The Facts on armoured Humvees



 Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus > The Facts on armoured Humvees

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus
User: "TonyZ2001"
Date: 18 Dec 2004 08:33:00 AM
Object: The Facts on armoured Humvees
Under Clinton 385
Under Bush 15,000
Yet the Liberals want to blame President Bush.
Tony
.

User: "Doc"

Title: Re: The Facts on armoured Humvees 18 Dec 2004 03:54:50 PM
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041218093300.21787.00001873@mb-m12.aol.com...

Under Clinton 385

Under Bush 15,000

Yet the Liberals want to blame President Bush.

Tony

Jeez...should I even attempt this??? LOL...
When is your fucking leader, or leaders, going to take responsibility for
not adequately protecting the war vehicles the US troops use? When are you
screwheads who voted him back in admit this obvious, glaring reality?
Even Gen. Shwarzkopf admits it! He's not putting the blame on Clinton.
There was a massive 2002 military budget passed that should've earmarked
plenty of money for retro-fits and further armor on new vehicles.
Who pushed for that military bill to pass? HUH??? This administration!!!
There was plenty of time for adequately preparing the war vehicles for
this preemptive invasion, yet it was not done. Aside from the growing
questions regarding an under-sized US troop presence in Iraq, and
questions about human body armor, too, anyone with any fucking brains in
their heads can see this war was poorly planned, not to bring up once
again the fact that it was unnecessary.
;D
.
User: "Woodswun"

Title: Re: The Facts on armoured Humvees 18 Dec 2004 06:22:18 PM
In article <cq28vb02r03@enews2.newsguy.com>, "Doc" <goblowmoreshit@baboons.com> wrote:


"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041218093300.21787.00001873@mb-m12.aol.com...

Under Clinton 385

Under Bush 15,000

Yet the Liberals want to blame President Bush.

Tony


Jeez...should I even attempt this??? LOL...

When is your fucking leader, or leaders, going to take responsibility for
not adequately protecting the war vehicles the US troops use?

The Bush Administration's motto is "The buck stops elsewhere".
Woods
.


User: "WH"

Title: Re: The Facts on armoured Humvees 18 Dec 2004 09:59:03 AM
TonyZ2001 wrote:

Under Clinton 385

Under Bush 15,000

Yet the Liberals want to blame President Bush.

Tony

So which of these two d'ya s'pose is the warmonger?
WH
.
User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald"

Title: Re: The Facts on armoured Humvees 18 Dec 2004 12:06:00 PM
Clinton 11,900 + Innocent killed in Kosovo alone ( For no reason) - not
counting other small imperialist wars he began in American history.
So that is not warmongering? Tell me what is in comparison and cite
history as a fact to gauge this upon? ( Side note) Kosovo is in shamble
today and the UN has been disastrous administrating it.
.
User: "Woodswun"

Title: Re: The Facts on armoured Humvees 18 Dec 2004 12:09:31 PM
In article <1103393160.768557.131860@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, "Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote:

Clinton 11,900 + Innocent killed in Kosovo alone ( For no reason) - not
counting other small imperialist wars he began in American history.

So that is not warmongering? Tell me what is in comparison and cite
history as a fact to gauge this upon? ( Side note) Kosovo is in shamble
today and the UN has been disastrous administrating it.

No. Clinton actively resisted having any involvement in Kosovo, where it was
widely reported from numerous European sources that genocide was being committed
- but NATO begged us to help. Clinton ended up stating flatly that the US
wouldn't go in unless NATO did.
Bush, OTOH, made up stuff about Iraq and said outright that he'd invade with or
without help.
There is no comparison between the two situations whatsoever.
Woods
.
User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald"

Title: Re: The Facts on armoured Humvees 18 Dec 2004 02:02:23 PM
Clinton White House spinners stated 100-250 thousand people were being
genocide by Milo. This was a lie as Chinagate took over the media with
the Cox Report in late '98 into early 1999 0 that is until the Kosovo
War knocked this little high-treason issue out the media ( coverage)
window. Ironic that in December '98, Clinton had a private screening
of the movie ' wag the dog' lol.
BTW. UN in November 1999 came out saying that Milo. possibly only
killed under 2000 people in his 10 year -reign. He is still on trial
because of these lies. If he was really guilty of 100-250 thousand
people it would be in the major history books and he would be called a
little Hitler - But Clinton lied for selfish reason to cover up nuclear
proliferation.
All documented by the way ;)
.
User: "Doc"

Title: Re: The Facts on armoured Humvees 18 Dec 2004 03:27:45 PM
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1103400143.335559.53490@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

Clinton White House spinners stated 100-250 thousand people were being
genocide by Milo. This was a lie as Chinagate took over the media with
the Cox Report in late '98 into early 1999 0 that is until the Kosovo
War knocked this little high-treason issue out the media ( coverage)
window. Ironic that in December '98, Clinton had a private screening
of the movie ' wag the dog' lol.

BTW. UN in November 1999 came out saying that Milo. possibly only
killed under 2000 people in his 10 year -reign. He is still on trial
because of these lies. If he was really guilty of 100-250 thousand
people it would be in the major history books and he would be called a
little Hitler - But Clinton lied for selfish reason to cover up nuclear
proliferation.

All documented by the way ;)

Soooo...General Schwarzkopf's criticism of the Bush administration for the
lack of preparedness in protecting US troops must be politically
motivated, eh, *****-tard? ;D
Or...maybe the General's a traitor to conservatives and Republicans?
Could be another lefty plot! ;D


.




User: "Woodswun"

Title: Re: The Facts on armoured Humvees 18 Dec 2004 10:07:18 AM
In article <1103385542.982550.120490@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, "WH" <bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote:


TonyZ2001 wrote:

Under Clinton 385

Under Bush 15,000

Yet the Liberals want to blame President Bush.

Tony


So which of these two d'ya s'pose is the warmonger?

Exactly, there was no need for armored Humvees under Clinton.
Woods
.
User: "Hans D. Magnusson"

Title: Re: The Facts on armoured Humvees 18 Dec 2004 10:42:55 AM
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:WAYwd.7147$DQ3.6595@twister.nyroc.rr.com...

In article <1103385542.982550.120490@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, "WH"

<bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote:


TonyZ2001 wrote:

Under Clinton 385

Under Bush 15,000

Yet the Liberals want to blame President Bush.

Tony


So which of these two d'ya s'pose is the warmonger?


Exactly, there was no need for armored Humvees under Clinton.

The only thing he needed was rubber.

Woods

.
User: "R. Foreman"

Title: Re: The Facts on armoured Humvees 18 Dec 2004 08:09:49 PM
"Hans D. Magnusson" <hd@home.se> Spat the Words


"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:WAYwd.7147$DQ3.6595@twister.nyroc.rr.com...

In article <1103385542.982550.120490@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, "WH"

<bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote:


TonyZ2001 wrote:

Under Clinton 385

Under Bush 15,000

Yet the Liberals want to blame President Bush.

Tony


So which of these two d'ya s'pose is the warmonger?


Exactly, there was no need for armored Humvees under Clinton.


The only thing he needed was rubber.

And he didn't even really need that. :>
Monica was looking for a souvenir dress anyway... something
to stash away for posterity, you know, show to the grand-kids.


Woods




.

User: "Woodswun"

Title: Re: The Facts on armoured Humvees 18 Dec 2004 10:55:07 AM
In article <j6Zwd.11465$d5.100559@newsb.telia.net>, "Hans D. Magnusson" <hd@home.se> wrote:


"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:WAYwd.7147$DQ3.6595@twister.nyroc.rr.com...

In article <1103385542.982550.120490@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>, "WH"

<bollogs@hotmail.com> wrote:


TonyZ2001 wrote:

Under Clinton 385

Under Bush 15,000

Yet the Liberals want to blame President Bush.

Tony


So which of these two d'ya s'pose is the warmonger?


Exactly, there was no need for armored Humvees under Clinton.


The only thing he needed was rubber.

::coffee spew::
You gotta give us some warning, there, Hans. LOL!
Woods
.





  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER