in PROZAC NATION. Although the flick itself wasn't a hit, and is
rather dull, Ricci sits fully naked on a bed, but her backside is not
shown. The scene is not a flasher, and you have enough time to study her
extensively and even get to see a bit of her pud if you zoom
in...heeheehee.
You can see salivate over the stills from PROZAC NATION at -
http://www.douglass.co.uk/webpromote/celebs/oops_index.htm
No, the 'douglass' that owns this great free site of nude celebs is not
our prudish Stevie! LOL! And, of course, Stevie will slither over to the
site, if he's not been there many times already, secretly...and then shake
his hypocritically moral finger at people like me for being honest.
Doc :))~
Gotta get 'em on DVD tomorrow !!!
Thanksamundo !!!
As a sultress:
http://extracine.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/christina-ricci.jpg
As herself:
http://www.celebrityspud.com/images/female-celebrities/christina-ricci/thumb.jpg
HOOROO
UNCLE WALLY
---00---
Sep 4, 3:53 pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast
The New York Times
Posted: 2007-09-02 15:06:23
Filed Under: Nation News
(Sept. 1) - The frantic calls started coming in around 8 p.m., from New
York City all the way south to South Carolina: fireballs from the sky.
Burning boats. Flares. Strobe lights on the water.
The United States Coast Guard, along with Dover Township fire and rescue
workers and commercial salvage ships, sent out boats off Normandy Beach
in New Jersey.
After several hours, the investigators found no sign of distress, no
debris. The Federal Aviation Administration said it was not missing any
commercial aircraft. There were no distress beacons or mayday calls, the
authorities said. So at 11 p.m., the Coast Guard called off the search.
The possible origins of the lights became clearer from a warmer, dryer
locale: a computer.
"Type in 'rare,' 'meteor' and 'National Geographic' into Google," Nyx
Cangemi, a spokesman for the Coast Guard, suggested.
The top hit was about a rare meteor shower, the Aurigid Meteor Shower,
that was expected to be visible Saturday.
It may have taken the East Coast by surprise, however, because
astronomers
had predicted that the meteor shower would appear only on the West
Coast.
Copyright © 2007 The New York Times Company
2007-09-02
06:51:55http://news.aol.com/story/_a/strange-sights-reported-over-east-coast/...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast |
04 Sep 2007 08:48:53 PM |
|
|
On Sep 4, 6:24 pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
No, the 'douglass' that owns this great free site of nude celebs is not
our prudish Stevie! LOL! And, of course, Stevie will slither over to the
site, if he's not been there many times already, secretly...and then shake
his hypocritically moral finger at people like me for being honest.
As usual, you're making things up. Have I ever criticized you for
wanting to look at *adult* women? The answer is no. Knock yourself out.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Docrodile" |
|
| Title: Re: Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast |
04 Sep 2007 10:07:18 PM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1188956933.255407.315750@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 4, 6:24 pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
No, the 'douglass' that owns this great free site of nude celebs is not
our prudish Stevie! LOL! And, of course, Stevie will slither over to
the
site, if he's not been there many times already, secretly...and then
shake
his hypocritically moral finger at people like me for being honest.
As usual, you're making things up. Have I ever criticized you for
wanting to look at *adult* women? The answer is no. Knock yourself out.
Hmmmm....I've noticed that since the nude celeb topic surfaced, you've not
posted any more this evening, so far.
Spending a lot of time checking out the naked chicks?
"Adult women" by which nation's legal definition? Certainly, two-thirds of
the nations of the world have a different definition than America's.
I think it's more appropriate, accurate to consider that "consensual" sex
between legally-aged partners not only is a reality in much of the world,
but impossible to prevent. Since punishment is the only viable recourse,
what is it that these people have done BIBLICALLY or morally wrong? You
give me a 'cite' in the Bible that clearly defines age restrictions from
God or Jesus on consensual human sexual liaisons.
You're not the judge of who should seek out sexual enjoyment with whom, or
what age, Stevie...not you, not the government, social conformists,
churches, or any others. The only people who should be defining the
parameters of these intimate relations are the willing participants
themselves.
It's called 'the pursuit of happiness', Stevie, for fascist farts like
yourself who'd like to use their own prudish morality overlayed onto
others' private lives, and see them severely punished. You are a sick,
sadistic, sad man for wanting to do that, but you certainly are
enthusiastic about warfare and ideological domination.
Doc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast |
04 Sep 2007 10:54:11 PM |
|
|
On Sep 4, 8:07 pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1188956933.255407.315750@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 4, 6:24 pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
No, the 'douglass' that owns this great free site of nude celebs is not
our prudish Stevie! LOL! And, of course, Stevie will slither over to
the
site, if he's not been there many times already, secretly...and then
shake
his hypocritically moral finger at people like me for being honest.
As usual, you're making things up. Have I ever criticized you for
wanting to look at *adult* women? The answer is no. Knock yourself out.
Hmmmm....I've noticed that since the nude celeb topic surfaced, you've not
posted any more this evening, so far.
Spending a lot of time checking out the naked chicks?
You have a very strange imagination, Doc. What is it with you that you
think everyone else here must have a duplicate existence to yours? No
matter what you think, I don't just sit here and post away all night
long. I make a few posts and get up and take care of other
obligations. I've got real people in my life, complete with frequent
conversations ... we watch movies, or baseball games ... the phone
rings ... there are all sorts of reasons why I'm not always here to
respond immediately to your incessant posts. So don't always jump to
the conclusion that I must be doing what you would do. You'll be wrong
99.999% of the time.
"Adult women" by which nation's legal definition? Certainly, two-thirds of
the nations of the world have a different definition than America's.
Yes I know, but America is where we live. This is our society, and the
thought of a lecherous old man hitting on a young teenage girl is
creepy by our society's standards.
I think it's more appropriate, accurate to consider that "consensual" sex
between legally-aged partners not only is a rea
Legally aged in the US? No problem. But you've talked of your
attraction for underage girls, and you've questioned our age of
consent by citing other societies with lower age of consent. I wonder,
has anyone here (other than you) defended your sickening agenda?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Docrodile" |
|
| Title: Re: Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast |
05 Sep 2007 03:18:32 AM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1188964451.075258.142540@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 4, 8:07 pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1188956933.255407.315750@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 4, 6:24 pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
No, the 'douglass' that owns this great free site of nude celebs is
not
our prudish Stevie! LOL! And, of course, Stevie will slither over to
the
site, if he's not been there many times already, secretly...and then
shake
his hypocritically moral finger at people like me for being honest.
As usual, you're making things up. Have I ever criticized you for
wanting to look at *adult* women? The answer is no. Knock yourself
out.
Hmmmm....I've noticed that since the nude celeb topic surfaced, you've
not
posted any more this evening, so far.
Spending a lot of time checking out the naked chicks?
You have a very strange imagination, Doc.
At least I have one. And I don't give a ***** what you call strange since I
know you ARE strange, you hypocrite and fanatic. Let me illustrate. Read
on...
What is it with you that you
think everyone else here must have a duplicate existence to yours?
I'd ask you exactly the same. Is it that you think we should all judge
others by your standards, or is it the standards you've interpreted for
your convenience from selecting portions of the Bible to support your
wretched warfaring, fascistic frame of mind? You can take your twisted
concept of a sword-favoring Jesus and shove it. And since you love to
reinterpret or selectively choose biblical verses to support your
militaristic outlook on the purpose for humanity's existence -- to
dominate weaker nations by coercion and force and to proselytize your
fanatical political and pseudo-christian ideologies -- I think you want
the nations of the world to have 'a duplicate existence' to America's, in
every sense. You're the one that can't tolerate the diversity of human
existence and seeks to channel it down a narrow course of your choosing.
You can't tolerate many nations having a lower legal age limit for
consensual sex. Yet, these peoples aren't interested in what some
lawmakers have defined legal sex as being here. They're only interested in
their own laws...and when you said the UN has a 'mandate' for them to
follow, but they have violated it, you were speaking horseshit. You may
WANT a mandate, based on godly US moral parameters, and that could be the
reason you jumped the gun with that false statement. It is your desire to
see all of human conduct under the legal microscope, based partly on your
twisted interpretation of select biblical verses, and partly on your own
twisted goddamned judgement.
No
matter what you think, I don't just sit here and post away all night
long. I make a few posts and get up and take care of other
obligations. I've got real people in my life, complete with frequent
conversations ... we watch movies, or baseball games ... the phone
rings ... there are all sorts of reasons why I'm not always here to
respond immediately to your incessant posts. So don't always jump to
the conclusion that I must be doing what you would do. You'll be wrong
99.999% of the time.
Uh, I meant that as a sarcastic remark. I don't care if you're here or
not. I wish you weren't. I can see no rational reason for your continued
existence here. That is why you are patently a psychotic personality.
Psychos don't need rationality, except when its convenient to manipulate
people. If your 'other life' was as satisfying as pummeling people here
with your incessant archival cites, setting up a virtual, silly 'court
drama' where you play both the prosecutor and defendant, and being
habitually evasive, and tediously arguing every minute point to exhaustive
proportions...then...you'd be there in that fulfilling 'other life' and
out of here long ago. You're not foolin' me, psycho. Yourself, yes, maybe.
Me? No!
I know a psychotic lil' fucker when I see 'em and I've seen LOTS of you
over the years. As I said in a lone post about JTEM -- people like you are
like a goose that wakes up each morning in a new world. You reinvent
yourself. 'Forget your track record and apparently want us to forget it,
too, while you laughably remind us of our track record, for your spiteful
reasons.
"Adult women" by which nation's legal definition? Certainly, two-thirds
of
the nations of the world have a different definition than America's.
Yes I know, but America is where we live. This is our society, and the
thought of a lecherous old man hitting on a young teenage girl is
creepy by our society's standards.
OH! And so their not following America's 'legal, moral' standards makes
them morally wrong? Of course not. If you and other so-called christians
can reinterpret the bible, cherry pick verses, to support your own
favorite concept of what a good christian should be, or what Jesus was
like, then why can't people in those nations variously interpret what age
a girl should be to have legal sex? Your interpretations and opinions
about good christian conduct and biblical verse meanings serve you well,
as we can see, so why not apply the same reasoning to those peoples in
countries with lower legal-age sex limits? Seems perfectly rational to me,
Mr. I-Think-I'm-So-Rational. But, your position is quite irrational, and
that is yet another aspect of your psychotic personality, your fanaticism.
Fanaticism is psychosis, kid.
I think it's more appropriate, accurate to consider that "consensual"
sex
between legally-aged partners not only is a rea
Legally aged in the US? No problem. But you've talked of your
attraction for underage girls, and you've questioned our age of
consent by citing other societies with lower age of consent. I wonder,
has anyone here (other than you) defended your sickening agenda?
Why should tens of millions of residents in those *underage-sex limit*
nations have to defend themselves by a legal standard that America holds
in a minority position? Or why should they have to defend their sexual
morality when it is legally permitted to have sex under the age of 18? Or,
further, why should they have to defend themselves even to God when the
Bible draws no conclusions about the age limits of consensual sex, or the
parameters of sex between divergent age groups? So, I wonder, Stevie,
where is your rational thought? And what has mad you think that your
'sickening agenda' of overlaying your and America's restrictions on other
nations for consensual sex should be a universal standard? Irrationality?
Immaturity? Stupidity? Arrogance? Yes, all of those.
Doc
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast |
05 Sep 2007 02:53:44 AM |
|
|
On Sep 5, 4:54?am, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
I wonder,has anyone here (other than you) defended your sickening
agenda?
I haven't. But I will now.
Doc has never had a 'sickening agenda' on this issue. I like young
girls too. Mind, they have to be very pretty and slim.
I am not discussing children, but young girls. Pretty and rather nice
to look at.
Women have a habit of aging rather quickly once married. They no
longer seem to care about their 'charm', and so often metamorphose
into quite hideous looking things. That reminds me, How is your wife
these days Rev?
Anyway, why do you thing advertising agencies use young girls so
much...Why not use a big fat old woman?
All men rather like young girls.
I suppose that rules you out Stephanie.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast |
05 Sep 2007 03:17:22 AM |
|
|
"Werewolfy" <Werewolfy1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1188978824.134365.191920@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 4:54?am, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
I wonder,has anyone here (other than you) defended your sickening
agenda?
I haven't. But I will now.
This not my topic, but I defend Docs position also. Steven is a perverted
creep, no telling what skelentons are hiding in his closet. Much worse, I
bet! As we can all see, he is a pathetic creep with much to hide.
Doc has never had a 'sickening agenda' on this issue. I like young
girls too. Mind, they have to be very pretty and slim.
I am not discussing children, but young girls. Pretty and rather nice
to look at.
Women have a habit of aging rather quickly once married. They no
longer seem to care about their 'charm', and so often metamorphose
into quite hideous looking things. That reminds me, How is your wife
these days Rev?
Anyway, why do you thing advertising agencies use young girls so
much...Why not use a big fat old woman?
All men rather like young girls.
I suppose that rules you out Stephanie.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast |
05 Sep 2007 05:29:25 AM |
|
|
On Sep 5, 9:17?am, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
This not my topic, but I defend Docs position also. Steven is a perverted
creep, no telling what skelentons are hiding in his closet. Much worse, I
bet! As we can all see, he is a pathetic creep with much to hide.
I rather think you may well be right there Mondo. Stephanie loves
quotations, so I sugggest the old maxim of, "Methinks he doth protest
too much" is appropriate.
His evasive nature provokes concern as to his own hidden agenda.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast |
05 Sep 2007 08:08:06 AM |
|
|
On Sep 5, 3:29 am, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Sep 5, 9:17?am, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
This not my topic, but I defend Docs position also. Steven is a perverted
creep, no telling what skelentons are hiding in his closet. Much worse, I
bet! As we can all see, he is a pathetic creep with much to hide.
I rather think you may well be right there Mondo. Stephanie loves
quotations, so I sugggest the old maxim of, "Methinks he doth protest
too much" is appropriate.
His evasive nature provokes concern as to his own hidden agenda.
Interesting. I'm supposed to be impressed by three reclusive, anti-
social men who hide from the daylight, and who routinely throw around
death threats and can't get past their adolescent attraction for young
girls?
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast |
05 Sep 2007 08:31:45 AM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1188997686.248239.9720@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 3:29 am, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Sep 5, 9:17?am, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
This not my topic, but I defend Docs position also. Steven is a
perverted
creep, no telling what skelentons are hiding in his closet. Much worse,
I
bet! As we can all see, he is a pathetic creep with much to hide.
I rather think you may well be right there Mondo. Stephanie loves
quotations, so I sugggest the old maxim of, "Methinks he doth protest
too much" is appropriate.
His evasive nature provokes concern as to his own hidden agenda.
Interesting. I'm supposed to be impressed by three reclusive, anti-
social men who hide from the daylight, and who routinely throw around
death threats and can't get past their adolescent attraction for young
girls?
Who do you think is trying to 'impress' you Steven? Certainly not I! You
were the one who wants to make Muslim women 'submit' by going nude in
public. Remember? We won't talk about your 'attractions' here as it's
secretative individuals, like yourself, who usually end up loitering around
public toilets for young boys. Not so?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast |
05 Sep 2007 02:11:04 PM |
|
|
On Sep 5, 6:31 am, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1188997686.248239.9720@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 3:29 am, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Sep 5, 9:17?am, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
This not my topic, but I defend Docs position also. Steven is a
perverted
creep, no telling what skelentons are hiding in his closet. Much worse,
I
bet! As we can all see, he is a pathetic creep with much to hide.
I rather think you may well be right there Mondo. Stephanie loves
quotations, so I sugggest the old maxim of, "Methinks he doth protest
too much" is appropriate.
His evasive nature provokes concern as to his own hidden agenda.
Interesting. I'm supposed to be impressed by three reclusive, anti-
social men who hide from the daylight, and who routinely throw around
death threats and can't get past their adolescent attraction for young
girls?
Who do you think is trying to 'impress' you Steven? Certainly not I! You
were the one who wants to make Muslim women 'submit' by going nude in
public. Remember?
No, I don't remember. You must have been dreaming.
We won't talk about your 'attractions' here as it's
secretative individuals, like yourself, who usually end up loitering around
public toilets for young boys. Not so?
It's really a shame that the three of you have nothing better to do
than sit around and invent imaginative fiction about me. Go ahead and
believe whatever you want. The only effect it has is to confirm the
three of you as the angry, bitter, reclusive, people hating weirdos
that you are.
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast |
05 Sep 2007 02:39:14 PM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189019464.435631.224140@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 6:31 am, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1188997686.248239.9720@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 3:29 am, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Sep 5, 9:17?am, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
This not my topic, but I defend Docs position also. Steven is a
perverted
creep, no telling what skelentons are hiding in his closet. Much
worse,
I
bet! As we can all see, he is a pathetic creep with much to hide.
I rather think you may well be right there Mondo. Stephanie loves
quotations, so I sugggest the old maxim of, "Methinks he doth protest
too much" is appropriate.
His evasive nature provokes concern as to his own hidden agenda.
Interesting. I'm supposed to be impressed by three reclusive, anti-
social men who hide from the daylight, and who routinely throw around
death threats and can't get past their adolescent attraction for young
girls?
Who do you think is trying to 'impress' you Steven? Certainly not I! You
were the one who wants to make Muslim women 'submit' by going nude in
public. Remember?
No, I don't remember. You must have been dreaming.
We won't talk about your 'attractions' here as it's
secretative individuals, like yourself, who usually end up loitering
around
public toilets for young boys. Not so?
It's really a shame that the three of you have nothing better to do
than sit around and invent imaginative fiction about me. Go ahead and
believe whatever you want. The only effect it has is to confirm the
three of you as the angry, bitter, reclusive, people hating weirdos
that you are.
And hopefully one day I will get my wish!!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Docrodile" |
|
| Title: Re: Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast |
05 Sep 2007 03:05:59 PM |
|
|
"mukyuk" <ah@b.com> wrote in message
news:CBDDi.128675$fJ5.21418@pd7urf1no...
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189019464.435631.224140@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 6:31 am, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1188997686.248239.9720@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 3:29 am, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Sep 5, 9:17?am, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
This not my topic, but I defend Docs position also. Steven is a
perverted
creep, no telling what skelentons are hiding in his closet. Much
worse,
I
bet! As we can all see, he is a pathetic creep with much to hide.
I rather think you may well be right there Mondo. Stephanie loves
quotations, so I sugggest the old maxim of, "Methinks he doth
protest
too much" is appropriate.
His evasive nature provokes concern as to his own hidden agenda.
Interesting. I'm supposed to be impressed by three reclusive, anti-
social men who hide from the daylight, and who routinely throw
around
death threats and can't get past their adolescent attraction for
young
girls?
Who do you think is trying to 'impress' you Steven? Certainly not I!
You
were the one who wants to make Muslim women 'submit' by going nude in
public. Remember?
No, I don't remember. You must have been dreaming.
We won't talk about your 'attractions' here as it's
secretative individuals, like yourself, who usually end up loitering
around
public toilets for young boys. Not so?
It's really a shame that the three of you have nothing better to do
than sit around and invent imaginative fiction about me. Go ahead and
believe whatever you want. The only effect it has is to confirm the
three of you as the angry, bitter, reclusive, people hating weirdos
that you are.
And hopefully one day I will get my wish!!
In your case, we have plenty of good reasons to be angry and hate you. As
for bitterness in life, evasive, arrogant, tricky, hypocritical, fascistic
lil' assholes like yourself can lead to a certain degree of bitter
feelings. No one likes a person with his bloated head up his *****, telling
us repeatedly how stupid we are and how intellectually superior, even
morally superior, he is. Or how logical he is and illogical we are. Or
how, at this point, how sexually healthy and normal he is, and how
perverted we are. Or, how mentally healthy he is, and how disturbed we
are. And then have this same arrogant ***** complain, yes complain,
Stevie, COMPLAIN that he's getting mistreated here, but must continue on
because posters keep mentioning his name!!! ROFL !! A person who acts
like you do toward others, deserves the anger and the hate. And if we have
turned out to be reclusive, it's in large part due to fuckheads like
yourself who've made us want to spurn human contact. 'Even remotely over
this forum, your behaviour reinforces our behaviour to stay away from
making contact with people who add nothing beneficial to our lives.
Doc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast |
05 Sep 2007 03:25:11 PM |
|
|
On Sep 5, 1:05 pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote in message
news:CBDDi.128675$fJ5.21418@pd7urf1no...
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189019464.435631.224140@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 6:31 am, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1188997686.248239.9720@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 3:29 am, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Sep 5, 9:17?am, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
This not my topic, but I defend Docs position also. Steven is a
perverted
creep, no telling what skelentons are hiding in his closet. Much
worse,
I
bet! As we can all see, he is a pathetic creep with much to hide.
I rather think you may well be right there Mondo. Stephanie loves
quotations, so I sugggest the old maxim of, "Methinks he doth
protest
too much" is appropriate.
His evasive nature provokes concern as to his own hidden agenda.
Interesting. I'm supposed to be impressed by three reclusive, anti-
social men who hide from the daylight, and who routinely throw
around
death threats and can't get past their adolescent attraction for
young
girls?
Who do you think is trying to 'impress' you Steven? Certainly not I!
You
were the one who wants to make Muslim women 'submit' by going nude in
public. Remember?
No, I don't remember. You must have been dreaming.
We won't talk about your 'attractions' here as it's
secretative individuals, like yourself, who usually end up loitering
around
public toilets for young boys. Not so?
It's really a shame that the three of you have nothing better to do
than sit around and invent imaginative fiction about me. Go ahead and
believe whatever you want. The only effect it has is to confirm the
three of you as the angry, bitter, reclusive, people hating weirdos
that you are.
And hopefully one day I will get my wish!!
In your case, we have plenty of good reasons to be angry and hate you. As
for bitterness in life, evasive, arrogant, tricky, hypocritical, fascistic
lil' assholes like yourself can lead to a certain degree of bitter
feelings. No one likes a person with his bloated head up his *****, telling
us repeatedly how stupid we are and how intellectually superior, even
morally superior, he is. Or how logical he is and illogical we are. Or
how, at this point, how sexually healthy and normal he is, and how
perverted we are.
It was you who originally brought up the subject of "adults" and
"kids" having sexual relationships -- relationships of which you
approve. I made no false accusation about you.
Or, how mentally healthy he is, and how disturbed we are.
I've never mentioned my mental health. All I've done is ask you why
you feel the need to project your own foibles onto others here (not
just me). It was you who has repeatedly mentioned your own mental
health problems. I take no joy in your situation, but only question
your seeming need to project it onto me.
And then have this same arrogant ***** complain, yes complain,
Stevie, COMPLAIN that he's getting mistreated here, but must continue on
because posters keep mentioning his name!!!
You still can't quite get it right, can you Docko? It's not that I
"must" continue on. It's that I *choose* to continue on. I never said
I wanted to leave. It was you who begged and pleaded with me to leave,
and now you've apparently projected your desire for me to leave onto
me supposedly wanting to leave. I'm literally shaking my head at your
illogic.
<snip, remainder unread before I get a headache>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Docrodile" |
|
| Title: Re: Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast |
05 Sep 2007 04:01:09 PM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189023911.734352.206410@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 1:05 pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote in message
news:CBDDi.128675$fJ5.21418@pd7urf1no...
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189019464.435631.224140@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 6:31 am, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1188997686.248239.9720@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 3:29 am, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Sep 5, 9:17?am, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
This not my topic, but I defend Docs position also. Steven is
a
perverted
creep, no telling what skelentons are hiding in his closet.
Much
worse,
I
bet! As we can all see, he is a pathetic creep with much to
hide.
I rather think you may well be right there Mondo. Stephanie
loves
quotations, so I sugggest the old maxim of, "Methinks he doth
protest
too much" is appropriate.
His evasive nature provokes concern as to his own hidden agenda.
Interesting. I'm supposed to be impressed by three reclusive,
anti-
social men who hide from the daylight, and who routinely throw
around
death threats and can't get past their adolescent attraction for
young
girls?
Who do you think is trying to 'impress' you Steven? Certainly not
I!
You
were the one who wants to make Muslim women 'submit' by going nude
in
public. Remember?
No, I don't remember. You must have been dreaming.
We won't talk about your 'attractions' here as it's
secretative individuals, like yourself, who usually end up
loitering
around
public toilets for young boys. Not so?
It's really a shame that the three of you have nothing better to do
than sit around and invent imaginative fiction about me. Go ahead
and
believe whatever you want. The only effect it has is to confirm the
three of you as the angry, bitter, reclusive, people hating weirdos
that you are.
And hopefully one day I will get my wish!!
In your case, we have plenty of good reasons to be angry and hate you.
As
for bitterness in life, evasive, arrogant, tricky, hypocritical,
fascistic
lil' assholes like yourself can lead to a certain degree of bitter
feelings. No one likes a person with his bloated head up his *****,
telling
us repeatedly how stupid we are and how intellectually superior, even
morally superior, he is. Or how logical he is and illogical we are. Or
how, at this point, how sexually healthy and normal he is, and how
perverted we are.
It was you who originally brought up the subject of "adults" and
"kids" having sexual relationships -- relationships of which you
approve. I made no false accusation about you.
Oh! Here we go with you attemping, once again, to pass blame. Your
prurient interest in this subject wasn't something I forced on you, was
it? Well, *****, was it? No, you've been pursuing me on the same subject
of sexual relations beween divergent age groups ever since I first brough
it up months ago. Each and every damned time, you are engaging in long
threads every statement I make on the subject. If it bothers you so, as
you project, why continue to engage me? Jeez...man, it's about time you
faced up to how phony and plastic you are as a personality hell bent on
avoiding uncomfortable truths about himself, while providing one
distraction after another to cleanse yourself of your prurient interest in
the subject. I don't care a rat's ***** about your 'accusations', since your
implications are clear as daylight. You continue to use posters like
shitrags to elevate yourself morally and ideologically and...now...even
sexually, socially. I think your bloated head up your ***** has become so
enlarged that it now appears you're 9 months into pregnancy.
How's it look inside there, Stevie?...does it remind you of your fetal
days, wishing you could've clumb back up your mother's birth canal and
never have come out into this "vile" world? ROFL! Well, we wish you'd
never arrived, that's for sure.
Doc
Or, how mentally healthy he is, and how disturbed we are.
I've never mentioned my mental health. All I've done is ask you why
you feel the need to project your own foibles onto others here (not
just me). It was you who has repeatedly mentioned your own mental
health problems. I take no joy in your situation, but only question
your seeming need to project it onto me.
Why do you think we need to project onto you what you already are? LOL!
And then have this same arrogant ***** complain, yes complain,
Stevie, COMPLAIN that he's getting mistreated here, but must continue
on
because posters keep mentioning his name!!!
You still can't quite get it right, can you Docko? It's not that I
"must" continue on. It's that I *choose* to continue on. I never said
I wanted to leave. It was you who begged and pleaded with me to leave,
and now you've apparently projected your desire for me to leave onto
me supposedly wanting to leave. I'm literally shaking my head at your
illogic.
<snip, remainder unread before I get a headache>
Enjoying your bologna sandwich and big dill pickle for lunch today, Stevie
boy? Watch out for that big pretzel snack....
Doc :))~
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast |
05 Sep 2007 04:19:37 PM |
|
|
On Sep 5, 2:01 pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189023911.734352.206410@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 1:05 pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote in message
news:CBDDi.128675$fJ5.21418@pd7urf1no...
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189019464.435631.224140@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 6:31 am, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1188997686.248239.9720@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 3:29 am, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Sep 5, 9:17?am, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
This not my topic, but I defend Docs position also. Steven is
a
perverted
creep, no telling what skelentons are hiding in his closet.
Much
worse,
I
bet! As we can all see, he is a pathetic creep with much to
hide.
I rather think you may well be right there Mondo. Stephanie
loves
quotations, so I sugggest the old maxim of, "Methinks he doth
protest
too much" is appropriate.
His evasive nature provokes concern as to his own hidden agenda.
Interesting. I'm supposed to be impressed by three reclusive,
anti-
social men who hide from the daylight, and who routinely throw
around
death threats and can't get past their adolescent attraction for
young
girls?
Who do you think is trying to 'impress' you Steven? Certainly not
I!
You
were the one who wants to make Muslim women 'submit' by going nude
in
public. Remember?
No, I don't remember. You must have been dreaming.
We won't talk about your 'attractions' here as it's
secretative individuals, like yourself, who usually end up
loitering
around
public toilets for young boys. Not so?
It's really a shame that the three of you have nothing better to do
than sit around and invent imaginative fiction about me. Go ahead
and
believe whatever you want. The only effect it has is to confirm the
three of you as the angry, bitter, reclusive, people hating weirdos
that you are.
And hopefully one day I will get my wish!!
In your case, we have plenty of good reasons to be angry and hate you.
As
for bitterness in life, evasive, arrogant, tricky, hypocritical,
fascistic
lil' assholes like yourself can lead to a certain degree of bitter
feelings. No one likes a person with his bloated head up his *****,
telling
us repeatedly how stupid we are and how intellectually superior, even
morally superior, he is. Or how logical he is and illogical we are. Or
how, at this point, how sexually healthy and normal he is, and how
perverted we are.
It was you who originally brought up the subject of "adults" and
"kids" having sexual relationships -- relationships of which you
approve. I made no false accusation about you.
Oh! Here we go with you attemping, once again, to pass blame. Your
prurient interest in this subject wasn't something I forced on you, was
it?
Pass blame? That's what you're doing, Docko. You've got the prurient
interest, but you're thrashing around trying to point a finger at me
when you've got nothing but that extraordinarily active imagination of
yours ... thrashing around because you want to believe I'm just like
you ... is all this projection part of your illness?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Docrodile" |
|
| Title: Re: Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast |
05 Sep 2007 05:01:39 PM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189027177.159697.22680@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 2:01 pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189023911.734352.206410@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 1:05 pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote in message
news:CBDDi.128675$fJ5.21418@pd7urf1no...
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189019464.435631.224140@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 6:31 am, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1188997686.248239.9720@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 3:29 am, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Sep 5, 9:17?am, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
This not my topic, but I defend Docs position also. Steven
is
a
perverted
creep, no telling what skelentons are hiding in his closet.
Much
worse,
I
bet! As we can all see, he is a pathetic creep with much to
hide.
I rather think you may well be right there Mondo. Stephanie
loves
quotations, so I sugggest the old maxim of, "Methinks he doth
protest
too much" is appropriate.
His evasive nature provokes concern as to his own hidden
agenda.
Interesting. I'm supposed to be impressed by three reclusive,
anti-
social men who hide from the daylight, and who routinely throw
around
death threats and can't get past their adolescent attraction
for
young
girls?
Who do you think is trying to 'impress' you Steven? Certainly
not
I!
You
were the one who wants to make Muslim women 'submit' by going
nude
in
public. Remember?
No, I don't remember. You must have been dreaming.
We won't talk about your 'attractions' here as it's
secretative individuals, like yourself, who usually end up
loitering
around
public toilets for young boys. Not so?
It's really a shame that the three of you have nothing better to
do
than sit around and invent imaginative fiction about me. Go ahead
and
believe whatever you want. The only effect it has is to confirm
the
three of you as the angry, bitter, reclusive, people hating
weirdos
that you are.
And hopefully one day I will get my wish!!
In your case, we have plenty of good reasons to be angry and hate
you.
As
for bitterness in life, evasive, arrogant, tricky, hypocritical,
fascistic
lil' assholes like yourself can lead to a certain degree of bitter
feelings. No one likes a person with his bloated head up his *****,
telling
us repeatedly how stupid we are and how intellectually superior,
even
morally superior, he is. Or how logical he is and illogical we are.
Or
how, at this point, how sexually healthy and normal he is, and how
perverted we are.
It was you who originally brought up the subject of "adults" and
"kids" having sexual relationships -- relationships of which you
approve. I made no false accusation about you.
Oh! Here we go with you attemping, once again, to pass blame. Your
prurient interest in this subject wasn't something I forced on you, was
it?
Pass blame? That's what you're doing, Docko. You've got the prurient
interest, but you're thrashing around trying to point a finger at me
when you've got nothing but that extraordinarily active imagination of
yours ... thrashing around because you want to believe I'm just like
you ... is all this projection part of your illness?
No, I've got the honesty and openness to bring up a taboo subject that
closeted people like you spin their 'prurient interest' off of. Prurient
interest is something you obviously are as confused in defining as
'mandate' -- it is defined as shameful and morbid interest in nudity,
sex, or excretion. The key word here, that applies to your responses to
me, is 'shameful'. You have shame about sex. I don't. If I were you, I'd
save my shame for your continued support of unnecessary bombing of
innocents in Iraq. Your 'morbid interest' should be confined to that
subject. Do you know how many young people Bush destroyed in Iraq whose
sexual being was splattered all over the landscape? They'll never know a
wife, like you have, to cozy up to, or look at a picture of a naked girl,
or think a wet dream, fall in love, have sex...no, self-righteous folks
like yourself supported massive destruction of their budding lives. All
for your sickening ideology of righteousness, and your inability to face
the sickness of your mind. So, when you snuggle up to the Mrs. tonight,
think how many have worms and maggots snuggling up to them beneath the
killing fields fanatics like you supported so fervently.
If sex discussions interest you but ironically disturb you, then continue
to focus on the love of your life -- glorified war and 'liberating'
militarism. You'd do well to leave what makes you feel shame and
embarassment totally alone. It makes you look even sillier,sicker than you
usually look here.
Doc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast |
05 Sep 2007 07:59:51 PM |
|
|
On Sep 5, 3:01 pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189027177.159697.22680@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 2:01 pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189023911.734352.206410@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
It was you who originally brought up the subject of "adults" and
"kids" having sexual relationships -- relationships of which you
approve. I made no false accusation about you.
Oh! Here we go with you attemping, once again, to pass blame. Your
prurient interest in this subject wasn't something I forced on you, was
it?
Pass blame? That's what you're doing, Docko. You've got the prurient
interest, but you're thrashing around trying to point a finger at me
when you've got nothing but that extraordinarily active imagination of
yours ... thrashing around because you want to believe I'm just like
you ... is all this projection part of your illness?
No, I've got the honesty and openness to bring up a taboo subject that
closeted people like you spin their 'prurient interest' off of. Prurient
interest is something you obviously are as confused in defining as
'mandate' -- it is defined as shameful and morbid interest in nudity,
sex, or excretion. The key word here, that applies to your responses to
me, is 'shameful'.
That's right, your prurient interest in "adult" and "kid" sexual
interactions is nothing less than shameful. Thanks for acknowledging
that point.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Docrodile" |
|
| Title: Re: Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast |
05 Sep 2007 08:28:16 PM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189040391.052794.321370@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 3:01 pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189027177.159697.22680@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 2:01 pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189023911.734352.206410@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
It was you who originally brought up the subject of "adults" and
"kids" having sexual relationships -- relationships of which you
approve. I made no false accusation about you.
Oh! Here we go with you attemping, once again, to pass blame. Your
prurient interest in this subject wasn't something I forced on you,
was
it?
Pass blame? That's what you're doing, Docko. You've got the prurient
interest, but you're thrashing around trying to point a finger at me
when you've got nothing but that extraordinarily active imagination
of
yours ... thrashing around because you want to believe I'm just like
you ... is all this projection part of your illness?
No, I've got the honesty and openness to bring up a taboo subject that
closeted people like you spin their 'prurient interest' off of.
Prurient
interest is something you obviously are as confused in defining as
'mandate' -- it is defined as shameful and morbid interest in nudity,
sex, or excretion. The key word here, that applies to your responses to
me, is 'shameful'.
That's right, your prurient interest in "adult" and "kid" sexual
interactions is nothing less than shameful. Thanks for acknowledging
that point.
The only thing I've acknowledged is your weaselly attitude and devious
nature here. If you hadn't noticed, the post is directed at you, not at
myself. Are you delusional or just laugably trying for another ill-fated
Stevie 'zinger'?? I'll leave the blame game where it belongs -- to the
immature psychotics who can't face their own sour music, but prefer to
whistle a spiteful tune about others.
Keep whistlin', kid...one day your forked tongue will fail you.
Doc
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast |
05 Sep 2007 10:26:32 PM |
|
|
On Sep 5, 6:28 pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189040391.052794.321370@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 3:01 pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189027177.159697.22680@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 2:01 pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189023911.734352.206410@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
It was you who originally brought up the subject of "adults" and
"kids" having sexual relationships -- relationships of which you
approve. I made no false accusation about you.
Oh! Here we go with you attemping, once again, to pass blame. Your
prurient interest in this subject wasn't something I forced on you,
was
it?
Pass blame? That's what you're doing, Docko. You've got the prurient
interest, but you're thrashing around trying to point a finger at me
when you've got nothing but that extraordinarily active imagination
of yours ... thrashing around because you want to believe I'm just
like you ... is all this projection part of your illness?
No, I've got the honesty and openness to bring up a taboo subject that
closeted people like you spin their 'prurient interest' off of.
Prurient
interest is something you obviously are as confused in defining as
'mandate' -- it is defined as shameful and morbid interest in nudity,
sex, or excretion. The key word here, that applies to your responses to
me, is 'shameful'.
That's right, your prurient interest in "adult" and "kid" sexual
interactions is nothing less than shameful. Thanks for acknowledging
that point.
The only thing I've acknowledged is your weaselly attitude and devious
nature here. If you hadn't noticed, the post is directed at you, not at
myself.
So what? My post was directed at yourself, and it was accurate.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast |
05 Sep 2007 10:11:51 PM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189023911.734352.206410@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 1:05 pm, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote in message
news:CBDDi.128675$fJ5.21418@pd7urf1no...
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1189019464.435631.224140@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 6:31 am, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1188997686.248239.9720@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 3:29 am, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Sep 5, 9:17?am, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
This not my topic, but I defend Docs position also. Steven is a
perverted
creep, no telling what skelentons are hiding in his closet. Much
worse,
I
bet! As we can all see, he is a pathetic creep with much to
hide.
I rather think you may well be right there Mondo. Stephanie loves
quotations, so I sugggest the old maxim of, "Methinks he doth
protest
too much" is appropriate.
His evasive nature provokes concern as to his own hidden agenda.
Interesting. I'm supposed to be impressed by three reclusive, anti-
social men who hide from the daylight, and who routinely throw
around
death threats and can't get past their adolescent attraction for
young
girls?
Who do you think is trying to 'impress' you Steven? Certainly not I!
You
were the one who wants to make Muslim women 'submit' by going nude in
public. Remember?
No, I don't remember. You must have been dreaming.
We won't talk about your 'attractions' here as it's
secretative individuals, like yourself, who usually end up loitering
around
public toilets for young boys. Not so?
It's really a shame that the three of you have nothing better to do
than sit around and invent imaginative fiction about me. Go ahead and
believe whatever you want. The only effect it has is to confirm the
three of you as the angry, bitter, reclusive, people hating weirdos
that you are.
And hopefully one day I will get my wish!!
In your case, we have plenty of good reasons to be angry and hate you. As
for bitterness in life, evasive, arrogant, tricky, hypocritical,
fascistic
lil' assholes like yourself can lead to a certain degree of bitter
feelings. No one likes a person with his bloated head up his *****, telling
us repeatedly how stupid we are and how intellectually superior, even
morally superior, he is. Or how logical he is and illogical we are. Or
how, at this point, how sexually healthy and normal he is, and how
perverted we are.
It was you who originally brought up the subject of "adults" and
"kids" having sexual relationships -- relationships of which you
approve. I made no false accusation about you.
Or, how mentally healthy he is, and how disturbed we are.
I've never mentioned my mental health. All I've done is ask you why
you feel the need to project your own foibles onto others here (not
just me). It was you who has repeatedly mentioned your own mental
health problems. I take no joy in your situation, but only question
your seeming need to project it onto me.
And then have this same arrogant ***** complain, yes complain,
Stevie, COMPLAIN that he's getting mistreated here, but must continue on
because posters keep mentioning his name!!!
You still can't quite get it right, can you Docko? It's not that I
"must" continue on. It's that I *choose* to continue on. I never said
I wanted to leave. It was you who begged and pleaded with me to leave,
and now you've apparently projected your desire for me to leave onto
me supposedly wanting to leave. I'm literally shaking my head at your
illogic.
I hope you 'shake your head' so hard that your neck breaks!!!
<snip, remainder unread before I get a headache>
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast |
05 Sep 2007 08:34:21 AM |
|
|
On Sep 5, 2:08?pm, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
Interesting. I'm supposed to be impressed by three reclusive, anti-
social men who hide from the daylight, and who routinely throw around
death threats and can't get past their adolescent attraction for young
girls?
Well, Mondo doesn't find young girls attractive, old ones either. He's
also quite incredibly open about his thoughts and feelings. He
expresses his own doubts and hopes very well. I find that a very
positive and agreeable trait in a person.
Doc doesn't threaten anyone with harm. Your generalisation falls to
the ground rather heavily.
If you must, I mean really must find a common link that unites the
three of us, then that link is intelligence. I will risk the scorn of
those who believe my words to be egotistical, and repeat, the link is
intelligence. A well above average understanding of matters, of self-
examination, of questioning and of reasoning.
You simply don't have the ability to become D'Artagnan and join us.
You probably don't even realise the meaning of that which I have just
written.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast |
05 Sep 2007 08:06:34 AM |
|
|
On Sep 5, 12:53 am, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Sep 5, 4:54?am, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
I wonder,has anyone here (other than you) defended your sickening
agenda?
I haven't. But I will now.
Doc has never had a 'sickening agenda' on this issue.
Yes he has, and yes you have defended it in the past. Here's what Doc
has said about this issue: "It seems that adults and kids occasionally
get together and have intimate relations for awhile, for their mutual
benefit, and enjoy each other's company." Doc does not have a problem
with that statement, which is why he made it. He's made it clear he'd
like to see our society normalize sexual relations between "adults and
kids" ....
I like young
girls too. Mind, they have to be very pretty and slim.
I am not discussing children, but young girls. Pretty and rather nice
to look at.
Women have a habit of aging rather quickly once married. They no
longer seem to care about their 'charm', and so often metamorphose
into quite hideous looking things. That reminds me, How is your wife
these days Rev?
She's beautiful. I'm not sure what you expected me to say, but I live
in an area where the vast majority of people take care of themselves.
I'm at the age where I enjoy mature women. But I do realize there are
adult men who can't get past their adolescent mentality, and find
themselves attracted to underage girls. The only problem I'd have with
those kinds of men is if they *act* on their adolescent impulses.
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast |
05 Sep 2007 08:47:53 AM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1188997594.126889.142020@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 12:53 am, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Sep 5, 4:54?am, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
I wonder,has anyone here (other than you) defended your sickening
agenda?
I haven't. But I will now.
Doc has never had a 'sickening agenda' on this issue.
Yes he has, and yes you have defended it in the past. Here's what Doc
has said about this issue: "It seems that adults and kids occasionally
get together and have intimate relations for awhile, for their mutual
benefit, and enjoy each other's company." Doc does not have a problem
with that statement, which is why he made it. He's made it clear he'd
like to see our society normalize sexual relations between "adults and
kids" ....
I like young
girls too. Mind, they have to be very pretty and slim.
I am not discussing children, but young girls. Pretty and rather nice
to look at.
Women have a habit of aging rather quickly once married. They no
longer seem to care about their 'charm', and so often metamorphose
into quite hideous looking things. That reminds me, How is your wife
these days Rev?
She's beautiful. I'm not sure what you expected me to say, but I live
in an area where the vast majority of people take care of themselves.
I'm at the age where I enjoy mature women. But I do realize there are
adult men who can't get past their adolescent mentality, and find
themselves attracted to underage girls. The only problem I'd have with
those kinds of men is if they *act* on their adolescent impulses.
If you have difficulty with simple things like 'getting past' APN Steven,
how can you resist young attractive women? I have my theories, but care to
explain?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Docrodile" |
|
| Title: Re: Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast |
05 Sep 2007 10:16:54 AM |
|
|
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1188997594.126889.142020@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 12:53 am, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Sep 5, 4:54?am, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
I wonder,has anyone here (other than you) defended your sickening
agenda?
I haven't. But I will now.
Doc has never had a 'sickening agenda' on this issue.
Yes he has, and yes you have defended it in the past. Here's what Doc
has said about this issue: "It seems that adults and kids occasionally
get together and have intimate relations for awhile, for their mutual
benefit, and enjoy each other's company." Doc does not have a problem
with that statement, which is why he made it. He's made it clear he'd
like to see our society normalize sexual relations between "adults and
kids" ....
I was making an observation on reality, Stevie. There is no doubt that
people of widely divergent age groups are sexually attracted to one
another, and engage in various stages of intimacy. And there is no doubt
that some percentage also fall in love. Mary Kay LeTorneau, of Seattle,
was, as you should know (since it was a cause celebre for protestors
against 'pedophilia'), an elementary school teacher who had sexual
intercourse with a 12 year old boy. The sex continued as he turned 13,
then in middle school. The boy and Mary are now married and have two
children, after she served 7 years in prison (partly for violation of
parole for again having sex with the boy). They obviously weren't lying to
the court that they loved each other and that the sex was an expression of
their love.
All over the real world, Stevie, human beings are attracted to each other
in widely divergent age groups. Some of them are merely sexually
attracted, while others fall in love. It is no different with the usual
adult interrelationships you apparently approve so much of, legally
permitted by the US goverment.
Now, as usual, you miss the greater point, but wish to focus on the
sensational to support your prudishness and adherence to the holy word of
contemporary US law.
That greater point being that, as I've clearly stated repeatedly, and
you've deliberately avoided responding to, is that human sexual relations
are what they are, and have always been that way. No matter how any person
or group wishes to restrict them, to box 'em up, punish, or characterize
them as moral or immoral, the species continues its millenia-old
interrelationships of greatly diverse physical intimacy and emotional
bonding.
It is NOT what ol' Doc wishes or not wishes, or what fascistic Stevie
approves of or not, or anyone else thinks on this matter, it is the hard
reality of the physical and emotional magnetism between people -- of all
colors, ages, sexual persuasions, classes, religions, et al -- that
supersedes all attempts, legal or otherwise, to neatly package them into
socially, legally, morally, politically acceptable forms.
It used to be that ultraconservatives like yourself tried to keep
different racial groups apart, causing them great suffering for the cause
of your 'morality', and social appropriateness. As it turned out, as we
all know, that such intimate or friendly interrelationships flourished
after liberals helped lead the civil rights movement in the US...tossing
away the restrictions, the mean-spirited punishments. You wouldn't have
been there in the streets rallying for such liberation of the human
spirit, Stevie...no, you'd been inside your lil' house writing indignant
snail mails of protest to conservative congressmen. You would've been
telling anyone who sympathized how immoral and threatening crossing the
barriers of color were, how 'communistic' and 'unAmerican' it all was.
You almost always miss the 'cosmology' of human dynamics, kid. It shows
your lack of understanding, your lack of compassion...and reflects your
constant efforts to make this species into something that conveniently,
safely, approvingly meets your own bottled-up personal standards and fits
into the restrictive parameters of your ideology.
What you attempt to do is as laughably futile as trying to reorder the
workings of physics of our universe for your entertainment or
satisfaction. You are clearly unable to comprehend anything larger than
what is in front of your nose at the moment. This group is your basket
weaving exercise, kid, as you tediously sit there, like an old woman,
carefully interlocking the threads, admiring each weave completed, and
content it is a most perfect basket...the most perfect of all.
You poor lost ol' miserable hag.
Doc :))~
I like young
girls too. Mind, they have to be very pretty and slim.
I am not discussing children, but young girls. Pretty and rather nice
to look at.
Women have a habit of aging rather quickly once married. They no
longer seem to care about their 'charm', and so often metamorphose
into quite hideous looking things. That reminds me, How is your wife
these days Rev?
She's beautiful. I'm not sure what you expected me to say, but I live
in an area where the vast majority of people take care of themselves.
I'm at the age where I enjoy mature women. But I do realize there are
adult men who can't get past their adolescent mentality, and find
themselves attracted to underage girls. The only problem I'd have with
those kinds of men is if they *act* on their adolescent impulses.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Douglas" |
|
| Title: Re: Strange Sights Reported Over East Coast |
05 Sep 2007 02:12:37 PM |
|
|
On Sep 5, 8:16 am, "Docrodile" <swampth...@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"Steven Douglas" <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote in message
news:1188997594.126889.142020@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 5, 12:53 am, Werewolfy <Werewol...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Sep 5, 4:54?am, Steven Douglas <dste...@flashmail.com> wrote:
I wonder,has anyone here (other than you) defended your sickening
agenda?
I haven't. But I will now.
< | | | | | | | | | |