DDB wrote:
<grub@internet.charitydays.co.uk> wrote in message
news:o2cmvv0sfjk3lg6j60q1589fue98ptvtvb@4ax.com...
sufficient intelligence to have prevented 9/11
______________________________________________________________________
Here's another one of those questions that opinion polls never ask.
Which statement do you believe to be nearest the truth ?
Remember, the question is asking what you believe is NEAREST the truth.
[a]
There was sufficient intelligence to have prevented 9/11.
I agree Clinton had Seven years worth of information about Osama and he did
nothing, nothing when Osama bombed the wordl trade the first time in 1993,
nothing when he bombed the embasies in Africa, and nothing when he bombed
the USS COLE. It is well documented that he had opportunities to have Osama
handed over to him 3 times and fail to accept. Theis plenty of intellegence
to indicate that Clinton didn't do his, now you want us to beleive he
actually tok time to do his job after he didn't for 7 years?
Puuuulllleeeeaassseee
You can't prove any of this, because it's all kindergarten-level lies.
.
