THE NEW WORLD ORDER
By Aida Parker
IT is bad enough that the world is being pulverised into grinding
poverty. But there is a much bigger story here. First, let's look at
some relevant quotes:
*As Frederic Morton wrote in the preface to The Rothschilds "Someone
once said that the Wealth of the Rothschilds consists of the
bankruptcy of nations.
*In his The Empire of the City E C, Knuth wrote: "The fact that the
House of Rothschilds made its money in the great crashes of history
and the great wars of history, the very periods when others lost their
money, is beyond question.”
*US President Andrew Jackson, the only US President (1839/47) to
totally abolish the National Debt, condemned the international bankers
as "A den of vipers," one which he was determined to root out of
American life. Jackson claimed that if the American people only
understood how these "vipers" operate on the American scene, "there
would be a revolution before morning.
* Many years later President Woodrow Wilson made another revealing
statement. "Some of the biggest men in the US, in the fields of
commerce and manufacturing know that there is a power so organised, so
subtler so complete, so pernicious, that they had better not speak
above their breath in condemnation of it."
Wilson was of course referring to the elitists, the insiders, the
Globalists seeking a One World Order. For many years even talk of such
an Insider conspiracy was dismissed as laughable. Not many people are
laughing now. Right now we are seeing the truth of it all in Asia,
Russia and Latin America.
The Rothschilds, the Rockefellers and many others in the international
banking system and the big multinationals, the Insiders who support
the New World Order, have huge influence with the IMF and World Bank.
It is certainly no secret that the IMF, by deliberately and
persistently providing incredibly bad advice in all these distressed
areas, played a major role in precipitating the ongoing global
currency crisis.
Why this scheme to push these countries over the brink?
One prime reason: while these collapses have been catastrophic for the
nations and people involved. they have provided rich pickings for
Western banking and financial interests. That has become strikingly
apparent in Asia where the corporate vultures have swooped down,
buying everything in sight.
Hotel chains. great office blocks, manufacturing plants. mansions?
ocean liners, fishing fleets, art collections, golf courses; you name
it, they have gobbled it up, as well as buying out local partners in
existing joint ventures or increasing their stakes.
Big buyers and investment banks such as Bankers Trust, Goldman Sachs,
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter and Merrill Lynch. all have been buying up
Asian assets for as little as ten cents in the US$.
Indeed. for internationals with corporate connections to the
NWO-supporting New York-based Council on Foreign Relations or David
Rockefeller's Trilateral Commission, buying up bankrupt assets for
peanuts appears to be an important corollary to ruining national
economies. But there is another and, from the NWO aspect, conceivably
even more important aspect to all this.
The Asian problem started when the IMF advised the Thai Government
against getting banks to cut back on money creation, the source of the
problem in the first place: and, further, to sever its currency's ties
to the US.$. By no means complete financial fools, the Thais
protested. But when the IMF made it clear that these provisos were
conditional on Thailand receiving a bailout, the IMF got its way; and
the present crisis was born.
The same fatal prescription was forced on South Korea, Malaysia,
Indonesia and the Philippines. The major currency speculators then
moved in and the Asian economies, one after another, were broken by
widespread bankruptcies, severe recession and devastating inflation.
The game was on.
But, as The New American points out, critics who complain that IMF
practices lead to disaster are missing the point. From the Insiders'
point of view, the IMF is immensely successful in its mission, which
is to seize control of the economies of sovereign nations.
Martin Feldstein, a professor of economics at Harvard exposed this
mission in a remarkable article in The Wall Street Journal, 10.10.98.
He observed that the massive Asian bailout funds were not used to
prevent currency runs (as one might suppose) but were provided "only
if the countries accepted ... radical restructuring of their entire
domestic economies ... labour rules, corporate governance, tax systems
and other matters not germane to a financial crisis."
He then quoted IMF director Michel Camdessus as saying that if the IMF
had wanted to deal only with the liquidity and debt problems, it would
have succeeded but, “Happily, the Asian crisis gave the IMF the
leverage to force structural policy changes that national governments
would not otherwise accept.” (AP italics).
Feldstein wraps up by condemning the IMF. He points out that the Asian
economies were fundamentally sound and, with modest adjustments, could
easily have earned extra foreign exchange to repay foreign debts.
Instead, the IMF falsely criticised them as “incompetent and corrupt,”
thereby undermining the confidence of global leaders in emerging
markets generally, and so contributing to the contagion.
One wonders; why has no so-called “investigative journo” quizzed
Camdessus what the real objective of the IMF was, what special
“Insider” programme it was following? And what about “original
intent”?
Summing up. What we have and are seeing is Western banking
institutions looting developing countries’ central banks, plundering
foreign exchange reserves, undermining national governments and
destabilising entire national economies, promoting instability and
unrest throughout the world. Over the last two years, a massive
concentration of financial power has taken place in the hands of the
Insiders. Does this not make organised crime look like a Sunday
school?
And all of it, we may be very sure, as a means of finally installing a
global currency and the NWO. The New World Order is a reality. All
that is left for us is to understand that.
.
|
