The real Dani



 Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus > The real Dani

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Prophecies-Of-Nostradamus
User: "TonyZ2001"
Date: 30 May 2004 09:00:15 AM
Object: The real Dani
Read below to see the real Dani, the one who e-mailed me with
the same type of language and then tried to deny it.
Tony
http://www.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&newwindow=1&safe=off&selm=
Ljvc8.6657%24%25b6.1822379%40typhoon.ne.ipsvc.net

***** me Tony! Ooohhh - yeah! Let me feel you!
Let me suck and ***** like your pure innocent wife won't.
Lay back (let me on top) and let me devour you - satisfy you like
never before. Put those Christian beliefs aside for awhile - and let
me give you have multiple orgasms,
Let me ***** and suck you. You'll love it.
Dani

.

User: "Woodswun"

Title: Re: The real Dani 30 May 2004 03:22:26 PM
In article <20040530100015.09569.00000129@mb-m11.aol.com>,
(TonyZ2001) wrote:

Read below to see the real Dani, the one who e-mailed me with
the same type of language and then tried to deny it.
Tony

Sounds like she was really shovelling it on thick. You didn't actually take
that seriously, did you?
Woods
.
User: " John F Lemke"

Title: Re: The real Dani 30 May 2004 03:28:27 PM
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:6oruc.21020$j24.5219@twister.nyroc.rr.com...

In article <20040530100015.09569.00000129@mb-m11.aol.com>,

tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:

Read below to see the real Dani, the one who e-mailed me with
the same type of language and then tried to deny it.
Tony


Sounds like she was really shovelling it on thick. You didn't actually

take

that seriously, did you?

Woods

Doesn't look serious to me either. But if I'd said something similar to a
woman I'd expect to be chastised for harassment whether I was serious or
not.
.
User: "TonyZ2001"

Title: Re: The real Dani 31 May 2004 05:09:11 AM

John F Lemke"

wrote:

Doesn't look serious to me either. But if I'd said something similar to a
woman I'd expect to be chastised for harassment whether I was serious or
not.

Exactly, which shows just how biased the people of this group are.
Tony
.
User: "tw"

Title: Re: The real Dani 01 Jun 2004 04:23:15 AM
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040531060911.13157.00000132@mb-m20.aol.com...

John F Lemke"

wrote:

Doesn't look serious to me either. But if I'd said something similar to

a

woman I'd expect to be chastised for harassment whether I was serious or
not.


Exactly, which shows just how biased the people of this group are.

Ah! SO we've finally reached the stage where it's EVERYONE ELSE who is
biased and can't see teh truth and ONLY TONY who is right?
That's called "insanity", Sonny.
.
User: "TonyZ2001"

Title: Re: The real Dani 02 Jun 2004 11:04:17 AM

"tw"


wrote:


"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040531060911.13157.00000132@mb-m20.aol.com...

John F Lemke"

wrote:

Doesn't look serious to me either. But if I'd said something similar to

a

woman I'd expect to be chastised for harassment whether I was serious or
not.


Exactly, which shows just how biased >>the people of this group are.

Ah! SO we've finally reached the stage where it's EVERYONE ELSE who is
biased and can't see teh truth and ONLY >TONY who is right?

You know damn well that I mean most and not all.
If you don't, well then you're not half as intelligent as you'd like to think
you are.
Tony
.
User: "tw"

Title: Re: The real Dani 03 Jun 2004 02:33:35 AM
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040602120417.15734.00000218@mb-m24.aol.com...

"tw"


wrote:


"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040531060911.13157.00000132@mb-m20.aol.com...

John F Lemke"

wrote:

Doesn't look serious to me either. But if I'd said something similar

to

a

woman I'd expect to be chastised for harassment whether I was serious

or

not.


Exactly, which shows just how biased >>the people of this group are.


Ah! SO we've finally reached the stage where it's EVERYONE ELSE who is
biased and can't see teh truth and ONLY >TONY who is right?


You know damn well that I mean most and not all.

So most of the people in the world are biased and only you and a few others
aren't?
OK, that's still called insane but at least you have company. Like David
Koresh or the Heaven's Gate posse.
Either way, it doesn't look good for your sanity. Please, lay off the
steroids.

If you don't, well then you're not half as intelligent as you'd like to

think

you are.

It doesn't really improve your case Tony. Which leads me to believe you're
even more stupid than I'd like to think you are.


Tony


.

User: "Michael Johnathan McDonald"

Title: Re: The real Dani 03 Jun 2004 12:12:25 PM
(TonyZ2001) wrote in message news:<20040602120417.15734.00000218@mb-m24.aol.com>...

"tw"


wrote:


"TonyZ2001" <

> wrote in message
news:20040531060911.13157.00000132@mb-m20.aol.com...

John F Lemke"

wrote:

Doesn't look serious to me either. But if I'd said something similar to

a

woman I'd expect to be chastised for harassment whether I was serious or
not.


Exactly, which shows just how biased >>the people of this group are.


Ah! SO we've finally reached the stage where it's EVERYONE ELSE who is
biased and can't see teh truth and ONLY >TONY who is right?


You know damn well that I mean most and not all.

If you don't, well then you're not half as intelligent as you'd like to think
you are.

That can put him close to absolutly no intelligence at all - thats
scary! ...Because its the Mao (Anti-Intellectals) mentality that these
people think about themselves that they are right and all the
'rightwingers' are wrong that ends up killing 60-70 million people
because of their arrogance, like Mao's policies.
tw, Mao was a Socialist and their was NO DEMOCRACY - if you can get
that fact in your tiny-winy brain compartment that is already over
filled with garbage.
.
User: "tw"

Title: Re: The real Dani 04 Jun 2004 02:11:38 AM
"Michael Johnathan McDonald" <abookoflife@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dd3256f0.0406030912.4c9b8d2f@posting.google.com...

tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote in message

news:<20040602120417.15734.00000218@mb-m24.aol.com>...

"tw"


wrote:


"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040531060911.13157.00000132@mb-m20.aol.com...

John F Lemke"

wrote:

Doesn't look serious to me either. But if I'd said something

similar to

a

woman I'd expect to be chastised for harassment whether I was

serious or

not.


Exactly, which shows just how biased >>the people of this group are.


Ah! SO we've finally reached the stage where it's EVERYONE ELSE who is
biased and can't see teh truth and ONLY >TONY who is right?


You know damn well that I mean most and not all.

If you don't, well then you're not half as intelligent as you'd like to

think

you are.


That can put him close to absolutly no intelligence at all - thats
scary! .

Fomr you of all people...

..Because its the Mao (Anti-Intellectals) mentality that these
people think about themselves that they are right and all the
'rightwingers' are wrong that ends up killing 60-70 million people
because of their arrogance, like Mao's policies.

You're a fruitcake.

tw, Mao was a Socialist and their was NO DEMOCRACY - if you can get
that fact in your tiny-winy brain compartment that is already over
filled with garbage.

What ARE you yapping about now ? Is this to do with your bizarre
hallucinations about Socialist government? Which I have shown you to be
wrong via the example of numerous democratic socialist regimes.
Ah well, at least your consistently stupid I suppose.
.




User: "Mark"

Title: Re: The real Dani 31 May 2004 02:01:43 PM
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040531060911.13157.00000132@mb-m20.aol.com...

John F Lemke"

wrote:

Doesn't look serious to me either. But if I'd said something similar to

a

woman I'd expect to be chastised for harassment whether I was serious or
not.


Exactly, which shows just how biased the people of this group are.

Idiot. Then don't reply...
.

User: "4Dw"

Title: Re: The real Dani 01 Jun 2004 04:51:24 AM
In article <20040531060911.13157.00000132@mb-m20.aol.com>, TonyZ2001
<tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote:

John F Lemke"

wrote:

Doesn't look serious to me either. But if I'd said something similar to a
woman I'd expect to be chastised for harassment whether I was serious or
not.


Exactly, which shows just how biased the people of this group are.

Tony


Pot kettle black.... Don't play the victim Pantyboy
--
Are you part of the problem?
.


User: "Woodswun"

Title: Re: The real Dani 30 May 2004 06:08:22 PM
In article <AqKdnTXdpeL92SfdRVn-sw@locallink.net>, " John F Lemke" <jflemke@LocalLink.net> wrote:


"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:6oruc.21020$j24.5219@twister.nyroc.rr.com...

In article <20040530100015.09569.00000129@mb-m11.aol.com>,

tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:

Read below to see the real Dani, the one who e-mailed me with
the same type of language and then tried to deny it.
Tony


Sounds like she was really shovelling it on thick. You didn't actually

take

that seriously, did you?

Woods


Doesn't look serious to me either. But if I'd said something similar to a
woman I'd expect to be chastised for harassment whether I was serious or
not.

Depends on what/if this is in response to. If Tony hit on her, as she claims,
this would be a serious put-down from a 20-something female. If he didn't,this
would be considered harassment (legally, only if he asked her to stop and she
continued).
Woods
.
User: " John F Lemke"

Title: Re: The real Dani 30 May 2004 06:34:04 PM
"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:GPtuc.21411$j24.10033@twister.nyroc.rr.com...

In article <AqKdnTXdpeL92SfdRVn-sw@locallink.net>, " John F Lemke"

<jflemke@LocalLink.net> wrote:



Doesn't look serious to me either. But if I'd said something similar to

a

woman I'd expect to be chastised for harassment whether I was serious or
not.


Depends on what/if this is in response to. If Tony hit on her, as she

claims,

this would be a serious put-down from a 20-something female. If he

didn't,this

would be considered harassment (legally, only if he asked her to stop and

she

continued).

Woods

Yup, yer right. I think I missed the complete episode where Tony was
hitting on her. (Offline, right?)
Sounds like "The Young and the Feckless".
Did Ridge, ah I mean Tony, ask her to stop? :-) What happened after "this
serious putdown"? Did Tony tell her he wanted to have her baby?
.
User: "Woodswun"

Title: Re: The real Dani 30 May 2004 06:56:28 PM
In article <Mo6dnTHm2v588ifdRVn-sA@locallink.net>, " John F Lemke" <jflemke@LocalLink.net> wrote:


"Woodswun" <woodswun@tepidmail.com> wrote in message
news:GPtuc.21411$j24.10033@twister.nyroc.rr.com...

In article <AqKdnTXdpeL92SfdRVn-sw@locallink.net>, " John F Lemke"

<jflemke@LocalLink.net> wrote:



Doesn't look serious to me either. But if I'd said something similar to

a

woman I'd expect to be chastised for harassment whether I was serious or
not.


Depends on what/if this is in response to. If Tony hit on her, as she

claims,

this would be a serious put-down from a 20-something female. If he

didn't,this

would be considered harassment (legally, only if he asked her to stop and

she

continued).

Woods



Yup, yer right. I think I missed the complete episode where Tony was
hitting on her. (Offline, right?)

*shrug* I dunno. I think it was supposedly by email, but I really wasn't
paying that much attention. (Not especially interested in melodrama ;-)


Sounds like "The Young and the Feckless".

Did Ridge, ah I mean Tony, ask her to stop? :-) What happened after "this
serious putdown"? Did Tony tell her he wanted to have her baby?

No idea, other than that he seems to have blown a gasket.
Woods
.
User: "TonyZ2001"

Title: Re: The real Dani 31 May 2004 05:11:12 AM

woodswun@tepidmail.com

wrote:

No idea, other than that he seems to >have blown a gasket.
Woods

No, she did after I called her "dense", and she and her crew haven't stopped
since.
Tony
.
User: "Mark"

Title: Re: The real Dani 31 May 2004 02:01:09 PM
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040531061112.13157.00000133@mb-m20.aol.com...

woodswun@tepidmail.com

wrote:

No idea, other than that he seems to >have blown a gasket.


Woods


No, she did after I called her "dense", and she and her crew haven't

stopped

since.

Idiot.
.

User: "Dani"

Title: Re: The real Dani 01 Jun 2004 02:33:49 PM
On 31 May 2004 10:11:12 GMT,
(TonyZ2001) wrote:

woodswun@tepidmail.com

wrote:

No idea, other than that he seems to have blown a gasket.

No, she did after I called her "dense", and she and her crew haven't stopped
since.

Do you honestly think that this has all been over a little school-yard
name you called me almost three years ago?
Christ, you're really worse off than I thought.
Dani
.
User: "TonyZ2001"

Title: Re: The real Dani 02 Jun 2004 11:05:34 AM

Dani


wrote:

tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:

woodswun@tepidmail.com

wrote:


No idea, other than that he seems to have blown a gasket.


No, she did after I called her "dense", and she and her crew haven't stopped
since.

Do you honestly think that this has all >been over a little school-yard
name you called me almost three years >ago?

That's where it all started Dippi, you went over the edge when I called you
that because as you said "that's what my husband used to call me".
And he was right.
Tony
.








User: "somewhere up north"

Title: Re: The real Dani 30 May 2004 11:41:56 AM
You never cease to amaze me in showing us how small, spiteful, full of hate
and generally how evil you really are churchboy.
What is it with you and sex? Do you repress it or guiltily crave it so much
that it must come out in most of your messages where you do more than
copy/paste? Is it that years of trying to suppress those same sex feeling or
that you feel inadequate that you must belittle all other posters on this
board?
Jeesh! You sure are a fine Christian example, following the teaching of
Jesus and turning the other cheek.... not!
Al
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040530100015.09569.00000129@mb-m11.aol.com...

Read below to see the real Dani, the one who e-mailed me with
the same type of language and then tried to deny it.
Tony

http://www.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&newwindow=1&safe=off&selm=

.
User: "TonyZ2001"

Title: Re: The real Dani 31 May 2004 05:12:46 AM

somewhere up north" >greatwhitenorth@upthere.com

wrote:

What is it with you and sex?

Uh, wrong person to ask, it was Dani who wrote all of that, not me.
Tony
.
User: "Mark"

Title: Re: The real Dani 31 May 2004 02:00:47 PM
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040531061246.13157.00000134@mb-m20.aol.com...

somewhere up north" >greatwhitenorth@upthere.com

wrote:


What is it with you and sex?


Uh, wrong person to ask, it was Dani who wrote all of that, not me.

Then don't reply...
.

User: "Woodswun"

Title: Re: The real Dani 31 May 2004 06:28:20 AM
In article <20040531061246.13157.00000134@mb-m20.aol.com>,
(TonyZ2001) wrote:

somewhere up north" >greatwhitenorth@upthere.com

wrote:


What is it with you and sex?


Uh, wrong person to ask, it was Dani who wrote all of that, not me.

I believe the point was that you're obsessing over it.
Woods
.
User: "TonyZ2001"

Title: Re: The real Dani 31 May 2004 06:36:41 AM

woodswun@tepidmail.com

wrote:

tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:

somewhere up north" >greatwhitenorth@upthere.com

wrote:


What is it with you and sex?


Uh, wrong person to ask, it was Dani >>who wrote all of that, not me.

I believe the point was that you're >obsessing over it.
Woods

Not at all, just letting the truth be known.
Tony
.
User: "Mark"

Title: Re: The real Dani 31 May 2004 01:51:07 PM
"TonyZ2001" <tonyz2001@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040531073641.06380.00000214@mb-m12.aol.com...

woodswun@tepidmail.com

wrote:

tonyz2001@aol.com (TonyZ2001) wrote:

somewhere up north" >greatwhitenorth@upthere.com

wrote:


What is it with you and sex?


Uh, wrong person to ask, it was Dani >>who wrote all of that, not me.


I believe the point was that you're >obsessing over it.
Woods


Not at all, just letting the truth be known.

Obsessively, I might add.
.






  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER