The racist Dems
By Kevin McCullough
Posted: January 21, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
2005 WorldNetDaily.com
In the all too brief new legislative session, I've seen more bad behavior from
congressional Democrats than in the previous two months combined. But the
incredibly antagonistic attitudes that they have exhibited this week bring up
some important realizations.
The main one being liberal Senate Democrats are racists acting with the cover
of the national media.
To prove my point, try the shoe on the other foot for a moment.
Pretend the nightmare of an Al Gore administration had come to pass. Pretend
also that he had decided to name Donna Brazile as his secretary of state.
Pretend with me that Brazile had gone up to be confirmed and Republican
senators began to harass her for any of the millions of silly things she had
said in her public career. And imagine if Batty Uncle Arlen had slipped off his
meds and said something along the lines of Brazile not having integrity on
international relationships because she once said something naughty about
"white boys."
The headlines would scream it across the front pages of America the next
morning: "GOP SENATOR PICKS ON AFRICAN AMERICAN NOMINEE!"
Now suppose that a couple of Republican senators decide to take matters into
their own hands and even though the nominee had been voted out of committee and
to the floor they wanted to spike the nomination for a while simply because
"they hadn't read the transcripts."
Well I think you get the picture – and we both know what would happen.
The GOP would have a public-relations crisis on their hands the size of Batty
Uncle Arlen's ego.
Yet the reverse is happening consistently with malcontents who feign an
existence as liberal United States senators and nary a word is printed. How
come?
Am I the only one in the room who sees a small issue of prejudice in allowing
the former Grand Kleagle of the Ku Klux Klan to allow such an obstruction in
the path of getting on with the people's business for 2005? And let's be clear
here: Donna Brazile ain't no Condoleezza Rice. In fact, I doubt five or six
Donna Braziles would be.
A senator who admits to having held a position where he hated people simply
because of the color of their skin is bad enough. Allowing "Senator Mumbly" to
go on network television and use the "N" word in recent years is even worse.
But having him put the kibosh on the most qualified African American woman ever
to be elevated to the position that she is seeking is horrible.
And it's not just Byrd.
Sen. Edward Kennedy – you know him as "Martini" – has decided to pull the
same stunt against Alberto Gonzales, the first Latino to ever be named to the
post of attorney general. Come to think of it "Senator Beer Gut" also had
nasty, pointed things to say about Miguel Estrada.
So Sen. Kennedy stalls on Hispanics, and Byrd is still trying to hide the white
sheets from view, but won't let a gifted African American take her place in
history.
For all the discussion that the Democratic Party tries to put forward about
diversity, they seem be quite intolerant of it.
What they actually desire are ideological clones that believe, walk, dress,
sit, eat, drink (Kennedy) and in Byrd's case spit up exactly like them. For
"minorities" who choose not to, well, then they must all be put under spell of
the evil witch-dwarf Barbara Boxer.
All this and they throw in Howard Dean for the party chairmanship for free!
And with the emergence of the blogosphere, one thing is certain: Even if the
mainstream media chooses to look the other way on all of the bad behavior –
bloggers won't, nor Brit Hume, nor talk radio.
Eventually – like the sewer – all this stuff will back up on them. Racism
is seen for what it is.
And where it's practiced most in America today seems to be among elite, white,
liberal, Democratic senators.
Kevin McCullough is heard daily from 1 to 4 p.m. EST in New York City on AM 570
WMCA, and in New Jersey on AM 970 WWDJ. Additionally, you can read his daily
postings at The KMC Blog.
.
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: The racist Dems |
21 Jan 2005 11:06:23 PM |
|
|
(TonyZ2001) Spat the Words
The racist Dems
By Kevin McCullough
Posted: January 21, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
2005 WorldNetDaily.com
I'm very impressed with Barbara Boxer. She's giving the neocons
and Bush monkeys a dose of reality they desperately need. Calling
Condi Rice a liar was a good start, but Barbara let Condi off too
easily.
In the all too brief new legislative session, I've seen more bad
behavior from congressional Democrats than in the previous two months
combined. But the incredibly antagonistic attitudes that they have
exhibited this week bring up some important realizations.
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: The racist Dems |
22 Jan 2005 10:21:56 AM |
|
|
"R. Foreman" >eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net
wrote:
I'm very impressed with Barbara Boxer.
A moron like you would be.
She's giving the neocons
and Bush monkeys a dose of reality they desperately need. Calling
Condi Rice a liar was a good start, but Barbara let Condi off too
easily.
If the political parties were reversed you'd be calling Boxer a racist, proving
what a lying hypocrite you are.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: The racist Dems |
22 Jan 2005 10:27:53 PM |
|
|
(TonyZ2001) Spat the Words
"R. Foreman" >eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net
wrote:
I'm very impressed with Barbara Boxer.
A moron like you would be.
She's giving the neocons
and Bush monkeys a dose of reality they desperately need. Calling
Condi Rice a liar was a good start, but Barbara let Condi off too
easily.
If the political parties were reversed you'd be calling Boxer a racist,
proving what a lying hypocrite you are.
That's a lot of assumptions Tony. Can't you come back to
reality for even a moment?
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: The racist Dems |
23 Jan 2005 05:02:00 AM |
|
|
R. Foreman" >eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net
wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) Spat the Words
"R. Foreman" >eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net
wrote:
I'm very impressed with Barbara Boxer.
A moron like you would be.
She's giving the neocons
and Bush monkeys a dose of reality they desperately need. Calling
Condi Rice a liar was a good start, but Barbara let Condi off too
easily.
If the political parties were reversed you'd be calling Boxer a racist,
proving what a lying hypocrite you are.
That's a lot of assumptions Tony. Can't >you come back to reality for even a
moment?
That is reality you fool.
Anytime a Republican President nominates a black or hispanic for a job, you
Liberals attack them with a vengence.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "R. Foreman" |
|
| Title: Re: The racist Dems |
23 Jan 2005 12:29:42 PM |
|
|
(TonyZ2001) Spat the Words
R. Foreman" >eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net
wrote:
(TonyZ2001) Spat the Words
"R. Foreman" >eidpers@anti-spam.comcast.net
wrote:
I'm very impressed with Barbara Boxer.
A moron like you would be.
She's giving the neocons
and Bush monkeys a dose of reality they desperately need. Calling
Condi Rice a liar was a good start, but Barbara let Condi off too
easily.
If the political parties were reversed you'd be calling Boxer a
racist, proving what a lying hypocrite you are.
That's a lot of assumptions Tony. Can't >you come back to reality for
even a moment?
That is reality you fool.
Anytime a Republican President nominates a black or hispanic for a job,
you Liberals attack them with a vengence.
I think the dems are impartial in their attacks. They attack a
stupid white male cowboy from texas as readily as a stupid black,
lying, female, brainiac-wannabe.
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: The racist Dems |
23 Jan 2005 06:21:27 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 22:27:53 -0600, "R. Foreman"
<> wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) Spat the Words
"R. Foreman"
wrote:
I'm very impressed with Barbara Boxer.
A moron like you would be.
She's giving the neocons
and Bush monkeys a dose of reality they desperately need. Calling
Condi Rice a liar was a good start, but Barbara let Condi off too
easily.
If the political parties were reversed you'd be calling Boxer a racist,
proving what a lying hypocrite you are.
That's a lot of assumptions Tony. Can't you come back to
reality for even a moment?
Don't even think a thing of it, Randy - that's Tone's standard reply
to nearly everyone. He has a few different versions - but all in all,
it boils down to the same redundant *****. He can't come up with
much more to say other than school-yard insults. Never anything
of substance - never anything to provoke thought.
Pity him. A 7 year olds (mentality) stuck in a 48 year olds
(physical) body.
For example: The other day he called you "clueless".. and in this
post he has called you a "moron" for your opinion (mind you, one
cannot be wrong when it comes to their personal opinion).
And a "lying hypocrite" who he (Tony) believes your views of people
are purely political (ie: you don't see the *person* - only the
politics). Which happens to be projection on his part because he
*never* sees people, only politics.
And need I even mention that his calling you a "moron" and "clueless"
(without a single intellectual rebuttal) is also pure projection?
Dani
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: The racist Dems |
23 Jan 2005 07:05:07 AM |
|
|
Dani
wrote:
"R. Foreman"
< > wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) Spat the Words
"R. Foreman"
wrote:
I'm very impressed with Barbara Boxer.
A moron like you would be.
She's giving the neocons
and Bush monkeys a dose of reality they desperately need. Calling
Condi Rice a liar was a good start, but Barbara let Condi off too
easily.
If the political parties were reversed you'd be calling Boxer a racist,
proving what a lying hypocrite you >>>are.
That's a lot of assumptions Tony. Can't >>you come back to
reality for even a moment?
Don't even think a thing of it, Randy - that's Tone's standard reply
to nearly everyone. He has a few different versions - but all in all,
it boils down to the same redundant *****. He can't come up with
much more to say other than school-yard insults. Never anything
of substance - never anything to provoke >thought.
Pity him. A 7 year olds (mentality) stuck >in a 48 year olds (physical) body.
Now I'm 48? How many other misconceptions do you have about me?
For example: The other day he called you "clueless".. and in this
post he has called you a "moron" for your opinion (mind you, one
cannot be wrong when it comes to their personal opinion).
And a "lying hypocrite" who he (Tony) believes your views of people
are purely political (ie: you don't see the *person* - only the
politics). Which happens to be projection on his part because he
*never* sees people, only politics.
And need I even mention that his calling you a "moron" and "clueless"
(without a single intellectual rebuttal) is also pure projection?
Dani
Get over me already, all you've done since your return is reply to my posts,
then you want to calim that I am stalking you. LOL!!!
Go talk to your racist Uncle.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dani" |
|
| Title: Re: The racist Dems |
26 Jan 2005 09:46:34 PM |
|
|
On 23 Jan 2005 13:05:07 GMT, (TonyZ2001) wrote:
Dani
wrote:
"R. Foreman"
< > wrote:
(TonyZ2001) Spat the Words
"R. Foreman"
wrote:
I'm very impressed with Barbara Boxer.
A moron like you would be.
She's giving the neocons
and Bush monkeys a dose of reality they desperately need. Calling
Condi Rice a liar was a good start, but Barbara let Condi off too
easily.
If the political parties were reversed you'd be calling Boxer a racist,
proving what a lying hypocrite you >>>are.
That's a lot of assumptions Tony. Can't >>you come back to
reality for even a moment?
Don't even think a thing of it, Randy - that's Tone's standard reply
to nearly everyone. He has a few different versions - but all in all,
it boils down to the same redundant *****. He can't come up with
much more to say other than school-yard insults. Never anything
of substance - never anything to provoke >thought.
Pity him. A 7 year olds (mentality) stuck >in a 48 year olds (physical) body.
Now I'm 48? How many other misconceptions do you have about me?
Oops - my bad. When I came here three years ago you said you were 46,
so that would make you 49 now.
For example: The other day he called you "clueless".. and in this
post he has called you a "moron" for your opinion (mind you, one
cannot be wrong when it comes to their personal opinion).
And a "lying hypocrite" who he (Tony) believes your views of people
are purely political (ie: you don't see the *person* - only the
politics). Which happens to be projection on his part because he
*never* sees people, only politics.
And need I even mention that his calling you a "moron" and "clueless"
(without a single intellectual rebuttal) is also pure projection?
Get over me already, all you've done since your return is reply to my posts,
then you want to calim that I am stalking you. LOL!!!
So in other words...everything I said above is true, and yet again you
can't admit that you're wrong.
And btw, when you returned from your "vacation" and went after nearly
everyone of my posts - how many time did I tell you to *****?
(***** meaning: leave me alone, stay away from me, I want nothing
to do with you etc..). But you refused.. yup, you straight out
refused. And if you don't remember - google does. So hey, I gave you
a chance by telling you to stay away from me; but instead, you invited
me. So don't whine now when I "attack" you - you basically begged for
it.
Go talk to your racist Uncle.
And say what? "Are you coming over for brunch this Sunday?" "How's
it going at work?"
(what an idiot.)
Dani
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Woodswun" |
|
| Title: Re: The racist Dems |
22 Jan 2005 04:06:23 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 23:06:23 -0600, R. Foreman wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) Spat the Words
The racist Dems
By Kevin McCullough
Posted: January 21, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
2005 WorldNetDaily.com
I'm very impressed with Barbara Boxer. She's giving the neocons
and Bush monkeys a dose of reality they desperately need. Calling
Condi Rice a liar was a good start, but Barbara let Condi off too
easily.
That's not racism, that's being truthful. Racism would be along the lines
of saying Rice must be a liar because she's black. Calling someone a liar
because they lie on a regular basis is just telling it like it is.
I find it mildly amusing that the white supremacist thinks that's racism,
though, but not his "keep the White race pure" crap isn't.
Woods
.
|
|
|
| User: "TonyZ2001" |
|
| Title: Re: The racist Dems |
23 Jan 2005 05:00:17 AM |
|
|
Woodswun
wrote:
R. Foreman wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) Spat the Words
The racist Dems
By Kevin McCullough
Posted: January 21, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
2005 WorldNetDaily.com
I'm very impressed with Barbara Boxer. She's giving the neocons
and Bush monkeys a dose of reality they desperately need. Calling
Condi Rice a liar was a good start, but Barbara let Condi off too
easily.
That's not racism, that's being truthful. >Racism would be along the lines
of saying Rice must be a liar because >she's black. Calling someone a liar
because they lie on a regular basis is >just telling it like it is.
Hey Clueless, you know damn well that if the party ties were reversed that
you'd be calling this racism, so stop lying.
Tony
.
|
|
|
| User: "tw" |
|
| Title: Re: The racist Dems |
25 Jan 2005 06:14:44 AM |
|
|
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20050123060017.27430.00000247@mb-m17.aol.com...
Woodswun
wrote:
R. Foreman wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) Spat the Words
The racist Dems
By Kevin McCullough
Posted: January 21, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
2005 WorldNetDaily.com
I'm very impressed with Barbara Boxer. She's giving the neocons
and Bush monkeys a dose of reality they desperately need. Calling
Condi Rice a liar was a good start, but Barbara let Condi off too
easily.
That's not racism, that's being truthful. >Racism would be along the
lines
of saying Rice must be a liar because >she's black. Calling someone a
liar
because they lie on a regular basis is >just telling it like it is.
Hey Clueless, you know damn well that if the party ties were reversed that
you'd be calling this racism, so stop lying.
ASSuming again, eh Tone? Got any evidence to back your laughable assertion
up? Of course you haven't..
Tony
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "MonsieurStat" |
|
| Title: Re: The racist Dems |
22 Jan 2005 11:21:25 AM |
|
|
R. Foreman wrote:
tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) Spat the Words
The racist Dems
By Kevin McCullough
Posted: January 21, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
2005 WorldNetDaily.com
I'm very impressed with Barbara Boxer. She's giving the neocons
and Bush monkeys a dose of reality they desperately need. Calling
Condi Rice a liar was a good start, but Barbara let Condi off too
easily.
I liked the exchange between the republican senator Lincoln Chafee and
Rice. He cornered her into admitting that she has no regards
what-so-ever for democracy. Here's the transcript of that exchange.
SENATOR LINCOLN CHAFEE: It seems to be a hypocritical approach to our
foreign policy in some ways, in particular how we deal with some of
those democracies such as Russia, Senator Biden said, uneven or
undemocratic or some of the Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, even
Musharraf, President Musharraf, and then on the other hand have a
completely different view of, say, Iran, as Senator Biden was saying. It
seems to magnify our differences on one hand and on the other hand, we
magnify our similarities. In particular after having just come back from
South America and meeting with President Chavez. Here he has gone before
his people, high, high turnout. Just had a referendum, and as one of the
people from our embassy said, they cleaned their clocks and kicked their
butts. It seems to me to say derogatory things about him may be
disrespectful to him, but also to the Venezuelan people. How do you
react to that?
CONDOLEEZZA RICE: Well, I have nothing but good things to say about the
Venezuelan people. They are a remarkable people, and if you notice,
Senator Chafee, I was not making derogatory comments, I was simply
recognizing that there are unhelpful and unconstructive trends going on
in Venezuelan policies. This is not personal.
SENATOR LINCOLN CHAFEE: And there aren’t in Tajikistan, Uzbekistan --
CONDOLEEZZA RICE: And we --
SENATOR LINCOLN CHAFEE: -- and Russia and --
CONDOLEEZZA RICE: And we speak out about those.
SENATOR LINCOLN CHAFEE: Pakistan?
CONDOLEEZZA RICE: We speak out about those as well, but some of this is
a matter of trend lines and where countries have been, and where they
are now going.
SENATOR LINCOLN CHAFEE: Are their governments unconstructive?
CONDOLEEZZA RICE: Well, the Russian government is not unconstructive in
a lot of areas. It's quite constructive in many areas. It's been more
constructive on Iran in recent years. It is constructive on -- to a
certain extent in trying to deal with the kind of Nunn-Lugar issues that
we have talked about. It's been constructive in Afghanistan. It's
constructive on a number of areas, but that doesn't excuse what is
happening inside Russia where the concentration of power in the Kremlin,
to the detriment of other institutions, is a real problem. And we will
continue to speak to the Russians. I think we do have to remember that
it is also not the Soviet Union. The Russians have come quite a long way
from where the Soviet Union was, and we need to always keep that in mind
when we judge current policies, but where they're going is simply not
very good. It is something to be deeply concerned about, and we will
speak out. Countries are going to move at different speeds on this
democracy test. I don't think there's any doubt about that. But what we
have to do is that we have to keep the agenda -- keep this item on the
agenda. We have to continue to press countries about it. We have to
support democratic forces and civil society forces wherever we can. I
would just note that Ukraine, I visited in 2001, not long after I had
become National Security Adviser, and I frankly when this happened in
Ukraine was pretty stunned by how effective civil society was and how
effective the Ukrainian people were in making their voices known. Some
of that is because we and the E.U. and others have spent time developing
civil society, developing political opposition, working with people, not
to have a specific candidate in any of these countries, but to have a
political process that's open. And we have to do more of that. We're
going to spend some $43 million this year, I believe that's the number,
on Russian institutions, trying to help the development of civil society
there. We need to do more of that kind of thing, because while we put it
on an agenda, while we confront the governments that are engaged in
non-democratic activities, we also have to help the development of civil
society in opposition.
SENATOR LINCOLN CHAFEE: You and Senator Boxer were having a little bit
of a debate over credibility, and to me, it seems as though trust is
built with consistency. Is it possible for you to say something positive
about the Chavez administration?
CONDOLEEZZA RICE: It's pretty hard, Senator, to find something positive.
Let me say this.
SENATOR LINCOLN CHAFEE: I don’t understand that, after Tajikistan --
CONDOLEEZZA RICE: Let me say this.
SENATOR LINCOLN CHAFEE: -- Pakistan, Russia. It seems as though, as I
say, magnifying our differences to some countries and magnifying our
similarities with others. And as I said, I think trust is built with
consistency, and I don't see consistency in some of your comments.
CONDOLEEZZA RICE: The state of behavior in the western hemisphere, the
sate of affairs in the western hemisphere, is such that we have had
democratic revolutions in all of these places, and we don't want to see
them go back. We have some places where the democratic revolution is
still to take place. We just have to understand that there are
differences in that regard. But I have said, we hope that the government
of Venezuela will continue to recognize what has been a mutually
beneficial relationship on energy and that we can continue to pursue
that. We certainly hope that we can continue to pursue counter-drug
activities in the Andean region, and Venezuela participates in that. But
I have to say that for the most part, the activities of the Venezuelan
government in the last couple of years have been pretty unconstructive.
SENATOR LINCOLN CHAFEE: Well, thank you very much. I'll go back to what
I said earlier. It seems disrespectful to the Venezuelan people. They
have spoken.
Stat.
In the all too brief new legislative session, I've seen more bad
behavior from congressional Democrats than in the previous two months
combined. But the incredibly antagonistic attitudes that they have
exhibited this week bring up some important realizations.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "WH" |
|
| Title: Re: The racist Dems |
21 Jan 2005 02:05:04 PM |
|
|
TonyZ2001 wrote:
The racist Dems
By Kevin McCullough
Posted: January 21, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
2005 WorldNetDaily.com
FLUUUUUSHHH!
WH
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
Dems admit, "We're clueless and out of touch"
More bad news for the Dems
Condescending Dems still don't get it
Dems self-destructing Again
Dems dreaming of 3rd term for Clinton
Bad News for Dems: The Economy is Booming!!!
Oh yeah, the Dems are helping the 'enemy', and Al Queda is siding with Iran...LOL!
Re : Dems Trying To Reinstate Military Draft; Bush Says No
| Dems forced to put up, or shut up
Michael Moore: Dems Are 'Wimps, Losers, cowards'
Re: Censorship, Apache Helicopters, and the Prosecution of a Racist, Judaeo-Fascist Theology
Re: Censorship, Apache Helicopters, and the Prosecution of a Racist, Judaeo-Fascist Theology
Oops. Jean Guernon. Discredited, lying old racist fool.
123
Racist Flyers Distributed In Hamilton
|
|
|
