The new and improved Democrat racism


 Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus > The new and improved Democrat racism

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 2 of 2

1
 

2
 
Topic: Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus
User: "TonyZ2001"
Date: 09 Dec 2004 05:27:06 AM
Object: The new and improved Democrat racism
The new and improved Democrat racism
Posted: December 8, 2004
7:00 p.m. Eastern
2004 Universal Press Syndicate
Still furious about the election, liberals are lashing out at blacks. First it
was Condoleezza Rice. But calling a Ph.D. who advised a sitting president
during war "Aunt Jemima" apparently hasn't satiated the Democrats' rage. Even
the racist cartoons didn't help.
So this week, they've turned with a vengeance to Clarence Thomas. Only the
Democrats would try to distract from their racist attacks on one black
Republican by leveling racist attacks against a different black Republican. If
Democrats don't nip this in the bud, soon former Klanner and Democratic Sen.
Bob Byrd will be their spokesman.
In the past few weeks, there have been nasty insinuations all around about
Condoleezza Rice's competence for the job.
Democratic consultant Bob Beckel – who demonstrated his own competence
running Walter Mondale's campaign – said of Rice, "I don't think she's up to
the job."
Joseph Cirincione, with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (so you
know they don't have an agenda or anything), said Rice "doesn't bring much
experience or knowledge of the world to this position." This was reassuring,
inasmuch as that was also liberals' assessment of the current president before
he took office and he, to put it mildly, has been doing rather well.
The Kansas City Star editorialized that Rice "has not demonstrated great
competence in the last four years," which is to say, Dr. Rice failed to be
sufficiently clairvoyant to predict the events of Sept. 11, 2001.
Columnist Bob Herbert sneered of Rice's nomination in the New York Times:
"Competence has never been highly regarded by the fantasists of the George W.
Bush administration." For example, these are the bumbling nitwits who conquered
Afghanistan, the "graveyard of empires," and toppled Baghdad in less time than
your average Jennifer Lopez marriage lasts. (Wait, I can't remember: Was it the
Bush administration that hired Jayson Blair?)
So far, Dr. Rice has demonstrated her abundant competence only in academia,
geopolitics, history, government, college administration, classical music and
athletics. I eagerly await the Bob Herbert column in which he lists the
subjects and pursuits he's mastered. If only Rice talked about her
accessorizing like Clinton's Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, she might
impress the sort of fellow who writes for the New York Times.
Liberals at least give white Republicans credit for being evil. Rumsfeld is a
dangerous warmonger, Paul Wolfowitz is part of an international Jewish
conspiracy, ***** Cheney is "Dr. No." But Dr. Rice? She's a dummy.
In fact, after spending the last four years telling us that President Bush was
an empty suit, a vessel for neoconservative fantasies of perpetual war,
liberals have now found someone who is Bush's puppet: the black chick.
It's all so eerily familiar.
The late Mary McGrory, a white liberal, called Scalia "a brilliant and
compelling extremist" – as opposed to McGrory herself, a garden-variety
extremist of average intelligence. But Thomas she dismissed as "Scalia's
puppet," quoting another white liberal, Alvin J. Bronstein of the American
Civil Liberties Union, to make the point. This is the kind of rhetoric liberals
are reduced to when they just can't bring themselves to use the n-word.
Most recently – at least as we go to press – last Sunday Harry Reid, the
Democratic leader in the Senate, had this to say about Justice Clarence Thomas:
"I think that he has been an embarrassment to the Supreme Court. I think that
his opinions are poorly written." You'd think Thomas' opinions were written in
ebonics.
In the same interview, Reid called Justice Antonin Scalia "one smart guy." He
said that although he disagreed with Scalia, his reasoning is "very hard to
dispute." Scalia is "one smart guy"; Thomas is the janitor. If Democrats are
all going to read from the same talking points, they might want to get someone
other than David Duke to write them.
On the Sean Hannity radio show, Democratic pundit Pat Halpin defended Sen.
Reid's laughable attack on Thomas by citing Bob Woodward's book "The Brethren,"
which – according to Halpin – vividly portrays Thomas as a nincompoop.
I return to my standing point that liberals don't read. Harry Reid clearly
hasn't read any of the decisions Justice Thomas has written, and Pat Halpin
clearly hasn't read "The Brethren."
"The Brethren" came out a decade before Thomas was even nominated to the
Supreme Court. The only black Supreme Court justice discussed in "The Brethren"
is Thurgood Marshall. That's one we haven't heard in a while: I just can't tell
you guys apart.
How many black justices have there been on the Supreme Court again? Oh yes:
two. It's one thing to confuse Potter Stewart with Lewis Powell. After all,
there have been a lot of white guys on the court. But there have been only two
black justices – and Democrats can't keep them straight. Two! That's like
getting your mother and father confused. I can name every black guy on a
current National Hockey League roster: Is it asking Democrats too much to
remember the names of the only two black Supreme Court justices?
In "America (The Book)," by Jon Stewart and the writers of Comedy Central's
"Daily Show," the section on the judiciary describes how to make a sock puppet
of Clarence Thomas and then says, "Ta-da! You're Antonin Scalia!" On grounds of
originality alone, Mr. Stewart, I want my money back.
But reviewing the book in the New York Times, Caryn James called the sock
puppet joke one of the book's "gems of pointed political humor." Funny how the
liberal punditocracy all parrot this same "sock puppet" line about Thomas year
after year, almost as if they were sock pu-- oh, never mind.
Curiously, of all the liberals launching racist attacks on black conservatives
I've quoted above, only two are themselves black: the two who write for the New
York Times. So I guess there are still a couple of blacks taking orders from
the Democrats. Isn't there an expression for that? I think it begins with
"Uncle" and ends with "Tom."
.

User: "tw"

Title: Re: The new and improved Democrat racism 17 Dec 2004 04:49:56 AM
You're an idiot, Mikey. Face the fact and move on.
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1103231097.803857.286520@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...


Doc wrote:

"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1103075559.674260.286590@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

Sprinkling his administration with non-whites doesn't detract from

the

historical fact that conservatives have resisted racial

integration in

this nation

most of the first for blacks in higher levels of society and
representation in politics began from the rightwing in American

history

and overwhelmingly - this is a basic fact. Clinton had not one

black in

the top cabinet positions and when the rightwing promoted a black

to

the supreme bench last century they ( the lefty) made up stories of
hairs on coke cans. lol.. You are ridiculous ;) Not to mention

stupid

as well ;)

Rumsfeld is white

When did you figure that out you stupid fucki' moron? ;)


Let's look at what I originally wrote, shall we, crap-tard? ;D --


Look asswipe, Its right here and I reply to exactly what you wrote - so
your little lies here contradicts your header and post, eh fuckshit? ;)

BTW baboons.com fits your personality well. Ya haven't graduated to
the homo-sapien - sapien yet, eh Monkey-tard ;)

From: "Doc" <goblowmores...@baboons.com>
Newsgroups: alt.prophecies.nostradamus
Subject: Re: The new and improved Democrat racism
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 07:41:51 -0800
Organization: http://extra.newsguy.com
Lines: 183
Message-ID: <cpf4g101dlm@enews2.newsguy.com>
References: <20041209062706.08274.00001751@mb-m05.aol.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p-986.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441

Sprinkling his administration with non-whites doesn't detract from the
historical fact that conservatives have resisted racial integration in
this nation, and are almost totally responsible for the resistance
against
the Democrat-led, liberal-led civil rights movement of the 1960s.
Condi is a dumb robotic stooge of Bush. Her tenure as Sec. of State
will
undoubtedly be a foreign-policy disaster.
Rumsfeld is white as the pure-driven snow, and we liberals despise his
lying and manipulations, just as we despise Condi's.
Grow up, Tony, if you can.
Doc ;D


Rumsfeld is white as the pure-driven snow, and we liberals despise

his

lying and manipulations, just as we despise Condi's.

Did you miss something


Nope, but u sure did - like your quoted text ;) nice try brain damage
;)


about how I was giving an example in replying to
Tony's




I don't give a ***** what you were doing. I responded appropriately to
your *****, as I do all the time.

implication that liberals are attacking her just because she's
black, and thereby refuting lil tony's mistaken idea that liberals

are

racist in their criticism of her? Of course, silly, we're not being
racist. We just think she's an asslicking, lying stooge. ;D

Are all blacks asslicking, lying stooges, eh cruddy?


It doesn't matter to me what color rich elitists are in office. I
criticize any of them, any color,




***** fucki' lies as usual. I noticed that Dani has been calling a
supernews account yours - is that true, fucking troll ?

Who can believe your ***** their asswipe?

who promote policies I know are stupid,
insane, unjust, etc. Your implication that, because they're

minorities,

any criticism of their policies, statements, etc., must be racist, is
patently absurd, juvenile and really an ironic reflection on your

racist

frame of mind,



"Sprinkling his administration with non-whites doesn't detract from the
historical fact that conservatives have resisted racial integration in
this nation," That is your quote shitforbrains, and I commented on it
and had nothing to do with the Bush Administration fucktard, nore did I
mention anything about Bush, you lying asswipe of little ***** ;)
You sure are one dumbass fucking liar if I ever read one ;)


http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.prophecies.nostradamus/msg/b8754c5b5
8efeea1?dmode=source




You're a non-discrimination


as opposed to your historical discrimination posts? lol. You sure are
one fuckup individual, ain't ya tard? ;)



showboat with a
broken wheel paddle. ;D
Mikey, you really need to spend a bit more mental energy

comprehending the

context of remarks posters make here,


Fall into your libel crowed and hateful racist fuckshit friends - nope
sorry not going to change to that ;)

ol' boy. Instead, like you
frequently do here and at your surreal website, you have a compulsion

to

edit down an opponents' remarks in order to counter them. That can

prove

embarassing


"embarassing? [sic]"

First learn to spell it then check out how I proved you are an imbecile
by your own words endlessly. You just lied about twice in this post and
I pointed it out with sources and links and you still are behooved;
Must be that Stalinist charm that rubbed off on ya. ;)

.

User: "Tadapope"

Title: Re: The new and improved Democrat racism 12 Dec 2004 03:55:42 PM
Speaking in purely cosmic tongues;
New age style designed to enhance perspective, balance and rejuvennation
for living well with relaxation, stress reduction, massage, meditation, healing
and tranquil auditory programming.
Let the pulse points be felt by all
except for you.
Tangents are infinite in all of nature in
all universes constantly and at random.
* D OUOSVAVV M *
Oh Joy!
Tom
The Psychedelic Pope
Patron Saint of the Internet
http://www.apple2.org.za/gswv/me/
.


  Page 2 of 2

1
 

2
 


Related Articles
 

NEWER
pg.647     pg.357     pg.196     pg.107     pg.58     pg.31     pg.16     pg.8     pg.4     pg.2

OLDER