-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
IT IS WITH much regret and sadness that I must report that
I'd sorely misplaced my trust in someone very near and dear
to me. This person had asked me for help and I was foolish
enough to give it to them. Fool me twice the shame's on me.
This person had asked me to comment on a book, actually two
books, that they had "written". God forgive me that I didn't
initially realize their ulterior anti-Christ Liberal motives,
their unscrupulousness, plagiarism, misquoting and unbridled
hatred of our LORD and Saviour Jesus Christ and His ekklesia.
Time will tell who and what two books I'm humbly alluding to.
My last error was openly and uninhibitedly discussing things
of the spirit on the record with them. Had I known what they
would do with it I'd've died with it closed up in my stomach.
Yes, Nostradamus was no fool. I now humbly bow to his wisdom.
I'd naively hoped that a dyed-in-the-wool, "60s" old-school
Liberal could see the light and rise above the primeval fray.
I thought wrong. Liberals, even of the "old-school" variety,
are hopelessly anti-Christ, anti-American and are eternally
damned to Perdition's unrelenting and unquenchable flames...
No exceptions. No exclusions.
(if only I'd listened to the now-extinct Hopi elders;
for them it's just too late. It's too Goddamned late)
This is reminiscent of the first American Civil War, when
it was commonplace, even for immediate family members, to
distance themselves, unhesitatingly fight, injure and kill
each other amidst the hellish and sanguinary conflagration.
In deed, the irreconcilable division between patriotic God-
fearing Judeo-Christian Republicans versus the anti-Christ
anti-American Liberals has reached its point of no return.
From this point forward I'll NEVER speak on any good terms
with a Liberal again. I've said it many times before, and
from this point forward I'll repeat it until my dying day:
The only good Liberal is...roasting in Hades.
Considering how the "model" Liberal Democrat Ward Churchill
has openly and repeatedly called for U.S. Military soldiers
to murder their superior officers on the field of combat, I,
Daniel Joseph Min, do with malice of forethought, from here
on out, openly advocate and condone all Republicans to obey
the laws of the land to the LETTER. I mean, don't even spit
on the sidewalk, or jaywalk, but always obey the Law to the
very letter thereof. Let's destroy the Liberals--by the law.
We own all three branches of our beloved Federal Government.
We needn't stoop down to the level of the Liberal barbarian.
Enjoy Life! (fillet a liberal for lunch)
Daniel Joseph Min
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B1CCFE7
*Download Min's Banned (Freeware) Books:
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
*Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=XJBDEJF138262.9022453704@anonymous.poster
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQ+lGepljD7YrHM/nEQKf+gCggqLgB6vlOlVYNnv7DGXdw4qgJ/sAmwaz
/bO2p4yU011iIT7VdQyTu+UR
=lAj+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
`
.
|
|
| User: "SBC Yahoo" |
|
| Title: Re: The Only Good Liberal `~ |
08 Feb 2006 04:00:00 PM |
|
|
Here are the definitions of some words that you use a lot, but obviously do
not have a good handle on their meaning. In the mean time, happy slamming
of liberals, (but notice that many of the things that "real liberal" is
supposed to stand for are the same things a republican stands for i.e.,
freedom, small government, property rights, etc. I think it is the LIBERALS
that do not know what a liberal is supposed to be, because most liberals
that I know do not fit the definition of Liberal. The main difference
between a modern day liberal and a conservative is the liberal wants the
government to control everything, and the conservative wants the government
to keep out of their business and life, as much as possible.
Definitions from Wikipedia
Agnosticism is the philosophical view that the truth or falsity of certain
claims-particularly theological claims regarding the existence of God or
gods-is unknown, unknowable, or incoherent. Some agnostics infer from this
that these claims are irrelevant to life. The term and the related agnostic
were coined by Thomas Henry Huxley in 1869, and are also used to describe
those who are unconvinced or noncommittal about the existence of deities as
well as other matters of religion. The word agnostic comes from the Greek a
(without) and gnosis (knowledge). Agnosticism, focusing on what can be
known, is an epistemological position (dealing with the nature and limits of
human knowledge); while atheism and theism are ontological positions (a
branch of metaphysics that deals with what types of entities exist).
Agnosticism is not to be confused with a view specifically opposing the
doctrine of gnosis and Gnosticism-these are religious concepts that are not
generally related to agnosticism.
Agnosticism is distinct from strong atheism (also called positive atheism or
dogmatic atheism), which denies the existence of any deities. However, the
more general variety of atheism, weak atheism (also called negative atheism,
and sometimes neutral atheism), professes only a lack of belief in a god or
gods, which is not equivalent to but is compatible with agnosticism.
Critical atheism admits that a god or gods are meaningful concepts but the
evidence for them is not in hand, so a default position of not believing in
them must be taken in the interim.
Agnostics may claim that it isn't possible to have absolute or certain
spiritual knowledge or, alternatively, that while certainty may be possible,
they personally have no such knowledge. In both cases, agnosticism involves
some form of skepticism towards religious statements. This is different from
the simple irreligion of those who give no thought to the subject.
Atheism, in its broadest sense, is an absence of belief in any deities. That
is, all who do not have such a belief - whether they are nontheists,
agnostics, or even Buddhists - are covered under this term. Atheism can also
be defined more narrowly as the active rejection of the existence of gods,
either of a specific or general kind, or even of the possibility that gods
can exist. Generally speaking, atheism refers to a lack of belief in all
deities for whatever reason.
Although atheists often share common concerns regarding empirical evidence
and the scientific method of investigation and a large number are skeptics,
there is no single ideology that all atheists share. Additionally, there are
atheists who are religious or spiritual, though many of these would not
describe themselves as atheists.
Atheism should not be confused with the related, but not equivalent,
position of anti-theism, as many atheists practice religious toleration
(which should not be confused with the principle of Freedom of religion).
Liberalism is an ideology, or current of political thought, which holds
liberty as the primary political value.[1] Liberalism seeks a society
characterized by freedom of thought for individuals, limitations on the
power of government and religion, the rule of law, the free exchange of
ideas, a free market economy that supports private enterprise, and a system
of government that is transparent. This form of government favors liberal
democracy with open and fair elections, where all citizens have equal rights
by law, and an equal opportunity to succeed. Liberalism rejected many
foundational assumptions which dominated most earlier theories of
government, such as the Divine Right of Kings, hereditary status, and
established religion. Fundamental human rights that all liberals support
include the right to life, liberty, and property. In many countries, modern
liberalism differs from classical liberalism by asserting that government
provision of some minimal level of material well-being takes priority over
individual rights.
"Daniel Joseph Min" <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in message
news:72YWA2R238755.8880902778@twistycreek.com...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
IT IS WITH much regret and sadness that I must report that
I'd sorely misplaced my trust in someone very near and dear
to me. This person had asked me for help and I was foolish
enough to give it to them. Fool me twice the shame's on me.
This person had asked me to comment on a book, actually two
books, that they had "written". God forgive me that I didn't
initially realize their ulterior anti-Christ Liberal motives,
their unscrupulousness, plagiarism, misquoting and unbridled
hatred of our LORD and Saviour Jesus Christ and His ekklesia.
Time will tell who and what two books I'm humbly alluding to.
My last error was openly and uninhibitedly discussing things
of the spirit on the record with them. Had I known what they
would do with it I'd've died with it closed up in my stomach.
Yes, Nostradamus was no fool. I now humbly bow to his wisdom.
I'd naively hoped that a dyed-in-the-wool, "60s" old-school
Liberal could see the light and rise above the primeval fray.
I thought wrong. Liberals, even of the "old-school" variety,
are hopelessly anti-Christ, anti-American and are eternally
damned to Perdition's unrelenting and unquenchable flames...
No exceptions. No exclusions.
(if only I'd listened to the now-extinct Hopi elders;
for them it's just too late. It's too Goddamned late)
This is reminiscent of the first American Civil War, when
it was commonplace, even for immediate family members, to
distance themselves, unhesitatingly fight, injure and kill
each other amidst the hellish and sanguinary conflagration.
In deed, the irreconcilable division between patriotic God-
fearing Judeo-Christian Republicans versus the anti-Christ
anti-American Liberals has reached its point of no return.
From this point forward I'll NEVER speak on any good terms
with a Liberal again. I've said it many times before, and
from this point forward I'll repeat it until my dying day:
The only good Liberal is...roasting in Hades.
Considering how the "model" Liberal Democrat Ward Churchill
has openly and repeatedly called for U.S. Military soldiers
to murder their superior officers on the field of combat, I,
Daniel Joseph Min, do with malice of forethought, from here
on out, openly advocate and condone all Republicans to obey
the laws of the land to the LETTER. I mean, don't even spit
on the sidewalk, or jaywalk, but always obey the Law to the
very letter thereof. Let's destroy the Liberals--by the law.
We own all three branches of our beloved Federal Government.
We needn't stoop down to the level of the Liberal barbarian.
Enjoy Life! (fillet a liberal for lunch)
Daniel Joseph Min
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B1CCFE7
*Download Min's Banned (Freeware) Books:
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/
*Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=XJBDEJF138262.9022453704@anonymous.poster
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQ+lGepljD7YrHM/nEQKf+gCggqLgB6vlOlVYNnv7DGXdw4qgJ/sAmwaz
/bO2p4yU011iIT7VdQyTu+UR
=lAj+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
`
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Only Good Liberal `~ |
08 Feb 2006 04:12:05 PM |
|
|
Unless you know Danny boy he is a Dog whistler, he uses propagandist
methods to provoke a reaction, he does not know the difference between
a Liberal and whatever is oppossing that view.
He just rants.
More like a Pitt bull with no teeth.
LB
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Chinese Year of Felicity Huffman" |
|
| Title: Re: The Only Good Liberal `~ |
08 Feb 2006 07:46:10 PM |
|
|
the only good iberal is a powerless liberal with no one depending on
them for a handout. .
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tamara" |
|
| Title: Re: The Only Good Liberal `~ |
08 Feb 2006 09:56:04 PM |
|
|
In article <1139449570.614245.201800@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
"Chinese Year of Felicity Huffman" <gmarx@angelfire.com> wrote:
the only good iberal is a powerless liberal with no one depending on
them for a handout. .
Yawn.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lech Tiezdayen!" |
|
| Title: Re: The Only Good Liberal `~ |
08 Feb 2006 10:17:06 PM |
|
|
Yawn.
It's too bad the truth hurts, Tamara
.
|
|
|
| User: "AKA" |
|
| Title: Re: The Only Good Liberal `~ |
09 Feb 2006 07:49:50 AM |
|
|
"Lech Tiezdayen!" <justanotheranonposter@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1139458626.680399.111890@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Yawn.
It's too bad the truth hurts, Tamara
Yawn
.
|
|
|
| User: "FUGWB" |
|
| Title: Re: The Only Good Liberal is one who euthanizes a Bad Conservative`~~ |
10 Feb 2006 08:35:18 PM |
|
|
"AKA" <fallon@das.com> wrote in message
news:2MHGf.54300$PL5.54193@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com...
"Lech Tiezdayen!" <justanotheranonposter@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1139458626.680399.111890@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Yawn.
It's too bad the truth hurts, Tamara
Yawn
Eat your ***** Count Chocula and watch your stupid fantasy TV shows,
Danny Boy, while we prepare you and your kind for the 'final solution.'
Mince an asstrologer for sandwiches. Add a big dill pickle.
FUGWB
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Chinese Year of Felicity Huffman" |
|
| Title: Re: The Only Good Liberal `~ |
09 Feb 2006 07:55:45 AM |
|
|
yawn ... that's right, libbie, ignore the reality of your own kind.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kalin" |
|
| Title: Re: The Only Good Liberal `~ |
09 Feb 2006 09:14:11 AM |
|
|
In article <1139458626.680399.111890@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
"Lech Tiezdayen!" <justanotheranonposter@yahoo.com> wrote:
Yawn.
It's too bad the truth hurts, Tamara
It's too bad you're clueless.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chinese Year of Felicity Huffman" |
|
| Title: Re: The Only Good Liberal `~ |
09 Feb 2006 09:39:37 AM |
|
|
It's too bad you're clueless.
It's too bad you can only offer an ad hominem dismissal without
explaining why you think that way. I guess being asked to think about
why you say certain things would be too taxing for your apparently
feeble intellect.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kalin" |
|
| Title: Re: The Only Good Liberal `~ |
09 Feb 2006 11:38:30 AM |
|
|
In article <1139499577.879139.76060@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
"Chinese Year of Felicity Huffman" <gmarx@angelfire.com> wrote:
It's too bad you're clueless.
It's too bad you can only offer an ad hominem dismissal without
explaining why you think that way. I guess being asked to think about
why you say certain things would be too taxing for your apparently
feeble intellect.
Zzzzz.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Perseid" |
|
| Title: Re: The Only Good Liberal `~ |
11 Feb 2006 04:30:56 AM |
|
|
The Only Good Liberal... is one that's fucking you up the *****.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
