Thanks to the surprise victory of GEORGE "DUBYA" BUSH over that lame
democratic candidate, AMERICA THE BEAUTIFuL now has a chance to
further its great agenda of Americanizing the world.
Bush has a Republican Senate and House. He has a majority
vote. He has lots of money. He has ***** Cheney to do his
dirty work. He basically can retire now, and let the
defense and energy corporations get on with the business
of running the world.
So now what? Well, I'll tell ya. Look out Iran. We are coming
and the world can't stop us. Iran is next on the list.
We will crush you. We laugh at your puny attempts at terrorism.
You knock down a building; we knock down a country or three.
We can continue to allow our ally Israel to flagrantly
violate human rights and even kill non-violent American
protesters dumb enough to try to protect terrorists.
We can continue to turn our backs as our
tax dollars are used to do things that we would consider
human rights violations anywhere else in the world.
And you Palestinians who danced in the streets after 9/11?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Keep dancing. Your hatred only gives
us justification to continue to victimize and dominate you.
Al Jazeera is GW's most useful tool.
And the economy will recover. Bush will allow the oil
companies to assure that oil continues to dominate the
world economy. We can suck the Iraqi oil wells dry
at the expense of a few thousand cheap American lives and
pollute the environment to our hearts' content. And
the U.N. can't and won't do anything to stop us.
Four years from now, we will have the FIRST woman
president ever. I'm certain all the Arab nations will
look at us in shock and awe when she takes the helm.
Congratulations are in order for the United States of America.
We stood strong and supported a president who took
us to war on completely bogus evidence, who violated
badly needed treaties signed by other American Presidents,
and who still has yet to track down Osama Bin Laden.
Well, I better get back to watching Fox News. Hannity
and Colms is almost over. See you all when we start the
next war justifying huge defense spending when there really is no
enemy anywhere. Let the healing begin.
We have nothing to fear but fear itself.
S~
.
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Jean has no decency. Period. J. Re: Answer this Jean...Re: Thenext four years |
18 Nov 2004 12:07:53 AM |
|
|
Jane a écrit:
"Dani" <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5r1op0d79aenn735843hk43h3hjtpfr4n5@4ax.com...
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:49:53 GMT, "R. Foreman"
<eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
Dani <dani7200@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:59:39 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
You mean my smoking pit in the 70s. Sure. And Dani smokes pot,.
Ah that would be smok(ed) - note the *past tense* why do you say
"smokes" as if I do it now?
And also - why only mention me? There's plenty of others here on this
group who have smoked in the past.
I think we should get Saint Isadore's expert opinion on this.
There's others also, Randy.. 5 that I know of for sure (because they
mentioned it here).. but unlike you-know-who, I won't say their names.
Dani
One of them was me. I am not ashamed of it...but I gave it up in my early
20s, which was 20 years ago. It just made me want to nod off.
Jane
So you committed a crime 20 years ago jane (by tw standards)?
Bottom line, do you think it is a criminal act that makes you a criminal?
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: Jean has no decency. Period. J. Re: Answer this Jean...Re: The next four years |
18 Nov 2004 09:41:35 AM |
|
|
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:X_Wmd.4695464$ic1.447965@news.easynews.com...
Jane a écrit:
"Dani" <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5r1op0d79aenn735843hk43h3hjtpfr4n5@4ax.com...
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:49:53 GMT, "R. Foreman"
<eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
Dani <dani7200@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:59:39 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
You mean my smoking pit in the 70s. Sure. And Dani smokes pot,.
Ah that would be smok(ed) - note the *past tense* why do you say
"smokes" as if I do it now?
And also - why only mention me? There's plenty of others here on this
group who have smoked in the past.
I think we should get Saint Isadore's expert opinion on this.
There's others also, Randy.. 5 that I know of for sure (because they
mentioned it here).. but unlike you-know-who, I won't say their names.
Dani
One of them was me. I am not ashamed of it...but I gave it up in my
early
20s, which was 20 years ago. It just made me want to nod off.
Jane
So you committed a crime 20 years ago jane (by tw standards)?
I guess I did. Oh, well, I was never arrested. I suppose I commit crimes
daily, as I drive with a heavy foot, :)!
Bottom line, do you think it is a criminal act that makes you a criminal?
You know tw. He gets these obsessions in his head and won't let them go
come hell or high water. 10 years from now he'll still be harping on it! I
would just ignore him (I know its hard....)
Jane
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Jean has no decency. Period. J. Re: Answer this Jean...Re: The next four years |
18 Nov 2004 10:09:38 AM |
|
|
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Go3nd.26741$rc.1557521@news20.bellglobal.com...
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:X_Wmd.4695464$ic1.447965@news.easynews.com...
Jane a écrit:
"Dani" <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5r1op0d79aenn735843hk43h3hjtpfr4n5@4ax.com...
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:49:53 GMT, "R. Foreman"
<eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
Dani <dani7200@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:59:39 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
You mean my smoking pit in the 70s. Sure. And Dani smokes pot,.
Ah that would be smok(ed) - note the *past tense* why do you say
"smokes" as if I do it now?
And also - why only mention me? There's plenty of others here on
this
group who have smoked in the past.
I think we should get Saint Isadore's expert opinion on this.
There's others also, Randy.. 5 that I know of for sure (because they
mentioned it here).. but unlike you-know-who, I won't say their names.
Dani
One of them was me. I am not ashamed of it...but I gave it up in my
early
20s, which was 20 years ago. It just made me want to nod off.
Jane
So you committed a crime 20 years ago jane (by tw standards)?
I guess I did.
No you didn't. They're MY standards after all..
Oh, well, I was never arrested.
Exactly.. and you aren't restricted from entering the US due to your
criminal record.
I suppose I commit crimes
daily, as I drive with a heavy foot, :)!
Naught naughty. For the record I regard that as worse than smoking dope - at
least you only hurt yuorself if you take drugs, but failure to observe speed
limits endagers others..
Bottom line, do you think it is a criminal act that makes you a
criminal?
You know tw. He gets these obsessions in his head
you and me both, eh? ;-)
and won't let them go
come hell or high water.
Nope, I simply object to being falsely accused of "anti-semite" by anyone
who isn't prepared to even explain their rationale. As you yourself pointed
out, none of the posts Jean presented as evidence for his "anti-semtism"
accusations actually contained any anti-semitism.
10 years from now he'll still be harping on it! I
LOL! Like Jean wouldn't, if it weren't for the fact he'll be wormfood in 10
years...
would just ignore him (I know its hard....)
He is now, mainly because Amy asked him some rather difficult questions
about why he doesn't label Tony an anti-semite, even though he clearly reads
and agrees with many extreme right wing, hate promoting anti-semitic sites..
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: Jean has no decency. Period. J. Re: Answer this Jean...Re: The next four years |
18 Nov 2004 10:35:15 PM |
|
|
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:cnih95$ski$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Go3nd.26741$rc.1557521@news20.bellglobal.com...
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:X_Wmd.4695464$ic1.447965@news.easynews.com...
Jane a écrit:
"Dani" <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5r1op0d79aenn735843hk43h3hjtpfr4n5@4ax.com...
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:49:53 GMT, "R. Foreman"
<eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
Dani <dani7200@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:59:39 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
You mean my smoking pit in the 70s. Sure. And Dani smokes pot,.
Ah that would be smok(ed) - note the *past tense* why do you say
"smokes" as if I do it now?
And also - why only mention me? There's plenty of others here on
this
group who have smoked in the past.
I think we should get Saint Isadore's expert opinion on this.
There's others also, Randy.. 5 that I know of for sure (because they
mentioned it here).. but unlike you-know-who, I won't say their
names.
Dani
One of them was me. I am not ashamed of it...but I gave it up in my
early
20s, which was 20 years ago. It just made me want to nod off.
Jane
So you committed a crime 20 years ago jane (by tw standards)?
I guess I did.
No you didn't. They're MY standards after all..
Oh, well, I was never arrested.
Exactly.. and you aren't restricted from entering the US due to your
criminal record.
I suppose I commit crimes
daily, as I drive with a heavy foot, :)!
Naught naughty. For the record I regard that as worse than smoking dope -
at
least you only hurt yuorself if you take drugs, but failure to observe
speed
limits endagers others..
Maybe you don't know how to drive at higher speeds...I do. Never caused an
accident in almost 30 years of driving. The limits on our expressways are
lower than what the road is engineered for.
Jane
Bottom line, do you think it is a criminal act that makes you a
criminal?
You know tw. He gets these obsessions in his head
you and me both, eh? ;-)
and won't let them go
come hell or high water.
Nope, I simply object to being falsely accused of "anti-semite" by anyone
who isn't prepared to even explain their rationale. As you yourself
pointed
out, none of the posts Jean presented as evidence for his "anti-semtism"
accusations actually contained any anti-semitism.
10 years from now he'll still be harping on it! I
LOL! Like Jean wouldn't, if it weren't for the fact he'll be wormfood in
10
years...
would just ignore him (I know its hard....)
He is now, mainly because Amy asked him some rather difficult questions
about why he doesn't label Tony an anti-semite, even though he clearly
reads
and agrees with many extreme right wing, hate promoting anti-semitic
sites..
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Jean has no decency. Period. J. Re: Answer this Jean...Re: The next four years |
19 Nov 2004 02:15:06 AM |
|
|
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:8Kend.29953$rc.1792807@news20.bellglobal.com...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:cnih95$ski$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Go3nd.26741$rc.1557521@news20.bellglobal.com...
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:X_Wmd.4695464$ic1.447965@news.easynews.com...
Jane a écrit:
"Dani" <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5r1op0d79aenn735843hk43h3hjtpfr4n5@4ax.com...
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:49:53 GMT, "R. Foreman"
<eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
Dani <dani7200@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:59:39 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
You mean my smoking pit in the 70s. Sure. And Dani smokes pot,.
Ah that would be smok(ed) - note the *past tense* why do you say
"smokes" as if I do it now?
And also - why only mention me? There's plenty of others here
on
this
group who have smoked in the past.
I think we should get Saint Isadore's expert opinion on this.
There's others also, Randy.. 5 that I know of for sure (because
they
mentioned it here).. but unlike you-know-who, I won't say their
names.
Dani
One of them was me. I am not ashamed of it...but I gave it up in
my
early
20s, which was 20 years ago. It just made me want to nod off.
Jane
So you committed a crime 20 years ago jane (by tw standards)?
I guess I did.
No you didn't. They're MY standards after all..
Oh, well, I was never arrested.
Exactly.. and you aren't restricted from entering the US due to your
criminal record.
I suppose I commit crimes
daily, as I drive with a heavy foot, :)!
Naught naughty. For the record I regard that as worse than smoking
dope -
at
least you only hurt yuorself if you take drugs, but failure to observe
speed
limits endagers others..
Maybe you don't know how to drive at higher speeds
I know when it's appropriate too. Maybe you can't read speed limit signs? I
knwo I can.
...I do. Never caused an
accident in almost 30 years of driving. The limits on our expressways are
lower than what the road is engineered for.
How do you work that out?
Jane
Bottom line, do you think it is a criminal act that makes you a
criminal?
You know tw. He gets these obsessions in his head
you and me both, eh? ;-)
and won't let them go
come hell or high water.
Nope, I simply object to being falsely accused of "anti-semite" by
anyone
who isn't prepared to even explain their rationale. As you yourself
pointed
out, none of the posts Jean presented as evidence for his "anti-semtism"
accusations actually contained any anti-semitism.
10 years from now he'll still be harping on it! I
LOL! Like Jean wouldn't, if it weren't for the fact he'll be wormfood in
10
years...
would just ignore him (I know its hard....)
He is now, mainly because Amy asked him some rather difficult questions
about why he doesn't label Tony an anti-semite, even though he clearly
reads
and agrees with many extreme right wing, hate promoting anti-semitic
sites..
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: Jean has no decency. Period. J. Re: Answer this Jean...Re: The next four years |
19 Nov 2004 09:22:42 AM |
|
|
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:cnk9rd$nh2$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:8Kend.29953$rc.1792807@news20.bellglobal.com...
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:cnih95$ski$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...
"Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Go3nd.26741$rc.1557521@news20.bellglobal.com...
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:X_Wmd.4695464$ic1.447965@news.easynews.com...
Jane a écrit:
"Dani" <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5r1op0d79aenn735843hk43h3hjtpfr4n5@4ax.com...
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:49:53 GMT, "R. Foreman"
<eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
Dani <dani7200@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:59:39 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
You mean my smoking pit in the 70s. Sure. And Dani smokes
pot,.
Ah that would be smok(ed) - note the *past tense* why do you
say
"smokes" as if I do it now?
And also - why only mention me? There's plenty of others here
on
this
group who have smoked in the past.
I think we should get Saint Isadore's expert opinion on this.
There's others also, Randy.. 5 that I know of for sure (because
they
mentioned it here).. but unlike you-know-who, I won't say their
names.
Dani
One of them was me. I am not ashamed of it...but I gave it up
in
my
early
20s, which was 20 years ago. It just made me want to nod off.
Jane
So you committed a crime 20 years ago jane (by tw standards)?
I guess I did.
No you didn't. They're MY standards after all..
Oh, well, I was never arrested.
Exactly.. and you aren't restricted from entering the US due to your
criminal record.
I suppose I commit crimes
daily, as I drive with a heavy foot, :)!
Naught naughty. For the record I regard that as worse than smoking
dope -
at
least you only hurt yuorself if you take drugs, but failure to observe
speed
limits endagers others..
Maybe you don't know how to drive at higher speeds
I know when it's appropriate too. Maybe you can't read speed limit signs?
I
knwo I can.
I most certainly can. And I don't go racing through residential areas,
BTW...only on the highway.
...I do. Never caused an
accident in almost 30 years of driving. The limits on our expressways
are
lower than what the road is engineered for.
How do you work that out?
It has been reported as such. I am not a civil engineer, of course, but you
can also tell by the "feel" of the road. Perhaps you don't drive enough?
Jane
Jane
Bottom line, do you think it is a criminal act that makes you a
criminal?
You know tw. He gets these obsessions in his head
you and me both, eh? ;-)
and won't let them go
come hell or high water.
Nope, I simply object to being falsely accused of "anti-semite" by
anyone
who isn't prepared to even explain their rationale. As you yourself
pointed
out, none of the posts Jean presented as evidence for his
"anti-semtism"
accusations actually contained any anti-semitism.
10 years from now he'll still be harping on it! I
LOL! Like Jean wouldn't, if it weren't for the fact he'll be wormfood
in
10
years...
would just ignore him (I know its hard....)
He is now, mainly because Amy asked him some rather difficult
questions
about why he doesn't label Tony an anti-semite, even though he clearly
reads
and agrees with many extreme right wing, hate promoting anti-semitic
sites..
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: Jean has no decency. Period. J. Re: Answer this Jean...Re: The next four years |
19 Nov 2004 07:25:46 PM |
|
|
"tw" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:<cnk9rd$nh2$1@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>...
Maybe you don't know how to drive at higher speeds
I know when it's appropriate too. Maybe you can't read speed limit signs? I
knwo I can.
"knwo I can?"
"knwo"
teh, teh, teh, teh, teh, teh, teh, - spit it our spazz ;)
...Showing off your tard skills again terrorist loving fart? lol.
Here what does this say?
PSTO
or SPOT
I bet you when you are on the road ( My gosh, what a scary thought)
the signs look exactly like that.
BTW. Waaaatttttzzz Up terrorist *****? ;)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Jean has no decency. Period. J. Re: Answer this Jean...Re: Thenext four years |
18 Nov 2004 10:50:58 AM |
|
|
Jane a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:X_Wmd.4695464$ic1.447965@news.easynews.com...
Jane a écrit:
"Dani" <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5r1op0d79aenn735843hk43h3hjtpfr4n5@4ax.com...
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:49:53 GMT, "R. Foreman"
<eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
Dani <dani7200@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:59:39 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
You mean my smoking pit in the 70s. Sure. And Dani smokes pot,.
Ah that would be smok(ed) - note the *past tense* why do you say
"smokes" as if I do it now?
And also - why only mention me? There's plenty of others here on this
group who have smoked in the past.
I think we should get Saint Isadore's expert opinion on this.
There's others also, Randy.. 5 that I know of for sure (because they
mentioned it here).. but unlike you-know-who, I won't say their names.
Dani
One of them was me. I am not ashamed of it...but I gave it up in my
early
20s, which was 20 years ago. It just made me want to nod off.
Jane
So you committed a crime 20 years ago jane (by tw standards)?
I guess I did. Oh, well, I was never arrested. I suppose I commit crimes
daily, as I drive with a heavy foot, :)!
Bottom line, do you think it is a criminal act that makes you a criminal?
You know tw. He gets these obsessions in his head and won't let them go
come hell or high water. 10 years from now he'll still be harping on it!
Hehe
I
would just ignore him (I know its hard....)
Well, maybe not that hard, this is what I do since yesterday. Not much
else to do with the annoying little troll. There is indeed no point
repeating the same thing over and over with someone who won't hear.
J.
Jane
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Jean has no decency. Period. J. Re: Answer this Jean...Re: The next four years |
19 Nov 2004 02:20:20 AM |
|
|
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:Sp4nd.5309123$6p.860416@news.easynews.com...
Jane a écrit:
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:X_Wmd.4695464$ic1.447965@news.easynews.com...
Jane a écrit:
"Dani" <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5r1op0d79aenn735843hk43h3hjtpfr4n5@4ax.com...
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:49:53 GMT, "R. Foreman"
<eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
Dani <dani7200@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:59:39 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
You mean my smoking pit in the 70s. Sure. And Dani smokes pot,.
Ah that would be smok(ed) - note the *past tense* why do you say
"smokes" as if I do it now?
And also - why only mention me? There's plenty of others here on
this
group who have smoked in the past.
I think we should get Saint Isadore's expert opinion on this.
There's others also, Randy.. 5 that I know of for sure (because they
mentioned it here).. but unlike you-know-who, I won't say their names.
Dani
One of them was me. I am not ashamed of it...but I gave it up in my
early
20s, which was 20 years ago. It just made me want to nod off.
Jane
So you committed a crime 20 years ago jane (by tw standards)?
I guess I did. Oh, well, I was never arrested. I suppose I commit
crimes
daily, as I drive with a heavy foot, :)!
Bottom line, do you think it is a criminal act that makes you a
criminal?
You know tw. He gets these obsessions in his head and won't let them go
come hell or high water. 10 years from now he'll still be harping on
it!
Hehe
I
would just ignore him (I know its hard....)
Well, maybe not that hard, this is what I do since yesterday. Not much
else to do with the annoying little troll. There is indeed no point
repeating the same thing over and over with someone who won't hear.
Indeed, you never coudl come up with any evidence for your filthy
accusations could you?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Jean has no decency. Period. J. Re: Answer this Jean...Re: The next four years |
18 Nov 2004 04:09:15 AM |
|
|
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:X_Wmd.4695464$ic1.447965@news.easynews.com...
Jane a écrit:
"Dani" <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5r1op0d79aenn735843hk43h3hjtpfr4n5@4ax.com...
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:49:53 GMT, "R. Foreman"
<eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
Dani <dani7200@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:59:39 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
You mean my smoking pit in the 70s. Sure. And Dani smokes pot,.
Ah that would be smok(ed) - note the *past tense* why do you say
"smokes" as if I do it now?
And also - why only mention me? There's plenty of others here on this
group who have smoked in the past.
I think we should get Saint Isadore's expert opinion on this.
There's others also, Randy.. 5 that I know of for sure (because they
mentioned it here).. but unlike you-know-who, I won't say their names.
Dani
One of them was me. I am not ashamed of it...but I gave it up in my
early
20s, which was 20 years ago. It just made me want to nod off.
Jane
So you committed a crime 20 years ago jane (by tw standards)?
Nope, she doesn't have a criminal record for it. how many more times,
criminal?
Bottom line, do you think it is a criminal act that makes you a criminal?
It's a criminal record that makes you a criminal, criminal. Or are you
claiming the US is WRONG to restrict yoru entry due to your crimes? That
woudl be a terrorist-supporting, anti-American weasel stance you were
taking, by your own definition...probably anti-semitic too!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Jean has no decency. Period. J. Re: Answer this Jean...Re: The next four years |
18 Nov 2004 12:04:38 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 00:29:43 -0500, "Jane" <pushlinque@hotmail.com>
wrote:
"Dani" <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5r1op0d79aenn735843hk43h3hjtpfr4n5@4ax.com...
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:49:53 GMT, "R. Foreman"
<eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
Dani <dani7200@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:59:39 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
You mean my smoking pit in the 70s. Sure. And Dani smokes pot,.
Ah that would be smok(ed) - note the *past tense* why do you say
"smokes" as if I do it now?
And also - why only mention me? There's plenty of others here on this
group who have smoked in the past.
I think we should get Saint Isadore's expert opinion on this.
There's others also, Randy.. 5 that I know of for sure (because they
mentioned it here).. but unlike you-know-who, I won't say their names.
Dani
One of them was me. I am not ashamed of it...but I gave it up in my early
20s, which was 20 years ago. It just made me want to nod off.
I'm not ashamed of it either. I was a hippie living between '93 (13)
to '98 (18) .. ;) My late best-friend and I always said we were born
in the wrong generation.
Dani
Jane
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Jean has no decency. Period. J. Re: Answer this Jean...Re: Thenext four years |
17 Nov 2004 11:23:21 PM |
|
|
Dani a écrit:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:49:53 GMT, "R. Foreman"
<eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
Dani <dani7200@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:59:39 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
You mean my smoking pit in the 70s. Sure. And Dani smokes pot,.
Ah that would be smok(ed) - note the *past tense* why do you say
"smokes" as if I do it now?
And also - why only mention me? There's plenty of others here on this
group who have smoked in the past.
I think we should get Saint Isadore's expert opinion on this.
There's others also, Randy.. 5 that I know of for sure (because they
mentioned it here).. but unlike you-know-who, I won't say their names.
Dani
I hadn't noticed.
But were they branded criminals by the little *****?
I didn't think so.
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Jean has no decency. Period. J. Re: Answer this Jean...Re: The next four years |
18 Nov 2004 03:27:14 AM |
|
|
"Jean Guernon" <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote in message
news:clWmd.5285158$6p.854134@news.easynews.com...
Dani a écrit:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:49:53 GMT, "R. Foreman"
<eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net> wrote:
Dani <dani7200@hotmail.com> Spat the Words
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:59:39 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
You mean my smoking pit in the 70s. Sure. And Dani smokes pot,.
Ah that would be smok(ed) - note the *past tense* why do you say
"smokes" as if I do it now?
And also - why only mention me? There's plenty of others here on this
group who have smoked in the past.
I think we should get Saint Isadore's expert opinion on this.
There's others also, Randy.. 5 that I know of for sure (because they
mentioned it here).. but unlike you-know-who, I won't say their names.
Dani
I hadn't noticed.
But were they branded criminals
Do they have criminal records, criminal?
by the little
Little like a four-year old?
*****, I didn't think
You never do
..
so
So go and ***** yourself?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Grantland" |
|
| Title: Re: Jean has no decency. Period. J. Re: Answer this Jean...Re: The next four years |
17 Nov 2004 06:54:26 PM |
|
|
Dani <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:59:39 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
You mean my smoking pit in the 70s. Sure. And Dani smokes pot,.
Ah that would be smok(ed) - note the *past tense* why do you say
"smokes" as if I do it now?
And also - why only mention me? There's plenty of others here on this
group who have smoked in the past.
Dani
I nsmoke it up. All the time.
wally
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Jean has no decency. Period. J. Re: Answer this Jean...Re: The next four years |
17 Nov 2004 08:04:22 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 00:54:26 GMT, (Grantland)
wrote:
Dani <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:59:39 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
You mean my smoking pit in the 70s. Sure. And Dani smokes pot,.
Ah that would be smok(ed) - note the *past tense* why do you say
"smokes" as if I do it now?
And also - why only mention me? There's plenty of others here on this
group who have smoked in the past.
Dani
I nsmoke it up. All the time.
I did in Amsterdam .. :) best ***** I've ever had. - (*****, Tony -
it's legal there!)
...it was affecting my memory back in the day which is one of the
reasons I stopped. But never will I deny that I loved the stuff!
Dani
wally
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Jean has no decency. Period. J. Re: Answer this Jean...Re: The next four years |
17 Nov 2004 08:49:54 PM |
|
|
In article <4i0op05p6g7li1t984p49trdjth4auns8l@4ax.com>, Dani <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 00:54:26 GMT, (Grantland)
wrote:
Dani <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:59:39 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
You mean my smoking pit in the 70s. Sure. And Dani smokes pot,.
Ah that would be smok(ed) - note the *past tense* why do you say
"smokes" as if I do it now?
And also - why only mention me? There's plenty of others here on this
group who have smoked in the past.
Dani
I nsmoke it up. All the time.
I did in Amsterdam .. :) best ***** I've ever had. - (*****, Tony -
it's legal there!)
...it was affecting my memory back in the day which is one of the
reasons I stopped. But never will I deny that I loved the stuff!
Jeez, I think I would hate that. I had morphine after surgery once for
painkillers - it was horrible to have things messed up and kind of "out there"
like they weren't quite real.
But, OTOH, lots of people hate spinning rides that make them dizzy, and I just
love them - I'd love to go into one of those centrifugal force things they have
at NASA!
Vive la difference!
:-)
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: Jean has no decency. Period. J. Re: Answer this Jean...Re: The next four years |
17 Nov 2004 11:28:12 PM |
|
|
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:m5Umd.373$1u.350@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
In article <4i0op05p6g7li1t984p49trdjth4auns8l@4ax.com>, Dani
<dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 00:54:26 GMT, (Grantland)
wrote:
Dani <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:59:39 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
You mean my smoking pit in the 70s. Sure. And Dani smokes pot,.
Ah that would be smok(ed) - note the *past tense* why do you say
"smokes" as if I do it now?
And also - why only mention me? There's plenty of others here on this
group who have smoked in the past.
Dani
I nsmoke it up. All the time.
I did in Amsterdam .. :) best ***** I've ever had. - (*****, Tony -
it's legal there!)
...it was affecting my memory back in the day which is one of the
reasons I stopped. But never will I deny that I loved the stuff!
Jeez, I think I would hate that. I had morphine after surgery once for
painkillers - it was horrible to have things messed up and kind of "out
there"
like they weren't quite real.
But, OTOH, lots of people hate spinning rides that make them dizzy, and I
just
love them - I'd love to go into one of those centrifugal force things they
have
at NASA!
Vive la difference!
:-)
Woods
Indeed! I loved my post-Caesarian morphine! :)
Jane
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Jean has no decency. Period. J. Re: Answer this Jean...Re: The next four years |
17 Nov 2004 08:05:06 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 00:54:26 GMT, (Grantland)
wrote:
Dani <dani7200@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:59:39 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
You mean my smoking pit in the 70s. Sure. And Dani smokes pot,.
Ah that would be smok(ed) - note the *past tense* why do you say
"smokes" as if I do it now?
And also - why only mention me? There's plenty of others here on this
group who have smoked in the past.
Dani
I nsmoke it up. All the time.
I did in Amsterdam .. :) best ***** I've ever had. - (*****, Tony -
it's legal there!)
...it was affecting my memory back in the day which is one of the
reasons I stopped. But never will I deny that I loved the stuff!
Dani
wally
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Jean has no decency. Period. J. Re: Answer this Jean...Re: Thenext four years |
17 Nov 2004 08:50:44 PM |
|
|
Dani a écrit:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:59:39 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
You mean my smoking pit in the 70s. Sure. And Dani smokes pot,.
Ah that would be smok(ed) - note the *past tense* why do you say
"smokes" as if I do it now?
And also - why only mention me? There's plenty of others here on this
group who have smoked in the past.
Dani
Sure, I don't know any who said it here, but no doubt most of the people
here smoked pot in the past, and it is not a crime. But there is nothing
one can convey to this little ***** tw.
Can't you explain to him that having pot is not a crime whether you get
caught or not?
J.
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Jean has no decency. Period. J. Re: Answer this Jean...Re: Thenext four years |
18 Nov 2004 04:51:26 PM |
|
|
In article <86Umd.5280375$6p.853216@news.easynews.com>, Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
Dani a écrit:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:59:39 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
You mean my smoking pit in the 70s. Sure. And Dani smokes pot,.
Ah that would be smok(ed) - note the *past tense* why do you say
"smokes" as if I do it now?
And also - why only mention me? There's plenty of others here on this
group who have smoked in the past.
Dani
Sure, I don't know any who said it here, but no doubt most of the people
here smoked pot in the past, and it is not a crime. But there is nothing
one can convey to this little ***** tw.
Can't you explain to him that having pot is not a crime whether you get
caught or not?
It is a crime to possess pot in many parts of the States, Jean, even in small
amounts. In some states it's been decriminalized, so it's similar to a speeding
ticket.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jean Guernon" |
|
| Title: Re: Jean has no decency. Period. J. Re: Answer this Jean...Re: Thenext four years |
18 Nov 2004 11:13:21 PM |
|
|
Woodswun a écrit:
In article <86Umd.5280375$6p.853216@news.easynews.com>, Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
Dani a écrit:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:59:39 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
You mean my smoking pit in the 70s. Sure. And Dani smokes pot,.
Ah that would be smok(ed) - note the *past tense* why do you say
"smokes" as if I do it now?
And also - why only mention me? There's plenty of others here on this
group who have smoked in the past.
Dani
Sure, I don't know any who said it here, but no doubt most of the people
here smoked pot in the past, and it is not a crime. But there is nothing
one can convey to this little ***** tw.
Can't you explain to him that having pot is not a crime whether you get
caught or not?
It is a crime to possess pot in many parts of the States, Jean, even in small
amounts. In some states it's been decriminalized, so it's similar to a speeding
ticket.
Woods
Bah, it is an infraction. The question is, would that act make you
criminal. Answer truthfully Woods.
J.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: Jean has no decency. Period. J. Re: Answer this Jean...Re: Thenext four years |
19 Nov 2004 06:07:23 PM |
|
|
In article <Rhfnd.3236663$yk.504699@news.easynews.com>, Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
Woodswun a écrit:
In article <86Umd.5280375$6p.853216@news.easynews.com>, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
Dani a écrit:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:59:39 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
You mean my smoking pit in the 70s. Sure. And Dani smokes pot,.
Ah that would be smok(ed) - note the *past tense* why do you say
"smokes" as if I do it now?
And also - why only mention me? There's plenty of others here on this
group who have smoked in the past.
Dani
Sure, I don't know any who said it here, but no doubt most of the people
here smoked pot in the past, and it is not a crime. But there is nothing
one can convey to this little ***** tw.
Can't you explain to him that having pot is not a crime whether you get
caught or not?
It is a crime to possess pot in many parts of the States, Jean, even in small
amounts. In some states it's been decriminalized, so it's similar to a
speeding
ticket.
Woods
Bah, it is an infraction. The question is, would that act make you
criminal. Answer truthfully Woods.
Are you asking me technically/legally, or do I think it *ought* to make you a
criminal? (And I only thought to ask that because I read another post of
yours).
Yes, in some places, possession of pot is a misdemeanor, which technically makes
you a criminal if you are caught and convicted.
No, I do not think possession of any kind of drug should be a criminal offense,
any more than I think possession of a gun should be a criminal offense. I think
the government should keep it's nose out of people's private business and let
them live or screw up their lives any way they want. A different matter if
someone is messing with someone *else's* life, but that's not what we're talking
about here.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mark" |
|
| Title: Re: Jean has no decency. Period. J. Re: Answer this Jean...Re: The next four years |
20 Nov 2004 09:33:13 AM |
|
|
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:%Uvnd.4026$1u.3255@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
In article <Rhfnd.3236663$yk.504699@news.easynews.com>, Jean "Pedophile"
Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
Bah, it is an infraction. The question is, would that act make you
criminal. Answer truthfully Woods.
Are you asking me technically/legally, or do I think it *ought* to make
you a
criminal? (And I only thought to ask that because I read another post of
yours).
Yes, in some places, possession of pot is a misdemeanor, which technically
makes
you a criminal if you are caught and convicted.
No, I do not think possession of any kind of drug should be a criminal
offense,
any more than I think possession of a gun should be a criminal offense. I
think
the government should keep it's nose out of people's private business and
let
them live or screw up their lives any way they want. A different matter
if
someone is messing with someone *else's* life, but that's not what we're
talking
about here.
There are people in jail now who were busted with pot in the '70s.
There are MANY people still in jail for 'cultivation'.
From a 'Big Brother' perspective... ANYTHING that takes away from the GNP is
a bad thing and should be eliminated... this includes Drugs, Alcohol, and
ALL Hobbies (outside of Christian Approved Religious Activities).
Since the United States has decided it will not compete with China in
colonizing the planets, and has instead shifted it's focus on converting
everyone to Jesus Worshipping, Women Hating, Oil Loving Baptists... the GNP
will be spent accordingly.
Jean "The Pedophile" Geurnon is wrong... pot causes genetic mutations. It's
not good for recreational use for people of Child Bearing age.
Better that ya'll enjoy the United States new Opium source... spend your
hours, days, weeks, months, and years in the hinterland between
consciousness and death... spend your time dreaming that you can taste
sound, hear colours, smell sunlight. Opium Dens were once all the rage...
look for one near you soon!
A new paradigm shift has been noted... the Elite now understand that the
Earth has limited resources. It is no longer acceptable for an individual
to squander important resources (like food and water) in the pursuit of
Individual Happiness.
In the short term... if ones 'drug of preference' helps to finance those
Military Endeavors that help bring Jesus, Women Hating, or Oil to the United
States, then these drugs will be briefly overlooked... though Officially
condemned.
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Jean has no decency. Period. J. Re: Answer this Jean...Re: The next four years |
21 Nov 2004 07:34:16 AM |
|
|
"Mark"
wrote:
There are people in jail now who were >busted with pot in the '70s.
There are MANY people still in jail for >'cultivation'.
Anyone who is still in jail from the 70's had to be involved with smuggling or
gowing tons of the stuff.
pot causes genetic mutations. It's
not good for recreational use for people >of Child Bearing age.
Of course it does, among other things, like depression, panic attacks and other
psychiatric aliments.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: Jean has no decency. Period. J. Re: Answer this Jean...Re: The next four years |
21 Nov 2004 08:53:31 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041121083416.08086.00001010@mb-m05.aol.com...
"Mark"
wrote:
There are people in jail now who were >busted with pot in the '70s.
There are MANY people still in jail for >'cultivation'.
Anyone who is still in jail from the 70's had to be involved with
smuggling or
gowing tons of the stuff.
pot causes genetic mutations. It's
not good for recreational use for people >of Child Bearing age.
Of course it does, among other things, like depression, panic attacks and
other
psychiatric aliments.
Tony
It also has to affect your lungs! I've read it has more tar than
cigarettes...plus you hold it in your lungs, which you don't do with cigs.
It also makes people lethargic and un-ambitious.
I can see it for medical use, as some people with MS, AIDS, Glaucoma, etc,
swear by it. It is too bad it can't be processed into pill form so that it
wouldn't have to be smoked.
Jane
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Jean has no decency. Period. J. Re: Answer this Jean...Re: The next four years |
22 Nov 2004 08:41:40 AM |
|
|
"Jane"
wrote:
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041121083416.08086.00001010@mb-m05.aol.com...
"Mark"
wrote:
There are people in jail now who were >busted with pot in the '70s.
There are MANY people still in jail for >'cultivation'.
Anyone who is still in jail from the 70's had to be involved with
smuggling or
gowing tons of the stuff.
pot causes genetic mutations. It's
not good for recreational use for people >of Child Bearing age.
Of course it does, among other things, like depression, panic attacks and
other
psychiatric aliments.
Tony
It also has to affect your lungs! I've read >it has more tar than
cigarettes...plus you hold it in your lungs, >which you don't do with cigs.
It also makes people lethargic and >un-ambitious.
True.
I can see it for medical use, as some >people with MS, AIDS, Glaucoma, etc,
swear by it. It is too bad it can't be >processed into pill form so that it
wouldn't have to be smoked.
Jane
There are other more effective medications for these problems, but they don't
provide the same "high" which is what this issue is all about.
Also, it has been put into pill form "Marinol" but again it doesn't provide the
same "high" so it is discredited by those who want Pot to be totally legal.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Su Zanadu" |
|
| Title: Re: Jean has no decency. Period. J. Re: Answer this Jean...Re: The... |
21 Nov 2004 09:01:10 PM |
|
|
Jane wrote:
I can see it for medical use, as some
people with MS, AIDS, Glaucoma, etc,
swear by it. It is too bad it can't be
processed into pill form so that it
wouldn't have to be smoked.
It can and has been.
It is also very tasty in Italian dishes and brownies.
SuZanne
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: Jean has no decency. Period. J. Re: Answer this Jean...Re: The next four years |
20 Nov 2004 02:39:13 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 00:07:23 GMT, (Woodswun)
wrote:
In article <Rhfnd.3236663$yk.504699@news.easynews.com>, Jean Guernon <jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
Woodswun a écrit:
In article <86Umd.5280375$6p.853216@news.easynews.com>, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
Dani a écrit:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:59:39 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
You mean my smoking pit in the 70s. Sure. And Dani smokes pot,.
Ah that would be smok(ed) - note the *past tense* why do you say
"smokes" as if I do it now?
And also - why only mention me? There's plenty of others here on this
group who have smoked in the past.
Dani
Sure, I don't know any who said it here, but no doubt most of the people
here smoked pot in the past, and it is not a crime. But there is nothing
one can convey to this little ***** tw.
Can't you explain to him that having pot is not a crime whether you get
caught or not?
It is a crime to possess pot in many parts of the States, Jean, even in small
amounts. In some states it's been decriminalized, so it's similar to a
speeding
ticket.
Woods
Bah, it is an infraction. The question is, would that act make you
criminal. Answer truthfully Woods.
Are you asking me technically/legally, or do I think it *ought* to make you a
criminal? (And I only thought to ask that because I read another post of
yours).
Yes, in some places, possession of pot is a misdemeanor, which technically makes
you a criminal if you are caught and convicted.
No, I do not think possession of any kind of drug should be a criminal offense,
any more than I think possession of a gun should be a criminal offense. I think
the government should keep it's nose out of people's private business and let
them live or screw up their lives any way they want. A different matter if
someone is messing with someone *else's* life, but that's not what we're talking
about here.
Couldn't agree more, Woods (I always find myself agreeing with you! ;)
And another thing - how could they put addicts in jail? They should
be in *rehab*! And alcohol is legal - while weed is not. Alcohol has
to be one of the very worst drugs out there (and yes, it *is* a drug
for others who don't consider it such. It's a legal, socially
acceptable drug.)
What a backwards, screwed up system IMO.
Dani
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: Jean has no decency. Period. J. Re: Answer this Jean...Re: The next four years |
21 Nov 2004 07:29:04 AM |
|
|
Dani
wrote:
woodswun@tepidmail.com (Woodswun)
wrote:
In article <Rhfnd.3236663$yk.504699@news.easynews.com>, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
Woodswun a écrit:
In article <86Umd.5280375$6p.853216@news.easynews.com>, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
Dani a écrit:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:59:39 GMT, Jean Guernon
<jguernon@globetrotter.net> wrote:
You mean my smoking pit in the 70s. Sure. And Dani smokes pot,.
Ah that would be smok(ed) - note the *past tense* why do you say
"smokes" as if I do it now?
And also - why only mention me? There's plenty of others here on this
group who have smoked in the past.
Dani
Sure, I don't know any who said it here, but no doubt most of the people
here smoked pot in the past, and it is not a crime. But there is nothing
one can convey to this little ***** tw.
Can't you explain to him that having pot is not a crime whether you get
caught or not?
It is a crime to possess pot in many parts of the States, Jean, even in
small
amounts. In some states it's been decriminalized, so it's similar to a
speeding
ticket.
Woods
Bah, it is an infraction. The question is, would that act make you
criminal. Answer truthfully Woods.
Are you asking me technically/legally, or do I think it *ought* to make you
a
criminal? (And I only thought to ask that because I read another post of
yours).
Yes, in some places, possession of pot is a misdemeanor, which technically
makes
you a criminal if you are caught and convicted.
No, I do not think possession of any kind of drug should be a criminal
offense,
any more than I think possession of a gun should be a criminal offense. I
think
the government should keep it's nose out of people's private business and
let
them live or screw up their lives any way they want. A different matter if
someone is messing with someone *else's* life, but that's not what we're
talking
about here.
Couldn't agree more, Woods (I always >find myself agreeing with you! ;)
And another thing - how could they put addicts in jail? They should
be in *rehab*! And alcohol is legal - while weed is not. Alcohol has
to be one of the very worst drugs out >there (and yes, it *is* a drug
for others who don't consider it such. It's >a legal, socially acceptable
drug.)
What a backwards, screwed up system >IMO.
Dani
You Liberals are the one's who are screwed up and backwards; if we were to
legalize drugs you would see the use of all drugs rise dramatically, crime
would rise along with it and the system would be overwhelmed.
But I think that's exactly what you wacky Liberals would like to see happen to
our society.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: Jean has no decency. Period. J. Re: Answer this Jean...Re: The next four years |
22 Nov 2004 03:57:44 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041121082904.08086.00001009@mb-m05.aol.com...
You Liberals are the one's who are screwed up and backwards; if we were to
legalize drugs you would see the use of all drugs rise dramatically, crime
would rise along with it and the system would be overwhelmed.
But I think that's exactly what you wacky Liberals would like to see
happen to
our society.
Tony
Besides, if drugs were made legal, the street value of Tony's oxycodone
stash woudl plummet!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
