The Five Morons Revisited
By Paul Craig Roberts
8-30-6


When the neocons launched the Bush administration's invasions of
Afghanistan and Iraq and announced plans for invading Syria and Iran,
I labeled Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, and Rice "the Five
Morons." With the passage of time, I see that I overestimated their
mental capabilities.

The "cakewalk" war has now lasted longer than World War II with Nazi
Germany, and no end is in sight. It has cost the U.S. taxpayers $310
billion in out-of-pocket costs, with many additional hundreds of
billions coming due in veterans' medical bills and other expenses yet
to be paid.

To carry on this pointless war, which has achieved nothing but death,
destruction, and hatred of America, Bush has had to call up inactive
reserves who long ago completed their active-duty service to their
country and have managed to get on with their lives. It is well known
that the older one gets the harder it is to find employment or the
energy to restart a mothballed business. But Bush is too busy saving
us from terrorism to care about people's lives.

Despite the lack of U.S. troops and Bush's inability to prevail in
Afghanistan and Iraq, neocons in Bush's government are working around
the clock to instigate war with Iran and Syria.

I thought that I had Rumsfeld pegged as the complete dolt, but I was
stunned when I read Associated Press reporter Robert Burns' account of
what Rumsfeld told 200 Navy aviators in a question and answer session
at Fallon Naval Air Station on Aug. 28. "The thing that keeps me up at
night," said Rumsfeld, is the success of terrorist groups in
"manipulating the media."

Rumsfeld told the pilots that terrorists "are actively manipulating
the media in this country" by falsely blaming U.S. troops for civilian
deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan. All that "collateral damage" we hear
about, the tens of thousands of dead and maimed civilians, is just
terrorist propaganda. "The enemy lies constantly and with impunity.
The enemy is so much better at communicating." Rumsfeld made similar
remarks to the Veterans of Foreign Wars convention in Reno, Nevada,
where he was presented the Dwight D. Eisenhower Distinguished Service
Award. Eisenhower must be rolling over in his grave.

Now I get it. When Fox News' Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly assured us
that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction that would be used
against us if we didn't strike first, they were being manipulated by
Osama bin Laden, who used America to get rid of the secular Saddam
Hussein and to create a new training and recruitment ground for
al-Qaeda and fundamentalist fanatics.

When the New York Times let Judith Miller serve as a propagandist for
war with Iraq, the Times was being manipulated by Muslim terrorists,
not by neocons.

When CNN and columnists like Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin reassure
us that we will win the war unless we pull out prematurely, they are
being manipulated by terrorists. Finally I understand what the Weekly
Standard, National Review, the Wall Street Journal editorial page, the
American Enterprise Institute, and the online site FrontPageMag are
all about.

The terrorists are so clever at manipulation that Americans cannot
perceive that we have been sucked deep into a war that is creating the
Islamic fundamentalism we so desperately fear.

Obviously, I misjudged Rumsfeld's intelligence. Anyone who can figure
out the Muslim conspiracy is off the charts. What I can't figure is
why Rumsfeld is willing for America to continue to be sucked in. Don't
tell me that terrorists are manipulating Rumsfeld, too!

I keep waiting for the money appeal from AIPAC. I already know what it
is going to say: "Although AIPAC is undisputedly the most powerful
lobby in America and can determine with impunity the fate of every
elected official, we cannot match the terrorists' ability to
manipulate the media. Polls show that terrorists' manipulation of the
U.S. media is causing American support for the war to dwindle away.
Please send more millions to counter the terrorists' control of the
American media. We are winning in the Middle East but losing at home."
One of the lessons one learns in life is that things are not always
what they seem to be. Before I watched Stephen Walt and John
Mearsheimer's National Press Club broadcast on C-SPAN (Aug. 28), I
regarded AIPAC as Israel's friend and promoter. Now I realize that I
was wrong. As the two distinguished professors made perfectly clear,
anyone who cares about the survival of Israel should scorn the bribes,
threats, and blandishments of AIPAC.

AIPAC led the Israeli government onto a path where diplomacy is no
longer a tool that Israel can use. Instead, Israel relies on Mao's
dictum that "power comes out of the barrel of a gun," or from a
bulldozer that knocks down Palestinians' homes, uproots their olive
groves, and enrages Muslims at Israel's inhumanity. Backed into a
corner with no tool but violence, Israel faces hundreds of millions of
increasingly angry Muslims.

If Bush were a true friend of Israel, he would never have let Israel
again destroy Lebanon, this time under the pretext of striking at
Hezbollah.

AIPAC and Bush have allowed, or caused, Israel to do itself so much
damage in the eyes of Muslims and the wider world that a peaceful
resolution in the Middle East is no longer in people's thoughts. With
the mighty U.S. military checked in Iraq by a handful of Sunnis, and
the mighty Israeli army checked in Lebanon by a handful of Hezbollah,
violence is unlikely to settle the matter in a way that neocons in the
U.S. and hardliners in Israel would like.

The only hope is that Bush and Olmert miraculously turn into grown
men, admit their mistakes, apologize, send reparations, and commit to
winning acceptance of Israel and America based on their good behavior.
It would be nice to see in operation some of the superior morality
that the two claim.

Considering their extraordinary hubris and self-righteousness, nothing
like this can possibly happen. Israel, the U.S., and the Muslim world
will continue to bleed.