| Topic: |
Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus |
| User: |
"Robert B. Egan [aka NostraBOBus]" |
| Date: |
15 May 2004 07:21:38 PM |
| Object: |
The 10 Berg Beheading Pics Available Here |
CAUTION: ADULTS ONLY
NO VIDEO! NO SOUND! PIC SET ONLY
go to:
http://www.mainstreetwebcentral.com
.
|
|
| User: "bollogs" |
|
| Title: Bob's pic sequence |
16 May 2004 09:41:31 AM |
|
|
(Robert B. Egan [aka NostraBOBus]) wrote in message news:<e5ddd8b4.0405151621.42d218a3@posting.google.com>...
CAUTION: ADULTS ONLY
NO VIDEO! NO SOUND! PIC SET ONLY
go to:
http://www.mainstreetwebcentral.com
Who put them in the sequence that you have them in? Was it you?
Because as events unfold then you could be forgiven for putting them
in that sequence but if you go after the times registered on the video
camera it looks weird. In the time sequence it looks like this:
Time pic no. in series condition
13:45:47 3 on the floor having throat cut (head on)
13:46:31 6 Still having throat cut (head on)
13:47:47 5 Head off
13:47:47 8 Head still off
13:47:52 7 Head in hand
13:48:42 9 Head being carried
2:18:41 2 Sitting looking at the camera (head on)
2:40:06 1 Sitting on the floor (head on)
2:44:10 4 Getting pulled to the floor (head on)
2:46:18 10 Head held up for camera
That the video camera suddenly changed it's time format is beyond me,
(unless they stopped filming and manually changed it to confuse us?).
This doesn't make sense! At 13:45 he was having his throat cut whilst
being held on the floor by his assailants...13:46 he was still being
attacked. At 13:47 his head was off, two pics at 13:47 both with his
head off. Then at 13:48 one of the assailants was carrying the severed
head. Then approximately half an hour later at 2:18 he was sitting
looking at the camera. The following pic has him sitting on the floor
looking at the camera at 2:40. Both these pics were shown on the telly
the "day" this happened. At 2:44 he was dragged to the floor...this
was also shown on the telly but they cut it just here. Then at 2:46
they displayed the head for the camera as in the pic on your site.
Now this sequence of events makes no sense at all. What the fuckin'
hell is going on? Even if they did change the time format manually it
makes no sense. He was still sitting down talking to the camera after
his head was cut off, and miraculously his head was back on. And even
if they made him do the talking at an earlier time than actually
cutting his head off it makes no sense because the head was displayed
for the camera 2mins and 8secs after he was pulled to the floor
2:46:18...when according to the time stamps he had already had his
head cut off just about an hour before...or they cut his head off the
following afternoon at 13:47:47.
Something smells fishy about this whole thingie people something is
seriously out of order...and then there's the orange jump suit, and
the unusually bashful Al-Qaida members who uncharacteristically made
themselves unrecognisable by covering their faces...but immediately
after the deed went public with it claiming it was them.
Nah...
WH
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Bob's pic sequence |
17 May 2004 07:07:50 AM |
|
|
"bollogs" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a666e2c5.0405160641.14129d17@posting.google.com...
nostrabobus4u@aol.com (Robert B. Egan [aka NostraBOBus]) wrote in message
news:<e5ddd8b4.0405151621.42d218a3@posting.google.com>...
CAUTION: ADULTS ONLY
NO VIDEO! NO SOUND! PIC SET ONLY
go to:
http://www.mainstreetwebcentral.com
Who put them in the sequence that you have them in? Was it you?
Because as events unfold then you could be forgiven for putting them
in that sequence but if you go after the times registered on the video
camera it looks weird. In the time sequence it looks like this:
Time pic no. in series condition
13:45:47 3 on the floor having throat cut (head on)
13:46:31 6 Still having throat cut (head on)
13:47:47 5 Head off
13:47:47 8 Head still off
13:47:52 7 Head in hand
13:48:42 9 Head being carried
2:18:41 2 Sitting looking at the camera (head on)
2:40:06 1 Sitting on the floor (head on)
2:44:10 4 Getting pulled to the floor (head on)
2:46:18 10 Head held up for camera
That the video camera suddenly changed it's time format is beyond me,
(unless they stopped filming and manually changed it to confuse us?).
This doesn't make sense! At 13:45 he was having his throat cut whilst
being held on the floor by his assailants...13:46 he was still being
attacked. At 13:47 his head was off, two pics at 13:47 both with his
head off. Then at 13:48 one of the assailants was carrying the severed
head. Then approximately half an hour later at 2:18 he was sitting
looking at the camera. The following pic has him sitting on the floor
looking at the camera at 2:40. Both these pics were shown on the telly
the "day" this happened. At 2:44 he was dragged to the floor...this
was also shown on the telly but they cut it just here. Then at 2:46
they displayed the head for the camera as in the pic on your site.
Now this sequence of events makes no sense at all. What the fuckin'
hell is going on? Even if they did change the time format manually it
makes no sense. He was still sitting down talking to the camera after
his head was cut off, and miraculously his head was back on. And even
if they made him do the talking at an earlier time than actually
cutting his head off it makes no sense because the head was displayed
for the camera 2mins and 8secs after he was pulled to the floor
2:46:18...when according to the time stamps he had already had his
head cut off just about an hour before...or they cut his head off the
following afternoon at 13:47:47.
Or they used two cameras with different time/dates set?
Something smells fishy about this whole thingie people something is
seriously out of order...and then there's the orange jump suit
I presume an orange jumpsuit isn't exactly difficult to get hold of, and no
doubt it was used to hammer home the point that this was "retaliation" for
Camp X-Ray etc.
and the unusually bashful Al-Qaida members who uncharacteristically made
themselves unrecognisable by covering their faces...
...as they did in the Daniel Pear video.
but immediately after the deed went public with it claiming it was them.
Well the IRA used to do that, but they didn't release the names of who
planted the bombs..
Nah...
I don't know whether AQ did this or not, but I can't see much credible
evidence tha they didn't...
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Bob's pic sequence |
16 May 2004 10:05:14 AM |
|
|
In article <a666e2c5.0405160641.14129d17@posting.google.com>, (bollogs) wrote:
nostrabobus4u@aol.com (Robert B. Egan [aka NostraBOBus]) wrote in message
news:<e5ddd8b4.0405151621.42d218a3@posting.google.com>...
CAUTION: ADULTS ONLY
NO VIDEO! NO SOUND! PIC SET ONLY
go to:
http://www.mainstreetwebcentral.com
Who put them in the sequence that you have them in? Was it you?
Because as events unfold then you could be forgiven for putting them
in that sequence but if you go after the times registered on the video
camera it looks weird. In the time sequence it looks like this:
Time pic no. in series condition
13:45:47 3 on the floor having throat cut (head
on)
13:46:31 6 Still having throat cut (head on)
13:47:47 5 Head off
13:47:47 8 Head still off
13:47:52 7 Head in hand
13:48:42 9 Head being carried
2:18:41 2 Sitting looking at the camera (head on)
2:40:06 1 Sitting on the floor (head on)
2:44:10 4 Getting pulled to the floor (head on)
2:46:18 10 Head held up for camera
That the video camera suddenly changed it's time format is beyond me,
(unless they stopped filming and manually changed it to confuse us?).
This doesn't make sense! At 13:45 he was having his throat cut whilst
being held on the floor by his assailants...13:46 he was still being
attacked. At 13:47 his head was off, two pics at 13:47 both with his
head off. Then at 13:48 one of the assailants was carrying the severed
head. Then approximately half an hour later at 2:18 he was sitting
looking at the camera. The following pic has him sitting on the floor
looking at the camera at 2:40. Both these pics were shown on the telly
the "day" this happened. At 2:44 he was dragged to the floor...this
was also shown on the telly but they cut it just here. Then at 2:46
they displayed the head for the camera as in the pic on your site.
Now this sequence of events makes no sense at all. What the fuckin'
hell is going on? Even if they did change the time format manually it
makes no sense. He was still sitting down talking to the camera after
his head was cut off, and miraculously his head was back on. And even
if they made him do the talking at an earlier time than actually
cutting his head off it makes no sense because the head was displayed
for the camera 2mins and 8secs after he was pulled to the floor
2:46:18...when according to the time stamps he had already had his
head cut off just about an hour before...or they cut his head off the
following afternoon at 13:47:47.
Something smells fishy about this whole thingie people something is
seriously out of order...and then there's the orange jump suit, and
the unusually bashful Al-Qaida members who uncharacteristically made
themselves unrecognisable by covering their faces...but immediately
after the deed went public with it claiming it was them.
Nah...
The other half and I were discussing this whole bizarre episode a little while
ago. It just doesn't make sense the way it went.
However, he did have something of an epiphany during the conversation - who
would have the most to risk/lose if Iraq were to become a democracy? Saudi
Arabia! Taking that into consideration, where have nearly all the
anti-American terrorists come from? Saudi Arabia! And *who* was it that was
made privy to the American war plans, even before Secretary of State Colin
Powell - Saudi Arabia!
Now there's a scary connect-the-dots!
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "bollogs" |
|
| Title: Re: Bob's pic sequence |
16 May 2004 04:42:42 PM |
|
|
(Woodswun) wrote in message news:<KqLpc.194075$M3.112050@twister.nyroc.rr.com>...
In article <a666e2c5.0405160641.14129d17@posting.google.com>, (bollogs) wrote:
nostrabobus4u@aol.com (Robert B. Egan [aka NostraBOBus]) wrote in message
news:<e5ddd8b4.0405151621.42d218a3@posting.google.com>...
CAUTION: ADULTS ONLY
NO VIDEO! NO SOUND! PIC SET ONLY
go to:
http://www.mainstreetwebcentral.com
Who put them in the sequence that you have them in? Was it you?
Because as events unfold then you could be forgiven for putting them
in that sequence but if you go after the times registered on the video
camera it looks weird. In the time sequence it looks like this:
Time pic no. in series condition
13:45:47 3 on the floor having throat cut (head
on)
13:46:31 6 Still having throat cut (head on)
13:47:47 5 Head off
13:47:47 8 Head still off
13:47:52 7 Head in hand
13:48:42 9 Head being carried
2:18:41 2 Sitting looking at the camera (head on)
2:40:06 1 Sitting on the floor (head on)
2:44:10 4 Getting pulled to the floor (head on)
2:46:18 10 Head held up for camera
That the video camera suddenly changed it's time format is beyond me,
(unless they stopped filming and manually changed it to confuse us?).
This doesn't make sense! At 13:45 he was having his throat cut whilst
being held on the floor by his assailants...13:46 he was still being
attacked. At 13:47 his head was off, two pics at 13:47 both with his
head off. Then at 13:48 one of the assailants was carrying the severed
head. Then approximately half an hour later at 2:18 he was sitting
looking at the camera. The following pic has him sitting on the floor
looking at the camera at 2:40. Both these pics were shown on the telly
the "day" this happened. At 2:44 he was dragged to the floor...this
was also shown on the telly but they cut it just here. Then at 2:46
they displayed the head for the camera as in the pic on your site.
Now this sequence of events makes no sense at all. What the fuckin'
hell is going on? Even if they did change the time format manually it
makes no sense. He was still sitting down talking to the camera after
his head was cut off, and miraculously his head was back on. And even
if they made him do the talking at an earlier time than actually
cutting his head off it makes no sense because the head was displayed
for the camera 2mins and 8secs after he was pulled to the floor
2:46:18...when according to the time stamps he had already had his
head cut off just about an hour before...or they cut his head off the
following afternoon at 13:47:47.
Something smells fishy about this whole thingie people something is
seriously out of order...and then there's the orange jump suit, and
the unusually bashful Al-Qaida members who uncharacteristically made
themselves unrecognisable by covering their faces...but immediately
after the deed went public with it claiming it was them.
Nah...
The other half and I were discussing this whole bizarre episode a little while
ago. It just doesn't make sense the way it went.
However, he did have something of an epiphany during the conversation - who
would have the most to risk/lose if Iraq were to become a democracy? Saudi
Arabia! Taking that into consideration, where have nearly all the
anti-American terrorists come from? Saudi Arabia! And *who* was it that was
made privy to the American war plans, even before Secretary of State Colin
Powell - Saudi Arabia!
Now there's a scary connect-the-dots!
Woods
Look at the link provoided by Bob Woods. Tell me if I'm wrong. The
pictures are not particularly obscene...OK not as sickening as one
could imagine, obscene they are of course. Follow it after the times
registered on the video camera. And see if you come to the same
conclusions that I did. Maybe I missed something...it would be good to
have it looked at by someone else just to either prove that I'm right
or tell me I got it wrong.
WH
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cuan" |
|
| Title: Re: Bob's pic sequence |
17 May 2004 07:08:38 AM |
|
|
On 16 May 2004 07:41:31 -0700, (bollogs) wrote:
Time pic no. in series condition
13:45:47 3 on the floor having throat cut (head on)
13:46:31 6 Still having throat cut (head on)
13:47:47 5 Head off
13:47:47 8 Head still off
13:47:52 7 Head in hand
13:48:42 9 Head being carried
2:18:41 2 Sitting looking at the camera (head on)
2:40:06 1 Sitting on the floor (head on)
2:44:10 4 Getting pulled to the floor (head on)
2:46:18 10 Head held up for camera
my probable order would go like this...
02 - 02:18 - morning (day 1)
01 - 02:40
04 - 02:44
03 - 13:45 - afternoon (day 1)
06 - 13:46
05 - 13:47.47
08 - 13.47.47
07 - 13:47.52
09 - 13:48.42
10 - 02:46 - morning (day 2)
number 10 would be an enigma, unless they kept the head sitting there
for nearly thirteen hours before they decided it was time for another
photo shoot.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
