It comes as little surprise to me that people across the world who
bother to do any research, all seem to draw the same conclusions
without ever speaking amongst themselves. Why is it so blatently
obvious to some, but rejected by others?
The author of this site is, no doubt, a Christian. I stated once
before that my beliefs were somewhat holistic of all religions, with a
belief in a creator, and a somewhat figurative view on much of the
Bible. However, the further I delved into the Illuminati issue, the
more parallels I discovered between their beliefs (or how they present
them) and my own as they developed. This has been becoming
increasingly more perturbing the further I research it.
Growing up in a Christian home and attending a 'happy clappy' church
through much of my teen years, I rapidly began to reject the Church as
a haven for 'happy lemmings' who were hypocritically judgemental of
others, and only seemed to be 'good Christians' on a Sunday, or whilst
with their 'brothers' and 'sisters'. Up until this time, I rejected
the matter of Satanism, Witchcraft, and other forms of Magick and
anyone who was a practitioner of such. However, after this time, and
after trying my hand at pendulum divination and tarot-reading, I began
to develop a certain tolerance of them.
I researched Paganism, Wiccanry, Druidry (pagan), elemental Sorcery,
divination and other forms of mysticism in an effort to gain an
understanding of a side to the spiritual spectrum that I had once
denied myself. Having opened my mind, lost faith in religion, and
finding no inherent dangers, I later began dabbling in it.
Over the years after that, I researched the pyramids, Atlantis, the
writings of Edgar Cayce, the power crystals and the fabled hall of
records. I did a fair amount of research into Greek/Roman/Egyptian
mythology, as well as some consideration of the doctrines of other
religions as well as Masonry, particularly the story of Jaques de
Molay and the Knights Templar's quest for the Holy Grail. Everywhere
I looked, I found allignments and similarities. Gradually, I tied my
own beliefs into most religions and myths in a way which showed me
that no religion was the best the religion, in both meanings that that
presents. This has been my 'belief' ever since...shaped by mysticism
and paganism.
I researched the Illuminati as a Christian teenager, but, although it
intrigued me, there was no real basis in fact. Probably because of my
age and the inherent naivity that goes along with it, I could not see
any evidence of it in the outside world, apart from their 'alleged'
symbol on the $1 bill. As I turned from religion, however, its
significance dwindled, and any 'religious nonsense' became the last
thing on my mind.
Having returned to Usenet, however, and after reading a post in this
NG regarding the Skull and Bones (before I posted any), I began to
read up on it myself. Initially, I found no connection to Masonry at
all. However, I later began to see a multi-facetted story developing.
It wasn't long before I realised that it was, in fact, a
multi-facetted organisation. Further research began to reveal the
scope that the organisation commands.
I could never have imagined a correlation between the Bolcheviks and
the western world, until uncovering their common ties to the Khazars,
as with the Bauer/Rothschilds. I remembered from my teenage years
that the Rothschilds were allegedly part of the Illuminati. It wasn't
until after reading Albert Pike, however, that I understood how such a
collusion could have been possible as well as the purpose behind it.
Then I discovered the origins of the House of Windsor, and their
change of name from Saxe-Coburg-Gotha to Windsor early this century.
I'm not sure, but, as another poster once stated, you've got to look
carefully at Germany sometimes, as he said "history repeats itself".
Right. So now we have the Rothschilds, who originated from Germany
formerly known by the name of Bauer, and then we have the British
royal family, who originated from Germany formerly known by the name
of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha. What else? Aaah, the old Skull and Bones. An
extract from a secret society from where? Yes, Germany too. Where
did the Illuminati first appear in history? Yes, from the state of
Bavaria in Germany. Who began a quest for world domination on two
occasions? Yes, Germany.
I don't want to go about blaming Germany for history, or even for the
future. I think the powers in Germany itself are too much the wiser
to go about a third campaign themselves. In the meanwhile, the
Bolchevist dictatorship of the USSR afforded the USA the opportunity
to stockpile a vast military strength unchecked throughout the last 60
years, happily supported by the "free" world, who were only too
pleased to have a powerfull ally against any future threat. This in
turn afforded the USA the opportunity of stationing forces at
foreign-based military bases around the world. Once the USSR had
played its part, it became redundant. Two powers were more of a
hinderance to the ideal than a solution. A carefully inspired
uprising resulted in Russia seceeding from the USSR, which in turn
resulted in the USSR's disbandment, and Germany thus regained unity
after the fall of the Berlin Wall.
Now, in the first world conquest, the monarchy in Russia was deposed
and two other empires were abolished, allowing for the birth of
Communism and the USSR. In the second world war, the toll all but
crippled Europe both politically and economically, which afforded the
rapid spread of Communism accross Europe, but only to leave a perfect,
fragile balance of power in place. The war also heightened tensions
between Zionists and extreme nationalst. The conclusion of the second
conquest thus resulted in the (re)birth of Israel in the land of
Palestine, advocated by Rothschild. This undoubtedly has heightened
tensions between Zionism and Islam, and anyone carefully adding fuel
to the flames would certainly result in a showdown of the religions -
or the whole world, yet again.
This is no quoting, people. These are my thoughts on where I've come
from, where we, the world have come from, and where we, the world are
going. I'm not going to try and convince anyone of anything that are
purely thoughts and calculations on my part. This is no prophesy, no
psychic gift - just researched and calculated. It's all out there for
anyone else to do the same.
Read the article below. My thoughts after 9/11 are pretty much
summarised by the author.
Regards.
Excerpt from: http://www.jeremiahproject.com/newworldorder/index.html
=====
The New World Order
As the 20th-century idols of atheism, humanism and communism are
falling worldwide a spiritual vacuum is left that must be filled. In
the resulting contest for the souls and minds of Americans, the church
faces formidable opponents in globalists, socialists, New Age
religion, Islam and Satanism.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
At that time many will turn away from the faith and will betray and
hate each other, and many false prophets will appear and deceive many
people.
- Matthew 24:11
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No longer are we only threatened from without by a group of balding
hard-line Communists - we are now threatened from within - by a group
of intelligent, well-dressed liberals who over the coming years intend
to convince America and the nations of the world that the only way to
lasting world peace is the establishment of a ... "New World Order."
"New World Order," is a term used to describe the uniting of the
world's superpowers to secure and maintain "global peace."
World leaders are excited at the prospects for peace and there has
been much talk about entering a "new era" and about the establishment
of a "New World Order."
Mikhail Gorbachev was the first world leader to come out publicly with
talk of a "new world order," and he did so nearly two years before
George Bush caught the vision. In his historic address to the United
Nations on December 7, 1988, the Soviet Prime Minister made this
dogmatic and even prophetic statement: "Further global progress is now
possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement
towards a new world order."
Just before leaving for Helsinki, Finland, early in September 1990 to
discuss the Persian Gulf crisis at his summit meeting with Soviet
President Gorbachev, President George Bush expressed the hope that
"the foundation for the new world order would be laid in Helsinki" and
that it would be established under the United Nations. At the news
conference with Gorbachev following their historic meeting, President
Bush declared optimistically: "If the nations of the world, acting
together, continue as they have been we will set in place the
cornerstone of an international order more peaceful than any that we
have known."
George Bush had been a good and faithful servant of the "brotherhood"
and as no one before him, had made the "One World" agenda his main
focus. Then in 1993, the New World Order was established as a
legitimate national agenda - by a socialist Democrat, Bill Clinton.
Since both Bush and Clinton were beholding to the same secret orders
codes and financiers, it has been suggested that they may have
engineered the change of Presidents by manipulating the American
people to pull the plug on Bush? George Bush may have actually been
running a campaign to LOSE the presidency.
Globalists saw this as democracy's finest hour - through manipulation,
the democratic system installed a socialist, new age, one-world leader
with the charismatic appeal of John F. Kennedy to do their bidding!
During Clinton's reign, New World Order Socialists publicly came out
of the closet in the U.S. House of Representatives. The powerful and
popular lobby called the Progressive Caucus now began openly espousing
the principles of socialism and have signed onto the agenda of the
Democratic Socialists of America.
Bill Clinton's favorite answer to all questions was government. Got a
problem? Bill Clinton's new government program can fix it. Lost your
job? Sign up for an employee retraining program. Feeling a little
under the weather? A visit to your regional health alliance will shape
you up. Having difficulty raising your children? Join our village
because "It takes more than a family to raise children."
Originally created to defend and protect, our government was now being
asked to provide. Today, many Americans think the government must be
the answer to all societal problems. And as the problems grow, so must
the government.
"We are redefining in practical terms the immutable ideals that have
guided us from the beginning." - President Bill Clinton
Traditionally, Democrats have stood for big government, far-reaching
federally controlled and federally funded programs and taxation at
levels to match. One has to only scan through a few of Clinton's
policies in economic, spending, and tax strategy to see that
sovereignty and personal freedoms were the items actually targeted for
reduction.
In the simplest of terms, the sum of Bill Clinton's administration
amounted to a federal government takeover of the management of
American business, health care, education and the American family.
Clinton's actions demonstrated that he envisioned much more than mere
renewal or reform; he wanted to create an entirely new society
controlled by a massive government.
The Global Age is right upon us.
It is on the horizon of our lifetime.
It has been a long time in the making, its pieces fitting into place
from divergent realms. It is not some prophetically speculative or
futuristic fairy tale, but a real world reality. Gears and levers of
history have been moved and adjusted, and a large-scale game of
Monopoly has been played, with real currency and real assets shifting
hands - a game with very real winners and losers. It is a dangerous
and risky undertaking, for they are vastly outnumbered. Secrecy of
their true agenda is critical.
While it is nearly impossible to accurately trace the interlocking
agendas of these organizations, the supernatural dimension is the one
that gives the puzzle meaning. How else can you explain a master plan
that has existed for hundreds of years?
Today, the power of a certain group of bankers is colossal according
to Harvard and Princeton professor emeritus, Carroll Quigley, who
confessed to being an insider and confidant of this elite group. He
said of this group:
This network which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no
aversion to cooperating with the Communists or any other group, and
frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I
have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in
the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no
aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life,
been close to it and to many of its instruments. (Carroll Quigley,
Tragedy and Hope (New York: The Macmillan Co., 1966), pg. 950.)
Quigley summarized the insider's grand plan: "Their aim is nothing
less than to create a world system of financial control in private
hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the
economy of the world as a whole. The system was to be controlled in a
feudalistic fashion by the central banks of the world acting in
concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings
and conferences."
A "Crisis" in America
To help complacent Americans accept the new government intrusions,
Clinton propagandists instilled fear of just about every crisis they
could conjure up. The buzzword of the nineties was "crisis." We were
told we had a health care "crisis" - justifying the government
takeover of one-seventh of the U.S. economy. We were told we had a
ecological "crisis" - justifying the government to impose far reaching
new regulations on businesses. We were told we had a child care
"crisis" - justifying the government to extend its reach into the
family.
President Clinton used the strategic use of Executive Orders to bypass
Congress and the will of the American people. In violation of the
Constitutional balance of powers, Mr. Clinton said he would legislate
by Executive Order if Congress did not bow to his legislative agenda.
"I have a continuing obligation to act, to use the authority of the
presidency and the persuasive power of the podium, to advance
America´s interests...," said Mr. Clinton.
There was no debate, no media coverage, and no vote ... just President
Clinton signing into law whatever he believed "is the right thing to
do." "Stroke of the pen. Law of the land. Kinda cool," said Mr.
Clinton´s senior advisor Paul Begala.
Failing to get this dictatorial mandate past Congress, liberals in the
White House and Congress subverted the 10th Amendment by
"greenmailing" the states into submission. The liberal strategy was to
withhold tax revenues from the states, if states did not surrender
constitutional rights and submit to legislative mandates voluntarily.
With the government takeover of much of the American economy, health
care, and the family well under way, Socialists turned its attention
next to a constitutional "crisis".
While the media and across America, attention was focused on
butterfly-ballots and elderly voters who could not complete a ballot,
beneath the surface was brewing yet another incremental attack on the
Constitution of the United States of America by Socialists determined
to quietly overthrow this country.
As has been their technique for years, Socialists understand that they
will not be able to radically change this country over night. Rather,
theirs is a step-by-step incremental approach of first undermining the
foundations of this country by creating doubt and distrust by the
TV-educated and uninformed American public.
In November, 2000, as politicians and lawyers descend upon Florida for
hand recounts upon recounts, Americans were fed a daily dose of
propaganda designed to sway them away from the Constitutionally
established norm of electing Presidents in this country.
This attack on the Constitution did not come as a surprise. It was
simply part and parcel of an ongoing and systematic dismantling of our
Constitution. And, folks, Democrats and Republicans alike are not only
being duped by the Socialist propaganda, but in many cases are
championing it.
Shaking America's Foundations
With the son of the man who introduced the New World Order to America
now in place, George W. Bush's mandate was to further his father's
agenda of extending government control over American citizens and
empowering the tentacles of a One World Government into foreign lands.
Recognizing that no Socialist movement can succeed unless it has
control over the movement of it's citizens and insider intelligence of
those who oppose them, Globalists along with President G.W. Bush,
needed another "crisis" to move their agenda along.
That crisis came compliments of a group of extremist Muslims, perhaps
even orchestrated by the CIA and/or FBI on Sept. 11, 2001.
What they have done is create a new globalist government initiative
dubbed, "Homeland Security" and have renewed criminal government
intrusion into the private lives of Americans once used by Richard
Nixon in his war on anti-war protestors, environmentalists, and civil
rights activists.
Following every contrived "crisis" in America, the response is always
the same... to erode more liberties in exchange for the promise that
it will never happen again. And the result is, it continues to happen
again and again, only American citizens have LESS freedom.
We heard the same argument following the rash of hijackings during the
'70s and following the crash of TWA 800 and bombing of Pan Am 103. The
result was that four airplanes could be hijacked simultaneously and
used to attack Americas financial center and our nations capital. We
heard the argument following the bombing in Oklahoma City. The result
was the total destruction of the World Trade Center.
Globalists everywhere can celebrate the attack on America because
their goals are being accomplished. Their desire to instill fear into
the hearts of Americans is accomplished as Americans fear flying and
are willing to exchange their freedom for the false feeling of
security. Their desire to destroy our free democratic system is
accomplished as we allow the government to further intrude into our
private lives in exchange for a false feeling of security.
In the wake of the Globalist inspired attack on America, we keep
hearing especially politicians saying "we must do what needs to be
done so that it never happens again."
No, we don't need to ensure it never happens again... we need to get
at the root of the problem and why we allowed it to happen at all.
Americans should look inward and ask why our great country can support
despots throughout the world in exchange for oil and wonder why the
victims in those regions consider us the enemy.
While Americans were freely giving up many of their Constitutional
rights in exchange for so-called "security" and now needing a
scapegoat to ratioanlize their loss, President Bush moved to the next
stage of the globalist agenda.
According to an article in the Sunday Herald, President Bush and his
cabinet were planning a premeditated attack on Iraq to secure 'regime
change' even before he took power in January 2001. The blueprint for
the creation of a 'global Pax Americana' was drawn up for ***** Cheney,
Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, and others. The document, entitled
Rebuilding America's Defences: Strategies, Forces And Resources For A
New Century, was written in September 2000 by the neo-conservative
think-tank Project for the New American Century (PNAC).
The plan shows Bush's cabinet intended to take military control of the
Gulf region whether or not Saddam Hussein was in power. It says: 'The
United States has for decades sought to play a more permanent role in
Gulf regional security. While the unresolved conflict with Iraq
provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial
American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime
of Saddam Hussein.'
Whipping up fear into Americans once again, President Bush and Tony
Blair invaded Iraq under the guise of eliminating weapons of mass
destruction. While NONE were found, both continued their charge that
WMD existed with the fervor that would make Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf
proud.
.
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: The New World Order - Tell it like it is |
27 Sep 2004 07:49:25 PM |
|
|
Cuan <an@nymous.co.za> wrote in message news:<chbgl0d81k4fchnj62mcvcu7ce4as6gvkk@4ax.com>...
No longer are we only threatened from without by a group of balding
hard-line Communists - we are now threatened from within - by a group
of intelligent, well-dressed liberals who over the coming years intend
to convince America and the nations of the world that the only way to
lasting world peace is the establishment of a ... "New World Order."
The word is a *liberal* being today ambiguous; can we say they are
talking about leftists here?
In the 20th Century ( although they could never mount such a thing)
both Russia (Soviet Union) and China (Mao Tze-tung) had drawn up plans
to take over the world under the guise of communism. That was a
leftist ploy - here is a word that is more cleaver - because today's
leftists in American have co-opted the word: *liberals* -> Which is
diametrically opposed to its original meaning of individual freedom,
less taxes, and natural rights, so-on-and-so-on or the term
right-wing.
The only people I know who are trying to convince us (the world) for
a 'one world order' is the Kofi Anan guy at the UN and his cronies
(highly structured society). Others include Usama bin Laden under the
guise of Islam. C-'BS' Dan RAthER may be involved but that is an IF
and a big IF. Hillary Duff is a far outsider and MADonna is too far
gone. Although the Chipmunks can make a strong comeback, if they want
too. ;)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cuan" |
|
| Title: Re: The New World Order - Tell it like it is |
28 Sep 2004 04:46:25 AM |
|
|
On 27 Sep 2004 17:49:25 -0700, (Michael
Johnathan McDonald) wrote:
Cuan <an@nymous.co.za> wrote in message news:<chbgl0d81k4fchnj62mcvcu7ce4as6gvkk@4ax.com>...
No longer are we only threatened from without by a group of balding
hard-line Communists - we are now threatened from within - by a group
of intelligent, well-dressed liberals who over the coming years intend
to convince America and the nations of the world that the only way to
lasting world peace is the establishment of a ... "New World Order."
The word is a *liberal* being today ambiguous; can we say they are
talking about leftists here?
In the 20th Century ( although they could never mount such a thing)
both Russia (Soviet Union) and China (Mao Tze-tung) had drawn up plans
to take over the world under the guise of communism. That was a
leftist ploy - here is a word that is more cleaver - because today's
leftists in American have co-opted the word: *liberals* -> Which is
diametrically opposed to its original meaning of individual freedom,
less taxes, and natural rights, so-on-and-so-on or the term
right-wing.
The only people I know who are trying to convince us (the world) for
a 'one world order' is the Kofi Anan guy at the UN and his cronies
(highly structured society). Others include Usama bin Laden under the
guise of Islam. C-'BS' Dan RAthER may be involved but that is an IF
and a big IF. Hillary Duff is a far outsider and MADonna is too far
gone. Although the Chipmunks can make a strong comeback, if they want
too. ;)
Oh, and before I forget...the author of that link I provided in my
other reply to this message is, no doubt, a Moslem. Don't let that
bug you - you can always replace the word 'Allah' with 'God' at the
end of the page. I thought it was quite refreshing to see a Moslem's
view of the NWO - I didn't realise they had one. Nonetheless, he has
obviously done his research. The fact that he can synopsize to this
extent, indicates to me that he has done a considerable amount of
independent research of his own - always a good thing. Pity that the
vast majority of westerners cannot thing for themselves in the same
manner.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: The New World Order - Tell it like it is |
29 Sep 2004 03:42:40 PM |
|
|
Cuan <an@nymous.co.za> wrote in message news:<iobil0l24abf6dkp2s2u1maf5um52q9d6m@4ax.com>...
On 27 Sep 2004 17:49:25 -0700, (Michael
Johnathan McDonald) wrote:
Oh, and before I forget...the author of that link I provided in my
other reply to this message is, no doubt, a Moslem. Don't let that
bug you
I belive it bugs you more than me. ;)
- you can always replace the word 'Allah' with 'God' at the
end of the page.
I notice you blame Israel for everything wrong in the middle east - I
have link to you stating this so no denying - I just want to know your
reasons? Concrete reasons not ‘half hearted ramblings of a lunatic
reasons?' Thank ya sucka!
I thought it was quite refreshing to see a Moslem's
view of the NWO
Still learning new things are ya? wow, maybe by next century you can
learn about another culture. At this rate it will take you about 20
thousands years to shore up a general knowledge of world cultures -
but heah? That's your pace - not everyone is slow like you ;)
- I didn't realise they had one.
Yes I know, in fact you don't realize much do ya? Maybe how to be
negative in posts and pessimistic about solutions. Just maybe you
cannot see that you are. There is a revelation for ya. I cite a most
recent example, but I have no time and there is always that link in
case you pooo-pooo yourself.
Nonetheless, he has
obviously done his research.
I read it - just general run of the mill stuff that anyone can get off
the other 10000 conspiracy sites on the web- nothing spectacular.
The fact that he can synopsize to this
extent, indicates to me that he has done a considerable amount of
independent research of his own
His work looks as cut and past re-writing to me. Where is any original
thought process or analysis of his general unproved points? I notice
you claimed a major point than I asked you to put an example (Because
I knew you couldn't because I have done the learning of the subject)
and you have not replied. Silly me - thinking you have a mind of your
own. ;(
- always a good thing. Pity that the
vast majority of westerners cannot thing for themselves in the same
manner.
Nice job. Really ousted yourself here pal. Lets get down to what is
really important besides your arrogance of ignorance!
Is that the picture of you or your friend on the index page? I think
it was a halfhearted way to show me your or his work and have it
judge. However, it is the same crud on 10,000 other conspiracy
websites that have no back-up documentation.
Donate as little as $10.00 to help me produce useful software for our
kids.
http://www.geocities.com/aliadams/1stTalk.htm
Would that be conspiracy software for kids? ;) Hey Kids, It's Ali
Adams today we will learn about how McDonalds puts secret addictive
ingredients that makes one return as often as one can afford too.
McDonalds is run by the secret wing of cabals of the inner workings of
the CIA. Flash- don't eat the Chicken McNuggets – they contain brain
wave chips that make you steal from your mommy and purchase more
Chicken McNuggets ;)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cuan" |
|
| Title: Re: The New World Order - Tell it like it is |
30 Sep 2004 10:19:18 AM |
|
|
On 29 Sep 2004 13:42:40 -0700, (Michael
Johnathan McDonald) wrote:
Cuan <an@nymous.co.za> wrote in message news:<iobil0l24abf6dkp2s2u1maf5um52q9d6m@4ax.com>...
On 27 Sep 2004 17:49:25 -0700, (Michael
Johnathan McDonald) wrote:
Oh, and before I forget...the author of that link I provided in my
other reply to this message is, no doubt, a Moslem. Don't let that
bug you
I belive it bugs you more than me. ;)
I doubt it. If I hadn't written this, you would have dismissed it as
prejudiced anti-western propaganda.
- you can always replace the word 'Allah' with 'God' at the
end of the page.
I notice you blame Israel for everything wrong in the middle east - I
have link to you stating this so no denying - I just want to know your
reasons? Concrete reasons not ‘half hearted ramblings of a lunatic
reasons?' Thank ya sucka!
I don't blame Israel for "everything" wrong in the middle-east,
lemming. I blame the US's foreign policy too. ;-) But just for fun,
post your 'link' so I can dribble over it.
I thought it was quite refreshing to see a Moslem's
view of the NWO
Still learning new things are ya? wow, maybe by next century you can
learn about another culture. At this rate it will take you about 20
thousands years to shore up a general knowledge of world cultures -
but heah? That's your pace - not everyone is slow like you ;)
Oooh...been gOOgling for insults like Johnny "The Troll" Griffin, eh?
It's all too easy to deal with people like that, and I'm so thoroughly
enjoying our correspondence.
- I didn't realise they had one.
Yes I know, in fact you don't realize much do ya? Maybe how to be
negative in posts and pessimistic about solutions. Just maybe you
cannot see that you are. There is a revelation for ya. I cite a most
recent example, but I have no time and there is always that link in
case you pooo-pooo yourself.
Before we carry on here, my profound little hamburger chef - do you
have anything of value to add to the topic of this thread? If not,
don't waste my time please. There's plenty of other threads wherein
we can lock horns and erode your ego.
Nonetheless, he has
obviously done his research.
I read it - just general run of the mill stuff that anyone can get off
the other 10000 conspiracy sites on the web- nothing spectacular.
Aah, but he has placed many subjects on one page. Hence my use of the
word, "synopsize" below.
The fact that he can synopsize to this
extent, indicates to me that he has done a considerable amount of
independent research of his own
His work looks as cut and past re-writing to me. Where is any original
thought process or analysis of his general unproved points? I notice
you claimed a major point than I asked you to put an example (Because
I knew you couldn't because I have done the learning of the subject)
and you have not replied. Silly me - thinking you have a mind of your
own. ;(
Excuse me? That didn't make much sense. Refresh my memory about this
example of whatever that you asked me for. Oh, and you've done *what*
learning on *what* subject exactly?
- always a good thing. Pity that the
vast majority of westerners cannot thing for themselves in the same
manner.
Nice job. Really ousted yourself here pal. Lets get down to what is
really important besides your arrogance of ignorance!
What? Bwahaha! Ousted myself from what? The west? With that
sentence? You're not going to stick that one on me, dumbass. That's
almost as silly as Jean's racist slurs. You are a westerner, are you
not? How is it possible that a Moslem knows more about the NWO than a
little *****-stain like yourself? Let me tell you - BECAUSE HE DOESN'T
LISTEN TO WESTERN MEDIA, and certainly doesn't take everything it says
at face value as though he's being spoon-fed. People like Jean (feel
happy that I've excluded you for now) are the clear example of
closed-mindedness - and sadly, he is one of the "vast majority" to
which I was referring.
Is that the picture of you or your friend on the index page? I think
it was a halfhearted way to show me your or his work and have it
judge. However, it is the same crud on 10,000 other conspiracy
websites that have no back-up documentation.
Me or which friend, exactly? The answer would be 'no'. No backup
documentation? And you say you're learned on the subject? You
haven't even tried to find any, silly little wimp. The books have
been written, quoted, and posted - PLENTY OF TIMES, dumbass. Try
reading some of those '10,000' other conspiracy sites, will ya?
Donate as little as $10.00 to help me produce useful software for our
kids.
http://www.geocities.com/aliadams/1stTalk.htm
Would that be conspiracy software for kids? ;) Hey Kids, It's Ali
Adams today we will learn about how McDonalds puts secret addictive
ingredients that makes one return as often as one can afford too.
McDonalds is run by the secret wing of cabals of the inner workings of
the CIA. Flash- don't eat the Chicken McNuggets – they contain brain
wave chips that make you steal from your mommy and purchase more
Chicken McNuggets ;)
You would know. You fry the fuckers every weekend. Tell us, Ronald -
what *do* you put in that secret sauce?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cuan" |
|
| Title: Re: The New World Order - Tell it like it is |
28 Sep 2004 04:26:28 AM |
|
|
On 27 Sep 2004 17:49:25 -0700, (Michael
Johnathan McDonald) wrote:
Cuan <an@nymous.co.za> wrote in message news:<chbgl0d81k4fchnj62mcvcu7ce4as6gvkk@4ax.com>...
No longer are we only threatened from without by a group of balding
hard-line Communists - we are now threatened from within - by a group
of intelligent, well-dressed liberals who over the coming years intend
to convince America and the nations of the world that the only way to
lasting world peace is the establishment of a ... "New World Order."
The word is a *liberal* being today ambiguous; can we say they are
talking about leftists here?
In the 20th Century ( although they could never mount such a thing)
both Russia (Soviet Union) and China (Mao Tze-tung) had drawn up plans
to take over the world under the guise of communism. That was a
leftist ploy - here is a word that is more cleaver - because today's
leftists in American have co-opted the word: *liberals* -> Which is
diametrically opposed to its original meaning of individual freedom,
less taxes, and natural rights, so-on-and-so-on or the term
right-wing.
The only people I know who are trying to convince us (the world) for
a 'one world order' is the Kofi Anan guy at the UN and his cronies
(highly structured society). Others include Usama bin Laden under the
guise of Islam. C-'BS' Dan RAthER may be involved but that is an IF
and a big IF. Hillary Duff is a far outsider and MADonna is too far
gone. Although the Chipmunks can make a strong comeback, if they want
too. ;)
The answers to your jest...
http://www.geocities.com/aliadams/nwo.htm
(Read the whole page and consider it before you remark)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
