http://atrios.blogspot.com/2007_04_15_atrios_archive.html#117701576506855501
Painful but informative to watch ... he looks like he's running the
country 'on the fly' without any real plan or even a clue.
Good luck.
-- Marvin
.
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fumbler in Chief |
20 Apr 2007 03:58:50 PM |
|
|
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvinparanoidandroid@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:1177098817.028349.32260@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
http://atrios.blogspot.com/2007_04_15_atrios_archive.html#117701576506855501
Painful but informative to watch ... he looks like he's running the
country 'on the fly' without any real plan or even a clue.
Good luck.
I wonder what the psychiatrists say about those that stutter so much, like
they're not telling the truth.
-- Marvin
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fumbler in Chief |
20 Apr 2007 04:07:23 PM |
|
|
On Apr 20, 4:58 pm, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvinparanoidandr...@hotmail.com> wrote in
messagenews:1177098817.028349.32260@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
http://atrios.blogspot.com/2007_04_15_atrios_archive.html#11770157650...
Painful but informative to watch ... he looks like he's running the
country 'on the fly' without any real plan or even a clue.
Good luck.
I wonder what the psychiatrists say about those that stutter so much, like
they're not telling the truth.
-- Marvin
They say that when you're alone with him and off the record he's very
bright, very articulate. I've seen that when they've done informal
fluff pieces, he seems pretty normal.
But there's pressure when you have to speak publicly, officially on
"weighty" matters.
It'll be interesting to see if the fumbling gets worse as things
continue to come undone and the pressure increases.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fumbler in Chief |
20 Apr 2007 05:04:29 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:07:23 -0700, John Lemke wrote:
On Apr 20, 4:58 pm, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvinparanoidandr...@hotmail.com> wrote in
messagenews:1177098817.028349.32260@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
http://atrios.blogspot.com/2007_04_15_atrios_archive.html#11770157650...
Painful but informative to watch ... he looks like he's running the
country 'on the fly' without any real plan or even a clue.
Good luck.
I wonder what the psychiatrists say about those that stutter so much, like
they're not telling the truth.
-- Marvin
They say that when you're alone with him and off the record he's very
bright, very articulate. I've seen that when they've done informal
fluff pieces, he seems pretty normal.
But there's pressure when you have to speak publicly, officially on
"weighty" matters.
It'll be interesting to see if the fumbling gets worse as things
continue to come undone and the pressure increases.
Something isn't right with him. Did you notice the size of those bags
under his eyes? Not the kind of bags/circles you get with sleep
deprivation, they were big and fat (and only one puffy set). Sleep
deprived bags are generally smaller and come in layers.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fumbler in Chief |
20 Apr 2007 06:16:57 PM |
|
|
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2007.04.20.22.04.24.610540@tepidmail.com...
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:07:23 -0700, John Lemke wrote:
On Apr 20, 4:58 pm, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvinparanoidandr...@hotmail.com> wrote
in
messagenews:1177098817.028349.32260@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
http://atrios.blogspot.com/2007_04_15_atrios_archive.html#11770157650...
Painful but informative to watch ... he looks like he's running the
country 'on the fly' without any real plan or even a clue.
Good luck.
I wonder what the psychiatrists say about those that stutter so much,
like
they're not telling the truth.
-- Marvin
They say that when you're alone with him and off the record he's very
bright, very articulate. I've seen that when they've done informal
fluff pieces, he seems pretty normal.
But there's pressure when you have to speak publicly, officially on
"weighty" matters.
It'll be interesting to see if the fumbling gets worse as things
continue to come undone and the pressure increases.
Something isn't right with him. Did you notice the size of those bags
under his eyes? Not the kind of bags/circles you get with sleep
deprivation, they were big and fat (and only one puffy set). Sleep
deprived bags are generally smaller and come in layers.
It's like a Star Trek episodes where the captain's gets taken over by
borgs. The crew don't know it's not really the captain!!
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "WH" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fumbler in Chief |
20 Apr 2007 06:14:46 PM |
|
|
On 21 Apr, 00:04, Woodswun <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:07:23 -0700, John Lemke wrote:
On Apr 20, 4:58 pm, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvinparanoidandr...@hotmail.com> wrot=
e in
messagenews:1177098817.028349.32260@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
http://atrios.blogspot.com/2007_04_15_atrios_archive.html#11770157650=
..=2E.
Painful but informative to watch ... he looks like he's running the
country 'on the fly' without any real plan or even a clue.
Good luck.
I wonder what the psychiatrists say about those that stutter so much, =
like
they're not telling the truth.
-- Marvin
They say that when you're alone with him and off the record he's very
bright, very articulate. I've seen that when they've done informal
fluff pieces, he seems pretty normal.
But there's pressure when you have to speak publicly, officially on
"weighty" matters.
It'll be interesting to see if the fumbling gets worse as things
continue to come undone and the pressure increases.
Something isn't right with him. Did you notice the size of those bags
under his eyes? Not the kind of bags/circles you get with sleep
deprivation, they were big and fat (and only one puffy set). Sleep
deprived bags are generally smaller and come in layers. =20
Woods- D=F6lj citerad text -
- Visa citerad text -
You trying to say he's back on the ***** then Woodsy?
WH
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fumbler in Chief |
20 Apr 2007 07:15:52 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:14:46 -0700, WH wrote:
On 21 Apr, 00:04, Woodswun <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:07:23 -0700, John Lemke wrote:
On Apr 20, 4:58 pm, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvinparanoidandr...@hotmail.com> wrote in
messagenews:1177098817.028349.32260@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
http://atrios.blogspot.com/2007_04_15_atrios_archive.html#11770157650...
Painful but informative to watch ... he looks like he's running the
country 'on the fly' without any real plan or even a clue.
Good luck.
I wonder what the psychiatrists say about those that stutter so much, like
they're not telling the truth.
-- Marvin
They say that when you're alone with him and off the record he's very
bright, very articulate. I've seen that when they've done informal
fluff pieces, he seems pretty normal.
But there's pressure when you have to speak publicly, officially on
"weighty" matters.
It'll be interesting to see if the fumbling gets worse as things
continue to come undone and the pressure increases.
Something isn't right with him. Did you notice the size of those bags
under his eyes? Not the kind of bags/circles you get with sleep
deprivation, they were big and fat (and only one puffy set). Sleep
deprived bags are generally smaller and come in layers.
Woods- Dölj citerad text -
- Visa citerad text -
You trying to say he's back on the ***** then Woodsy?
WH
Reports/rumors are that's the case, but I'm not sure if seriously hugs
bags under the eyes indicates that. I don't know a whole lot about
alcoholism/drinking. But it's gotta be an indication of something.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fumbler in Chief |
20 Apr 2007 07:26:25 PM |
|
|
On Apr 20, 8:15 pm, Woodswun <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:14:46 -0700, WH wrote:
You trying to say he's back on the ***** then Woodsy?
WH
Reports/rumors are that's the case, but I'm not sure if seriously hugs
bags under the eyes indicates that. I don't know a whole lot about
alcoholism/drinking. But it's gotta be an indication of something.
Woods
I would hope that if he has fallen off the wagon that someone would
intervene. We don't need broad denial at the highest levels of the
nation. The people enabling a drunk are just as sick as the drunk and
sooner or later everyone pays. What would that mean in the nation's
highest office? Don't think it would happen.
So if someone "spots" it, I hope they don't let it slide. We had
enough denial in the run up to the war. :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fumbler in Chief |
20 Apr 2007 09:18:14 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:26:25 -0700, John Lemke wrote:
On Apr 20, 8:15 pm, Woodswun <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:14:46 -0700, WH wrote:
You trying to say he's back on the ***** then Woodsy?
WH
Reports/rumors are that's the case, but I'm not sure if seriously hugs
bags under the eyes indicates that. I don't know a whole lot about
alcoholism/drinking. But it's gotta be an indication of something.
Woods
I would hope that if he has fallen off the wagon that someone would
intervene. We don't need broad denial at the highest levels of the
nation. The people enabling a drunk are just as sick as the drunk and
sooner or later everyone pays. What would that mean in the nation's
highest office? Don't think it would happen.
So if someone "spots" it, I hope they don't let it slide. We had
enough denial in the run up to the war. :-)
I dunno. I think it would be kind of entertaining to have him go off on
some drunken (or coked up) binge and attack the front wheels of Air Force
One with a golf club. ;-)
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fumbler in Chief |
20 Apr 2007 09:45:57 PM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, Woodswun
<woodswun@tepidmail.com> Spat the Words
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:26:25 -0700, John Lemke wrote:
On Apr 20, 8:15 pm, Woodswun <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:14:46 -0700, WH wrote:
You trying to say he's back on the ***** then Woodsy?
WH
Reports/rumors are that's the case, but I'm not sure if seriously hugs
bags under the eyes indicates that. I don't know a whole lot about
alcoholism/drinking. But it's gotta be an indication of something.
Woods
I would hope that if he has fallen off the wagon that someone would
intervene. We don't need broad denial at the highest levels of the
nation. The people enabling a drunk are just as sick as the drunk and
sooner or later everyone pays. What would that mean in the nation's
highest office? Don't think it would happen.
So if someone "spots" it, I hope they don't let it slide. We had
enough denial in the run up to the war. :-)
I dunno. I think it would be kind of entertaining to have him go off on
some drunken (or coked up) binge and attack the front wheels of Air
Force
One with a golf club. ;-)
Oh, that is *such* an evil thought, but god that would be funny.
I don't know if the country could recover though. We'd have to
start impeachment proceedings immediately.. dereliction of duty..
destruction of public property.. something like that.
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fumbler in Chief |
20 Apr 2007 10:39:39 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:18:14 -0400, Woodswun <woodswun@tepidmail.com>
wrote:
I dunno. I think it would be kind of entertaining to have him go off on
some drunken (or coked up) binge and attack the front wheels of Air Force
One with a golf club. ;-)
LOL! Imagine if he gave a speech while drunk? Oh I'd *pay* to watch
that! Actually...probably wouldn't be much different from the
speeches he gives now .. ;)
Dani
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fumbler in Chief |
20 Apr 2007 09:15:01 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 20:15:52 -0400, Woodswun <woodswun@tepidmail.com>
wrote:
Reports/rumors are that's the case, but I'm not sure if seriously hugs
bags under the eyes indicates that. I don't know a whole lot about
alcoholism/drinking. But it's gotta be an indication of something.
Well, bags under the eyes (in addition to the fact that he's a dry
alcoholic) could most certainly indicate that he's picked up again.
Once an alcoholic, always an alcoholic. Alcoholism is actually a
disease and there is no cure. Either one is an active alcoholic, or
they're a dry alcoholic. Dry alcoholics can't even take a *sip*
of alcohol to toast someone at his/her wedding. They can't casually
have a beer with a buddy. They have to completely abstain. If they
don't abstain, and think: "Ah, one beer won't do anything!" they are
very wrong.. and shortly thereafter they are drinking on a daily basis
and the alcohol has once again taken over their life.
Bush is a dry alcoholic.
Or it could be something completely different that is causing the
bags. But the suspicion that he's drinking again should definitely be
put high on the list of possible reasons for the bags.
Good observation, Woods.
Dani
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "mukyuk" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fumbler in Chief |
20 Apr 2007 10:40:28 PM |
|
|
"Dani" <d.b737@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:t0si23psqq0qhcnc88ee5m6kg3rvqpn2n0@4ax.com...
Once an alcoholic, always an alcoholic.
Once a pickle, there's no going back to a cucumbere!!
Dani
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fumbler in Chief |
20 Apr 2007 09:29:31 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:15:01 -0400, Dani wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 20:15:52 -0400, Woodswun <woodswun@tepidmail.com>
wrote:
Reports/rumors are that's the case, but I'm not sure if seriously hugs
bags under the eyes indicates that. I don't know a whole lot about
alcoholism/drinking. But it's gotta be an indication of something.
Well, bags under the eyes (in addition to the fact that he's a dry
alcoholic) could most certainly indicate that he's picked up again.
Okay, I didn't know that. I did notice those bags though - very
prominent, and he didn't used to have them when he first took office.
Once an alcoholic, always an alcoholic. Alcoholism is actually a
disease and there is no cure. Either one is an active alcoholic, or
they're a dry alcoholic. Dry alcoholics can't even take a *sip* of
alcohol to toast someone at his/her wedding. They can't casually have a
beer with a buddy. They have to completely abstain. If they don't
abstain, and think: "Ah, one beer won't do anything!" they are very
wrong.. and shortly thereafter they are drinking on a daily basis and
the alcohol has once again taken over their life.
Bush is a dry alcoholic.
Yes, I'd heard him referred to as that, but I thought that was a
derogatory term for someone who hadn't addressed their drinking problem,
but weren't drinking.
Woods
Or it could be something completely different that is causing the
bags. But the suspicion that he's drinking again should definitely be
put high on the list of possible reasons for the bags.
Good observation, Woods.
Dani
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fumbler in Chief |
20 Apr 2007 10:33:59 PM |
|
|
On Apr 20, 10:29 pm, Woodswun <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:15:01 -0400, Dani wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 20:15:52 -0400, Woodswun <woods...@tepidmail.com>
wrote:
Reports/rumors are that's the case, but I'm not sure if seriously hugs
bags under the eyes indicates that. I don't know a whole lot about
alcoholism/drinking. But it's gotta be an indication of something.
Well, bags under the eyes (in addition to the fact that he's a dry
alcoholic) could most certainly indicate that he's picked up again.
Okay, I didn't know that. I did notice those bags though - very
prominent, and he didn't used to have them when he first took office.
Once an alcoholic, always an alcoholic. Alcoholism is actually a
disease and there is no cure. Either one is an active alcoholic, or
they're a dry alcoholic. Dry alcoholics can't even take a *sip* of
alcohol to toast someone at his/her wedding. They can't casually have a
beer with a buddy. They have to completely abstain. If they don't
abstain, and think: "Ah, one beer won't do anything!" they are very
wrong.. and shortly thereafter they are drinking on a daily basis and
the alcohol has once again taken over their life.
Bush is a dry alcoholic.
Yes, I'd heard him referred to as that, but I thought that was a
derogatory term for someone who hadn't addressed their drinking problem,
but weren't drinking.
Woods
Or it could be something completely different that is causing the
bags. But the suspicion that he's drinking again should definitely be
put high on the list of possible reasons for the bags.
Good observation, Woods.
Dani
Woods
Regional semantics as opposed to clinical definitions perhaps. The
term "dry drunk" can be used for someone who isn't drinking but also
isn't dealing with the underlying issues of the disease. Folks can be
ornery, angry or in any other way as dysfunctional as they were when
they were drinking. A lot of alcoholic behaviour gets passed along to
the next generation this way.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fumbler in Chief |
20 Apr 2007 06:16:32 PM |
|
|
On Apr 20, 6:04 pm, Woodswun <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:07:23 -0700, John Lemke wrote:
On Apr 20, 4:58 pm, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvinparanoidandr...@hotmail.com> wrote in
messagenews:1177098817.028349.32260@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
http://atrios.blogspot.com/2007_04_15_atrios_archive.html#11770157650...
Painful but informative to watch ... he looks like he's running the
country 'on the fly' without any real plan or even a clue.
Good luck.
I wonder what the psychiatrists say about those that stutter so much, like
they're not telling the truth.
-- Marvin
They say that when you're alone with him and off the record he's very
bright, very articulate. I've seen that when they've done informal
fluff pieces, he seems pretty normal.
But there's pressure when you have to speak publicly, officially on
"weighty" matters.
It'll be interesting to see if the fumbling gets worse as things
continue to come undone and the pressure increases.
Something isn't right with him. Did you notice the size of those bags
under his eyes? Not the kind of bags/circles you get with sleep
deprivation, they were big and fat (and only one puffy set). Sleep
deprived bags are generally smaller and come in layers.
Woods
He's supposed to be in great health, I guess. He's supposed to have a
resting heart rate of 50 - 51. That's a marathon runner/long distance
cyclist's rate. Regular physicals and such so he should be on top of
things.
I feel sorry for him that he's under just a ton of pressure. But it's
self-inflicted. I wish he hadn't have fallen in with such a bad bunch.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fumbler in Chief |
20 Apr 2007 07:16:27 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:16:32 -0700, John Lemke wrote:
On Apr 20, 6:04 pm, Woodswun <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:07:23 -0700, John Lemke wrote:
On Apr 20, 4:58 pm, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvinparanoidandr...@hotmail.com> wrote in
messagenews:1177098817.028349.32260@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
http://atrios.blogspot.com/2007_04_15_atrios_archive.html#11770157650...
Painful but informative to watch ... he looks like he's running the
country 'on the fly' without any real plan or even a clue.
Good luck.
I wonder what the psychiatrists say about those that stutter so much, like
they're not telling the truth.
-- Marvin
They say that when you're alone with him and off the record he's very
bright, very articulate. I've seen that when they've done informal
fluff pieces, he seems pretty normal.
But there's pressure when you have to speak publicly, officially on
"weighty" matters.
It'll be interesting to see if the fumbling gets worse as things
continue to come undone and the pressure increases.
Something isn't right with him. Did you notice the size of those bags
under his eyes? Not the kind of bags/circles you get with sleep
deprivation, they were big and fat (and only one puffy set). Sleep
deprived bags are generally smaller and come in layers.
Woods
He's supposed to be in great health, I guess. He's supposed to have a
resting heart rate of 50 - 51. That's a marathon runner/long distance
cyclist's rate. Regular physicals and such so he should be on top of
things.
I feel sorry for him that he's under just a ton of pressure. But it's
self-inflicted. I wish he hadn't have fallen in with such a bad bunch.
I don't feel a bit sorry for him - I feel sorry for the rest of the planet
though!
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fumbler in Chief |
20 Apr 2007 07:31:52 PM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, Woodswun
<woodswun@tepidmail.com> Spat the Words
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:16:32 -0700, John Lemke wrote:
On Apr 20, 6:04 pm, Woodswun <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:07:23 -0700, John Lemke wrote:
On Apr 20, 4:58 pm, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvinparanoidandr...@hotmail.com>
wrote in
messagenews:1177098817.028349.32260@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
http://atrios.blogspot.com/2007_04_15_atrios_archive.html#
117701576
50...
Painful but informative to watch ... he looks like he's running
the country 'on the fly' without any real plan or even a clue.
Good luck.
I wonder what the psychiatrists say about those that stutter so
much, like they're not telling the truth.
-- Marvin
They say that when you're alone with him and off the record he's
very bright, very articulate. I've seen that when they've done
informal fluff pieces, he seems pretty normal.
But there's pressure when you have to speak publicly, officially on
"weighty" matters.
It'll be interesting to see if the fumbling gets worse as things
continue to come undone and the pressure increases.
Something isn't right with him. Did you notice the size of those bags
under his eyes? Not the kind of bags/circles you get with sleep
deprivation, they were big and fat (and only one puffy set). Sleep
deprived bags are generally smaller and come in layers.
Woods
He's supposed to be in great health, I guess. He's supposed to have a
resting heart rate of 50 - 51. That's a marathon runner/long distance
cyclist's rate. Regular physicals and such so he should be on top of
things.
I feel sorry for him that he's under just a ton of pressure. But it's
self-inflicted. I wish he hadn't have fallen in with such a bad bunch.
I don't feel a bit sorry for him - I feel sorry for the rest of the
planet though!
Woods
I was gonna say something similar. John is getting a bit
sensitive to feel sorry for Bush.
It may be sinking in for GWB that Congress really can
defund his little war.. Congress really does have the
power.. hence that 'fumbling' thing.
Very well could be back to drinking, even fighting with
Laura.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fumbler in Chief |
20 Apr 2007 08:08:42 PM |
|
|
On Apr 20, 8:31 pm, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
I was gonna say something similar. John is getting a bit
sensitive to feel sorry for Bush.
Just a quirk of mine. Hate to see people squirm. Could never stand
watching Mike Wallace make people squirm on 60 minutes. Can't stand
watching the NBC "To Catch a Predator" program even tho those slime
need to be made examples of and left swinging from a tree somewhere.
Good to have it air, I can't watch it.
George Bush has made an historic blunder. This will resonate thruout
what remaining history we have. He'll be shamed forever and as many
as a million or more people will end up dead or scarred because of it.
He was never qualified for the job.
He's deserves to receive a lot more trouble than he'll get and I
understand why people have no sympathy for him. I'm just a little
different in that regard, I guess.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fumbler in Chief |
20 Apr 2007 08:19:12 PM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, John Lemke <jflemke@locallink.net>
Spat the Words
On Apr 20, 8:31 pm, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
I was gonna say something similar. John is getting a bit
sensitive to feel sorry for Bush.
Just a quirk of mine. Hate to see people squirm. Could never stand
watching Mike Wallace make people squirm on 60 minutes. Can't stand
watching the NBC "To Catch a Predator" program even tho those slime
need to be made examples of and left swinging from a tree somewhere.
Good to have it air, I can't watch it.
George Bush has made an historic blunder. This will resonate thruout
what remaining history we have. He'll be shamed forever and as many
as a million or more people will end up dead or scarred because of it.
He was never qualified for the job.
He's deserves to receive a lot more trouble than he'll get and I
understand why people have no sympathy for him. I'm just a little
different in that regard, I guess.
Thank you John. At least you *have* a damn opinion. This is *more*
than I can say for our lurker robot-christian friend stevie douglas.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Lemke" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fumbler in Chief |
20 Apr 2007 10:50:16 PM |
|
|
On Apr 20, 9:19 pm, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
Thank you John. At least you *have* a damn opinion. This is *more*
than I can say for our lurker robot-christian friend stevie douglas.
So if you're lurking you're not posting then, eh? :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fumbler in Chief |
20 Apr 2007 11:20:12 PM |
|
|
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, John Lemke <jflemke@locallink.net>
Spat the Words
On Apr 20, 9:19 pm, Perseid <eidp...@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
Thank you John. At least you *have* a damn opinion. This is *more*
than I can say for our lurker robot-christian friend stevie douglas.
So if you're lurking you're not posting then, eh? :-)
Lurking is about the same as not posting anything meaningful.
I always get the feeling stevie is lying. He's here to promote
an agenda, but he refuses to interact in a real, meaningful way.
This is why he appears so robotic. You're just an object to him.
He doesn't regard you as a human, social animal.
Feel free to have compassion for him if you wish, but I'm through
with that. I've already wasted enough time with that. I might
taunt him here and there just for fun, but I won't put any more
effort into convincing him of something he is determined not to
believe.
I've tried, and because of that stevie knows why I hurl abuse
in his direction. I don't like getting lied to, and that's all
stevie does is lie.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fumbler in Chief |
20 Apr 2007 10:35:10 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 19:31:52 -0500, Perseid
<eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, Woodswun
<woodswun@tepidmail.com> Spat the Words
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:16:32 -0700, John Lemke wrote:
On Apr 20, 6:04 pm, Woodswun <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:07:23 -0700, John Lemke wrote:
On Apr 20, 4:58 pm, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvinparanoidandr...@hotmail.com>
wrote in
messagenews:1177098817.028349.32260@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
http://atrios.blogspot.com/2007_04_15_atrios_archive.html#
117701576
50...
Painful but informative to watch ... he looks like he's running
the country 'on the fly' without any real plan or even a clue.
Good luck.
I wonder what the psychiatrists say about those that stutter so
much, like they're not telling the truth.
-- Marvin
They say that when you're alone with him and off the record he's
very bright, very articulate. I've seen that when they've done
informal fluff pieces, he seems pretty normal.
But there's pressure when you have to speak publicly, officially on
"weighty" matters.
It'll be interesting to see if the fumbling gets worse as things
continue to come undone and the pressure increases.
Something isn't right with him. Did you notice the size of those bags
under his eyes? Not the kind of bags/circles you get with sleep
deprivation, they were big and fat (and only one puffy set). Sleep
deprived bags are generally smaller and come in layers.
Woods
He's supposed to be in great health, I guess. He's supposed to have a
resting heart rate of 50 - 51. That's a marathon runner/long distance
cyclist's rate. Regular physicals and such so he should be on top of
things.
I feel sorry for him that he's under just a ton of pressure. But it's
self-inflicted. I wish he hadn't have fallen in with such a bad bunch.
I don't feel a bit sorry for him - I feel sorry for the rest of the
planet though!
Woods
I was gonna say something similar. John is getting a bit
sensitive to feel sorry for Bush.
It may be sinking in for GWB that Congress really can
defund his little war.. Congress really does have the
power.. hence that 'fumbling' thing.
Very well could be back to drinking, even fighting with
Laura.
Look, I'm the type of person who can rationalize just about anything
and feel bad for just about anyone. I come off tough but I am *such*
a softie at times. I even feel a little bad for Steven even though I
can't fathom how he could support Bush and this war. But when I see
him getting ganged up on, ahhhhh, I feel a little bad.
That being said. There is not a fiber in my body that has an OUNCE
of pity for Dubya. Natta. Zip. Zero. Ziltch.
And coming from me, THAT is saying something because I can find good
in just about anyone. I see no good in that man. He has brought so
much pain and misery to so many people. And he did it all out in the
open with no shame. And he did it under the guise of benevolence.
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "Docrodile" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fumbler in Chief |
22 Apr 2007 05:25:04 AM |
|
|
"Dani" <d.b737@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:lv0j23tsf2udehvk0e6sqkrc21bqn5vm56@4ax.com...
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 19:31:52 -0500, Perseid
<eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, Woodswun
<woodswun@tepidmail.com> Spat the Words
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:16:32 -0700, John Lemke wrote:
On Apr 20, 6:04 pm, Woodswun <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:07:23 -0700, John Lemke wrote:
On Apr 20, 4:58 pm, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvinparanoidandr...@hotmail.com>
wrote in
messagenews:1177098817.028349.32260@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
http://atrios.blogspot.com/2007_04_15_atrios_archive.html#
117701576
50...
Painful but informative to watch ... he looks like he's running
the country 'on the fly' without any real plan or even a clue.
Good luck.
I wonder what the psychiatrists say about those that stutter so
much, like they're not telling the truth.
-- Marvin
They say that when you're alone with him and off the record he's
very bright, very articulate. I've seen that when they've done
informal fluff pieces, he seems pretty normal.
But there's pressure when you have to speak publicly, officially
on
"weighty" matters.
It'll be interesting to see if the fumbling gets worse as things
continue to come undone and the pressure increases.
Something isn't right with him. Did you notice the size of those
bags
under his eyes? Not the kind of bags/circles you get with sleep
deprivation, they were big and fat (and only one puffy set). Sleep
deprived bags are generally smaller and come in layers.
Woods
He's supposed to be in great health, I guess. He's supposed to have
a
resting heart rate of 50 - 51. That's a marathon runner/long
distance
cyclist's rate. Regular physicals and such so he should be on top of
things.
I feel sorry for him that he's under just a ton of pressure. But
it's
self-inflicted. I wish he hadn't have fallen in with such a bad
bunch.
I don't feel a bit sorry for him - I feel sorry for the rest of the
planet though!
Woods
I was gonna say something similar. John is getting a bit
sensitive to feel sorry for Bush.
It may be sinking in for GWB that Congress really can
defund his little war.. Congress really does have the
power.. hence that 'fumbling' thing.
Very well could be back to drinking, even fighting with
Laura.
Look, I'm the type of person who can rationalize just about anything
and feel bad for just about anyone. I come off tough but I am *such*
a softie at times. I even feel a little bad for Steven even though I
can't fathom how he could support Bush and this war. But when I see
him getting ganged up on, ahhhhh, I feel a little bad.
That being said. There is not a fiber in my body that has an OUNCE
of pity for Dubya. Natta. Zip. Zero. Ziltch.
And coming from me, THAT is saying something because I can find good
in just about anyone. I see no good in that man. He has brought so
much pain and misery to so many people. And he did it all out in the
open with no shame. And he did it under the guise of benevolence.
Dani
Whenever I hear that Stevie might be getting trounced by liberals too
heavily, I think back on the halcyon days of neocons, right wing
evangelicals, and Republicans having a virtual field day with liberals,
blowing the ***** and urine all over us, laughing in our faces, and calling
down Jesus regularly to spank our 'immoral' asses collectively -- and I
always want to remember that mean-spirited hatchet job on Kerry in 2004.
We've been through some of the ugliest political/social times humans could
suffer through that rival the rise of fascism in Europe in the 20s. There
were so many of these neocon maggots chewing on the flesh of liberals in
this forum for several years, and feeling great they had the majority
backing their fearless leader and his glorious war, that they simply went
ape-***** on us liberals, gleefully, in mobs, and constantly. Now, the tide
has turned. And if I feel Stevie wasn't a participating ape-***** in it, I'd
be forgetting his cozying up to anyone in this group that smelled like a
Bush supporter, neocon, right-wing Christian, etc. While not as rough as
some, Stevie was nevertheless there in the mob, if only to be holding the
hanging rope with a smirk on his glaze-eyed face.
Docrodile
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fumbler in Chief |
22 Apr 2007 11:56:40 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 03:25:04 -0700, "Docrodile"
<swampthing@hellsbayou.net> wrote:
"Dani" <d.b737@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:lv0j23tsf2udehvk0e6sqkrc21bqn5vm56@4ax.com...
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 19:31:52 -0500, Perseid
<eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, Woodswun
<woodswun@tepidmail.com> Spat the Words
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:16:32 -0700, John Lemke wrote:
On Apr 20, 6:04 pm, Woodswun <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:07:23 -0700, John Lemke wrote:
On Apr 20, 4:58 pm, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvinparanoidandr...@hotmail.com>
wrote in
messagenews:1177098817.028349.32260@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
http://atrios.blogspot.com/2007_04_15_atrios_archive.html#
117701576
50...
Painful but informative to watch ... he looks like he's running
the country 'on the fly' without any real plan or even a clue.
Good luck.
I wonder what the psychiatrists say about those that stutter so
much, like they're not telling the truth.
-- Marvin
They say that when you're alone with him and off the record he's
very bright, very articulate. I've seen that when they've done
informal fluff pieces, he seems pretty normal.
But there's pressure when you have to speak publicly, officially
on
"weighty" matters.
It'll be interesting to see if the fumbling gets worse as things
continue to come undone and the pressure increases.
Something isn't right with him. Did you notice the size of those
bags
under his eyes? Not the kind of bags/circles you get with sleep
deprivation, they were big and fat (and only one puffy set). Sleep
deprived bags are generally smaller and come in layers.
Woods
He's supposed to be in great health, I guess. He's supposed to have
a
resting heart rate of 50 - 51. That's a marathon runner/long
distance
cyclist's rate. Regular physicals and such so he should be on top of
things.
I feel sorry for him that he's under just a ton of pressure. But
it's
self-inflicted. I wish he hadn't have fallen in with such a bad
bunch.
I don't feel a bit sorry for him - I feel sorry for the rest of the
planet though!
Woods
I was gonna say something similar. John is getting a bit
sensitive to feel sorry for Bush.
It may be sinking in for GWB that Congress really can
defund his little war.. Congress really does have the
power.. hence that 'fumbling' thing.
Very well could be back to drinking, even fighting with
Laura.
Look, I'm the type of person who can rationalize just about anything
and feel bad for just about anyone. I come off tough but I am *such*
a softie at times. I even feel a little bad for Steven even though I
can't fathom how he could support Bush and this war. But when I see
him getting ganged up on, ahhhhh, I feel a little bad.
That being said. There is not a fiber in my body that has an OUNCE
of pity for Dubya. Natta. Zip. Zero. Ziltch.
And coming from me, THAT is saying something because I can find good
in just about anyone. I see no good in that man. He has brought so
much pain and misery to so many people. And he did it all out in the
open with no shame. And he did it under the guise of benevolence.
Dani
Whenever I hear that Stevie might be getting trounced by liberals too
heavily, I think back on the halcyon days of neocons, right wing
evangelicals, and Republicans having a virtual field day with liberals,
blowing the ***** and urine all over us, laughing in our faces, and calling
down Jesus regularly to spank our 'immoral' asses collectively -- and I
always want to remember that mean-spirited hatchet job on Kerry in 2004.
We've been through some of the ugliest political/social times humans could
suffer through that rival the rise of fascism in Europe in the 20s. There
were so many of these neocon maggots chewing on the flesh of liberals in
this forum for several years, and feeling great they had the majority
backing their fearless leader and his glorious war, that they simply went
ape-***** on us liberals, gleefully, in mobs, and constantly. Now, the tide
has turned. And if I feel Stevie wasn't a participating ape-***** in it, I'd
be forgetting his cozying up to anyone in this group that smelled like a
Bush supporter, neocon, right-wing Christian, etc. While not as rough as
some, Stevie was nevertheless there in the mob, if only to be holding the
hanging rope with a smirk on his glaze-eyed face.
I getchya! I just have a huge heart, ya gotta understand.
Dani
Docrodile
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fumbler in Chief |
22 Apr 2007 07:51:49 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 03:25:04 -0700, Docrodile wrote:
"Dani" <d.b737@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:lv0j23tsf2udehvk0e6sqkrc21bqn5vm56@4ax.com...
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 19:31:52 -0500, Perseid
<eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, Woodswun
<woodswun@tepidmail.com> Spat the Words
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:16:32 -0700, John Lemke wrote:
On Apr 20, 6:04 pm, Woodswun <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:07:23 -0700, John Lemke wrote:
On Apr 20, 4:58 pm, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvinparanoidandr...@hotmail.com>
wrote in
messagenews:1177098817.028349.32260@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
http://atrios.blogspot.com/2007_04_15_atrios_archive.html#
117701576
50...
Painful but informative to watch ... he looks like he's running
the country 'on the fly' without any real plan or even a clue.
Good luck.
I wonder what the psychiatrists say about those that stutter so
much, like they're not telling the truth.
-- Marvin
They say that when you're alone with him and off the record he's
very bright, very articulate. I've seen that when they've done
informal fluff pieces, he seems pretty normal.
But there's pressure when you have to speak publicly, officially
on
"weighty" matters.
It'll be interesting to see if the fumbling gets worse as things
continue to come undone and the pressure increases.
Something isn't right with him. Did you notice the size of those
bags
under his eyes? Not the kind of bags/circles you get with sleep
deprivation, they were big and fat (and only one puffy set). Sleep
deprived bags are generally smaller and come in layers.
Woods
He's supposed to be in great health, I guess. He's supposed to have
a
resting heart rate of 50 - 51. That's a marathon runner/long
distance
cyclist's rate. Regular physicals and such so he should be on top of
things.
I feel sorry for him that he's under just a ton of pressure. But
it's
self-inflicted. I wish he hadn't have fallen in with such a bad
bunch.
I don't feel a bit sorry for him - I feel sorry for the rest of the
planet though!
Woods
I was gonna say something similar. John is getting a bit
sensitive to feel sorry for Bush.
It may be sinking in for GWB that Congress really can
defund his little war.. Congress really does have the
power.. hence that 'fumbling' thing.
Very well could be back to drinking, even fighting with
Laura.
Look, I'm the type of person who can rationalize just about anything
and feel bad for just about anyone. I come off tough but I am *such*
a softie at times. I even feel a little bad for Steven even though I
can't fathom how he could support Bush and this war. But when I see
him getting ganged up on, ahhhhh, I feel a little bad.
That being said. There is not a fiber in my body that has an OUNCE
of pity for Dubya. Natta. Zip. Zero. Ziltch.
And coming from me, THAT is saying something because I can find good
in just about anyone. I see no good in that man. He has brought so
much pain and misery to so many people. And he did it all out in the
open with no shame. And he did it under the guise of benevolence.
Dani
Whenever I hear that Stevie might be getting trounced by liberals too
heavily, I think back on the halcyon days of neocons, right wing
evangelicals, and Republicans having a virtual field day with liberals,
blowing the ***** and urine all over us, laughing in our faces, and calling
down Jesus regularly to spank our 'immoral' asses collectively -- and I
always want to remember that mean-spirited hatchet job on Kerry in 2004.
And everyone who was not in lockstep with the neocon agenda was deemed a
"liberal".
We've been through some of the ugliest political/social times humans
could suffer through that rival the rise of fascism in Europe in the
20s. There were so many of these neocon maggots chewing on the flesh of
liberals in this forum for several years, and feeling great they had the
majority backing their fearless leader and his glorious war, that they
simply went ape-***** on us liberals, gleefully, in mobs, and constantly.
Now, the tide has turned. And if I feel Stevie wasn't a participating
ape-***** in it, I'd be forgetting his cozying up to anyone in this group
that smelled like a Bush supporter, neocon, right-wing Christian, etc.
While not as rough as some, Stevie was nevertheless there in the mob, if
only to be holding the hanging rope with a smirk on his glaze-eyed face.
Docrodile
The difference between then and now is that the non-neocons at the time
were showing some (fore)thought about the consequences of Bush's policies.
The current crop of fascists still clinging to Bush's (failed) policies
have seen the result of Bush's policies, and still support them, anyway,
regardless of how much it hurts America, Americans, or anyone else.
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fumbler in Chief |
20 Apr 2007 09:19:57 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 20:16:27 -0400, Woodswun <woodswun@tepidmail.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:16:32 -0700, John Lemke wrote:
On Apr 20, 6:04 pm, Woodswun <woods...@tepidmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:07:23 -0700, John Lemke wrote:
On Apr 20, 4:58 pm, "mukyuk" <a...@b.com> wrote:
"Marvin The Paranoid Android" <marvinparanoidandr...@hotmail.com> wrote in
messagenews:1177098817.028349.32260@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
http://atrios.blogspot.com/2007_04_15_atrios_archive.html#11770157650...
Painful but informative to watch ... he looks like he's running the
country 'on the fly' without any real plan or even a clue.
Good luck.
I wonder what the psychiatrists say about those that stutter so much, like
they're not telling the truth.
-- Marvin
They say that when you're alone with him and off the record he's very
bright, very articulate. I've seen that when they've done informal
fluff pieces, he seems pretty normal.
But there's pressure when you have to speak publicly, officially on
"weighty" matters.
It'll be interesting to see if the fumbling gets worse as things
continue to come undone and the pressure increases.
Something isn't right with him. Did you notice the size of those bags
under his eyes? Not the kind of bags/circles you get with sleep
deprivation, they were big and fat (and only one puffy set). Sleep
deprived bags are generally smaller and come in layers.
Woods
He's supposed to be in great health, I guess. He's supposed to have a
resting heart rate of 50 - 51. That's a marathon runner/long distance
cyclist's rate. Regular physicals and such so he should be on top of
things.
I feel sorry for him that he's under just a ton of pressure. But it's
self-inflicted. I wish he hadn't have fallen in with such a bad bunch.
I don't feel a bit sorry for him - I feel sorry for the rest of the planet
though!
He doesn't feel sorry for any single one of the MILLIONS of lives he's
ruined, how in God's name could I then ever feel sorry for him?
Ya give what ya get and ya get what ya give. And he's given nothing
but heartache and turmoil.
The ***** can rot.
Dani
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "eric" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fumbler in Chief |
20 Apr 2007 03:16:53 PM |
|
|
On Apr 20, 3:53 pm, Marvin The Paranoid Android
<marvinparanoidandr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
http://atrios.blogspot.com/2007_04_15_atrios_archive.html#11770157650...
Painful but informative to watch ... he looks like he's running the
country 'on the fly' without any real plan or even a clue.
Good luck.
-- Marvin
True...but Americans knew that when they elected him the first time.
They thought things were so good, the class clown could run the
country. Well the joke's on the idiots who voted for him. Even now,
Americans are too cowardly to impeach him. They have the government
they deserve.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fumbler in Chief |
20 Apr 2007 09:29:17 PM |
|
|
On 20 Apr 2007 13:16:53 -0700, eric <ericdavis500@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 20, 3:53 pm, Marvin The Paranoid Android
<marvinparanoidandr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
http://atrios.blogspot.com/2007_04_15_atrios_archive.html#11770157650...
Painful but informative to watch ... he looks like he's running the
country 'on the fly' without any real plan or even a clue.
Good luck.
-- Marvin
True...but Americans knew that when they elected him the first time.
They thought things were so good, the class clown could run the
country. Well the joke's on the idiots who voted for him. Even now,
Americans are too cowardly to impeach him. They have the government
they deserve.
Not ALL of us, eric. I did not vote for Bush; I can not STAND the
man, and I want no part of any of this. But, unfortunately I am
caught in the middle because I'm an American citizen.
All I ask is when you write posts such as this one above, remember the
Americans like John, Randy, Woods, Doc and myself who are vehemently
opposed to the *****. And the ones who voted for him? YES, utter
idiots. They should have their heads examined. And if *you* can't
stand the idiots who voted for him, just imagine my predicament. I'm
left suffering because of THEIR decision!
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "Docrodile" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fumbler in Chief |
22 Apr 2007 05:11:54 AM |
|
|
"Dani" <d.b737@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:4cti23di6thoa3lcegb1c6dhsnq7g76oal@4ax.com...
On 20 Apr 2007 13:16:53 -0700, eric <ericdavis500@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 20, 3:53 pm, Marvin The Paranoid Android
<marvinparanoidandr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
http://atrios.blogspot.com/2007_04_15_atrios_archive.html#11770157650...
Painful but informative to watch ... he looks like he's running the
country 'on the fly' without any real plan or even a clue.
Good luck.
-- Marvin
True...but Americans knew that when they elected him the first time.
They thought things were so good, the class clown could run the
country. Well the joke's on the idiots who voted for him. Even now,
Americans are too cowardly to impeach him. They have the government
they deserve.
Not ALL of us, eric. I did not vote for Bush; I can not STAND the
man, and I want no part of any of this. But, unfortunately I am
caught in the middle because I'm an American citizen.
All I ask is when you write posts such as this one above, remember the
Americans like John, Randy, Woods, Doc and myself who are vehemently
opposed to the *****. And the ones who voted for him? YES, utter
idiots. They should have their heads examined. And if *you* can't
stand the idiots who voted for him, just imagine my predicament. I'm
left suffering because of THEIR decision!
Dani
Yeah, that's right, and, furthermore, Eric, while I agree with you that it
is basically cowardice that keeps our Congress from going after him tooth
and nail (like for the non-usage of the review court for wiretap
authorization), it is also simple complacency in the populace stemming
from a fat-cow, feel-good, fantasy-filled, narcissistic economy. Strip the
money and goodies away, and I'd bet Americans would be heating up and
stirring the tar pots, and readying the feathers!
Congress has enough to start impeachment, and many of us old timers know
they want to use the anti-conservative turn-over to their political
advantage in the elections ahead. We've seen both sides exploit popular
public sentiments to their personal and collective advantages. So, what
else is new?
I look at all the joke-making and bitching about Bush-Cheney, and wonder
when it will finally don on most Americans that this 'entertainment' and
anger binge we're on is simply playing into the psychopaths' hands at the
top.
Docrodile
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fumbler in Chief |
20 Apr 2007 04:55:52 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:53:37 -0700, Marvin The Paranoid Android wrote:
http://atrios.blogspot.com/2007_04_15_atrios_archive.html#117701576506855501
Painful but informative to watch ... he looks like he's running the
country 'on the fly' without any real plan or even a clue.
Good luck.
-- Marvin
He looks like crap, and can't keep focused. I'm thinking the rumors of
him drinking again are probably true.
I don't know why CNN bothered to show this - it's painfully obvious that
the audience was hand picked and likely fed questions to ask (which
apparently is how Bush runs these things). It's not news, it's a
commercial.
I did find it somewhat amusing, in a revolting kind of way, that he's
referring to the Iraq war as the "Global War On Terror", which is
definitely is NOT.
Can't wait until January 2009!!
Woods
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
