The "Clinton-v-Bush" score so far
_______________________________________
1 semen stained dress from Clinton.
1000 blood stained uniforms from Bush.
_______________________________________
.
|
|
| User: "razzor3k" |
|
| Title: Re: The "Clinton-v-Bush" score so far |
09 Aug 2004 04:59:31 PM |
|
|
<grub@internet.charitydays.uk.co> wrote in message
news:m8idh0dpg301rkbnl4r6d6cbamva0klani@4ax.com...
The "Clinton-v-Bush" score so far
_______________________________________
1 semen stained dress from Clinton.
1000 blood stained uniforms from Bush.
Ah but ask yourself how many blood stained uniforms Clinton produced.
.
|
|
|
| User: "ALA" |
|
| Title: Re: The "Clinton-v-Bush" score so far |
09 Aug 2004 05:17:32 PM |
|
|
razzor3k <razzor3k@cox.net> wrote in message
news:jtSRc.16814$ih.9616@fed1read07...
<grub@internet.charitydays.uk.co> wrote in message
news:m8idh0dpg301rkbnl4r6d6cbamva0klani@4ax.com...
The "Clinton-v-Bush" score so far
_______________________________________
1 semen stained dress from Clinton.
1000 blood stained uniforms from Bush.
and 25 million iraqis freed from tyranny
hth
whit
Ah but ask yourself how many blood stained uniforms Clinton produced.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Never anonymous Bud" |
|
| Title: Re: The "Clinton-v-Bush" score so far |
09 Aug 2004 08:00:26 PM |
|
|
Having escaped, in tact, from the Democratic Convention, "ALA" <ala@home.net> inked:
and 25 million iraqis freed from tyranny
And sold into slavery.
--
To reply by email, remove the XYZ.
Lumber Cartel (tinlc) #2063. Spam this account at your own risk.
This sig censored by the Office of Home and Land Insecurity....
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: The "Clinton-v-Bush" score so far |
09 Aug 2004 05:09:45 PM |
|
|
wrote in message news:<m8idh0dpg301rkbnl4r6d6cbamva0klani@4ax.com>...
The "Clinton-v-Bush" score so far
_______________________________________
1 semen stained dress from Clinton.
1000 blood stained uniforms from Bush.
Ahh a bit more clarity here is needed ;)
Bush defender of the western civilization.
Clinton the nuclear weapons WMD proliferation person.
http://prophet.michaelreport.com/nostradamus/index.html
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Marxist Moore" |
|
| Title: JFK Was No Left-Wing Liberal idiot like todays liberal idiots are. |
08 Aug 2004 08:58:18 PM |
|
|
JFK Was No Left-Wing Liberal idiot like todays liberal idiots are.
Phil Brennan
Friday Nov. 21, 2003
Democrats continue to cite the late President John F. Kennedy as being
an example of their kind of liberal - a man who would have approved of
the far-left policies and programs of today’s Democratic party. That’s
sheer nonsense. The record shows that JFK was neither their kind of
liberal nor an advocate of the socialist policies today's liberals
embrace, nor of their so-called "progressive" policies which place
them on the left of the political spectrum, nearly out there with Marx
and Lenin.
John F. Kennedy bore little resemblance to his brother Teddy Kennedy,
the U.S. Senate’s paragon of liberalism, which is so at odds with
JFK’s oft-demonstrated conservative views.
JFK would have been horrified to hear his fellow Democrats attacking
the Commander in Chief, for example, while the nation was at war and
American service men and women were dying on foreign soil.
John F. Kennedy was above all, a fierce patriot, a war hero who would
have been infuriated had he heard that Bill Clinton had once
proclaimed that he loathed the military, or had he seen how Clinton
emasculated the Armed Forces.
Unlike the draft-dodging Clinton, JFK put himself in harm’s way and
almost died in the Pacific when, with his father’s enormous political
influence, he could have sat out the war in some cushy job in
Washington.
Instead he chose to volunteer for one of the most hazardous
assignments in the Navy - commanding a small, flimsy, plywood PT Boat.
And when that boat was sunk by a Japanese destroyer, he risked his
life to save the lives of his crew members despite his crippling
injuries.
Those who invoke his memory while at the same time undermining the war
against terrorism forget that this was a president who:
a.. Backed Cuban exiles in their attempt to oust the Castro regime
which, then as now, sought to use terrorist tactics to overthrow
anti-Communist governments in Latin America and install Soviet style
regimes south of our border.
a.. Faced down the Soviets when they brazenly installed missiles aimed
at the U.S. in Cuba and forced them to withdraw their ICBMs from the
island 90 miles from the U.S.
a.. Sent U.S. troops into South Viet Nam in an attempt to quash the
Soviet and North Vietnam-backed Viet Cong. Those present-day liberal
Democrats who castigate President Bush for seeking to advance
democracy in the Middle East no matter what the cost to America in
lives and treasure should recall JFK’s pledge in his Inaugural address
" ... we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship,
support any friend, oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival
and the success of liberty."
If you listen to the 10 men vying for the 2004 Democrat presidential
nomination, what you hear is the exact opposite - none of them would
think of making such promises today, being utterly unwilling to pay
"any price,” in Iraq or the rest of the Middle East. Cut and run is
closer to their hearts.
On November 22 we observe the 40th anniversary of JFK’s assassination
and we do violence to his memory by linking him to the leftwing cabal
which is today’s Democrat party.
Instead we should look for the real John F. Kennedy and when we
discover him we’ll see that he would be sickened to see what has
happened to his party since his death in November 1963. Make no
mistake about it; JFK was in many ways a failure as president, but his
failures were not due to his natural conservative views but because he
sought to appease his party’s dominant liberal wing, which he needed
to have behind him when he ran for re-election.
The failure of the Bay of Pigs invasion of Castro’s Cuba, for example,
was more due to the failure of the will of men like his U.N.
ambassador Adlai Stevenson, who bitterly opposed the U.S. support of
the Cuban exiles seeking to overthrow Castro.
When push came to shove during the invasion and U.S. air power was
needed to save the exile invaders, he listened to Stevenson’s advice
knowing that if he didn’t he would have infuriated the left wing of
his party and risked losing their wholehearted support in 1964. But he
also had his successes, especially in facing down the tax and spend
liberals in his party bitterly opposed to his tax cutting policies
which were anathema to the majority of his fellow Democrats.
As Dr. Roderick Beaman has written in an etherzone.com column,
although John Kennedy "has been elevated to icon status in the liberal
world," he was instinctively, "one of the most conservative people"
ever to serve as president of the United States, and his voting
records in both the House and Senate show he was among the most
conservative Democrats in the House and Senate.
Writes Beaman, “Kennedy’s reputation as a conservative likely cost him
the vice-presidential spot under Adlai Stevenson in 1956." And along
with his family’s staunch support of Sen. Joseph McCarthy, it almost
cost him the presidential endorsement of New York's Liberal Party in
1960, an event, Beaman notes, that could have doomed his White House
hopes.
Although JFK moved to the left for purely political reasons in his
final year in the White House, it was because he realized he needed
strong liberal support in the forthcoming 1964 election where he was
facing a strong challenge from his close friend Sen. Barry Goldwater,
a man despised by liberals, but one who JFK described as a dear friend
and "a man of decency and character."
It is almost laughable to hear today’s Democrat presidential
candidates such as Howard Dean invoke the Kennedy mystique while at
the same time attacking President Bush’s tax reductions.
Dean and the others would just as soon forget that it was JFK who
proved that reducing the tax burden on Americans almost automatically
boosted the U.S. economy to record heights. JFK’s tax cuts sent the
economy sky high, exactly as George Bush tax cuts are in the process
of doing today. And at the time JFK was slashing taxes across the
board, none of his fellow Democrats dared to accuse him of giving tax
breaks to the rich as they are saying about the Bush tax program.
Kennedy would have been shocked to see modern day Democrats cozy up to
Fidel Castro - a man JFK despised as a brutal, Marxist dictator.
Finally, it was thanks to JFK determination to fight organized crime -
often an ally of the big city Democrat machines that backed liberal
Democrat candidates - that the federal government launched the war
against the big crime families that eventually brought the Cosa Nostra
crashing down.
--
Left-wing liberals are EVERYTHING they accuse the right of being. They
are mean, vicious, hateful, greedy, cold-hearted, selfish, intolerant,
bigoted and racist.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lug Nut" |
|
| Title: Re: JFK Was No Left-Wing Liberal idiot like todays liberal idiots are. |
08 Aug 2004 10:36:55 PM |
|
|
"Michael Marxist Moore" <mmmoore@N0TSPAM.0RG> wrote in message
news:qgmdh09i924nc96lirr0m3b248du1av138@4ax.com...
JFK Was No Left-Wing Liberal idiot like todays liberal idiots are.
You just have to excuse the opinion of an unwashed, non American. You
people are the laughing stock of the entire world. Your Moron president
claims your enemies (by Bush's definition that is every country and leader
that disagrees with your policy) hate you because of your freedom. What a
joke, they hate you because of your war mongering and corporate dominated
foreign policy that fights wars for profit and rapes and pilages for profit.
You have a record of overthrowing countries with a social and democratic
government and putting pro American despot lackies in their place as it
suits you. You are also the most un-educated and un-dereducated imbeciles
on the face of the planet. Your political sytem and all of it's slime,
slander, malevolance, vitriol lies and distortions are an embarasmment. You
have an idiot president who is nothing but a puppet of corporate America and
not even elected but put in office by idiot judges who were appointed by
George Bush senior. And to top it off you fucking idiots want to dictate to
the rest of the world how it should function. The rest of the world says
***** YOU! Why don't you have another civil war, since there are obviously
more "Liberals" than right wing "Neocons" in your country that would be one
way of eliminating the problem once and for all. How about a little "Ethnic
Cleansing" America? You can get rid of these retarded inbred assholes once
and for all!
Lugnut
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Transition Zone" |
|
| Title: Re: JFK was no lazy lying nazi hatemonger warmonger (like bushites) |
28 Aug 2004 10:01:52 PM |
|
|
Phil Brennan
Friday Nov. 21, 2003
Democrats continue to cite the late President John F. Kennedy as being
an example of their kind of liberal - a man who would have approved of
the far-left policies and programs of today?s Democratic party. That?s
sheer nonsense. The record shows that JFK was neither their kind of
liberal nor an advocate of the socialist policies today's liberals
embrace, nor of their so-called "progressive" policies which place
them on the left of the political spectrum, nearly out there with Marx
and Lenin.
John F. Kennedy bore little resemblance to his brother Teddy Kennedy,
the U.S. Senate?s paragon of liberalism,
Like I'm so sure you can determine that better than his own brother can.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
