http://www.drturi.com/vaticanzodiac.html
--
www.drturi.com (Astropsychology, Hypnotherapy, Cabalistic Healing,
Motivational Speaker,
Counselor)
Telephone: 602-265-7667 - Fax: 602-265-8668
Join our Forum and Learn Astropsychology Online -
"Souls who take my self assurance and honesty for an oversized ego suffer a
form of inferiority complex."
Dr.Turi
www.drturi.com/ubbthreads/logout.php?Cat=0
Get our FREE Newsletter - http://www.drturi.com/news/index.html
.
|
|
| User: "=?iso-8859-1?B?TGEgYm91Y2hlIGRlIGxhIHbpcml06SAtIETpauAgVnUgTGUgUHJvcGjpdGU=?=" |
|
| Title: Re: THE POPE AND ASTROLOGY |
17 Jan 2005 02:13:52 AM |
|
|
..
.
|
|
|
| User: "TaDa Pope" |
|
| Title: Re: THE POPE AND ASTROLOGY |
17 Jan 2005 11:00:29 AM |
|
|
I don't beleive in Astrology!
Tangents are infinite in all of nature in
all universes constantly and at random.
* D OUOSVAVV M *
*PUBLIUS ENIGMA*
Oh Joy!
The Psychedelic Pope
Patron Saint of the Internet
http://www.apple2.org.za/gswv/me/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fredrick Garvin" |
|
| Title: Re: THE POPE AND ASTROLOGY |
17 Jan 2005 05:28:25 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:00:29 +0000, TaDa Pope wrote:
I don't beleive in Astrology!
You don't believe in spelling properly either I see....
Religion and astrology are both horseshit.
.
|
|
|
| User: "TaDa Pope" |
|
| Title: Re: THE POPE AND ASTROLOGY |
17 Jan 2005 07:22:37 PM |
|
|
Subject: Re: THE POPE AND ASTROLOGY
From: Fredrick Garvin
Date: 1/17/2005 3:28 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <pan.2005.01.17.23.36.50.463760@elaborate.com>
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:00:29 +0000, TaDa Pope wrote:
I don't beleive in Astrology!
You don't believe in spelling properly either I see....
Religion and astrology are both horseshit.
Oops! My BAD! I guess have Internet dislexia. I know that the i comes before
the e. But, nit pickers like you that catch such sever and blantant errors
have my ut (up) most respect.
You are correct sir. Now I gotta tip on out for a bit. Mama is calling me to
slop
out back.
Tangents are infinite in all of nature in
all universes constantly and at random.
* D OUOSVAVV M *
*PUBLIUS ENIGMA*
Oh Joy!
The Psychedelic Pope
Patron Saint of the Internet
http://www.apple2.org.za/gswv/me/
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "TaDa Pope" |
|
| Title: Re: THE POPE AND ASTROLOGY |
17 Jan 2005 07:24:33 PM |
|
|
BTW, I don't beleive (opps make that)
believe in astrology (did I spell that right?)
either. Oh, I already said that before.
NEVERMIND!
I hereby publicallically declare and denounce it for ever and ever.
Tangents are infinite in all of nature in
all universes constantly and at random.
* D OUOSVAVV M *
*PUBLIUS ENIGMA*
Oh Joy!
The Psychedelic Pope
Patron Saint of the Internet
http://www.apple2.org.za/gswv/me/
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: THE POPE AND ASTROLOGY |
17 Jan 2005 06:08:29 PM |
|
|
Fredrick Garvin wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:00:29 +0000, TaDa Pope wrote:
I don't beleive in Astrology!
You don't believe in spelling properly either I see....
Religion and astrology are both horseshit.
Here's an interesting breakdown from the Sunday Times Rich list 2004
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2108-1067034,00.html
Gemini 110
Taurus 104
Aries 95
Capricorn 92
Aquarius 91
Virgo 88
Libra 87
Leo 84
Sagittarius 84
Cancer 80
Scorpio 79
Pisces 73
That *seems* like a rather wide distribution for something that ought to
be random.
And guess what? Geminis are traditionally noted for their fiscal acumen
and Pisceans are noted as not.
In 1951 RCA set up a commission to discover the cause of sunspots,
already known as an annoying source of radio interference. John H Nelson
discovered that sunspots occurred whenever two or more of the planets
Mars, Jupiter and Saturn were in conjunction, opposition or square, and
was able to predict sunspots with ninety per cent accuracy.
The Royal Astronomical Society astronomer Dr. Percy Seymour has put
forward some interesting ideas on how the relative planetary positions
*might* exert an influence.
-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: THE POPE AND ASTROLOGY |
17 Jan 2005 07:58:36 PM |
|
|
Absolute Zero wrote:
Fredrick Garvin wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:00:29 +0000, TaDa Pope wrote:
I don't beleive in Astrology!
You don't believe in spelling properly either I see....
Religion and astrology are both horseshit.
Here's an interesting breakdown from the Sunday Times Rich list 2004
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2108-1067034,00.html
Gemini 110
Taurus 104
Aries 95
Capricorn 92
Aquarius 91
Virgo 88
Libra 87
Leo 84
Sagittarius 84
Cancer 80
Scorpio 79
Pisces 73
That *seems* like a rather wide distribution for something that ought to
be random.
And guess what? Geminis are traditionally noted for their fiscal acumen
and Pisceans are noted as not.
In 1951 RCA set up a commission to discover the cause of sunspots,
already known as an annoying source of radio interference. John H Nelson
discovered that sunspots occurred whenever two or more of the planets
Mars, Jupiter and Saturn were in conjunction, opposition or square, and
was able to predict sunspots with ninety per cent accuracy.
The Royal Astronomical Society astronomer Dr. Percy Seymour has put
forward some interesting ideas on how the relative planetary positions
*might* exert an influence.
-A
BTW, I'm not saying that I take daily sun sign astrology too seriously
(though it can be legitimately used like a Rorschach test) but blank and
absolute dismissal is as unscientific as that you call horse doo-doos,
Horatio.
-A
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: THE POPE AND ASTROLOGY |
19 Jan 2005 10:37:47 AM |
|
|
Absolute Zero wrote:
Fredrick Garvin wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:00:29 +0000, TaDa Pope wrote:
I don't beleive in Astrology!
You don't believe in spelling properly either I see....
Religion and astrology are both horseshit.
Here's an interesting breakdown from the Sunday Times Rich list 2004
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2108-1067034,00.html
Gemini 110
Taurus 104
Aries 95
Capricorn 92
Aquarius 91
Virgo 88
Libra 87
Leo 84
Sagittarius 84
Cancer 80
Scorpio 79
Pisces 73
That *seems* like a rather wide distribution for something that ought to
be random.
And guess what? Geminis are traditionally noted for their fiscal acumen
and Pisceans are noted as not.
In 1951 RCA set up a commission to discover the cause of sunspots,
already known as an annoying source of radio interference. John H Nelson
discovered that sunspots occurred whenever two or more of the planets
Mars, Jupiter and Saturn were in conjunction, opposition or square, and
was able to predict sunspots with ninety per cent accuracy.
No debate?
If you're wondering why you've never heard of this (RCA, Nelson) work,
it was pretty much ignored/buried... for fairly obvious reasons.
The best I've managed to find in terms of a re-evaluation is this.
http://www.eham.net/articles/8828
Seems the claimed accuracy was 85% not 90%
Can science be unscientific? Ask yourself why we tolerate a theory of
the Universe that relies of three hypothetical entities, dark matter,
dark energy and inflation... with the dark energy field violating one of
the best-tested laws of physics--the conservation of energy and matter.
-A
The Royal Astronomical Society astronomer Dr. Percy Seymour has put
forward some interesting ideas on how the relative planetary positions
*might* exert an influence.
-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "Grantland" |
|
| Title: Re: THE POPE AND ASTROLOGY |
19 Jan 2005 11:11:14 AM |
|
|
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
Can science be unscientific? Ask yourself why we tolerate a theory of
the Universe that relies of three hypothetical entities, dark matter,
dark energy and inflation... with the dark energy field violating one of
the best-tested laws of physics--the conservation of energy and matter.
-A
May I ask why the missing mass cannot be accounted for by a plethora
of mega black holes, including those at the centre of all galaxies and
ex-galaxies.
G
.
|
|
|
| User: "TaDa Pope" |
|
| Title: Re: THE POPE AND ASTROLOGY |
20 Jan 2005 06:36:42 PM |
|
|
Subject: Re: THE POPE AND ASTROLOGY
From: (Grantland)
Date: 1/19/2005 9:11 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <41ee941e.372473909@ct-news.iafrica.com>
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
Can science be unscientific? Ask yourself why we tolerate a theory of
the Universe that relies of three hypothetical entities, dark matter,
dark energy and inflation... with the dark energy field violating one of
the best-tested laws of physics--the conservation of energy and matter.
-A
May I ask why the missing mass cannot be accounted for by a plethora
of mega black holes, including those at the centre of all galaxies and
ex-galaxies.
G
That's what happened to all the Myans
you know - they got sucked into a black
hole as a result of consuming to many magic mushrooms.
Tangents are infinite in all of nature in
all universes constantly and at random.
* D OUOSVAVV M *
*PUBLIUS ENIGMA*
Oh Joy!
The Psychedelic Pope
Patron Saint of the Internet
http://www.apple2.org.za/gswv/me/
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: THE POPE AND ASTROLOGY |
19 Jan 2005 11:20:08 AM |
|
|
Grantland wrote:
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
Can science be unscientific? Ask yourself why we tolerate a theory of
the Universe that relies of three hypothetical entities, dark matter,
dark energy and inflation... with the dark energy field violating one of
the best-tested laws of physics--the conservation of energy and matter.
-A
May I ask why the missing mass cannot be accounted for by a plethora
of mega black holes, including those at the centre of all galaxies and
ex-galaxies.
That could cover it, but it isn’t even needed. Discoveries of white
dwarfs (dead stars) in the halo of our galaxy and warm plasma clouds in
the local group of galaxies show that there is enough ordinary matter to
account for the gravitational effects observed.
That being so, there's no room for dark matter.
-A
.
|
|
|
| User: "Grantland" |
|
| Title: Re: THE POPE AND ASTROLOGY |
19 Jan 2005 11:26:49 AM |
|
|
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
Grantland wrote:
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
Can science be unscientific? Ask yourself why we tolerate a theory of
the Universe that relies of three hypothetical entities, dark matter,
dark energy and inflation... with the dark energy field violating one of
the best-tested laws of physics--the conservation of energy and matter.
-A
May I ask why the missing mass cannot be accounted for by a plethora
of mega black holes, including those at the centre of all galaxies and
ex-galaxies.
That could cover it, but it isn’t even needed. Discoveries of white
dwarfs (dead stars) in the halo of our galaxy and warm plasma clouds in
the local group of galaxies show that there is enough ordinary matter to
account for the gravitational effects observed.
That being so, there's no room for dark matter.
-A
I must inform you that such mega black holes are, in fact ubiquitous.
Like life.
G
.
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: THE POPE AND ASTROLOGY |
19 Jan 2005 11:36:50 AM |
|
|
Grantland wrote:
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
Grantland wrote:
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
Can science be unscientific? Ask yourself why we tolerate a theory of
the Universe that relies of three hypothetical entities, dark matter,
dark energy and inflation... with the dark energy field violating one of
the best-tested laws of physics--the conservation of energy and matter.
-A
May I ask why the missing mass cannot be accounted for by a plethora
of mega black holes, including those at the centre of all galaxies and
ex-galaxies.
That could cover it, but it isn’t even needed. Discoveries of white
dwarfs (dead stars) in the halo of our galaxy and warm plasma clouds in
the local group of galaxies show that there is enough ordinary matter to
account for the gravitational effects observed.
That being so, there's no room for dark matter.
-A
I must inform you that such mega black holes are, in fact ubiquitous.
Like life.
Sure, I would suggest that black holes possibly seeded the galaxies.
Whatever, I'm not arguing, my point is that dark matter is redundant.
-A
G
.
|
|
|
| User: "Grantland" |
|
| Title: Re: THE POPE AND ASTROLOGY |
19 Jan 2005 11:49:17 AM |
|
|
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
Grantland wrote:
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
Grantland wrote:
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
Can science be unscientific? Ask yourself why we tolerate a theory of
the Universe that relies of three hypothetical entities, dark matter,
dark energy and inflation... with the dark energy field violating one of
the best-tested laws of physics--the conservation of energy and matter.
-A
May I ask why the missing mass cannot be accounted for by a plethora
of mega black holes, including those at the centre of all galaxies and
ex-galaxies.
That could cover it, but it isn’t even needed. Discoveries of white
dwarfs (dead stars) in the halo of our galaxy and warm plasma clouds in
the local group of galaxies show that there is enough ordinary matter to
account for the gravitational effects observed.
That being so, there's no room for dark matter.
-A
I must inform you that such mega black holes are, in fact ubiquitous.
Like life.
Sure, I would suggest that black holes possibly seeded the galaxies.
Whatever, I'm not arguing, my point is that dark matter is redundant.
-A
Something else is redundant. The dark matter exists.
G
.
|
|
|
| User: "TaDa Pope" |
|
| Title: Re: THE POPE AND ASTROLOGY |
20 Jan 2005 06:40:05 PM |
|
|
Subject: Re: THE POPE AND ASTROLOGY
From: (Grantland)
Date: 1/19/2005 9:49 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <41ee9d73.374862293@ct-news.iafrica.com>
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
Grantland wrote:
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
Grantland wrote:
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
Can science be unscientific? Ask yourself why we tolerate a theory of
the Universe that relies of three hypothetical entities, dark matter,
dark energy and inflation... with the dark energy field violating one of
the best-tested laws of physics--the conservation of energy and matter.
-A
May I ask why the missing mass cannot be accounted for by a plethora
of mega black holes, including those at the centre of all galaxies and
ex-galaxies.
That could cover it, but it isn’t even needed. Discoveries of white
dwarfs (dead stars) in the halo of our galaxy and warm plasma clouds in
the local group of galaxies show that there is enough ordinary matter to
account for the gravitational effects observed.
That being so, there's no room for dark matter.
-A
I must inform you that such mega black holes are, in fact ubiquitous.
Like life.
Sure, I would suggest that black holes possibly seeded the galaxies.
Whatever, I'm not arguing, my point is that dark matter is redundant.
-A
Something else is redundant. The dark matter exists.
G
Dark matter is REAL and goes and comes
in standard cycles like all else in our universe. Fields within fields within
fields
and cycles within cycles within cycles.
It's all good.
Don't fret over the past.
Don't worry about the
future. Enjoy the present.
Tangents are infinite in all of nature in
all universes constantly and at random.
* D OUOSVAVV M *
*PUBLIUS ENIGMA*
Oh Joy!
The Psychedelic Pope
Patron Saint of the Internet
http://www.apple2.org.za/gswv/me/
.
|
|
|
| User: "=?iso-8859-1?B?TGEgYm91Y2hlIGRlIGxhIHbpcml06SAtIETpauAgVnUgTGUgUHJvcGjpdGU=?=" |
|
| Title: Re: THE POPE AND ASTROLOGY |
20 Jan 2005 08:08:29 PM |
|
|
TaDa Pope wrote:
Subject: Re: THE POPE AND ASTROLOGY
From: (Grantland)
Date: 1/19/2005 9:49 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <41ee9d73.374862293@ct-news.iafrica.com>
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
Grantland wrote:
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
Grantland wrote:
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
Can science be unscientific? Ask yourself why we tolerate a
theory of
the Universe that relies of three hypothetical entities, dark
matter,
dark energy and inflation... with the dark energy field
violating one of
the best-tested laws of physics--the conservation of energy and
matter.
-A
May I ask why the missing mass cannot be accounted for by a
plethora
of mega black holes, including those at the centre of all
galaxies and
ex-galaxies.
That could cover it, but it isn't even needed. Discoveries of
white
dwarfs (dead stars) in the halo of our galaxy and warm plasma
clouds in
the local group of galaxies show that there is enough ordinary
matter to
account for the gravitational effects observed.
That being so, there's no room for dark matter.
-A
I must inform you that such mega black holes are, in fact
ubiquitous.
Like life.
Sure, I would suggest that black holes possibly seeded the
galaxies.
Whatever, I'm not arguing, my point is that dark matter is
redundant.
-A
Something else is redundant. The dark matter exists.
G
Dark matter is REAL and goes and comes
in standard cycles like all else in our universe. Fields within
fields within
fields
and cycles within cycles within cycles.
It's all good.
Don't fret over the past.
Don't worry about the
future. Enjoy the present.
Tangents are infinite in all of nature in
all universes constantly and at random.
* D OUOSVAVV M *
*PUBLIUS ENIGMA*
Oh Joy!
The Psychedelic Pope
Patron Saint of the Internet
http://www.apple2.org.za/gswv/me/
Oooooh, I just luuuuurv 'presents', little buddy !!! ;-)
Hooroo / Toodles ;-)
Uncle Wally ;-)
========================================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: THE POPE AND ASTROLOGY |
21 Jan 2005 12:39:02 AM |
|
|
On 20 Jan 2005 18:08:29 -0800, "La bouche de la vérité - Déjà Vu Le
Prophéte" <yessireeyesindeedydo@yahoo.ca> wrote:
TaDa Pope wrote:
Subject: Re: THE POPE AND ASTROLOGY
From: (Grantland)
Date: 1/19/2005 9:49 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: <41ee9d73.374862293@ct-news.iafrica.com>
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
Grantland wrote:
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
Grantland wrote:
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
Can science be unscientific? Ask yourself why we tolerate a
theory of
the Universe that relies of three hypothetical entities, dark
matter,
dark energy and inflation... with the dark energy field
violating one of
the best-tested laws of physics--the conservation of energy and
matter.
-A
May I ask why the missing mass cannot be accounted for by a
plethora
of mega black holes, including those at the centre of all
galaxies and
ex-galaxies.
That could cover it, but it isn't even needed. Discoveries of
white
dwarfs (dead stars) in the halo of our galaxy and warm plasma
clouds in
the local group of galaxies show that there is enough ordinary
matter to
account for the gravitational effects observed.
That being so, there's no room for dark matter.
-A
I must inform you that such mega black holes are, in fact
ubiquitous.
Like life.
Sure, I would suggest that black holes possibly seeded the
galaxies.
Whatever, I'm not arguing, my point is that dark matter is
redundant.
-A
Something else is redundant. The dark matter exists.
G
Dark matter is REAL and goes and comes
in standard cycles like all else in our universe. Fields within
fields within
fields
and cycles within cycles within cycles.
It's all good.
Don't fret over the past.
Don't worry about the
future. Enjoy the present.
Tangents are infinite in all of nature in
all universes constantly and at random.
* D OUOSVAVV M *
*PUBLIUS ENIGMA*
Oh Joy!
The Psychedelic Pope
Patron Saint of the Internet
http://www.apple2.org.za/gswv/me/
Oooooh, I just luuuuurv 'presents', little buddy !!! ;-)
Me too, Uncle Wally.. that's why I buy myself them all the time :)
...hmmm - what should I get me for Valentines day?
Shoes? Noooooo! That, that would just be unheard of! hehe..
Speaking of which......
Have you ever watched the show 'Sex in the City'? Well, one of the
women was out on a date, and she said to the man she was with:
"I have a confession to make.. I'm an addict" - the man looked
concerned. Then she paused for a moment and said: "I'm addicted
to shoes." .. lol.
I just got a kick out of it 'cause I can relate! ;)
Niece Dani wishing you a truly wondrous night...
Hooroo / Toodles ;-)
Uncle Wally ;-)
========================================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "=?iso-8859-1?B?TGEgYm91Y2hlIGRlIGxhIHbpcml06SAtIETpauAgVnUgTGUgUHJvcGjpdGU=?=" |
|
| Title: Re: THE POPE AND ASTROLOGY |
21 Jan 2005 03:01:45 AM |
|
|
HOOROO 2U2 !!!!
Uncle Wally ;-)
=============
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "=?iso-8859-1?B?TGEgYm91Y2hlIGRlIGxhIHbpcml06SAtIETpauAgVnUgTGUgUHJvcGjpdGU=?=" |
|
| Title: Re: THE POPE AND ASTROLOGY |
21 Jan 2005 02:12:38 AM |
|
|
I especially liked the quote by Samantha:
"And you should see the bush on him. I need a weedwacker just to find
his *****!"
SEX & THE CITY QUOTABLE QUOTES:
http://www.filmfodder.com/tv/sex_and_the_city/episodes/quotes.htm
Hooroo / Toodles ;-)
Uncle Wally ;-)
==============================
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Komin" |
|
| Title: Re: THE POPE AND ASTROLOGY |
20 Jan 2005 10:10:01 PM |
|
|
the Pope is a religious Mafia state leader who wants to control the
world's population.
Christians killed million of Jews inside the Euroland in the past 2000
years ..
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Absolute Zero" |
|
| Title: Re: THE POPE AND ASTROLOGY |
19 Jan 2005 11:59:29 AM |
|
|
Grantland wrote:
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
Grantland wrote:
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
Grantland wrote:
Absolute Zero <amycaton@hotmail.com> wrote:
Can science be unscientific? Ask yourself why we tolerate a theory of
the Universe that relies of three hypothetical entities, dark matter,
dark energy and inflation... with the dark energy field violating one of
the best-tested laws of physics--the conservation of energy and matter.
-A
May I ask why the missing mass cannot be accounted for by a plethora
of mega black holes, including those at the centre of all galaxies and
ex-galaxies.
That could cover it, but it isn’t even needed. Discoveries of white
dwarfs (dead stars) in the halo of our galaxy and warm plasma clouds in
the local group of galaxies show that there is enough ordinary matter to
account for the gravitational effects observed.
That being so, there's no room for dark matter.
-A
I must inform you that such mega black holes are, in fact ubiquitous.
Like life.
Sure, I would suggest that black holes possibly seeded the galaxies.
Whatever, I'm not arguing, my point is that dark matter is redundant.
-A
Something else is redundant. The dark matter exists.
We can bet. So i'd better be explicit... non-baryonic dark matter
doesn't exist.
-A
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "=?iso-8859-1?B?TGEgYm91Y2hlIGRlIGxhIHbpcml06SAtIETpauAgVnUgTGUgUHJvcGjpdGU=?=" |
|
| Title: Re: THE POPE AND ASTROLOGY |
17 Jan 2005 08:15:57 PM |
|
|
TaDa Pope wrote:
I don't beleive in Astrology!
Tangents are infinite in all of nature in
all universes constantly and at random.
* D OUOSVAVV M *
*PUBLIUS ENIGMA*
Oh Joy!
The Psychedelic Pope
Patron Saint of the Internet
http://www.apple2.org.za/gswv/me/
Remember, little buddy ;-)
i b4 e except after c !!!
The Golden Rule of Spelling !!!
Hooroo / Toodles ;-)
Uncle Wally ;-)
====================================
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: THE POPE AND ASTROLOGY |
21 Jan 2005 01:25:31 AM |
|
|
On 17 Jan 2005 00:13:52 -0800, "La bouche de la vérité - Déjà Vu Le
Prophéte" <yessireeyesindeedydo@yahoo.ca> wrote:
.
,
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
