*
With December 26, 2006, having passed without any attempt upon
the life of French President Jacques Chirac, and with his March
11, 2007, announcement that he would not seek re-election for a
third consecutive term, the most basic honesty calls for yet
another review of this 'prophecy' discovered in cryptic anagrams
from many quatrains by Nostradamus.
*
BACKGROUND
*
One of the very first events discovered hidden in Nostradamus'
poetry via the cryptic anagram technique was the assassination of
a future French President, Mr. Jacques Chirac. That discovery was
made at the end of 1994 and early 1995, when François Mitterrand
was still in office. Mr. Chirac was indeed a candidate to succeed
him, but the then French Prime Minister, Mr. Édouard Balladur,
was topping all opinion polls as the winner of that coming
election; and he was not even yet a candidate! For the
Socialists, Mr. Jacques Delors had announced that he would not
run for President. That was the political picture then. (Mr.
Chirac eventually got elected.)
*
The cryptic anagrams referring to the Chirac murder were
defective on at least one point: the date of that crime. At
first, a December 30 date had been mistakenly found. December 26
later became the 'correct' date. But the year was never correctly
found. What were some of the other circumstances of that crime?
*
In retaliation for the killing, on December 26, 1994, by a French
swat-team, of four Islamic hijackers on the tarmac of the
Marseille-Marignane airport, where the Air France Airbus they had
seized in Algiers two days before had stopped for re-fueling,
pending a 9/11-style kamikaze attack upon the Eiffel Tower in
Paris, the Algerian G.I.A. (Groupe islamique armé) -- or what was
left of it, as it had often been decapitated -- explodes a huge
bomb near the Élysée Palace, in Paris, killing French President
Chirac.
*
These circumstances can only materialize if Mr. Chirac spends the
Christmas Holidays in Paris. Problem: he almost never does!
*
Second problem: this assassination is supposed to happen only
when Paris no longer fears such an attack. On the latest December
26 (2006), that condition was not being met: the anti-terror plan
called 'Vigipirate' was still in force, at a high level, as
France is still a potential target of Islamic suicide bombers.
*
Third problem: December 26, 2006, was the very last of Mr.
Chirac's current presidency. So, unless he were to announce his
intention to seek a third term of office (and he just announced
the opposite), his last term of office shall normally end this
Spring, and the 64 cryptic anagrams announcing his assassination
*as President* on a future December 26 shall automatically be
shown to have been incorrect.
*
What are these 64 cryptic anagrams? For those able to read them,
here they are:
*
I-8
--------------- Bien des loys seront faictes ici pour --------
--------------- chasser les Arabes se vengeant tant bien -----
--------------- que mal à Paris, tuant le Président Chirac ---
--------------- qui a osé braver leur dernier Gihad. ---------
*
I-79
--------------- L'élection condamne le Bon Chirac au ---------
--------------- sort mesme que mon Oracle en prose luy -------
--------------- donne hélas icy, car la rude Bombe tirée -----
--------------- peu après Noël vouloit tant le tuer. ---------
*
III-61
--------------- Le Grand Chirac est tué en Décembre ----------
--------------- par des Apostres de l'Islam, en --------------
--------------- face du cher logis nommé Elisée, pour --------
--------------- que l'on ait Foy en la terreur d'Islam. ------
*
III-95
--------------- « Quel vil Islam ! », dira la France, broyée -
--------------- par la vue de son Président Chirac tué peu ---
--------------- après Noël à Paris, le Vingt Six Décembre, ---
--------------- quand Paris ne redoute plus vne atacque. -----
*
IV-99
--------------- Claude !__Ton liure est dans la Ville --------
--------------- de Paris quand le Ciel pleure fort son -------
--------------- Iacques, fouldroyé en Décembre par l'Islam ---
--------------- d'Algérie qui s'oppose au si Bon Président ! -
*
V-70
--------------- En Décembre, le G.I.A. assassin cause la -----
--------------- Mort du très grand Président de la France, ung
--------------- Iacques fort bien esleu, exécuté à tort ------
--------------- par la Terreur qui tue en France. ------------
*
V-80
-------------- Après vng Beau Noël, Mon Grand Chirac, --------
-------------- qui a chassé les Arabes enragés ---------------
-------------- de l'Islam si violent, sera exécuté quand -----
-------------- leur Barbare G.I.A. punit la bien Chère France.
*
VII-7
--------------- Le grand Chirac est exécuté soubs un ---------
--------------- ordre du féroce G.I.A., icy, en France, ------
--------------- terreur du Vingt Six Décembre dans Mon -------
--------------- Paris que ma digne prose ose affoller. -------
*
IX-5
--------------- En Décembre, Paris aura pour Président -------
--------------- vn Bon Sénateur qui a veu la Mort du ---------
--------------- Président Iacques Chirac, tué pour -----------
--------------- punir la Mort, icy, de quatre d'Algérie. -----
*
IX-26
--------------- Nice sera terrorisé du Plutonium des ---------
--------------- ennemis Algériens de la France après ---------
--------------- que le Présydent Chirac aura son Meurtre -----
--------------- par vne bien grosse Bombe de l'Islam. --------
*
IX-37
--------------- En Décembre, Mon Bon Paris est bien ----------
--------------- oultragé, car honteusement le G.I.A. ---------
--------------- si féroce tue horriblement dessus ------------
--------------- Mon Paris un Bon Iacques autant pleuré. ------
*
IX-41
--------------- Vng assassin tue le Grand Chirac, icy --------
--------------- mesme à Paris, le rude lendemain de Noël -----
--------------- iamais creu par le tant Bon Président --------
--------------- de France qui aura trop ri de ma rude prose. -
*
X-61
--------------- Mon Oracle barbare est en France -------------
--------------- en l'An qui verra une rude Barbarie tost -----
--------------- après Noël, le Meurtre de Iacques ------------
--------------- Chirac, trop rudement tué soubz l'Islam. -----
*
X-86
--------------- Le Grand Chirac perd la Vie et vn Bon Homme --
--------------- qui a Mon Digne Oracle accède ----------------
--------------- à la trop rude Présidence quand vng sot G.I.A.
--------------- ordonne icy vne folle Barbarie. --------------
*
X-87
--------------- Nostre Paris perd son Grand Président l'Hyver-
--------------- après Noël, car il fera fi de mon très -------
--------------- sage Oracle dessus l'Année Dix Sept ----------
--------------- parlant pourtant de Marseille. ---------------
*
X-88
-------------- Vae !__Vae !__Le Noël du Président Chirac -----
-------------- se termine très mal pour Nostre France, -------
-------------- car son Président a raillé l'idée de ma -------
-------------- prose sus le gros TREIZE, icy, l'An MMUU Sept !
*
So, unless fate were to create unforeseen circumstances which
would bring Mr. Chirac back *as President* for yet another
December 26, these 64 cryptic anagrams should be considered, for
the time being, mostly incorrect.
*
Have a nice day, folks!
*
------------------- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Claude Latrémouille % -- "Claude! There ain't no stinkin' -- %
Le 11 mars 2007 --- % cryptic anagrams in them dang verses,- %
APNCL#1497 -------- % ya hear?!" (A chorus of a.p.n. voices) %
------------------- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
*
=== ===
=== CLAUDE LATRÉMOUILLE ===
===========================
.
|
|
| User: "Krib" |
|
| Title: Re: The Chirac non-event |
11 Mar 2007 03:35:48 PM |
|
|
"Claude Latremouille" <cj559@FreeNet.Carleton.CA> wrote in message
news:et1klf$ar6$1@theodyn.ncf.ca...
<blah blah blah>
So, unless fate were to create unforeseen circumstances which
would bring Mr. Chirac back *as President* for yet another
December 26, these 64 cryptic anagrams should be considered, for
the time being, mostly incorrect.
Wrong again eh fraude, your record of 100% failure will be intact
yet you're still too full of your own importance to see the truth
such a fact pertains.
Ah well, the price of ignorance and ego is nought for those who
are desperate to pay it eh liar?
--
krib
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Chirac non-event |
11 Mar 2007 04:56:03 PM |
|
|
On Mar 12, 5:18 am, (Claude Latremouille)
wrote:
*
With December 26, 2006, having passed without any attempt upon
the life of French President Jacques Chirac, and with his March
11, 2007, announcement that he would not seek re-election for a
third consecutive term, the most basic honesty calls for yet
another review of this 'prophecy' discovered in cryptic anagrams
from many quatrains by Nostradamus.
*
BACKGROUND
*
One of the very first events discovered hidden in Nostradamus'
poetry via the cryptic anagram technique was the assassination of
a future French President, Mr. Jacques Chirac. That discovery was
made at the end of 1994 and early 1995, when Fran=E7ois Mitterrand
was still in office. Mr. Chirac was indeed a candidate to succeed
him, but the then French Prime Minister, Mr. =C9douard Balladur,
was topping all opinion polls as the winner of that coming
election; and he was not even yet a candidate! For the
Socialists, Mr. Jacques Delors had announced that he would not
run for President. That was the political picture then. (Mr.
Chirac eventually got elected.)
*
The cryptic anagrams referring to the Chirac murder were
defective on at least one point: the date of that crime. At
first, a December 30 date had been mistakenly found. December 26
later became the 'correct' date. But the year was never correctly
found. What were some of the other circumstances of that crime?
*
In retaliation for the killing, on December 26, 1994, by a French
swat-team, of four Islamic hijackers on the tarmac of the
Marseille-Marignane airport, where the Air France Airbus they had
seized in Algiers two days before had stopped for re-fueling,
pending a 9/11-style kamikaze attack upon the Eiffel Tower in
Paris, the Algerian G.I.A. (Groupe islamique arm=E9) -- or what was
left of it, as it had often been decapitated -- explodes a huge
bomb near the =C9lys=E9e Palace, in Paris, killing French President
Chirac.
*
These circumstances can only materialize if Mr. Chirac spends the
Christmas Holidays in Paris. Problem: he almost never does!
*
Second problem: this assassination is supposed to happen only
when Paris no longer fears such an attack. On the latest December
26 (2006), that condition was not being met: the anti-terror plan
called 'Vigipirate' was still in force, at a high level, as
France is still a potential target of Islamic suicide bombers.
*
Third problem: December 26, 2006, was the very last of Mr.
Chirac's current presidency. So, unless he were to announce his
intention to seek a third term of office (and he just announced
the opposite), his last term of office shall normally end this
Spring, and the 64 cryptic anagrams announcing his assassination
*as President* on a future December 26 shall automatically be
shown to have been incorrect.
*
What are these 64 cryptic anagrams? For those able to read them,
here they are:
*
I-8
--------------- Bien des loys seront faictes ici pour --------
--------------- chasser les Arabes se vengeant tant bien -----
--------------- que mal =E0 Paris, tuant le Pr=E9sident Chirac ---
--------------- qui a os=E9 braver leur dernier Gihad. ---------
*
I-79
--------------- L'=E9lection condamne le Bon Chirac au ---------
--------------- sort mesme que mon Oracle en prose luy -------
--------------- donne h=E9las icy, car la rude Bombe tir=E9e -----
--------------- peu apr=E8s No=EBl vouloit tant le tuer. ---------
*
III-61
--------------- Le Grand Chirac est tu=E9 en D=E9cembre ----------
--------------- par des Apostres de l'Islam, en --------------
--------------- face du cher logis nomm=E9 Elis=E9e, pour --------
--------------- que l'on ait Foy en la terreur d'Islam. ------
*
III-95
--------------- =AB Quel vil Islam ! =BB, dira la France, broy=E9e -
--------------- par la vue de son Pr=E9sident Chirac tu=E9 peu ---
--------------- apr=E8s No=EBl =E0 Paris, le Vingt Six D=E9cembre, ---
--------------- quand Paris ne redoute plus vne atacque. -----
*
IV-99
--------------- Claude !__Ton liure est dans la Ville --------
--------------- de Paris quand le Ciel pleure fort son -------
--------------- Iacques, fouldroy=E9 en D=E9cembre par l'Islam ---
--------------- d'Alg=E9rie qui s'oppose au si Bon Pr=E9sident ! -
*
V-70
--------------- En D=E9cembre, le G.I.A. assassin cause la -----
--------------- Mort du tr=E8s grand Pr=E9sident de la France, ung
--------------- Iacques fort bien esleu, ex=E9cut=E9 =E0 tort ------
--------------- par la Terreur qui tue en France. ------------
*
V-80
-------------- Apr=E8s vng Beau No=EBl, Mon Grand Chirac, --------
-------------- qui a chass=E9 les Arabes enrag=E9s ---------------
-------------- de l'Islam si violent, sera ex=E9cut=E9 quand -----
-------------- leur Barbare G.I.A. punit la bien Ch=E8re France.
*
VII-7
--------------- Le grand Chirac est ex=E9cut=E9 soubs un ---------
--------------- ordre du f=E9roce G.I.A., icy, en France, ------
--------------- terreur du Vingt Six D=E9cembre dans Mon -------
--------------- Paris que ma digne prose ose affoller. -------
*
IX-5
--------------- En D=E9cembre, Paris aura pour Pr=E9sident -------
--------------- vn Bon S=E9nateur qui a veu la Mort du ---------
--------------- Pr=E9sident Iacques Chirac, tu=E9 pour -----------
--------------- punir la Mort, icy, de quatre d'Alg=E9rie. -----
*
IX-26
--------------- Nice sera terroris=E9 du Plutonium des ---------
--------------- ennemis Alg=E9riens de la France apr=E8s ---------
--------------- que le Pr=E9sydent Chirac aura son Meurtre -----
--------------- par vne bien grosse Bombe de l'Islam. --------
*
IX-37
--------------- En D=E9cembre, Mon Bon Paris est bien ----------
--------------- oultrag=E9, car honteusement le G.I.A. ---------
--------------- si f=E9roce tue horriblement dessus ------------
--------------- Mon Paris un Bon Iacques autant pleur=E9. ------
*
IX-41
--------------- Vng assassin tue le Grand Chirac, icy --------
--------------- mesme =E0 Paris, le rude lendemain de No=EBl -----
--------------- iamais creu par le tant Bon Pr=E9sident --------
--------------- de France qui aura trop ri de ma rude prose. -
*
X-61
--------------- Mon Oracle barbare est en France -------------
--------------- en l'An qui verra une rude Barbarie tost -----
--------------- apr=E8s No=EBl, le Meurtre de Iacques ------------
--------------- Chirac, trop rudement tu=E9 soubz l'Islam. -----
*
X-86
--------------- Le Grand Chirac perd la Vie et vn Bon Homme --
--------------- qui a Mon Digne Oracle acc=E8de ----------------
--------------- =E0 la trop rude Pr=E9sidence quand vng sot G.I.A.
--------------- ordonne icy vne folle Barbarie. --------------
*
X-87
--------------- Nostre Paris perd son Grand Pr=E9sident l'Hyver-
--------------- apr=E8s No=EBl, car il fera fi de mon tr=E8s -------
--------------- sage Oracle dessus l'Ann=E9e Dix Sept ----------
--------------- parlant pourtant de Marseille. ---------------
*
X-88
-------------- Vae !__Vae !__Le No=EBl du Pr=E9sident Chirac -----
-------------- se termine tr=E8s mal pour Nostre France, -------
-------------- car son Pr=E9sident a raill=E9 l'id=E9e de ma -------
-------------- prose sus le gros TREIZE, icy, l'An MMUU Sept !
*
So, unless fate were to create unforeseen circumstances which
would bring Mr. Chirac back *as President* for yet another
December 26, these 64 cryptic anagrams should be considered, for
the time being, mostly incorrect.
*
Have a nice day, folks!
*
------------------- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Claude Latr=E9mouille % -- "Claude! There ain't no stinkin' -- %
Le 11 mars 2007 --- % cryptic anagrams in them dang verses,- %
APNCL#1497 -------- % ya hear?!" (A chorus of a.p.n. voices) %
------------------- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
*
=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D CLAUDE LATR=C9MOUILLE =3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Oh dear at least he can say he is wrong when it is clearly the case.
But this is not about honesty, it is about rhyme based anagrams being
a DUD.
For instance there is not set methodology.
Regardez:
1-8
--------------- Bien des loys seront faictes ici pour --------
--------------- chasser les Arabes se vengeant tant bien -----
--------------- que mal =E0 Paris, tuant le Pr=E9sident Chirac ---
--------------- qui a os=E9 braver leur dernier Gihad. ---------
Looks like a set story?
Now we have no set order of verbiage so any sequence then can apply:
Bien des loys seront faictes ici pour
chasser le Pr=E9sident Chirac se vengeant tant bien
que mal =E0 Paris, tuant les Arabes
qui a os=E9 braver leur dernier Gihad
Note Quatrain rhyme has left in both cases.
LB
Keeping it objective empirical and Honest.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: The Chirac non-event |
11 Mar 2007 09:20:50 PM |
|
|
<leigh8bee@optusnet.com.au> a écrit dans le message de news:
1173650163.433482.236910@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 12, 5:18 am, (Claude Latremouille)
wrote:
*
With December 26, 2006, having passed without any attempt upon
the life of French President Jacques Chirac, and with his March
[SNIP]
Oh dear at least he can say he is wrong when it is clearly the case.
But this is not about honesty, it is about rhyme based anagrams being
a DUD.
For instance there is not set methodology.
Regardez:
1-8
--------------- Bien des loys seront faictes ici pour --------
--------------- chasser les Arabes se vengeant tant bien -----
--------------- que mal à Paris, tuant le Président Chirac ---
--------------- qui a osé braver leur dernier Gihad. ---------
Looks like a set story?
Now we have no set order of verbiage so any sequence then can apply:
Bien des loys seront faictes ici pour
chasser le Président Chirac se vengeant tant bien
que mal à Paris, tuant les Arabes
qui a osé braver leur dernier Gihad
Note Quatrain rhyme has left in both cases.
LB
Keeping it objective empirical and Honest.
Honest? Come on! This is not even Nostradamus, and it can,t be based on any
possible encryptology whatsoever since his methodiology gives a myriad of
possibilities that can say anything at all.
The only way this would be of any possible value would be if he was privy to
god's revelations but he pretends it is the Seer who would have encrypted it
that way, and hasn,t yet pretended that there is any direct connection with
the dead prophet so all this output from his game of scrabbl;e with the
prophecies are just his imagination. He could make it say anything else.
Besides, do you think the Seer would have used the word Jihad?
This guy is a joke through and through.
But even if he is a joker on topic, he defames the prophecies. So it is hard
to say which is worst, those jokers who can only spread lies and attack
posters, who want nothing to do with the Seer, or this one who plays with
the prophetic words and the credulity of others.
Either way, it doesn't leave many here worthy of this NG, i.e. who have the
respect for the subject of its topic, at least amongst those that are vocal
these days.
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: The Chirac non-event |
12 Mar 2007 04:59:24 AM |
|
|
On Mar 12, 2:20?am, "Jean Guernon" <jguer...@globetrotter.net> wrote:
"Either way, it doesn't leave many here worthy of this NG, i.e. who
have the respect for the subject of its topic, at least amongst those
that are vocal these days."
That's the problem with all 'lost causes' Jean. All beliefs,
Nostradamus, the 'Flat Earth Society' etc., a few adherents still
linger.
Sadly for those people, all of the rhetoric, all of the mystic talk
still won't cause the Earth to be 'flat'.
Nor will it provide any prediction.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Claude Latremouille" |
|
| Title: Re: The Chirac non-event |
12 Mar 2007 01:30:48 PM |
|
|
*
On 11 Mar 2007 14:56:03 -0700, "leigh8bee@optusnet.com.au"
<leigh8bee@optusnet.com.au> gave us a splendid demonstration of
his unfathomable stupidity.
*
It concerns a deciphered text from quatrain I-8. First, the
quatrain:
*
-------------- C E N T V R I E___P R E M I E R E. ------------
----------------------- (édition de 1555) --------------------
*
----- 8 - Combien de foys prinse cité solaire ----------------
--------- Seras,changeant les loys barbares & vaines. --------
--------- Ton mal s'aproche:Plus seras tributaire ------------
--------- La grand Hadrie reourira tes veines. ---------------
*
And the deciphered text:
*
--------- Bien des loys seront faictes ici pour --------------
--------- chasser les Arabes se vengeant tant bien -----------
--------- que mal à Paris, tuant le Président Chirac ---------
--------- qui a osé braver leur dernier Gihad. ---------------
*
The only cryptic anagram in this group of four which refers to a
hypothetical future event is the third one. What does the Aussie
Moron do? He moves the text from one solved anagram to another.
Thus:
*
Bien des loys seront faictes ici pour
chasser le Président Chirac se vengeant tant bien
que mal à Paris, tuant les Arabes
qui a osé braver leur dernier Gihad
*
First, he does not realize that a plural subject calls for a
plural verb and that the deciphered text had its singular subject
in the third anagram calling for its singular verb in the fourth
anagram. But this is peanuts, compared to what comes next.
*
The ultimate stupidity of this insuperable moron is that, after
years of bitching against the *line-based* cryptic anagram, he
still has not grasped the notion that the cryptic anagram is...
line-based.
*
In other words, four lines of poetry yield four anagrams. Each
line is solved separately from the three others. No letter is
moved from one line to another. What does he do? He moves two
deciphered words from the second anagram to the third line, and
moves three deciphered words from the third anagram to the second
line.
*
But then again, I ought not to have expected anything intelligent
coming from him. All he has done so far in this NewsGroup is to
copy bits and pieces from Leoni and LeVert, repeat Lemesurier's
silly arguments, and attack each and every post I have authored.
And he gets paid for this?
*
Have a nice day, folks!
*
Claude Latrémouille
March 12, 2007
http://web.ncf.ca/cj559
*
=== ===
=== CLAUDE LATRÉMOUILLE ===
===========================
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Chirac non-event |
12 Mar 2007 05:17:16 PM |
|
|
On Mar 13, 4:30 am, (Claude Latremouille)
wrote:
*
On 11 Mar2007 14:56:03 -0700, "leigh8...@optusnet.com.au"
<leigh8...@optusnet.com.au> gave us a splendid demonstration of
his unfathomable stupidity.
*
It concerns a deciphered text from quatrain I-8. First, the
quatrain:
*
-------------- C E N T V R I E___P R E M I E R E. ------------
----------------------- (=E9dition de 1555) --------------------
*
----- 8 - Combien de foys prinse cit=E9 solaire ----------------
--------- Seras,changeant les loys barbares & vaines. --------
--------- Ton mal s'aproche:Plus seras tributaire ------------
--------- La grand Hadrie reourira tes veines. ---------------
*
And the deciphered text:
*
--------- Bien des loys seront faictes ici pour --------------
--------- chasser les Arabes se vengeant tant bien -----------
--------- que mal =E0 Paris, tuant le Pr=E9sident Chirac ---------
--------- qui a os=E9 braver leur dernier Gihad. ---------------
*
The only cryptic anagram in this group of four which refers to a
hypothetical future event is the third one. What does the Aussie
Moron do? He moves the text from one solved anagram to another.
Thus:
*> Bien des loys seront faictes ici pour
chasser le Pr=E9sident Chirac se vengeant tant bien
que mal =E0 Paris, tuant les Arabes
qui a os=E9 braver leur dernier Gihad
*
First, he does not realize that a plural subject calls for a
plural verb and that the deciphered text had its singular subject
in the third anagram calling for its singular verb in the fourth
anagram. But this is peanuts, compared to what comes next.
*
The ultimate stupidity of this insuperable moron is that, after
years of bitching against the *line-based* cryptic anagram, he
still has not grasped the notion that the cryptic anagram is...
line-based.
*
In other words, four lines of poetry yield four anagrams. Each
line is solved separately from the three others. No letter is
moved from one line to another. What does he do? He moves two
deciphered words from the second anagram to the third line, and
moves three deciphered words from the third anagram to the second
line.
*
But then again, I ought not to have expected anything intelligent
coming from him. All he has done so far in this NewsGroup is to
copy bits and pieces from Leoni and LeVert, repeat Lemesurier's
silly arguments, and attack each and every post I have authored.
And he gets paid for this?
*
Have a nice day, folks!
*
Claude Latr=E9mouille
March 12, 2007http://web.ncf.ca/cj559
*
=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D CLAUDE LATR=C9MOUILLE =3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D
"In other words, four lines of poetry yield four anagrams. Each
line is solved separately from the three others. No letter is
moved from one line to another. What does he do? He moves two
deciphered words from the second anagram to the third line, and
moves three deciphered words from the third anagram to the second
line. "
If you have not grasped it dearie it is you who is making stupid
schoolboy pranks or wanks check above for credibility you are the one
taking 30 words and making up anagrams from any text will do that with
those parameters.
The reason I post from Leoni et al is because believe it not they are
on to it.
They know methodology and seem to grasp the meanings quite easily.
Grow up & join the adults for a change.
Scholarship may be more laborious but is does pay off.
LB
.
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|