| Topic: |
Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus |
| User: |
"Michael Cecil 28SW2" |
| Date: |
23 Oct 2003 04:24:27 PM |
| Object: |
The Judaeo-Christian Crusade Against Islam...And Terrorism |
--------------1A68AB2EE747D49F9F9D5ADC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Crusader Bush insists that the crusade against terrorism is not a
Crusade
against Islam. And, perhaps, it is more instructive to look upon the
crusade
against terrorism and the Crusade against Islam as independent entities
which, only periodically, share a common purpose. But, while the crusade
against terrorism appears to be losing both energy and focus; the Crus-
ade against Islam is, much more obviously, still going strong; given
mas-
sive infusions of both publicity and money by the politicians and
religious
and media officials.
Most Muslims, especially the Muslim 'jihadists', have never been
told--or
have long since forgotten--that the prophet Mohammed was sent primarily
for the purpose of correcting the errors of Jewish and Christian
theology
concerning both the identity of Jesus and the Doctrine of the
'resurrection'.
Thus, according to the Koran, the rabbis and their followers are in
error
for denying that Jesus was the 'M'essiah; the Christian theologians and
their followers are in error for asserting that Jesus is 'God'; and both
the
Jewish and Christian religious officials are in error for failing to
under-
stand that the Doctrine of the 'resurrection' is, instead, a Doctrine of
Re-
birth. (And it is at least debatable that the following several hundred
years
of Christian anti-Semitism resulting in the Holocaust would ever have
occurred had the Jews and Christians repented of their doctrinal errors
and acknowledged the Revelations received by Mohammed.) Thus, any
Jew who begins to consider that a human Jesus may very well have been
the 'M'essiah (irrespective of the lies of Christian theology); any
Christian
who begins to seriously question how it could be possible for a man to
be
'God'; and any student of the Eastern religions who begins to consider
that a Doctrine of Rebirth might also be found in the Prophets and the
Gospels is at least a potential convert to Islam...and, thus, a
potential threat
to the continued economic viability of Judaeo-Christianity, Inc.
Now, clearly, Judaeo-Christianity, Inc. has constructed a multi-billion
dollar religious 'empire' on the basis of doctrines specifically contra-
dicted by the Revelations received by Mohammed. Thus, there is no
chance at all that the Jewish and Christian religious officials will ac-
knowledge the reason for the arrival of Mohammed. And, obviously,
the Judaeo-Christian controlled religious as well as secular media
in the United States (and Israel) can be expected to censor and sup-
press any information which even so much as touches upon the
fundamental doctrinal errors of Jewish and Christian theology--thus, the
reason, for example, why you will not hear from the United States (or
Israeli) media any mention of the historical reason for the crucifixion
of
Jesus; namely, that he contradicted the Pharisaic interpretation of the
'resurrection' as a doctrine of the raising of a dead physical body from
the grave.
At the same time, however, neither are the Muslim religious officials
likely to emphasize the reasons for the arrival of Mohammed, since
their principal goal now appears to be defending themselves against
the charge of terrorism. In other words, it is because of this crusade
against terrorism that the fundamental Revelations received by Moham-
med have been 'pablumized' so as not to be in any way any threat what-
soever to Judaeo-Christian civilization. And it is at this point that
the
Crusade against Islam and the crusade against terrorism have a similar
goal. In other words, due to the efforts of not only Crusaders Bush &
Sharon and their minions, but also those in control of their respective
medias, the Judaeo-Christian Crusade against Islam is proceeding
quite successfully by utterly preventing any mention at all, much less
explanation, of the Revelations received by Mohammed specifically
directed at the lies of Jewish and Christian theology.
The simple fact of the matter is that Truth always constitutes a threat
to society constructed upon lies. Thus, the Revelations received by
Mohammed will always constitute a threat to a society constructed
on the lies of Jewish and Christian theology; which, of course, is also
the unspoken theological motivation behind the Judaeo-Christian
crusade against terrorism.
The politicians and the religious officials in the United States and
Israel,
with the active and enthusiastic participation of their respective
medias,
have succeeded quite admirably in shifting the focus of the public's
atten-
tion away from the Crusade against Islam and toward a crusade against
terrorism; a war which some have suggested is an 'eternal' war. But his-
tory has demonstrated that there is no effective response at all--other
than
violence and censorship--against those who speak the Truth: Jesus had
to be eliminated because he taught the Truth about the Doctrine of the
'resurrection'; the Albigensians had to be exterminated by the tens of
thousands because they taught a similar Doctrine of Rebirth; and, now,
every Muslim religious official must continually defend himself against
the accusation of terrorism so as to prevent him from speaking those
Truths which strike at the very foundation of Judaeo-Christian theology.
And the censorship and propaganda unleashed by the Judaeo-Chris-
tian fascists against the Revelations received by Mohammed--coupled
with the violence unleashed by the Judaeo-Christian countires against
the Muslim countries--have together created a situation in which Truth
is being, for all practical purposes, exterminated from the face of the
earth.
But the expected future of a civilization which thrives upon the exter-
mination of the Truth--a civilization which is willing to sacrifice
every-
thing to preserve the economic interests of its religious officials--is
particularly bleak.
See my web page for a detailed description of the Knowledge that has
been rejected and the Teaching that has been forgotten by the Jewish,
Christian and Muslim religious officials. (cf. Hosea 4:4-6 and Daniel
12:9-10):
http://www.deadseanaghammadiresearch.com
Michael Cecil
--------------1A68AB2EE747D49F9F9D5ADC
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Crusader Bush insists that the crusade against terrorism is not a Crusade
<br>against Islam. And, perhaps, it <b>is</b> more instructive to look
upon the crusade
<br>against terrorism and the Crusade against Islam as independent entities
<br>which, only periodically, share a common purpose. But, while the crusade
<br>against terrorism appears to be losing both energy and focus; the Crus-
<br>ade against Islam is, much more obviously, still going <b>strong; </b>given
<b>mas-</b>
<br><b>sive </b>infusions of both publicity and money by the politicians
and religious
<br>and media officials.
<p>Most Muslims, especially the Muslim 'jihadists', have never been told--or
<br>have long since forgotten--that the prophet Mohammed was sent primarily
<br>for the purpose of correcting the <b>errors </b>of Jewish and Christian
theology
<br>concerning both the identity of Jesus and the Doctrine of the 'resurrection'.
<p>Thus, according to the Koran, the rabbis and their followers are in
error
<br>for denying that Jesus was the 'M'essiah; the Christian theologians
and
<br>their followers are in error for asserting that Jesus is 'God'; and
both the
<br>Jewish <b>and</b> Christian religious officials are in error for failing
to under-
<br>stand that the Doctrine of the 'resurrection' is, instead, a Doctrine
of Re-
<br>birth. (And it is at least debatable that the following several hundred
years
<br>of Christian anti-Semitism resulting in the Holocaust would <b>ever</b>
have
<br>occurred had the Jews and Christians repented of their doctrinal errors
<br>and acknowledged the Revelations received by Mohammed.) Thus, any
<br>Jew who begins to consider that a human Jesus may very well have been
<br>the 'M'essiah (irrespective of the lies of Christian theology); any
Christian
<br>who begins to seriously question how it could be possible for a man
to<b> be</b>
<br>'God'; and any student of the Eastern religions who begins to consider
<br>that a Doctrine of Rebirth might also be found in the Prophets and
the
<br>Gospels is at least a potential convert to Islam...and, thus, a potential
threat
<br>to the continued economic viability of Judaeo-Christianity, Inc.
<p>Now, clearly, Judaeo-Christianity, Inc. has constructed a multi-billion
<br>dollar religious 'empire' on the basis of doctrines specifically contra-
<br>dicted by the Revelations received by Mohammed. Thus, there is no
<br>chance at all that the Jewish and Christian religious officials will
ac-
<br>knowledge the reason for the arrival of Mohammed. And, obviously,
<br>the Judaeo-Christian controlled religious as well as secular media
<br>in the United States (and Israel) can be expected to censor and sup-
<br>press any information which even so much as <b>touches</b> upon the
<br>fundamental doctrinal errors of Jewish and Christian theology--thus,
the
<br>reason, for example, why you will not hear from the United States (or
<br>Israeli) media any mention of the historical reason for the crucifixion
of
<br>Jesus; namely, that he contradicted the Pharisaic interpretation of
the
<br>'resurrection' as a doctrine of the raising of a dead physical body
from
<br>the grave.
<p>At the same time, however, neither are the Muslim religious officials
<br>likely to emphasize the reasons for the arrival of Mohammed, since
<br>their principal goal now appears to be defending themselves against
<br>the charge of terrorism. In other words, it is because of this crusade
<br>against terrorism that the fundamental Revelations received by Moham-
<br>med have been 'pablumized' so as not to be in <b>any</b> way <b>any</b>
threat what-
<br>soever to Judaeo-Christian civilization. And it is at this point that
the
<br>Crusade against Islam and the crusade against terrorism have a similar
<br>goal. In other words, due to the efforts of not only Crusaders Bush
&
<br>Sharon and their minions, but also those in control of their respective
<br>medias, the Judaeo-Christian <b>Crusade </b>against Islam is proceeding
<br>quite successfully by utterly preventing any mention at all, much less
<br>explanation, of the Revelations received by Mohammed specifically
<br>directed at the <b>lies</b> of Jewish and Christian theology.
<p>The simple fact of the matter is that Truth<b> </b>always constitutes
a threat
<br>to society constructed upon lies. Thus, the Revelations received by
<br>Mohammed will <b>always</b> constitute a threat to a society constructed
<br>on the lies of Jewish and Christian theology; which, of course, is
also
<br>the unspoken theological motivation behind the Judaeo-Christian
<br>crusade against terrorism.
<p>The politicians and the religious officials in the United States and
Israel,
<br>with the active and enthusiastic participation of their respective
medias,
<br>have succeeded quite admirably in shifting the focus of the public's
atten-
<br>tion <b>away</b> from the Crusade against Islam and toward a crusade
against
<br>terrorism; a war which some have suggested is an 'eternal' war. But
his-
<br>tory has demonstrated that there is no effective response at all--other
than
<br>violence and censorship--against those who speak the Truth: Jesus had
<br>to be eliminated because he taught the Truth about the Doctrine of
the
<br>'resurrection'; the Albigensians had to be exterminated by the tens
of
<br>thousands because they taught a similar Doctrine of Rebirth; and, now,
<br>every Muslim religious official must continually defend himself against
<br>the accusation of terrorism so as to<b> prevent</b> him from speaking
those
<br>Truths which strike at the very foundation of Judaeo-Christian theology.
<br>And the censorship and propaganda unleashed by the Judaeo-Chris-
<br>tian fascists against the Revelations received by Mohammed--coupled
<br>with the violence unleashed by the Judaeo-Christian countires against
<br>the Muslim countries--have together created a situation in which Truth
<br>is being, for all practical purposes, exterminated from the face of
the
<br>earth.
<p>But the expected future of a civilization which <b>thrives</b> upon
the exter-
<br>mination of the Truth--a civilization which is willing to sacrifice
<b>every-</b>
<br><b>thing</b> to preserve the economic interests of its religious officials--is
<br>particularly bleak.
<p>See my web page for a detailed description of the Knowledge that has
<br>been rejected and the Teaching that has been forgotten by the Jewish,
<br>Christian and Muslim religious officials. (cf. Hosea 4:4-6 and Daniel
<br>12:9-10):
<p><a href="http://www.deadseanaghammadiresearch.com">http://www.deadseanaghammadiresearch.com</a>
<p>Michael Cecil
<br> </html>
--------------1A68AB2EE747D49F9F9D5ADC--
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Judaeo-Christian Crusade |
24 Oct 2003 07:22:05 PM |
|
|
Mohammed the Writer~to what end?
=A0=A0~what was his life like and to what end his writing...............
~Jai Maharaj writes on this topic:
Prophet of Terror and the Religion of Peace--Part I Mohammed, Prophet of
Islam is known as the "Apostle of Peace" by Muslims. Nothing can be
further from the truth. This article is just one of a series that I will
be publishing regarding sadistic cruel nature of Prophet Mohammed. In
this article I will prove once again, that Mohammed was in fact a
terrorist, criminal and murderer whose entire life was based on
victimizing innocents and indulging in mindless violence, carnage and
massacre. He was a man who destroyed peace wherever he went, and in its
place brought terror, carnage and death.
When Mohammed first started screaming from the rooftops that he alone
had the divine word of God, the people of Mecca ignored him. However,
when he started insulting and defaming the religion of the peace loving
Meccans, they couldn't take it anymore and tried persuading him to stop.
Mohammed the coward was too scared of the growing hostility against him
and instead of calling upon his Allah to strike down the Meccans, he
crept out one night and fled for his life. Ever since that incident,
Mohammed was determined to take revenge on the Meccans. He escaped to
Medinah, which had a sizeable Jewish population, and started plotting
his revenge with a small gang of criminals. This was the beginning of
Mohammed's trail of violence, hatred and bloodshed that would soon
destroy the once flourishing culture of Arabia. The story has been
documented in detail by his biographers, - surprise raids on trade
caravans and tribal settlements, the use of plunder thus obtained for
recruiting an ever growing army of greedy desperados, assassinations of
opponents, blackmail, expulsion and massacre of the Jews of Medinah,
attack and enslavement of the Jews of Khayber, rape of women and
children, sale of these victims after rape, trickery, treachery and
bribery employed to their fullest extent to grow the numbers of his
religion Islam which ironically was supposed to mean "Peace"! He
organised no less than 86 expeditions, 26 of which he led himself. The
motives of the converts to Islam was never in any doubt. As D.S.
Margoliouth states in his book Muhammad and the rise of Islam "Of any
moralising or demoralising effect that Muhammad's teaching had upon his
followers we cannot say with precision. When he was at the head of the
Robber community, it is probable that the demoralising influence began
to be felt; it was then that men who had never broken an oath learnt
that they might evade their obligations, and that men to whom the blood
of their clan had been as their own, began to shed it with impunity in
the "cause of god". And that lying and treachery in the cause of Islam
received divine approval. It was then too that Moslems became
distinguished by the obscenity of their language. It was then too, that
the coveting of goods and wives possessed by Non-muslims was avowed
without discouragement from the Prophet...." The details of all his
criminal onslaughts in the form of battles and assasinations are
chronicled in this article in a chronological manner. One should note
that everytime the "Apostle of Peace" committed one of his criminal
onslaughts, he always justified the crimes by quickly claiming a "divine
revelation" which conveniently removed the blame from his bloodied
hands. These convenient Suras are detailed immediately below the
description of the incident.
1) Massacre of unarmed merchants during sacred month Date: Late
January(Rejeb), 623 A.D. Place: Nakhla Victims: 4 Merchants from Quraysh
tribe of Mecca, the Tribe to which Mohammed himself belonged Four
UNARMED merchants were travelling to Mecca to sell their goods
consisting of raisins, honey and animal skins. It was the holy month of
Rejeb which was considered sacred for trade in Arabia. It was a point of
honor that any form of warfare or violence was strictly forbidden in
this month. Mohammed's gang attacked the helpless men from behind and
stabbed two of them to death. They plundered all the goods as booty and
Mohammed got one fifths of the share.
This shows the utter lack of morals or scruples on Mohammed's part. The
Prophet of Islam did not possess a shred of pity or kindness, or the
slightest sense of justice. He cold-bloodedly murdered two innocent
people who had never done him any harm and did not even know him! All
this was done in a month that the Prophet himself declared was a sacred
month in which no warfare should take place. Mohammed was obviously
motivated by nothing but hatred and greed.
Conveniently divine revelations came down from Allah that absolved him
of all the guilt.
Koran 2:216
"Warfare is ordained for you, though it is hateful unto you; but it may
happen that you hate a thing which is good for you and it may happen
that you love a thing which is bad for you. Allah knoweth, you knew
not."
Here Mohammed is completely removing all blame from himself, for having
started the fighting. The most insidious and devilish implication of
this verse is that Allah is completely justifying Mohammed's murder of
the innocent Meccans. Over and above this Mohammed is conveniently
implying that warfare is hateful to him, but he participated in it
because it was ordained by Allah! What sacrifices the "Apostle of Peace"
had to make!
Koran 2:217
"They question you (O Mohammed) with regard to warfare in the sacred
month. Say: Warfare therein is a great transgression but to turn men
from the way of Allah and to disbelive in Him and the inviolable place
of worship and to expel its people thence is a greater transgression,
for persecution is worse than killing"
Here Allah is clearly saying that to kill or create warfare in the
sacred month of Rejeb is a very grave offence, but to justify his own
violation of Allah's rules, Mohammed comes up with the idea that since
the people killed were unbelievers, it was perfectly okay! The reason
given for the horrific murder of the innocent Meccans, is the fact that
they did not believe in Mohammed's version of God. How much more
tolerant and kind could the "Great Prophet" be!
2) Slaughter of Meccans who came to defend their caravans Date: March
(Ramadan) 17, 623 A.D Place: The well of Badr Victims: 70 merchants from
Quraysh Tribe of Mecca, The Quraysh army which came to defend them The
merchandise being carried by this caravan was worth more than 50,000
Gold Dinars. Mohammed ganged up all the criminals of Medina and set out
to raid the caravan with 300 men. The Meccans got word of the raid and
sent out an army to protect the caravan. Throughout the entire battle
Mohammad cowered in a hut which his men made for him. There he cried and
prayed with feverish anxiety. At one point he came out of the hut and
threw pebbles in the enemy's direction, screaming "Let evil look on your
faces!" and "By him who holds my soul in his hands, anyone who fights
for me today will go to paradise!" The Muslims killed over two hundred
and took seventy prisoners. All seventy of the prisoners were ransomed,
and any prisoner who did not fetch a ransom had his head chopped off.
Mohammed was gratified at the sight of his murdered victims. After the
battle, he sent his followers to look for the corpse of Abu Jahal, one
of the Meccans who had criticised him openly. When his corpse was
found,they cut off the head and threw it down at Mohammed's feet. The
"Apostle of peace" cried out in delirious joy, "Rejoice! Here lies the
head of the enemy of Allah! Praise Allah, for there is no other but he!"
The Prophet then ordered a great pit to be dug for the bodies of the
innocents to be dumped. The Muslims then proceeded to hack the corpses
limbs into pieces. As the bloodied mass of bodies was being thrown into
the pit, a feverishly excited Mohammed shreiked, " O People of the Pit,
have you found that what Allah threatened is true now? For I have found
that what my Lord promised was true! Rejoice All Muslims!" One of the
prisoners taken was the defiant Al Nadr Ibn al Harith, who had earlier
taken Muhammad's challenge of telling better stories than him. Muhammad
ordered Ali to strike off Nadr's head in his presence, so he could watch
and exult in the pleasure of beheading the man who had insulted him.
Another prisoner Uqba ibn Abi Muait was decapitated in front of the
Prophet. Before being killed the prisoner cried out pitifully "O
Prophet, who will look after my children if I should die?" The "Great
Prophet of the Religion of Peace" coldly spat out "Hellfire", as the
blade came down and spattered his clothes with Uqba's blood. This time
Mohammed needed a revelation that would not only absolve him of all the
guilt for murdering so many innocent people, but also give him the
"divine" right to get a huge share of the plundered booty. Quite a few
revelations magically appeared after the battle of Badr. Koran 8:65 "O
Prophet exhort the believers to fight. If there be of you 20
steadfast,they will overcome 200 and if there be of you a 100, they
shall overcome a 1000, because the disbelievers are a folk without
intelligence"
This Sura clearly exposes Islam to be a religion that not only
encourages violence but actually makes it a sacred duty for Muslims to
kill anyone who does not believe in the Muslim version of religion. Not
only is the "All forgiving Allah" exhorting his followers to kill anyone
who is not Muslim, but he is also saying that all non-Muslims are so
stupid that they will be unable to defend themselves and therfore
deserve death!
Koran 8:67-68
"It is not for any Prophet to have captives until he hath made slaughter
in the land. You desire the lure of this world and Allah desires for you
the hereafter and Allah is Mighty, Wise.. Now enjoy what you have won as
lawful and good and keep your duty to Allah. Lo! Allah is forgiving,
merciful."
This verse is in reference to the prisoners that Mohammed held for
ransom after the battle. Allah the "Merciful" is saying that they should
all have been killed! In addition, Allah is conveniently commenting that
whatever loot Mohammed has plundered is "lawful and good" because it was
done in service to Allah. So murder, rape, plunder and destruction are
all perfectly fine with Allah as long as they are done in the name of
Islam! Mohammed is also insidiously making himself seem very kind for
having spared the lives of the prisoners, when in fact he only let them
live so he could get more money from the Ransom for them. In today's
world this is called "Terrorism" of the worst kind.
3) Assasination of poets who criticised Mohammed's murderous ways Date:
Late March-April, 623 A.D Place: Medinah Victims: Two of the most famous
poets of Medinah, who had the courage to criticise the murderous actions
of Mohammed and his gang After the battle of Badr, the people of Medinah
were horrified that they had given refuge to such a blatant criminal and
his followers in their city. Many began protesting the presence of such
violent and murderous people in their city. In a free society like
Pre-Islamic Arabia, the poets acted as society's conscience and were
free to criticise, satirize and examine the actions of people. The two
most famous poets of this kind were Abu 'Afak; an extremely old and
respected poet and Asma bint Marwan; a young mother with the gift of
superb verse. Muhammad was enraged at their criticism. When he heard the
verses composed by Asma Bint Marwan he was infuriated and screamed
aloud, "Will no one rid me of this daughter of Marwan!" That very night
a gang of Muslims set out to do the dirty deed. They broke into the
poets' house. She was lying in in her bedroom suckling her newborn
child, while her other small children slept nearby. The Muslims tore the
newborn infant off her breast and hacked it to pieces before her very
eyes. They then made her watch the murder of all four of her children,
before raping and then stabbing her repeatedly to death. After the
murder when the Muslims went to inform the Prophet, he said "You have
done a service to Allah and his Messenger, her life was not worth even
two goats!" A month later the distinguished and highly respected Abu
Afak, who was over a hundred years old and reknowned for his sense of
fairness, was killed brutally in the same manner as he slept. Once again
the Prophet had commented that morning "Who will avenge me on this
scoundrel!" This shows us exactly how much the tolerant and peace loving
Prophet respected life. Muslims claim that Mohammed was extremely gentle
and loved children. Indeed the horrifying way he had Asma Bint Marwan's
five infants slaughtered certainly attests to this "loving" side of the
Prophet.
4) The Siege of the Banu Qaynuqa
Date: April, 623 A.D
Place: Medinah
Victims: The Jewish Tribe of Banu Qaynuqa
In order to get full control of Medinah, Mohammed needed to get rid of
all his opponents. The strongest of these opponents was Abdallah Ibn
Ubayy, a powerful chief who was allied with the Jewish Tribe of Banu
Qaynuqa. This tribe was also the weakest, because they were made up of
craftsmen, in particular goldsmiths. By attacking them, Mohammed knew he
could plunder a huge amount of wealth and weaken Ibn Ubayy. Mohammed
needed an excuse to attack them so he made a girl married to one of his
followers, pretend that she had been teased by the Jews. The Muslims
blockaded the fort of the Banu Qaynuqa for fifteen days until the
starving Jews surrendered. Immediately, the Prophet was ready to kill
them all, but Ibn Ubayy seized hold of Mohammed and protested.
Mohammed's face became black with rage as he shouted "Let go of me", but
Ibn Ubayy was adamant and shouted back "No, by God, I will not let you
go until you deal kindly with my allies. 400 men without armour and 300
with, who have always supported me against enemies. And you want to slay
them all in one morning! By God, If I were in your place I would fear a
reversal of fortune"
At this threat, the cowardly Mohammed turned pale, as he realised that
all the people of Medinah were against him. He hit Ibn Ubayy on the face
and ordered that the Jews be kicked out of their own homes. All their
property was seized and looted, many of the prettiest women were taken
as prisoners to become sex-slaves. Mohammed kept one-fifths of the
enormous booty for himself. This is the way he repayed the kindness of
the Jews of Medina, who had given him shelter and a refuge, when
Mohammed had run away from Mecca in fear.
The revelations in the Eighth Sura of the Koran were clearly in
reference to the Banu Qaynuqa and anyone who opposed the Muslims. (Koran
8:55-57)
"Lo, the worst of beasts in Allah's sight are the ungrateful who will
not believe."
"Those of them with whom you made a treaty and then at every opportunity
they break their treaty and they keep not duty to Allah, If you come on
them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are
behind them, so that they may remember."
Here Mohammed's acts of planned terrorism against the Jewish Tribe is
justified by Allah, because according to the "Merciful" Allah,
Non-Muslims are the worst of BEASTS! So it is perfectly all right to
murder, rape, torture and pillage the non-believers! Not only that but
Allah is advising Mohammed and the Muslims that when anyone protests
against the injustices committed by Muslims, the Muslims should make
sure and deal with them with such violence, that it will strike fear
among anyone who may think of supporting dissent. This proves that the
Koran is nothing but a political manual for controlling people with
terror. Not even the fascist armies of Hitler engineered such devilish
ideas.
The above are just a few of the incidents that demonstrate the
intolerant and merciless nature of the inhuman acts committed by
Mohammed and the Muslims. Further articles in this series will reveal
more of Prophet Mohammed's heinous, sadistic and cruel crimes against
humanity.
Note: Works of Abdullah Yusuf Ali, Muhammed Marmaduke Pickthall,
Rodinson, Martin Lings have been used in this article. Back To Main Page
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Stephen Cooper" |
|
| Title: Re: The Judaeo-Christian Crusade Against Islam...And Terrorism |
23 Oct 2003 04:30:58 PM |
|
|
Michael Cecil (28SW2) wrote:
<snipped junk>
Michael, what do you think about the sacrifices in the OT? What do you
think they were for?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: ~Truth about Mohammed the Writer Thief,Playboy/Gigolo BiblePlagiarist |
24 Oct 2003 07:14:41 PM |
|
|
Mohammed wrote his own "Gospel" and so could you also write a number of
verses plagiarized "lifted" stolen from the Bible~What was he and his
life like.....
Myth #5
Mohammed was a Holy Man?
Mohammed's Sexual Excesses -- Mohammed's Greed for Wealth -- Mohammed's
Penchant for Violence -- In Contrast - The Goodness and Purity of Christ
It would be the expectation of most people that a person who was a
prophet of God would be a person of high moral integrity, one who served
and lived for his God. Throughout the Bible, for instance, we see
example after example of men who were God-called prophets who, despite
their human failings, were men of great faithfulness to the Lord and who
had placed their full faith and trust in Him. We see men like John the
Baptist, Jeremiah, Isaiah, Daniel, and many others who fit the bill as
far as living a holy life before God is concerned. Islam teaches and
makes the same claims for the man whom it considers to be the final
prophet of Allah, Mohammed.
"Such was our Holy Prophet Muhammed (peace be upon him). He was a
prodigy of extraordinary merits, a paragon of virtue and goodness, a
symbol of truth and veracity, a great apostle of God, His messenger to
the entire world. His life and thought, his truth and
straightforwardness, his piety and goodness, his character and morals,
his ideology and achievements - all stand as unimpeachable proofs of his
prophethood. Any human being who studies his life and teachings without
bias will testify that verily he was the True Prophet of God and the
Qur'an - the Book he gave to mankind - the true book of God. No unbiased
and serious seeker of truth can escape this conclusion." 1
We would therefore expect that an examination of the life and teachings
of Mohammed would back up this very laudatory view of this man. So, what
DOES the life and teachings of Mohammed indicate about this man's
charactre. Does he really fit the qualifications for a man whom a holy
God would use to serve as His prophet? God wants for servants people who
will keep themselves clean and pure in His sight. "Depart ye, depart ye,
go ye out from thence, touch no unclean thing; go ye out of the midst of
her; be ye clean that bear the vessels of the LORD." (Isaiah 52:11).
Mohammed's Sexual Excesses
In studying the life of Mohammed in an unbiased, factual way free of
blind adoration for the man, we see that Mohammed did not fit
thdescription of a man keeping himself pure before God. In fact, his
whole life was that of a man living to fulfill his lusts and desires,
living a self-centred life at the expense of those who got in his way.
This is perhaps not more clearly shown than in his manifested weakness
for women. The Qur'an in Surah 4:3 limits a man to four wives, but
Mohammed went well beyond this limit. Mohammed took to himself 16 wives
through formal marriage. In addition, he kept two women as
slave-concubines, and had four devout Muslim women who "gave" themselves
to Mohammed as acts of devotion. The complete list of Mohammed's women
is below.
Mohammed's Women
1 - Khadija Bibi
2 - Sawda
3 - Ayesha
4 - Omm Salama
5 - Hafsa
6 - Zaynab of Jahsh
7 - Jowayriya
8 - Omm Habiba
9 - Safiya
10 - Maymuna of Hareth
11 - Fatima
12 - Hend
13 - Asma of Saba
14 - Zaynab of Khozaymah
15 - Habla
16 - Asma of Noman
17 - Mary the Coptic Christian (concubine)
18 - Rayhana (concubine)
19 - Omm Sharik (devotee)
20 - Maymuna (devotee)
21 - Zaynab (origin unknown, devotee)
22 - Khawla (devotee)
Some notes ought to be made concerning some of these women. His first
wife, Khadija Bibi, was his employer while he was still a caravan
driver. She was his senior by 15 years, and many indications seem to
show that she proposed to him, unusual for Arabian society at the time,
but less so when the man was in an inferior social and economic
situation to the woman 2. His sixth wife, Zaynab of Jahsh was originally
the wife of his adopted son, Zayd. However, Mohammed became smitten with
Zaynab, and Zayd offered to divorce her so that she could marry
Mohammed. This was carried out, and caused great scandal among the early
Muslim followers until Mohammed had a timely revelation.
"Behold! Thou didst say to one who had received the grace of Allah and
thy favor: "Retain thou thy wife, and fear Allah." But thou didst hide
in thy heart that which Allah was about to make manifest: thou didst
fear the people, but it is more fitting that thou shouldst fear Allah.
Then when Zaid had dissolved with her, We joined her in marriage to
thee: in order that there may be no difficulty to the Believers in
marriage with the wives of their adopted sons, when the latter have
dissolved with them. And Allah's command must be fulfilled." (Surah
33:37)
Poof! Problem solved, and it suddenly became acceptable for men to marry
the wives of their sons. Interestingly, it is in this same surah that
Mohammed was given a special exemption from the four-wives limit imposed
earlier (Surah 33:50).
Mohammed's seventeenth woman, Mary, was a Coptic Christian who was given
to Mohammed as a gift from the ruler of Egypt. Bravely refusing to
renounce her Coptic Christianity and accept Islam, she refused to marry
him, and instead remained his slave. Perhaps most disturbing of all of
Mohammed's relations with women is his taking of his third wife, Ayesha.
She was six years of age when he "married" her, nine when he consummated
the relationship, and she remained his favourite wife throughout the
rest of his life. When he died at the age of 62, she was a mere 17 years
old. This episode in Mohammed's life points to very distressing
paedophilic tendencies in the man.
Mohammed's actions give every indication that he was a man driven by his
lust for women. Witness his attitude towards a woman named Duba Bint
Amr, who "was among the most beautiful of Arab women....her hair was
long enough to cover all her body". Mohammed asked her son if he could
marry her, but then retracted the offer after finding out that though
she was beautiful, she was also aging 3. In contradiction to the Muslim
claim that Mohammed married many of his women out of a charitable desire
to protect widows, we see that he was merely interested in their
physical beauty and ability to retain that beauty for his enjoyment.
Also, Mohammed advocated marrying women for their wealth, beauty, and
for conversion efforts. "A woman can be married for religion, her
fortune, or her beauty. So marry one for the religion." 4 Apparently
"love" or "God's will" don not factor into the equation. This also
tellingly reveals the reason why so many Muslim men marry non-Muslim
women in the West. It's easier to influence a woman towards Islam when a
man is married to her, as she seeks to please her husband, and in part
explains the greatly unequal rates of conversion to Islam by Western
women over Western men.
Of course, no exposition of Mohammed's perverse attitude towards
sexuality would be complete without a look at his version of "Paradise"
that would make Hugh Hefner blush with shame. Muslim men are promised 72
young virgins for perpetual enjoyment. For the sake of propriety, I
won't include the quotes, but this all is right there in the Qur'an, in
Surat 37:40-48, 44:51-55, 52:17-20, 55:56-58, 70-77, 56:7-40, and 78:31.
Additionally, sodomy with young boys plays a role in the Muslim paradise
(Surat 52:24, 56:17, and 76:19) with these boys being described using
much the same language as was employed to describe the virgins. Of
course, Islam's paradise has plenty of wine, wealth, and food for the
enjoyment of those who have passed on. Mohammed was a man for whom the
fulfillment of bodily pleasures was of paramount, and some would say,
consuming importance.
Mohammed's Greed for Wealth
In addition to a lust for women, Mohammed also had a lust for wealth.
This first seems to have manifested itself early in life. After growing
up in the fashion of many young Meccan boys, as a poor shepherd, when he
was 25 years of age, Mohammed followed the advice of his uncle Abu Talib
and hired on as a caravanserai in the employ of a rich widow named
Khadija. He accompanied her caravan as far as Syria, and apparently did
such a good job of making money for her that upon his return to Mecca,
she extended a proposal of marriage to him. He accepted, despite the
fact that she was at least fifteen years his senior, and had been
married twice before. Her great personal wealth and position as owner of
a prosperous caravan likely did much to overcome his natural aversion to
what would have been severe drawbacks for marriage in Arabian culture at
the time.
This claim, that Mohammed had a greed for wealth, is confirmed by his
actions later in life, many of which were carried out with the
assistance and acceptance of his Muslim followers. In 623 AD, Mohammed's
career in caravan piracy began. Late in that year, several of his Muslim
followers, acting upon his orders, ambushed and looted a small Meccan
caravan. In this raid, one Meccan was killed, two others taken as
slaves, and a sizeable amount of booty captured 5. Emsboldened by this
success, Mohammed next personally led a raid on the main caravan of the
Meccan Quraysh tribe, returning from Syria. In this raid, he led 305 men
and was engaged in battle at Badr by a Meccan force of 800-900, with the
outcome being a Muslim win. While this Muslim victory was a
comparatively small fracas, it is heralded as one of the greatest
victories in history by many Muslim historians. The Muslims considered
it a miracle from Allah, and viewed it as giving sanction to their
piracy. Practically speaking, the victory did provide them with much
booty in the form of slaves, horses, camels, and military equipment,
which was to prove useful in the years to come.
Because of this battle, and their piracy, Mohammed and the Muslims
became a stench in the nostrils of the Meccans and others with
commercial interests in the region. Thus, in 625, the Meccans sent an
army numbering about 3,000 against Medina, the city where Mohammed and
the Muslims had fled to when they escaped from Mecca several years
before. Mohammed elected to meet this army on the field of battle, and
the Muslims were seriously defeated, with Mohammed himself being wounded
and sent fleeing from the battlefield. Because of internal dissentions,
the Meccans failed to follow up on their advantage and pursue the
Muslims. Two years later, though, they returned and attempted to lay
siege to Medina. Being forewarned of the Meccan return, Mohammed acted
upon the advice of a Persian friend and ordered a ditch dug around the
weaker defence quarters of Medina as protection. This artifice,
previously unknown in Arabia, hindered the Meccans and their allies, who
lifted the siege and departed 6.
After this "victory" Mohammed and the Muslims became encouraged, and
stepped up their raiding behaviour. Many Bedouin tribes were drawn to
the Muslim circle by the military victories and prospects of treasure,
adding their strength to Mohammed's. It was at this time that Mohammed
finished the expulsion of the several Jewish tribes from Medina, and
expropriated their lands and properties for himself and his followers.
Victory over Mecca was finally obtained in 630 AD. Using an
insignificant incident to provoke a clash of arms, Mohammed led his
followers against Mecca, this just a year after Mohammed had signed a
ten year peace treaty with that city. The Meccans, who were recognising
the solidification of Mohammed's power and the ascendancy of his arms,
folded with barely a fight, and the Muslims entered victoriously into
the city. As a result of these years of piracy, Muhammed had amassed
great personal wealth and power, and Arab tribes from all over the
peninsula flocked to him.
During the course of all this fighting and raiding, Mohammed and his
Muslim followers developed a love for fighting and loot which came from
the life of piracy.
"When he was at the head of a robber community (in Medina) it is
probable that the demoralizing influence began to be felt; it was then
that men who had never broken an oath learned that they might evade
their obligations, and that men to whom the blood of the clansmen had
been as their own began to shed it with impunity in the cause of God;
and that lying and treachery, in the cause of Islam, received divine
approval, hesitation to perjure oneself in that cause being represented
as a weakness. It was then, too, that Moslems became distinguished by
the obscenity of their language. It was then, too, that the coveting of
goods and wives (possessed by unbelievers) was avowed without
discouragement from the prophet." 7
What honour these men had from their previous upbringing in the culture
of Arabic tradition, what morality they may have engendered from their
traditional raising, slowly eroded as the sin in their lives increased
and increased. As they became increasingly hardened in their hearts, and
their consciences seared, crimes which would before have been
unthinkable to them gradually became commonplace.
Islam as a vehicle to wealth and power is clearly demonstrated. Muhammed
himself received, by "divine" decree, a fifth of all booty captured in
war,
"To whichever village you go and settle therein, there is your share
therein, and whichever village disobeys Allah and His Messenger, its
one-fifth is for Allah and His Messenger and the remainder is for you."
8
The rest, of course, went to the Muslim followers who took part in
battle. Hence, it was good money to be in the business of warfare as a
Muslim. After conquest, Islam was further strengthened by the "three
choices" option imposed upon conquered peoples. Subject nations were
offered one of three choices: Accept Islam and become members of Dar
es-Salaam; pay the jizyah, the unbelievers tax; or death 9. Either way,
Islam benefited materially. Unbelievers either became Muslims and
contributed to the enhancement of Islamic warmaking, booty-gathering,
and social strength; or they became direct sources of revenue for
Islamic states; or else they ceased to be "in the way" of Islam's
expansion. Mohammed and his religion's attraction to wealth truly bears
witness to the Biblical record found in I Timothy 6:10, "For the love of
money is the root of all evil...".
Mohammed's Penchant for Violence
As was alluded to above, the lifestyle of looting and pillaging took men
who were already accustomed to violence and hardship, and made them even
more wicked and depraved in their violent deeds. The violence which we
see in Islam and which has been previously expounded on, did not arise
without a source, this being Mohammed and the early Muslim leadership.
It was from their example that Muslims learned the ways of violence,
murder, and subjugation.
Mohammed was a violent man. As with other pagan war leaders of his day,
it was not merely enough to defeat and control an enemy. After defeating
one Jewish town, Mohammed ordered the beheading of all the adult males
in the place, numbering anywhere from 700-1000 individuals. The women
and children were sold into slavery, and the town looted 10. Muslim
tradition also recounts that upon taking Mecca, Mohammed ordered the
death of a poetess of the city, Asma daughter of Marwan, who had
ridiculed him and who had pointed out that some of the material in the
Qur'an had actually been stolen from her father, also a poet, and used
by Mohammed. The traditions relate this story as follows,
"The Apostle of Allah said, 'Who will rid me of the daughter of Marwan?'
"
Upon hearing this, the Companion Umair ibn Udaj went to her house and
killed her, reporting back to Mohammed of the deed the next day. It is
then recorded,
"Then in the morning he was with the Apostle of Allah and said to him,
'O Apostle of Allah, verily I have killed her.' Then (Mohammed) said,
'Thou hast helped Allah and His Apostle, O Umair!' "11
Thus, this "prophet" ordered the death of a woman because of personal
vendetta and to protect himself from charges of plagiarism!
Mohammed one time ordered the death of an old man who mocked the Muslim
pride in their dirty foreheads. Muslims in Mohammed's day were proud of
their method of prayer, placing their foreheads directly in the dirt.
The elderly man, mockingly suggesting that there was more to prayer than
mere outward form (having a dirty forehead), took some dirt, spread it
on his own forehead, and stated that this was good enough for him.
Mohammed ordered his Muslim followers to murder the old man, which they
did 12. Certain of the ahadith are full of instances where Mohammed
ordered opponents and those with whom he had personal grudges to be
killed 13. One example in particular shows Mohammed's penchant for
wickedness as he pressed his revenge. The traditions record the fate of
a certain Arabian Jew of the tribe of the Bene Nadir named Ka'b ibnu'l
Ashraf who was believed to have been conspiring against Mohammed's life,
as well as singing insulting songs about Muslim women. For these
offences,
"The Messenger of Allah said: 'Who will kill Ka'b ibnu'l Ashraf? He has
maligned Allah, the Exalted, and His Messenger!'" (This was after the
Muslims apparently were in control of the war situation.) "Muhammad ibn
Maslama said: 'Messenger of Allah, do you wish that I should kill him?'
He said: 'Yes" ... so Muhammad ibn Maslama came to Ka'b and pretended to
be a dissident of Islam to gain his confidence. He asked for the loan of
foodstuffs. It was agreed upon to pledge the weapons in exchange.
Muhammad ibn Maslama promised that he would return with three (four)
friends. That night they went. When his wife heard them, she exclaimed:
"I hear a voice which sounds like the voice of murder", but Ka'b
quietened her and went down to them. Muhammad (ibn Maslama) said to his
companions: "As he comes down, I will extend my hands towards his head
and when I hold him fast, you should do your job.'" They conversed about
the "very fine smell" of the scent of his hair. Being allowed to smell
his hair, he held his head fast" and said to his companions: 'Do your
job.' And they killed him." 14
Ibn Hisham, the early Muslim biographer, relates another aspect of this
story in which young Ibn Maslama to carry out his great service to Allah
with Mohammed's prodding,
"All that is incumbent upon you is that you should try. 'He said: 'O
Apostle of God, we shall have to tell lies.' He answered: 'Say what you
like, for you are free in the matter.' So lies and deception were used.
Mohammed accompanied them for a while and blessed them in parting: 'Go
in God's name; O God help them.' After having seized the locks of Ka'b
he said: "'Smite the enemy of Allah'. Accordingly they smote him. Their
swords came in collision with one another and effected nothing. Muhammad
ibn Maslama said: 'Then I recalled to mind my dagger ... I seized it.
The enemy of Allah cried out with such a cry, that around us there
remained not a stronghold on which a fire was not kindled. Then I stuck
it into his abdomen, then I pressed upon it till it reached his
genitals, and the enemy of Allah fell.' In the grappling with the swords
one of the companions was wounded. They carried him back to Mohammed who
was - "standing praying. We saluted him, and he came out to us. We
informed him of the killing of the enemy of Allah. He spat upon our
comrade's wound, and went back." The laconic end of the story goes like
this: 'Our attack upon God's enemy cast terror among the Jews, and there
was no Jew in Medina who did not fear for his life.' "15
Ibn Ishaq further elaborates this point, noting that Mohammed used this
as an excuse to stir up his Muslim followers against the Jews,
"the Apostle of Allah said, 'Kill any Jew that falls into your power.'
"16
Thus, it may be seen from whence the foundation of anti-Semitism was
lain in Islam. Mohammed's personal dislike for the Jews resulted in the
condemnation of this group to death, a point which to this day still
bears its evil fruit in the attitudes and behaviour of orthodox Islam.
This particular point of anti-Semitism, further, was just one symptom of
the chronically violent and revengeful nature of Mohammed.
In Contrast - The Goodness and Purity of Christ
Having examined the life of Mohammed, it can be pretty clearly seen that
he could not be a man of God, at least not of a holy God who demands
that His servants keep themselves unspotted from the world (James 1:27).
In contrast, though, we can see the testimony of the goodness, upright
charactre, and perfection of the Lord Jesus Christ, who was more than a
prophet, but was indeed the sinless Son of God. No record anywhere,
either biblical or secular, has ever recorded a single misdeed committed
by the Lord.
The scribes and Pharisees and other socio-political leaders of the Jews
in Jesus' day could find no fault in Him. Despite the very public nature
of His ministry, which lasted for three years, during which time He was
under the watchful eye of all those leaders who hated Him and wanted to
destroy Him, these enemies of Christ were still completely unable to lay
anything to His charge. He asked them, "Which of you convinceth me of
sin?" (John 8:46). All they could do was mock and insult him, which has
always been the last resort of those who know they have not a leg to
stand on against an enemy. When the religious leaders of the Jews
captured the Lord in the garden of Gethsemane and took Him before the
chief priest, Jesus said, "..If I have spoken evil, bear witness of the
evil: but if well, why smitest thou me?" (John 18:23) Jesus spoke no
evil, nor could these enemies of the Lord find any truthful accusation
to make against Him. Instead, they had to try to falsely accuse Him on
trumped up charges.
"Now the chief priests, and elders, and all the council, sought false
witness against Jesus to put him to death; But found none: yea, though
many false witnesses came, yet found they none...." (Matthew 26:59-60)
They could find no false witnesses who could produce (quite literally)
any evidence against the Lord's charactre, righteousness, or
truthfulness. As the Bible records in Mark 14:56, "For many bare false
witness against him, but their witness agreed not together." Their
"witnesses" against the Lord could not even get their own stories
straight, and their lack of truth was exposed immediately!
The secular authorities found no fault in the Lord Jesus either, there
was nothing which Herod or Pilate could lay to His account. After being
questioned by Herod, who could make no judgment on Him, Jesus was sent
to the Roman governour Pilate. After being questioned, Pilate pronounced
his own judgment on the matter of Jesus. "Then said Pilate to the chief
priests and to the people, I find no fault in this man." (Luke 23:4)
Even the man who betrayed the Lord Jesus, this being Judas, acknowledged
the purity of the Lord. "Then Judas, which had betrayed him, when he saw
that he was condemned, repented himself, and brought again the thirty
pieces of silver to the chief priests and elders. Saying, I have sinned
in that I have betrayed the innocent blood..." (Matthew 27:3-4) After
realising that Jesus was condemned to die, Judas realised the magnitude
of his crime, that he had just handed over the most innocent man who had
even walked the earth, one who had done nothing to deserve death or
punishment.
Jesus Christ, the Son of God, was recognised as speaking with authority
by those who heard Him and saw His miracles and His purity. "And he
charged them that they should tell no man: but the more he charged them,
so much the more a great deal they published it; And were beyond measure
astonished, saying, He hath done all things well: he maketh both the
deaf to hear, and the dumb to speak." (Mark 7:36-37) Also, "And they
were astonished at his doctrine: for he taught them as one that had
authority, and not as the scribes." (Mark 1:22) The Lord Jesus Christ
was so gracious in word, so powerful in deed, and so righteous in life,
that He was the standard which put the religious leaders and
self-righteous Pharisees to shame. Jesus spoke as one with authority,
which He indeed was, as He is God Incarnate. His sinless perfection
demonstrates His charactre as Very God. "Let no man say when he is
tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil,
neither tempteth he any man." (James 1:13). Christ was, is, and always
will be sinless, as He was, is, and always will be God, which cannot
sin. Christ endured 40 days of temptation in the desert, under the
duress of hunger and solitude, from Satan, the master tempter, himself,
and passed this test with flying colours. Matthew 4:1-11 and Luke 4:1-13
record in-depth the temptation of and successful resisting of that
temptation by the Lord Jesus Christ.
Even the Qur'an bears witness to the sinless perfection of Christ. In
Surah 19:19, the angel speaks to Mary concerning her son to be born,
Jesus. "He said: 'Nay, I am only a messenger from thy Lord, (to
announce) to thee the gift of a pure son.'" Muslims, both from the
record of their own book, and from the record of the holy Scriptures of
the Bible, which they are bound by the Qur'an to accept, must
acknowledge and admit the sinless, perfect purity of the Lord Jesus
Christ!
Thus, we see between Islam's Mohammed and the Lord Jesus Christ a sharp
contrast. On the one hand, Mohammed, a man who killed, fornicated,
coveted, and betrayed the trust of those with whom he had made a pact of
peace. On the other hand, the Lord Jesus Christ, whom nobody, not even
His bitterest enemies, could lay a charge to His account. While Mohammed
went out to make war, Jesus Christ came from God to make peace, peace
between sinful man and the holy God. "And all things are of God, who
hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ..." (II Corinthians 5:18).
The record is clear, and the observer can clearly see which it was that
was of God, this being Jesus Christ.
End Notes
(1) - S. Abul Ala Maudadi, Towards Understanding Islam, p. 78
(2) - S.N. Fisher, The Middle East, a History. p. 30
(3) - Ibn Saad, Al-Tabaqat, p. 153
(4) - Abu Issa al-Tarmidi, Sunan al-Tarmidi, lib. IV, no. 1092, p.275
(5) - S.N. Fisher, The Middle East, a History, p.38
(6) - S.N. Fisher, The Middle East, a History, p.39
(7) - D.S. Margoliouth, Mohammed and the Rise of Islam, p.109
(8) - Mishkat Vol. 2, p. 412
(9) - T.P. Hughes, A Dictionary of Islam, p. 243
(10) - Ali Dashti, 23 Years: A Study of the Prophetic Career of
Mohammed, pp. 88-91.
(11) - Mishkat, Vol. IV, p. 995
(12) - Sahih al-Bukhari,vol. 2, no. 173
(13) - see Sahih al-Bukhari,vol. 3, no. 72; vol. 3, no. 687; vol. 3, no.
829
(14) - Sahih Muslim, Vol. III, pp. 990-991
(15) - Ibn Hisham, Siratu'l Rasul, vss. 550-553
(16) - Ibn Ishaq, Siratu'l Rasul, v. 553
Return to the Introductory Page and Table of Contents
Go Back to Myth #4 - Muslims Reverence Jesus Christ --
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
