Hi.
I haven't read it but has anyone here done so? I'm curious as to who it
claims is the "AntiChrist". Is it BUSH????
.
|
|
| User: "me" |
|
| Title: Re: "The Nostradamus Code" |
04 Jan 2007 09:58:48 PM |
|
|
It's clearly not BUSH!!!
The anti-Christ must be a Muslim, don't you think? Do you pay
attention to exactly what Bush is fighting? Do you see the war in
Darfur? In Somalia?
I'd say the people who blow themselves up are clearly NOT the good guys
of the world. Muslims want all the oil and all the earth...and Iran
wants to govern it.
I myself will read this when I catch up with all my new books. As far
as I can tell, the anti-Christ is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Pres. of
Iran. He denies the Holocaust ever happened yet wants to wipe Israel
off the map. He's constantly threatening Europe and the US, and he's
defiantly building nuclear weapons, with Russia's assistance.
Now I could be wrong, but it sure as hell isn't Bush.
me
mike3 wrote:
Hi.
I haven't read it but has anyone here done so? I'm curious as to who it
claims is the "AntiChrist". Is it BUSH????
.
|
|
|
| User: "nostradamus262" |
|
| Title: Re: "The Nostradamus Code" |
06 Jan 2007 10:27:12 AM |
|
|
me wrote:
It's clearly not BUSH!!!
Bush not anti GOD? LoL
the hell he's not... he certainly fits someone who is ANTI GOD or ANTI
CHRIST if being antichrist is against God. But then, there were many
Christs in hebrew lore. So one should analyze the word as MN used it.
Ante and Christos.
but bush, a member of skull and bones... lied to his people to create
the most evil war in the UNITED STATES HISTORY thats killed 100's of
thousands and was only done to position the US to attack IRAN soon,,,
and worst of all, part of the greatest conspiracy perhaps of all time
which killed 3000 of his own people on 911. CONTROLLED DEMOLITION OF
THE WTC.
its been shown how Mabus can easily connect to Bush using simple codes
in deciphering MN writings.
now as to ANTICHRIST being misunderstoood, lets see.... for one, most
have a retarded concept of the term to begin with if JC didn't exist as
the church has brainwashed its followers to believe for millenia.
I think fans of sollog explained back in 1996 here that ANTI CHRIST is
a term conceived/created solely by christians based on a
corrupt/retarded concept of God who they believe to be Jesus and Gods
son at the same time. Sure....
Now sollog has argued the New Testament was created to mock Gods Law in
the Old Testament since it was nothing more than a fairy tale and no
one named Jesus Christ ever existed. If one realizes that Jesus' last
testament was his claim to be the Morning Star in Revelations, then he
would have to be Lucifer since that is Satans AKA.
If this is true, then one primary meaning of Anti Christ would be
someone PRO GOD or ANTI JESUS CHRIST, not ANTI GOD since being ANTI
JESUS CHRIST would then be someone against or the opposite of Lucifer
if that was Jesus aka and was the real wolf in sheeps clothing.
Clever were the writers of the NT... nothing more than a work of
fiction thats Enslaved billions.
"I came to bring a sword of division"
and people wonder why xtians, muslims, and jews are full of such evil
and hate and can't stop fighting.
yeah, some prince of peace
Fools
The anti-Christ must be a Muslim, don't you think? Do you pay
attention to exactly what Bush is fighting? Do you see the war in
Darfur? In Somalia?
I'd say the people who blow themselves up are clearly NOT the good guys
of the world. Muslims want all the oil and all the earth...and Iran
wants to govern it.
I myself will read this when I catch up with all my new books. As far
as I can tell, the anti-Christ is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Pres. of
Iran. He denies the Holocaust ever happened yet wants to wipe Israel
off the map. He's constantly threatening Europe and the US, and he's
defiantly building nuclear weapons, with Russia's assistance.
Now I could be wrong, but it sure as hell isn't Bush.
me
mike3 wrote:
Hi.
I haven't read it but has anyone here done so? I'm curious as to who it
claims is the "AntiChrist". Is it BUSH????
.
|
|
|
| User: "me" |
|
| Title: Re: "The Nostradamus Code" |
11 Jan 2007 09:17:44 PM |
|
|
Drink some more Kool-Aid, you just aren't crazy enough to be
institutionalized yet. Do the right thing and get crazier.
Controlled demolition of the WTC? Oh, I get it, the 'bombs' that were
at the bases of the WTC that 'really' caused it to fall. Hmmm, such an
elaborate plan, a great illusion, and the planes were not full of
Americans but maybe remote controlled????? Haha, yea. The number dead
on 9/11, why don't you break it down instead of thowing numbers around?
How many were on the planes? Oh yea, and the controlled demolition,
such great Kool-Aid fantasy! If there were bombs, then why use planes?
Explain please.....
Iraq: How many are dead in Iraq? Hundreds of thousands? Under Saddam
Hussein, YES! Since the US invaded? NO! Can you back up this
horseshit? OOOOh i remember, the BS 'study' just before the election.
It claimed 655,000 were dead in Iraq since the invasion. Did you catch
the method used to come up with that number? Here's a link, among
many. Do some research:
http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centredaily/news/15734762.htm
Here's a more accurate site on the dead in Iraq:
http://www.iraqbodycount.org/
However, this site doesn't distinguish how many died to insurgents. If
you are paying any attention, which you clearly are NOT, you would know
that the Iranian-pushed insurgency is killing FAR MORE PEOPLE than the
US. Total % of the real number of dead is approx. 30% from the US, 70%
from Iran's insurgency disruption.
Since you do NOT stand for something, you fall for ANYTHING! Do u want
to stand for something?
Since you can't use your brain, nor can tell the difference between
propaganda and news, what use will you ever be? Just keep sipping the
Kool-Aid and find dumb girls to spend time with. There are plenty of
dumb girls! You can pimp it! But, you aren't qualified to spill
delusions into the blogs.
Oh yea, I joined this group to talk about Nostradamus, not squash
idiot's delusions. I guess I need a filtering method.
me
nostradamus262 wrote:
me wrote:
It's clearly not BUSH!!!
Bush not anti GOD? LoL
the hell he's not... he certainly fits someone who is ANTI GOD or ANTI
CHRIST if being antichrist is against God. But then, there were many
Christs in hebrew lore. So one should analyze the word as MN used it.
Ante and Christos.
but bush, a member of skull and bones... lied to his people to create
the most evil war in the UNITED STATES HISTORY thats killed 100's of
thousands and was only done to position the US to attack IRAN soon,,,
and worst of all, part of the greatest conspiracy perhaps of all time
which killed 3000 of his own people on 911. CONTROLLED DEMOLITION OF
THE WTC.
its been shown how Mabus can easily connect to Bush using simple codes
in deciphering MN writings.
now as to ANTICHRIST being misunderstoood, lets see.... for one, most
have a retarded concept of the term to begin with if JC didn't exist as
the church has brainwashed its followers to believe for millenia.
I think fans of sollog explained back in 1996 here that ANTI CHRIST is
a term conceived/created solely by christians based on a
corrupt/retarded concept of God who they believe to be Jesus and Gods
son at the same time. Sure....
Now sollog has argued the New Testament was created to mock Gods Law in
the Old Testament since it was nothing more than a fairy tale and no
one named Jesus Christ ever existed. If one realizes that Jesus' last
testament was his claim to be the Morning Star in Revelations, then he
would have to be Lucifer since that is Satans AKA.
If this is true, then one primary meaning of Anti Christ would be
someone PRO GOD or ANTI JESUS CHRIST, not ANTI GOD since being ANTI
JESUS CHRIST would then be someone against or the opposite of Lucifer
if that was Jesus aka and was the real wolf in sheeps clothing.
Clever were the writers of the NT... nothing more than a work of
fiction thats Enslaved billions.
"I came to bring a sword of division"
and people wonder why xtians, muslims, and jews are full of such evil
and hate and can't stop fighting.
yeah, some prince of peace
Fools
The anti-Christ must be a Muslim, don't you think? Do you pay
attention to exactly what Bush is fighting? Do you see the war in
Darfur? In Somalia?
I'd say the people who blow themselves up are clearly NOT the good guys
of the world. Muslims want all the oil and all the earth...and Iran
wants to govern it.
I myself will read this when I catch up with all my new books. As far
as I can tell, the anti-Christ is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Pres. of
Iran. He denies the Holocaust ever happened yet wants to wipe Israel
off the map. He's constantly threatening Europe and the US, and he's
defiantly building nuclear weapons, with Russia's assistance.
Now I could be wrong, but it sure as hell isn't Bush.
me
mike3 wrote:
Hi.
I haven't read it but has anyone here done so? I'm curious as to who it
claims is the "AntiChrist". Is it BUSH????
.
|
|
|
| User: "nostradamus262" |
|
| Title: Re: "The Nostradamus Code" |
26 Jan 2007 02:58:25 AM |
|
|
On 12 Jan, 03:17, "me" <dgod...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Drink some more Kool-Aid, you just aren't crazy enough to be
institutionalized yet. Do the right thing and get crazier.
Controlled demolition of the WTC? Oh, I get it, the 'bombs' that were
at the bases of the WTC that 'really' caused it to fall. Hmmm, such an
elaborate plan, a great illusion, and the planes were not full of
Americans but maybe remote controlled????? Haha, yea.
The number dead
on 9/11, why don't you break it down instead of thowing numbers around?
How many were on the planes? Oh yea, and the controlled demolition,
such great Kool-Aid fantasy! If there were bombs, then why use planes?
Explain please.....
Oh look, another braindead robot programmed by fox news and the repubs.
Truly sad.
and YES, i said CONTROLLED DEMOLITION YOU FUCKING PUTZ... but let me
guess, you're one of those ignorant fuks who also thinks only 2 towers
fell on 911. However the real tragedy of it all is how BLATANT and
OBVIOUS the deed was.
Even with all the FACTS being so easy to verify, the truth of what
happened is so shocking, MOST people are so weak minded, they either
can't see whats right in front of them or are just too
scared to accept the horror of it.
That along with the media's failure to fully reveal these simple facts
since they're controlled by the same faction of the US government that
was behind the conspiracy.
I could go on down the list of FACT AFTER FACT aside from just simply
watching the 3 towers fall as they did, but like most, you're obviously
too braindead to even do a simple investigation and too stupid to
understand what a fact is.
in fact me stating this isn't even intended to convince morons like you
who don't know what
a fact is to begin with. its an opportunity to wake a few up out there
in MN land about something most are just now beginning to fully
understand and wake up to due to the new alternative media blitz
emerging.
When this truth finally becomes too powerful to hide by the mainstream,
and it will,,, an uprising by american citizens in a civil war will
begin in the United States if its not destroyed first in a war thats
about to begin with IRAN.
If someone with a brain truly wants to debate this intelligently and
objectively or discuss this indepth and SEE thousands of pages of FACTS
proving this truth beyond a shadow of a doubt, i welcome any serious or
private conversations, queries and emails since most likely those with
a serious interest in the truth probably hate debating with ignorant
fuks like yourself around stalking such intellectual news groups.
Since you can't use your brain, nor can tell the difference between
propaganda and news, what use will you ever be? Just keep sipping the
Kool-Aid>
seems you and most americans have actually been the ones sippin the
real poisoned mix of kool aid poured out by the mainstream media under
zionist control.
theres a difference between NEWS and FACTS you MORON
funny how you put PROPOGANDA AND NEWS in the same category as if one is
a credible source for truth.
what a dumbfuK
hope you and the rest of america are ready for the hell sollog warned
of hitting US cities soon for being too stupid to see the WAR ON TERROR
was nothing more than a LIE created to protect Israel and for control
of Oil and Power.
9/11, a date warned ONLY by sollog and fans before it occurred; Both
Literally and through MN style writings.
and an event that ma BUS used as a basis for the WAR ON TERROR.
for those with some brains left, just remember, Tower 7 is the KEY to
the beginning of understanding the EVIL and TRUTH behind 9/11.
How stupid are Americans? An entire nation who thought Muslims attacked
them on 911 when it was
none other than their own government who are all about to pay a
terrible price for being so blind, ignorant and gullible.
sollog warned the blood of americans will spill for Is ra el in ways
most can't even begin to imagine yet. i wonder if anyone in the US
fully understands what Radiation fallout will do not only to America,
but to the planet?
mankind better start looking at their survival guides real soon.
when you see the cities sollog named fall first to nuke terror, the
real fear on this planet will begin
nostradamus262 wrote:
me wrote:
It's clearly not BUSH!!!
Bush not anti GOD? LoL
the hell he's not... he certainly fits someone who is ANTI GOD or ANTI
CHRIST if being antichrist is against God. But then, there were many
Christs in hebrew lore. So one should analyze the word as MN used it.
Ante and Christos.
but bush, a member of skull and bones... lied to his people to create
the most evil war in the UNITED STATES HISTORY thats killed 100's of
thousands and was only done to position the US to attack IRAN soon,,,
and worst of all, part of the greatest conspiracy perhaps of all time
which killed 3000 of his own people on 911. CONTROLLED DEMOLITION OF
THE WTC.
its been shown howMabuscan easily connect to Bush using simple codes
in deciphering MN writings.
now as to ANTICHRIST being misunderstoood, lets see.... for one, most
have a retarded concept of the term to begin with if JC didn't exist as
the church has brainwashed its followers to believe for millenia.
I think fans of sollog explained back in 1996 here that ANTI CHRIST is
a term conceived/created solely by christians based on a
corrupt/retarded concept of God who they believe to be Jesus and Gods
son at the same time. Sure....
Now sollog has argued the New Testament was created to mock Gods Law in
the Old Testament since it was nothing more than a fairy tale and no
one named Jesus Christ ever existed. If one realizes that Jesus' last
testament was his claim to be the Morning Star in Revelations, then he
would have to be Lucifer since that is Satans AKA.
If this is true, then one primary meaning of Anti Christ would be
someone PRO GOD or ANTI JESUS CHRIST, not ANTI GOD since being ANTI
JESUS CHRIST would then be someone against or the opposite of Lucifer
if that was Jesus aka and was the real wolf in sheeps clothing.
Clever were the writers of the NT... nothing more than a work of
fiction thats Enslaved billions.
"I came to bring a sword of division"
and people wonder why xtians, muslims, and jews are full of such evil
and hate and can't stop fighting.
yeah, some prince of peace
Fools
The anti-Christ must be a Muslim, don't you think? Do you pay
attention to exactly what Bush is fighting? Do you see the war in
Darfur? In Somalia?
I'd say the people who blow themselves up are clearly NOT the good guys
of the world. Muslims want all the oil and all the earth...and Iran
wants to govern it.
I myself will read this when I catch up with all my new books. As far
as I can tell, the anti-Christ is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Pres. of
Iran. He denies the Holocaust ever happened yet wants to wipe Israel
off the map. He's constantly threatening Europe and the US, and he's
defiantly building nuclear weapons, with Russia's assistance.
Now I could be wrong, but it sure as hell isn't Bush.
me
mike3 wrote:
Hi.
I haven't read it but has anyone here done so? I'm curious as to who it
claims is the "AntiChrist". Is it BUSH????- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -
.
|
|
|
| User: "me" |
|
| Title: Re: "The Nostradamus Code" |
20 Mar 2007 06:00:43 PM |
|
|
On Jan 26, 4:58 am, "nostradamus262" <matrixofma...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 12 Jan, 03:17, "me" <dgod...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Drink some more Kool-Aid, you just aren't crazy enough to be
institutionalized yet. Do the right thing and get crazier.
Controlled demolition of the WTC? Oh, I get it, the 'bombs' that were
at the bases of the WTC that 'really' caused it to fall. Hmmm, such an
elaborate plan, a great illusion, and the planes were not full of
Americans but maybe remote controlled????? Haha, yea.
The number dead
on 9/11, why don't you break it down instead of thowing numbers around?
How many were on the planes? Oh yea, and the controlled demolition,
such great Kool-Aid fantasy! If there were bombs, then why use planes?
Explain please.....
Oh look, another braindead robot programmed by fox news and the repubs.
Truly sad.
and YES, i said CONTROLLED DEMOLITION YOU FUCKING PUTZ... but let me
guess, you're one of those ignorant fuks who also thinks only 2 towers
fell on 911. However the real tragedy of it all is how BLATANT and
OBVIOUS the deed was.
Even with all the FACTS being so easy to verify, the truth of what
happened is so shocking, MOST people are so weak minded, they either
can't see whats right in front of them or are just too
scared to accept the horror of it.
That along with the media's failure to fully reveal these simple facts
since they're controlled by the same faction of the US government that
was behind the conspiracy.
I could go on down the list of FACT AFTER FACT aside from just simply
watching the 3 towers fall as they did, but like most, you're obviously
too braindead to even do a simple investigation and too stupid to
understand what a fact is.
in fact me stating this isn't even intended to convince morons like you
who don't know what
a fact is to begin with. its an opportunity to wake a few up out there
in MN land about something most are just now beginning to fully
understand and wake up to due to the new alternative media blitz
emerging.
When this truth finally becomes too powerful to hide by the mainstream,
and it will,,, an uprising by american citizens in a civil war will
begin in the United States if its not destroyed first in a war thats
about to begin with IRAN.
If someone with a brain truly wants to debate this intelligently and
objectively or discuss this indepth and SEE thousands of pages of FACTS
proving this truth beyond a shadow of a doubt, i welcome any serious or
private conversations, queries and emails since most likely those with
a serious interest in the truth probably hate debating with ignorant
fuks like yourself around stalking such intellectual news groups.
Since you can't use your brain, nor can tell the difference between
propaganda and news, what use will you ever be? Just keep sipping the
Kool-Aid>
seems you and most americans have actually been the ones sippin the
real poisoned mix of kool aid poured out by the mainstream media under
zionist control.
theres a difference between NEWS and FACTS you MORON
funny how you put PROPOGANDA AND NEWS in the same category as if one is
a credible source for truth.
what a dumbfuK
hope you and the rest of america are ready for the hell sollog warned
of hitting US cities soon for being too stupid to see the WAR ON TERROR
was nothing more than a LIE created to protect Israel and for control
of Oil and Power.
9/11, a date warned ONLY by sollog and fans before it occurred; Both
Literally and through MN style writings.
and an event that ma BUS used as a basis for the WAR ON TERROR.
for those with some brains left, just remember, Tower 7 is the KEY to
the beginning of understanding the EVIL and TRUTH behind 9/11.
How stupid are Americans? An entire nation who thought Muslims attacked
them on 911 when it was
none other than their own government who are all about to pay a
terrible price for being so blind, ignorant and gullible.
sollog warned the blood of americans will spill for Is ra el in ways
most can't even begin to imagine yet. i wonder if anyone in the US
fully understands what Radiation fallout will do not only to America,
but to the planet?
mankind better start looking at their survival guides real soon.
when you see the cities sollog named fall first to nuke terror, the
real fear on this planet will begin
nostradamus262 wrote:
me wrote:
It's clearly not BUSH!!!
Bush not anti GOD? LoL
the hell he's not... he certainly fits someone who is ANTI GOD or ANTI
CHRIST if being antichrist is against God. But then, there were many
Christs in hebrew lore. So one should analyze the word as MN used it.
Ante and Christos.
but bush, a member of skull and bones... lied to his people to create
the most evil war in the UNITED STATES HISTORY thats killed 100's of
thousands and was only done to position the US to attack IRAN soon,,,
and worst of all, part of the greatest conspiracy perhaps of all time
which killed 3000 of his own people on 911. CONTROLLED DEMOLITION OF
THE WTC.
its been shown howMabuscan easily connect to Bush using simple codes
in deciphering MN writings.
now as to ANTICHRIST being misunderstoood, lets see.... for one, most
have a retarded concept of the term to begin with if JC didn't exist as
the church has brainwashed its followers to believe for millenia.
I think fans of sollog explained back in 1996 here that ANTI CHRIST is
a term conceived/created solely by christians based on a
corrupt/retarded concept of God who they believe to be Jesus and Gods
son at the same time. Sure....
Now sollog has argued the New Testament was created to mock Gods Law in
the Old Testament since it was nothing more than a fairy tale and no
one named Jesus Christ ever existed. If one realizes that Jesus' last
testament was his claim to be the Morning Star in Revelations, then he
would have to be Lucifer since that is Satans AKA.
If this is true, then one primary meaning of Anti Christ would be
someone PRO GOD or ANTI JESUS CHRIST, not ANTI GOD since being ANTI
JESUS CHRIST would then be someone against or the opposite of Lucifer
if that was Jesus aka and was the real wolf in sheeps clothing.
Clever were the writers of the NT... nothing more than a work of
fiction thats Enslaved billions.
"I came to bring a sword of division"
and people wonder why xtians, muslims, and jews are full of such evil
and hate and can't stop fighting.
yeah, some prince of peace
Fools
The anti-Christ must be a Muslim, don't you think? Do you pay
attention to exactly what Bush is fighting? Do you see the war in
Darfur? In Somalia?
I'd say the people who blow themselves up are clearly NOT the good guys
of the world. Muslims want all the oil and all the earth...and Iran
wants to govern it.
I myself will read this when I catch up with all my new books. As far
as I can tell, the anti-Christ is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Pres. of
Iran. He denies the Holocaust ever happened yet wants to wipe Israel
off the map. He's constantly threatening Europe and the US, and he's
defiantly building nuclear weapons, with Russia's assistance.
Now I could be wrong, but it sure as hell isn't Bush.
me
mike3 wrote:
Hi.
I haven't read it but has anyone here done so? I'm curious as to who it
claims is the "AntiChrist". Is it BUSH????- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Hey Mr Sollog, consider this and give some intelligent arguement, if
you can.
OK, so 9/11 was one great big plan from the US gov't. They found some
nutty Muslims to hijack planes and kill themselves, and also rigged
the 3 WTC buildings with bombs so they'd collapse. This is your
theory so far, right? Well how is it that they "forgot" to plan for a
crash into the 3rd building? One great big plan, and OOPS, forgot a
plane!!
Also consider, how did the US gov't convince these Muslims to kill
themselves? Maybe a big bribe for their wives and/or mosques?
Also consider, the endless war between Republicans and Democrats. If
one party, the Republicans, were to blame for this grand
orchestration, then the Democrats would be howling these same claims
that you are. Yet just before the 9/11 Commission, Clinton's Sandy
Berger steals documents from the National Archive. He did this to
protect himself and Clinton, certainly not to protect Bush.
So, Mr whacko Sollog, how do you dispute or support any of this?
Where are your "facts"?
Maybe you should write a book explaining it all, since you are sooooo
well informed.
me
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: "The Nostradamus Code" |
22 Mar 2007 04:51:03 PM |
|
|
On Mar 21, 9:00 am, "me" <dgod...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Jan 26, 4:58 am, "nostradamus262" <matrixofma...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 12 Jan, 03:17, "me" <dgod...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Drink some more Kool-Aid, you just aren't crazy enough to be
institutionalized yet. Do the right thing and get crazier.
Controlled demolition of the WTC? Oh, I get it, the 'bombs' that were
at the bases of the WTC that 'really' caused it to fall. Hmmm, such an
elaborate plan, a great illusion, and the planes were not full of
Americans but maybe remote controlled????? Haha, yea.
The number dead
on 9/11, why don't you break it down instead of thowing numbers around?
How many were on the planes? Oh yea, and the controlled demolition,
such great Kool-Aid fantasy! If there were bombs, then why use planes?
Explain please.....
Oh look, another braindead robot programmed by fox news and the repubs.
Truly sad.
and YES, i said CONTROLLED DEMOLITION YOU FUCKING PUTZ... but let me
guess, you're one of those ignorant fuks who also thinks only 2 towers
fell on 911. However the real tragedy of it all is how BLATANT and
OBVIOUS the deed was.
Even with all the FACTS being so easy to verify, the truth of what
happened is so shocking, MOST people are so weak minded, they either
can't see whats right in front of them or are just too
scared to accept the horror of it.
That along with the media's failure to fully reveal these simple facts
since they're controlled by the same faction of the US government that
was behind the conspiracy.
I could go on down the list of FACT AFTER FACT aside from just simply
watching the 3 towers fall as they did, but like most, you're obviously
too braindead to even do a simple investigation and too stupid to
understand what a fact is.
in fact me stating this isn't even intended to convince morons like you
who don't know what
a fact is to begin with. its an opportunity to wake a few up out there
in MN land about something most are just now beginning to fully
understand and wake up to due to the new alternative media blitz
emerging.
When this truth finally becomes too powerful to hide by the mainstream,
and it will,,, an uprising by american citizens in a civil war will
begin in the United States if its not destroyed first in a war thats
about to begin with IRAN.
If someone with a brain truly wants to debate this intelligently and
objectively or discuss this indepth and SEE thousands of pages of FACTS
proving this truth beyond a shadow of a doubt, i welcome any serious or
private conversations, queries and emails since most likely those with
a serious interest in the truth probably hate debating with ignorant
fuks like yourself around stalking such intellectual news groups.
Since you can't use your brain, nor can tell the difference between
propaganda and news, what use will you ever be? Just keep sipping the
Kool-Aid>
seems you and most americans have actually been the ones sippin the
real poisoned mix of kool aid poured out by the mainstream media under
zionist control.
theres a difference between NEWS and FACTS you MORON
funny how you put PROPOGANDA AND NEWS in the same category as if one is
a credible source for truth.
what a dumbfuK
hope you and the rest of america are ready for the hell sollog warned
of hitting US cities soon for being too stupid to see the WAR ON TERROR
was nothing more than a LIE created to protect Israel and for control
of Oil and Power.
9/11, a date warned ONLY by sollog and fans before it occurred; Both
Literally and through MN style writings.
and an event that ma BUS used as a basis for the WAR ON TERROR.
for those with some brains left, just remember, Tower 7 is the KEY to
the beginning of understanding the EVIL and TRUTH behind 9/11.
How stupid are Americans? An entire nation who thought Muslims attacked
them on 911 when it was
none other than their own government who are all about to pay a
terrible price for being so blind, ignorant and gullible.
sollog warned the blood of americans will spill for Is ra el in ways
most can't even begin to imagine yet. i wonder if anyone in the US
fully understands what Radiation fallout will do not only to America,
but to the planet?
mankind better start looking at their survival guides real soon.
when you see the cities sollog named fall first to nuke terror, the
real fear on this planet will begin
nostradamus262 wrote:
me wrote:
It's clearly not BUSH!!!
Bush not anti GOD? LoL
the hell he's not... he certainly fits someone who is ANTI GOD or ANTI
CHRIST if being antichrist is against God. But then, there were many
Christs in hebrew lore. So one should analyze the word as MN used it.
Ante and Christos.
but bush, a member of skull and bones... lied to his people to create
the most evil war in the UNITED STATES HISTORY thats killed 100's of
thousands and was only done to position the US to attack IRAN soon,,,
and worst of all, part of the greatest conspiracy perhaps of all time
which killed 3000 of his own people on 911. CONTROLLED DEMOLITION OF
THE WTC.
its been shown howMabuscan easily connect to Bush using simple codes
in deciphering MN writings.
now as to ANTICHRIST being misunderstoood, lets see.... for one, most
have a retarded concept of the term to begin with if JC didn't exist as
the church has brainwashed its followers to believe for millenia.
I think fans of sollog explained back in 1996 here that ANTI CHRIST is
a term conceived/created solely by christians based on a
corrupt/retarded concept of God who they believe to be Jesus and Gods
son at the same time. Sure....
Now sollog has argued the New Testament was created to mock Gods Law in
the Old Testament since it was nothing more than a fairy tale and no
one named Jesus Christ ever existed. If one realizes that Jesus' last
testament was his claim to be the Morning Star in Revelations, then he
would have to be Lucifer since that is Satans AKA.
If this is true, then one primary meaning of Anti Christ would be
someone PRO GOD or ANTI JESUS CHRIST, not ANTI GOD since being ANTI
JESUS CHRIST would then be someone against or the opposite of Lucifer
if that was Jesus aka and was the real wolf in sheeps clothing.
Clever were the writers of the NT... nothing more than a work of
fiction thats Enslaved billions.
"I came to bring a sword of division"
and people wonder why xtians, muslims, and jews are full of such evil
and hate and can't stop fighting.
yeah, some prince of peace
Fools
The anti-Christ must be a Muslim, don't you think? Do you pay
attention to exactly what Bush is fighting? Do you see the war in
Darfur? In Somalia?
I'd say the people who blow themselves up are clearly NOT the good guys
of the world. Muslims want all the oil and all the earth...and Iran
wants to govern it.
I myself will read this when I catch up with all my new books. As far
as I can tell, the anti-Christ is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Pres. of
Iran. He denies the Holocaust ever happened yet wants to wipe Israel
off the map. He's constantly threatening Europe and the US, and he's
defiantly building nuclear weapons, with Russia's assistance.
Now I could be wrong, but it sure as hell isn't Bush.
me
mike3 wrote:
Hi.
I haven't read it but has anyone here done so? I'm curious as to who it
claims is the "AntiChrist". Is it BUSH????- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Hey Mr Sollog, consider this and give some intelligent arguement, if
you can.
OK, so 9/11 was one great big plan from the US gov't. They found some
nutty Muslims to hijack planes and kill themselves, and also rigged
the 3 WTC buildings with bombs so they'd collapse. This is your
theory so far, right? Well how is it that they "forgot" to plan for a
crash into the 3rd building? One great big plan, and OOPS, forgot a
plane!!
Also consider, how did the US gov't convince these Muslims to kill
themselves? Maybe a big bribe for their wives and/or mosques?
Also consider, the endless war between Republicans and Democrats. If
one party, the Republicans, were to blame for this grand
orchestration, then the Democrats would be howling these same claims
that you are. Yet just before the 9/11 Commission, Clinton's Sandy
Berger steals documents from the National Archive. He did this to
protect himself and Clinton, certainly not to protect Bush.
So, Mr whacko Sollog, how do you dispute or support any of this?
Where are your "facts"?
Maybe you should write a book explaining it all, since you are sooooo
well informed.
me
Do not give him oxygen, he never is rational and his views are really
screwed.
LB
.
|
|
|
| User: "JayJBee" |
|
| Title: Re: "The Nostradamus Code" |
24 Mar 2007 10:36:47 PM |
|
|
wrote:
On Mar 21, 9:00 am, "me" <dgod...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Jan 26, 4:58 am, "nostradamus262" <matrixofma...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 12 Jan, 03:17, "me" <dgod...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Drink some more Kool-Aid, you just aren't crazy enough to be
institutionalized yet. Do the right thing and get crazier.
Controlled demolition of the WTC? Oh, I get it, the 'bombs' that were
at the bases of the WTC that 'really' caused it to fall. Hmmm, such an
elaborate plan, a great illusion, and the planes were not full of
Americans but maybe remote controlled????? Haha, yea.
The number dead
on 9/11, why don't you break it down instead of thowing numbers around?
How many were on the planes? Oh yea, and the controlled demolition,
such great Kool-Aid fantasy! If there were bombs, then why use planes?
Explain please.....
Oh look, another braindead robot programmed by fox news and the repubs.
Truly sad.
and YES, i said CONTROLLED DEMOLITION YOU FUCKING PUTZ... but let me
guess, you're one of those ignorant fuks who also thinks only 2 towers
fell on 911. However the real tragedy of it all is how BLATANT and
OBVIOUS the deed was.
Even with all the FACTS being so easy to verify, the truth of what
happened is so shocking, MOST people are so weak minded, they either
can't see whats right in front of them or are just too
scared to accept the horror of it.
That along with the media's failure to fully reveal these simple facts
since they're controlled by the same faction of the US government that
was behind the conspiracy.
I could go on down the list of FACT AFTER FACT aside from just simply
watching the 3 towers fall as they did, but like most, you're obviously
too braindead to even do a simple investigation and too stupid to
understand what a fact is.
in fact me stating this isn't even intended to convince morons like you
who don't know what
a fact is to begin with. its an opportunity to wake a few up out there
in MN land about something most are just now beginning to fully
understand and wake up to due to the new alternative media blitz
emerging.
When this truth finally becomes too powerful to hide by the mainstream,
and it will,,, an uprising by american citizens in a civil war will
begin in the United States if its not destroyed first in a war thats
about to begin with IRAN.
If someone with a brain truly wants to debate this intelligently and
objectively or discuss this indepth and SEE thousands of pages of FACTS
proving this truth beyond a shadow of a doubt, i welcome any serious or
private conversations, queries and emails since most likely those with
a serious interest in the truth probably hate debating with ignorant
fuks like yourself around stalking such intellectual news groups.
Since you can't use your brain, nor can tell the difference between
propaganda and news, what use will you ever be? Just keep sipping the
Kool-Aid>
seems you and most americans have actually been the ones sippin the
real poisoned mix of kool aid poured out by the mainstream media under
zionist control.
theres a difference between NEWS and FACTS you MORON
funny how you put PROPOGANDA AND NEWS in the same category as if one is
a credible source for truth.
what a dumbfuK
hope you and the rest of america are ready for the hell sollog warned
of hitting US cities soon for being too stupid to see the WAR ON TERROR
was nothing more than a LIE created to protect Israel and for control
of Oil and Power.
9/11, a date warned ONLY by sollog and fans before it occurred; Both
Literally and through MN style writings.
and an event that ma BUS used as a basis for the WAR ON TERROR.
for those with some brains left, just remember, Tower 7 is the KEY to
the beginning of understanding the EVIL and TRUTH behind 9/11.
How stupid are Americans? An entire nation who thought Muslims attacked
them on 911 when it was
none other than their own government who are all about to pay a
terrible price for being so blind, ignorant and gullible.
sollog warned the blood of americans will spill for Is ra el in ways
most can't even begin to imagine yet. i wonder if anyone in the US
fully understands what Radiation fallout will do not only to America,
but to the planet?
mankind better start looking at their survival guides real soon.
when you see the cities sollog named fall first to nuke terror, the
real fear on this planet will begin
nostradamus262 wrote:
me wrote:
It's clearly not BUSH!!!
Bush not anti GOD? LoL
the hell he's not... he certainly fits someone who is ANTI GOD or ANTI
CHRIST if being antichrist is against God. But then, there were many
Christs in hebrew lore. So one should analyze the word as MN used it.
Ante and Christos.
but bush, a member of skull and bones... lied to his people to create
the most evil war in the UNITED STATES HISTORY thats killed 100's of
thousands and was only done to position the US to attack IRAN soon,,,
and worst of all, part of the greatest conspiracy perhaps of all time
which killed 3000 of his own people on 911. CONTROLLED DEMOLITION OF
THE WTC.
its been shown howMabuscan easily connect to Bush using simple codes
in deciphering MN writings.
now as to ANTICHRIST being misunderstoood, lets see.... for one, most
have a retarded concept of the term to begin with if JC didn't exist as
the church has brainwashed its followers to believe for millenia.
I think fans of sollog explained back in 1996 here that ANTI CHRIST is
a term conceived/created solely by christians based on a
corrupt/retarded concept of God who they believe to be Jesus and Gods
son at the same time. Sure....
Now sollog has argued the New Testament was created to mock Gods Law in
the Old Testament since it was nothing more than a fairy tale and no
one named Jesus Christ ever existed. If one realizes that Jesus' last
testament was his claim to be the Morning Star in Revelations, then he
would have to be Lucifer since that is Satans AKA.
If this is true, then one primary meaning of Anti Christ would be
someone PRO GOD or ANTI JESUS CHRIST, not ANTI GOD since being ANTI
JESUS CHRIST would then be someone against or the opposite of Lucifer
if that was Jesus aka and was the real wolf in sheeps clothing.
Clever were the writers of the NT... nothing more than a work of
fiction thats Enslaved billions.
"I came to bring a sword of division"
and people wonder why xtians, muslims, and jews are full of such evil
and hate and can't stop fighting.
yeah, some prince of peace
Fools
The anti-Christ must be a Muslim, don't you think? Do you pay
attention to exactly what Bush is fighting? Do you see the war in
Darfur? In Somalia?
I'd say the people who blow themselves up are clearly NOT the good guys
of the world. Muslims want all the oil and all the earth...and Iran
wants to govern it.
I myself will read this when I catch up with all my new books. As far
as I can tell, the anti-Christ is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Pres. of
Iran. He denies the Holocaust ever happened yet wants to wipe Israel
off the map. He's constantly threatening Europe and the US, and he's
defiantly building nuclear weapons, with Russia's assistance.
Now I could be wrong, but it sure as hell isn't Bush.
me
mike3 wrote:
Hi.
I haven't read it but has anyone here done so? I'm curious as to who it
claims is the "AntiChrist". Is it BUSH????- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Hey Mr Sollog, consider this and give some intelligent arguement, if
you can.
OK, so 9/11 was one great big plan from the US gov't. They found some
nutty Muslims to hijack planes and kill themselves, and also rigged
the 3 WTC buildings with bombs so they'd collapse. This is your
theory so far, right? Well how is it that they "forgot" to plan for a
crash into the 3rd building? One great big plan, and OOPS, forgot a
plane!!
Someone forgot to stay in his emergency bunker... didn't he?!?
You know... that emergency bunker next to CIA and FBI offices... and oh
yeah... ENRON investigating offices/projects that stored most of the
investigation's files in WTC7...
Why not answer ALL the questions hey?!
(Now you barried (ahum) that solog *****... what are you going to do
with your fear of looking away from fairy tales told true your (fox) box')
Also consider, how did the US gov't convince these Muslims to kill
themselves? Maybe a big bribe for their wives and/or mosques?
Also consider, the endless war between Republicans and Democrats. If
one party, the Republicans, were to blame for this grand
orchestration, then the Democrats would be howling these same claims
that you are. Yet just before the 9/11 Commission, Clinton's Sandy
Berger steals documents from the National Archive. He did this to
protect himself and Clinton, certainly not to protect Bush.
GWB 'It's so secret, I can't even talk about it'
AG 'I wish there was something I could tell you about that'
So, Mr whacko Sollog, how do you dispute or support any of this?
Where are your "facts"?
Out there.
Maybe you should write a book explaining it all, since you are sooooo
well informed.
Maybe you should consider 'peck and fethers'... parrot
me
Do not give him oxygen, he never is rational and his views are really
screwed.
LB
JayJBee
"Here's the other foxy bird"
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "me" |
|
| Title: Re: "The Nostradamus Code" |
16 Mar 2007 04:56:38 PM |
|
|
On Jan 26, 4:58 am, "nostradamus262" <matrixofma...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 12 Jan, 03:17, "me" <dgod...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Drink some more Kool-Aid, you just aren't crazy enough to be
institutionalized yet. Do the right thing and get crazier.
Controlled demolition of the WTC? Oh, I get it, the 'bombs' that were
at the bases of the WTC that 'really' caused it to fall. Hmmm, such an
elaborate plan, a great illusion, and the planes were not full of
Americans but maybe remote controlled????? Haha, yea.
The number dead
on 9/11, why don't you break it down instead of thowing numbers around?
How many were on the planes? Oh yea, and the controlled demolition,
such great Kool-Aid fantasy! If there were bombs, then why use planes?
Explain please.....
Oh look, another braindead robot programmed by fox news and the repubs.
Truly sad.
and YES, i said CONTROLLED DEMOLITION YOU FUCKING PUTZ... but let me
guess, you're one of those ignorant fuks who also thinks only 2 towers
fell on 911. However the real tragedy of it all is how BLATANT and
OBVIOUS the deed was.
Even with all the FACTS being so easy to verify, the truth of what
happened is so shocking, MOST people are so weak minded, they either
can't see whats right in front of them or are just too
scared to accept the horror of it.
That along with the media's failure to fully reveal these simple facts
since they're controlled by the same faction of the US government that
was behind the conspiracy.
I could go on down the list of FACT AFTER FACT aside from just simply
watching the 3 towers fall as they did, but like most, you're obviously
too braindead to even do a simple investigation and too stupid to
understand what a fact is.
in fact me stating this isn't even intended to convince morons like you
who don't know what
a fact is to begin with. its an opportunity to wake a few up out there
in MN land about something most are just now beginning to fully
understand and wake up to due to the new alternative media blitz
emerging.
When this truth finally becomes too powerful to hide by the mainstream,
and it will,,, an uprising by american citizens in a civil war will
begin in the United States if its not destroyed first in a war thats
about to begin with IRAN.
If someone with a brain truly wants to debate this intelligently and
objectively or discuss this indepth and SEE thousands of pages of FACTS
proving this truth beyond a shadow of a doubt, i welcome any serious or
private conversations, queries and emails since most likely those with
a serious interest in the truth probably hate debating with ignorant
fuks like yourself around stalking such intellectual news groups.
Since you can't use your brain, nor can tell the difference between
propaganda and news, what use will you ever be? Just keep sipping the
Kool-Aid>
seems you and most americans have actually been the ones sippin the
real poisoned mix of kool aid poured out by the mainstream media under
zionist control.
theres a difference between NEWS and FACTS you MORON
funny how you put PROPOGANDA AND NEWS in the same category as if one is
a credible source for truth.
what a dumbfuK
hope you and the rest of america are ready for the hell sollog warned
of hitting US cities soon for being too stupid to see the WAR ON TERROR
was nothing more than a LIE created to protect Israel and for control
of Oil and Power.
9/11, a date warned ONLY by sollog and fans before it occurred; Both
Literally and through MN style writings.
and an event that ma BUS used as a basis for the WAR ON TERROR.
for those with some brains left, just remember, Tower 7 is the KEY to
the beginning of understanding the EVIL and TRUTH behind 9/11.
How stupid are Americans? An entire nation who thought Muslims attacked
them on 911 when it was
none other than their own government who are all about to pay a
terrible price for being so blind, ignorant and gullible.
sollog warned the blood of americans will spill for Is ra el in ways
most can't even begin to imagine yet. i wonder if anyone in the US
fully understands what Radiation fallout will do not only to America,
but to the planet?
mankind better start looking at their survival guides real soon.
when you see the cities sollog named fall first to nuke terror, the
real fear on this planet will begin
nostradamus262 wrote:
me wrote:
It's clearly not BUSH!!!
Bush not anti GOD? LoL
the hell he's not... he certainly fits someone who is ANTI GOD or ANTI
CHRIST if being antichrist is against God. But then, there were many
Christs in hebrew lore. So one should analyze the word as MN used it.
Ante and Christos.
but bush, a member of skull and bones... lied to his people to create
the most evil war in the UNITED STATES HISTORY thats killed 100's of
thousands and was only done to position the US to attack IRAN soon,,,
and worst of all, part of the greatest conspiracy perhaps of all time
which killed 3000 of his own people on 911. CONTROLLED DEMOLITION OF
THE WTC.
its been shown howMabuscan easily connect to Bush using simple codes
in deciphering MN writings.
now as to ANTICHRIST being misunderstoood, lets see.... for one, most
have a retarded concept of the term to begin with if JC didn't exist as
the church has brainwashed its followers to believe for millenia.
I think fans of sollog explained back in 1996 here that ANTI CHRIST is
a term conceived/created solely by christians based on a
corrupt/retarded concept of God who they believe to be Jesus and Gods
son at the same time. Sure....
Now sollog has argued the New Testament was created to mock Gods Law in
the Old Testament since it was nothing more than a fairy tale and no
one named Jesus Christ ever existed. If one realizes that Jesus' last
testament was his claim to be the Morning Star in Revelations, then he
would have to be Lucifer since that is Satans AKA.
If this is true, then one primary meaning of Anti Christ would be
someone PRO GOD or ANTI JESUS CHRIST, not ANTI GOD since being ANTI
JESUS CHRIST would then be someone against or the opposite of Lucifer
if that was Jesus aka and was the real wolf in sheeps clothing.
Clever were the writers of the NT... nothing more than a work of
fiction thats Enslaved billions.
"I came to bring a sword of division"
and people wonder why xtians, muslims, and jews are full of such evil
and hate and can't stop fighting.
yeah, some prince of peace
Fools
The anti-Christ must be a Muslim, don't you think? Do you pay
attention to exactly what Bush is fighting? Do you see the war in
Darfur? In Somalia?
I'd say the people who blow themselves up are clearly NOT the good guys
of the world. Muslims want all the oil and all the earth...and Iran
wants to govern it.
I myself will read this when I catch up with all my new books. As far
as I can tell, the anti-Christ is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Pres. of
Iran. He denies the Holocaust ever happened yet wants to wipe Israel
off the map. He's constantly threatening Europe and the US, and he's
defiantly building nuclear weapons, with Russia's assistance.
Now I could be wrong, but it sure as hell isn't Bush.
me
mike3 wrote:
Hi.
I haven't read it but has anyone here done so? I'm curious as to who it
claims is the "AntiChrist". Is it BUSH????- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Who the ***** is sollog? Is he the voice in your head? Or maybe your
demon lord? Only talks to you when your ***** won't get hard?
Tower 7 is the key, eh? Well, I do remember tower 7 falling, and no
plane hit it. I assume it fell either from fallout from the main 2
towers, or was so damaged from the fallout, that it was a controlled
drop.
So, there were no Muslims who hijacked the planes? Then who did
hijack those planes? Oh, I know, the pilots were in on it too. Or
maybe the media superimposed airplanes and smoke and fire on the
buildings, and even those people who jumped to their deaths because
the heat was too much to take. Yea, all a broad brush stroke
illusion. Yea, the Zionist media and the US gov't conducted this
grand hoax; surely Hollywood special effects are involved too.
You are truly a heartless ***** to believe that the US did it to
itself. I guess there are no "bad guys" anywhere in the world, but
only in Washington.
Dude, if we wanted to be the evil nation you believe we are, we could
just go to war without staging some ***** like this. Looney's like you
should try and help the evil US think of the next illusion to create.
Yea, I'm ready to hear some intelligent debate. Love to hear some of
your "facts". If sollog says it's ok, that is...
me
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "nostradamus262" |
|
| Title: Re: "The Nostradamus Code" |
06 Jan 2007 10:35:15 AM |
|
|
correction
nostradamus262 wrote:
If this is true, then one primary meaning of Anti Christ would be
someone PRO GOD or ANTI JESUS CHRIST, not ANTI GOD since being ANTI
JESUS CHRIST would then be someone against or the opposite of Lucifer
if that was Jesus aka and was the real wolf in sheeps clothing.
to clarify, that should have read
If this is true, then one primary meaning of Anti Christ would be
someone ---against--- JESUS CHRIST, not against GOD since being
ANTICHRIST is ANTI JESUSCHRIST / Lucifer if JC was the real wolf in
sheeps clothing.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: "The Nostradamus Code" |
12 Jan 2007 03:03:42 PM |
|
|
nostradamus262 wrote:
me wrote:
It's clearly not BUSH!!!
Bush not anti GOD? LoL
the hell he's not... he certainly fits someone who is ANTI GOD or ANTI
CHRIST if being antichrist is against God. But then, there were many
Christs in hebrew lore. So one should analyze the word as MN used it.
Ante and Christos.
but bush, a member of skull and bones... lied to his people to create
the most evil war in the UNITED STATES HISTORY thats killed 100's of
thousands and was only done to position the US to attack IRAN soon,,,
and worst of all, part of the greatest conspiracy perhaps of all time
which killed 3000 of his own people on 911. CONTROLLED DEMOLITION OF
THE WTC.
its been shown how Mabus can easily connect to Bush using simple codes
in deciphering MN writings.
now as to ANTICHRIST being misunderstoood, lets see.... for one, most
have a retarded concept of the term to begin with if JC didn't exist as
the church has brainwashed its followers to believe for millenia.
I think fans of sollog explained back in 1996 here that ANTI CHRIST is
a term conceived/created solely by christians based on a
corrupt/retarded concept of God who they believe to be Jesus and Gods
son at the same time. Sure....
Now sollog has argued the New Testament was created to mock Gods Law in
the Old Testament since it was nothing more than a fairy tale and no
one named Jesus Christ ever existed. If one realizes that Jesus' last
testament was his claim to be the Morning Star in Revelations, then he
would have to be Lucifer since that is Satans AKA.
If this is true, then one primary meaning of Anti Christ would be
someone PRO GOD or ANTI JESUS CHRIST, not ANTI GOD since being ANTI
JESUS CHRIST would then be someone against or the opposite of Lucifer
if that was Jesus aka and was the real wolf in sheeps clothing.
Clever were the writers of the NT... nothing more than a work of
fiction thats Enslaved billions.
"I came to bring a sword of division"
and people wonder why xtians, muslims, and jews are full of such evil
and hate and can't stop fighting.
yeah, some prince of peace
Fools
The anti-Christ must be a Muslim, don't you think? Do you pay
attention to exactly what Bush is fighting? Do you see the war in
Darfur? In Somalia?
I'd say the people who blow themselves up are clearly NOT the good guys
of the world. Muslims want all the oil and all the earth...and Iran
wants to govern it.
I myself will read this when I catch up with all my new books. As far
as I can tell, the anti-Christ is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Pres. of
Iran. He denies the Holocaust ever happened yet wants to wipe Israel
off the map. He's constantly threatening Europe and the US, and he's
defiantly building nuclear weapons, with Russia's assistance.
Now I could be wrong, but it sure as hell isn't Bush.
me
mike3 wrote:
Hi.
I haven't read it but has anyone here done so? I'm curious as to who =
it
claims is the "AntiChrist". Is it BUSH????
Here we go again taking the Schoolboys down their erroneous path to
show them they are spreading a big misconception!
"its been shown how Mabus can easily connect to Bush using simple codes
in deciphering MN writings.
Something he clearly does not understand, pearls before swine?
Watch this lot be rejected because, it just does not fit our schollies
POV and it is just too Intellectual to debunk cogently.
Until the 19th century, a proper understanding of the prophecies, of
Nostradamus required an enormous amount of learning including mastery
of Latin, Creek, Old French, classical and medieval geography an (1
some Provencal. In short, the reader was required to have the same
knowl-edge that Nostradamus had.
But in the last hundred years such vast strides have been taken in the
cataloguing of human knowledge in convenient reference books that there
now remains very little in the text of the prophecies that has not been
clarified, or cannot be clarified. When Le Pelletier wrote his edition
during the Second Empire, he already had many tools to work with in
compiling his Nostradamian glossary. Today we have many more.
Nostradamus states in several places in his Preface arid Epistle that
he had deliberately obscured his prophecies and veiled them as heavily
possible. Why He did so is no mystery at all, and any reasonable person
think of many reasons: to avoid offense to the authorities of Church
and State, which might have involved his own summary liquidation; to
avoid the inconceivably wicked, not to mention confusing, sacrilege of
threatening to interfere with the fulfillment of God's Will by
disclosing it clearly in ad-vance; and perhaps also because of every
prophet's quite human desire to reduce the number of his failures to a
minimum by use of mysterious and confusing terminology. The important
question is then not why but Nostradamus goes about this These seem to
be the principal answers:
1=2E The innumerable glaring examples of Latin syntax seem to offer
satisfactory substantiation for the theory that the quatrains were
first written in Latin, perhaps from a rough draft in French. What kind
of Latin? We find an example in one quatrain that was left in Latin,
the "Incantion Against Inept Critics," found at the end of Century VI.
Some commentator's call it liturgical Latin, others just Low Latin.
jean Leroux in his Clef' (1712) came forth with something much more
specific. He was convinced that Nostradamus had read a book called
Progymnasmata in artem orator- ium by Franciscus Sylvius, professor at
the University of Paris. This book printed in 1528, set forth in the
greatest detail how to produce the most elegant Latin. Leroux cites
chapter and verse of Sylvius' book for ten instances in which his
precepts have been followed in this one quatrain alone. The French
translation of this "elegant" Latin is virtually verbatim. This means
that Latin syntax, not French syntax, prevails. It means, for instance.
that an ablative absolute construction loses its identity as such in
uninflected French, and yet requires the translation of an ablative
absolute,
By this theory it would seem that the proper sense of the quatrains
could best be derived by translating them back, verbatim, into Latin,
In his bilingual Janus in 1594, Chavigny did indeed give many of the
quatrains Latin, without, however, much more sense being made by them
by any -Perhaps Chavigny, excellent classics scholar that he was, did
not use proper Latin. Or perhaps the theory is worthy of but limited
applica-tion. In any, case, this theory must be kept in mind, even if
its application by no means makes the quatrains much clearer.
1=2E Although the quatrains are nominally translated into French about ,5
per cent of the words are not recognizable as French today. About 2.8
per cent of the vocabulary is merely frenchified Latin (with slight
changes in the endings) if not pure Latin. Another 2..1 per cent
Consists of 01(1 French words.' The remaining 0.1 per cent consists of
words of Greek or Provencal origin .
2 Le Pelletier mentions Spanish, Italian, Celtic and Hebrew as the
source of many words, but there is only one Hebrew word 1096), a
sentence in Spanish (1025), and nothing from the other two tongues that
could riot be derived as well or better from Latin or Old French.
Perhaps the biggest source of confusion is in connection with words
identical with French words, but which the context shows to have other
derivation. Thus the word pont means, "bridge" in French, but we find
Nostradamus using it to mean "sea," from the Greek pontos. or 'Papacy"
from the Latin pontifex (and derivatives). Although pie means "magpie"
French, Nostradamus used it as a derivative of the Latin pius,
"pious"
3=2E Anagrams were all the rage in Nostradamus' day, It is quite,
reasonable that he should have made use of them. Thus Chyren is put for
Henryc-us), Nersaf for "France," Rapis for "Paris," noir for roy,
"king," and (Mendosus for "Vendosme" (the actual Bourbon sub-branch
that came to the throne). In the anagrams latitude is provided by the
inter changeability, of and i,u and v, s and c, i and j. The use of
silent s instead of a circumflex similar variations of form in
accentation must also be noted. Although the perfect anagram required
the use of the same letters, Nostradamus seems to have allowed himself
the change of one letter, but never more than one.
Similar to the use of anagrams is the rise of enigmas. Prominent
amongst these are Aenobarbe, which means Bronzebeard but is also the
family name the of Antichrist Nero, symbol of pagan wickedness, the
Pourceau Mi-homme, which means "pig-half-man"; and various gentlemen
named after Roman gods, like Jupiter, Mars and Saturn.
4=2E Mythological and historical allusions veil several quatrains. One
quatrain refers to the story of Bellerophon and Proetus, another to
that of Jupiter and Phaeton. In the Epistle someone is called a second
Thrasibulus, so we must know that this gentleman was the leader of the
popular party at Athens who restored the democracy in 403 B.C. and is
therefore the symbol of a radical demagogue. 'As Old French was still
much in use in it is riot quite correct to consider this amongst the
deliberate obscurifications of Nostrdamus. many words could be derived
from either Latin or French equally one whole quatrain in (426) and
most of another (444),
5=2E References to many places are veiled by use of their classical names
or origin. Thus we find Port Phocen for Marseilles. founded by the '
Phoceans; Byzantium for Constantinople or Istanbul; Agatha for Agen;
Lutetia for Paris; Bastarnia for Poland; Hister for the Danube;
Pannonia for Hungary; Lusitania for Portugal and many, many others.
6=2E Nostradamus makes ample use of devices variously considered as
grammatical, poetical or rhetorical, and derived chiefly from Latin or
Greek usage. Chief amongst these are-
a) ELLIPSIS, the omission of words which are understood. Thus qui is
used frequently for ce qui, "he who."
b) SYNECDOCHE, the part standing for the whole. Thus sword stands for
army at times, or Paris may stand for France. A common
non-Nostra-damiam
contemporary example is "the Kremlin for the U.S.S.R. How-ever, this
has been carried too far by some interpreters in twisting simple
statements into farfetched images.
c) HYPERBATON, the transposition or inversion of the natural order.
This is found throughout. The dividing line between it and the
previously men-tioned use of Latin syntax is rather blurry.
d) APOCOPE, the omission of the last letter or syllable. In
Nostradamus, this amounts to abbreviation. We find Carpen for
Carpentras, Ast for Asti, Carcas for Careassonne, etc.
e) SYNCOPE, the omission of a letter or syllable from the middle of a
word. Thus donra is used for donnera, lairra for laissera, monstra for
monstrera and Tamins for Tamisiens (those of the Thames).
f) APHERESIS, the omission of a letter or syllable from the beginning
of a word. Thus, vers=E9 is used for renvers=E9, "overthrown."
g) EPENTHESIS, the insertion of a letter or syllable in the middle.
Thus we find Timbre for Tibre, the Tiber River.
h) PROSTHESIS, the insertion of an extra letter at the beginning of a
word. Thus, Aspire is put for Spire, a city in Bavaria.
i) METATHESIS, the transposition of letters or syllables. Thus Ucetia
is used for Uticensia, Latin name for the town of Uzes.
Now if one shoves some sort of tube up their snozzes and goes to the
mirror they must just use the rest of the brain getting off on whatever
gloo they are taking.
LB
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: "The Nostradamus Code" |
05 Jan 2007 04:24:46 PM |
|
|
mike3 wrote:
Hi.
I haven't read it but has anyone here done so? I'm curious as to who it
claims is the "AntiChrist". Is it BUSH????
Maybe you should start by actually reading what Nostradamus wrote.
The idea Nostradamus mirrors the Bible vis a vis matters prophetic is
quite simply misguided.
But show us what you got.
LB
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cardinal Chunder" |
|
| Title: Re: "The Nostradamus Code" |
05 Jan 2007 06:27:36 AM |
|
|
mike3 wrote:
Hi.
I haven't read it but has anyone here done so? I'm curious as to who it
claims is the "AntiChrist". Is it BUSH????
The antichrist changes all the time. Kooks love to project one
contemporary political figure or another to be the antichrist.
Eventually that figure dies or leaves office and the kooks move onto
another one. Same ***** happens with Mabus.
--
"Hello. I'm Leonard Nimoy. The following tale of alien encounters is
true. And by true, I mean false. It's all lies. But they're entertaining
lies. And in the end, isn't that the real truth? The answer is: No."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: "The Nostradamus Code" |
04 Jan 2007 07:45:44 PM |
|
|
mike3 wrote:
Hi.
I haven't read it but has anyone here done so? I'm curious as to who it
claims is the "AntiChrist". Is it BUSH????
Why do people believe so much in an 'anti-Christ'?
To do so means that you accept a part of that dusty old fable,'The
Bible' contains accurate information.
To believe in 'Devils' means you mut also believe in a God (s)
This nonsense about an 'anti-Christ' is as silly as believing that he
world is supported on the back of a giant turtle.
I fancy it is popular simply because the adherent wants to believe...a
little like the popular noion of passing spacemen and time travellers
wandering around.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Docrodile" |
|
| Title: Re: "The Nostradamus Code" |
04 Jan 2007 11:39:12 PM |
|
|
"Werewolfy" <Werewolfy1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1167961543.978190.265140@s80g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
mike3 wrote:
Hi.
I haven't read it but has anyone here done so? I'm curious as to who it
claims is the "AntiChrist". Is it BUSH????
Why do people believe so much in an 'anti-Christ'?
To do so means that you accept a part of that dusty old fable,'The
Bible' contains accurate information.
To believe in 'Devils' means you mut also believe in a God (s)
This nonsense about an 'anti-Christ' is as silly as believing that he
world is supported on the back of a giant turtle.
I fancy it is popular simply because the adherent wants to believe...a
little like the popular noion of passing spacemen and time travellers
wandering around.
Werewolfy
As you know, Wolfy, there have been countless "antichrists" throughout
history -- defined strictly as those who have little or no respect for
the sanctity of human life and have been clever and deceptive. (The
definition runs beyond that into supernatural territory, of course, with
many religious folks.) There's always one or two or more around somewhere.
I don't expect that the ones we have right now in the world are any
different than the ones before.
Pol Pot of Cambodia, to name just one example, exhibited the usual extreme
bad-guy characteristics as an antichrist-like leader, lying and covering,
while slaughtering about 1 million for years as the world stood by and
denounced his actions. BTW, Ford was urged to take action against Pol Pot
but since his regime seemed to not threaten US interests, or appeared to
not expand his activities beyond his borderlines, Ford did nothing. It was
one of the only times I thought Jerry did the right thing. Too bad Bush
couldn't have learned something from a guy he gave such a glowing eulogy
for.
The infamous Big Daddy Antichrist the Bible mentions seems to be about a
man and a system he controls, and is a particularly powerful antichrist,
supposedly more than any other that's come before him (Lil' Daddy
Antichrists?). The Devil will one day infuse him with supernatural powers,
so they believe. As you say, that notion involves belief in a Devil. I
think man's subconscious is where Evil and Good reside, exclusively, and
without outside influence of supernatural entities (if they exist). But,
why conjure up a supernatural being to influence our minds, when it's
perfectly sufficient to 'believe' we are the sole origin of evil? The end
result is the same, no matter which theory one subscribes to -- murder,
torture, sadism, oppression, repression, persecution, et al, have to be
experienced by this species, anyway.
Popularized in the media for so long, and outrageously dramatized in films
like The Omen and The Exorcist, I'd think the believers out there are
expecting a real wam-bang evildoer to come along. LOL! No doubt, they'll
have their man some day, or something they think is him...but I keep
wondering whether he'll live up to their expectations of supreme
supernatural evil, so commonly interpreted from ancient religious texts.
Docrodile
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: "The Nostradamus Code" |
05 Jan 2007 08:19:04 AM |
|
|
Docrodile wrote:
Popularized in the media for so long, and outrageously dramatized in films
like The Omen and The Exorcist, I'd think the believers out there are
expecting a real wam-bang evildoer to come along. LOL! No doubt, they'll
have their man some day, or something they think is him...but I keep
wondering whether he'll live up to their expectations of supreme
supernatural evil, so commonly interpreted from ancient religious texts.
Docrodile
A better interpretaton of the use of 'anti-Christ, Doc. Better by far.
I'll stand back from this discussion, having just read the quite
incredibly bad post (below) from 'me'.
'Me' isn't someone with a brain, that much is obvious. I'm afraid that
this new-comer is a bit like a quiet fly..just not worth swatting.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "me" |
|
| Title: Re: "The Nostradamus Code" |
04 Jan 2007 10:00:41 PM |
|
|
What's really silly is that the athiests cling to man's great feats and
creations as coming from monkeys, and that life just randomly,
chaoticly happened for no real reason.
Sounds like you have a fetish for riding turtles.
me
Werewolfy wrote:
mike3 wrote:
Hi.
I haven't read it but has anyone here done so? I'm curious as to who it
claims is the "AntiChrist". Is it BUSH????
Why do people believe so much in an 'anti-Christ'?
To do so means that you accept a part of that dusty old fable,'The
Bible' contains accurate information.
To believe in 'Devils' means you mut also believe in a God (s)
This nonsense about an 'anti-Christ' is as silly as believing that he
world is supported on the back of a giant turtle.
I fancy it is popular simply because the adherent wants to believe...a
little like the popular noion of passing spacemen and time travellers
wandering around.
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
| User: "Werewolfy" |
|
| Title: Re: "The Nostradamus Code" |
05 Jan 2007 08:12:57 AM |
|
|
me wrote:
Sounds like you have a fetish for riding turtles.
me
Haven't read too many books by Carl Sagan..have you?
Werewolfy
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
