http://eatthestate.org/11-10/NewWar.htm
The New War
by Geov Parrish
Historians will differ as to when, exactly, we climbed into this
particular Hell-bound handbasket. Nov. 8, 2000, the first stolen
election? Sept. 11, 2001? March 20, 2003, the illegal invasion? Nov. 2,
2004, the second stolen election?
Or Jan. 10, 2006? That was the evening when, with a casualness only the
Idiot King could muster, the United States also declared war on Iran
and Syria.
Congress--both parties--had better hop a clue train, and fast. Same for
the corporate media and the American public. The so-called "surge"
(i.e., escalation) in Iraq is a militarily useless smokescreen; sure,
more American soldiers and lots more Iraqis will die for no particular
reason, but that wasn't the big news from Bush's speech and actions.
Bush, as they say in the news business, buried the lead, because to
come right out and present Armageddon as a fait accompli would have
invited a domestic political firestorm.
So to speak.
Instead, the conflagration is elsewhere. What Bush did on Jan. 10 was
to start a region-wide Middle East war that will inevitably involve the
United States, Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Israel, Saudi
Arabia, and any combination of the Gulf States. And don't forget
Afghanistan, with the rapidly advancing Taliban, and Pakistan, where a
global anti-West jihad will be just the thing to topple Musharraf and
give Islamists the nuclear bomb.
Hundreds of thousands have already died in a war involving only two of
these countries. Think of what adding another 12 or 13, plus nuclear
weaponry, can achieve.
Do you suppose that if he puts on a fake bushy mustache and beard,
George W. Bush is Osama bin Laden?
They certainly seem to have the same vision of a global war of Islam
vs. Judeo-Christianity. Bin Laden, of course, couldn't make it come
true in his wildest dreams. But Bush could. And, now, has.
From Bush's Jan. 10 speech:
"Succeeding in Iraq also requires defending its territorial integrity
and stabilizing the region in the face of the extremist challenge.
"This begins with addressing Iran and Syria. These two regimes are
allowing terrorists and insurgents to use their territory to move in
and out of Iraq. Iran is providing material support for attacks on
American troops. We will disrupt the attacks on our forces. We will
interrupt the flow of support from Iran and Syria. And we will seek out
and destroy the networks providing advanced weaponry and training to
our enemies in Iraq."
In other words, we will go into Iran and Syria. And for the most
transparently false reason imaginable: to interdict weapons
(specifically, IEDs) supposedly coming from Shiite Iran to arm the
Sunni insurgency--which is then using them to blow up not just
Americans, but the Iranian-backed Iraqi Shiites in our Bush-caused
civil war/ethnic cleansing/genocide/pick-any-or-all-three.
Did you follow that? Bush is invading Iran because he's claiming Iran
is arming its own enemies. Seriously. He really thinks we're that
stupid. Rather than lie his way into an illegal invasion with
absurdities, as he did in 2003, Bush is now lying his way into an
illegal invasion by invoking the fantastical.
That wasn't all:
"We are also taking other steps to bolster the security of Iraq and
protect American interests in the Middle East. I recently ordered the
deployment of an additional carrier strike group to the region.
"We will expand intelligence sharing, and deploy Patriot air defense
systems to reassure our friends and allies."
Patriot air defense systems? Against IEDs and car bombs? Of course not,
no more than Bush's second carrier strike group is there to fight a
counter-insurgency war in the desert. Iraqi Sunnis and Shiites aren't
using missile systems. But Iran might. And nothing says "don't
retaliate" after a military strike like a spare nuclear warship or two.
These American moves, like many others, are all about war with Iran.
Which, thanks to their mutual defense pact, automatically also means
war with Syria, which has never made peace with Israel and is closely
allied with the Hezbollah forces on the verge of triggering civil war
in Lebanon.
Speaking of Israel, the London Times reported on Jan. 7 that the
Israeli armed forces are actively training to drop a tactical nuclear
bomb on a suspected Iranian nuclear facility.
The story was datelined Washington, D.C.
As if to celebrate his casual declaration of Rapture-Here-We-Come,
within hours of Bush's speech, American forces launched a pre-dawn raid
on an Iranian consulate in a Kurdish city in northern Iraq, in the
process "detaining" six Iranian diplomats in contravention of every
known diplomatic law. It was, essentially, the first shot after the
declaration of war. (The diplomats are undoubtedly now at some
permanent US base in Iraq, being waterboarded and held in stress
positions.)
Two days later, Condoleezza Rice confirmed that the consulate raid was
on Bush's specific orders, and done under the authority of a secret
executive order Bush signed months ago.
That's no surprise. This has been coming for a long, long time.
Neo-cons have been openly talking for decades, as has the Bush
administration, of their desire to "remake" the entire Middle East, not
just Iraq. Seymour Hersh of the New Yorker reported two years ago that
the US military had already begun covert operations in Iran in
preparation for a military strike or invasion there. Scott Ritter
claimed impeccable sources told him the invasion was planned for June
2005. Hersh kept pumping out articles on Iran war preparations last
year, revealing, among other things, that the neo-cons around Bush (in
favor) were battling the Joint Chiefs of Staff (opposed) over the
prospect of nuking Iran. While Democrats continued to watch poll
numbers and dither on the desirability of attacking Iran, Bush made a
number of military moves in late September suggesting a possible strike
in time for the midterms. And his whole "rollout" strategy of executing
Saddam just before the new year ("Morning in Iraq!") and reshuffling
his military leadership to put people capable of fighting (and anxious
to fight) a broader regional war in charge, have all pointed us to this
moment.
This is pure, unadulterated madness. A broad regional war, even if it
doesn't lead to World War III and Armageddeon, will kill millions,
almost certainly see the first use of nuclear weapons in 60 years, will
make Americans (and Israelis) far less safe, will destroy America's and
the world's economies, will bankrupt our country, cripple our military,
and will permanently isolate America as a globally despised moral leper
on the level of Nazi Germany. Oh, and we'll lose. Badly.
Meanwhile, congressional Democrats wring their hands over trying to
prevent the deployment of 21,500 extra troops to Iraq, the first of
which, in the 82nd Airborne Division, had already arrived in Baghdad
before Bush's speech.
Congress--both parties--needs to yank military funding from Bush's
control. Now. Period. End of statement. Bush is not only launching a
truly catastrophic war, but is threatening this country's future, and
is directly defying Congress and the will of American voters, not to
mention the Constitution, to do it. This larger regional war must be
stopped, as Malcolm X once said, by any means necessary.
On Jan. 27 there is a national antiwar rally scheduled for Washington,
D.C., with smaller events in communities across the country. Turn out.
If you can, go to Washington. There's a lobby day on Jan. 29, but
marching on one day and lobbying on another isn't enough. Stay there.
Camp. Shut things down. Insist that Congress do nothing else until this
insanity is ended. If that means removing Bush and Cheney from office
to stop them from destroying our country, do it.
In capital cities from Manila to Santiago to Djakarta to Belgrade to
Kiev to La Paz to much of the former Soviet bloc, crowds in the last
two decades have demanded, successfully and nonviolently, that their
countries be run by leaders who actually have the countries' best
interests in mind. These ordinary people, many millions of them, took
real risks and made real sacrifices to force change.
Did they care about their futures any more than you care about yours?
Go to Washington, or make your voice heard where you are. Make sure
Congress and our 217-year-old government do not walk away from the
challenge now being presented by a president from Shakespeare's
nightmares.
Act. Today, and in the weeks to come. Muslim, Jewish, and Christian
mothers across the Middle East, and America, and the world, will thank
you.
==================================
.
|
